The Newest US Aircraft Carrier Is Ready For Battle!

[@PanzerWeeb3305]

Wait until CVN-80 rolls out. LONG LIVE THE ENTERPRISE!!!

[@jeffmckissock4560]

Don't forget about the support ships oilers and store ships. I served on an oiler. While the ship is nuclear the aircraft still need fuel, and the crew still needs to eat. The Navy's service force is lacking.

[@deltasi7270]

I missed them in my rant . My sincere apologies sir. Darren🇬🇧

[@daviddrotar410]

I am very excited about the brand new CVN-79 John F. Kennedy supercarrier entering our fleet in 2025! Our new supercarrier will have the latest state of the art radar, sonar, both the F-35- Lighting B and our FA-18-Super Hornets. A 90 jet air wing, including Starkofski helicopters for anti-submarine warfare. The latest anti-missle & drone defense systems. The most efficient power plant with two Bechtel nuclear reactors pumping out over 78 megawatts of power for lazer guided weapons, more spacious cabins for our sailors and the most powerful aircraft carrier in the fleet. DD. 🇺🇸🇻🇮

[@joneltorregosa51]

Super carrier does not carry F-35B. It does carry F-35-C.

[@dougpierson1178]

I'm unfamiliar with "Starkofski". Are you sure you didn't mean Sikorsky?

[@azazza53]

@@dougpierson1178 Yeh, "both" of them! LOL!

[@USNveteran]

There is a reason why in times of national emergency one of the first questions out of the President's mouth is "Where are the carriers"? Also don't forget the times when they have provided humanitarian relief. Thanks to all now serving, those who have, and those who will in the future. FLY NAVY!!!

[@bfelten1]

How does a $13B mobile airbase help with a *national* emergency? It's purely for offensive operations overseas, a long way from the nation it's supposed to defend. The Empire strikes back...

[@robwagnon6578]

We don't know what kind of new technology will be theorized, tested and or developed in ten to twenty years into the future. Maybe things that would have our jaws drop now:) Hopefully that will keep us at peace through strength!!

[@DonAbrams-hq7ln]

True, as long as we have a government that supports our military. NO MORE WOKENESS. SEMPER FI GO PETE

[@thomasD215]

​@@DonAbrams-hq7lnBiden was "THE" president for wokeness, Good riddance!!! 🖕

[@garnetmichel5517]

Decrease land bases increase ships and spend less money in the long run , keep Japan bases , Guam and England ,Germany.a few other outliers due to location scrap the rest ,NATO can float the bill for the Americans in Europe

[@Ralfi_PoELA]

You just literally named all the main land bases high speed. 🤦🏾‍♂️ Leave Europe they should be capable to hold their own. The Asian bases make sense because those nations are our main trading partners and we were on friendly terms longer than the once before European empires that didn't even respect the US as a global power just wanted bodies and our manufacturing.

[@Ghettodachoppa87-kf6ml]

NATO can float the bill for everything and North America can just let Europe deal with Europe I say.

[@MultiCconway]

Although the CVN-78 FORD Class Carriers are turning out to be very capable as indicated for FORD's first extended deployment . . . they are EXTREMELY expensive . . . and unlike all other naval vessels constructed there seems to be NO LEARNING CURVE in their construction! Where does the money go?

[@DavidAllen-dj7sd]

Not really! Just look at all the free aid being spent on the Ukraine.

[@HowardTowe]

He who carries the Biggest stick makes the rules! Lol

[@Tommy71998]

WILD IRON! GREAT PRESENTATION

[@chit4luck]

Didn’t need a history lesson. Stop wasting time and stick to what the subject implies.

[@PAUL-em4tj]

They all do that. It pisses me off.

[@esterledesma9849]

howdiduknow re history lesson unless u watched till end? trying to sound smart?

[@g2vision839]

Maybe he knows more than those who we still server or have served... With respect in behave of LCDR River NSWC. Lol ... Great article!

