The Shiller Cape PE Ratio and Investing Returns (S&P 500 data)

The Shiller PE ratio or the CAPE PE ratio (cyclically adjusted price to earnings ratio) that uses 10 year average earnings to calculate the price to earnings ratio. The Shiller PE ratio is used to smoothen short term impacts like recession and other earnings issues. For example, during the 2007/2009 great financial crisis, the PE ratio went above 100 due to low earnings but the CAPE ratio went down to indicate the cheapness of the market. Low Shiller PE ratio leads to higher returns and a high usually leads to lower returns. We show regression analyses to confirm the thesis.
My passion is to look for low risk high reward investment opportunities. I apply my accounting skills and investing experience in order to find interesting investment ideas that offer the possibility to lead me towards my financial goals.
If you are a sophisticated investor looking for in depth, independent stock analyses and investing ideas, here is my STOCK MARKET RESEARCH PLATFORM (business and sector risk and reward analysis, my portfolios):
STOCK MARKET RESEARCH PLATFORM:
sven-carlin-research-platform...
Are you an investor that is just starting? Sign up for the FREE Stock Market Investing Course - a comprehensive guide to investing discussing all that matters: sven-carlin-research-platform...
I am also a book author:
Modern Value Investing book:
amzn.to/2lvfH3t
The below links are from third parties or channel sponsors where I get a fee from:
SeekingAlpha Offer: seekingalpha.me/SvenCarlin
I often get asked about brokers, here is a low fee broker, an international one that allows you to buy on global markets, and also offers complex solutions like options for when your investing skills grow. For now, it is one of the best solutions I have found for global investors, also based on your comments and inputs:
www.interactivebrokers.ie/mkt...

[@luigigetsu]

I can see that Sven invested in a new hairstyle, huge returns expected!

[@Value-Investing]

:-))))))

[@DK-qf6pr]

Looks 15 years younger

[@Synchrothron]

Nice haircut, Sven

[@Value-Investing]

Thanks! 😃

[@TheRobbeGee]

You should also look at the Shiller Excess P/E ratio. It’s the Shiller P/E’s yield, and subtracting the 10-year yield adjusted for inflation. Periods of overvaluation flare up quite well using this ratio

[@Value-Investing]

thanks for sharing!

[@williamhanlon9479]

Glad you liked the graphs. It's so cool to see this video as a long time viewer thanks for your analysis 🤠

[@Value-Investing]

Thank you:-) Really nice graphs and I enjoyed the process. Any other ideas, just send them over :-))) THANKS!!!!

[@sheanathan3566]

Great job, William

[@phildurre9492]

I would add here that inflation according to government is most likely underestimated, resulting in a higher current inflation adjusted shiller PE than real.

[@Value-Investing]

good point!

[@andrejvangelski4514]

Love the haircut! Thanks for another great video! :)

[@Value-Investing]

Thank you!! 😊

[@DevinSmith1486]

ty for the video. I've been trying to tell people about this

[@Value-Investing]

thanks

[@johnmcquaid7524]

Valuable message.. thank-you!

[@Value-Investing]

Glad you think so!

[@happya8199]

Feels like I'm back in stats class 😄. Thanks sven

[@Value-Investing]

Welcome back!

[@khodroulleik1885]

Excellent piece!

[@Value-Investing]

Many thanks!

[@bobbobertson7568]

Another masterpiece

[@Value-Investing]

thanks!

[@dredoctor8271]

I've said it earlier, I want a live class from you where I can ask live questions and there is interaction with the class + teacher. R^2 is great when its 0.90, having 4 dots with 500% is nice but that is just luck. 100 dots at 20 too 400% is concerning and that seems still be like betting on high returns over 15 years. While I thought 15 years is pretty safe to have accumulated nice returns. Maby 20% return is nice to settle on and I only have higher hopes on becoming a trillionair, instead of having a comfortable and realistic %return.

