Joe Flacco made himself a fortune in that 2012 playoffs. The most profitable 4 game stretch ever for a QB lol
@razkable15 күн бұрын
To be fair he had success before that too...they didn't pay him based on 1 season
@sStyleMo12 күн бұрын
It also did give them a second ring, something over half the league doesn't have in a season where people counted them out
@BleedingBlackBlood697 күн бұрын
Joe earned it. Only man to. Beat the patriots in New England…in the playoffs…TWICE. Ravens Patriots playoff games were my favorite
@ColoradoSportsFan17812 күн бұрын
I don't think you should question the 2015 Broncos No Fly Zone defense's legendary status. Yes, we were in 12 1-score games during the regular season, but that was mostly because our offense was not very good, even with Manning at Quarterback. Out of all the regular season games that year, I would say our defense straight up WON 8 of those games for us give or take. We were the #1 scoring defense for a reason, and the dominance from both the front 7 and the secondary is what put that unit in the history books. You can say what you want about the TEAM not being the best Super Bowl winning team of all time, and I would agree with you. What's on paper shows that. But, c'mon man. That defense was simply phenomenal.
@thedemon969213 күн бұрын
91 redskins is the most over looked forgotten about team that was silently one of the greatest teams of all time
@hiimemily7 күн бұрын
Tom Brady has more rings than any franchise. He also lost to the two worst Super Bowl champs of all time. The duality of the GOAT...
It might be fun to rank the best of the runners-up in these games. I'd be interested in how the "worst" winners match up with the "best" losers.
@tmap9214 күн бұрын
That is a great Idea!!! And I'm a bit bias---I kinda wonder how all three Bengal SB appearances would be ranked
@chicagodude88886 күн бұрын
2001 rams, 07 Pats, 1990 bills, 69 Vikings and 68 colts all come to mind.
@NickSweetChuck5 ай бұрын
This is fantastic! I know you put a lot of effort into this. Thank you so much for taking the time to make this! Could you do one for nba or mlb championships?$
@cccproductions20195 ай бұрын
Thank you! Certainly a possibility for the future.
@tobiasreiper16539 күн бұрын
This was a cool video. I think by the metrics the Chiefs of 3023 has the hardest run to get to the Super Bowl. I am not sure where they factored in. Loved the video. Subbed.
@Fireyninjadog10 күн бұрын
The 96 packers are #1. When you're the best in offense and defense, with 3 hall of famers, you are the greatest Super Bowl champion team
@BleedingBlackBlood697 күн бұрын
Favre with 2 passing TDs and a Rushing TD in the first half alone!
@survivorrankings5 ай бұрын
I love this ranking, thank you!
@seandpizzle13 күн бұрын
Also, since you like numbers, the 2015 Broncos D was #1 pass defense, #1 in sacks, #3 against the run, #4 scoring defense, #1 in yatds allowed...
@truthtransistorradio671623 күн бұрын
I am a Cowboys fan, but one of my earliest sports memories was the 85 Bears beating my Cowboys like 42-0! I kept an eye on the Bears scores every week after that, and saw the destroy most team they faced accept the Dolphins. Absolutely, a dominant team. Especially, that defense!
@tomw388610 күн бұрын
Marino had that quick release where he was able to beat the 46 blitz
@truthtransistorradio671610 күн бұрын
@@tomw3886 I think most quarterbacks today would beat the 46 defense as well.
@tomw38869 күн бұрын
@truthtransistorradio6716 probobly. But that was the reason Marino was able to beat them. It was because of his quick reads and quicker release. It doesn't matter how many guys you blitz when the ball was getting out with in 2-3 seconds
@truthtransistorradio67169 күн бұрын
@tomw3886 The Dolphins also played the spread offense which forced the Bears to have more players in coverage. If they have 4 wide receivers, the Bears either have to cover them with Linebackers, or put more secondary on the field. I think everyone else thought they have to have an extra tight end and full back to block more. But that played right into the Bear's hands.
