The Research on Ivermectin and Covid

Interest in the antiparasitic drug Ivermectin has increased drastically as of late thanks to the belief that it can help to prevent and/or treat Covid-19. In today’s episode we examine recent data on the efficacy of Ivermectin as an antiviral and discuss the history behind how it gained this reputation.
Related HCT episodes:
Vaccines Against Variants: • The Delta Variant and ...
Covid and Blood Types: • Do People with Certain...
Be sure to check out our podcast!
• Podcast
Other Healthcare Triage Links:
1. Support the channel on Patreon: vid.io/xqXr
2. Check out our Facebook page: goo.gl/LnOq5z
3. We still have merchandise available at www.hctmerch.com
4. Aaron's book "The Bad Food Bible: How and Why to Eat Sinfully" is available wherever books are sold, such as Amazon: amzn.to/2hGvhKw
Credits:
Aaron Carroll -- Writer
Meredith Danko - Social Media
Tiffany Doherty -- Writer and Script Editor
John Green -- Executive Producer
Stan Muller -- Director, Producer
Mark Olsen - Art Director, Producer
Images and Footage
iStockphoto.com/jarun011
Videoblocks
Wikimedia Commons
Videoblocks.com/SergioStock
Videoblocks.com/emiryorda
Videoblocks.com/ESMAndrewR
#healthcaretriage #covid #ivermectin

[@dlyscas]

My favorite comment in the video “…it’s sometimes given to humans” - yes, hundreds of millions of times!

[@ericsalinas98]

Now it's FDA approved

[@michaelviehl4981]

Just bull .It works,I tried it,felt better immediately

[@TheFarmerboyproducti]

I can tell but you weird use of commas that you telling the truth

[@jhonklan3794]

Thats not how science works. You were likely on the road to recovery anyways + placebo.

[@ronsws6]

If you felt better immediately, that's called a placebo effect. No antivirals will make you feel better immediately... Not even within hours.

[@vanesaorozco3524]

I believe you. I’ve tried and it works

[@flatbrokemodsquad4241]

I used it after I got sick. positive results in 5 hours. worked great!

[@jamesb.9155]

From what I've read I'm a bit concerned when I give it to my dogs since the per kilo dosage and what the box recommends are a little difficult to reconcile.

[@mickeysmcgee]

Didn't see a better place to ask this but do you have any information on Monoclonal Antibodies and Autoimmune Disorders in relation to Covid 19. I trust your information and would really just like an idea of when it needs to be used and which disorders it may be negative with. Any advice? thanks,

[@ZarliWin]

take it as you may, but a Doctor friend that hasn't shown me any signs of being crazy has said that Monoclonal Antibodies can do a lot to help, once you're infected, but it's def better to take the vaccine to reduce things before you have to get to that point.

[@Mr.Beauregarde]

Consult a doctor... in an office. If you see it in a comment section, well, that's where doctors are so it's probably trustworthy. Have you tried just a teensy bit of bleach though? Cause I have a plan for you

[@666ndr]

@@Mr.Beauregarde Thanks, Todd.

[@rickkwitkoski1976]

MCAs are ONLY effective if you are at the BEGINNING of an infection. But they are a treatment, not a prevention. In the majority of things in our lives, most of use go by the addage that prevention is better than a cure. Or to be proactive and not reactive. So why would anyone not be proactive and get vaccinated? Taking a chance of being cured is pretty risky. Also MCAs are VERY expensive! And for the krischin nimrods who rail against vaccines being made from dead babies (they aren't!) MCAs use the same human cell lines to actually manufacture them. Plus other things that such nimrods might find distasteful in some way. Autoimmune Disorders. If you have such, your immune system is not producing antibodies and killer cells as it should and would have a more difficult time fighting off a COVID infection as well. PLUS these people may also not get enough protection from a vaccine for the same reason. Their immune system just isn't seeing the foreign proteins as dangerous and is not producing what it should. So these are people at risk no matter what. These are some of the people around us that NEED the protection of the HERD!!! The non-selfish and community minded among us who actually GOT vaccinated!

[@SineEyed]

@@rickkwitkoski1976 imagine un-ironically referring to yourself as a herd animal and being proud of it. 🤣 Way to go champ! Team Sheep is #1 ✔ You just might wanna... you know... keep your heart rate down the rest of your life is all..

[@scurveteamsix]

Can you make a video explaining how vaccinated people still get and spread COVID-19? What kind of prevention/treatment can people do for COVID-19 at home?

[@gyozakeynsianism]

Vaccinated people still get and spread Covid-19 because no vaccine is perfect. And there's the other issue that the protective power of vaccines may wear out over time, requiring boosters or even new vaccines every once in a while (like the annual flu vaccine). But of course HCT would explain this much better than me!

[@creshiell]

Prevention and treatment is the same as for the Flu, which is unfortunately incredibly unhelpful lmao

[@poopsmagoo]

The best prevention is limiting exposure. Masks!! 🥰 If you're wearing a mask don't forget that eyes are also mucus membranes; I've encouraged some friends to get vanity frames (no prescription in the lenses). I've been working in retail healthcare the whole time & started double masking last March. I can't emphasize enough how important it is to keep physically distanced from other people and (properly) wearing a mask.

[@scurveteamsix]

@@gyozakeynsianism I understand that no vaccine is perfect, but 1/2 of my military unit received the vaccine and 3/4 of the unit went down with COVID including those vaccinated. This would appear less than perfect and doesn’t stand up to vaccines almost decimating diseases like measles, polio, smallpox, etc.?

[@scurveteamsix]

@@gyozakeynsianism appreciate the discussion!

[@nyralotep]

Unfortunately real research is ignored by many in favor of FB doctors, memes and confirmation bias.

[@kostya4857]

This video is an clear example of misinformation and bias against a proven lifesaving drug, Ivermectin.

[@rizzobitz]

I blaim the media. Journalist used to cover both sides of the news. You heard the doctors for and against something controversial then you were able to make a more informed decision based on your situation or at the very least your opinion wasn't polarized to one sides agenda. Right now all you hear are pharma funded FDA regulators, doctors who comply with FDA and horse paste drama. Making fun of a medication that is in clinical trials showing success against a deadly disease by only showing horse paste on the news and reporters saying ivermectin is "only for animals"...its all bad journalism. Many of the people who are taking ivermectin have a prescription from a doctor. It's just happenstance that this has become political. Prior to vaccine roll out people who followed the July 2020- January 2021 ivermectin studies in humans were not anti vax republicans. They were people everywhere, from all sides, who wanted to save themselves or their loved one because there was no vaccine. News has polarized everyone and distracted them from what's really important, saving lives.

[@webaj3124]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5OYqatnqqmnqac

[@webaj3124]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnfEY5-ueZuslaM

[@georgehewn2992]

@@rizzobitz regardless of whether it’s effective or not. Couldn’t agree more with what you said about the media. It’s the media’s fault that everyone is acting out of confirmation bias. They really used trump as a way to normalize a painfully obvious bias. I mean where can you get reliable unbiased information nowadays. Nowhere!

