The Saha Equation & the Pressure above the Photosphere!

Real Physics Talk, Munich, Germany, 2019: Pierre-Marie Robitaille
• Real Physics Talk: Pie...
Reactions in the Chromosphere of the Sun!
• Reactions in the Chrom...
What Elements are in the Sun?
• What Elements are in t...
The Life Cycle of the Stars | Pierre-Marie Robitaille [OTF2017]
• The Life Cycle of the ...
Dr. P.M. Robitaille | OTF2019 | Revelations Through MRI
• Dr. P.M. Robitaille | ...
P.M. Robitaille, Forty Lines of Evidence for Condensed Matter - The Sun on Trial: Liquid Metallic Hydrogen as a Solar Building Block, Progr. Phys. 2013, 90-142. www.ptep-online...
P.-M. Robitaille, Liquid Metallic Hydrogen: A Building Block for the Liquid Sun, Progr. Phys., 2011, 3, 60-74.
www.ptep-online...
P.-M. Robitaille, The Liquid Metallic Hydrogen Model of the Sun and the Solar Atmosphere IV. On the Nature of the Chromosphere, Progr. Phys., 2013, 3, L15-L21. www.ptep-online...
A.R. Choudhuri, How the Saha ionization equation was discovered,
arxiv.org/ftp/...
M.H. Saha, LIII. Ionization in the solar chromosphere. Phil. Mag. Ser. 6, 1920, 40(238), 472-488. www.tandfonlin...
M.N. Saha, On a Physical Theory of Stellar Spectra, Proc. Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1921, 99(697): 135-153. royalsocietypu...
E.A. Milne, Obituary Notice of R. H. Fowler (1889-1944), Obituary Notices of the Fellows of the Royal Society, 1945, 5, 61-78.
www.jstor.org/...
R.H. Fowler and E.A. Milne, The intensities of absorption lines in the stellar spectra, and the temperatures and pressures in the reversing layers of stars, Monthly Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1923, 83, 403-424.
academic.oup.c...
Figures not to scale and used for visualization purposes only.
This channel is educational in nature.
Link to Dr. Robitaille’s papers on Vixra:
vixra.org/autho...
Outro Music:
Foria: Break Away
/ foria
• Foria - Break Away | M...

[@dorhinj23]

when your degree of error exceeds 10 orders of magnitude and you still receive laud and funding, you must be an astrophysicist ! out of this world, Doctor R. many thanks for your inspirational brain teasing, honest clarity of purpose

[@freelifetas1252]

Thanks Pierre. This one was a little over my head but that just means I have some homework to do 👍

[@jasonsharma5888]

@8:49 I love the chuckle with "well that's it for now" after drop a big fat exothermic bomb.

[@kimberleebrackley2793]

Always a pleasure Dr. Robitaille. I support your continued efforts to find real science in a sea of old beliefs. Be well and stay safe

[@charlesfarmer9474]

Thank you Dr R!

[@4n2earth22]

@8:49 PMR understates ("Well that is all for now"...) the enormous load of information just delivered that buries conventional science a few light-years deep in facts and steps back and leaves his audience reeling and glabber fasted, as usual. Pierre, you are a rock star in the science of reality. Please keep on keeping on with your awesome informative videos that dispel the myths that were foisted on tender young minds like mine some 50 years ago when I was in school {and apparently the 'main stream' is still at it}. Your are a force to be reckoned with, and I, for one of many, deeply appreciate the work you are doing to dispel the myths.

[@jasonsharma5888]

understated with a chuckle ;) well put: "buries conventional science a few light-years deep in facts"

[@ETALAL]

Thank you 🙏🌻

[@kimberleebrackley2793]

🤘

[@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT]

:-)

[@mapsofbeing5937]

Stellar work as always, thank you!

[@thefrustratedtheologian6238]

nice pun

[@johnnyliminal8032]

Oof.

[@ccoastrider]

Well... it's back to class for me!

[@LarsOfMars.]

These videos always so comprehensively explain the background and arguments for your ideas and concepte in such an informative, accessible and positive manner. I have been able to introduce a small handful of friends and colleagues to some of thr concepts touched on by EU/PC theory as result of some of the questions raised by your excellent presentations. Thank you for sharing your extremely compelling ideas with us so freely.

[@xkguy]

Wonderful. The more I watch your videos the more I am able to understand your objections to the current solar model.

