The One TRUE Ranking of All 58 Super Bowl CHAMPIONS

[@violabeaumont3758]

Joe Flacco made himself a fortune in that 2012 playoffs. The most profitable 4 game stretch ever for a QB lol

[@razkable]

To be fair he had success before that too...they didn't pay him based on 1 season

[@sStyleMo]

It also did give them a second ring, something over half the league doesn't have in a season where people counted them out

[@BleedingBlackBlood69]

Joe earned it. Only man to. Beat the patriots in New England…in the playoffs…TWICE. Ravens Patriots playoff games were my favorite

[@ColoradoSportsFan178]

I don't think you should question the 2015 Broncos No Fly Zone defense's legendary status. Yes, we were in 12 1-score games during the regular season, but that was mostly because our offense was not very good, even with Manning at Quarterback. Out of all the regular season games that year, I would say our defense straight up WON 8 of those games for us give or take. We were the #1 scoring defense for a reason, and the dominance from both the front 7 and the secondary is what put that unit in the history books. You can say what you want about the TEAM not being the best Super Bowl winning team of all time, and I would agree with you. What's on paper shows that. But, c'mon man. That defense was simply phenomenal.

[@thedemon9692]

91 redskins is the most over looked forgotten about team that was silently one of the greatest teams of all time

[@hiimemily]

Tom Brady has more rings than any franchise. He also lost to the two worst Super Bowl champs of all time. The duality of the GOAT...

[@monkeyfather27]

Full C Score Rankings 58. 2011 Giants 57. 2007 Giants 56. 1970 Colts 55. 2012 Ravens 54. 2023 Chiefs 53. 2001 Patriots 52. 1980 Raiders 51. 2021 Rams 50. 2018 Patriots 49. 1987 Redskins 48. 2015 Broncos 47. 2022 Chiefs 46. 2006 Colts 45. 1981 49ers 44. 1988 49ers 43. 1968 Jets 42. 2003 Patriots 41. 2005 Steelers 40. 1974 Steelers 39. 1990 Giants 38. 2020 Buccaneers 37. 2008 Steelers 36. 1982 Redskins 35. 2019 Chiefs 34. 1983 Raiders 33. 1967 Packers 32. 1976 Raiders 31. 1995 Cowboys 30. 2010 Packers 29. 2000 Ravens 28. 2017 Eagles 27. 2016 Patriots 26. 1997 Broncos 25. 1993 Cowboys 24. 1971 Cowboys 23. 2014 Patriots 22. 1972 Dolphins 21. 1978 Steelers 20. 2002 Buccaneers 19. 1999 Rams 18. 1998 Broncos 17. 1977 Cowboys 16. 2009 Saints 15. 1969 Chiefs 14. 1979 Steelers 13. 2004 Patriots 12. 1986 Giants 11. 1992 Cowboys 10. 2013 Seahawks 9. 1994 49ers 8. 1975 Steelers 7. 1966 Packers 6. 1984 49ers 5. 1973 Dolphins 4. 1989 49ers 3. 1996 Packers 2. 1991 Redskins 1. 1985 Bears

[@scottjones9973]

It might be fun to rank the best of the runners-up in these games. I'd be interested in how the "worst" winners match up with the "best" losers.

[@tmap92]

That is a great Idea!!! And I'm a bit bias---I kinda wonder how all three Bengal SB appearances would be ranked

[@chicagodude8888]

2001 rams, 07 Pats, 1990 bills, 69 Vikings and 68 colts all come to mind.

[@NickSweetChuck]

This is fantastic! I know you put a lot of effort into this. Thank you so much for taking the time to make this! Could you do one for nba or mlb championships?$

[@cccproductions2019]

Thank you! Certainly a possibility for the future.

[@tobiasreiper1653]

This was a cool video. I think by the metrics the Chiefs of 3023 has the hardest run to get to the Super Bowl. I am not sure where they factored in. Loved the video. Subbed.