[@tommychook4552]

it works great?, but no profits

[@narnigrin]

Aaron: "... are those people right?" Also Aaron, at the same time: *shakes head*

[@rainerunsinn123]

thank you for stating the obvious Erika

[@rootsm3]

Very subtle lol

[@ninjavader]

This is a brilliant video! It would be awesome if the description contained links to the research cited in the video.

[@thepope2412]

It would also be awesome if it included any of the many studies that show ivermectin works

[@davidbromberg3067]

I was able to see the flaws in the research in the first 30 second, IVERMECTIN DOES NOT WORK ON ITS OWN, IT IS USED IN A COMBINATION, The research IS FLAWED!! ON purpose. . SAME AS HYDROXYCHLORIQUINE does NOTHING on its own, IT IS USED in COMBINATION of other drugs, THIS RESEARCH is flawed and FAKE!!!

[@thepope2412]

@@davidbromberg3067 Which combination is ivr used? I know hqc is used with zinc and maybe zpack

[@griznation9942]

It is an awesome propaganda based video.

[@frutbum]

Research? The data was rigged.

[@dalesherman2218]

are we still testing iverm. ?

[@GoneZombie]

I am ravenous for any treatment that might be effective against this horrible disease (except obviously for anything that is actually approved to treat it).

[@tiacho2893]

I love the "there's some data and some studies that show ivermectin works", meanwhile ignoring FDA approval and millions of people that have be given the various COVID vaccines. But I have yet to find someone pro ivermectin that can explain to me how a nerve agent suddenly becomes effective to treat a viral infection. Even more basic, I have yet to meet someone pro ivermectin that can explain why antibiotics aren't used to treat COVID. That is the level of science ignorance that is needed for these conspiracy theories to take hold.

[@JoeAuerbach]

I'm going to take everything! Except the one thing that is both free and proven to be effective

[@suesmith9905]

@@tiacho2893 because ivermectin invades the cell & nucleus disabling COVID 19. Imagine that.

[@smears6039]

@@suesmith9905 source?

[@DonaldAMisc]

@@tiacho2893 The comments on this video...🤦‍♂️

[@ProgShell]

Hey listen I took this and not only am I almost worm free I also am haunted by dreams where I run through meadows on all fours, wind whipping through my mane. I fly like the wind, free from the worms that have tormented me so lo these many years. I turn and see an apple tree, I reach up with my horse mouth and grab one. It is sweet and tart. I am worm free. I am in paradise.

[@gyozakeynsianism]

Yeah, paradise until NPS comes for you. Hope you like the auction block, Ed!

[@theblackout27]

is that you Todd Clorox?

[@XxThunderflamexX]

Finally a medication to achieve my furry TF dreams!

[@brianoailpin6844]

🎶.My lovely lovely lovely horse(my lovely horse x2) Running through the fields Where are you going with your feltlocks flowing in the wind. 🎶

[@TakeWalker]

That's not the drug, you're just a brony.

[@ssdd28561]

My favorite quote about "in vitro studies" (maybe even from this channel): "You know what else kills viruses in vitro? Guns. Guns kill viruses in vitro" In vitro is always just a beginning. Tons of things won't get to the animal test because the dosage would be fatal. Tons of animal studies are stopped, because working in vitro drugs don't work in animals. Tons of primates stidies won't show the rats' results. Tons of human studies can't replicate the effects of animal studies. But guns do really kill cancer cells / viruses in vitro.

[@thepope2412]

Good thing ivermectin is well tolerated in humans

[@storyls]

@@thepope2412 There’s a famous saying in pharmacology, “the dose makes the poison.” Everything is toxic if given in sufficient amounts. Water for example is toxic if multiple gallons of it is drunk in one sitting. Ivermectin is no exception. It may very well have anti viral properties at very high concentrations, but these would certainly kill a human. It’s not safe to take in massive quantities like we are seeing now. In fact one can easily google the lethal dose of most drugs. Lethal Dose 50, or LD50, is a common statistic used to determine what dose of something is needed to kill 50% of the population. This is tested on most major drugs using monkeys or rats. For ivermectin, it’s about 24 milligrams per kilogram of body mass. Of course this is actually a fairly ridiculous dose, an average human would have to eat about 10 tubes of horse paste to achieve this, but toxicity occurs well below the lethal dose.

[@thepope2412]

@@storyls Well no fucking shit you got anything interesting and not blatantly obvious to say? Point is that ivermectin is safe and well tolerated. The dosages it's being given out in covid trials are well within the safe range.

[@storyls]

@@thepope2412 The dosages given in the human trials are safe. The dosages in the human trials also aren’t doing anything against Covid.

[@thepope2412]

@@storyls Wrong. Plenty of studies say otherwise Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines

[@dianesoper708]

You can get a different ivermectin and it is fine. Been used for decades

[@NikkiTrudelle]

Does anyone have the sources for the information about ivermectin being ineffective?

[@TheGerm24]

Um, did you watch the video? He listed studies and papers.

[@smfknj6010]

He says in the video the results Arnet “much more effective”. In other words, it’s effective to a degree

[@thepope2412]

@@TheGerm24 Yeah he cherry picked a few studies that showed it was ineffective. But guess what, there are only a few studies that show that compared to dozens that show effectiveness.

[@lewistt1326]

Podcast #87 on Rick and Bubba University has Dr David Williams on it. He said that he has treated over 300 patients with Ivermectin, and none of them ever hadvto be admitted to the hospital.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@thepope2412 Yes it seems cherry picked. The first two pages of search results give at least three meta analyses papers that find major benefit.

[@charlietuba]

I heard that misinformation about ivermectin came from EweTube.

[@ThisIsReMarkable]

The people who visit that site are total sheep. Pasture point of no return, really.

[@charlietuba]

@@ThisIsReMarkable They are what's a metaphor.

[@greenredblue]

It's infuriating and baffling how many people will violently reject known, proven, studied, safe, convenient, reliable, obviously effective, and _free_ prevention measures... And then clamor for toxic snake oil. DO YOU _WANT_ MEDICINE OR NOT.

[@spongeintheshoe]

They want medicine that doesn't defy their pre-existing beliefs.

[@greenredblue]

@@spongeintheshoe Well precisely, which is what's infuriating. "Belief" is given absolute importance over things like verifiability, reliability, even safety. If you have some expectation that something - anything - has some benefits / drawbacks, (especially when lives are literally at stake,) there must be a solid basis for believing that thing. E.g. I can refer to some credibile authority who can explain all of the benefits, risks, probabilities, mechanisms, outlier conditions, historical development, and more. But the logic we're dealing with here doesn't extend beyond *"how **_DARE_** you question me?!"*

[@spongeintheshoe]

@@greenredblue *"how DARE you question me?!"* I think that's more or less the conservative motto at this point. It makes sense that someone raised in a religious household would think that way.

[@cobrasys]

This. Some of the comments and replies on this video leave me with very little hope (or care, honestly) for humanity.

[@inlandempress4587]

AND THEY BUY THESE DRUGS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES 🤦🏽‍♀️😶 INSANITY

[@CandycaneBeyond]

Do you have the links for these studies?