[@medicalconnoisseur1308]

awesome video

[@bryangill8680]

Thank you!

[@YouTube_Satan]

Thank you for these awesome videos. 😎👍

[@raymondandroschuk7035]

Thank you for going these videos. It’s great to have these processes properly explained. 😀

[@fredfarquar7679]

Thank you again, Dr. Robitaille! I often picture you as a piano tuner and current astrophysics as a piano left in an unheated garage for decades; the basic structure is fine, but most of the other tuners are tone-deaf and think the cacophony that results when the piano is played is just perfect! 'Ears to hear', and all that! Keep us updated with these detailed videos!

[@DrFeltcher]

He has no data or any ground to stand on for any of his ideas. "Mainstream" science has millions of hours of research. Please stop listening to this man, he's wrong about everything. He doesn't even understand what he is trying to debunk

[@fredfarquar7679]

Andrew Caldwell Oh, you poor blind fool. I suppose MRI machines (which he developed when every "expert" just "knew" it was impossible, that it would fry people's brains and tissue) are just a fake, or a fluke, then?? You sound like those "experts", know-it-alls without a clue.

[@DrFeltcher]

@@fredfarquar7679 He didn't invent MRI machines my dude, he just made a few improvements to them. But let's say he did he did, so what? It doesn't give him the authority to comment on all the disciplines he does. You wouldn't let a brain surgeon give you a heart transplant would you? Especially if that brain surgeon went against the methods of almost every other heart surgeon. His ideas have no evidence and go against established Science.

[@fredfarquar7679]

Andrew Caldwell A) I am not 'your dude'. B) I did not say he invented them. Learn how to freaking read. The 'few improvements' he made to MRI machines made them viable as a medical diagnostic; without his work, MRI would only be a mostly useless scientific curiosity. C) Since I will not assume anything about you, what are YOUR credentials? Are they of such magnitude that you think you can disparage and denigrate Dr. Robitaille's theories and work, and make me believe you? It seems you are of the "if he doesn't have degrees in exactly the discipline he comments on, he has no right to make those comments and is to be ignored or trashed" crowd. Sad for you.

[@fredfarquar7679]

midlander4 Which, yet again, shows how little you know.

[@LandOfForeverSummer]

Thanks

[@thefrustratedtheologian6238]

Excellent video! It occurred to me while watching that proof of a solar atmosphere has been right in front of us, but called something else. When comets approach the sun we often observe them burning up "at altitude." This has been attributed to photon pressure. However, if the sun has a surface and an atmosphere, then moments burning up at altitude is similar to comets burning up in the earth's atmosphere.

[@barleyarrish]

@@davejones7632 The comet surfaces that have now been imaged show a rocky surface with many recognisable geological features. We do not appear to see much in the way of ice. the out gassing that is supposed to occur when the imagined 'volotiles' start to produce the cometary tail as the comet is heated by it's proximity to solar 'heating' occurs far to far from the Sun to be considered what is really going on. As these tails have been observed in deep space. I'm afraid that what you are seeing with comets is discharge phenomena. When theory meets direct observation, we find the usual posturing from surprised mainstream cosmologists. Which is very sad for science but understandable as careers and grants have to be protected.

[@thefrustratedtheologian6238]

@@davejones7632 Thank you for responding to my comment, though it was intended for a Scholar. As usual, the presence of your response suggests the comment was good and valid enough to "rattle your cage." By the way, when you reject "photon pressure" in favor of "heat," are you suggesting that heat is conveyed in some way other than photons? Are all the other frequencies of photons of no effect on the comets or meteors?

[@hobgoblinhollow4966]

I am glad science is exiting the realms of magic again. Transmutation is real, in stars

[@williamlong8859]

Simply because we may be able to define the process and how it works, makes it no less magic, nor any less the hand of God.

[@kenwatson2761]

some say soil as well, as above as below

[@johnnyliminal8032]

@@kenwatson2761 Dirty joke is noted. ~8O

[@davidmcguinness9187]

thanks

[@anthonywall5227]

Thank you

[@johnsmith-fr3sx]

Thank you for your efforts educating the public about the complex reality of this subject that is glossed over with ludicrous approximations by so-called experts. It seems any science where lab tests cannot be conducted on Earth is afflicted with speculation being passed off as deep theory. Your clear demonstration of the existence of the same solar surface in all wavelengths is already enough to debunk the current dogma.

