💡 Short Frontend Snacks (Tips) every week here: Twitter - twitter.com/DecodedFrontend Instagram - instagram.com/decodedfrontend LinkedIn - www.linkedin.com/in/dmezhenskyi
@MrKOHKyPEHT Жыл бұрын
0:33 that was exact my reaction :D
@gonzalocorchon6509 Жыл бұрын
Another great video, you never fail to surprise me with your content. You're becoming the "source of truth" in the Angular world.
@chengxiaoxia8046 Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much. You continue uploading great tutorial videos. You always give a clear explanation of the abstract concept. Your pronunciation becomes far better than one year ago. Congrats
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
I am glad to hear that! Thank you for the feedback 😊
@chekitdnb Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your support! I appreciate it soo much :)
@PauloSantos-yu1tn Жыл бұрын
Very cool new features.
@souravjana83125 ай бұрын
Great video. clear everything now
@malekitani3136 Жыл бұрын
nice indepth explanation, thank you. keep it up
@innocentmazando3808 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for a great lesseon @Dmytro. Thanks for giving us the context on the use case of the DestroyRef, cant wait to push our company projects to Angular v16 to try this staff
@volodimiryemshyn715 Жыл бұрын
good approach thanks you for your examples
@chengxiaoxia8046 Жыл бұрын
Merci!
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
Wow, thank you so much for your support 🙏 it is invaluable 😊
@huytranthanh9029 Жыл бұрын
time to drop some 3rd libs, thank you for sharing
@demidovmaxim1008 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video!
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this comment :)
@ilyatelefus3647 Жыл бұрын
Great video as always 👍🏼
@MrKOHKyPEHT Жыл бұрын
I should definitely add this video into favourites. Too much useful information for me. Especially considering that our project gonna be updated to Angular v16
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Glad you like it :)
@03mylol Жыл бұрын
how does destroyRef understands when to destroy? For example, at the 4:58, we use it as outter function but it somehow understands when our component destroyed
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
it is because inject() function is called in context of component and tries to resolve the "closest" provider for DestroyRef token which comes from component injector, so it gets the reference to the DestroyRef accosiated with this component.
@loko1944 Жыл бұрын
As always tons of awesome info and as always I learned something completely not relevant to this topic. Didn't know we can call baseComponent's method by using super.... I think this is the problem for many self learners - sometimes we just miss something completely
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
Thank you! I am glad you like it :)
@pdela72 Жыл бұрын
Will certainly experiment with this later today, but do you already know if destroyref can be used inside any class (non angular decorated class, not a component, nor directive, etc.) like i e. a User class, to perform clean up logic when the class instance is destroyed?
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
As far as I know it won't work with a regular class. You would need to annotate it with @Injectable() because otherwise you won't be able to inject into this class anything (including the DestroyRef)
@pdela72 Жыл бұрын
@@DecodedFrontend Thanks. Haven't tried myself yet, but I bet you are right. I'm using classes that extends FormGroups or FormArray to encapsulate business logic in it. Sometimes I have to subscribe to observables inside the class, thus I have the problem of manually unsubscribing from outside the class when a control is removed from the form... Do you think decorating them as @Injectable could lead to performance issues? I might have several of these controls in a single form.
@krzysztofprzybylski2750 Жыл бұрын
Nice feature. And a useful one. Also a great explanation! I have a question though: I was taught to use "subscription.add(observable)" and then call "subscription.unsubscribe()" in ngOnDestroy. That is all instead of "takeUntill" pattern. Is there a difference between those two? If so then what is it and why use one over the other?
@innocentmazando3808 Жыл бұрын
Hey, not Dymtro here but here is my 2 cents. So takeUntil can be used even in instances where you do not want to destroy the component specifically. Last time I did so was when I was refreshing a page by button clicks. So when I click the refresh button the system had to stop all running http calls to the backend and restart again. So on the forkJoin making the calls I piped the takeUntil such that when I click the button, the subject emits first then calls cancel and then I would run the fetches again. In short, takeUntil allows you to destroy observables even without destroying the component
@luischavez190 Жыл бұрын
That intro 😂 good explanation thanks
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
Thanks :)
@ADITYABADDUR Жыл бұрын
Which is better to use: takeUntilDestroyed() or DestroyRef, and why?
@kramatanga Жыл бұрын
How to open rxjs operators implementation code ?
@chandanamadurangamunasingh6498 Жыл бұрын
Hey, is it reasonable to move to Angular 16, Do all libraries support Angular 16
@shayanghazali Жыл бұрын
i have a question and it is not about this video. - how can i make @angular/core package local in my angular project and use it as a local package in my project? , so that i can discover more in it also work on it
@magda77850 Жыл бұрын
takeUntilDestroyed is something we really needed to remove a lot of boilerplate code :D
@gagiksimonyan3782 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for another useful video, Dmytro and especially for Khaby Lame part)
@DecodedFrontend Жыл бұрын
Thank you, Gagik! ;)
@mkez0017 ай бұрын
Why don't we need to put DestroyRef in providers array?
@DecodedFrontend7 ай бұрын
Angular resolves it automatically under the hood, so you don't have to provide it manually each time. The same is true for ViewContainerRef, ElementRef, and some other tokens.
@brucearmstrong5536 Жыл бұрын
idk what they are trying to do with this feature though to be honest, reducing boilerplate ? the custom function .onDestroy for this reference feature is unnecessarily complex to be frank hope they dont remove onDestroy lifecycle hook i don't mind adding a boiler plate for subject and function
@adambickford8720 Жыл бұрын
Maybe I'm missing something, but this feels terrible. It's basically inheritance in disguise and now mandates angular for even simple object creation due to injection coupling.
@pedrinhofernandes Жыл бұрын
It's is a good "native" replacement for www.npmjs.com/package/@ngneat/until-destroy Looking forward to replace it once our project migrates to v16