The Semantic Learning Tree : Elon Musk's Secret to Learning Faster

[@-haclong2366]

This is also how wikis like Fandom work, people start with core information and others branch it out.

[@alexgimarc3276]

Persuasion suggestion for your consideration. When you describe other trees and people proposing them regardless of the completeness of those trees, please consider describing them as opening bids rather than final products (emphasis here is opening bids). You have the final product part down perfectly, but the opening bid notion could use more emphasis as it is the process / system from getting from here to there that is important. That would emphasize the evolutionary growth of the things over time. Cheers -

[@kaitlin8669]

Currently working on one to submit to you. :)

[@KartikGadaATOM]

I am sending all the encouragement in the world :).

[@Vimislearning-mk8dw]

Hi Kartik, I have been looking into this topic of learning recently as it really intrigued me. You seem to be one of the very few people who have actually expanded on Musks idea. I think this does a pretty good overall explanation and its nice you did it with Paleontology and World History but I still think the studying methods are missing. A video I found which I think you might appreciate is this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZWxopSweNGcr80 This also has a similar idea of semantic trees but in the form of layering - get the general idea and then more to the specifics. It also has ideas about mindmaps and connections so I believe it should really compliment your video

[@KartikGadaATOM]

Thanks. I am going to be releasing an Astronomy one soon (that I have had half-done sitting there for 18 months). Studying methods : Each person is different, so I can't really guide them via a video. It is more about topic prioritization to avoid getting stuck in the narrow twigs. Admittedly, this is for people who are already good at studying, and just need a fast-track path structured out. Hence, the 'Bachelor's Degree-Level Knowledge in 60 hours' possibility. I would hate to say that a Semantic Tree is most useful for 115+ IQ types, making this another avenue via which the smart get smarter, but the below-average folks get left behind, but that is often the case with all such high-tech tools.