[@johnlord8337]

The true Tension Constants or derivatives of the stellar engine must be accounted for in the electro-static (ES) and electric-gravitic (EG) model as there are mutiple tensions with the layers. As such, with the Aether particulate family of the graviton and electrino (and their associated graviton and electrico tensor bosino force carriers) each of these has its own tension. The electron tensor boson force carrier must also have its own tension. The photosphere containing the force carriers of the graviton, electrino, and electrons as the Photosphere Tension Constant (PTC) is the composite of these 3 forces. The electron, muon electron, and tau electron in the chromosphere have their own tensor boson force carrier tensions. The Chromosphere Tension Constant (CTC) must be the composite of these 3 forces. And there is more - With other correlations, there is new statements that the photino and photons as 0 integer bosons (also having EG forces, and a hidden mass with a neutron shell (making the photon appear as massless), one must also include the graviton photino bosino tension, electrino photino bosino tension ... and the electron boson tension in the PTC. This must then include the additional electron photon boson tension, muon electron photon boson tension, and the tau electron photon boson tension into the CTC. So Photosphere Tension Constant (PTC) = graviton boson force carrier tension and graviton photino bosino tension, electrino boson force carrier tension and electrino photino bosino tension, ... and electron boson force carrier tension and electron photon boson tension, The Chromosphere Tension Constant (CTC) = electron boson force carrier tension and electron photon boson tension, muon electron force carrier tension and muon electron photon boson tension, and the tau electron force carrier tension and tau electron photon boson tension. So when one really asks about the layman's word "pressure" (versus tension) within the photosphere, or the chromosphere, or the corona, one must have these Constants put into their answer.

[@mcburcke]

Keep 'em coming, Doc! You are almost single-handedly forcing astrophysics into the 21st century in terms of solar realities. You will be remembered for this!

[@Goalsplus]

Thank you. I look forward to seeing what new things can be discovered once others start using your lead. And what other ingrained falsehoods will be thrown away.

[@vtg100]

7:48 this bit says what I was saying earlier to a friend. Mind blowing to find it here. Great thanx

[@sdaniel9129]

You are very good!!!

[@allumshato3399]

Pierre, the material you present is very important and useful to us. Thank you for your efforts.

[@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT]

Thank you Dr. Robitaille! Another important argument!

[@jons2447]

Hello, Dr. Robitaille; Thank you for all you do, and specially for the "In Memoriam" plaque for Dr. Dowdye. [I think he had an unassuming and modest personality that is very refreshing.] I really appreciate the way you explain 'why' the accepted theory is incorrect. Then you give a reasonable theory that corrects the errors in the accepted theory. Plus you usually explain it in relatively simple terms that help others grasp the concepts. I sincerely say "Thank You!" for your kindness, generosity, wisdom as you help others. I was unaware of the idea that the sun supposedly has a low pressure atmosphere. To me it seems ridiculous since the sun's gravity is considered to be so great. BTW, that reminds me of a question I've had. Isn't it true that the earth is in the atmosphere of the sun because it is within the heliosphere? How does that relate to the solar wind? Could you perhaps comment on that in your next video? Thank you in advance if you decide to respond to my query. Have a GREAT day, Neighbor!

[@johnnyliminal8032]

Jon Steedley, nice comment Sir. I too really appreciate both Dr. R’s courage in poking holes in so-called settled science, and his presentation. Your question about Solar Wind and the Heliosphere got me thinking and imagining, thank you. ~8) I’d like to ask back to you, what do you know about these things (I am not saying I know them)? Like the density of the heliosphere out from the Sun (to here at least, but how that changes with distance). How does the density of SW compare, how do each interact with magnetic environment (including the induced magnetics produced by each of them). Now I remember Earth’s own orbiting ‘winds’, the radiation belts (Van Allen, iirc). How do those interact with the thin soup of charged particles and dust that float around? Can’t say they “don’t have a care in the world”, technically anyway lol. Cheers.

[@loboalamo]

Exothermic sun makes more sense actually and the thought that earth and other bodies in this solar system are in the sun's type of atmosphere, plasma has to have some kind of stasis. Now, back to the center of the universe. When someone gets our wheels turning🌞

[@DrFeltcher]

@@johnnyliminal8032He is so clueless. He has no data for any of his claims, and has yet to try to justify any of them

[@kyletomorug6780]

Awesome to stop by, and learn more here!