[@Fireyninjadog]

The 96 packers are #1. When you're the best in offense and defense, with 3 hall of famers, you are the greatest Super Bowl champion team

[@BleedingBlackBlood69]

Favre with 2 passing TDs and a Rushing TD in the first half alone!

[@survivorrankings]

I love this ranking, thank you!

[@seandpizzle]

Also, since you like numbers, the 2015 Broncos D was #1 pass defense, #1 in sacks, #3 against the run, #4 scoring defense, #1 in yatds allowed...

[@truthtransistorradio6716]

I am a Cowboys fan, but one of my earliest sports memories was the 85 Bears beating my Cowboys like 42-0! I kept an eye on the Bears scores every week after that, and saw the destroy most team they faced accept the Dolphins. Absolutely, a dominant team. Especially, that defense!

[@tomw3886]

Marino had that quick release where he was able to beat the 46 blitz

[@truthtransistorradio6716]

@@tomw3886 I think most quarterbacks today would beat the 46 defense as well.

[@tomw3886]

@truthtransistorradio6716 probobly. But that was the reason Marino was able to beat them. It was because of his quick reads and quicker release. It doesn't matter how many guys you blitz when the ball was getting out with in 2-3 seconds

[@truthtransistorradio6716]

@tomw3886 The Dolphins also played the spread offense which forced the Bears to have more players in coverage. If they have 4 wide receivers, the Bears either have to cover them with Linebackers, or put more secondary on the field. I think everyone else thought they have to have an extra tight end and full back to block more. But that played right into the Bear's hands.

[@nathanjohnson2382]

Great video, one thing I’m big on is if a team repeats I will always put that team higher. Repeating is unrare and way more impressive. So I’m much more forgiving when it comes to stats.

[@sStyleMo]

Entertaining video, ranking all the champs is no easy task. I will say using yards gained and allowed instead of/in addition to points would've been a useful stat. For example, you knock the 2015 Broncos for only having the 4th best d in points, but they had the #1 defense in yards allowed. Points allowed doesn't account for offensive turnovers, manning threw some awful ints in some of those games that made their defenses's job hell and their stats look worse for points. Points per drive is also a good stat for measuring offenses/defenses.

[@d0nKsTaH]

29:30 you mention only two occasions a defense shut out the opponent. I think its three times. Mia 14, Washington 7 (Redskins got a blocked FG return for a td) Pit 16, Vikings 6 (Min got a Blocked punt for a td) Bal 34, Giants 7 (NY returned a kick off for a TD)

[@cccproductions2019]

You are absolutely right. Thanks for pointing that out, dunno how I missed it. I've made a note in the description.

[@johnburns9634]

Great Video. Well done! Lots of research!

[@WillMuny]

Fun Fact 1 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers rank #1 in Points Scored per Super Bowl, and #2 in Points Allowed per Super Bowl. If you take away the teams that have only went to one Super Bowl, they rank #1 in both categories. Fun Fact 2 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are the ONLY NFL Franchise to never give up an Extra Point or Two Point Conversion in Super Bowl History (Raiders had 1 FG, 3 TDs for 21 points, Chiefs had 3 FGs for 9 points). Fun Fact 3 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are the ONLY NFL Franchise to score 3 Defensive TDs in a Super Bowl, Dallas had the record with 2. Fun Fact 4 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are the ONLY NFL Franchise to have 3 Pick 6's in a game twice. First time was in their first win vs the Saints in 1977, and then again in their first Super Bowl win vs the Raiders

[@TheBeggies95]

My franchise!

[@Steve_Hunts96]

Pretty wild for a franchise shrouded in mediocrity for the majority of their existence!

[@scottfarmer8758]

Another fun fact. It took the Buccaneers 27 games to get their first win, it took 27 years to get their first Super Bowl win. Also they won their first Super Bowl by 27 points.

