The new(ish) camera on the Delta IV showed the deployment of the RL-10B Nozzle extension so I thought I'd talk about this workhorse upper stage engine. Lots more info on the evolution can be found on this page: www.b14643.de/S...
Пікірлер: 332
@SRFriso945 жыл бұрын
That ice is freaky, being mere centimeters away from thousands of degrees.
@NGC14335 жыл бұрын
But it is the main product of that reaction, which heats it all up to thousands of degrees is water! And it cools down by expansion! Thermodynamics!
@Lhunath5 жыл бұрын
Can anyone explain more in depth what causes the exhaust to get so cold there?
@dubsy10265 жыл бұрын
@@Lhunath the nozzle is cooled by liquid hydrogen
@SRFriso945 жыл бұрын
@@Lhunath Just like Scott explains: that version of the RL-10 has an actively cooled nozzle, and they do that by pumping the fuel an oxidizer, which are at something like -250 degrees Celcius, so the outer wall is really cold, while the inner wall is nice and warm. Space Shuttle used the same system.
@mathboy_5 жыл бұрын
If obviously there is no heat being put out from the engine does that mean that standing right next to the nozzle would be possible? Or going even further, would there actually be a chilling effect outside of the nozzle?
@Vaasref5 жыл бұрын
Those are not icicles, they are part of an ice based nozzle extension 3D printed of the fly.
@charadremur3334 жыл бұрын
:D
@stupidgenius423 жыл бұрын
*on the fly
@RobertCraft-re5sf2 ай бұрын
Bravo
@anarchyantz15645 жыл бұрын
No matter how many times I see it, watching the thin blue line fading into the deep black is always fascinating.
@theimperfectgod71405 жыл бұрын
Oh hoo Agreed :)
@ahaveland5 жыл бұрын
Icicles on a rocket nozzle? Mind boggled!
@theimperfectgod71405 жыл бұрын
nICE (*_,* )
@duraikarthikeyan5 жыл бұрын
Loved that "omegA" pronunciation.
@kristenburnout15 жыл бұрын
"Oh Meg AAAAAAAH."
@DobromirManchev5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, what was that about? I chucked out loud at work at that point in the video :D
@kristenburnout15 жыл бұрын
Someone should make a compilation of scott saying "Ohmeeeg-Aaaah".
@kaptendavid54275 жыл бұрын
Love from Tanzania, I just love how on the outside is freezing cold and on the inside its blazing hot..... Amazing... Thumbs up great video.
@pseudotasuki5 жыл бұрын
It's a good thing Aerojet Rocketdyne started work on bringing down the cost of RL-10, as that's probably the only thing preventing them from being obliterated by Blue Origin.
@afterburner1195 жыл бұрын
Well my money would still go behind the 60 some odd years AR/P&W has on the RL-10. Approximately 475+ missions with a success rate in which you can count the failures on one hand.
@pseudotasuki5 жыл бұрын
@@afterburner119 Which is useless if nobody wants to buy them.
@kazumiohta87275 жыл бұрын
There’s no way that ULA is letting go of the RL-10
@kazumiohta87275 жыл бұрын
They like it too much
@kazumiohta87275 жыл бұрын
Also SpaceX is better.
@QuietElite5 жыл бұрын
For me the RL-10 is probably the most iconic hydrolox rocket engine :)
@RealityIsTheNow5 жыл бұрын
Naw...the RL-25. Bigger, dramatically displayed on the Shuttle for decades, reusable, etc etc.
@gordonrichardson29725 жыл бұрын
The Shuttle engines were RS-25, not RL-25.
@rjherche5 жыл бұрын
J-2 son
@rlstnnl17405 жыл бұрын
RD-0120 or bust
@MushVPeets5 жыл бұрын
@@rlstnnl1740 Um, no, that's just the _best_ hydrolox engine. Not really the most iconic. :P
@MarkZacharias5 жыл бұрын
@Scott I just wanted to say thanks for keeping your intro short. I love that you get to the meat of the video in ~6 seconds.
@georgegrubbs29668 ай бұрын
I worked on this rocket engine in 1962-1963 at Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Company in West Palm Beach, Florida. Yes, an excellent engine that is still in use today.
