“Monster” of a turbine …. Glad we got one for the F16 1:5.. thanks Jonathan 🙏🏻
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Oh Yea! The monster is just that!!!! Crazy push!
@kellyrohrbachsbvmhanger9912 Жыл бұрын
I think it should be called Godzilla 🤣
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
@kellyrohrbachsbvmhanger9912 haha! I like it!
@daleyahnke7215 Жыл бұрын
That is Sick!!!!! The one liter test was awesome! Its thirsty!!! LOL Thanks for sharing!!!
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Yea she burns through a TON of fuel at full throttle!
@Axr24have Жыл бұрын
Great vid Jon. Can’t wait to see it in a model.
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Thanks John.
@GiesbertNijhuis10 ай бұрын
Great test. What I always miss in these tests is the airspeed. It always is zero, while during flying there is high airspeed. Makes a big difference.
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Very true but don't have the means to do test runs in an air speed tunnel ufortunately.
@GiesbertNijhuis10 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc A real windtunnel can be a bit much yea. But I'm sure you can blast it with a prop or EDF. You'd be the first to do it! (? as far as I know)
@DakarNick6 ай бұрын
How much of a difference? I watched a video of a turbine engine tech doing testing on full-scale and he said the power difference is negligible between a static test and one at speed.
@GiesbertNijhuis6 ай бұрын
@@DakarNick Really? (link?) Let me rephrase: if there is a big difference in airspeed, in how quickly the air gets in, I would expect a large difference in thrust. But reality is the boss. I have not tested that. Interesting that someone did a real test and not measured a significant difference.
@hamiltonshangar Жыл бұрын
Hey man Overall good vibes and genuine personality on your channel and I love it, along with the planes of course LOL. Cheers man and keep doing what your doing! -Ché
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much!
@michiganengineer8621 Жыл бұрын
I don't remember if you've done this or not but, it would be an interesting comparison in power/run-time numbers between diesel, kerosene and actual jet fuel (for those turbines that can use it anyway). Did I hear that max operating speed correctly, 300meters/sec? That's pushing supersonic there for a model engine. Looking forward to the bird you put that beast in!
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Haven't done a comparison like that yet. Yea crazy the speed and altitude this can opperate at .
@eljaibas16 Жыл бұрын
Warped Perception did a comparison between diesel, hydro diesel, and kerosene I believe. As well as thrust tests and consumption test, highly recommend watching their videos.
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
@@eljaibas16 yea I watched it. Not accurate. All the thrust ratings will be identical but fuel consumption between various fuels will differ slightly
@vrosi1963 Жыл бұрын
Tyler Perry is the only one who can afford jet turbines this size
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
HAHA. Any many others!
@happygilmore210010 ай бұрын
He has converted most of his jet engined models to EDF.
@superskullmaster10 ай бұрын
But he doesn’t use turbines, hasn’t for a while.
@BassMatt197211 ай бұрын
1:10 this type of connector is a "locking" 3 pin XLR (male/female, you can get 5 pin etc, handy for signal/power)
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
🙌
@victorrcjets7660 Жыл бұрын
The beast for a beast😊
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Oh Yea!
@jkepps Жыл бұрын
Very very nice! I have a Kingtech 450 new in box. I'll have to see about doing an unboxing too.
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Cool!
@Speedlimitrc Жыл бұрын
well done .. thanks for video
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@JP-ij6gf Жыл бұрын
Wow, can I have two please. Impressive stuff
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Crazy hey!
@gregtaylor614610 ай бұрын
For the record, the JETCAT P1000 puts out more than double the thrust of this little toy.
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
You bet! And the Swiwin 800 puts out less than the Jetcat 1000.
@pavlosconstantinou92369 ай бұрын
for the record.. the JEtcat is a pro model.. .
@DakarNick6 ай бұрын
Wow, really?
@barkster Жыл бұрын
you have any details on your test stand?
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
Built by RCCUSTOM3DPRINTING.com
@demantoid41810 ай бұрын
😲 WOW
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
😎
@wayneschenk5512 Жыл бұрын
Nice review
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@klausrohrbach6041 Жыл бұрын
The DEMON returns!
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
BOOM!
@kopparsulfat11 ай бұрын
two of those on a cri-cri would be fun
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
HAHA. Agreed! Two on anything would be fun!
@jimtiller523910 ай бұрын
So, an RC aircraft with this engine could make a fairly high speed and with enough fuel could cover a long distance. The question I have is how do you control the flight path?