[@bucsredsoxredwings]

Bucs also rank 1st and 2nd (SB 37 and 55) in defense points added above average.Bucs D has also scored more TD that it has allowed (one TD for the Raiders was a blocked punt returned). And as a Bucs fan, the Joey Porter catch was not a catch

[@XBC3-4GOTY]

Love Seeing the Legendary 1996 Packers in the Top 5 at Number 3

[@jackdaniel2457]

Lucky not to play the Cowboys or Broncos tbh

[@slimypickle19]

​@jackdaniel2457 They got smacked in Dallas that year, who by the way, were not anywhere near their 1992 selves. Yet somehow, they ranked #11.......

[@sStyleMo]

@@slimypickle19 dallas totally had their number back then, they won every game in those early/mid 90's years, literally all of them

[@jamiemaloney1552]

I miss those NFC teams form the 80s. You knew the games would be fierce

[@rf5390]

As a REDSKINS Fan, I knew that 91 team was gonna be so close to the top. That was one classy, professional butt kicking football team.

[@kevingaeta3654]

Taylor was not the SB MVP in SB XXI. Phil Sims famously proclaimed that he was going to Disney.

[@tylerlarsen1842]

33:18 I completely agree with you on this 56:51 And this is where raw numbers should be taken with a HUGE grain of salt

[@randypeters366]

I was expecting it to be Chiefs fans that are butt-hurt over this. But surprisingly, it's a Niner/Montana fan, and not surprisingly, a fan of the overrated 72 Fins.

[@Dukes-pl8fo]

Honestly, I’m still surprised we won this year. I was telling everyone before every playoff game that “I really don’t expect us to win this game and that’s fine.”

[@IamSaralinka]

Eh, I’ll take the low C scores. We’re winning superbowls after years of torment and heartbreak. That’s all I care about lmao.

[@LeighMet]

1990 Giants should be higher Super Bowl XXI wasn't the last time a defensive guy got the mvp.

[@PierreBlain-tr3hg]

Er...Phil Simms was the Super Bowl MVP for Super Bowl 21...not Lawrence Taylor.

[@monkeyfather27]

He said Lawrence Taylor was the last Defensive (REGULAR SEASON) MVP

[@paulmicheldenverco1]

The oddsmakers had a serious anti-AFL bias. The phins in the yards and points categories led on both sides of the ball. Another thing about this team's two season dynasty is that one can say this ended the AFL-NFL rivalry at four games each [NYJ, KC, Mia-1, Mia-2, GB 1, GB2, Bal, Dal]. Miami was a plug and play team for Don Shula and the Steelers were mostly built going forward from 1970 [Joe Green, LC Greenwood, Jon Kolb and Andy Russell being big exceptions. The Steelers can be credited with drafting Jim Kelly, except this one was the wrong one being the wrong one.

[@seandpizzle]

The No Fly Zone was legendary because they won games. They might not have been the greatest points allowed wise, but they always got an interception or strip right when they looked screwed. One of the most exciting teams to watch in history

[@pdstor]

Interestingly enough, the top team - '85 Bears - was the second, and final, 15+ win team to win it all. Four- FOUR- 15-1 teams would come after them, only one of whom would make the Super Bowl at all (the '15 Panthers). The other in this count is the '07 Pats, and yeah. Speaking of upsets, the '10 Pats may have topped everyone on the list as Super Bowl winners had they NOT DROPPED TO THE JETS IN THE DIVISIONAL in a game only close by the final score, at a field where they had defeated them 45-3 weeks prior. It's worse of an upset than the one a year later when the '11 Giants pulled off a divisional shock against the 15-1 Packers.

[@candlestick1231]

The 1984 49ers are #1, they lost one game by only 3 points and they beat Dan Marino. The 1985 Bears lost one game too and they lost it to Dan Marino.

[@cccproductions2019]

I wasn't aware of a football team named "Dan Marino." I must not know football anywhere near as well as I thought I did. In all seriousness though, I'm a 49er fan, have been since 1983. I woulda loved if either the 84 or 89 team came in first. The numbers spit out the Bears though.

