You may notice how Lon Chaney was very expressive with his hands as he acted. Fun fact is that both of his parents were deaf and he knew sign language. He really knew how to make his hands speak for his emotions of anger, hate, fear, ect.
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania4892 жыл бұрын
Indeed. The perfect actor for the silent era.
@dariusbates96772 жыл бұрын
That is so interesting. I used to do so much research on this guy. I dont know how this fact slipped by me
@czulem Жыл бұрын
@@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489 Perdona como se llama la canción del minuto 7?? Gracias!!!
@Mira_Dunia Жыл бұрын
Michael Crawford, the original Phantom in Andrew Lloyd Webber’s musical, used his hands a lot in the role as well (something he continues to do in performance even after his long run in Phantom). I wouldn’t be surprised if he was inspired by Chaney.
@wishmakr Жыл бұрын
That's an awesome piece of trivia, thanks!
@Hunterpugh15 Жыл бұрын
Fun fact my great great grandmother was one of the ballerinas in the opening scene of the opera in this movie
@NotCharlesMorse Жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@cynthiac21911 ай бұрын
That's really neat!
@cashette8 ай бұрын
Wow😊
@ConnieHeartsValentino8 ай бұрын
How exciting! She is now cemented in cinematic history!
@michaelhughes80578 ай бұрын
Really? Lucky her!😂
@demilung3 жыл бұрын
It may be almost a hundred years old, but man, Phantom's makeup is scary. That scene of him as the Red Death overlooking the conversation is actually chilling.
@mieshocked14503 жыл бұрын
It's an excellent make-up, but it's not scary. Not even a bit. *Erik* (not Phantom) is just a human being that was abused and broken because of his face.
@anushadeepala89982 жыл бұрын
Pp
@JohnSilverfan012 жыл бұрын
Best thing about the make up is that Lon Chanley did it himself.
@dollyrawlins54702 жыл бұрын
@@mieshocked1450 actually it would have been scary in 1925 but not in 2022.
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
@@dollyrawlins5470 understandable.
@nukelius Жыл бұрын
One thing that intrigues me is something about the rooftop scene that every adaptor throughout history seems to have missed. In the book, during Raoul and Christine's conversation on the roof, it describes _somebody_ watching them, and seems to imply that it's Erik eavesdropping out of jealousy. Later on though, during the POV chapters, it's revealed to have actually been the Persian, watching them to ensure their safety from Erik. It's a very subtle reveal, so it's not surprising that it was missed. Still, it's an interesting twist that has never been depicted in any adaptation, ever.
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489 Жыл бұрын
It’s a shame that The Persian is usually left out of the majority of adaptations of the story. Just another layer to the mystery of The Phantom.
@graceandglamour11 Жыл бұрын
Wait... It was the Persian all along???!?!?
@annibasarsinoe485 ай бұрын
Would have been nice if ALW made it Mdm Giry and gave her a song instead of the Phantom, since she is the Persian's replacement.
@Mira_Dunia Жыл бұрын
I honestly find the expressionless mask creepier than the Phantom/Chaney’s unmasked deformity.
@jodibray4889 Жыл бұрын
Same. It gave me the willies for sure.
@mieshocked1450 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely, if he didn't wear that creepy mask Christine would be less scared
@mieshocked1450 Жыл бұрын
And Erik is pretty fine though
@ErikDestlersMask6 ай бұрын
REAL 😭😭😭
@ErikDestlersMask6 ай бұрын
@@mieshocked1450real☺️
@anthonycrnkovich5241 Жыл бұрын
After nearly a century old, this is still hands down the finest and most faithful adaptation of Gaston Leroux's story. Nobody has ever topped Lon Chaney's brilliant portrayal of the tortured Erik, nor has any subsequent version captured the chilling atmosphere this classic generates at each viewing.
@VoxTheUkrainianComrade9 ай бұрын
I think the 2004 one is also great
@vaslav0305478 ай бұрын
The lake sequence's where pure magic. Chaney going in was real drama.
@jamsofjimin39072 күн бұрын
@@VoxTheUkrainianComradesame
@bigeyesbiglies31963 жыл бұрын
For me it is amazing that it is almost 100 years old and I can watch it on youtube
@kriitikko6 жыл бұрын
Okay, this is by far the best quality version of this film I've seen here.
@niclasnyman43796 жыл бұрын
kriitikko It is certainly a very good quality, but dont you think that the 1929 version here on KZbin is better?
@emilsuda41016 жыл бұрын
This is the best version on You Tube for the 1929 re-edit of the Phantom, Image Entertainment from 2011, David Shepard was responsible for the restoration.