[@Nobody_114]

I have been watching your videos over the years and love them. Having had a PhD in EE from Carleton University in Ottawa, it is very disheartening that reasonable theories like your's about the Sun, or like Prof. Erik Verlinde about Gravity (who proves that there is no need for dark-matter that has not been found) are ignored and not recognized world-wide by the scientific community. It is a shame to science.

[@boohoo746]

@@davejones7632 do you have any factual arguments to make regarding the accuracy of the claims made in this video ? in the absence of such arguments, a well-developed nonsense detector should easily detect your empty claims as the substance of nonsense.

[@sonpopco-op9682]

@@davejones7632 Oh here we go its the Troll. More ad hominem, and straw man attacks. ..unsubscribe & just leave, no one is impressed.

[@Nobody_114]

@@davejones7632 If it was nonsense, I'm sure I wouldn't fall for it. Besides, if it was indeed nonsense, you wouldn't waste your precious intellectual time commenting on this video for the garbage you claim it is, would you?

[@Nobody_114]

@@davejones7632 Even at an undergraduate level understanding in quantum physics, you should know that nothing is "absolute" in physics, and each theory is always in transient to be overtaken by a better one. So your saying "that is obviously wrong" is obviously wrong! Dr. P.M. Robitaille has studied physics, most definitely more than me, and presents a logical and reasonable argument, so why don't you argue or oppose his view logically instead of going after his audience (like me)? Can't stand up to bully someone "your size"? I have done my research and won't waste my time replying to you or arguing with you because I have an excellent job and get paid very well for it to work! Who are you, anyways, to question my knowledge or understanding? Do you know me? Do you know my mind? What courses I have taken? How many years I have studied physics? How many degrees I have? Stop being a crackpot on the internet and go do some real research for whatever university pays you to waste your time replying to people on youtube. Good bye.

[@Nobody_114]

@@davejones7632 You don't even understand the simple concept of reasoning: you judge my knowledge based on your refuting on somebody else's theory! I mention quantum mechanics just to prove the point of evolving theories in physics. I know it has nothing to do with this topic, but that's besides the point!! If an GP indeed gives me a reasonable argument regarding electronics or electrical engineering, I will definitely listen to it and agree with him if his reasoning is correct. You show no reasoning in your arguments above besides just refuting Dr. Robitaille's qualifications, which, in the eyes of industry means nothing! (like you saying Tim Cook knows nothing about electronics). So you claim to know more about physics than me, huh? Ok, time to show your cards (or fold): what are your credentials? What university did you study in? Where do you teach? Where have you refuted Dr. Robitaille's theories? Where is your website / research? What is the web address of your published papers (like the ones Dr. Robitaille references)? Give me the list of papers you have published that refute Dr. Robitaille theories that are peer-reviewed and conference/journal accepted? What is your real name? See, it's easy to go around putting someone's theories down without stating facts. That's what you're doing above, and it's amazing how you have so much time to waste on youtube rather than focusing on your job (which should be teaching students - if you have any). Physicists like you refuted Einstein's theories for 10 years after he published them. You're singing the same song. I don't have time to waste on you. Show your cards or leave me alone to my own intelligent opinion! I never asked for your's!

[@eltonrobb6208]

I'm glad I took a look at this! Thanks Doctor!

[@barleyarrish]

@@davejones7632 perhaps you should outline your criticism, rather than saying nothing of consequence.

[@eltonrobb6208]

@@davejones7632 You get what you think about most of the time. Being glad to see a video like this keeps my vibration up.

[@eltonrobb6208]

@@davejones7632 Remember, you will attract into your life what you think about most of the time.

[@eltonrobb6208]

@@davejones7632 It's true. Your brain is a radio transceiver. It can send out vibrations and attract like vibrations.

[@maryjordan7957]

Oh, thank you!!!!! I always feel so much lighter after listening to the truth!!!!!!! God bless you!

[@ELITEMARKSMANTV]

@@davejones7632 agreed

[@adeeperbluegreen]

I would love to watch this on Rumble. KZbin shows me ads but I bet you never see a penny of it.

[@johnnyliminal8032]

Not to mention that at least some of us who bought those products are pissed right now. Complete junk.