[@yoshy2628]

Here - kzbin.info/www/bejne/lZPPk4mpbcp1i80

[@edithallma4810]

Is this the same drug they have used to treat cancer ?

[@nmarbletoe8210]

"sometimes" used in humans should be "one of the most common human medicines, worldwide"

[@ddexter8723]

Yup almost 250,000,000 people annually.

[@elinonbjartalid807]

Since the horse version is pretty much sold out in America and people are shitting out their insides out, it's fitting to say used for humans sometimes.

[@ddexter8723]

It's made for HUMANS too almost 250,000,000 use it annually. But I guess you can add a few more million on to that number this year for those who took the stuff that was meant for animals.

[@elinonbjartalid807]

@@ddexter8723 if you have riverblindness yeah. Not covid.

[@daveruda]

yep and many many cows and horses with worm infections...not covid.

[@davestratton7060]

Would be interested to hear the details around the one study and why it was considered fraudulent.

[@healthcaretriage]

Here are a couple links with excellent details: gidmk.medium.com/is-ivermectin-for-covid-19-based-on-fraudulent-research-5cc079278602 steamtraen.blogspot.com/2021/07/Some-problems-with-the-data-from-a-Covid-study.html grftr.news/why-was-a-major-study-on-ivermectin-for-covid-19-just-retracted/

[@davestratton7060]

@@healthcaretriage - Thank you so much for replying, and for all the research you bring together in your videos.

[@darkdragonsoul99]

Might have something to do with the doses required for something to happen would kill you

[@imakevideos5377]

@@darkdragonsoul99 oh wow

[@mynameismike9595]

@@ivermectinworks4517 where is your evidence?

[@pedroavellarcosta9389]

Cries in Brazilian

[@paulsnyder4979]

What about the NIH efficacy study?

[@otralee]

So good. Thanks so much

[@chickenpants]

I love the work done on this channel. My question is, how much of this is preaching to the choir? Do these videos get to the eyes and ears of the people who most need it? Love your commitment to the evidence. You guys have changed my mind regularly.

[@Matkatamiba]

Apparently not entirely preaching to the choir, given the decent chunk of downvotes already

[@m136dalie]

I think many people choose to believe what they like and will disregard evidence that doesn't conform with their beliefs. The antivax crowd in particular comes to mind.

[@minabotieso6944]

The people saying I want to wait for FDA approval on the vaccines also say I do not trust the FDA or government

[@grantcivyt]

I just made a comment along these lines. There is an effective way to speak to vaccine-skeptical and pro-ivermectin communities, but this video wasn't it. A few of the problems: - horse in thumbnail, - ignoring the Tess Lawrie meta analysis, - ignoring the protocols by FLCCC that are much lower than the toxic amounts mentioned in the video, - highlighting the FDA's tweet that ridicules people using the veterinary version of ivermectin and conflating that with all ivermectin use, and - nodding to the debunked stories about floods of ivermectin cases coming into poison control and hospitals. You have to engage honestly with the concerns and ideas that are in play without resorting to ridicule. I've been vaccinated since last year, and I'm not clear on the ivermectin situation! The recent McMaster study (awaiting review) was very helpful. Videos like this one are much less so.

[@chickenpants]

@@grantcivyt I'm not criticising the video. Just wondering if they've done 'the research' to see if their work is going to be seen by people who aren't already convinced. There has been a lot published recently about how to engage with vaccine hesitant people, and showing the evidence isn't the best way to engage.i think I'm asking more broadly, has this channel increased the number of people who are engaging in evidence based medicine? It would be fascinating to see the numbers on that.

[@trentonx]

I think it's clear that it's not helping but also why is there never mentions of India I feel like I would love to see someone prove that point wrong so I could stop thinking that it's important

[@BartGasiewski]

I think what you're referring to is when India announced it as a treatment for covid patients, then covid cases decreased? It was thought of as a treatment, not prevention. So the cases dropping doesn't show that it worked. If rates of death and severe issues dropped then maybe. The drop occurred a week after the announcement. So in 1 week a country of more than 1 billion all got ivermectin to slow the number of cases?(ignoring treatment vs prevention point). That didn't happen, again treatment, meaning you already got covid and they are giving you ivermectin. Why the cases went down is pretty classy though, people reacted to the rise, coworkers that were there visitng parents said basically every other household on the street had it and people just locked down and stopped going out, everything was delivered that could be. And the important part is, when the announcement was made the R factor(rate of infection) had already dropped below 1.0, which meant the number of cases were going to start dropping soon, which they did. Hope that helps.

[@Strazar605]

@@BartGasiewski In India now they have a few hundreds dead compare to thousands daily before they used Ivermactin.

[@BartGasiewski]

@@Strazar605 Sure, but cases are way down from social distancing and their mortality rate % is relatively unchanged. Which is what Ivernectin is supposed to reduce, but isn't.

[@HIPPIETHUG92109]

Aaron, Can you please send me the links to the research studies which you are reading from on this Ivermectin study?

[@wompus_king]

I just imagined bears of false information.

[@Jay-ho9io]

It's just plain science. Spectacled bears can't be trusted.

[@DanBoyd1111]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i4i5pGWtqLKFnZI

[@suesmith9905]

@@DanBoyd1111 Thank you bootleg. Too many don’t do the research, parrot dictators talking points to their own detriment, don’t do research and don’t follow ALL the science, which of course would be the SCIENTIFIC way. Just by how they talk/message u can tell. Bots & Trolls.

[@DanBoyd1111]

Well@@suesmith9905, I learned a long time ago never to just blindly believe or trust anything I'm told. I had a great teacher by the name of Bill Cooper (BEHOLD A PALE HORSE)!! The sad part, is that it took me just a few minutes to uncover this material!

[@_typhoid_mary_]

Me, trying to buy ivermectin for my animals and it’s intended use: okay :/

[@flagmichael]

The status of ivermectin as an off-patent drug changes the market dynamics. Several companies make it at relatively predictable rates for agricultural, and some medical, uses. It is inexpensive, and therefore low profit margin. If it is going into people there is less available to go into grazing animals.... and nobody wants to make more facilities to respond to a market bubble.

[@SineEyed]

@@flagmichael that kinda looks like a misdiagnosis to me, troubleshooter. There goes that perfect record.. 😞

[@dianeriley9032]

If you need a dr to prescribe ivermectin for humans go download Push Health app and request a medication of Ivermectin.

[@slopjawjohnson6380]

Lol. It's been used by tens of millions of people and many credit it for saving hundreds of thousands of lives in India

[@SineEyed]

@@slopjawjohnson6380 correction... it's been administered nearly 4 *billion* times, and has likely saved *millions* of lives..

[@jasonmathias5343]

What about the study out of India that showed a 82% reduction in Covid among healthcare workers?

[@xaviermagnate]

Been debunked everywhere!

[@shooster5884]

@@xaviermagnate Boloney... Bots against Ivermectin everywhere... There's such a war against it that speaks volumes in it's favor. Almost every finance at stake, powerful body is terrified of people en masse taking it and living to tell the tale. You gotta admire this little workhorse of a drug with all it's repurposable mechanisms taking on the powers that be.

