The Millennium Prize Problems I

  Рет қаралды 29,653

It's so blatant

It's so blatant

Күн бұрын

Lecture by John Tate
Riemann hypothesis, Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, P vs NP
Source of the video and also further information on the topics can be found under:
(1) www.claymath.org/
(2) www.claymath.or...

Пікірлер: 38
@xCorvus7x
@xCorvus7x 6 жыл бұрын
To anyone who is complaining about 'how boring this lecture was' and 'how bad an educator' the lecturer seems to be: Has it ever occured to you that the real problem here might be yourself, that maybe you cannot concentrate enough to follow, or that you might fundamentally lack the interest to do so?
@acetate909
@acetate909 5 жыл бұрын
What a stupid comment. Why would someone who "lacked a fundamental interest" in mathematics seek out and then watch an hour long lecture on it's most dense and complicated areas of study? People who have trouble concentrating generally don't click on 47 minute academic lectures when browsing KZbin. "Has it ever occurred to you" that this may actually be a subjectively boring presentation? There are much better lectures, articles, videos that cover the millennium problems.
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Degree eight equal problem four. This is law of identity two. b + c = 2x
@dobeeeeval
@dobeeeeval 8 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I guess I expected something a little higher quality, given the introduction. Then he pulls out a projector lol.
@jojojorisjhjosef
@jojojorisjhjosef 7 жыл бұрын
Clearly you haven't seen the entire video.
@dobeeeeval
@dobeeeeval 7 жыл бұрын
jojojorisjhjosef What would I have said differently if I had?
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Four total equal five deductive eight is axiom non eulidian geometry k+1=k-1=0n
@Adivasilover10
@Adivasilover10 5 жыл бұрын
great mathematician
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
類体において八問と四問は二千年を証明しています。八題を四題にするにはメルセンヌ数に関数を仕組むのであり8k-4k/2=k-1にすると証明されました。
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Problem Millennium 2k
@LRahmanGrandUnifiedModelLRahma
@LRahmanGrandUnifiedModelLRahma Жыл бұрын
L. Rahman of Bangladesh have Proved 7 Millennium Prize Problem Dhanbari Collegiate Model School 99 Batch Notre Dame College Dhaka Islamic University Kushtia University of Dhaka MS in IT
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
2000 がメルセンヌ数で証明されました。2^n-1=2^k-1=point zeros.
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Demonstration theorem
@ayyythatguy
@ayyythatguy 7 жыл бұрын
Good content, but I get the message that the speakers were not excited to share. They made it painful to sit through.
@siciidyaasiin8500
@siciidyaasiin8500 5 жыл бұрын
I will solve them
@imironman5763
@imironman5763 4 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Millennium problem is kilo kash bytes problem. 2k
@magnuswootton7368
@magnuswootton7368 6 жыл бұрын
even just listing the prime numbers is an np task.
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Millennium/1k
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Mersenne millennium problem m2k
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
Aleph-0n
@Ub3rSk1llz
@Ub3rSk1llz 7 жыл бұрын
when people say maths is boring, it's because of lectures like this. these kinds of people must be excised from the education system for the benefit of humanity. /soapbox
@zzeuqdhd9598
@zzeuqdhd9598 2 жыл бұрын
Vérifie, les zéro non triviaux l idée de cherché l angle @(s) de la série puisque F(s)=a(n)^2+b(n)^2)×e^i@(s) a(n)=la somme cosbln/n^a et b(n)=sinbln/n^a , sinbln2×F(s)=la somme sinbln2×cosbln(n)/n^a +isinbln2×sinbln(n)/n^a l application de la formule sinax ×sinbx=-cos(a+b)X+COS(a-b)X/2 de même sinax× cosbx= sin(à+b) -sin(a-b)/2 on trouve sinbln2×F(s)=la somme 1/2×n^a ×(sinbln(2n)+icosbln(2n) + la somme 1/2×n^a(sinbln(n/2)+icosbln(n/2) =2^a-1 × la somme 1/(2n)^a ×e^i(π/2-bln2n +1/2× la somme 1/n^a × e^-i(π/2-bln(n/2) =1/2^1+ib × F(s)×i + 1/2^1+ib ×-i×F($) d'où (isinbl2+1/2^1+ib)×F(s)=1/2^1+ib ×F($) puisque F($) série pour $=a-ib F(s)=la somme 1/n^a ×e^ibln(n) finalement F($)=(i×2^1+ib ×sinbl2 +1)×F(s) puisque a(n)^2+b(n)^2=F($)×F(s) d ou e^-i2@(s)=(i×2^1+ib ×sinbln +1) d ou @(s)=1/2×i × ln(1 + i×2^1+ib×sinbl2) d ou pour F(s)=0 équivalent @(s)=0 équivalent b= k×π/ln2 quelques soit k appartiennent N la remarque quelques soit un nombre premier P×π/ln2~P' égalité d un autre nombre premier
@cheekymonkey3929
@cheekymonkey3929 7 жыл бұрын
Obvious ly✌️😂
@kenichimori8533
@kenichimori8533 3 жыл бұрын
analysis∀
@systempatcher
@systempatcher 9 жыл бұрын
This is so mundane and boring. Math is fun don't kill it!
@quantumfeet
@quantumfeet 8 жыл бұрын
boring!!!!!!!!!
@magnuswootton7368
@magnuswootton7368 6 жыл бұрын
its because you dont understand.
@v6790
@v6790 4 жыл бұрын
@@magnuswootton7368 lmao
@happylittlemonk
@happylittlemonk 5 жыл бұрын
No disrespect, this is the worst presentation I have seen. No wonder no one has solved it. They have to give me a million first to listen to this.
@sanitakanca4704
@sanitakanca4704 3 жыл бұрын
You think it's boring because you don't understand it and you lack the interest to do so.
The Millennium Prize Problems II
55:59
It's so blatant
Рет қаралды 6 М.
The Riemann Hypothesis, Explained
16:24
Quanta Magazine
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Why no RONALDO?! 🤔⚽️
00:28
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 116 МЛН
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
The Key to the Riemann Hypothesis - Numberphile
12:38
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Poincaré Conjecture - Numberphile
8:52
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Frieze Patterns - Numberphile
13:00
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 300 М.
The Riemann Hypothesis
19:36
singingbanana
Рет қаралды 589 М.
Beyond Computation: The P vs NP Problem - Michael Sipser
1:01:38
PoincareDuality
Рет қаралды 164 М.
The Greatest Mathematician Who Ever Lived
16:06
Newsthink
Рет қаралды 499 М.
Imaginary numbers aren't imaginary
13:55
Ali the Dazzling
Рет қаралды 185 М.
The Million Dollar Equations - with Tom Crawford
1:11:40
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 100 М.
A tricky problem from Harvard University Interview
18:11
Higher Mathematics
Рет қаралды 304 М.
The Millennium Meeting
29:12
It's so blatant
Рет қаралды 1,3 М.
Why no RONALDO?! 🤔⚽️
00:28
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 116 МЛН