[@kylegross1081]

I think the 2010 Packers should be higher. There’s something to be said about never trailing by more than 7 points in any regular or postseason game

[@paulmicheldenverco1]

Denver had no solution for Randy White and Harvey Martin. Dallas drafted White with the pick that came from the Giants for Craig Morton, who deserved more than being a 2X SB losing QB. The irony wld be bitting if it weren't head aching and soul crushing.

[@dalehaskiell7975]

Steelers teams of the '70s 11. Hall of famers. I don't think there was any better and I'm not a Steeler fan

[@HaroldMccoy-vv4lt]

Agreed ,still only franchise to repeat twice as SB champions 74,75,78,79 ,44 yrs later and still hasn't been equaled or surpassed . 4 SB championships in 6 yrs , was another record during SB era , 49ers legendary Hof ,championship head coach Bill Walsh stated ,the 70's SB winning steelers teams had the greatest collection of talent in NFL history .

[@thefirstechlon5522]

How do so many people a) not understand the rating system is based on objective metrics and b) not understand that this isn’t saying these teams would beat one that has a lower c score. Its more a testament to the team relative to its own season than anything

[@welshpete]

what metrics place a PERFECT team so low? Just strength of schedule?

[@thefirstechlon5522]

@@welshpete sos, quality of wins, playoff performance (i assume). The video desc has the metrics

[@jimmythedudeman]

What is the algorithm for your C Score?

[@razkable]

The 07 giants being that low is wild when they had the 07 cowboys and eagles in their division...that was a good team in a tough spot...

[@hihunter7]

C scores man, all we can do is read em and weep

[@Saints-ji3vj]

The list is based on stats. Don't take offense.

[@scottfarmer8758]

You mentioned that there were two times that a Super Bowl ended in the same score, but there was actually three. Both Super Bowl X and XLVI ended in a 21-17 score.

[@XBC3-4GOTY]

The Patriots always with an Weak Ass schedule

[@tromboneman4517]

Not always. Those early 2000’s Patriots squads went through some STIFF competition to win their rings. And I don’t like them. But you can’t knock those early 2000’s teams.

[@jackdaniel2457]

Cry

[@markjones321]

@@tromboneman4517facts besides that weak ass division which is only 6 games they still had to play a loaded afc every year in the playoffs

[@Saints-ji3vj]

Lol yeah but a big reason for that is the division they played in. Granted due to them usually being the best team they usually faced the heavy hitters in the AFC (Ravens, Colts, Steelers, Broncos, Chiefs) so it kinda balances out when you think about it.

[@fortunehunter2224]

How can you not talk the 2020 bucs but blabber about a season that only had 9 games smh

[@slimypickle19]

These "c score" rankings are hilarious. The fact that the 1996 Packers are above ALL of the 90s Cowboys is a joke, considering the 1996 Cowboys (a FAR weaker version of their glory days) beat them that season.

[@justinturley7071]

All on field goals no less. And did the same thing against the Runner up Patriots.

[@user-dg9qf7me8y]

So just to be clear, you think that the 96 packers shouldn't be higher than the 90's cowboys despite a harder schedule and better point differential because they lost to a different worse cowboys team? That's the textbook definition of cherry picking, and also illogical because it implies the '96 cowboys or any football team for that matter are strictly "better" than any team they happen to beat on any given Sunday.

[@slimypickle19]

@user-dg9qf7me8y There's nothing illogical about it, bud. 1996 was a down year for Dallas, & they beat the Packers. 1992 was PEAK Dallas, & they're only #11. It's not that hard to figure out.

[@user-dg9qf7me8y]

@@slimypickle19 Notice how you didn’t address any of my arguments? Yeah, you’re welcome to try that again if you want to have a conversation. Otherwise don’t bother.

[@slimypickle19]

@user-dg9qf7me8y What arguements? Pt differential & strength of schedule as olit pertains from 1996 to 1992 are 4 years apart, theres no common variable. And the only "opinion" i stated thay wasnt factual was the fact that i believe the 92 Cowboys were a far superior team than the 96 Cowboys. So by that logic, if 96 Dallas was able to beat the mighty 96 Packers being held to only field goals, then in what world do the 96 packers beat the 92 Cowboys? You have a lot to learn before you start acting tough on the internet.

