The Reverse Mang (

[@donaldstandring991]

Thank You!

[@thebaccaratfather]

You are welcome bud

[@PabloDorantes-x1v]

Hello, friend a question do these simple and reverse combined sequences give better results than the simple sequence?

[@thebaccaratfather]

I feel the reverse gives you a better chance. Check out mine and Brunsons new system though. It blows this one away kzbin.info/www/bejne/i2K5faqKd7GSfa8

[@PabloDorantes-x1v]

@@thebaccaratfather Hello again, thanks for the answer, I have other questions, do the strategies have to be used with a new deck or can they also be used when the deck takes several rounds? For example, I enter a table and it has already been around 30 or 40 rounds.

[@thebaccaratfather]

@@PabloDorantes-x1v you can jump in whenever. Only with my advanced counting do i recommend starting at the beginning.

[@pablodorantes9783]

Hello friend, your strategies are very good, it's just that it's a little hard for me to understand your explanation, but I don't know if you have a PDF manual or some writing where you explain how to apply the strategies, I'll keep watching your videos over and over again to see if I can understand well and put them into practice. Greetings

[@thebaccaratfather]

I have captions on for other languages. I did use a notepad but it did not show up in the video. Sorry

[@geekassets6479]

Ok, here is my two cents. I have been playing live and huge amount of simulated for about a month randomly playing one five result pattern after another. There are exactly 32 five result patterns. The only difference is that we take all free hands until we get to the start of the next five results. Doing this I won exactly 168 five patterns (14 sets per shoe) and lost 3 in Vegas two weeks ago. The biggest difference I have seen with your version and Mang's is that no one is waiting for the sequence to finish out like I was in Vegas. You certainly see more hands and get to profit faster. I am just not sure about the difference in using a limited number of sequences. When using the four result pattern there are 16 exact patterns. By using a five result pattern I dare the casino play the opposite 'death pattern' of which there is only one in 32. It does seem to me that the five pattern makes more sense from a math perspective. I am curious about your thoughts. I will also tell you that the five step grand martingale is a complete horror since it lost 57 on the death pattern! Using it on every sequence earned 20-25 units per shoe until death pattern took place. I use a ladder MM on all my other systems, either a -1/+1 or some variation. Until seeing you use it here I never really considered it for this type of system.

[@thebaccaratfather]

Yo, if you feel more of an advantage with 5 patterns go for it. Everyone should modify it to their liking. You can also let the sequence finish out if you like it. I was just showing a modified version from the original 16 that i feel will give people some wins

[@geekassets6479]

@@thebaccaratfather I was just looking for your thoughts since it is way harder to hit the death pattern with five since there are 32 possible patterns vs. 16.

[@thebaccaratfather]

@geekassets6479 i guess I have never really given it much thought since i usually count cards instead of playing patterns. So my advice on that probably would not be of much help.

[@sokhonsoklim9173]

Have u ever lost all 4 of yr chosen sequence?

[@thebaccaratfather]

I have yet to lose all 4 but I have only been testing it a short while

[@phaphocaohoang]

Lost all 4 hand happen as normally because no system perfect 😅😅😅

[@thebaccaratfather]

@phaphocaohoang sorry to hear bud. You can lose 4 in a row and still comeback though. I showed you that in the original video

[@sanjeebrayamjhi2262]

Just need a good bankroll or need something like good money management ....I lost four in a row...two times ..I martingle will not be good option...need some other money management system...