@kevins2604 ай бұрын
My grandfather Wesley Kuhrt was responsible for the overall design of the RL10 and was gifted the patent for the the RL-10 rocket at P&W. He came up with the original idea for changing the expander cycle and was a genius with regard to liquid hydrogen. My family used to tell a story about when he was 13 he accidenelt exploded a test tube with hydrogen in his basement and had glass imbedded in his chest. I have the original pump expander design patent plaques gifted in his name. He lead the research department for many years and ended as Executive Vice President of United Technologies in the 1980’s.
@marksinclair7012 ай бұрын
Impressive guy!
@chrishunter70655 жыл бұрын
I got to see this from 7 miles away. I loved the sound of this massive rocket.
@Hopeless_and_Forlorn4 жыл бұрын
The RL-10 was designed by Pratt & Whitney, the same engine company responsible for the R-1830 engine used on the DC-3/C47 and many other iconic airplanes, the R-2800 that in effect became the war-winning radial engine equivalent of the British Merlin V-12, and the reliable R-4360 workhorse of post-war heavy hauling. Quite a legacy for a machine shop.
@Sk1erDev5 жыл бұрын
Could an extending nozzle be used for an any altitude engine? As the pressure decreases, the nozzle extends more.
@gordonrichardson29725 жыл бұрын
The nozzle has to lock into place, otherwise there will be severe blow-back.
@Sillydogification5 жыл бұрын
Far better would be to use an Aerospike Engine. The reason for the nozzle extension is to reduce the overall size of the engine, so the interstage structure can be shorter.
@robertmiller97355 жыл бұрын
Too bad nobody's willing to try aerospikes.
@km54055 жыл бұрын
its always a payoff between optimizing for a altitude and performance/weigth. a any altitude engine might not be ideal.
@ryanrising22374 жыл бұрын
Robert Miller loads of people are willing to try aerospikes, but it turns out they’re just very hard - beyond what normal rockets are.
@phaseed5 жыл бұрын
The "Screws" are worm gears that are used on the extensions. Worm gear rods are stationary and worm gear drives are the square blocks you see in the video.
@robrod71205 жыл бұрын
I was there!!! Saw the NROL launch, my first launch ever. It was incredible and just left me in awe at the power of our machines
@shadowraith15 жыл бұрын
Historically I think a lot of rocketry was hidden from cameras for the general public. Everyone had their secrets. A lot of them still do. Blue Origins comes to mind as one. I have to credit SpaceX for raising the public's interest in space again. Their broadcast coverage of their success and failures. Has been enlightening for all of us space junkies. Every launch and recovery has been a sales pitch for the company giving them worldwide recognition. Using that business model has been pretty successful. I do wish they would get better at their drone ship landing videos. A couple of drones with transmitters chaining the transmission signal might help for better video. By the way do you have any idea what those fairing half's weigh? Was wondering if a helicopter might be useful. Put the copter on whatever drone ship is waiting for the Falcon 9. When the fairing's eject copter takes off catch the fairing drop it on net on the west coast. That was longer than expected.
@TheEvilmooseofdoom5 жыл бұрын
The droneships lose the uplink to the satellite (and I doubt they'll spend the money to try and correct that) but spacex still gets the footage. It's only the stream that doesn't.
@Anvilshock5 жыл бұрын
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom lose*
@TheEvilmooseofdoom5 жыл бұрын
@@Anvilshock Got it. Thanks.
@traviswinch45365 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video last week. You answered my exact question I had for Tim Dodd just before the launch. I could not recall ever seeing the deployment of the nozzle before but knew it existed...awesome video. Thanks.
@wanjockey5 жыл бұрын
this was probably the coolest(no pun) videos I have seen of close up H-O engines firing. Thanks.
@timandshannon035 жыл бұрын
I also live in Norcal and took the wife and son to SoCal to watch the launch outside of Vandenburg! It was a beautiful launch!
@willys48825 жыл бұрын
RL-10 was originally built and tested with the H-1, Redstone, F-1 turbopumps etc. at the now closed North American Aviation Propulsion Division/ Rocketdyne/ Air Force Plant 65 in my home town of Neosho, MO. I remember exploring around the bases of the test stands as a Boy Scout when I was about 10-12 (1992-94). That is some fairly obscure space history!