@dougr.2398Ай бұрын
It has been “colorized” in a few sections
@wishingonthemoon1 Жыл бұрын
A few things. The acting in this is amazing. I mean just incredible. The cinematography is honestly better than a lot of what we see today. It’s nice that it’s very true to the original book. Great restoration, and whoever did the soundtrack, I love you. Maybe this is more of a social commentary, but I like that I’d shows Christine afraid of the phantom. Nowadays with obsessive love and toxic relationships being the new norm and romanticized/sexualized, it’s nice to see the woman being actually afraid after a masked man who is secretive pops out of a mirror and does give her details, kidnaps her, is obsessed, is one sided in his love, etc.. The original book is always sympathetic, but never romanticized his behavior. And yes a part of Christine loves him, but she wasn’t going to put up with this sort of stuff. And that’s refreshing to see. Edit: tho I’m sorry that the ending went the adventure/scary movie route. The original ending is such a beautiful message.
@KenzieSchmidt-tm9wj4 ай бұрын
i agree so much. it was so nice to see christine afraid of the phantom. it’s exhausting to see so many people romanticize his behavior and wish christine had chosen him, when in reality what the phantom had done was horrible. this movie did a great job showing how bad the phantom really was. of course christine would fear that man.
@mieshocked145013 күн бұрын
"nowadays obsession with toxic relationships" = women liking complex media that isnt sanitized and your puritan complex being offended by it. Did you ever read the novel? Christine's feelings towards Erik (aka a survivor of abuse with neglected mental illness) are much more complex than fear.
@mieshocked145013 күн бұрын
@@KenzieSchmidt-tm9wjit's exhausting to see moralists people like you policing what people should or shouldnt do. People ship Erik/Christine (and also sympathize for Erik) without the need to justify his actions. Cope ❤ Edit: Gaston Leroux himself was upset with the changed ending... so... uhm "the movie did a great job showing Erik bad" nu-huh ☝🏽🫣
@linkfan160 Жыл бұрын
After all these years, I finally watched this version and honestly, after 100 years later, it still holds up really well! I was really surprised. I usually find it a bit hard to stay focused while watching a silent film, but I was quite captivated during many of the scenes. And Lon Chaney still commands our attention, even after all these years. This is a small thing, but I love how Christine saved herself from the Phantom by jumping out of the carriage at the end. I was expecting someone else to save her, but no, she saved herself! That is SO progressive for 1925! I liked that she wasn't a complete damsel in distress and showed some bravery and courage, which was very unexpected for a film of this era. It's just a small part of the film, but it really sealed the deal for me.
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489 Жыл бұрын
The ending we see today is the second version of the ending. Originally, the 1925 film was to end like the book, with Christine’s kiss redeeming The Phantom, and him shortly thereafter dying at his organ. Test audiences hated it. So, it was cut and what we see today was filmed. Several other scenes were filmed, added, and removed before we got to the film we see today. Most of what was cut is lost to time and only still images of those scenes exist.
@covildofantasma Жыл бұрын
If you think this is "progressive", you should read the original novel. Christine didn't only save herself, she saved Erik, Raoul, The Persian and everyone else. She saved Erik from himself, she always had everything under control. It was Raoul who ruins everything during the story, actually, Erik was pratically her slave, her loyal dog that would do anything and everything for he- ...actually she didn't even need to be saved to be fair. The original ending is so much better, although Leroux himself wrote a sequel to the movie since, spoiler, Erik wasn't dead 🙏🏼 too bad the sequel never came out, since Leroux and Chaney both died... a tragedy 😢 But the point is: this story itself was always progressive for its time. Christine is strong and independent (remember she is orphan, single and has no man to be her "owner"), Raoul is an abusive and non-trustful character even being the protagonist, The Persian is a dark-skinned man with heroism and importance, Erik is a sympathetic and victimized aniti-hero that *clearly* has mental problems and still ended up being a better person than the protagonist himself - the deformed, mentally ill, and "vulgar" man is the tragic hero, not the conventionally handsome nobleman.
@covildofantasma Жыл бұрын
@@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489yes exactly, the only difference is the time the original ending takes to happen, and probably the cause of death too. It seem that Lon Chaney's Erik has some short of heart problems, specially when he puts his hand on his chest after Christine took off his mask... i think maybe because of strong emotions and body exhaustion? Although this Erik is only 32-33, he's not that old to have heart problems. Which leads me to think that, maybe, he developed a fragile health after years of abuse and isolation... yeah, getting arrested in the Devil Island's because he had mental illness is insane. The way mentally ill people were treated back in the 19th century is awful, so imagine an orphan, mentally ill and deformed person? 😢 While in the original novel, he takes some days to die. The cause of his death are confusing, but it wasn't because of Christine's kiss. Maybe he unalived himself, or maybe he was already sick or injured, idk... what I do know is that it seemes like Gaston wrote the ending with preassure. The novel was originally posted as jornal chapters, between 1909-1910, and as any other novel, the readers *did* influnce the progress. Which makes me wonder if Erik wasn't suppose to die originally... maybe Christine would even stay with him (much better ugh🙄 if she doesn't want him, i want). Anyway. It's heartbreaking in every way.