[@SpySappingMyKeyboard]

Boomers: Dang kids eating them tidepods Also Boomers: Give me some of those horse meds

[@Medhead101]

Ivermectin is more of a human med, just used more in Africa and in areas with high parasites. It won the Nobel prize and on the WHO list of essential medicines. Saying it's an animal product to disqualify it is stupid

[@MegaKootz]

@@Medhead101 I absolutely agree. calling ivermectin an animal product is like calling apples HORSE food.... Turns out, they have more than one use.. IMAGINE THAT!

[@creshiell]

@@Medhead101 the biggest problem is that poison control centers and ICU beds have been overwhelmed by people taking the horse one. Sorry, I've lost the empathy to respect others, even if youre taking the human one that does absolutely nothing, I'm still calling it a horse dewormer

[@SpySappingMyKeyboard]

@@Medhead101 I'm not saying it to disqualify it, I'm saying it because it is a humorous way to convey the fact it is disqualified (see: this video).

[@jhonatancock2302]

@@creshiell stop spreading fake news, there was never " ICU beds have been overwhelmed by people taking the horse one"

[@DidiLassen]

Well look at the state of Uttar Pradesh in India with 220 millions and only 19 new cases of covid.. Why.. Because they treat early covid with ivermectin. Ivermectins antivirale properties has been known for 10 years. Looks like trials can be used exactly as you want

[@Paraselene_Tao]

1, India's government lies. They have millions of undocumented covid cases, and hundreds of thousands of undocumented covid deaths. 2, the kits had much more than ivm in them: information about social distancing and quarantining, vit c, vit d, zinc and doxycycline. There's no way to know if ivm helps when you give so many other things with it. Quit drinking the kool-aid.

[@milomilo55]

They also implemented massive lock downs at the same time so ....

[@Paraselene_Tao]

@@milomilo55possibly the most comedic part of this is that anti-vaxxers and ivm cult members would rather believe the corrupt Indian government over our (slightly less) corrupt USA government.

[@DidiLassen]

@@Paraselene_Tao The USA is one of the countries that have done absolutely worst in handling covid and you want the rest of us to join you in your misery. More than 50 % of the population fully vaccinated and still your numbers are crazy.. You need to learn from others and not try to inforce your faild strategies on the rest of the world

[@DidiLassen]

@@Paraselene_Tao Well.. If it works.. It works.. One thing is for sure.. What you are doing in the USA does NOT work very well. You are among the nations that have handled this crisis worst even if you have fully vaccinated more than 50 % of the population.. You should NOT try to teach the rest of the world how to handle covid.. It's a joke

[@donaldjohnson2038]

It works. We know for a fact.

[@lesleyd9969]

Based on what?

[@griznation9942]

@@lesleyd9969 did you ask this same question about the purported effectiveness of the so-called v@xe$?

[@lesleyd9969]

@@griznation9942 Yes.

[@mikebayless4268]

Doesn't bleach also wipe out C ovid

[@petitio_principii]

UK data pointed out that even a flu infection "more than doubles" the risk of death from covid, bacterial infections being even worse. That kind of hints at the possibility of some confounding effect of dewormers in eliminating potentially aggravating comorbid worm infections (or infections of other parasites with nervous systems), even though there is also at least one study suggesting that maybe some intestinal worm infections may be somehow somewhat "protective" against worse covid outcomes. Which would then be a confounder in the other direction. All that kind of discounting that the main theoretical mechanism(s) of anti-viral action would require concentrations that are not ordinarily achieved, though. I nevertheless vaguely remember reading something along the lines of ivermectin (maybe other dewormer) possibly being useful in up-regulating interferon production or release, which the virus itself would be somehow blocking/evading, maybe that wouldn't need super-high concentrations, but then I'd guess that the effects would be more clear, comparable to those of administration of interferon itself.

[@normanspurgeon5324]

Sir- go to FLCCC Alliance to read up on ivermectin. It's clear that you are unfamiliar. It is not exclusively a worm treatment. This is a derogatory smear by interested groups.

[@petitio_principii]

@@normanspurgeon5324 it's a broader anti-macro-parasitic, kills even the mosquitoes that bite you, but not the only dewormer that was tried against covid.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

Why cite four studies finding "no effect" and not the three showing significant benefits...? e.g. Zein et al 2001. Ivermectin and mortality in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Dia Metab Syn 15(4): 102186

[@NaumRusomarov]

Because it's a meta-analysis that includes the entirely falsified data by Elgazzar 2020, which has been retracted (it wasn't even published, it was just a preprint)?

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@NaumRusomarov Oh interesting! I'll check on that in the references.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

@@NaumRusomarov I see you are correct! Of course, since their analysis used 18 RCT's, nixing that one may still find "large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance."

[@thepope2412]

@@NaumRusomarov And removing the elgazzer study has no effect on the results and actually increases the prophylactic benefit slightly.

[@TheJrod91]

People literally post in vitro studies and I just fucking laugh

[@xaviermagnate]

It's just crazy how we're literally witnessing the results of a failed educational system...

[@Roshkin]

Bleach works on covid-19 in in vitro studies. Also kills human cells tho.

[@TheJrod91]

@@Roshkin lmfaaao

[@thepope2412]

@@xaviermagnate Yeah. If people were able to read the scientific evidence they would conclude ivermectin works. Sadly you get videos like this that completely cherry pick the subject and the gullible sheep eat it up.

[@sylviaalger4917]

Can you explain Japan and India’s success then?

[@ZAELish]

Massive increase in vaccination rates combined with strict lockdown measures and there was no mass use of ivermectin in japan. Can you explain the high covid death rate in brazil even though they were using ivermectin

[@wil_son6598]

Can someone explain to me why when people argue for Ivermectin they give examples of India using Ivermectin right after the delta variant got out of control and it’s use in Peru and other South American countries to control the spread of Covid? Just looking for a friendly discussion and someone to explain this to me

[@wil_son6598]

@@ajapril10josh54 so was it working?

[@wil_son6598]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jorZZGOdbLl-jK8 I found this video very helpful to understand the Ivermectin situation in India

[@NoUploadsEver]

@@wil_son6598 Peru had their covid numbers down something like 14x lower than the standard when using Ivermectin. Lefist health minister gets installed and bans it, numbers go up 13x. Also every Indian state (yes a large nation is divided into regions/provinces/ect) that used ivermectin had no problem with delta. Only the ones that banned it, stopped using it, or mass adopted the vac had problems with delta.

[@obsessivegel3979]

@@NoUploadsEver Bro I just looked this up and it's complete bullshit. Absolutely no proof that shows that this drug links to lower cases of covid at all. Look it up.

[@michiganabigail]

That poison control center calls comment is based on an erroneous statement made by someone who said that they were turning calls away from the poison control center, but he didn’t even work there anymore. He didn’t know.