[@jeffreystaton4306]

Which one of those NFL teams that you got ranked above? The 1972 Dolphins would have had the same record if they would've lost a starting quarterback for most of the season.

[@razkable]

No one should be surprised by the legion of boom...looking back that was a great defense

[@Samsungor]

How hard can your schedule be when you litterally won the superbowl?

[@rtchidc]

Difficulty of opponents on a team's regular season schedule is independent of the quality of the team playing that schedule.

[@geoffreyrue8026]

43:03 That's actually Nick Collins who had that pick 6 for the Packers.

[@floridagatorsfootballfan2024]

Can you do varisty sliders

[@MrSeahawk113]

Superbowl 48 Happiest Day of my life Superbowl 49 Saddest Day of my life

[@MrSeahawk113]

I've seen 15 out of the first 58 Superbowls Starting With Superbowl 43

[@monkeyfather27]

I'm a Broncos fan good thing I wasn't alive in the 80s and early 90s

[@razkable]

The chiefs had the toughest playoff stretch maybe ever the past 2 years combined...what are you talking about

[@monkeyfather27]

No the recency bias is insane

[@lucaskincanyon7393]

@@monkeyfather27agreed recency bias is crazy.

[@scottfarmer8758]

Johnny Unitas was not benched in Super Bowl V he was injured

[@littleblackduck3134]

As a Raider fan for 50 ÷ years, I'm disappointed to see you ranked the '83 champions lower than the '76, ( who i do feel were overrated) champions

[@razkable]

Some great title teams do need to be seperated cause if they played the weaker ones one would 100% win like anyone who thinks the 1989 49ers and 2011 giants are similar clearly don't know the game...

[@THEREDHOTWRECK]

Nick Collins picked off that pass in Super Bowl XLV not Nick Barnett

[@someperson3883]

Where would the 2018 Saints rank on this list?

[@rtchidc]

Ineligible. The 2018 Saints didn't win the Super Bowl.

[@someperson3883]

@@rtchidc If it wasn’t for the refs they would’ve. That’s why I want to know dummy

[@cccproductions2019]

Hard to say, because their C-score would have increased had they made the Super Bowl and won it. Their final score was very good at 24.155 which woulda had em right behind the 2005 Steelers at 42nd, but not as good as it woulda been otherwise.

[@someperson3883]

@@cccproductions2019 How much of an increase to C-Score is winning the Super Bowl

[@kevincrittenden7567]

I like ur videos, but you've got to really double check facts and dates. You said the 2017 giants beat the patriots. Quality control

[@razkable]

The 2011 giants would smack around the 1968 jets...sorry...but they destroyed the packers defense and their d killed the falcons and kept brady to 17....

[@christiansoldier77]

The Panthers are the worst team of the 2020s

[@razkable]

I am not even a fan of the modern game but average teams now a days like the lions would smoke the 1968 jets or 1967 packers or 1970 colts

[@Krispybuttz]

The lions aren't an average team now

[@deirdre108]

The Lions are going to the superbowl bro, and I’m a Seahawks fan.

[@Iamhungey]

@@deirdre108 If their opponent are the Ravens, expect Tucker's 69 yarder to screw them over in the final second.

[@deirdre108]

@@Iamhungey Oh yeah, I can see that happening!

[@Iamhungey]

@@deirdre108 Even moreso if the ball starts to die down only to do the triple doink and still flips in for the game winning field goal. Even UT can't script this one better than that. Had the site of the next SB not be the super dome, the sudden gust of wind would push the ball further.

[@razkable]

Giants won 2nd title in 5 seasons not 4 in 2012...2007 and 2012 are 5 years apart...