[@Value-Investing]

that is the problem with academia and real investing. BUffett always said he just wants to be vaguely right, not precisely wrong. To get a Ph.D. you try to do precision but you end up wrong anyway... trust me, I do have a wrong Ph.D :-)))

[@xaidas9945]

It is quite obvious that the stock market is pricey. The question is what are the alternatives? If Chinese themselves are not excited about their stock market, probably they know it better. Of course, I could make a risky contrarian bet on China with 25% portfolio, but what do I do with the rest? Pick some value traps? I think bonds or cash are even more risky than stocks in the long term, and it is likely the stock market is highly priced, because it predicts accelaration of money devaluation.

[@Value-Investing]

Chinese are gamblers and don't know better :-)) What are the alternatives - well, bonds, and looking for pockets of value in Europe for example... Tomorrow a stock...

[@xaidas9945]

@@Value-Investing cool. looking forward to the next video

[@thetjt]

I don't think cash is ever risky. What is imo very very risky is having like 95% of your wealth in stocks like the talking heads want you to believe. Maybe that's ok if you're young or we're not talking about large sums of money being invested. I'd definitely buy some bond funds though (and I have)... when the rates come down, they go up. Unless you're afraid of resurgent inflation. If that happens then money is king, to buy even cheaper bonds & stocks.

[@MattM-oe6qs]

​@@Value-InvestingWhat do you mean by your sentence that Chinese are gamblers? I follow your channel but I think I misunderstood this comment. You mean that any investment in China is pure gambling? That's kind of contrary to your normal outlook isn't it? Maybe just rephrase that sentence if you don't mind.

[@antonionanni5893]

I'd love to see this analysis on the single stocks within the S&P 500 (and more). Certainly, you would gain statistical robustness with a larger N

[@Value-Investing]

but then we have to adjust for business developments over time, M&A etc... impossible to work it out...

[@jus-tinkin]

Hair looking good Sven.

[@Value-Investing]

thanks!

[@christophkral191]

I'm using a quant modell to indentify cheap stocks. JDI Peet's from the Netherlands looks very attractive. What do you think?

[@Value-Investing]

have to check it again, thanks!

[@DevinSmith1486]

Also can you send the best fit curve equation for those 10 and 15 year graphs?

[@Value-Investing]

I don't have that

[@DevinSmith1486]

@@Value-Investing lol

[@maxjames00077]

Do you mind sharing with us how much percent you feel comfortable with holding in Chinese Stocks of your portfolio?

[@Value-Investing]

40% at the moment

[@maxjames00077]

@@Value-Investing oh damn! Wish I had the guts to do that. I'm in 10%

[@thetjt]

@@Value-Investing I'm impressed. You actually do what you preach. I have 33% China... although 8 points of that is EM Asia. May need some patience and belief to hold on long enough for sentiment to turn. How do you feel about Japan at this stage of momentum? ...Maybe a decent idea for next vid...

[@darrenmcinerney2212]

Hi I am happy to just DCA into the SNP consistently at the highs and the lows . I don't try to time the market to get in and out and i don't pick individual stocks . I like to keep things very simple, very little thinking involved. I know I will do very well doing this over a 30 to 40 year period. As long as your tough enough to stay the course and not sell when markets are crashing and just buy more at discounted prices. I know I will do just fine if i just do this and that's good enough for me .

[@Value-Investing]

THAT IS THE KEY, AS YOU SAY: "at the highs and the lows". If you do that, no worries, but most people chase the highs instead of the lows and then cry when it doesn't go up.

[@darrenmcinerney2212]

I agree 👍.

[@adham7912]

Thank you very much for this great video. Do you consider the election of Trump a risk for chinese stocks as it was in 2018/2019?!

[@Value-Investing]

from a US perspective maybe, for me in Europe, don't care...

[@kth6736]

​@@Value-Investing they meant sentiment and even earnings worsening even further.

[@AnyangU]

Good info. I don't know what information you are willing to share here but what other markets besides China look under-valued? As always, thanks!