@nathanjohnson23825 ай бұрын
Great video, one thing I’m big on is if a team repeats I will always put that team higher. Repeating is unrare and way more impressive. So I’m much more forgiving when it comes to stats.
@sStyleMo12 күн бұрын
Entertaining video, ranking all the champs is no easy task. I will say using yards gained and allowed instead of/in addition to points would've been a useful stat. For example, you knock the 2015 Broncos for only having the 4th best d in points, but they had the #1 defense in yards allowed. Points allowed doesn't account for offensive turnovers, manning threw some awful ints in some of those games that made their defenses's job hell and their stats look worse for points. Points per drive is also a good stat for measuring offenses/defenses.
@d0nKsTaH5 ай бұрын
29:30 you mention only two occasions a defense shut out the opponent. I think its three times. Mia 14, Washington 7 (Redskins got a blocked FG return for a td) Pit 16, Vikings 6 (Min got a Blocked punt for a td) Bal 34, Giants 7 (NY returned a kick off for a TD)
@cccproductions20195 ай бұрын
You are absolutely right. Thanks for pointing that out, dunno how I missed it. I've made a note in the description.
@johnburns963421 күн бұрын
Great Video. Well done! Lots of research!
@WillMuny4 ай бұрын
Fun Fact 1 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers rank #1 in Points Scored per Super Bowl, and #2 in Points Allowed per Super Bowl. If you take away the teams that have only went to one Super Bowl, they rank #1 in both categories. Fun Fact 2 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are the ONLY NFL Franchise to never give up an Extra Point or Two Point Conversion in Super Bowl History (Raiders had 1 FG, 3 TDs for 21 points, Chiefs had 3 FGs for 9 points). Fun Fact 3 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are the ONLY NFL Franchise to score 3 Defensive TDs in a Super Bowl, Dallas had the record with 2. Fun Fact 4 - The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are the ONLY NFL Franchise to have 3 Pick 6's in a game twice. First time was in their first win vs the Saints in 1977, and then again in their first Super Bowl win vs the Raiders
@TheBeggies9523 күн бұрын
My franchise!
@Steve_Hunts9618 күн бұрын
Pretty wild for a franchise shrouded in mediocrity for the majority of their existence!
@scottfarmer875818 күн бұрын
Another fun fact. It took the Buccaneers 27 games to get their first win, it took 27 years to get their first Super Bowl win. Also they won their first Super Bowl by 27 points.
@bucsredsoxredwings11 күн бұрын
Bucs also rank 1st and 2nd (SB 37 and 55) in defense points added above average.Bucs D has also scored more TD that it has allowed (one TD for the Raiders was a blocked punt returned). And as a Bucs fan, the Joey Porter catch was not a catch
@XBC3-4GOTY2 ай бұрын
Love Seeing the Legendary 1996 Packers in the Top 5 at Number 3
@jackdaniel245714 күн бұрын
Lucky not to play the Cowboys or Broncos tbh
@slimypickle1913 күн бұрын
@jackdaniel2457 They got smacked in Dallas that year, who by the way, were not anywhere near their 1992 selves. Yet somehow, they ranked #11.......
@sStyleMo12 күн бұрын
@@slimypickle19 dallas totally had their number back then, they won every game in those early/mid 90's years, literally all of them
@jamiemaloney155213 күн бұрын
I miss those NFC teams form the 80s. You knew the games would be fierce
@rf539011 күн бұрын
As a REDSKINS Fan, I knew that 91 team was gonna be so close to the top. That was one classy, professional butt kicking football team.
@kevingaeta365413 күн бұрын
Taylor was not the SB MVP in SB XXI. Phil Sims famously proclaimed that he was going to Disney.
@tylerlarsen184216 күн бұрын
33:18 I completely agree with you on this 56:51 And this is where raw numbers should be taken with a HUGE grain of salt
@randypeters3665 ай бұрын
I was expecting it to be Chiefs fans that are butt-hurt over this. But surprisingly, it's a Niner/Montana fan, and not surprisingly, a fan of the overrated 72 Fins.