[@erikemanuelsson3334]

thnx doc, we need you for the truth

[@ThomasistheTwin]

Thanks for all your videos disputing the standard model. Now can you make a series of videos stating how you believe the sun works.

[@jsbueno]

guess what: this series of video is what his youtube channel is all about. Just take a look.

[@ThomasistheTwin]

@@jsbueno I have never found a video of how Dr.Robitaille believes stars form or how energy is transferred from the core to the Corona. There are only videos of him saying it’s not by way of the standard model. There needs to be a series of videos explaining his model since he rejects the standard model and the electric sun model.

[@larshotari5112]

Thanks Maestro, You keep pulling the curtain back, How exciting!

[@EinarBordewich]

The pressure you are talking about is it the dynamic radiation and outward kinetic particle pressure from the sun or are you talking about static pressure? Like if you measured the pressure in the earth atmosphere inside a house where the wind and particles do not affect the measurement, and did likewise on the sun and measured pressure inside a open box. Is there any static pressure on the sun like on earth?

[@sibeguy]

As always I love your videos. Something that I’ve wondered about for neutron stars. Since neutrons have a half life of about 11 minutes I would imagine that as some of the neutrons at the surface would decay and either the proton or electron would escape. Over time the “neutron star” would evaporate. Thoughts?

[@nicosmind3]

Models based off assumptions are often as good as guesswork, and ultimately theyre as good as those assumptions. I wish that was emphasised more in science (and economics too)

[@billyoldman9209]

That's what I thought too, that physicists have learned their methodology from classical economists. Equilibrium everywhere, circular arguments, unfalsifiable claims: A dead stucco replica of the universe.

[@GlennSwart]

Very good but if you add transmutation of elements into the equation it changes everything in terms of what reactions are happening surely? The pressures involved the SAHA equation proposes are ludicrous.

[@FindLiberty]

It may be tricky to measure that perturbance in the Aether around the sun as evidenced by the refraction of light coming from distant stars.

[@johnnyliminal8032]

We must use Homer Simpson’s Solution, take those measurements at night.

[@FindLiberty]

@@johnnyliminal8032 LOL, no, just observe during an eclipse. Check. But when attempting physical travel to the sun, night is the best time to go...

[@FindLiberty]

I still can't seem to find my Aether Ubiquitous Background Pressure gauge; and it seems like I've already looked everywhere...

[@loboalamo]

But if we could, then we have part of an equation to apply in some formula for warp speed and how to measure it. Could it be possible, and survive it too? Do we need angelic bodies?

[@quietackshon]

To all the people who say that Pierre-Marie is not a physicist, he's not a cosmologist, he's not an astronomer, he's not X,Y,Z, so for these individuals, QED his theories and hypotheses can be dismissed. FYI to _all_ those who prefer their science served with authority by the high priests of "science", a beer-maker managed to get an SI unit named after himself, the units called the _Joule._

[@quietackshon]

@@midlander4 pfft! what's yours?

[@quietackshon]

@@midlander4 Can't you read and chew gum at the same time?

[@keepmoving1185]

Well done

[@michaelegan6092]

What a wonderful scientist and person. I'm not formally educated in these matters but have long held views that what we are being indoctrinated in is rubbish.

[@whgordon6109]

Absolutely Fascinating and Super Well Done! Many Thanks Doc.

[@captainsensible298]

GREAT video, care to poke some more holes in traditional solar physics, your last point about the suns mass being about 300 billion more than the earth generating massive pressures on the liquid lattice surface makes the gaseous plasma hypothesis rather defunct. How about some more discussion around the precipitation of the liquid from it's original dusty plasma state

[@MrBrelindm]

Won't the Parker Solar Probe be able to confirm plasma pressures in the Corona with the data it produces?

[@davestorm6718]

I presume it wouldn't really be able to do much in this regard - still way too far away even at it's closest of ~9 million miles from the surface (between 1/3rd to 1/4th of Mercury's orbit).

[@jsbueno]

even if it would, they don't want an official measurement orders of magnitude away from the accepted "truth" - they'd rather hide it and tell nothing about it.