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Keep it in view always or use UAV Software.
@gregoryh4601 Жыл бұрын
Jonathan. Very impressive Motor and powerful. Jonathan does these Engines run different when in Aircraft? Would a small leaf blower added to the Front change the Performance of your Test? Act like in Jet getting Air Force into Engine?
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Yes for sure run's different in the aircraft. More restrictions possibly in the fuel system, different airflow patterns.
@RicardoRamos-p3v5 ай бұрын
estaria bien registrar los decibeles al 80 y 100% de rpm gracias por la demo practica
@thelightersideofrc4 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@jonkje Жыл бұрын
12A during startup.. lol Big numbers there as well!
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Yea dual ignitors suck the power.
@Portondown10 ай бұрын
How much does it cost for the engine? How much fuel does it use? How much noise does it produce? What is the weight of the engine? How much thrust at normal running speed? Is it possible to reduce the high pitched scream these engines make?
@number40Fan10 ай бұрын
Answers to a couple of your questions were answered in the video.
@kolbevilla4 ай бұрын
A lot, a lot, a lot, a bit, a ton, no.
@Koernell Жыл бұрын
Wow, impressive test, impressive engine. Can you explain how you calculate the maximum flight time for a jet? Or do you always calculate with maximum consumption because of safety reasons? There's no telemetry for the tank capacity, is there?
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Thanks. If you are installing a suitable size engine for the aircraft, generally the first step is to set a timer of 5-6 min on your radio. Fly that time on the maiden and slowly adjust. So if your gear up starts the timer and you land when 6 min is up and you still have 1/4 a tank left. Bump it up to 7 min. Fly that for a few flights and see. Generally after the maiden you will fly more aggressive and use more fuel so adjust as needed. If you 10 flights in and your still landing with 1/3rd tank than but it up 30 seconds. Xicoy telemetry unit will give fuel consumption. Pretty much all other turbines can use the Vspeak unit which will give tank capacity and fuel consumption.
@jayb2617 Жыл бұрын
did it get to to 88lbs of thrust?
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
No It won't unless your at sea level at 15 deg c.
@scott_aero3915 Жыл бұрын
I'd be interested to see fuel consumption rates for say 33% and 66% done in the same way as I imagine most of these engines are not operating at full power all the time (altho these may be used in single flight target drones so they could be).
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Exactly! Once they are at cruising speed and you back down on the throttle the fuel consumption goes way down.
@MAFEEOSO11 ай бұрын
wow, that reminds me of how I used fuel when I had my 57 chevy souped up and running
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
HAHA. No kidding hey! Not fuel efficient at all.
@hubblehosting88626 ай бұрын
I know that you've build the F-14 XXL before. Do you believe that the Swiwin 400 can safely fit in the fuselage?
@thelightersideofrc6 ай бұрын
The 400 is not needed. Twin 300's would be way over powered but fun!
@hubblehosting88626 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc | Copy that. Thanks for the info!
@charlesspringer470910 ай бұрын
Was there a decimal point hidden by that wire? If yes, how did you manage to keep it hidden through the whole test?
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Yes there is a decimal point. It was a stationary camera.
@charlesspringer470910 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrcAnd a very determined wire 😁
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
@charlesspringer4709 🤣🤣
@P51 Жыл бұрын
I'm going to use two of these and make a homebuilt 40% 2-seat HondaJet. 18 gal/hr x 2 = 36 gal/hr or 250 lb/hr.
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Sounds Fun!
@Lightning5467 ай бұрын
I wonder how fast an RC SR-71 would go with two of these and real afterburners in it.
@thelightersideofrc7 ай бұрын
😮😮😮😮💨
@maegenyoungs2591 Жыл бұрын
So when is someone going to build a marine version? To replace the loss of the SMP5 from jetcat
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Good Question!
@Sluf7 Жыл бұрын
Probably bit over kill for the Habu then.....😮. What a BEAST 😊. What ever machine it goes in Full Throttle won,t used as much with thrust like that. That F-16 being pretty clean anyhoo will scoot along. Be well keep at it. 😊
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
HAHA. Weighs more than the Habu I would guess. A true rocket with wings!