@blackngoldcuttlefish33906 жыл бұрын
I want to live in an alternate universe where they kept the original ending to this movie instead of changing it to the mob scene crap after the test audience. This Erik never got his character arc/redemption, and it's just such a shame because the rest of the portrayal was accurate. But Erik without the redemption is just..............not the same character. He hints at there being good in him here, but we never really actually get to see it (unlike in the book, where we do). A tragedy of the ages that I will never get over lol
@emilsuda41016 жыл бұрын
Hello Blackngold Cuttlefish: The best thing you can do and any one else (like me) would have to use Mr. Peabody's Way Back Machine--maybe Sherman might come to? and go back to San Francisco when the sneak peek movie was screened for audiences, that would be the best advice I can give.
@blackngoldcuttlefish33906 жыл бұрын
All right, let's do it! let's make it happen ;P
@davidbjacobs35984 жыл бұрын
Not too familiar with the plot before watching this just now, I was most definitely rooting him to get some redemption and even survive. He reminds me of Creature from the Black Lagoon.
@sageantone72914 жыл бұрын
Doesn't it exist somewhere?
@serahblair23743 жыл бұрын
@@sageantone7291 nobody has been able to recover it, but we can hold out hope that someday someone will get a hold of it! (Hopefully sooner rather than later!)
@coachgoltzbizpro233 жыл бұрын
I love the musical, but this version is fantastic! Chaney's makeup really seals it.
@davidpreston15192 жыл бұрын
I read somewhere that the scence where Christine reveals the phantom erik, it was so scary that people in the audience actually screamed and fainted in the theatre.
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, this is true. The monstrous drama and stupidy of these people is the scariest thing. Poor Erik. And to think that this kind (and worses kinds) of monstrosity happens to deformed people in real life...
@austinboucher52862 жыл бұрын
Another factoid: apparently Mary Philbin’s first sight of Lon Chaney in makeup was when he turned towards her right after the unmasking, so her scream was genuine. Apparently only the director had seen Chaney’s makeup before the reveal, so it freaked the whole crew out.
@dan56602 жыл бұрын
They did back then. They also tended to get lost in the fantasy of the film & believe for a moment it was real. It was reported people(mostly women) ran screaming out of their seats into the well-lighted hallway
@PrimeCircuit2 жыл бұрын
@@mieshocked1450 To be fair, Erik was no choir boy nor some poor Quasimodo with a golden heart. He was a prolific serial-killer, -abuser and worse, an ugly soul. Hurt feelings are no excuse. The book tells the story behind that character in full though I must say this movie probably did better in showing his true nature than the more modern ones do, who transformed him into a semi-decent looking merely misunderstood tragic hero.
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
@@PrimeCircuit To be fair, i can see you have *no idea* of who Erik was in the novel and much less what this movie did to the story, and it's pretty funny. Yes, he is a poor boy, abused by his parents, used as an object in a freakshow for years, tortured in Persia and rejected by everyone. "Hurted feelings" is your @ss. Hurted feelings is what your kind of "purity-police-stan" person get when they see someone standing up to an actual victim of abuse, like Erik. He was ABUSED and TORTURED, during years. It's good to see you haven't the SLIGHEST idea of what a serial killer is, Erik killed literally 1 person on his own voluntion and it was self-defense; he was forced to kill people in Persia by the King while also being abused by him (but it's always the victim's fault, according to you). Wow! I admire how Erik can be an abuser without abusing anyone, he is such a mysterious man, ins't him??? 🤔 This movie is exactly the opposite of what the novel is. I get it, you NEVER read the novel and if you read, your poor brain couldn't understand even the trivial about Erik's character, but let me explain to you step by step, baby: Erik loved Christine, NEVER threaten her life and was able to let her go because her happiness was more important than his. Here, his tragic past is ignored and he's turned into a monster without redemption, the final scene is a disgusting trash ending that ruined everything about the original ending. Erik was a broken, tortured yet good man desperate to be loved. He and Christine were friends until he became possessive. He knew trying to force her love was wrong and impossible, and even she showed him the kindness and compassion he deserved (something YOU are unable to do), this is why the original ending is great and beautiful. But this movie turned Erik into but a obssessive criminal, something he never was. And it's obvious that some people who have ANY IDEA of who Erik is and what the original story is about would love the ending. And how about the toxic, stalker and abusive viscount that Christine married? Oh no, this one is rich and pretty, we don't talk about him :3 I'm not using Erik's horrible past to say "haha kidnap is ok", i'm saying the truth, that he was a flawed yet good person that needed redemption (and he got it, in the novel). But you think he's evil and murderous and psycho, again, proving you missed everything and have zero empathy for ACTUAL victims of abuse. Keep being hipocrit and ignorant though, you're doing great!