@Dukes-pl8fo5 ай бұрын
Honestly, I’m still surprised we won this year. I was telling everyone before every playoff game that “I really don’t expect us to win this game and that’s fine.”
@IamSaralinka2 ай бұрын
Eh, I’ll take the low C scores. We’re winning superbowls after years of torment and heartbreak. That’s all I care about lmao.
@LeighMet13 күн бұрын
1990 Giants should be higher Super Bowl XXI wasn't the last time a defensive guy got the mvp.
@PierreBlain-tr3hg13 күн бұрын
Er...Phil Simms was the Super Bowl MVP for Super Bowl 21...not Lawrence Taylor.
@monkeyfather2713 күн бұрын
He said Lawrence Taylor was the last Defensive (REGULAR SEASON) MVP
@paulmicheldenverco113 күн бұрын
The oddsmakers had a serious anti-AFL bias. The phins in the yards and points categories led on both sides of the ball. Another thing about this team's two season dynasty is that one can say this ended the AFL-NFL rivalry at four games each [NYJ, KC, Mia-1, Mia-2, GB 1, GB2, Bal, Dal]. Miami was a plug and play team for Don Shula and the Steelers were mostly built going forward from 1970 [Joe Green, LC Greenwood, Jon Kolb and Andy Russell being big exceptions. The Steelers can be credited with drafting Jim Kelly, except this one was the wrong one being the wrong one.
@seandpizzle13 күн бұрын
The No Fly Zone was legendary because they won games. They might not have been the greatest points allowed wise, but they always got an interception or strip right when they looked screwed. One of the most exciting teams to watch in history
@pdstor12 күн бұрын
Interestingly enough, the top team - '85 Bears - was the second, and final, 15+ win team to win it all. Four- FOUR- 15-1 teams would come after them, only one of whom would make the Super Bowl at all (the '15 Panthers). The other in this count is the '07 Pats, and yeah. Speaking of upsets, the '10 Pats may have topped everyone on the list as Super Bowl winners had they NOT DROPPED TO THE JETS IN THE DIVISIONAL in a game only close by the final score, at a field where they had defeated them 45-3 weeks prior. It's worse of an upset than the one a year later when the '11 Giants pulled off a divisional shock against the 15-1 Packers.
@candlestick123112 күн бұрын
The 1984 49ers are #1, they lost one game by only 3 points and they beat Dan Marino. The 1985 Bears lost one game too and they lost it to Dan Marino.
@cccproductions201912 күн бұрын
I wasn't aware of a football team named "Dan Marino." I must not know football anywhere near as well as I thought I did. In all seriousness though, I'm a 49er fan, have been since 1983. I woulda loved if either the 84 or 89 team came in first. The numbers spit out the Bears though.
@kylegross108112 күн бұрын
I think the 2010 Packers should be higher. There’s something to be said about never trailing by more than 7 points in any regular or postseason game
@paulmicheldenverco113 күн бұрын
Denver had no solution for Randy White and Harvey Martin. Dallas drafted White with the pick that came from the Giants for Craig Morton, who deserved more than being a 2X SB losing QB. The irony wld be bitting if it weren't head aching and soul crushing.
@dalehaskiell79759 күн бұрын
Steelers teams of the '70s 11. Hall of famers. I don't think there was any better and I'm not a Steeler fan
@HaroldMccoy-vv4lt5 күн бұрын
Agreed ,still only franchise to repeat twice as SB champions 74,75,78,79 ,44 yrs later and still hasn't been equaled or surpassed . 4 SB championships in 6 yrs , was another record during SB era , 49ers legendary Hof ,championship head coach Bill Walsh stated ,the 70's SB winning steelers teams had the greatest collection of talent in NFL history .
@thefirstechlon552213 күн бұрын
How do so many people a) not understand the rating system is based on objective metrics and b) not understand that this isn’t saying these teams would beat one that has a lower c score. Its more a testament to the team relative to its own season than anything
@welshpete12 күн бұрын
what metrics place a PERFECT team so low? Just strength of schedule?