[@sandralogue1774]

There are those of us who appreciate the information,not to mention no one is forcing you to watch. Veteran,USN,1990-1996

[@chit4luck]

@ , To each, his/her own. However, it could be elaborated better in the title. Just my opinion. US Army 1966 - 1969.

[@oneshotme]

Everything is easier the second time you do it. No matter what it is that you learned how to on the first one

[@pashon4percushon]

I wish some of the workers would believe that. instead of having to go back and redo their work.

[@BillMallett]

Love the Aircraft Carriers, well worth the cost.

[@mikelucas7171]

They are already bloody amazing! Here in the UK we say we have the best but that's def not the case!

[@thomasodonnell2187]

A nice & precise summary, THANK YOU😁💜

[@davepaulik7414]

Awesome video❤

[@richardlinn5512]

Need to put these reactors on more ships, in regional areas of the Country.

[@michaelcopper7635]

I like all military items that give the USA Absolute Dominate, Safety & security. So I love Aircraft carriers !! But we need to come up with a catapult system 😅for propulsion to move faster slicker in the water without propellers or screws !!😢 Then we should also come up with, and this is a big one space aircraft carrier !!😮

[@timothyfoster7564]

the navy needs more service ships, along with amphibious ships, and 2more aircraftcarres, and 4 more land bases.

[@rochellpacunana7568]

we need a F-1 that is the fastest, strongest, most stealth, and can carry ICBM'S

[@rochellpacunana7568]

😀😀😀⚒️

[@terrencemccoy8219]

07Dec2019, John F. Kennedy (CVN 79) was christened at Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding (HII-NNS) 16Dec2019, moved from Dry Dock 12 to Pier 3, where the ship would undergo final completion and outfitting 11 Feb2022 scheduled to projected to begin testing Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) in later 2022 Feb-the end of Apr2024 dead load testing and the first sleds were shot off the deck Schedule 31 Jul2025, planned delivery USS John F. Kennedy (CVN 79) will operate in the Indo-Pacific region~Go! Navy clip

[@terrencemccoy8219]

What's an "F-1", I only now it as the JASDF fighter jet designation

[@michaelwilichoski3038]

Zumwalts found a new purpose. A stealth hypersonic naval platform is a game changer!

[@kevinh5349]

Yeah, that was clever. Change the mission if you got it wrong in the first place. One thing I don't like it the trend to reduce crew size with technology - supposedly. Someone is still needed to do the maintenance, load stores, etc. That takes actual manpower.

[@farshadmn4273]

at 09:02 what is that like a B2, is it a drone or what ?

[@Chuck59ish]

Great concept as long as the escorts don't shoot the aircraft out of the sky., as in U.S.S. Gettysburg and the U.S.S. Harry Trueman before Christmas.

[@pugmom1958]

Yea baby, yea! CVN 67 has been a part of my life since it's commissioning many years ago.. I was with Big John in July in Philly. Im love you and send my best to your crew! CVN 79 JFK keep us safe!

[@masnur7007]

Safe from whom? 5,000 Nukes and you're still NOT safe?

[@TheServal]

CVA 67. the N is for nuclear, which the original JFK was conventional with boilers.

[@go818win]

Battleships had long been obsolete since the second war ...

[@Rocketjay12]

Looks like it just came from the “Pimp My Carrier”shop! Well done! 😉

[@MatthewSmith-w5j]

What will happen if someone sets off an emp device near our new electronic carrier

[@Ghettodachoppa87-kf6ml]

NATO needs to find roads to use in case airfields and aircraft carriers are not available. There are more missiles than airfields and aircraft carriers.

[@herbieschwartz9246]

Bigger boats have always been the portrayal of military power. Technology has however, rendered them simply bigger, more prestigious targets. IMO

[@benny14993]

New Year talking about new war not peace. Sound like US is showing its hegemony , war monger mentality. Good for nothing country .