@NemeyukoP2 жыл бұрын
I watched this film for the first time recently at a theater for Halloween. It had original orchestration from its organ. It was beautiful and I love this film.
@dannygjk4 жыл бұрын
Nothing compares to this. The tension, the chills, the fear.
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
Yes, tension, chill, fear... everything that _no_ Phantom of the Opera has since it's *NOT A HORROR STORY.*
@anastasiavaganov88312 жыл бұрын
@@mieshocked1450 ... Excuse me? Let's see... tension... chill... fear... those all apply to nearly all versions of Phantom, though there are many other beautiful aspects of the story. The original book is a Gothic horror/mystery/romance. The tension, chills, and fear are exactly what makes the story so appealing to many fans, combined with all the heartwarming scenes. A story, especially one like Phantom, absolutely needs tension; the entire story would fall apart if there wasn't the dread, fear, and hints of love ever-present. I understand that you don't want to see it as a horror story because you are so adamant that Erik isn't a monster. I would agree, but that doesn't change the overall atmosphere of the story itself. It's a beautiful story, one in which the "antagonist" gets a lovely and heartbreaking redemption arc. Exactly how would you describe the scene when Christine has to choose between the scorpion and the grasshopper? Was she not experiencing tension and fear? To say that there is no tension is an insult to the story and the author himself.
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
@@anastasiavaganov8831 when I say it is not a horror story, is because Erik's face shouldn't inspire horror. The story is a mystery gothic romance, yes, but linking "fear and horror" to Erik's face is the problem. People seem to forget about the beautiful, romantic heartwarming message it has (such as Erik's lovely and tragic moments). And he is not exactly an antagonist, he is much more like an unhinged anti-hero. No one is perfect in the story, there are no "heroes or villains". The closest thing to a heroine is Christine, she is brave, kind and independent. A bit childish sometimes, though.
@Kris-fq9bi Жыл бұрын
That part at 30:10 where his hand comes out of the left frame still makes me take a breath whenever I havent watched this in a while.... I think it's because it looks like there isn't much room between christine and the left side of the screen so you dont expect someone to come up behind her there, unlike if she was closer to the right side, and there was more obvious space to watch for someone coming up behind her. Assuming that was done on purpose, it's really clever. It was probably even more startling at the time.
@SeedyZ4 жыл бұрын
This is an incredible restoration, my goodness.
@samothy61184 жыл бұрын
I know it's a breathtaking presentation for how old the source material is
@JohnSilverfan012 жыл бұрын
I do have to say 'Kudos' to the makeup artist who did the work on the actor playing Inspector Ledoux and the actor himself. He has most mysterious eyes before it is revealed that he is of the Secret Police that anyone would suspect him either being the Phantom in disguise or elite with the Phantom. Kudos!
@finncullen Жыл бұрын
In the book there is a character called The Persian who knew Erik from the past and helped Raoul out. Given the costume and the make up of the character of Ledoux in this film that was clearly supposed to be him but the writers cooked up some nonsensical police/devil's island subplot as they wanted no loose ends of backstory etc for movie-goers, and the Persian became a French cop.
@countessD842 жыл бұрын
This is, by far, the best version. For me, the music suits the ambience of the movie. I've seen the 1925 version but with different music that just don't suit the setting of the mood at all. Thank you so much for sharing!
@pinkpantherkipz39654 жыл бұрын
the continuity department on this movie is incredible! if you look at the design of the rooms in the Phantoms Lair, ti actually matches up to exactly where the trapdoor under the rug is! round of applause!
@k0rny6724 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Lon Chaney is one of my biggest inspirations. The way he played characters and his movements were incredible.
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania4894 жыл бұрын
I just love the way he moves his hands. For a lot of this film we only see his hands.
@k0rny6724 жыл бұрын
@@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489 Agreed!
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania4894 жыл бұрын
@@k0rny672 I suppose it helps he grew up using sign language. They say he didn't speak until he was like 5. Or at least that's what I've heard.
@k0rny6724 жыл бұрын
@@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489 yeah, wasn't his parents deaf?
@b.d66423 жыл бұрын
It's incredible what he accomplished here: for the first half of the movie he has a mask on that covers his entire face, and in the second half he wears the most uncomfortable makeup (he actually ended up bleeding multiple times because of the makeup), yet for the entire movie he manages to express so much emotion
@Phaethon-f9n Жыл бұрын
The Phantom of the Opera is a mixture of Orpheus and Eudydice with Persephone and Hades. Besides having a bit of the Hunchback of Notre Dame.
@1SpicyMeataball7 ай бұрын
You're saying stories can be inspired by other stories? Well, no 💩 Sherlock.