@thefirstechlon552212 күн бұрын
@@welshpete sos, quality of wins, playoff performance (i assume). The video desc has the metrics
@jimmythedudeman19 күн бұрын
What is the algorithm for your C Score?
@razkable15 күн бұрын
The 07 giants being that low is wild when they had the 07 cowboys and eagles in their division...that was a good team in a tough spot...
@hihunter714 күн бұрын
C scores man, all we can do is read em and weep
@Saints-ji3vj10 күн бұрын
The list is based on stats. Don't take offense.
@scottfarmer875818 күн бұрын
You mentioned that there were two times that a Super Bowl ended in the same score, but there was actually three. Both Super Bowl X and XLVI ended in a 21-17 score.
@XBC3-4GOTY2 ай бұрын
The Patriots always with an Weak Ass schedule
@tromboneman45172 ай бұрын
Not always. Those early 2000’s Patriots squads went through some STIFF competition to win their rings. And I don’t like them. But you can’t knock those early 2000’s teams.
@jackdaniel245714 күн бұрын
Cry
@markjones32113 күн бұрын
@@tromboneman4517facts besides that weak ass division which is only 6 games they still had to play a loaded afc every year in the playoffs
@Saints-ji3vj10 күн бұрын
Lol yeah but a big reason for that is the division they played in. Granted due to them usually being the best team they usually faced the heavy hitters in the AFC (Ravens, Colts, Steelers, Broncos, Chiefs) so it kinda balances out when you think about it.
@fortunehunter222416 күн бұрын
How can you not talk the 2020 bucs but blabber about a season that only had 9 games smh
@slimypickle1913 күн бұрын
These "c score" rankings are hilarious. The fact that the 1996 Packers are above ALL of the 90s Cowboys is a joke, considering the 1996 Cowboys (a FAR weaker version of their glory days) beat them that season.
@justinturley707111 күн бұрын
All on field goals no less. And did the same thing against the Runner up Patriots.
@user-dg9qf7me8y10 күн бұрын
So just to be clear, you think that the 96 packers shouldn't be higher than the 90's cowboys despite a harder schedule and better point differential because they lost to a different worse cowboys team? That's the textbook definition of cherry picking, and also illogical because it implies the '96 cowboys or any football team for that matter are strictly "better" than any team they happen to beat on any given Sunday.
@slimypickle1910 күн бұрын
@user-dg9qf7me8y There's nothing illogical about it, bud. 1996 was a down year for Dallas, & they beat the Packers. 1992 was PEAK Dallas, & they're only #11. It's not that hard to figure out.
@user-dg9qf7me8y10 күн бұрын
@@slimypickle19 Notice how you didn’t address any of my arguments? Yeah, you’re welcome to try that again if you want to have a conversation. Otherwise don’t bother.
@slimypickle1910 күн бұрын
@user-dg9qf7me8y What arguements? Pt differential & strength of schedule as olit pertains from 1996 to 1992 are 4 years apart, theres no common variable. And the only "opinion" i stated thay wasnt factual was the fact that i believe the 92 Cowboys were a far superior team than the 96 Cowboys. So by that logic, if 96 Dallas was able to beat the mighty 96 Packers being held to only field goals, then in what world do the 96 packers beat the 92 Cowboys? You have a lot to learn before you start acting tough on the internet.
@jeffreystaton430621 күн бұрын
Which one of those NFL teams that you got ranked above? The 1972 Dolphins would have had the same record if they would've lost a starting quarterback for most of the season.
@razkable15 күн бұрын
No one should be surprised by the legion of boom...looking back that was a great defense
@Samsungor16 күн бұрын
How hard can your schedule be when you litterally won the superbowl?
@rtchidc6 күн бұрын
Difficulty of opponents on a team's regular season schedule is independent of the quality of the team playing that schedule.
@geoffreyrue802615 күн бұрын
43:03 That's actually Nick Collins who had that pick 6 for the Packers.