[@healthcaretriage]

We based that comment off of this: emergency.cdc.gov/han/2021/han00449.asp -Tiffany

[@jhonatancock2302]

According to NPDS Bulletin COVID-19 "1,143 Ivermectin exposure cases reported to the 55 U.S. Poison Control Centers (Jan. 1, 2021 through Aug. 31, 2021)" 20% No effect 43% Not followed, minimal clinical effects possible 3% Not followed, judged as nontoxic exposure 13% Minor effect 8% Moderate effect 1% Major effect 0% death Total 102 cases this year of any notice with ivermectin in the year. this guys really really really like to create fake news and panic . The sweet little angels at the CDC didn't print the total numbers because they are embarrassingly low. There are around 3 million poison calls a year and normally 24% end up in hospitalizations. Ivermectin is absurdly low in comparison.

[@webaj3124]

Fake news already busted. Rolling stones had to retract, it was a disgrace

[@timdion9527]

@@healthcaretriage Seriously? Two patients went to the ER from taking too much horse paste? That's a rapid increase?

[@healthcaretriage]

@@timdion9527 I think you read the two examples they included for demonstration - those weren't the total cases. -Tiffany

[@ceaget7252]

Try telling that to the doctors in Uttar Pradesh, India, who have prescribed Ivermectin to millions of patients with unprecedented positive outcome. These are trained, qualified doctors who are not idiots.

[@kullwarrior]

Should've said "you're not a sheep...literally" instead of the "you're not a horse, you're not a cow..."

[@spongeintheshoe]

"You're not a horse, you're not a cow, and you've made it clear you're not a sheep!"

[@marvin216]

What about the meta analysis?

[@danparish1344]

The retracted studies are always talked about, the couple studies that show no effect are talked about, but the dozens of double blind studies show statistical significance - especially as a preventative or early treatment.

[@griznation9942]

Yes but don’t reference the link to these double blind studies or the medical and science “experts” at YT will remove your post.

[@gerathys]

There weren't any, that's the point!

[@SpeakShibboleth]

ID10T "But it kills viruses in a dish!" Doctor being sarcastic "so does bleach." ID10T "Funny you should say that"

[@gyozakeynsianism]

And - complete coincidence here! - ID10T's favorite president forced Lysol to make a public statement on their website saying that people should not ingest their product.

[@matthewsuttinger4179]

Todd Clorox strikes back!

[@AileTheAlien]

Can't be infected if you're dead. (taps side of head)

[@thepope2412]

You probably missed the part where ivermectin is so safe that even taking a 20x dose is unlikely to give you anymore than a tummy ache

[@gyozakeynsianism]

@@thepope2412 Still does nothing for Covid.

[@Hayley-sl9lm]

Omg thank you! Sharing.

[@alexi9469]

new video out - kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5TNpaN_gN6eq9E

[@backindabay]

Really. Sharing freaking lies. Read more. 📚 these prices are just disingenuous

[@AlecMuller]

Real science always shows its work. Where are your links?

[@michtig]

I've always been a fan of this channel, but I have to admit that I have been swept by the wave of distrust for the FDA and CDC during the past year. I wish this video addressed why Dr Pierre Korry, an ICU doctor working with cov patients every day, feels strongly about using ivomecting.

[@SineEyed]

Yep, this video is clear evidence that the information given out by this channel cannot be expected to be objective..

[@rautermann]

It does mention him, though not by name. See 3:21 onward for why HCT thinks this paper should not be taken into consideration. Note: I do not know the full story (neither do I care for an online argument). I just wanted to point out that it was addressed for anyone who thought that Kory et al. weren't mentioned at all.

[@SineEyed]

@@rautermann you seem to be countering a point nobody made..

[@rautermann]

@@SineEyed Maybe not yet, you're right! It was meant as a preemptive strike against anyone pretending that Kory wasn't mentioned. Hopefully my comment will not be needed, but I am afraid it will.

[@Alex-qx7jn]

When the horse sees you lurking around his medicine cabinet 🤨🐴

[@ivermectinworks4517]

Africa, India and Mexico Ivermectin is sold over the counter.

[@Silverizael]

@@ivermectinworks4517 That's because the parasites that cause river blindness, the disease in humans that ivermectin is meant to be used for, are primarily found in those regions. That is not the case in the US.

[@webaj3124]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnfEY5-ueZuslaM

[@DanBoyd1111]

THIS.......kzbin.info/www/bejne/m2SopHZ_n9ulidk

[@tobiisiba1641]

@@Silverizael you are choosing to remain stupid at this point,I live in Nigeria,and we are using it to treat people with symptoms of covid or covid.

[@taberfrench]

It’s very funny to watch this video after having watched the one where he speaks of the strong biases present in the medical research field when it comes to publishing studies 😂. Basically if big pharma is going to lose money because a study shows their drug is ineffective or dangerous, it doesn’t get published. If a safe and cheap drug gets better results, they’ll also lose money so it won’t get published. They will however fund studies to “debunk” the negative study.

[@michelledax4083]

This is what Dr...

[@michelledax4083]

...Marik has to say:....↙️

[@Midlosoup]

Trump

[@williamrivas7809]

Can you comment on the American journal of therapeutics meta analysis showing an 85% reduction in mortality?

[@digbickland4634]

Exclusion of bad data mad the analysis bunk.

[@awfullyawful]

Don’t let the propagandist in the video fool you. Notice the total absence of zinc in his talk. We know the unmentionable drug works in combination with zinc and isn’t meant to be a standalone.

[@digbickland4634]

@@awfullyawful do you ever take a step back and think about how ridiculous you sound? “Hey global pandemic guys, these national and international economies were ground to a halt and some almost failed. Almost limitless amounts of money and expertise ave been applied to addressing the issue, but they’re all stupid because they aren’t taking some OTC drug or chemical accompanied with zinc” you are puny and you’ve been so successfully deceived that you are willing to hurt other puny people. Touch grass.

[@awfullyawful]

Dig Bickland hush manlet. We’re not on the same level, little one. Good luck to you🙂

[@williamrivas7809]

@@digbickland4634 really weird I can’t post the link on KZbin without it disappearing… if you are actually curious about the results of the meta analysis google American journal of therapeautics and scroll down to the letter to the editors regarding ‘defamatory’ remarks like yours and they changed the report to exclude the studies with “bad data” and still came to the same conclusion.

[@mhurbi]

Look up Uttar Pradesh ivermectin. You will see that their covid is practically gone after making ivermectin available to everybody. States in India that did not use ivermectin had 10 times the covid. Use your brain.

[@Paraselene_Tao]

IVM cult members like you love to bring up Uttar Pradesh when everyone in the world knows how corrupt the Indian government is. 7% of Indian deaths are never registered, and it takes over a year for more than 50% of deaths to be registered. Of the deaths that are registered, most are not correctly categorized by cause of death. India has millions of undocumented cases and hundreds of thousands of undocumented deaths. You trust the Indian government to tell the truth about Covid and IVM, but you don't trust the US government about IVM or vaccinations? You're in a cult.

[@laquerisma]

The ignorance is palpable.

[@briandagley7083]

How much did they pay you to say this

[@jordanhanning9667]

The point isn't that some studies show no effect. The point is that its a relatively safe drug, that has helped some people, that isn't being allowed to be prescribed by politicians.