@YTWarrior1006 жыл бұрын
Damn, Lon Chaney is phenomenal
@이재혁-h8z2 жыл бұрын
It may be almost a hundred years old, but man, Phantom's makeup is really scary That scene of him as the Red Death overlooking the conversation is actually chilling The Phantom Of The Opera 1925/1943/2004 will always be one of my favorite movies of all time
@aaronbarnes89346 жыл бұрын
May the universe bless you cause this movie is my all time favorite movie. I watched this as a little kid and it's the exact version I watched and I love this film so much. I thought I'd never find it again. Thank you so so much. Now I can show my boyfriend this perfect film.
@MusicBoxVinyl3 жыл бұрын
This movie will soon be 100 years old
@TisNessie2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this!! I just watched this with my husband and we’re fans of the musical but this film is amazing! The colour and music added makes it much better and there are so many scenes that I was just amazed at seeing in the 1920s! ❤
@henbane22472 жыл бұрын
The book is also amazing if you haven't read it
@nursingjewel05175 жыл бұрын
This is the best version of Phantom of the opera. Music, editing, quality, and color tone is top notch.
@Ayden_B4 жыл бұрын
Best version on KZbin. I watch it every October
@Disneylover2023 Жыл бұрын
This version of this film is breathtaking! Literally!
@issilranitae2 жыл бұрын
The melody from 54:30 to 56:50 is very reminiscent of davy jones + calypso's love song...
@brcsephina Жыл бұрын
i hear it
@bubblekitty6033 Жыл бұрын
WOW MAN YOU'RE RIGHT
@tassodemo23162 жыл бұрын
my new obsession is watching insanely old movies for no reason i will not be elaborating further.
@juliahornback28432 жыл бұрын
I have been since I was 17
@carowolff4702 Жыл бұрын
Such an excellent movie! It holds up well after 100 years
@blakerackley8874 Жыл бұрын
I have this same version and I find the music is so fitting for the sequences, more than other symphonic arrangement. Thank you for uploading a very clear version!
@joeomalley28353 жыл бұрын
Wonderful that you posted this. I have always been fascinated with the book, musical adaptations, soundtracks, and film versions of this classic.
@JustPlayTheGame767 жыл бұрын
I love this version of the film. The quality of the film is amazing when paired with the music. Thanks for this gem of a movie.
@RobertLee-oc6xb5 жыл бұрын
Do you happen to know which version this is - I'd like to buy it , but don't want to end up with a rubbish copy! Thanks?
@nursingjewel05175 жыл бұрын
This is the 1929 version, score by Gabriel Thibaudeau.
@waffenssbryce78385 жыл бұрын
What happened to the version with the music by Carl Davis?
@jonathanbuxton69913 жыл бұрын
This is the best version ever with this wonderful music score
@alanbash29212 жыл бұрын
AT 43:52 Mary Philbin accidentally knocked into the Violin that is hanging on the wall And it starts to rock.........IVE BEEN WATCHING THIS MOVIE FOR OVER 50 years and just noticed this TODAY !!!!!!! Great Print !!! ....let’s try to find the COMPLETE 1919 Miracle Man ....SOMEBODY out there has a copy !
@christinedaae7323 Жыл бұрын
Poor Erik! He’s skin and bones! He needs meat on his bones for sure! I’m not sure when the last time he’s eaten. Poor love!
@caludiaojeda21568 ай бұрын
Exelent film! 👏👏👏👏👏
@cultofj3777 Жыл бұрын
This is beautiful music, it really compliments the film quite well.
@garywaddell90073 жыл бұрын
Great restoration. Shows you don't need shed loads of CGI to make a good film.
@richardflores88047 ай бұрын
The actress whom the phantom loves, she's "SO BEAUTIFUL!!!"
@matt2socalАй бұрын
Her name was Mary Philbin. She was the early film's ''Scream Queens''
@Seeker_Blade2 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful and tragic masterpiece.. one of if not the best silent film of all time
@alanbash29212 жыл бұрын
Pure GOLD !………Lon Chaney Was The Greatest Actor in Film History .
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania4892 жыл бұрын
Definitely the finest of his era and among the greatest actors to ever live.
@farter_snail3 жыл бұрын
Just sat through that, holy shit that was incredible.
@dan56602 жыл бұрын
Though this is a favorite, I feel "Hunchback of Notre Dame" comes in first as Chaney's masterpiece of conveyed emotion- which still puts today's acting to shame. Much of his brilliance came from being raised by two mute/deaf parents & how he learned to communicate with them.
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania4892 жыл бұрын
If there was an actor born for silent cinema, it was Lon Chaney.
@huh9684 жыл бұрын
the score is amazing, especially in the third act
@mahler1514 жыл бұрын
Agreed! Need to know who did this and if it's available anywhere.