@floridagatorsfootballfan20242 ай бұрын
Can you do varisty sliders
@MrSeahawk1132 ай бұрын
Superbowl 48 Happiest Day of my life Superbowl 49 Saddest Day of my life
@MrSeahawk1132 ай бұрын
I've seen 15 out of the first 58 Superbowls Starting With Superbowl 43
@monkeyfather2713 күн бұрын
I'm a Broncos fan good thing I wasn't alive in the 80s and early 90s
@razkable15 күн бұрын
The chiefs had the toughest playoff stretch maybe ever the past 2 years combined...what are you talking about
@monkeyfather2713 күн бұрын
No the recency bias is insane
@lucaskincanyon739312 күн бұрын
@@monkeyfather27agreed recency bias is crazy.
@scottfarmer875818 күн бұрын
Johnny Unitas was not benched in Super Bowl V he was injured
@littleblackduck313421 күн бұрын
As a Raider fan for 50 ÷ years, I'm disappointed to see you ranked the '83 champions lower than the '76, ( who i do feel were overrated) champions
@razkable15 күн бұрын
Some great title teams do need to be seperated cause if they played the weaker ones one would 100% win like anyone who thinks the 1989 49ers and 2011 giants are similar clearly don't know the game...
@THEREDHOTWRECKАй бұрын
Nick Collins picked off that pass in Super Bowl XLV not Nick Barnett
@someperson3883Ай бұрын
Where would the 2018 Saints rank on this list?
@rtchidcАй бұрын
Ineligible. The 2018 Saints didn't win the Super Bowl.
@someperson3883Ай бұрын
@@rtchidc If it wasn’t for the refs they would’ve. That’s why I want to know dummy
@cccproductions2019Ай бұрын
Hard to say, because their C-score would have increased had they made the Super Bowl and won it. Their final score was very good at 24.155 which woulda had em right behind the 2005 Steelers at 42nd, but not as good as it woulda been otherwise.
@someperson3883Ай бұрын
@@cccproductions2019 How much of an increase to C-Score is winning the Super Bowl
@kevincrittenden756723 күн бұрын
I like ur videos, but you've got to really double check facts and dates. You said the 2017 giants beat the patriots. Quality control
@razkable15 күн бұрын
The 2011 giants would smack around the 1968 jets...sorry...but they destroyed the packers defense and their d killed the falcons and kept brady to 17....
@christiansoldier7713 күн бұрын
The Panthers are the worst team of the 2020s
@razkable15 күн бұрын
I am not even a fan of the modern game but average teams now a days like the lions would smoke the 1968 jets or 1967 packers or 1970 colts
@Krispybuttz14 күн бұрын
The lions aren't an average team now
@deirdre10812 күн бұрын
The Lions are going to the superbowl bro, and I’m a Seahawks fan.
@Iamhungey11 күн бұрын
@@deirdre108 If their opponent are the Ravens, expect Tucker's 69 yarder to screw them over in the final second.
@deirdre10811 күн бұрын
@@Iamhungey Oh yeah, I can see that happening!
@Iamhungey11 күн бұрын
@@deirdre108 Even moreso if the ball starts to die down only to do the triple doink and still flips in for the game winning field goal. Even UT can't script this one better than that. Had the site of the next SB not be the super dome, the sudden gust of wind would push the ball further.
@razkable15 күн бұрын
Giants won 2nd title in 5 seasons not 4 in 2012...2007 and 2012 are 5 years apart...
@christopherkaas647013 күн бұрын
No, it was in 2007 and 2011 or The play-offs was in 2008 and 2012
@jimmythedudeman19 күн бұрын
Larry Allen was the MVP of Super Bowl 30
@bigpasty158215 күн бұрын
Larry Brown
@bradylange761914 күн бұрын
Nick Collins, not Nick Barnett
@d0nKsTaH5 ай бұрын
Everyone knows the "By God" New York Jets are the best Super Bowl team...... They even guaranteed the win
@welshpete12 күн бұрын
Just a clue. If your own customer made scoring system brings the ONLY perfect team in at 22nd, your system is wrong. Also 1st in Scoring on both offence and defence. In 5 out of 7 catagories, they cannot be beaten (record, 1-score record, 2+ score record, PF, PA) so SOS and playoff performance drop them that far? Stopped watching, sorry - but this it utter junk. Any semblance of realism is gone. Come back when you've grown a brain. That 72 team could have played every team twice and never lost.