@e8guy316 Жыл бұрын
@@thelightersideofrcat that point it would just be a turbine with wings 😂😂😂
@uuzd4s10 ай бұрын
Unlike Full Scale Turbines where the support bearings are oiled using a Labyrinth seal design, R/C Turbines use an Open design that rely on the Oil mixed w/ the Kerosene to supply the needed Lubricants. You run out of fuel and you run out of Bearing Lube. At 10,000 RPM a bearing can overheat quickly without lubricant. I wouldn't recommend what you've done here on Any R/C Turbine, especially a New one.
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
What I have done here is exactly how they are designed to operate! Thank you for watching!
@RangoliDesigns-jg8mw11 ай бұрын
Total thrust ??? Of 400 Jet engine
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
One we ran the other day got 90.25 lbs output
@terryperrott9913 Жыл бұрын
"" if "" there ever was a A-6 Intruder big enough that would be a monster of a Intruder, it would look great in the air.
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Oh Yea!
@jtuttle11 Жыл бұрын
Is your 'Fuel' mixed with Lubricant?
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Yes. Most turbines use a %5 oil mixed into fuel.
@joesutherland22510 ай бұрын
Turboprops? Generator? Nat gas? Microgenerators is my thought maybe small property owners could setone up and produce theyre own power and sell into the grid to offset costs over time just a thought .
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
and thats how innovation and invention happens!
@joesutherland22510 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc if I had the cash I'd try it .electrician so that side is covered but I know squat about the prime mover side of the unit
@joesutherland22510 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc it would have to be natural gas due to availability to most homeowners basically the same as big powerplants do now but on a micro scale
@KILLER_CUSTOM_RC Жыл бұрын
Think the KT450 is the biggest available to purchase for general public.
@jonkje Жыл бұрын
Swiwin has an 800 though...
@davewilshere Жыл бұрын
JetCat have a 400, 500 and 550….
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Lots of options.
@donstor110 ай бұрын
Man i wish you would give the stats in imperial units. I have no idea about max speed or fuel consumption. I don’t get micro liters or any of that. Pounds, miles or knots please.
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
😂😂 Can all be easily converted with "GOOGLE!"
@robertorlt8 ай бұрын
HELO HOW CAN I ORDER ONE OR TWO ENGINES LIKE THAT ONE??
@thelightersideofrc8 ай бұрын
Send me an email or order off my website. Thelightersideofrc.com
@ericmartin24704 ай бұрын
the life of this kind of engine is roughly 20 hours? i assume the engine can be serviced at 20 hours and put back into use. is this something the owner can do with an overhaul kit?
@thelightersideofrc4 ай бұрын
25hr. Bearings get changed and back in service. Done at factory or dealer.
@jaimesarabia98303 ай бұрын
Hey man i hope you can answer this... Which is YOUR most expensive airplane and whats the price tag? people always post videos of so called $90,000 $100,000 worth airplanes being crashed. These are not scratch builds but purchased ARF. and im trying to "build" one but seems around $70,000 tops. thanks
@thelightersideofrc3 ай бұрын
The most expensive one to date was probably the F14 XXL. Comes in around 40k complete. The upcoming XXL F4 from carf will probably be 50K.
@areprasetyo2 ай бұрын
The price please
@thelightersideofrc2 ай бұрын
Feel free to visit my website, click on shop and check current price!
@areprasetyo2 ай бұрын
Thanks
@BibekMandal-h6v3 ай бұрын
Is it delivered in Nepal I want this jet engine.
@thelightersideofrc2 ай бұрын
Probably.
@DanielLyon-xg7uh9 ай бұрын
How do I buy 3
@thelightersideofrc9 ай бұрын
Send me an email. thelightersideofrc@gmail.com
@marksmadhousemetaphysicalm29386 ай бұрын
Could probably run a small one person jet with two of these…
@thelightersideofrc6 ай бұрын
Yes for sure! They also make a SWIWIN 800 turbine!
@marksmadhousemetaphysicalm29386 ай бұрын
I can see an affordable jet for two people built using 4 of these on the wings, 100 liter tank should allow at least 1,000 km and simple pressurization system…the four engines could power IFR and the most basic weather radar…less than 200k … way cheaper than the 2 mil. for an Eclipse 500 or Cirrius Vision Jet
@kolbevilla4 ай бұрын
@@marksmadhousemetaphysicalm2938the only issue is the service interval on these is 25 hours, and they are not built to be as reliable as an aviation grade engine
@jefffff100711 ай бұрын
300 m/sec, 671 mph!🤔😳
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
CRAZY HEY!