[@IonianGarden]

How do you know that the drug has helped some people? Can you provide a study to back up that claim?

[@jordanhanning9667]

@@IonianGarden American Journal of Therapeutics analyzed 15 studies and found that it had a reduced risk of death compared to no ivermectin. There are doctors all over the world recommending it. Even if we assume it does nothing at all, its safe to take. There is no harm in taking it. It being banned by congress, preventing doctors from prescribing it is absolutely ludicrous. A drug that could even potentially save lives, even a small percentage of lives, with no harm to the patient? Media outlets referring it as the "horse dewormer", despite it being used in humans for 40 years, having 4 billions doses administered, and winning the nobel prize in 2015 for its use in humans?

[@IonianGarden]

@@jordanhanning9667 There is no harm taking homeopathy, and there are fringe studies to support it, and the who people take it also claims "it works", so does that mean we should use homeopathy for a Covid cure? Of coarse not. The point is that there is many studies show that people being treated with Ivermectin has no effect. The harm is people who think they are being treated when they are not. Just as dangerous as homeopathy.

[@jordanhanning9667]

@@IonianGarden Again, that isn't the point. If someone is in your hospital dying of covid, and Ivermectin might help them survive, is safe, and its forbidden for doctors to prescribe it. That is straight loony toons crazy. Also, its not homeopathy. Its an actual medicine. What you are describing are off label prescriptions, which happen all the time.

[@IonianGarden]

@@jordanhanning9667 But how do you know that Ivermectin might help them survive? If there is not enough evidence to convince the medical community to suggest that Ivermectin works, then what is the difference from prescribing homeopathy? Last year it was Hydroxychloroquine.

[@BiPaganMan]

Even if it was effective, can't help but remember the saying "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"

[@richardlaroche9167]

What about that latest study Elsevier New Microbes and New Infections Volume 43, September 2021, 100924 ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[@PedroCouto1982]

Did you read it? It doesn't seem to be the case. The article you mentioned is titled "Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19". It was published online in August. It's not a study. It's a "mini-review" (according to "New Microbes and New Infections") written by people like a gynecologist and an Australian gastroenterologist who is "a principal in Topelia Therapeutics (Ventura, California), which seeks to commercialize cost-effective treatments for COVID-19, including IVM". The article is just criticism to objections: "An objection(....) was that none of these RCTs had been published in mainstream peer-reviewed scientific journals. (...) Another objection that has been raised to the RCT evidence supporting IVM efficacy was that study populations were too small" And: "(...) compared IVM with two other drug treatment groups but not a placebo group and found no benefit], and an additional study conducted in Cali, Columbia with mix-ups between treatment and placebo doses as described below". You can read it.

[@ciggityliggity7039]

Really

[@helenhenthorn4948]

Currently the number of Ivermectin prescriptions dispensed per in the is estimated at 88,000, (According to the National Prescription Audit database {NPA Weekly}, as of 8/31/2021), a roughly 2000% increase since the beginning of the year. An increase in calls to poison control would naturally follow. So media and government reports of increases are meaningless. The WHO also has an adverse drug effects database (Vigibase) supporting the impeccable safety record of IVM.

[@hanshoz]

seems like big pharma sponsored studies made it in this (very questionable imho) channel. what about 60+ studies, over 40 of those peer reviewed who say otherwise? what about real world usage, that showed fantastic results in various countries, most notable india. and in india, people who believed WHO (world health organisation) guidelines and methods, suffered horrible compared to those who followed ivermectin + vitamins + zinc. you can't say uttar pradesh in india is small sample size, as they have over 200 million people and very dense populated. but who cares about those facts? or frontline workers who swear, on top of the data, nothing showed progress and success like ivermectin for humans. sure, big pharma says it doesn't work, while earning insane money on mrna experimental drugs, also one of the ivermectin producers (merck) has a 1.2 billion dollar deal signed with the usa alone. ivermectin on the other hand, no patents, everybody can produce it cheap. oh boy, i wonder why big pharma sponsored "doctors" "channels" "news" "who" "studies" show different results than independent studies and real world usage with millions of success stories. yea who do i trust, the criminal big pharma and those who profit from companies going up in value (bought shares, like bill gates, one of the biggest if not biggest donor of world health org) OR frontline workers, independent studies and real world success stories in different countries?

[@MrDzoni955]

Why not provide sources for at least some of these 40+ peer reviewed studies? He provided sources for the studies that he talked about.

[@FoScoJo]

Why are so many doctors writing prescriptions for Ivermectine anyway? Isn't that unethical?

[@timdion9527]

Because there is a significant body of research that shows Ivermectin is effective at treating Covid-19. And, doctors are empower by medical license to make decisions for what is best for their patients. It is ethical not to provide early safe treatment for Covid-19?

[@FoScoJo]

@@timdion9527 But it isn't effective for COVID. There is zero evidence to support that claim. And just because it is legal to prescribe it for COVID does not make it ethical to do so.

[@Bookhermit]

Why would it be unethical? There is a good chance it's effective, an excellent chance it's harmless, and it saves people from being tempted to use veterinary products.

[@FoScoJo]

@@Bookhermit The chance of it being effective is virtually nonexistent. The chance of it being harmless middling at best. Why might it be unethical? Prescribing a medication with a middling chance of harm while being effectively ineffective for COVID simply because the patient asks for it? The question answers itself.

[@thepope2412]

@@FoScoJo Because there actually is overwhelming evidence but you have not looked for it.

[@justkiddin1980]

How about those Washington state inmates??

[@Midlosoup]

Keep them there

[@kewrock]

So I'm going to take a tweet from an official government agency that uses vernacular like that?

[@solaris0000]

it's a tweet.

[@kewrock]

@@solaris0000 But it sounds like it was posted by a poorly educated street dweller.

[@djhero0071]

For all you know, it could be an intern or social media manager from the south. You don’t gotta be an asshole about it.

[@oliverwilson11]

I agree, I only listen to government tweets if they're in Latin

[@KimberFarms]

Not allowing dying patients access to IVM or HCQ goes against both the Cares Act and Trickett, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act.

[@won20529jun]

While I agree whole-heartedly with everything said in the video, you bring up a good point that I think needs to be discussed as well - and that is the "risk-benefit" ratio. While there isnt much evidence to back the benefits of ivermectin, its also not such a risky drug either. So for incredibly sick patients who are willing to try it, I think its use can be justified. (But I do want to add that hydroxychloroquine was shown to be potentially proarrhythmic and thus harmful esp in patients with preexisting heart conditions, so I dont think it should be recommended in critically ill patients)

[@andrewfinlay5160]

Kimberly right on...

[@alexi9469]

new video out - kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5TNpaN_gN6eq9E

[@harshbarj]

It's so sad that we have reached this point.

[@DanBoyd1111]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i4i5pGWtqLKFnZI

[@DanBoyd1111]

What's sad, is how people still blindly trust the Government & the media even after they've been caught lying countless times!

[@harshbarj]

@@DanBoyd1111 Who says anything about the government or the media. Pick up a medical journal some time. Ivermectin CAN'T cure or prevent Covid-19. This is demonstrable. And thanks, reported that video! Misinformation must be stopped!