[@todirbg]

@@jsbueno Don't be like that. This implies a conspiracy to hide the truth and this is not the case. I think most of the scientist are really honest people in honest search for the truth. No the data will not be hidden on purpose. It may be ignored or overlooked, but not hidden on purpose. There is a fact about the scientific data that humanity has - we have magnitudes more data than we can process and understand. Unfortunately Planck's principle is valid and will remain valid for time being so don't hold your breath on any ground braking shifts in the theory en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_principle

[@markmaehler1608]

metal hydrogen 1 does that give us more or less a 5bllion year run, give the grandchildren some hope, thank you Dr. Robitaille

[@kitsune2858]

And the question naturally asked is, when can I get a EVGA 3090? Hehe, JK :) Im from S0, and I don't understand 81.45% of your material, but I stand with you on principal alone!

[@johnnyliminal8032]

Honestly bro you are already overclocked, if you know your deficiencies to three significant digits. Am just 0bserving you Suspiciously. That’s cool, right? ~8D

[@kawasakimac8541]

Now you mentioned it, it seems obvious. But my new question then becomes: if an atmosphere, what of solar clouds?

[@j.douglassizemore792]

I could have used some diagrams to show the differences between Sana's incorrect posit and your cohorts' position.. These are often easier for a layman to understand Please keep up making these essential videos to steer MSS back on course. .

[@jeremystuartlee7278]

Beautiful science. Thank you sir.

[@DanishGSM]

Sir, Thanks so much.

[@multi_misa72]

Doc, another awesome video, thank you.

[@gsdalpha1358]

Fascinating! When I was in school (decades ago), we were taught the Sun was just a big ball of fire due to some sort of thermonuclear activity. You are an awesome teacher! Thank you, sir.

[@boohoo746]

"big ball of fire" is more accurate than modern scientific "hot gas" models

[@Deliquescentinsight]

I have always had an intuition that the sun is vastly misunderstood, and it seems so much of astrophysics is guesswork! Do you know of the great Arthur M Young Pierre, another brilliant man of science who is being buried by the establishment.

[@khwezimngoma]

This man is the reason why I still believe that its possible to do science nowadays.

[@billyoldman9209]

You might also enjoy Dissident Science from the CNPS then.

[@khwezimngoma]

@@billyoldman9209 Thank you, am on that channel :-) enjoy your day

[@blindjoshua_theblender]

Thanks! Love your work.

[@joeskis]

You should address the recent reports of new black hole pictures.

[@keithnorris6348]

I am learning! thanks for the info video.

[@weinerdog137]

Hi DOCTOR. Can you give us your opinion on BRILLIANT LIGHT POWER?

[@MrWarwolf6]

Another great video!

[@rikimitchell916]

How does your stellar model impact the mass of neutrinos?

[@MrSnackerchip]

I really wish I had paid attention in all math/physics classes...

[@MrSnackerchip]

@@midlander4 Could you put the equations in your reply? Thanks!

[@fleam101]

Fascinating.

[@TheWiseFool_]

Thank you Great video!

[@yaoooy]

Real science, love It.

[@yaoooy]

@@davejones7632 Watch the video

[@yaoooy]

@@davejones7632 sun cannot be Ideal gas since the temperatures and pressure in the sun make elements be in supercritical region , therefore compressibile supercritical fluids, for which pv^n = const and dh = cpdT are no longer valid. Go study some phisycs you clearly are lacking

[@yaoooy]

Lmao zero physics qualifications? Robitaille's paper have been cited by l'ora of other physicists in their studies , his solar model Is about to be a Major breaktrough in astronomy physics. You clearly didnt Watch ant of his videos

[@yaoooy]

@@davejones7632 nope , his sun model makes a lot more sense than the current shitty Ideal gas and plasma solar model. His model Will be a Major breaktrough

[@yaoooy]

The current solar model Is so bad that they Say that the sun has no surface. If there Is not surface you cannot define it's own pressure. Moreover no gas can self compress by it's own gravitational attraction, there Is no evidence of stars forming from nebulas

[@adamslijderink3306]

Thank you for real science discussion..

[@dsm5d723]

So lonely in the future. I am about to write the theoretical basis for ex-vitro computation. Growing a human (or any animal) organically with tech. If they try to code a simulation of C. Elegans, it won't work; it must be grown. Observer effect in the double slit experiment = Lyman Alpha line split. Angstroms to the brain, bro. My pet Tuatara has it covered. He closes his left and right eyes.

[@chrisbanbury]

Amazing.