[@Bduh2]

I hope I live long enough to see an actual working electromagnetic "force field" protecting an aircraft carrier from any incoming missiles. Yeah, I'm an STTNG fanatic but hey, they're working on laser guns now so, why not?

[@pashon4percushon]

it was just in the news the other day, the rail gun been scrapped. Too powerful to cost ratio

[@thomasdavis2072]

I was on an ammo ship during the Vietnam war, without support ships the Navy can't stay on station for indefinite periods of time. We rely to much on civilian ships to supply our ships at sea and from what i read recently there only 8 ships to support our ships world wide.

[@markjohnson6194]

Don't let the USS Gettysburg near it, that air wing will be toast

[@GeorgeDoughty-m8e]

....and no defense from hypersonic missiles. One ship=several $ billion. One missile = $2 million. Go broke quickly like that.

[@josephtempongko8914]

What newest aircraft carrier?

[@chriswharton]

Very impressive. I just hope your new president won’t use it to threaten allies and friends.

[@LuckyDaze76]

This dudes voice sounds like Kermit the frog

[@jimmorano2589]

The costs of CVN 78 and CVN 79 are reversed in the video.

[@BenjaminTurnerAUS]

They need a way of intercepting a torpedo

[@Angelwr1luv]

They call us a cruiser.

[@jakekiser6348]

Alright, I’ll pay my taxes…

[@wasacero1979]

USA..USA..USA.. LET'S GO OUR ARMED FORCES...🙏 🇺🇸🇵🇷🇨🇴 Let's all stand and give Donald a round of applause..

[@BobSchofield-el4hj]

Newport News Shipbuilding Virginia..the ONLY site in the frigging WORLD who build these fantastic warships..Salute my brothers and sisters...go red next time 😍

[@burstn2flames]

How will this fair against EMPs❤

[@johndavis2938]

How come it doesn't have spinners?

[@tankthebear]

I want a ride on that carrier so bad .....

[@nasedo3129]

Can't wait for the Donald J. Trump!

[@mikesalt8248]

Neither can He !

[@noahnitikman2436]

So it can be rage first aircraft carrier in history to be impeached?

[@olymbitis]

It will be painted orange

[@paulhudson8321]

You have to have served in the armed services to have a ship named after you.

[@nasedo3129]

@@paulhudson8321 Does Commander in Chief count?

[@TAC-k9n]

I was on the big John when it was CV -67

[@texasblessed8270]

Came to watch about new air craft carrier...got history lesson...I go look up the new ship somewhere else

[@thomasdavis2072]

We have let our Naval forces get to old as far as support ships as well as destroyers who protect the task forces. Our problem is the low number of skilled workers as well as to few ship yards to build our ships. In short our Navy vessels in many cases are lacking new technology to meet future needs.

[@chikinhsieh1503]

Dear USA, please double up yr minitary budget, you need to protect the world against Russia and China!

[@chikinhsieh1503]

Pls reduce the spending on your citizens, pls put more effort to protect Philippines and Ukraine

[@JamieChapinDamelosJJParanormal]

Sucks we laundered a $hitton of our equipment to Ukra. (which also armed a lot of terrorist organizations. They had more rifles than they knew what to do with and we're selling them to France. Iran got night optics.(I have to double check it was one of them that never had the advantage of the night strike because they didn't have the night optics and then we just pretty much gave it to them) We got down to two weeks worth of long range missiles in case we had a protect our self against the strike from China like a year and a half ago or longer. They keep sending stuff so I have no idea how fast they keep making it I hear that we have to beg for an allies for certain things now . Biden used all the reserve fuel for our military to bring the gas prices down. They completely sabotaged our military and our national security.

[@JamieChapinDamelosJJParanormal]

@@chikinhsieh1503 sorry we need to take care of Home first and we're suffering as a result of handing out to everybody else. Time we take care of ourselves now.