[@DanBoyd1111]

We're sliding straight into Totalitarianism, and blind obedience to so called "authority" is the driving force behind it!......kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHawnammgr5qr9k

[@DanBoyd1111]

Blind obedience leads to Totalitarianism........kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIbcY5-XmrB2hJo

[@hitachi9778]

We need to consider the experience of the state of Uttar Pradesh in India - where the widespread use of ivermectin for prophylactic and therapeutic use has eliminated covid 19 from 53 of its districts. In contrast, the incidence in another state of India - where ivermectin is not used - deaths from covid 19 in the month of September continues to be 300 times more than in Uttar Pradesh.

[@atmanand5802]

💖

[@backindabay]

Oooooo no they won't.mention that or the many other countries were it has been effective

[@rgbii2]

Yea, but, should I take my horse down to CVS to get vacinated? /s

[@flagmichael]

I can't stop myself: A few months ago I was in a convenience store and felt something - I assumed it was a large dog - brush roughly past me. I turned to see a woman leading a goat through the store. Okay.... I asked the clerk about it and he said she was a regular and that the goat never caused trouble. Flagstaff really isn't _that_ rural!

[@jiffyb333]

Darn, would be nice to have secondary treatments.

[@NaumRusomarov]

there are. corticosteroids improve outcomes for patients with severe covid symptoms, monoclonal antibody treatments also appear to work very well if given on time (but are very expensive). these are the things that work. the best treatment still is to get vaccinated, there are several vaccines that are proven to be safe and effective against covid 19.

[@paxundpeace9970]

ASS and Heparin for hospitalpatients against blood clots

[@SinHurr]

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, as they say. Get vaccinated, folks!

[@setarehmariposa9571]

Look up Dr. Pierre Kory. They've been researching this since pre-covid. They also have said not to use veternairy usage of the medication.... Maybe it's hard to get ur doctor to prescribe it to you due to this vaccine situation going on.

[@sonopro1]

Being for or against is not my topic here, only the sincerity of this guy that I am listening to for the first time. "It is sometimes administered to humans"...WoW ! "sometimes" equals 3.7 billion doses for humans alone and a Nobel Prize for the results on humans. After 30 seconds, you should know this guy is not in good faith. You should be very careful.

[@tal3nt661]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/m4CclJ2vaLesmsU

[@friendlyoctopus9391]

THOS'R JUST THE HORSE WORM TALKIN

[@yuri6947]

It's not necessary to use this arrogant tone to promote your point, actually, it's very counter-productive for more intellectualized people who are trying to discover the thuth about this subject. There are a lot of studies regarding this question that were convenently ignored in order to achieve your goal. V

[@lesleyd9969]

What studies were ignored that would have otherwise supported the efficacy of ivermectin?

[@potacambell8122]

I've done plenty of horse tranquilizer so why not

[@maestasify]

I hear you whinnying/braying.

[@wilbert2678]

Hey, I see you mostly only included the negative results of the RCT while not even mentioning FLCCC (Front Line COVID Critical care, which says there are already 60 or more other RCTs about ivermectin (made in the pandemic alone)). This amount to selective bias, no? One of the members of FLCCC which deals with COVID in ICU everyday since last year, dr. Pierre Kory have numerous webinar on youtube discussing about it (yes, actual hourly scientific lecture). Maybe you can check it out.

[@ivermectinworks4517]

kzbin.info/door/5rJlf5jdr_I6qiozbQdx-g

[@webaj3124]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5OYqatnqqmnqac

[@odalayme]

Garlic did wonders for my parasites 😉

[@lrwerewolf]

*grumbles* I know. Guess who those nosferatu who were peacefully borrowing space from you - even sticking to their bat forms so they could fit in a roost box - ended up moving in with. Yeah, you know how embarassing it is to be the werewolf having to take in a family of homeless vampires? Thanks, butthole. :P

[@odalayme]

@Jondahl Davis lol. That's a tough one. Garlic is a know virus fighter and it is know to stop viral replication. And actually a known covid inhibitor. Gotta eat it raw. I grow it and use it regularly. Cooking kills the organosulphers.

[@KCH55]

It actually can with getting rid of parasites.........but also those other types parasites.......and anyone else

[@hindikakasa4296]

@@odalayme you won't get covid if you eat raw garlic. Covid infected people won't get near you.

[@rohithkumarsp]

Doctors in India are prescribing Ivermectin 12mg for 5 days for all covid patients

[@opmules2574]

Didn’t the DHGS drop ivermectin in June? It’s no longer part of the guidelines for treating COVID.

[@rohithkumarsp]

@@opmules2574 got tested positive September, still got reccomended. So probably not.

[@timberrr1126]

It worked for me. I took it on Day 1 then on Day 4. All gone.

[@mike_skinner]

I was given Ivermectin (Ivexterm) and I recovered overnight. I was late stage and I wasn't given anything else.

[@therabbithat]

It's been treating river blindness (yes, in humans) for years, I hope it turns out to work for Covid too, it will be a while and many studies before it's proven and there's not even one study proving it yet. Of course it should go without saying that you get it prescribed because the dose that is suitable for a horse could kill a person.

[@PedroCouto1982]

I got a cold, I drank water, and I recovered overnight. Don't forget to like this comment.

[@HJR8581]

You were given nothing at all in the hospital?

[@janyenyo]

@@therabbithat fast forward, Mercks "pill" for covid, only a little over 700 study participants one trial, fast tracking approval now Thats ok for a new patented drug, but for IVM, nada. No one will put money into a proven safe drug thats been used for 40+ years, that is out of patent. I have iVM in my emergency kit, had to get it overseas because it's over the counter outside the USA.

[@AlexTorres-qv3hv]

Very interesting after the meta analysis of ivm was peer reviewed and published so many Goebbles type propagandists started to pop up like gremlins....

[@Grandmas_Favorite]

For real… Most people don’t even know about the meta analysis from Oxford…

[@danutadobrowolska7879]

They don't take Oxford study for reliable sources but Facebook

[@rik061154]

@@Grandmas_Favorite I take Tess Lawrie's meta analysis seriously.

[@phyllisbooth3395]

@@rik061154 I do too. Ivermectin works and it is murderous not to promote it. Thank God for people like you and Dr. Tess Lawrie.

[@baratoplata7050]

@@rik061154 Tess Lawries meta-analysis includes multiple pre-prints that have been rejected from peer review for fraud. She's also an anti-vaxxer and runs the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development who make hundreds of thousands of pounds from donations on their website to "help promote this miracle cure". Go check their website and the first thing you see is them begging for people's money. It is so corrupt.

[@silvialorenzana9530]

I just took Ivermectin, not sure whether I have a simple cold or covid-19. Nonetheless I took the 1st tablet 20 mins after I'm feeling better.

[@rg5445]

I see dogma

[@WBKimmons]

IVM works

[@yazilliclick]

Appreciate this video, good summary with enough details on it to cut through the bs

[@thepope2412]

Nope. he completely cherry picks his sources. dozens of studies show ivermectin is effective including multiple meta analysis which review the studies.