[@andrewhagen899]

Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin is often given credit for discovering that the Sun is composed of mostly hydrogen and helium by "calculating the abundance of chemical elements from stellar spectra" following Saha. www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201501/physicshistory.cfm

[@Michael-vp4zt]

Do you have a video explaining what coronal hole are?

[@Dan-gs3kg]

Coronal holes appear over a region lacking sunspots, these regions emit sparse and fast solar plasmas. Over sunspots slower, denser, and brighter plasmas are emitted.

[@johnnyliminal8032]

@@smithguy9109 I know S0, but WW is new to me. Thanks for that pointer.

[@whoknows3814]

Sir Do you have a degree in any other field Than radiology? If so What are they and from where? I humbly await your response.

[@jamesbarber5410]

Are you suggesting that solar radiation isn’t a radiology based issue?

[@manuelmamann5035]

do astronomers have a degree is radiology?

[@michaeleupene5499]

How is this relevant?

[@manuelmamann5035]

@@michaeleupene5499 maybe the physics they use is diffrent haha.

[@jiminverness]

@@manuelmamann5035 It seems that most astronomers are blank-faced sheeple (case in point: the ready acceptance of the ridiculous and unworkable redefinition of "planet" by the IAU shenanigans in 2006 - I mean, really, defining a planet based on extrinsic rather than intrinsic characteristics? Geez).

[@ahnafhossain6726]

Sir Saha was from Bangladesh but on that time Bangladesh was not a separated country the whole Bangladesh Pakistan and India ware cald Indian continent. He was born in Bangladesh Dhaka. But due we was not separated the Bengal scientist now colled indian astrophysicist..........which is kind of sad for us that he is not recognized as Bengal astrophysicist

[@Alasdair-Morrison]

@Sky Scholar You Sir are a Legend! (👍 ͡❛ ͜ʖ ͡❛)👍

[@flyfin108]

@5.45 describes western science pretty accurate: even tho we got everything wrong we are still able to make new discoveries

[@kz6fittycent]

The 1 dislike is from "professor" Dave...

[@solarmicronovae]

#3🤓👍

[@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT]

:-)

[@jnhrtmn]

It is amazing how many trust, believe, and viscously defend what they were taught. I think rote memory trust in mathematics is to blame by making it a lazy and irresponsible thought process. When something is put to math, it is put on a pedestal and rarely second guessed. People need to see that math can give the right answers using non-causal variables. Blindly trusting math puts them in "The Allegory Of The Cave!"

[@dasdaleberger5683]

1966?

[@heberfrank8664]

A fair amount of this is over my two meter tall head. But I remain very convinced that the Sun is condensed matter just like it appears.

[@sunilcunningham3080]

I propose we get Dr PMR to head a team of satellite designers to send a new mission to measure the Sun close up, using the best and correct devices for the job. It seems NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer, so private over vested interests.

[@siecieh]

[@inspireme1194]

Hi Dr Robitaille, just recently come across your channel. Keep up the good fight! Not sure if you have come across Eric Lerner's stuff - check out "The Real Crisis in Cosmology" youtube series

[@PreppenWolfLLC]

How one can know at least about sunspots in 1920 and still try to use thermal equilibrium as a baseline assumption is beyond me.

[@markyishere1]

Not an astrophysicist, check. Not an astronomer, check. Not a physicist, chek. Not qualified to make videos on above subjects, check.

[@ResortDog]

Thanks. Buy AMC...

[@trexx32]

Sorry if it fails the 2nd law of thermodynamics it's just guessing

[@robertquick6690]

And it all comes back to massaging A. Edingtons deceased ego for the last century. Sad...

[@wvpatriot3077]

Bout to get magnetically reversed.

[@freddan6fly]

Wow, just wow, total ignorance. I've haven't seen anyone be more consistent wrong since I last watched a flat earther.

[@stevecrothers6585]

That you have time to watch flat earth videos demonstrates that you are not a scientist, just an ignoramus. In this video Dr. Robitaille has correctly explained that the Saha equation cannot be used to ascertain anything about the solar atmosphere. Because the solar atmosphere is not in thermal equilibrium you can errors with it up to a trillion fold, as the quotations from the book by Zirin highlight. Saha is assuming endothermic reactions in the chromosphere in order to generate his ions and free electrons, but the reactions in the chromosphere must be exothermic because light is being emitted. Go away and learn some chemistry before you make more of your vacuous comments.

[@rebeccajosteelman563]

Thank you!