The new G-Shock Mudman GW-9500 is a no-fuss tool watch

[@Vian_Cheung]

Love the orange GW-9500-1A4JF negative display . The watch really comfortable on wrist as it is not bulky compare to other G-Shock models.

[@3000spills]

I haven't taken my 9500 off since I got it 3 months ago. Rangeman + Mudman + Protrek = Mudman 9500

[@A._.A._.]

which colour did you buy? Thinking to buy the green with negative display

[@3000spills]

@A._.A._. I bought the black one with the positive face.

[@spirg]

Love the size !!!! Awesome Watch !!!

[@jodyfinley9122]

Just purchased my own recently and it's absolutely amazing, live it love it

[@davidcallan7844]

THE KING GXW56BB1JF or GX56BB1 or the KING with positive display is even more no fuss without all the bells and whistles you only need if you’re coast guard or special forces. Oh and at $300-$400 less. Includes MUD RESIST, TOUGH SOLAR and MULTI 6 for $200-$250 usd, is 55.5mm x 53.5mm x 17.5mm also a direct lineage to the original square 5000 series.

[@bobpage6597]

I don't have any issues at all with the negative display - and its the same for my Rangeman Blackout. I look at the watch face and can see the numbers clearly regardless of conditions - I oft think some people just like to complain 😂😂 I also had a Suunto Core All Black which has a negative display - no issues there either aha!

[@emdblyou]

All those features and for that price you'd think they would include a sapphire glass.

[@segundoprinconv5743]

Buenas noches compa, como reconoer si es original y cuando cuesta desde Venezuela

[@Gaaaaaaaaaaad]

Love it

[@jonsant7232]

Looks great but it would look ridiculous on my wrist 😢 I'm currently looking for a G-Shock for my collection but it won't be this one

[@David.Horne72]

Os your wrist smaller than 6 and a half inch?

[@jonsant7232]

@@David.Horne72 not far away 170mm or 6¾" in your language my right (none watch) wrist is 180mm or 7⅛" cheers David

[@KC-rn3bd]

its so beautilful, its hard for me to take it out the box after i calllibrated everything. put it right back in XD

[@mikeyblueeyes8449]

Personally I prefer the g9300 it looks more manly in my opinion

[@CN_1908]

You'll cry in remote area with that display... Trust me you will

[@gianpakasa]

Never seen one, in real life 😅😅

[@Timeandtidewatches]

They're still fairly new so there's a good chance they're still trickling down to dealers. They're available online

[@jijoious]

Please make it more smaller & not too flashy from a distance of 2km🙏🏻

[@martintoenoe]

Its only for real men sir.. so no they wont do smaller

[@mikeyblueeyes8449]

Dont do that..

[@bobpage6597]

*Because Casio are just waiting to find your comment and then do exactly what you say 🤦‍♂🤣🤣

[@kms08711]

​@@martintoenoe'for real men' 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 58mm for giants maybe It should be 46mm at least

[@RabbitWatchShop]

People clown Invicta for making large wristwatches, but they give G-Shocks a pass. That is simply too huge. I had a rangeman I purchased in 2014. It looked like a clown watch due to the abnormal large size. Why can’t they make tough feature rich midsize models, especially considering Japanese men have petite frames?

[@Spectral_Alien]

The watch is made with people who wear a dive suit or a space suit in mind. Even the exposed screw is by design.

[@RabbitWatchShop]

@@Spectral_Alien that’s fine. I’m not arguing that it shouldn’t exist. Men on average don’t have tiny wrist like I do. I’m just asking for midsize g-shocks with the same features

[@Spectral_Alien]

@@RabbitWatchShop That was sarcasm. The watch is not designed for such purpose. But yes it is sad, if only they made the watch thinner it would have a wider audience. After a certain age, unless a person is huge pulling it off with any attire is hard.

[@RabbitWatchShop]

@@Spectral_Alien oops 😬 🙊 I’m not good with sarcasm 😆

[@shotgunmcshotgun1142]

G shocks are supposed to be big that's their style

[@mikeyblueeyes8449]

1 major weakness...the screen is recessed enough it's destined to get scratched up.

[@freddykelly4405]

You can get a crystal saver on Amazon

[@17cmmittlererminenwerfer81]

Why do Ozzies say Jew-plex when trying to say duplex? (iss juss ow we speak, mayt) Yeah great. But that's not the question. The question is: why do you insist on pronouncing words objectively incorrectly?

[@mikeyblueeyes8449]

Mate who Cares ?...I think there's more important things to worry about than a mispronouced word;)

[@mickyss7766]

Cause we can now f off

[@kms08711]

G shocks are so big wtf are they even thinking? What's wrong with making them 46 or 44? 😂 what the fuxk is with their +50mm watches? And you say tool watch 😂😂😂😂 they are so big it gets stuck on everything The worst tool watch ever