@benhuether54744 жыл бұрын
I hope they eventually find the original alternative ending to the film.
@videoplusdvd3 жыл бұрын
Since the original nitrate footage would at this point be 95+ years old, it would have turned too goo long ago.
@emilsuda41013 жыл бұрын
Ben Huether: the original ending is most likely gone. What would be better in finding would be the cemetery scene, that would explain some loose ends in the story. But again this seems to be gone!
@b.d66423 жыл бұрын
@@emilsuda4101 what loose ends?
@emilsuda41013 жыл бұрын
@@b.d6642 Christine refers to her father (who is dead) but by having the cemetery scene re-instated it would clarify that point. PLUS and IF you are paying careful attention in the scene where Erik forces Christine to choose between the scorpion or the grasshopper which one to turn, Christine looks upward towards her father in heaven and asks him for guidance. You know this if you read her lips--there are no sub title cards for what she is saying at that point.
@jdzencelowcz Жыл бұрын
What I really like about these films being on YT, U can pause the vid & actually read the txt cards, & U can speed up the vid if U feel like it's moving too slow.
@stephenkolarac5305 Жыл бұрын
This is a beautifully clear print of the film! Thank you so much!
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
35:56 - 40:09 this whole part is so cute, romantic yet heartbreaking the same time! It's so good to see Erik expressing his feelings for Christine ❤️ but what bothers me is how much forcely scared she is!!! It's so childish and unnecessary, poor Erik 😢
@sin33582 жыл бұрын
To be fair, this whole movie is a whole metaphor about how people treat ugliness. Although, Erik kidnapping Christine wasn't a good thing at all
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
@@sin3358 The whole story* i mean, the novel is the original. And yes, i know this metaphor, i'm a phan (phantom of the opera fan) since 7 years, i love this 1925 movie but the ending was terrible. And surely kidnapping Christine was a bad thing, but it wouldn't happen if Erik was treated as the worthy person he was. I hate what adaptations turn Christine into. She looks like a dumb child scared for nothing. She is way better and stronger in the novel, even if she's still childish.
@sundus9282 жыл бұрын
@@mieshocked1450 The original novel is set around 1900s ,so no wonder even at the time of this movie's release ,people were stupid. It's only after stories like Beauty and the Beast , Hunchback of Notre Dame that people got the "Empathy" for broken ,ugly souls. Let's just say ,we should be grateful to be born in this era.
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
@@sundus928 Both Beauty and the Beast and The Hunchback of Notre Dame came before The Phantom of the Opera. Even today, people are still stupid, but at least society is starting to fight against every type of opression. Our days is undeniable better than the past.
@del25913 жыл бұрын
Classics such as these will never go out of fashion or be viewed as 'passe'.... Thanks for posting this slice of cinematic history! 👍👍👍
@tommykiryu7776 жыл бұрын
26:52 Not gonna lie, her scream was hilarious.
@geroldgrimel48114 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha! Thank you.
@JohnSilverfan012 жыл бұрын
Groucho Marx: What was that? A High C or Vitamin D?
@nathankelly35093 жыл бұрын
26:53 very well done chandelier
@lloydsmith5223 жыл бұрын
Lon chaney truly was the man of a thousand faces hes the one who started classic horror hos son lon chaney jr topped it with the wolf man
@raveast3 жыл бұрын
How about his grandson/granddaughter and great-grandson/granddaughter?
@lloydsmith5223 жыл бұрын
@@raveast I'm not trying to get into argument about the chaneys that's ones I grew up with Sr and jr
@raveast3 жыл бұрын
@@lloydsmith522 I only ask about his grandchild or the great-grandchild,pardon because I'm not grew up with them.
@lloydsmith5223 жыл бұрын
@@raveast Ronald chaney is stilll alive he brought back the wolf man remake with benicio del Toro and anthony Hopkins hes 65
@jamessheridan43063 жыл бұрын
Actually this print is the 1929/1930 edition which was drastically altered to accommodate a sonorized soundtrack. It is, however, the only edition I know of that contains the mysterious "man with a lantern" sequence.
@JohnSilverfan012 жыл бұрын
This is the version I want on DVD. It's so clean an crisp! So well restored!
@sherriweibert3311 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic. I enjoyed every minute. Lon Chaney's character is positively terrifying!
@evmergingdarkness5028 Жыл бұрын
What a phenomenal film
@simonf8902 Жыл бұрын
One if the greatest stories in entertainment indeed.