@Gavs_rc_hobbies Жыл бұрын
No matter how many times i watch these test videos, it still blows my mind how fast these engines burn through 1L of fuel. 🤯
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
I know! Crazy Hey!
@jrkc92183 ай бұрын
I’m ignorant. How much does that translate to horsepower or a comparable to a car? I know they aren’t or can’t be directly converted
@thelightersideofrc3 ай бұрын
Good questions. As you said, not directly translatable but with something like this it is a 400N engine which translates to 40kg of push which is 40 x 2.2 = 88lbs of push at sea level at 15C
@chadshumaker498411 ай бұрын
Just wondering how much that beast cost? I'm guessing 6 to 7 thousand.
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
The Monster is currently listed on my site for $6566.00
@okiedoak20120 күн бұрын
These are still single compressor designs correct....
@KCM25NJL9 ай бұрын
"Maximum speed of 300m/s....which is fast" Yeah, 43 short of Supersonic lol
@thelightersideofrc9 ай бұрын
😉😊
@kthan34275 ай бұрын
engine was not shutdown at empty fuel tank very short time, its so unusual ??
@thelightersideofrc5 ай бұрын
Sorry don't understand your question.
@Wherestherum-e6v2 ай бұрын
Can this power and ultra light airplane
@thelightersideofrc2 ай бұрын
Could.
@adampool10011 ай бұрын
Was just short of pushing 1000lbs that’s a lot of power
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
👹👹
@jayb2617 Жыл бұрын
if it loses 14% at your level how much does it lose at 25,000 ft?
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
LOTS! Just like the full size.
@s9523pink Жыл бұрын
Gulp😮!😮😢❤
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
😂
@Sumonkhandker11 ай бұрын
Please please and please Sir what is the price of this jet engine
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
Look at my site.
@Sumonkhandker11 ай бұрын
Sir, the engine that is in the video
@Mark-y5h5p26 күн бұрын
How much are they .tia
@MohammedIbrahim-bz8ys8 ай бұрын
This engine how can fit it in the motorcycle
@thelightersideofrc8 ай бұрын
Haha. Could!
@cersos10 ай бұрын
If you're curious, 300 meters p/s = 671 mph
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Phew! FAST!
@themagicartroll89618 ай бұрын
Its 88lb thrust but why showing upto 500lb
@thelightersideofrc8 ай бұрын
Decimal place.
@themagicartroll89618 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc oh ok😂. And I wanna buy this for a university final project could you reduce the cost
@themagicartroll89618 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc I can show a Collab. That the jet engine came from you and kind of a sponsored Collab it will increase your viewership and popularity on both sides
@Prideforall5 ай бұрын
jet engine SW400pro price bangladesh
@thelightersideofrc5 ай бұрын
Check out my website
@Kostya_bro10 ай бұрын
Not most powerful, SWIWIN have jet engine for 80 kg of thrust.
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Correct!
@basantd-j4n6 ай бұрын
Sw800pro review
@winibaldcroux2000Ай бұрын
AMT Turbines have a 1590N thrust turbine in their line of engines. It's huge 😮
@adamfrbs925910 ай бұрын
I'll be the first to admit I'm full 'tarded with money, but even I can't pull the trigger on one of these, so damn cool, but ridiculously expensive.
@thelightersideofrc9 ай бұрын
Very addicting!
@adamfrbs92599 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc 4 of them on an ultralight would be awesome lol.
@beyond8981 Жыл бұрын
Max Speed = 330m/s = 670 MPH.... Wow...
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Crazy hey! And operation at 30k ft!
@seamuscashin2606 Жыл бұрын
a pw6 engine would not use much more ie 12 gallons per hr .t would take a hell of a plane to hold that much fuel and use this engine for 1hr
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Oh yea! No kidding! Once your at cruise speed, altitude the throttle stick can be backed off.
@janmb Жыл бұрын
"The Most Powerful Model Turbine?" While 400N is a fairly large turbine as RC turbines go, it is less than half of the most powerful COTS turbine for RC currently.
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
I guess it's not!
@warriordrum10 ай бұрын
No expert here but it sure seems a lot can go wrong during the testing. Your standing inches away from an intensely precise machine run by jet fuel. I would be behind an inch of clear something.
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Same type of thing when it's in our aircraft flying. We do have a save zone which is a 1/2 circle from beside to behind the turbine for 30 ft in all directions.
@TalenHavens-ky5sc9 ай бұрын
Wtf almost 8000 dollars how do you have that kind of money
@thelightersideofrc9 ай бұрын
What about the 20k jet it’s going in!?