[@Low-Fi-SCOTT]

@@thepope2412 I used to be a conspiracy theorist. It never ends. There's nothing that can convince you. You are the idiocy of today. Wake up pal

[@thepope2412]

@@Low-Fi-SCOTT sorry but I have dozens of peer reviewed papers to support my claims, not random news clippings

[@Low-Fi-SCOTT]

@@thepope2412 oh you have the only copies that aren't available online because that's how peer reviewed studies work. Lmfao 😆

[@thepope2412]

@@Low-Fi-SCOTT Nah they're all freely avaliable online. Here's an abstract of a peer reviewed meta anaylsis that reviewed 24 rcts. You can find the study yourself ;) "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally."

[@y.tcensorsyou1964]

.

[@webaj3124]

112+ studies, 44 peer reviewed & 31 RCT's, 32 OCT's on 26K patients; finds large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, hospitalization, time to recovery & viral clearance

[@phajduk86]

@@Jaren15949 kzbin.info/www/bejne/h5TMmnmPf6-cgM0

[@webaj3124]

my post are deleting. I posted 4 or 5 times already

[@Jay-ho9io]

@@webaj3124 sure. It's just you. Everyone else's posts with websites or links are going through just fine, but the whole world's out to get *you.* KZbin or some other shadowy conspiracy is acting to prevent you, the solel truth bringer, from releasing your great insight upon them world. 🤔 Doesn't sound crazy at all.

[@webaj3124]

kzbin.info/door/5rJlf5jdr_I6qiozbQdx-g

[@Jay-ho9io]

@@webaj3124 That's a list of videos, not a list of papers. Do you have a list of full titles or DOIs for those papers?

[@khwang89466]

Thanks for staying objective and giving us references to the studies. Love your guys’ work!

[@healthcaretriage]

Thank you for watching! :) -Tiffany

[@thepope2412]

Hardly objective. What you see in this video is top grade cherry picking. Dozens of randomized control trials show positive effects, and he intentionally picked one that showed negative results.

[@AlexTorres-qv3hv]

@@healthcaretriagedidn't get it...that comment was metaphorical

[@khwang89466]

@@AlexTorres-qv3hv It wasn’t metaphorical. Also I think the term you mean is sarcastic, which I meant neither. I’m legit glad they looked at multiple studies and meta analyses as well as comparing in vitro to in vivo dosages. Hey if it worked then I’d be all for it and I wouldn’t have to keep watching people die at work. But like a year ago with hydroxy being touted as a wonder drug, it turned out that it was purely anecdotal and didn’t hold up to scientific scrutiny.

[@AlexTorres-qv3hv]

You can also check on a quasi scientific study at Mexico city involving 220,000 individuals if that not enough then this discussion is simply worthless...

[@griznation9942]

Can you make a video explaining where the funding to make your videos come from?

[@Iliashun]

Can you make a video explaining why he is wrong ?

[@robertwoodhouse406]

Disregard the 60 other studies and the fact that countries like Mexico, Brazil, Japan, and India are using it on a wide scale with success. There a still major studies going on that might meet the FDA standards to allow, but the delay tactics are working really well when helped with shills. Hope you got paid well for your part

[@VBU09]

Honestly go through the cochrane meta analysis and tess lawries and tell me their downgrades for biases is valid.

[@milomilo55]

The same Tess Lawrie who claims to have no conflicts of interest, but is afilliated with, is a leader of, BIRD (British Ivermectin Recommendation Development) Group?

[@xaviermagnate]

@@milomilo55 BWAM!!!!

[@savedonlybygrace4705]

I took the 1.87 version of ivermectin and it worked. I was leary because I heard of people overdosing so I only took 1 notch which is for a 50 lb horse.i took it 2x with 14 hours between each dose and it worked! I began feeling better 2 hrs after dose one.. now it's been 12 hours since dose 2 and I feel great.

[@gpwnedable]

Anecdote /= Evidence

[@TheRxNViper]

Update how you feeling now and did you take it cause you had covid or you got the jab

[@savedonlybygrace4705]

@@TheRxNViper I had covid symptoms, I refuse the jab. I feel great I have been outside playing with my kids and all.

[@TheRxNViper]

@@savedonlybygrace4705 appreciate the quick response and glad your well, i had got 1 jab not getting the 2nd one praying this will help me. the doctors I deal with definitely don’t know nothin or does any research just takes orders

[@savedonlybygrace4705]

@@TheRxNViper do you have covid?

[@fearingforamerica921]

What's sad is this. Who did the three trials you just mentioned. It will and has and "is" you around the world! Who do you get paid by? Did you profit from this video?

[@marinated5425]

The drug is a 3CL protease inhibitor. This means it prevents the virus from replicating. None of these studies demonstrate that. Killing the virus and stopping it from replicating aren't the same thing. Its meant to be used as a preventative and very early treatment. The earlier it's used the better. If it doesn't stop hospitalisation and emergency in anyone that means it was used too late. On top of that, instead of the dosage amount required to stop replication, they list the amount required to kill the virus which is ofcourse going to be a stupidly high amount since it's not able to do that under any normal circumstances. Following this logic, they should be telling everyone how drinking water is dangerous because you can drown if you drink too much, ignoring everything else. That's basically what's they've pulled here and I don't know how they sleep at night

[@normanspurgeon5324]

this fellow knows about ivermectin- good

[@y.martel842]

thank you

[@tonymontana3742]

You're doing a terrific job of goosestepping. Your bias is too great to ignore. No mention of Mexico City or India and their success with Ivermectin.

[@Paraselene_Tao]

Their success is a patently false narrative.

[@SineEyed]

@@Paraselene_Tao says you..

[@Paraselene_Tao]

@@SineEyed anything else?

[@SineEyed]

@@Paraselene_Tao um.... you do a lot of hand waving and not a lot of making an actual argument..

[@Paraselene_Tao]

@@SineEyed okay.

[@geoffericsson2457]

So why has it worked then?

[@xaviermagnate]

It hasn't people are deceived and or lying!

[@geoffericsson2457]

@@xaviermagnate a pro surfer just did it over Instagram and used it and tested negative...then you have Joe Rogan...

[@democraticjustice7285]

Ivermectin is super cheap and one of the safest medicines we have. It is used around the world. And yet now in North America you can’t get it for love or money? I don’t know what’s going on but something very strange about all this.

[@IVespidI]

But if you even ask about it YOU'RE the problem. What doctor would refuse to endorse something that is known to have no side effects and has been show to have even some benefits, while at the same time thoroughly embracing an experimental treatment that is known to have severe side effects for some people while providing benefits that can be achieved (or surpassed) by other means?

[@windyday8598]

oxford university will begin a study on the use of ivermectin for covid. hmmmm. what may have prompted that?

[@trentonx]

Probably india

[@johnathanbrandt3027]

The pressure from the public mostly, If this study proves that ivermectin does not help with covid, will you accept that?

[@Paraselene_Tao]

A loud minority of IVM cult members is what prompted it.

[@ResortDog]

JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB JAB or you are fired, cancelled or worse.