The Roulette Strategy That Turned The Tables And Beat The Casino

[@danjohnson8675]

Love to see this played live!

[@MichaelSaif]

I first read this book 40 years ago and then again a few years ago. I tested the system with tens of thousands of spins and it doesn't work. The many small losing sessions simply outweigh the big winning sessions no matter what you set your profit target.

[@davidboyd374]

I read this book 55 years ago and still got it .tried in casinos and.basicaly too hard..yep 13against the bank 🧐😵‍💫

[@jjarry]

Every system is a fail when using more money from your bank roll to up the bets. So by just using the profit you never lose much. Only ever betting $2 all time from you own money you know how many spins you have for a session. If lose on black it only $2 of you own money. If win bet $4 if win again bet $8 win again keep $2 then bet $14 then leave with $30 if lose start again at $2. 3 wins in a row job done.

[@brianmacleod4533]

A team of 6 players using the Fibonacci system on each of the 2:1 bets would work much better and much quicker especially if each were given a significant bankroll and a suitable cut off. If all 6 players had enough to play a 20 step Fibonacci, they’d basically be unstoppable. Even if 1 or 2 of the players happened to hit a 20+ spin losing streak, the other 4 should cover. If the table max comes into play before the 20th bet, each player could wait to see enough straight losses on their assigned bet to fit the 20th bet under the table max. Who wants to start a team? 19 spin bankroll would require a $10,945 bankroll with a $1 starting bet and each player could wait to see 2 losses before starting. Easy! Lol 😂

[@fabrizioformenti7649]

If the roulette (ball) has no memory, then why don't you bet 100 dollars on 30 reds in a row coming next? I'll bet at least one black will come out instead. Then we'll repeat the bet thousands of times. Let's see which one of us wins more often. The ball has no memory but global statistics and experience seem to suggest that two reds and then a black happens quite more frequently than 22 reds in a row. Maybe this is not the case, but waiting for two losses could even make sense, sometimes.

[@brianmacleod4533]

@@SixlineForever did you not notice the last part of my comment? Your sarcasm radar must be broken or you're just a dimwit pretending to be smart.

[@wellsimon5202]

Casino will always win

[@richardtoney2441]

who does your illustrations? very good, makes enjoyable to watch.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I do them Richard, with the help of some software, thanks for the feedback

[@MrBlabliblop]

@@CasinoMatchmakercould you please share the name of the software? They are really enjoyable!

[@jacobmalka371]

Thanks for the great explanation of a good system. I have played it several times both live and online. I have never won online but can claim several successful wins live.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Thanks Jacob. What was your take profit target when playing live?

[@jacobmalka371]

@@CasinoMatchmaker We were 2 players and the winning were close to $100 each time. But the losses were always more than that: I think that for the system to work well you must cover all even chances and not just the 1 or 2.

[@Quotestolearnfrom-jk2uh]

Basically if you start with 10 bucks and you lose immediately 2 times in a row you’re done for (with sequence 1234) nice explanation and I’m definitely gonna try it out, maybe a tip to also add some sections in you’re videos to make rewatching a certain part easy, I am also wondering if you would be interested in trying out systems that work for people who comments under a video (as long as their system still works) I got one for ya.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hello! Yes that's right, 2 losses in a row, and you'll have to start again. I will look at adding chapters to the videos so it's easier for people, thanks for the heads up. Also you can submit your strategies via the discord, that's the best place to find me

[@FUT-Franklin]

£20->£150 today... never played roulette until today. I'm more of a spins guy but im 100% hooked after the streak i went on 😂

[@davidboyd374]

I got the book 55 years ago tried in various Manchester casinos Too hard too long to do it. The normal labby...is bad enough ..just one large losing bet.. and it scares the shit out of you. And your gone.. Which is the case with all the betting systems i know about 😭😭. I even found that mini baccarat. Seems to have more longer runs on bank or player.. So i stopped playing roulette.. But unfortunately most systems want big bets. For small returns and then the big bet loses and all your time and money.....is lost. Maybe

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Your from Manchester UK? We should go play some time!

[@BarathKumar7913]

Where can i find the excel

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hello, in the discord

[@TheRouletteGrinder]

Will you do another live session with reverse laboucher?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Absolutely! But I doubt I'll hit a winning sequence

[@tothsoma5636]

​@@CasinoMatchmaker You played this system live on your channel already?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

@@tothsoma5636 Not played the reverse system yet

[@fredrickfrempong9183]

Me who didn't understand the entire show😢😢😢😢😢😂😂😂

[@ahuruglica]

Cause it's impossible to beat a game that has negative expected return, no matter the strategy.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Haha it's not an easy one !

[@TCAS818]

Me too 😂

[@joe_croupier]

Roulette is easy to predict outside bets, I’ve been doing it for decades

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Are you going to share your secret?

[@howarddavies7008]

Billy bull-s--t

[@b.b.2506]

there is no game strategy, you play against roulette computers, online as well as

[@FUT-Franklin]

Play against? The payout is the same regardless if your playing 'against' or with anyone

[@6991enoemos]

what about playing this on dozens because you'll have a higher chance of winning each spin you'll win shit loads

[@the_contrarian]

I am wondering about this too

[@arturomeza5925]

It is a 15 minute long advertisement....

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

For what? The book is free online