@larthallor5 жыл бұрын
The RL-10 was also used in the DC-X SSTO demonstrator project, in part due to its ability to throttle/restart.
@donjones47195 жыл бұрын
Wonder of that's when they developed the extendable nozzle. SSTO engines operating from sea level to space would really need that benefit, in spades.
@richwaight5 жыл бұрын
That last bit about the icicles was mind bending!! Thanks for posting
@bisowned135 жыл бұрын
ALMOST 500 LIKES AND NO DISLIKES! No one produces content of this depth can quality! Thanks for all you do Scott!
@nickdehart57025 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to say Scott....I had ZERO interest in space about three years ago. However, I did like KZbin. I stumbled across one of your videos (I do not remember which one) and it started. Between you and Tim Dodd, it has lit a fire underneath me. I read and watch anything I can to learn. I often wonder what would have become of me as a high school student had I known I had such an passion for all things space? At thirty one years old, I feel my only option is to pass it to my son. Who, as of now, has no interest in anything but Fortnite. But that might change as he gets older. I just wanted to say thank you for all you do. You really do affect people in a positive way!
@eannamcnamara93385 жыл бұрын
Same thing but the big question do you play KSP
@eannamcnamara93385 жыл бұрын
And your son would love playing it to
@cheesegrease82475 жыл бұрын
@@eannamcnamara9338 kerbal space program: *_BATTLE ROYALE_*
@eannamcnamara93385 жыл бұрын
@@cheesegrease8247nasa begins default dancing on the constellation program it just killed (I don't play fortnite but I know the memes)
@martinultimatevw37795 жыл бұрын
Same here dude 🤟👌
@robertbilling62665 жыл бұрын
Really neat engineering, thanks.
@Veptis5 жыл бұрын
hey Scott, thanks for keeping it up. I just went through 3 booksotres and look for Ignition by John D Clark, no chance as it seems to be not that common, but I ordered it and will pick it up soon. For the next few months I made two of my school project about rockets. You and your videos have been a great motivation to do so. The first one is a chemistry talk and experiment I want to present on rocket fuels. I chose to do a liquid hypergolic reaction on the basis of the book and the video by NileRed - if I somehow can get my teacher to allow it. The other is a really scaled up version of the history of rockets for history class. It is supposed to talk about the cold war and how nuclear bombs(thanks for your video series on this as well), missles(not rockets sadly) and information technologies(spy satellites) have dictated this period. My version tells this story by showing 3D models in 1:82 scale I print of soviet and american rockets and telling all the funny tales and twists to show my class a picture of how interesting space exploration can be. I use your videos and those of others like Curios Droid as references alongside wikipedia lists and some official archive material for the Kennedy speech etc. thank you!
@BlackWolf42-5 жыл бұрын
I got it a few days ago from Amazon. It took almost 2 weeks to get here. Edit: Do get the physical version. The pages aren't as intoxicatingly odoriferous as other books but nothing beats a copy you can hold.
@Sir_Uncle_Ned5 жыл бұрын
It really is remarkable how we can have fire and ice co-existing.
@kenhelmers26033 жыл бұрын
Amazing, ice on a rocket engine exhaust bell. Thanks Scott!
@SermedAlWasiti5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this vid, Scott...it expands on what you mentioned on Twitter.
@Quirk915 жыл бұрын
That nozzle extension is pure genius!
@TheClintonio5 жыл бұрын
Scott - your outro music always gave a sense of satisfaction that the new music lacks.
@neuterdude59325 жыл бұрын
It is amazing to see those icicles on the nozzle!
@Raptorman09093 жыл бұрын
The expander cycle is the right choice for lunar landers -- well within the square-cube limit, low stress on the turbine, very high ISP -- and with 3D printing simplifying the construction and likely improving the reliability it just makes more sense than any other engine cycle for reusable landers on the Moon.
@Marc83Aus5 жыл бұрын
I wondered why they were going for a new, heavier, slightly lower performance version of the old workhorse, I figured the new engine must be significantly cheaper to build. Then Scott pointed out the RL 10 is already the most efficient chemical rocket engine, so I suppose it can afford to lose a couple of ISP here or therel
@BlackWolf42-5 жыл бұрын
Scott, I've been reading the book "Ignition!" that you recommended. It's a VERY good read for those that have a modest 'chem-thumb'. Those propulsion chemists have a neat job.