@august_astrom3 жыл бұрын
10:15 His face was like "Why the hell are these people staring at me?" lol
@mieshocked14502 жыл бұрын
I love the whole part when Christine goes to Erik's lair for the first time, he confesses his love for her even though he's shy, it's so cute and heartwarming! ❤️ If at least the ending was correct! 😭😭
@R0B0562 Жыл бұрын
01:27:00 the ending with the music is so beautiful
@Ourladyrules2 жыл бұрын
first saw this forty or so yrs ago. a brilliant film, truly a cinematic masterpiece . the lighting, choreography, actors all top notch. thank you for broadcasting this film. 🥂❤️
@MrDizzyvonclutch Жыл бұрын
15:10 I never knew about Rasputin living and working in Paris as a conductor! Whoa! lol
@andyrushep2 жыл бұрын
Great to have the opportunity to watch this awesome classic on you tube. Thank you for sharing 💖
@k-popislife97152 жыл бұрын
When the phantom was playing the organ he knew she was going to unmask him because he saw the curiosity in her eyes.
@christinedaae7323 Жыл бұрын
All I can say about The Masquerade scene in this version is, “And what a Masquerade!” Indeed it is!
@marclayne92615 жыл бұрын
Silent Films, say more than the talkies, to this day.....
@kostajovanovic37114 жыл бұрын
Steady there
@OverlordOfCats4 жыл бұрын
Nowadays people have to yell to get heard.
@ughcreature4 жыл бұрын
hurr durr back in my day durrr
@sergiowinter53833 жыл бұрын
@@ughcreature ok post-modernist
@katherinemoore98226 күн бұрын
I've recently discovered how cool these old movies are. First I watched metropolis and was like HOLY CARP! And now this gem. There so relaxing and so much less stimulating and even play in the imagination like live theater. exciting.
@thuringwethilvaire67727 жыл бұрын
Love this movie so much!!
@stephenvelez97102 ай бұрын
What a great film, gorgeous to look at, and wow, nearly 100 years later, the look Chaney created for the Phantom is iconic. Great quality on this. The tinting works really well, and this score that goes along with it is superb.
@bradyopizza53754 жыл бұрын
It would be cool to see a modern silent film
@MrFuglybear4 жыл бұрын
I haven't seen it, but I think The Artist is basically a modern silent film
@propanekid6864 жыл бұрын
@@MrFuglybear it's a good one. Worth looking up if you like silent films
@serahblair23743 жыл бұрын
@@MrFuglybear yes! I’ve seen it and it’s what introduced me to the silent film genre. Very good!
@arpadczyliwampir3 жыл бұрын
I can recommend a modern silent film Blancanieves, it's amazing.
@serahblair23743 жыл бұрын
@@arpadczyliwampir oooooo what’s the plot?
@tetoterritory4 жыл бұрын
After the movie was initially filmed in 1925, it was shown to movie theaters of an unknown amount where the people who saw it HATED it. A re-edit by a redditor was made shortly after, ALSO in 1925 where people still hated it. And then a big brain redditor made the final re-edit, STILL in 1925, where it was a success, gaining $2,000,000 dollars at the box office, equivalent to $29,758,628 dollars in the year 2020. In 1929, they made a sound version after 1928-1929 made stereo sound possible. Both the 1925 and the 1929 versions are partially lost. A 16MM Show at Home print was made sometime during the 1930’s for people to show at home with family, which most copies have been destroyed or lost. The most common version was made by the Eastman House and dubbed as the ‘Eastman Print’ was made in 1953, the same year that the film went under public domain, and what’s weird about it is that there’s different CAMERA ANGLES than from both the 1925 and 1929 versions, because they were filming with 2 cameras in 1925. The last theater or home media mess-around was made 11 years ago, in 2009. It shows the 16MM print and the Eastman Print together in a split-screen Adobe editing software version. One last thing, the first scene of the movie has a mysterious man with a lantern, and he weirdly hides twice, and he’s talking, which means that it MUST be from the 1929 sound education edition of Minecraft- I mean the 1929 sound version of the Phantom of the Opera, but looking at the 1925 silent version, the SAME scene is there, even with a close-up not seen anywhere. Since the film is in public domain, go wild, attempt to color it, dank meme it, YTP it, do whatever to it.
@xtinalee14667 жыл бұрын
43:05 the oldest phantom theme
@adamnomdeplum35 жыл бұрын
Xtina Lee Actually this isn't the oldest. This is a newer score
@geroldgrimel48114 жыл бұрын
"Uh... Sir? This is a church..."
@cheyenneasiafoxe2922 жыл бұрын
Just such a wonderful film from.the Era of Lang, Pabst and Metropolis and Caligari to name a few..the wonderful German surreal expressionist film of the 20's and 30's.
@neftaliriverajr503 Жыл бұрын
Seriously just finished viewing it and thanks KZbin for posting the entire 🎥 it was my very first time seeing this Iconic classic Horror Film that I will see dailies on film documentaries of horror or in film books. The Movie is Good seriously very good with action thriller scenes and love how Channey moved about in the Opera house with his mysterious ways as the PHANTOMMMM HEHEHEHEH! A toast 🥂to you Channey wherever you are in the afterlife,🌈 you did phenomenally well-I AMM YOUR ANGELLL OF MUSICCCCC🌹
@JanisDay2 ай бұрын
It might be almost 100 years old but its still a classic film.
