-Stands in the middle of an open field -Gets sniped -Complains of bias
@user-lh9tk4lp8l10 ай бұрын
>Knows Bo's panzer is lying in wait >Doesn't use recon, smoke, artillery or AT support >Whines when his tanks keep getting blown up and claims it's German bias At this point it's not even bias, it's just a MAJOR skill issue.
@shadowwolf260810 ай бұрын
Yeah it is kind of boring to watch not because Bo's winning but because there is LITERALLY no threat from the opposing player, kind of like a few of the recent HOI4 videos where the opposing team seems to be able to do nothing meaningful.
@therealzach.b10 ай бұрын
Chill he's taking notes from Russian offensive doctrine bro
@charliebasar906810 ай бұрын
To be fair it is kinda stupid that a tank with one crewman can reload faster and effectively fight fully crewed fresh tanks.
@XMysticHerox10 ай бұрын
I mean the one guy reload does show the bias of the game. Always has been kinda present in Men of War titles. Sometimes more sometimes less.
@tzeentchnianexaltedsorcero204110 ай бұрын
In several instances, the sherman is the one who shoots first, only to miss weirdly and got destroyed
@baconhairbacana196410 ай бұрын
3:30 "We need to check their posting history in 4chan" lmao i love Braun
@desichalkos562710 ай бұрын
Shows what he knows about 4chan lol
@delrunplays290310 ай бұрын
@@desichalkos5627 Isn't 4chan where the Nazis are (well, there and Gab)? Or do I have it backwards and it's the Stalin-bois on 4chan? Or do I have it completely wrong, and it's neither?
@sheeplord497610 ай бұрын
4chan is just an image board. There are nazis, commies, etc on there, but it leans towards the former more. Haven't looked at gab enough to comment on it.
@sheeplord497610 ай бұрын
4chan is just an image board. There are nazis, commies, etc on there, but it leans towards the former more. Haven't looked at gab enough to comment on it.
@desichalkos562710 ай бұрын
@@delrunplays2903 You misunderstand. 4chan is an anonymous image board with no accounts. There is no "post history" on 4chan.
@Swagman1210 ай бұрын
7:22 >shoots angled tank wth apcr round >gets mad it got deflected
@andrew_wow689210 ай бұрын
"The Sherman is a death trap!" Meanwhile average russian tank: has a reverse ignition, so if a dead tankman sets its foot of off pedal, the tank accelarates to crash into enemy positions
@dwarow250810 ай бұрын
Not sure where you took this bs from but a reverse ignition is not the same as a reverse clutch. Also having superior armor and a lower profile ads more value to surviveability than having more space lmfao. Please look at the tank surviveability onion next time before spreading freeahboo cope ;)
@Rumpelpumpel310 ай бұрын
@@dwarow2508 Didnt the Sherman have one of the highest crew survival rates while T-34 being shit? Not sure anyone is coping but you
@issober011010 ай бұрын
@@dwarow2508 how many T-34s were produced and how many of them survived the war? And no, the superior armor myth is so stupid, doesnt help that you have sloped armor when your crew can barely see, move and operate without getting exhausted in a short amount of time. Secondly the quality of the armor was absolute dogshit so even the 37mm pak gun was able to kill the crew without fully penetrating the fucking tank.
@stormtemplar9710 ай бұрын
@@Rumpelpumpel3they did. They had good armor, burned about a normal amount until wet stowage made them incredibly good, and most importantly had excellent ergonomics making it very easy to bail out.
@Pixilated10 ай бұрын
@@dwarow2508 the m4 literally has more effective thickness on its front plate, what are you talking about.
@brandonsanders269410 ай бұрын
That one guy was a vet 8 that massively increases their skills in all there baseline skills like tank loading and accuracy that’s why he reloaded quicker be a standard just spawned M10 tank destroyer.
@abercrombieblovs204210 ай бұрын
Ayyy more Gates of Hell content! I think you're one of the only KZbinrs who does videos like this on Gates of Hell
@andrew_wow689210 ай бұрын
Company of Heroes Shermans: 😊 Men of War Shermans: 💀
@Predator2035710 ай бұрын
Tank users when an anti-tank cannon in a defensive position does its job against tanks out in the open: "Oh my goodness! So much Bias!" Edit: Also, I'm pretty sure that Men of War is far from an accurate depiction unless you believe that generals can just possess soldiers or entire tank crews out of the blue.
@stillcantbesilencedevennow10 ай бұрын
Boi, I bet Chesty and MacArthur woulda LOVED that.