[@christopherkaas6470]

No, it was in 2007 and 2011 or The play-offs was in 2008 and 2012

[@jimmythedudeman]

Larry Allen was the MVP of Super Bowl 30

[@bigpasty1582]

Larry Brown

[@bradylange7619]

Nick Collins, not Nick Barnett

[@d0nKsTaH]

Everyone knows the "By God" New York Jets are the best Super Bowl team...... They even guaranteed the win

[@welshpete]

Just a clue. If your own customer made scoring system brings the ONLY perfect team in at 22nd, your system is wrong. Also 1st in Scoring on both offence and defence. In 5 out of 7 catagories, they cannot be beaten (record, 1-score record, 2+ score record, PF, PA) so SOS and playoff performance drop them that far? Stopped watching, sorry - but this it utter junk. Any semblance of realism is gone. Come back when you've grown a brain. That 72 team could have played every team twice and never lost.

[@houstoneuler]

If you rank the Super Bowl losers, would the #1 be the Colts who lost to the Jets, or one of the greatest shows on turf Rams?

[@cccproductions2019]

Stay tuned. This list is forthcoming...

[@rtchidc]

2007 Patriots.

[@TheBeggies95]

07 Patriots

[@Saints-ji3vj]

Definitely the 07' Patriots

[@razkable]

The 85 bears are not better than the 84 49ers....we saw that in playoffs...how are the 89 and 84 49ers not top 3 to 4 each lol...and how are the packers top 3 and the first packers super bowl team so high...come on with the 91 redskins...look at the qb....terrible

[@rf5390]

Wow dude I was already thinking ur delusional and then you said even more delusional stuff.

[@Saints-ji3vj]

Do you understand that this list was based on stats? Not on who you feel is a better team.

[@rtchidc]

When did the 1985 Bears play the 1984 49ers in the playoffs? Was it recorded? Was time travel involved?

[@frankchukwumah6302]

The 92 cowboys lost to the rams. How can they be number 11. And they didn't have home field advantage.

[@warderjack]

So many times the SB winner is ranked #1 for points allowed. When in doubt, defense wins championships.

[@matthewjosephthecommonsens2940]

2011 pats win are they number 58? No. So the Giants shouldn't be either, there are def worse sb teams than the '11 g men

[@jab1289]

You have five teams from the 1984-96 Super Bowl Myth era over any of the 70's Steelers? The Steelers were loaded with HOFers, and these teams that won in the 84-96 era are vastly overrated. They are good teams that beat average to below-average AFC trash. Elway could go back in time with the team that he led to two SB's, and the 97 and 98 Broncos would beat the teams that beat them in the 80's (when Elway was the whole team). I do agree, though, with the bottom of the list. The 11 Giants ARE the worst SB champ ever. They were a Romo missed connection to Miles Austin (in Week 14) away from probably not even making the playoffs. I also agree with the 80 Raiders (who were ultra-lucky in the playoffs) and 01 Pats being in the bottom-10 (the 03 Pats should be in the bottom ten as well. They weren't much better, and they were even luckier).

[@bryanjones4444]

He bases a lot of this on point differential which is unfair to the 70's teams as points were harder to come by in that era. Also one other flaw is that he does not seem to respect clutch play. Winning close games is also an important quality for any team just as scoring a lot of points and not giving up many is.

[@rtchidc]

@@bryanjones4444 Point differential consideration would only be unfair if play of teams across multiple seasons factored into the C-score of a team from a given season. I don't think that's the case. "Clutch wins" is I think overrated, insofar as there's any suggestion that decisive wins aren't more desired by teams, and aren't more indicative of higher quality of teams. I think Steve Young was once asked why he didn't have a high number of clutch wins or "come from behind" wins when he quarterbacked for the 49ers, and his response was that it was because they were usually winning by blowout.

[@THEREDHOTWRECK]

The bottom 20 features 4 of Bradys 7 rings. Tells you all you need to know....

[@trevertravis8963]

And two of his losses.

[@greninja4175]

Braindead

[@jackdaniel2457]

That his teams were among the worst Super Bowl winning sides, which only goes to show how important he was to their teams? I don’t think that’s the argument you want to make.