@margaritasalt066 жыл бұрын
Wow, this was my first silent movie other than the🎼 and vocals during certain scenes I am amazed at the Theatrical talents who such wonderful and emotional moving parts Bravo👏👏🎊🎉💝 and the ending heart stopping marvelous..
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania4896 жыл бұрын
Debra C. Solomon Solomon indeed. This is one of my favorite silent films. Lon Cheney was so good at conveying emotions through his face and hands. And the makeup work was wonderfully done by Cheney. So glad you liked it.
@coldshoulder85503 жыл бұрын
@@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489 0
@HarborGuy3 жыл бұрын
WOW!!!!!! What an ending--
@rudolphvalentinoconnection82982 жыл бұрын
A "relative" through marriage actually was in the "skull" costume around minute 50:00.. This version is different, however, from a non-colorized version where the Phantom goes down a single staircase...not sure which is the original cut... ....He was an extra and the story goes Lon Chaney was tired so they put Frank into the costume and he was the one going down the stairs!! Frank also was in The Four Horsemen in the tango scene in the audience and later in the club, dancing behind Valentino's left shoulder as he and Alice Terry in the white-plumed hat danced. Norman Kerry, of course, was one of Valentino's early friend in Hollywood...rooming with him...
@lisamarie71362 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Grazie!
@Mordred_Malet3 жыл бұрын
he didn't deserve to die in that way...and even at the end, he jested to the wild crowd!
@errolwaguespack34473 жыл бұрын
Incredible movie.
@Raze_134 Жыл бұрын
If ever you have an opportunity to hear Clark Wilson play his organ score for this film, take it. I have never before been so gripped by a soundtrack.
@TrentonBlessWrestlemania489 Жыл бұрын
I’ll have to find that version.
@oldfan19633 жыл бұрын
58:00 - On , a battalion of the 14th regiment blocked the boulevard to protect François Guizot. In the evening, a crowd of demonstrators tried to break down the barricade. The soldiers fired, killing 35 people and wounding 50. The demonstrators put the corpses in a dumper and called the people of Paris to arms.
@roxyeeyee_89795 жыл бұрын
Omg this is a good one. Chilling!
@StevenStone-cw8yo7 ай бұрын
Watch Mary Philbin's eyes before she unmasks the phantom. Acting is.superb.
@skullfilms93013 жыл бұрын
loved it!, Hated the fact that the mob killed Erik, other than that, it was Good!.
@sharonellis87762 жыл бұрын
This was simply amazing! The music, set design, locations. xx
@Rach13132 жыл бұрын
💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 I am beyond lucky to actually own this incredible film that came as an(I believe) 25 to 50 classic nonverbal b&w and older early horror films collection and I ABSOLUTELY ADORED this version; especially how similar to the book(that I also adore) that it is!
@benhuether54744 жыл бұрын
51:14 Has anyone else noticed that the open space between the phantom and the crowd resembles a coffin? (SWOON) "God, between this, Dr Caligari, Haxan, and Nosferatu I love the artistic beauty behind the gothic expressionist period of the silent era ❤️❤️❤️!!!" (PS, The Red Death is possibly the most beautiful and extravagant costumes in cinema history)
@aisnota51924 жыл бұрын
If only he kept the mask on. He looks REALLY silly in red without it.
@SusanDoran3 жыл бұрын
The scene when he's on the spire, observing them unobserved and in agony, while the wind whips his red cape around him, is gorgeous.
@b.d66423 жыл бұрын
This isn't considered German expressionism but it is beautiful when it comes to the set, acting and shadows
@cedthebear3664 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing this
@pamnaz2 Жыл бұрын
I watched the whole movie...loved it!!
@Paxloria4 ай бұрын
This Silent Movie version of "PHANTOM OF THE OPERA" is pretty good. I also recognize Lon Chaney ("The Man With A Thousand Faces"). He was very famous way back then. The "Face" he's wearing here is the one he's most famous for. He didn't hesitate to suffer for his art. The makeup technology at that time was to lacking (compared to today) to meet his acting needs, so he used various painful methods to deform & transform his face to fit his various Roles.
@ThemeParkSoCal Жыл бұрын
The fact that this 1920’s classic movie was recommended to me I’m not in to classics but I sure I like this movie and I love how back in 1920’s these types of movies were all silent with music and captions
@Idk-fp8lf2 жыл бұрын
19:25 raoul like “the hellllll”
@andreymurravtsov5235 Жыл бұрын
Masterpiece!THX!
@michaelhughes80578 ай бұрын
This the best movie version of Phantom of the Opera!