@houstoneuler3 ай бұрын
If you rank the Super Bowl losers, would the #1 be the Colts who lost to the Jets, or one of the greatest shows on turf Rams?
@cccproductions20193 ай бұрын
Stay tuned. This list is forthcoming...
@rtchidcАй бұрын
2007 Patriots.
@TheBeggies9523 күн бұрын
07 Patriots
@Saints-ji3vj10 күн бұрын
Definitely the 07' Patriots
@razkable15 күн бұрын
The 85 bears are not better than the 84 49ers....we saw that in playoffs...how are the 89 and 84 49ers not top 3 to 4 each lol...and how are the packers top 3 and the first packers super bowl team so high...come on with the 91 redskins...look at the qb....terrible
@rf539011 күн бұрын
Wow dude I was already thinking ur delusional and then you said even more delusional stuff.
@Saints-ji3vj10 күн бұрын
Do you understand that this list was based on stats? Not on who you feel is a better team.
@rtchidc6 күн бұрын
When did the 1985 Bears play the 1984 49ers in the playoffs? Was it recorded? Was time travel involved?
@frankchukwumah63024 ай бұрын
The 92 cowboys lost to the rams. How can they be number 11. And they didn't have home field advantage.
@warderjack2 ай бұрын
So many times the SB winner is ranked #1 for points allowed. When in doubt, defense wins championships.
@matthewjosephthecommonsens294016 күн бұрын
2011 pats win are they number 58? No. So the Giants shouldn't be either, there are def worse sb teams than the '11 g men
@jab12894 ай бұрын
You have five teams from the 1984-96 Super Bowl Myth era over any of the 70's Steelers? The Steelers were loaded with HOFers, and these teams that won in the 84-96 era are vastly overrated. They are good teams that beat average to below-average AFC trash. Elway could go back in time with the team that he led to two SB's, and the 97 and 98 Broncos would beat the teams that beat them in the 80's (when Elway was the whole team). I do agree, though, with the bottom of the list. The 11 Giants ARE the worst SB champ ever. They were a Romo missed connection to Miles Austin (in Week 14) away from probably not even making the playoffs. I also agree with the 80 Raiders (who were ultra-lucky in the playoffs) and 01 Pats being in the bottom-10 (the 03 Pats should be in the bottom ten as well. They weren't much better, and they were even luckier).
@bryanjones444425 күн бұрын
He bases a lot of this on point differential which is unfair to the 70's teams as points were harder to come by in that era. Also one other flaw is that he does not seem to respect clutch play. Winning close games is also an important quality for any team just as scoring a lot of points and not giving up many is.
@rtchidc6 күн бұрын
@@bryanjones4444 Point differential consideration would only be unfair if play of teams across multiple seasons factored into the C-score of a team from a given season. I don't think that's the case. "Clutch wins" is I think overrated, insofar as there's any suggestion that decisive wins aren't more desired by teams, and aren't more indicative of higher quality of teams. I think Steve Young was once asked why he didn't have a high number of clutch wins or "come from behind" wins when he quarterbacked for the 49ers, and his response was that it was because they were usually winning by blowout.
@THEREDHOTWRECKАй бұрын
The bottom 20 features 4 of Bradys 7 rings. Tells you all you need to know....
@trevertravis896318 күн бұрын
And two of his losses.
@greninja417518 күн бұрын
Braindead
@jackdaniel245714 күн бұрын
That his teams were among the worst Super Bowl winning sides, which only goes to show how important he was to their teams? I don’t think that’s the argument you want to make.
@THEREDHOTWRECK14 күн бұрын
@jackdaniel2457 lol that's not true at all. It just further proves how the NFL fixed games that he won
@DenverIn415 күн бұрын
Joe Namath is the most overrated player in the history of the entire league
@razkable15 күн бұрын
For me it is dan marino...