[@THEREDHOTWRECK]

@jackdaniel2457 lol that's not true at all. It just further proves how the NFL fixed games that he won

[@DenverIn4]

Joe Namath is the most overrated player in the history of the entire league

[@razkable]

For me it is dan marino...

[@TheBeggies95]

This guy Brady’s hate bias made this painful to watch with his snarky comments

[@cccproductions2019]

Snarky is a compliment. Thank you, kindly. No hate though, just honest evaluation. I'm a 49ers fan and I look at Joe Montana the exact same way.

[@jackdaniel2457]

@cccproductions2019 who do you think is the goat QB (excluding Mahomes whose career isn't anywhere near finished yet)

[@hillarymuller6646]

Pls nfl inpiralsam

[@plantfeeder6677]

Would put the '81 and '88 49er teams against any of the next 20 higher ranked teams. Especially any NE or Pittsburg team jokingly ranked above them. Games aren't won on paper and one thing you aren't taking into consideration, Joe Montana didn't loose Super Bowls and neither did Bill Walsh.

[@randypeters366]

Didn't "loose" Super Bowls?

[@bryanjones4444]

They were 4-0 in Super Bowls but they had the league's best team 2 or 3 other times without making it to the Super Bowl.

[@benbaer4697]

72 Dolphins are number one.

[@WillMuny]

Most overrated Team EVER!! Here are the stats. Lets go over the utter weakness of the schedule. At 8-6 Chiefs Vs 1-13 Oilers At 7-7 Vikings At 7-7 Jets Vs 4-9-1 Chargers Vs 4-9-1 Bills At 5-8 Colts At 4-9-1 Bills Vs 3-11 Patriots Vs 7-7 Jets Vs 4-9-1 Cardials At 3-11 Patriots At 8-6 Giants Vs 5-8 Colts NONE of these team made the playoffs, NOT ONE!!! 2 Winning Teams, NO team with 9 wins. Excluding the Dolphins, 6 other teams won 10 games or more. They played 8 games vs the worst 5 AFC teams. Now lets look at their playoff run, who they beat and how bad they beat them Vs 10-4 Browns - 20-14 Vs 11-3 Steelers - 21-17 Vs 11-3 Redskins - 14-7 If the other team gets 1 TD, the Dolphins record is 0-2-1 Now lets compare this playoff run to the 1983 Raiders run in the playoffs. Vs 10-6 Steelers - 38-10 Vs 9-7 Seahawks - 30-14 Vs 14-2 Redskins - 38-9

[@benbaer4697]

@@WillMuny I miss the day when you people had stance.

[@XBC3-4GOTY]

@@WillMunyI didn’t know the 72 dolphins 🐬 had the easiest schedule for a SuperBowl Champion of All Time

[@bryanjones4444]

@@XBC3-4GOTY Possibly the easiest schedule of any team all time. They faced a schedule with a .37 something winning percentage.

[@bryanjones4444]

@@WillMuny The AFC was incredibly weak those first 3 years after the merger. AFL teams as a whole were on a totally different level than the NFL teams. In 1970 one of the worst Colt teams of the late 50's and 60's won the Super Bowl. They essentially got a bye into the big game and then won a close one over Dallas.

[@THEREDHOTWRECK]

66 Packers lost both games in the regular season by a COMBINED 4 points.

[@millabasset1710]

2013 Seahawks over 2004 Patriots? What? Rodney Harrison being flexing all over Legion of Boom

[@AlexSmith-tp8fz]

Fuck the statistics, 2002 Bucs were the best Super Bowl team of all time

[@TheLegendarFiftyTwo]

This was embarrassing and... like why did you make this this? Lmao

[@MrSeahawk113]

Carolina should have won Superbowl 50

[@trevertravis8963]

Maybe if Cam would have dove for the ball.

[@razkable]

No they were shut down like the broncos raiders giants pats before them in previous super bowls against all time defenses...