@TalenHavens-ky5sc9 ай бұрын
That's more then a car dang
@matthewspaccarelli500710 ай бұрын
Shouldn't a good review also include the cost of the product you are reviewing?
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Not if the price is constantly changing. Then you can say well just say "At the time of making this video the price is...." Well if the retail price goes up then that causes issues as well. If you want to see the current price, click the link to the engine in the video description.
@Prideforall5 ай бұрын
jet engine SW400pro price Uss $.... ples
@thelightersideofrc5 ай бұрын
Listed on my website!
@HDSME3 ай бұрын
25 hr service life???? Then what?
@thelightersideofrc3 ай бұрын
Bearings get changed, Engine gets re balanced and it goes back into service for another 25 hours.
@HDSME3 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc thank you
@Ray88G10 ай бұрын
You can get much better efficiency out of hydrogen electric .
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
Yes, These mini turbines are not efficient at all.
@Turbojetkart11 ай бұрын
my engine makes 3 times that..... and cost a lot less to build
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
Sweet! Never heard of your engines? I'm guessing you don't make them for RC Aviation?
@Turbojetkart11 ай бұрын
@thelightersideofrc It could be used in an RC craft..... but 300lbs of thrust dry..... with out the afterburner.... who knows..... it would be some RC project...... not heard of yours before , but we learn something new every day....
@vazione54109 ай бұрын
But isn’t yours much heavier andy?
@Turbojetkart9 ай бұрын
@@vazione5410 could be made lighter, its first one...... am working with a compant to use them in small aircraft, as it will run for thousand of hours with out issue
@rolfbiber35039 ай бұрын
I have seen 85 lb for a very short time but never 40 kg of thrust. Not very impressive
@thelightersideofrc9 ай бұрын
😱
@philjac94 Жыл бұрын
Hardly the most powerful, advertise d as a 400N should see 88lbs not 75lbs/340N
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
Absolutely incorrect! Reason being. We are at 3300ft above sea level. At sea level at 15c you will get rated power. At 3300 ft significant reduction
@philjac94 Жыл бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc Even if you said 3% per 1000 feet, the engine falls short of the stated power.
@opieshomeshop10 ай бұрын
We’re in America, drop the Celsius BS.
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
I'm in Canada! I use Celcius!
@opieshomeshop10 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrc Its LAAAAAAME!
@thelightersideofrc10 ай бұрын
@@opieshomeshop totally 👍
@mauricegold937710 ай бұрын
You might be in America. America is not the world. You are statistically less than 4% of world population by number, but 500% or more by perceived entitlement.
@wrenchg3954 Жыл бұрын
AARRRRRGGGG!!!!! ITS NOT AN ENGINE!!!!! ITS A TURBINE
@alonsoparra4359 Жыл бұрын
A turbine is a type of engine
@demondoggy1825 Жыл бұрын
It's not an engine, it's a 347 Chevy smallblock
@edwinthomas618 Жыл бұрын
Its not a radio...its a transmitter😅
@thelightersideofrc Жыл бұрын
😂😂. Reminds me of it's not a build, it's an assembly......it's not an assembly it's a build....
@malloyneil4011 ай бұрын
Please! Please! Please! For the love of god, please stop saying that turbine engines loose 10/15 % power at 3000 ft. That is the most ignorant thing I have heard on KZbin in a long time. No turbine engines do not loose 10-15% power at 3000 ft. If that were even close to being true no airline would or even could use a turbine engine. High temperatures play a much greater impact on power output than altitude below 10,000 ft. Please do some homework on this subject before repetitively saying completely erroneous things in every single one of your videos. In reality the power change from sea level to 3000 ft it’s doubtful that you could detect it even with very expensive highly accurate instruments. So, please stop!
@thelightersideofrc11 ай бұрын
Bahaha! Ok. I’ll just ignore physics and density altitude! Thanks for watching!
@terke123011 ай бұрын
@@thelightersideofrcIF, at sea level, you have RPM and EGT headroom at rated thrust, you have a de-rated engine. In that case @malloyneil40 is correct. You could use some of that headroom to get back up to rated thrust at the lower density altitude of your shop. If you not not have those de-rates, then a turbine is simply a naturally aspirated engine and thus looses thrust with loss of density altitude. @malloyneil40 probably needs to study his material a little more to understand what he is saying. Keep up the great work.