@lucidonoccasion50125 жыл бұрын
Love the videos on rocket engines, keep em coming!
@davidmorgan86124 жыл бұрын
Excellent video
@Katia_Managan5 жыл бұрын
Hey, don’t mind me. Just dropping by to let you know that the thumbnail looks just like an album cover for an indie rock band and I totally dig it.
@zakiranderson7223 жыл бұрын
I never knew a nozzle extension existed, I thought the vaccuum nozzle on the engine itself would be the final solution!!
@F1fan4eva5 жыл бұрын
Awesome info Scott! Subbing to you is like literally signing up for a channel that reports rocket/space news. And the best part? It's free!! Someone did once say the best things in life are free :)
@poisonouspython14105 жыл бұрын
That's a pretty COOL rocket motor design...
@tomjones12585 жыл бұрын
Scott, rocket-cam on NASA EFT-1, December 5, 2014
@jr52345 жыл бұрын
I once read that during a ground test of an RL-10 engine the nozzle extension was inadvertently lowered after the engine had already begun firing. Apparently it chugged on through the transition as if nothing was wrong. There was some talk of in-flight nozzle extension deployment as a way to boost first stage performance on future rockets but I don't think it was developed far enough to be tested.
@CyberiusT5 жыл бұрын
I had never seen that ice formation before. That is nuts. My brain understands why it happens, but that sure isn't something I would ever have thought of.
@ipudisciple5 жыл бұрын
5:00 I was wondering how specific impulse could be measured in seconds. I mean, it's the time for what exactly? So I looked it up and decided to share. As far as I can tell, if you were to let the propellant free fall in a vacuum under earth gravity for that amount of time, then it reaches some speed, and that's the exhaust speed we're talking about. Of course, this is useful because the momentum of the propellant gets transferred (negatively) to the rocket.
@scottmanley5 жыл бұрын
The other way to think about it is if you multiply the acceleration of earth’s gravity by the specific impulse in seconds you get velocity. And this works regardless of whether you use meters per second of feet per second.
@Kieselmeister5 жыл бұрын
specific impulse = (impulse per unit weight-on-Earth of propellant) Calculated via -> Thrust (mass*distance/seconds^2)= gravity(distance/second^2) * ISP(seconds) * Fuel consumption rate (mass/second). Thus Isp in seconds = the number of seconds a rocket engine can generate thrust from a weight of fuel equal to the thrust of the engine.
@RappinPicard5 жыл бұрын
There's an RL-10B-2 as part of a Delta III upper stage and fairing that's on display next to the 5 in Santa Ana that I drive past every day.
@positronundervolt47995 жыл бұрын
I like ULAs self immolation method of getting to space.
@thomascharlton85455 жыл бұрын
Thanks Scott, Great content!
@_tyrannus5 жыл бұрын
I must say that without the RL-10 variants, KSP with Realism Overhaul would be much more complicated in terms of 2nd stage design.
@gizmothewytchdoktor10495 жыл бұрын
the con trail reminds me of an umbilical cord. thanks rocketcam...i will never look at one of these in quite the same way again! :-)
@waedi735 жыл бұрын
Wow ! Sooo crazy to see it ! Ice forming on a rocket booster bell ! This video is outstanding interesting ! Thank you very much ! and the mün is bloody exciting love
@brocktechnology5 жыл бұрын
Those ball screws seem a slightly excessive solution for a single use actuator. Also, those icicles are mind blowing.
@erictaylor54625 жыл бұрын
That is wild to see ice on a rocket engine like that.
@ryccoh5 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this.
@adamantium19835 жыл бұрын
Love the ice... looks unreal
@alexlandherr5 жыл бұрын
Maybe a detailed video on rocket engineering cameras perhaps? I would love to see those explained in great detail by you.
@AlphaSquadZero5 жыл бұрын
I want to stick something into that exhaust stream.
@tommyboy0545 жыл бұрын
Wow, just wow.
@j_sum15 жыл бұрын
Looks like something between a dalek and a steampunk petticoat.