[@FrancisOpiyo-mq5bi]

Don't Worry , Russia no longer pose any threat , already she is trying to swallow what her throat cannot accommodate, Ukraine!

[@FrancisOpiyo-mq5bi]

For the Chinese, I guess they need the world more than the world need them from their survival and protection from roge states like North Korea and China

[@Ghettodachoppa87-kf6ml]

Army of people operating a army of drones, when their drone is done they use another.

[@jamescanterbury6634]

What about emp and all this

[@richardlinn5512]

Worry about Juicy Target !

[@georgeryan7615]

Is that oversize twilights on our monster 😂

[@victorteo4783]

Can they evades Hypersonic? They’re floating coffins!

[@raymondcook8364]

China is learning a lot from these videos.

[@koookooo-ww8kv]

မြန်မာနှိင်ငံကိုယ်လည်း လာခဲ့အုံးလေ လေ့လာလို့ရအောင်လို့ပါ 👍✌

[@robrutschow1397]

Hypersonic missiles make aircraft carriers obsolete, and a liability.

[@paulgilliland2992]

12 billion. Whoa

[@stfuplsok]

Oreshnik is waiting for the testing for that boat.

[@willhaveall]

We ready!!

[@joe5431]

Where is the space force?

[@BrendonCoss-e5w]

Walk softly and carry a big stick

[@dragonslayer1294]

Don’t need it no more wars

[@jamesm267]

If the USN had had half the money wasted in Ukraine, we could have built 6 or more of these carriers already.

[@bigfatstupidfish2397]

Simply not true. Aid sent to Ukraine isn't literal dollars, but the estimated value of equipment we already had, such as bombs that were expired/going to be expired soon.

[@MrChiangching]

Why waste our money on the military at all, much less for obsolete aircraft carriers?

[@toddbearden7251]

Yeah but if that was the case Russia wouldn’t have lost 500,000 troops and loads of hardware. As a side, I’m starting to think China is a paper tiger and doesn’t pose any threat at all. So, I think Russia was our biggest competitor all along - not much of a threat anymore though, after Ukraine drained them for 2 years. Putin is tough (for a little guy) but he doesn’t seem very smart, just a tough guy

[@douglasskaalrud6865]

Like being on your knees to Putin like trump does?

[@wolfgong2344]

remember you manipulated Ukraine to hand over its nuclear to Russia.

[@SieiraFiftyOne]

Fact is, surface ships are obsolete & have been for decades, but especially so now. Carriers are just police cars, you can park 'em next to third world countries you want to hassel. But even that's changing now, when any country can get effective missiles to defend themselves with.

[@jameskeener7251]

It is difficult for me to imagine a target as big as a CVN staying afloat in a major battle. But they are magnificent vessels.

[@Achromania]

They're harder to take out than many believe. We threw everything we had at the USS America (CV-66) over three days and couldn't sink her. They ended up having to use Marines to plant charges to finally do so. And these attacks didn't even have to contend with the strike group's air defense and CAPs. Not to mention Carriers are among the fastest ships in the fleet.

[@jameskeener7251]

@@Achromania Thank you for the response. I'm glad to read it. Is there an official loss estimate by type of conflict you're aware of?

[@Achromania]

​@@jameskeener7251 Estimates? AKA.. guesses? People make all types of guesses all the time, how much they bare resemblance to what actually transpires is the question. "Experts" made all kinds of "estimates" about Russia's combat capability, the effectiveness of their equipments (S300/400 especially), and those estimates turned out to be absolutely worthless. I could site dozens of examples. The point is, in real world conditions, with big boy munitions, these ships proved incredibly difficult to sink, and that's if you can even hit one to begin with. They're not these "sitting ducks" many, including you apparently, would have people believe.

[@jameskeener7251]

@@Achromania Nevermind.