[@Value-Investing]

there are telcos in Europe, but that is not easy

[@AnyangU]

@@Value-Investing Thanks!

[@SpazzaGB]

Schiller cape ratio is a good indicator for stable companies, but it doesn’t make sense for growing companies. What is the sense to average earning of Nvidia for the last 10 years? Forward P\E is much more appropriate to make this type of analysis

[@Value-Investing]

alright, but this is for index investing, not NVIDIA

[@SpazzaGB]

@@Value-Investing ​​⁠Nvidia is only an example, magnificent 7 are tech growing companies and averaging their earnings for the last 10 years do not make sense either. You can apply Shiller to companies like British American tobacco, Mc Donald’s or other slow growing

[@evarlast]

I wonder what CAPE PE ratio looks like for mid-cap or small-cap indexes.

[@Value-Investing]

I didn't check the data, but I assume it follows because when I checked small caps or midcaps those were expensive!

[@raintheinsane]

Can you do Shiller / Cape for chinese stocks? ​@@Value-Investing

[@hman2912]

I've heard people argue against shiller pe because it's backwards looking, and markets are forward looking

[@FlemetAeton]

The same people often argue that previous earnings reports don’t matter, DCF models do. One actually exists and the other is, at best, an educated guess.

[@Value-Investing]

the past is not so far away from the future, but the future often is far away from reality

[@chrissprague4025]

What is your thoughts on AGI effects on employment and real estate investing?

[@Value-Investing]

time will tell

[@BarsonlineOrg2013]

How about combining Shiller PE with VIX.....R sq. should be above 0.5 with only these two factors.....

[@Value-Investing]

that is a good addition ;-)

[@potomacXX]

Current environment is hard for discussions on valuation. As you have discussed multiple times, the value of currency is very likely to collapse significantly in a coming decade and these thing have a hierarchy in high inflation environment. Long term bonds < short term bonds / cash < stocks < "real assets" < gold(/BTC), the more the inflation the more the value is destroyed and always more in the left side. BTC and gold are both at all time high now btw. My guess is that those markets are sniffing something.

[@Value-Investing]

thanks for sharing!

[@Theo_Sot_9360]

What abiut STOXX 600 CAPE now @Sven Carlin?

[@Value-Investing]

don't know the date :-(

[@Kirmo13]

With the +30% over the last year in the S&P, and the crazy high PE ratios, I have no idea what to think

[@Value-Investing]

don't think about that, think about the fundamentals and where you can find them!

[@user-qn8ts3qt9n]

Hi Sven, why brazil markets are so low. For ex : ewz

[@Value-Investing]

often there is has to do with currency and politics.

[@mbg9650]

In a top stock market usually rimes with a lot of IPO's. Not there yet.

[@Value-Investing]

that bubble burst in 2021, now money is a bit more careful with new things

[@theodoroseidler7072]

Surprisingly, you can find it in China/HK.

[@Value-Investing]

:-)

[@RakanXYZ]

Interesting... I think treating the linear regression data as a barometer for who the deck is in favor of. Basically if you are following Edward Thorpes approach, when the deck is stacked against you (slightly unfavourable) then reduce your bet size and be more in cash. If its in favor, place bigger bets and if it's completely against you, just walk away or stay in cash. Since no one metric can ever explain the relationship between returns. 40 percent is very good but it would be hard to stay out of the market completely, as long term value investors will atest to. As for China, on paper it's great, part of the reason it's so low is the Xi Jinping effect and how do you go about valuing all public companies and state control effect?

[@surajsajeev1988]

HDFC bank. Indias top bank. Trading at historic low PE ratio.

[@Value-Investing]

banks always seem cheap kzbin.info/www/bejne/e37LoHZ7jriUbNE

[@MN-wg8qd]

Comparing the historical CAPE average to the current is kind of apples to oranges. Accounting rules have changed, we've had low interest environments, and 401ks are a relatively new instrument where pensions were used in the past more, trading is cheaper and easier, etc. I'm a little pessimistic about the next 10 years, but am not overly negative. If you think about it, if we have a bad decade then this 20 year period will be one of the worst ever given the 2000s were flat. I think the Magnificent 7 are overvalued (how much idk), but the rest of the market is not.