@bernardolozano74295 жыл бұрын
Great vid
@avejst5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this😀👍
@ig2d5 жыл бұрын
That thumbnail looks like some kind of haute couture ball gown
@quoniam4265 жыл бұрын
Now ask girls to coseplay as RL10 exhausts !
@davidmoore12535 жыл бұрын
The thumbnail looks like an unmasked dalek.
@williamhedegaardlangvad26305 жыл бұрын
Did the delta IV from Orion EFT-1 not carry a rocket cam?
@gordonrichardson29725 жыл бұрын
There is a lot of information into the video, though no mention of the fact that the RL10 was designed to be man rated, but only used on Saturn 1 for Apollo boiler-plate test launches. The initial Saturn-IV proposal would have used 6 RL10 engines, but the revised S-IVB design used a single J-2 engine. The RL10 engine never made it into the final Apollo moon landing designs, though it did inspire the development of the J-2 and F-1 engines.
@Strike_Raid5 жыл бұрын
There isn't much in common between the RL-10, J-2 and F-1 other than when they were developed.
@alexsiemers78985 жыл бұрын
I want to know how an extendable nozzle could work for the Raptor on the BFR. In particular, it could be used in a retracted state for an atmospheric (much smaller) nozzle. Plus, the LCH4 fuel means that the regenerative cooling wouldn’t be as necessary due to the lower temperatures.
@stephenirwin27615 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@AndrewScott838155 жыл бұрын
Hey Scott! I would really love to see a video about how rocket engines are vacuum tested on the ground. Can they test upper stage solid boosters in a vacuum at sea level? What type of equipment is used to sustain a vacuum for testing? Anyway! Great vid!
@Clap_My_Dog5 жыл бұрын
That's a beast of a rocket
@freesaxon68355 жыл бұрын
Another winner video
@hydrolox39533 жыл бұрын
Im Scott Manley, expand safe!
@erfquake15 жыл бұрын
Hey Scott, idea for a show: the old Russian NK-33 (?) engine; revolutionary closed system, much better performance, had a bad run with the N-1, put in storage, rediscovered by the West as "sliced bread 2.0", cleaned up, renamed AJ-26, had a bad run with Antares, and now what? Was it finally tossed as a concept, or are there versions still kicking around? What's your take on that evolutionary line of engine design?
@notmadeofpeople49355 жыл бұрын
3:10 The RL10 looks like a dalek in this picture.
@WonTonChickon5 жыл бұрын
this is cool
@erictaylor54625 жыл бұрын
I grew up in California, and I can tell, that is no California accent you sport there, Scott.
@scottmanley5 жыл бұрын
It's not.
@IvorMektin17015 жыл бұрын
It's a very small motor too, the power head will fit on a desk.
@joe_mckirdy5 жыл бұрын
Fun facts: RL-10C-1 -> Atlas RL-10C-2 -> Delta IV RL-10C-3 -> SLS RL-10C-5 -> Omega RL-10C-X -> 3d printed
@technicalsupport60165 жыл бұрын
evening from uk Scott
@jidgeanimations68665 жыл бұрын
Lovely fireball
@memespeech3 жыл бұрын
4:55 the stats seem to be in favor of the A-4-2 and B-2, unless the C-1 is cheaper or more reliable, but that's not in the stats..
@UpLateGeek5 жыл бұрын
From the thumbnail it looked like you were talking about Daleks!
@DouglasJohann5 жыл бұрын
So, the second stage engine don't fire before the nozzle is fully extended, that has to cost a bit of performance (like not firing it right away after stage sep.). I'm sure the overall benefit must make it worth it but just thinking.
@AcydDrop5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video. Scott, quick question for you, if you have a second. Do you still play Eve Online? I know you were active at one point just curious if you still are.
@baarni5 жыл бұрын
Why does there appear to be a bunch of frames missing from the footage at the point of booster separation? It doesn't appear to be a signal issue as the cut is very clean when you look at it frame by frame
@TheEvilmooseofdoom5 жыл бұрын
There are dropped frames in several spots not just there.
@toddjohnson56925 жыл бұрын
I thought they had added more pre-launch hydrogen burn off capability to reduce the size of the flame that turns the orange covering black on launch. But this one looked like the old style. Or was that planned for later? Just wondering if they had tried to add the flame reduction system and that had affected the previous launch attempt and so they removed it.