[@jameskeener7251]

"We threw everything we had at the USS America..." The we you cite is the US Navy? Some group of which you're a member? The United States government? Who did the throwing? Should I accept your analysis or the analyses of the experts you deride? Or is expertise in general something to be shunned, ridiculed, and distrusted? Less reliable than some guy on KZbin?

[@tonysmith5052]

America needs a Star wars system!!!!

[@Mustapha1963]

It's an amazing product of technology. But it might also be obsolete very soon, if it isn't already. Does it have a viable defense against hypersonic missiles? Maybe it does- I don't expect the government to say one way or another. But if it doesn't......well, tens of billions of dollars worth of ship could be easily destroyed by several million dollars' worth of missile(s). I think our enemies would make that trade every single day.

[@blairg378]

Typical the pic to attract has nothing to do with the video!!!

[@mchrome3366]

Narrator’s voice sounds like fingernails across a blackboard as he takes too much time telling us what we already know. Sorry hard to listen to.

[@DKLGalactus5]

After what Israel has done, I don't think most Americans want anything to do with it.

[@shrikantbadve8057]

A huge aircraft carrier may face attack from below the water surface at a lightening speed from several underwater drones or torpedoes from 360 degrees, Chinese style (just like Taiwan was threatened from all directions). It will be an under water war to sink the carrier or at least damage it seriously or immobilized surrounded by only salty water...

[@davetomlinson9063]

If someone manages to sink or put out of commission a us carrier which would be very unlikely it may cause a rethink of navy doctrine. A vulnerable 15 billion dollar target is unacceptable.

[@TheTheratfarmer]

The Enterprise? I said no oher ship shall be named Enterpise until we reach the speed of light. Who is Doris Miller?

[@tombombadil3185]

In modern warfare AC's are just bigger targets. They are hugely expensive to build and then maintain. They also require a task force which amounts to an entire fleet of ships. With hypersonic weapons they no longer serve any purpose other than 'aircraft carrier diplomacy' which amounts to intimidation.

[@Jack51971]

Super! Our social security is bankrupt?😉

[@ultimobile]

yay for winning WWII - but today's warfare seems to involve lots of cheap drones, and grey zone cutting subsea internet cables - how that's being planned for ?

[@mikesalt8248]

Though impressive to me, I can't help seeing the vulneribility in modern war ! Hope I am totally wrong. Funny Russia doesn't see the need for them Mmmm.🤔

[@simonlau1294]

Why always get ready for seeking wars

[@bootsbagby6551]

Like both updated battleships and aircraft carriers.

[@danwillis2671]

There are no active duty battleships. They are outdated and have been for more than 30 years.

[@danwillis2671]

The goal of these videos should be to give precise accurate information, not lengthy ramblings about unrelated information.

[@eugenefleming1614]

Syria doesn't exist any more

[@geodesy2009]

The Russian losses in Ukraine and the subsequent revelations about weaknesses in Russian military organization and systems have led to several ways in which the U.S. and NATO militaries have been strengthened: 1. **Increased Military Spending**: Many NATO countries have boosted their defense budgets in response to the perceived threat from Russia, ensuring better funding for modernization, research, and development of military capabilities. 2. **Enhanced Readiness and Preparedness**: The conflict has prompted NATO to enhance its rapid response forces and improve readiness levels among member states. This includes increased joint exercises and training focused on countering hybrid warfare tactics. 3. **Focus on Modernization**: Observations of Russian equipment and tactics have highlighted the need for modernization in NATO forces. This has led to investments in advanced technologies, such as drones, cyber capabilities, and missile defense systems. 4. **Strengthened Eastern Flank**: NATO has reinforced its eastern flank by deploying additional troops and equipment to member states in Eastern Europe. This bolsters deterrence against potential aggression from Russia and reassures Eastern European allies. 5. **Intelligence Sharing**: The conflict has accelerated intelligence sharing among NATO allies, improving situational awareness and strategic planning. This collaboration has been crucial for understanding threats and coordinating responses. 6. **Focus on Hybrid Warfare**: The lessons learned from the conflict, particularly regarding hybrid warfare tactics, have led NATO to develop strategies to counter unconventional threats, including cyber-attacks, disinformation campaigns, and the use of proxy forces. 7. **Strengthened Partnerships**: NATO has deepened cooperation with non-member countries that support its objectives, enhancing collective security through partnerships and joint exercises. This includes closer ties with Ukraine, Finland, and Sweden. 8. **Reevaluation of Military Doctrine**: The insights gained from the Ukraine conflict have prompted NATO to reassess military doctrines and strategies, ensuring they are better equipped to handle contemporary and future threats. Overall, the situation in Ukraine has served as a catalyst for NATO and U.S. military transformation, promoting a more unified, prepared, and technologically advanced defense posture.