[@finalmatrix]

We are approaching Nov, 2021 valuation. SP500 may peak with another 30% upside or so and Nasdaq another 40% ? It seems bear market is coming in 1 to 2 years. I estimate market crash around end of 2025 judging the margin data is still slightly below exponential trendline.

[@Value-Investing]

time will tell

[@mihaib6235]

That hairstyle tho

[@Value-Investing]

:-)

[@user-im7zo4he6t]

Lmao when you said dead person

[@Value-Investing]

:-)

[@FrenShaped]

Nominal return is all that matters. let's say Shiller earning yield is only 3% but inflation boosted yield is 8%. you still need to invest or lose 5% wealth to inflation

[@Value-Investing]

Thanks for sharing!

[@stex83]

at the moment it seems that people dont care about these parameters though. My fear is that they will keep buying even with weak fundamentals.

[@Value-Investing]

that is correct, with the devaluation of money, it might not be a bad investment at all

[@dragos-andreidascalu4566]

1st

[@Value-Investing]

yes you are, thanks!

[@Neddie2k]

Solution dollar cost average.

[@Value-Investing]

only if done through thin...

[@mjs28s]

Less you are indexing, who cares? There are always great stocks that are undervalued in any "market"

[@Value-Investing]

that is absolutely correct!

[@jsedge2473]

China will never have equity ownership even close to the US, for one, because you don't "own" Chinese equities. Not even a Chinese citizen owns the equity let alone an American or European. They are literally communist, how could one (especially a foreigner) "own" equity in a communist state owned asset, on top of which is the Wests #1 adversary which we switch between playing nice or sanctioning and banning each other year to year... I've thought about it but it is too risky. To me that's just musical chairs of who gets their assets seized first by the CCP. Their stocks are so cheap but for a reason, sure you can gamble and catch a 2 or 3x but it's not like the US market is lacking gambling opportunities either.. And even though the US has uncountable amounts of problems, you can at least rest assured your assets wont get seized if the powers that be feel scared on a particular day.

[@Value-Investing]

fair point, thanks for sharing!

[@gioblack4689]

You will never gain

[@cookiejar01]

China is uninvestable. The political risk is too high, the chance of your investment going to 0 is quite high, like it was with Russia. That's not value investing, it's gambling. You're just taking a gamble on the political risk instead of the stock price.

[@pongop]

"Value investor discusses the potential of 'uninvestable' stocks": kzbin.info/www/bejne/hIXHoGSKecyaqK8

[@thetjt]

Nonsense. China has been the same for past decades and stocks have been soaring. One shouln't swallow the US propaganda line hook and sinker...

[@Value-Investing]

thanks for sharing!

[@mbg9650]

The problem with China stocks is the country dictatorship and how foreign investors are considered. For instance, will they ever receive a dividend from being a shareholder? If no, it's the greather fool game.

[@Value-Investing]

thanks for sharing

[@javiervazquez9591]

You look like a Playboy now Sven..

[@Value-Investing]

:-)

[@simonefiaschi9076]

Te di finanza 🫣 con i minatori d oro ho fatto il cinquanta percento in quindici giorni fatti all ippica

[@Value-Investing]

guarde, questo e VALUE INVESTING FOR THE LONG TERM, se tu vieni qua a lodarti dell 50% in 2 settimane, mi sa che sei tu nel posto sbagliato!

[@simonefiaschi9076]

@@Value-Investing no io non mi lodo di niente ,come si fa a dire che i minatori non faranno gain quando l oro e’ a quella cifra e si prospetta un taglio dei tassi , faranno dieci volte i guadagni dell oro i piccoli Miners , proprio perché’ fai value Investing si vede lontano un miglio che i Miners sono regalati poi boh fai te

[@simonefiaschi9076]

@@Value-Investing con questo niente di personale