The Parasitic Mind & Evolutionary Psychology - the Mislaibeled Podcast (THE SAAD TRUTH_1789)

[@GadSaad]

My book The Saad Truth about Happiness: 8 Secrets for Leading the Good Life is available for order: www.amazon.com/Saad-Truth-about-Happiness-Secrets/dp/1684512603 _______________________________________ To subscribe to my exclusive content on Twitter, please visit my bio at twitter.com/GadSaad _______________________________________ If you appreciate my work and would like to support it: subscribestar.com/the-saad-truth patreon.com/GadSaad paypal.me/GadSaad You can also click on the "Heart Thanks" icon immediately below the clip. _______________________________________

[@Reziac]

Hey Prof, that's a great look today. Very elegant. Not being consequential :)

[@nonpopishchristians]

Here, Jesus said best & no word salad John 4:14 (KJV) But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life. ❤.. and he didn’t charge anyone 💝😊

[@lesleylesley5821]

An intellect and a great sense of humor, that's what makes him so exceptional.

[@mislaibeled]

Thank you Dr. Saad for coming on! It was a true honor to have you!

[@missm4731]

One of the most exceptional minds of our times! Thank you for your courage!

[@richardouvrier3078]

Dr Sad is probably one of the greatest minds of the 21st Century. Pure genius.

[@ab9388]

So so cool that he appeared on a Jewish podcast! Gad is such an intellectual gem!

[@cosmichouseofrose9788]

Thank you Dr Saad!

[@latinaalma1947]

I agree whole heatedly on Dr. Saad's of Jordan Peterson. But he is a cultural hero who would not bemd his knee to wokeism and for that he is a hero I have been a professor of clinical.psychology since 1979, now retired his contribution to the Five Factor Theory pf Personality was his major contribution to the field.

[@shmosel_]

I'm a consequentialist when it's useful.

[@johnwright1447]

@1:11:13 Dr. Saad, despite being so well informed on other issues, has been deceived by the Galileo myth. He was neither charged no arrested for teaching heliocentrism, which the Church never declared any doctrine for or against. He ran afoul of a dispute between two scientific communities, and was charged with attempting to re-interpret scripture to support a scientific theory.

[@delicious_crepes]

Finally.

[@docequis9796]

This is the sequel to Plato's Allegory of the Cave.

[@ReverendDr.Thomas]

Sings: “It ain’t necessarily so...” 🎤 philosophy: the love of wisdom, normally encapsulated within a formal academic discipline. Wisdom is the soundness of an action or decision with regard to the application of experience, knowledge, insight, and good judgment. Wisdom may also be described as the body of knowledge and principles that develops within a specified society or period. E.g. “The wisdom of the Tibetan lamas.” Unfortunately, in most cases in which this term is used, particularly outside India, it tacitly or implicitly refers to ideas and ideologies that are quite far-removed from genuine wisdom. For instance, the typical academic philosopher, especially in the Western tradition, is not a lover of actual wisdom, but a believer in, or at least a practitioner of, adharma, which is the ANTITHESIS of genuine wisdom. Many Western academic (so-called) “philosophers” are notorious for using laborious sophistry, abstruse semantics, gobbledygook, and pseudo-intellectual word-play, in an attempt to justify their blatantly-immoral ideologies and practices, and in many cases, fooling the ignorant layman into accepting the most horrendous crimes as not only normal and natural, but holy and righteous! An ideal philosopher, on the other hand, is one who is sufficiently intelligent to understand that morality is, of necessity, based on the law of non-violence (“ahiṃsā”, in Sanskrit), and sufficiently wise to live his or her life in such a harmless manner. Cf. “dharma”. One of the greatest misconceptions of modern times is the belief that philosophers (and psychologists, especially) are, effectively, the substitutes for the priesthood of old. It is perhaps understandable that this misconception has taken place, because the typical priest/monk/rabbi/mullah seems to be an uneducated buffoon compared with those highly-educated gentlemen who have attained doctorates in philosophy, psychology and psychiatry. However, as mentioned in more than a few places in this book, it is imperative to understand that only an infinitesimal percentage of all those who claim to be spiritual teachers are ACTUAL “brāhmaṇa” (as defined in Chapter 20). Therefore, the wisest philosophers of the present age are still those exceptionally rare members of the Holy Priesthood! At the very moment these words of mine are being typed on my laptop computer, there are probably hundreds of essay papers, as well as books and articles, being composed by professional philosophers and theologians, both within and without academia. None of these papers, and almost none of the papers written in the past, will have any noticeable impact on human society, at least not in the realm of morals and ethics, which is obviously the most vital component of civilization. And, as mentioned in a previous paragraph, since such “lovers-of-wisdom” are almost exclusively adharmic (irreligious and corrupt) it is indeed FORTUITOUS that this is the case. The only (so-called) philosophers who seem to have any perceptible influence in the public arena are “pop” or “armchair” philosophers, such as Mrs. Alisa “Alice” O’Connor (known more popularly by her pen name, Ayn Rand), almost definitely due to the fact that they have published well-liked books and/or promulgate their ideas in the mass media, especially on the World Wide Web.

[@CactusLegzz]

My man!!!

[@ianmiles2505]

Write a book on the parasitised society and parasite induced symboiosis, Stockholm syndrome for the purveyors of the parasitic ideology.

[@satiricgames2129]

😂😂😂😂 jog on

[@martingisser273]

You should have a chat with Bill Nye about climate science denial ... :-) And then talk about mass migration and perhaps "attribution science".

[@martingisser273]

BTW, not even most of mathematics is "settled science" - as first settled by Kurt Gödel... But then, most natural science basics can be regarded "settled science for all practical purposes" (to borrow from QM philosophy). Particularly, the basic differential equations of epidemiology should not be put to debate when a disease is rapidly spreading. If you don't understand multiplicative phenomena, just shut up. Else don't complain about being labeled a public health risk.

[@SrikanthMinna]

You're doing a fantastic job! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?

[@averynunley8872]

So Professor Saad is writing about suicidal empathy in the Western world, what about suicidal entropy?

[@nomadnorbert]

Did this guy really close a 200+ million real estate deal? That voice alone would have me running the opposite direction not to mention his face.

[@satiricgames2129]

All you have is lies ❤😂

[@shmosel_]

WORLDS COLLIDING

[@mortenlund4828]

Soslam dont like satire.

[@richardouvrier3078]

Dr Saad’s forehead is extremely broad indicating his massive IQ. Probably 195.

[@MarioMancinelli82]

Let America and Canada join the EU.

[@mariaradulovic3203]

I enjoyed it until the last minute when the stupid host guy said that he is on "all meat diet" jfc, first it's disgusting and unethical, second it destroyed the already fried brain of that poor guy JP. Wtf???

[@RickDelmonico]

Evolution occupies a small part of reality. We cannot use it to explain most things.

[@Derolo808]

Wrong.

[@Ux1.73c]

Discount your own biology to your own detriment.

[@hermitcard4494]

You obviously CANT use evolution to explain most of the things because MOST the things are inorganic, and the living organisms occupies a small part of reality.

[@RickDelmonico]

@@Ux1.73c Evolution has little or no explanatory power and yet it is touted as the answer to many puzzles. There are many forces guiding the organizing principles we observe and it is foolish to focus on the wrong ideas. The proper integration of concepts would be more useful. The evolutionary psychologist being of particular concern.

[@RickDelmonico]

@@Derolo808 Micro evolution does not explain punctuated equilibrium. Evolution has many flaws. The organizing principles have not been properly sorted out. What we have are stories not explanations.

[@satiricgames2129]

They forgot Honey Badger ❤