[@donaldmessick6301]

The Japanese regret Ed bombing Pearl Harbor after the us binned back

[@tokasonumeanozie3096]

It's a shame that US wasted billions without a single war due to paranoid in the world 😊

[@thomasromanelli2561]

Meanwhile, the PLAN just floated a new LHD platform with two islands and EMALS to deploy when they take Taiwan, not to mention the three stealth aircraft that were seen in public for the first time last week. USA looking pretty slow, and our ship-building capabilities aren’t what they used to be… Time to step up…

[@S2minute]

I suppose broadcasting US military capabilities is a thing. If Trump wants to find people guilty of Treason, he may be able to find them here with the ones that create videos like this.

[@maxbgi70]

Where is the carrier??? US Navy is deteriorating.

[@BradleySaunders-y7i]

Tech treck exspanding balloon will pop soon.😂

[@WarMonger-sf8hd]

You sound like my rotc said sarge miihlbach

[@scf24]

Why waste and what a waste of money to spend all the labour and time and money creating these aircraft carriers when all world countries signed a declaration under NESARA and GESARA that there will be no activaction of wars between countries and there will be world peace for future humanity worldwide .. What a waste of money time and effort

[@Tracy-RhondaAdkins1962]

The military should come out with a ship called the USS Jimmy Carter!! He was a good president!!

[@bobmarshall3700]

Why do those who narrate these videos have such offensive loud mouths?

[@bruceskehan251]

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@saadmohiuddin7662]

Pity! One Oreshnik can destroy the 14billion dollar plus aircraft carrier in a millionth of a second!

[@Gman979]

Doesn't sound very convincing. Lack the usual American swag. 😂😂😂😂

[@michaelkirk9870]

Relevant for 75 years? This sounds like foolish thinking to me. Considering the development of advanced hypersonic missiles & drone swarms these “military floating islands” seem more like targets and the bloated battleships developed from 1890-1945 … costly, increasingly short sighted, and irrelevant. The AmeriKaan Empire should be focusing more on inexpensive means of attack. With China controlling rare earth supplies these costly systems may not be the best use of the funds “We” have. Just saying, “are We building outdated platforms for a future that is changing so rapidly as to make these weapons of war more like buggy whips? Sure, they’re good to look at and the Pentagon & the miltary industrial complex LOVE them … but are they really worth the dough when there seems to be constant short falls in the USN ability to even properly staff them?

[@toddbearden7251]

Hey, if you got it, flaunt it. I think all of the other navy’s around the world have not advanced too much - so yeah, the old ships are still relevant. China is lying about those rare earth materials - that’s my opinion. They are cooking the books

[@BradleySaunders-y7i]

Kewl😊

[@TaeliusClips]

The channel owner needs to use REAL photos and not these hokey thumbnails to draw viewers in.

[@LIVEWITHBREI]

👁️👁️👁️🙇🏽‍♀️💬big paupah:)

[@nivramsleumas7411]

One oreshnick salvo and 💥. Wasteful investment.

[@jaybee9269]

“Syrian Air Force”? The what now?