The Secret of The Rape of Lucrece by William Shakespeare

[@TwoDogSay]

Surely, you wanted to say at 3:23 that there 'was NOT' another school ...

[@jayhallcarpenter2508]

Brilliant! How does it honor Marlow?

[@RobertBoog91355]

How does it honor Marlowe? Because Rape of Lucrece was written quickly. It went to the Stationer's Register on or about May 15, 1594. Marlowe had died one year previously on May 30, 1593.

[@stevenhershkowitz2265]

"The Rape of Lucrece" is an anagram of "Cure For Thee Clap"

[@RobertBoog91355]

More anagrams: "flee, procure, teach" or "care cheerful poet" or perhaps Latin: "Capet hereof lucre" (He takes profit hereof)

[@vetstadiumastroturf5756]

@@RobertBoog91355 "Cure for the clap" relates directly to the title "Rape of Lucrece" because it was thought that sexual intercourse was a cure for venereal disease. Your solutions are complete, but seem to be random. It's not enough to use all the letters - the solution has to make sense and relate to the subject at hand. Ex. The Rape of Lucrece = "Cruel R.E. chafe poet", which is far more specific to the poet, and reflects on the relationship between the poet and Queen Elizabeth. "Never Before Imprinted" does = Pour Beer, Die in Ferment, which does make sense, but does not relate to the subject, whereas "Be In Print For M. E De Vere" relates perfectly to the subject at hand, which is What name should go in the blank space on the front page.

[@taihastings3097]

Belief in Shaksper of Stratford as Shake-Spear cannot 'die', when millions of tourists bring in billions of ££££ into England..."they" would never allow it, but it is nice to appreciate the truth Veritas... In Veritas Vittoria

[@yewkiamakuahui2296]

Your reference to Donald Trump only sullied an otherwise good research paper and brought discredit to yourself.

[@RobertBoog91355]

Okay thanks for your opinion.

[@zantlozantlom4752]

I thought Elizabeth I called Jon Dee her eyes.

[@zantlozantlom4752]

I enjoyed the video! It had a lot of interesting bits of information. Your conclusion is but ONE of many that may be drawn from them. I suspect others may have had reasons besides de Vere to have published so quickly. I've been working on decrypting aliases of that period in history for the past two years. I have found that many people were not who we always believed. Of course, Shakespeare was NOT the author of the Shakespeare works. It's surprising anyone has ever believed that mask! I'm not planning to publish my findings, but a fellow researcher has a book due out soon that will talk about many of these aliases and masks. All of the history surrounding Elizabeth I, James VI/I, Charles I, and Charles II may have to be rewritten. Many of the artists, philosophers, astronomers, scientists... may also be changed. There were people, mostly behind the scenes, creating a different world entirely.

[@RobertBoog91355]

@@zantlozantlom4752 Thanks! i used three sources online and they were all consistent. Good question though: what was her nickname for John Dee?

[@zantlozantlom4752]

@@RobertBoog91355 His number was 007, and he did spy for England. The zeros were made into eyes. Once source claims she called him, "My philosopher." Have you come across the date he added Doctor before his name? It was not a school associated degree.

[@taihastings3097]

Do we really know Cecil wrote Narcissus? Could it not have been Oxford who was initially annoyed with Wriosely for not wanting to marry his daughter, before forgiving him and making it up to him? I see V&A as Oxford's warning to a younger courtier, his little "brother" from the Burghley household, not to allow himself to be ensnared by the glamour, glitz and dangerous power games of Elizabeth and her court. I really don't like the look or the sound of Dudley...a schemer. One last point.. the poet in the Sonnets addresses the young man with the second person familiar pronoun "thou". NO WAY would a Shaksper of Stratford have got away with addressing a noble in that way. Some latin countries still hold to those rules to this day.

[@betttrbeth]

I disagree with you about Trump but even if I agreed, it was really out of place.