@JackieWelles5 жыл бұрын
I wonder does ULA has any plans to launch any reusable rocket like Falcon 9 or upcoming New Glenn rocket? Or is their plan to reduce the cost as much as possible and continue flying in the old way ? awesome video as always btw! 😁
@kristenburnout15 жыл бұрын
They have a method under development called "Smart Reuse" which means dropping off the engine section (which will also include avionics and other expensive stuff) and recover them by a parachute /ballute and grab them with a helicopter (Similar to the way they used to recover film canisters from spy satelites). Sounds crazy, but they think it will work. It will supposedly save 70% of the costs of the first stage without sacrificing much performance, as they don't need to reserve fuel for landing.
@rdfox765 жыл бұрын
@@kristenburnout1 Never sounded crazy to me. It's a logical extension of the stage-and-a-half technology used on the original Atlas to jettison the booster engines, and something that Boeing had proposed for a second order of Saturn Vs to reduce the cost, a stage-and-a-half first stage where the four outboard engines on the first stage would be jettisoned and recovered by parachute for reuse, with the center engine being a sustainer that would be expended along with the stage. It's simple, but that's what makes it so smart; rather than attempt to recover the entire stage like SpaceX, with the attendant payload hit, you recover the expensive bits and replace the cheap part (let's face it, the tanks cost next to nothing to build) instead. There's a place for both--SpaceX's theory of recovering the whole stage allows for rapid reuse, but this is akin to the use of drop tanks on aircraft; it gains *most* of the advantages, at a minor cost in replacing the expended tanks that you jettison. (After all, fuel tank sections are something well-suited to mass production, so they could easily have a stockpile of them ready for having recovered power sections mounted for use.)
@geertwilders31615 жыл бұрын
Nice video
@Yaivenov3 жыл бұрын
What would be the specific impulse for an RL10 and its tidy expander cycle switched over to the unholy mixture of liquid fluorine and liquid hydrogen?
@karstenschuhmann83345 жыл бұрын
Dear Scott, i have one question regarding the Atlas HLV and Delta 4 Heavy. Wouldn't it be more useful to combine one delta central stage with two Atlas booster stage. This would combine the higher thrust of the Atlas at the start with the higher specific impulse of the Delta later in flight.
@tanksandturtles11315 жыл бұрын
Cool
@bradallen18323 жыл бұрын
"Landing on the Mun"
@giglefreakz5 жыл бұрын
Question: On the animation shown by ULA, you can see the engine of the main booster stage is without it's white fairing when it shows stage seperation. Does this jettison somewhere in flight?
@shanent57938 ай бұрын
Boiling the hydrogen seems like a really bad idea, the heat capacites are unpredictable, and the resulting gas/liquid mixture can't be good for the turbine. Boiling also limits the chamber pressure to no more than 200 psi so it's unlikely that it would reach the quoted performance. The pressures must have been much higher to allow the supercritical fuel to smoothly expand through the cooling jacket and turbine, as the cycle's name suggests
@eannamcnamara93385 жыл бұрын
Aorojet rocketdyne's KSP couldn't run so they made the engine out of copper to lower the part count by 90%. Now it kinda runs correctly.
@RealityIsTheNow5 жыл бұрын
lol they've been making excellent rocket engines for over 50 years. The RL-10 is one of the greatest engines of all time...it doesn't "kinda run correctly". lol
@eannamcnamara93385 жыл бұрын
@@RealityIsTheNow sorry i accidentally removed KSP
@mauroabidalcarrer40835 жыл бұрын
nice new outro
@Sciolist2 жыл бұрын
5:03 and OMEGA. Curious why it was said like that.
@bartk075 жыл бұрын
Hi! As this launch is discussed, did you see stage 1 engine flame instabilities in the first tens of seconds? Where are they come from?
@Confuseddave5 жыл бұрын
With the nozzle extender, shown at the start of the video, does it link up the plumbing to the brazed pipes, or is it just a passive shell?
@donjones47195 жыл бұрын
I can't imagine how that would work, practically and reliably. The F9 upper stage Merlin has the same actively cooled plumbing (but 3D printed!) bell as the lower stage, but with the big bell extension bolted on. That has no plumbing/cooling. The gasses are expanded/diffuse enough. Don't recall what it's made of.