@TheBeggies9523 күн бұрын
This guy Brady’s hate bias made this painful to watch with his snarky comments
@cccproductions201922 күн бұрын
Snarky is a compliment. Thank you, kindly. No hate though, just honest evaluation. I'm a 49ers fan and I look at Joe Montana the exact same way.
@jackdaniel245714 күн бұрын
@cccproductions2019 who do you think is the goat QB (excluding Mahomes whose career isn't anywhere near finished yet)
@hillarymuller66465 ай бұрын
Pls nfl inpiralsam
@plantfeeder66775 ай бұрын
Would put the '81 and '88 49er teams against any of the next 20 higher ranked teams. Especially any NE or Pittsburg team jokingly ranked above them. Games aren't won on paper and one thing you aren't taking into consideration, Joe Montana didn't loose Super Bowls and neither did Bill Walsh.
@randypeters3665 ай бұрын
Didn't "loose" Super Bowls?
@bryanjones444425 күн бұрын
They were 4-0 in Super Bowls but they had the league's best team 2 or 3 other times without making it to the Super Bowl.
@benbaer46975 ай бұрын
72 Dolphins are number one.
@WillMuny4 ай бұрын
Most overrated Team EVER!! Here are the stats. Lets go over the utter weakness of the schedule. At 8-6 Chiefs Vs 1-13 Oilers At 7-7 Vikings At 7-7 Jets Vs 4-9-1 Chargers Vs 4-9-1 Bills At 5-8 Colts At 4-9-1 Bills Vs 3-11 Patriots Vs 7-7 Jets Vs 4-9-1 Cardials At 3-11 Patriots At 8-6 Giants Vs 5-8 Colts NONE of these team made the playoffs, NOT ONE!!! 2 Winning Teams, NO team with 9 wins. Excluding the Dolphins, 6 other teams won 10 games or more. They played 8 games vs the worst 5 AFC teams. Now lets look at their playoff run, who they beat and how bad they beat them Vs 10-4 Browns - 20-14 Vs 11-3 Steelers - 21-17 Vs 11-3 Redskins - 14-7 If the other team gets 1 TD, the Dolphins record is 0-2-1 Now lets compare this playoff run to the 1983 Raiders run in the playoffs. Vs 10-6 Steelers - 38-10 Vs 9-7 Seahawks - 30-14 Vs 14-2 Redskins - 38-9
@benbaer46974 ай бұрын
@@WillMuny I miss the day when you people had stance.
@XBC3-4GOTY2 ай бұрын
@@WillMunyI didn’t know the 72 dolphins 🐬 had the easiest schedule for a SuperBowl Champion of All Time
@bryanjones444425 күн бұрын
@@XBC3-4GOTY Possibly the easiest schedule of any team all time. They faced a schedule with a .37 something winning percentage.
@bryanjones444425 күн бұрын
@@WillMuny The AFC was incredibly weak those first 3 years after the merger. AFL teams as a whole were on a totally different level than the NFL teams. In 1970 one of the worst Colt teams of the late 50's and 60's won the Super Bowl. They essentially got a bye into the big game and then won a close one over Dallas.
@THEREDHOTWRECKАй бұрын
66 Packers lost both games in the regular season by a COMBINED 4 points.
@millabasset1710Ай бұрын
2013 Seahawks over 2004 Patriots? What? Rodney Harrison being flexing all over Legion of Boom
@AlexSmith-tp8fz14 күн бұрын
Fuck the statistics, 2002 Bucs were the best Super Bowl team of all time
@TheLegendarFiftyTwo12 күн бұрын
This was embarrassing and... like why did you make this this? Lmao
@MrSeahawk1132 ай бұрын
Carolina should have won Superbowl 50
@trevertravis896318 күн бұрын
Maybe if Cam would have dove for the ball.
@razkable15 күн бұрын
No they were shut down like the broncos raiders giants pats before them in previous super bowls against all time defenses...