The Maliss Combo Guide!

[@unknownethos4419]

I really liked the way you explained the combos and your reasoning. Easy to follow and I learned a lot.

[@AllfootballNostalgia]

Just found you mate and good job explaining you got a sub from me 👍

[@aglovecraft]

nice video, i think u should summon the white rabbit between the white binder and red random to take no battle damage

[@NoahAFF]

you can also leave it open for a dormouse aswell, which is pretty cool to help insulate against certain boardbreakers.

[@ruydantas872]

nice, more combos with bystials pls

[@iTzTayo]

Good vid chief

[@aluntumsudnit2526]

Combo 1, with red ransom and chessy cat ,make little knight and banish the red ransom and then you still have splash mage for follow up after that. Little knight is a combo extender as well and could possibly be played at multiple copies.

[@NoahAFF]

If you do that you lose 1 extra body that would be needed for hearts of crypter

[@aluntumsudnit2526]

Thats true , i see what you were trying to show there. Maybe its something that can be incorporated into one of your other lines as using your non cyberse extension before splash mage allows you to play through multiple handtraps. S:P plays very well around nib.

[@daxonion]

Combo 1 im pretty sure there is a way to co-link firewall dragon to 2 monsters to recycle 2 monsters and summon Chessy later to resolve the draw 2

[@NoahAFF]

Yep, there was a way, im just not a fan of it tbh, i like keeping the firewall in ed for disruption via code of soul

[@daxonion]

@@NoahAFF i think that makes no sense. You should value drawing 2 cards more than replacing your packbit/aggregator interruption with a random bounce that is achieved by playing a 'brick' especially if you are allocating space for both.

[@NoahAFF]

​@@daxonionthis is true.

[@SharkdYGO]

This thumbnail needs to stop

[@roblesjuanantonio]

Min 0:58 why go into splash mage and lock ourselves Couldn’t we just go straight into Binder using Randsom + Chessy? Just picked up the deck I’m still learning

[@roblesjuanantonio]

I got it lol

[@IBmaster4]

@@roblesjuanantonio Well, you could Ransom + Chessy into S:P and banish Ransom, to continue the combo, if you wanna skip Splash Mage.

[@Eric-qd6xi]

The anti nibline summons red on summon 5 that plays better into nib

[@NoahAFF]

Yes, thats also a good combo. I personally like to have access to gwc an white binder out early so i fear less about what handtraps they have and i know i will always end on something.

[@nethxing]

Always have an argument that maliss loose to boardbreakers and you get otkd so how would i deal with people that run 3 raigeki 2 storm etc

[@NoahAFF]

Great question, i think its best i cover it in a future video as its a pretty big topic. That being said, You can get creative in the way you use your disruptions for example dormouse has a hidden effect to protect mallis link monsters from destruction that point to it. It depends what your facing up against. Like if they go raigeki on the terrahertz you just use the desavewurm then if the go ls backrow u can just chain trap summon back. I dont think you lose to any 1 board breaker. They will have to open multiple and even then code of soul can help you just make more disruptions.

[@forbiddenbox1738]

If they run 3 raigekis and 2 lightning storm, and open as many, you have less cards to deal with. Know your interruptions and your interactions, and you'll be fine. If your locals run board breakers, you should run solutions in response. For example, you can play more bystials to rely less on GWC, or you could run P{rotectcode talker to protect your board. There's tons of ways to counter the anti-meta, and you should be ready for it. However, I do have to agree that your statement is true, as I personally had issues playing against Sky Strikers. I think in that case, in which the matchup comes up alot, you could rely on cards like shifter.

[@nethxing]

@@NoahAFF striker

[@nethxing]

@@forbiddenbox1738 yeah striker

[@nethxing]

@@NoahAFF there's forbidden dropplet,widow anchor to

[@JynxieJynxx]

the first combo, doesnt this just auto lose to ash? using the TB super early also means your Red Ransom can get impermed easier

[@NoahAFF]

You had no choice its a white rabbit 1 card combo. If i had dormouse ofcourse the combo would be different

[@GutsmanLoL]

1 card combo loses to 1 handtrap, yes.

[@BloodBathory]

i dont think ur first combo line can play though nibiru, u use ur splash mage to early, why dont make little knight stead?

[@NoahAFF]

You would require the extra body for heart of crypter. If you want to respect nib of course the combo would be different.

[@al-zahir4701]

What you thinke about and the band played on,against ryzeal?,for side

[@NoahAFF]

Dbarrier kinda already fills that slot. But not a bad choice.

[@theIshRightHere]

Nice video! Can you make timestamps if possible?

[@NoahAFF]

Thanks, i have updated it with timestamps.

[@flyboy5500]

What if they drop nib on haggard dorm and chessy?

[@NoahAFF]

You can choose to not use dormouse to banish chessy from deck if you want to respect nib. Then just go with combo.

[@flyboy5500]

@ super fair ty

[@MrSinaster]

Why would you splash mage over S:P to extend? You lock yourself no reason

[@NoahAFF]

yes and no, you are right where if you didn't want to lock your self i could've gone SP but doing so I would've lost 1 extra body which i would've needed for the heart of crypter. also conserving your S:P is never a bad thing. If you were referring the combo at 6:46 then yes S:P would've been better here, thanks for pointing it out. EDIT: You actually cannot use s:p in that combo since you already used white binder you need the extra body for the red ransom

[@afr23m]

@@NoahAFF sorry, can you explain how S:P is better at the 6:46?

[@NoahAFF]

​​@@afr23mno worries! here is what would be different: s:p will can banish binder for a draw one and summon. Then you can link off s:p and Bunder for red ransom, add your field spell activate field spell banish chessy then you can make firewall after that. End result is that you get one more draw, and doesnt lock you

[@afr23m]

@@NoahAFF but you already used the binder revive earlier in the combo: You TB-11'd, banishing binder to bring out chessy and then binder summons back and u draw one if you S:P banish chessy then you can't use it later with the field spell so you would have to use link decoder to climb into firewall. Isn't it essentially the same line except now you've used your S:P instead of using splash mage?

[@NoahAFF]

​@@afr23mThanks for pointing that out, it looks like my combo was actually correct, you cant actually use sp in that combo. You are unable to use link decoder here since you need a maliss name to make red ransom and you cant trigger link decoder earlier in the combo. It was early in the morning and i wasnt thinking straight. Sorry for the misinformation

[@miguelbarba9670]

Lost a deck profile

[@yu-gi-ohmeta385]

Any deck utilities shifter is just disgusting!