@Predator2035710 ай бұрын
@@stillcantbesilencedevennow The Chinese wouldn't have been ready for MacArthur's Korea Gaming levels of Micromanaging skills
@ikat_tracer10 ай бұрын
As somebody who is seasoned enough in Gates of Hell I will break a few things down to maybe improve someones gameplay, a lot of things in this video came down to a lack of gamesense: 0:20 - It was already dead, you can notice by it burning, burning vehicles will not take any further damage because they are already considered broken. 1:00 - Guns in manual control will favor the upper half of the reticle when shooting, resulting in more shells going over than under, unless when there is terrain in the way, RNG will gravitate more towards the thing that is closest to the vehicle (crude explanation but good enough) 1:17 - The "up armored" sherman only features an additional armor plate welded onto the right cheek of the turret 2:30 - crew switch is instant, at the point of the kill the crewman was at veteran 6, buffing the reload ability 3:00 - what can I say, bad micro, he inted the 3rd or 4th tank into a spot where he knew a panzer 4 with a high powered gun was literally waiting for vehicles to come and shoot, should have scouted ahead with infantry and drove up there with manual control already enabled, there is only 1 crewmember in the Panzer 4, something that would be very easy to exploit 4:49 - open side, not immediately retreating, not deploying smoke, he basically accepted it at this point, he didn't even try, he might not have gotten out, but every shot you don't take is a miss, he appearantly knew that another HIGH POWERED panzer 4 was coming, so rotate the armor and greet it with an AP shell, open sides like that make me feel uneasy but that may be my reflex talking 5:23 - a pointless waste of resources at that point, a bazooka can one shot a Panzer IV, considering how Bo keeps pushing with his tank without much infantry support it would be pretty easy to pick it out of the fight with a bazooka, it's also way cheaper than an anti tank gun that's not gonna punch through the front of a Panzer 4 anyways 5:57 - you keep shooting until it stops moving (or glowing red on the map) until then you can assume it alive 6:08 - M10 to the side go brrrrr 6:24 - should have switched to AP after the first shot, would have been a guaranteed kill, HE is only good against open tops and VERY lightly armored vehicles, the Sd.Kfz. 231 is not one of either 6:37 - the sherman is too far up front without infantry support, a Panzerschreck is gonna punch right through it and disable it, being this close up front is only good temporarily and should be followed by a quick retreat or infantry pushing up 6:47 - well, be aware of your surroundings, stuff like this can happen but a defense in depth strategy with tanks is not really a good idea, he should have pushed up to regain control 7:14 - it's not, you just need to aim and wait for the reticle to get smaller, you don't need much accuracy with 300mm rockets 7:50 - yes 7:54 - doesn't matter 8:05 - that's where the front and side meet actually, it's an intermediate plate and at that angle I would expect it to bounce, 2nd shot was into the lower side which of course went through and right into the ammo
@Bokoen110 ай бұрын
Not going through all the facts, but the first one is wrong lmao. You can see on the minimap if a vehicle is still recoverable and the vehicle is still on the map.
@ulfenburg753910 ай бұрын
@@Bokoen1 no u
@sarg389310 ай бұрын
@@Bokoen1If a vehicle’s engine is on fire, it’s either already broken or going to burn. This is why you learn to fear the Molotov cocktail.
@vilemzadrobilek58310 ай бұрын
@@Bokoen1Once fire gets started its over, no matter what will minimap say.
@42ndmechbattalion4410 ай бұрын
Is there an explanation for hetzer bouncing an su 122 on the side btw?
@LostGuardsman10 ай бұрын
Uses a rocket launcher to clear a trench line. "Ah Yes! The American way of battle"
@johnsheehy238910 ай бұрын
Bo's cooking with Sherman(s) like it's Atlanta
@damoclesecoe718410 ай бұрын
Greatest southern bbq.
@mrwri10 ай бұрын
Bo I don't want to pity farm so I'll just say I really enjoy your content when I've had a bad day, thanks for making it.
@HistoryNerd876510 ай бұрын
Hang in there, bud 🙂
@HornetMain10 ай бұрын
German bias in MY WW2 game? Naaaaaaaaaaaaa!
@kryzzan703910 ай бұрын
Bo never fails to fill us with his hot creamy delicious content! 🥰
@Daniel-sj2hq10 ай бұрын
Least fruity bokoen fan
@baconhairbacana196410 ай бұрын
Bo never fails to fill up my cheeks
@patrickcringe10 ай бұрын
oh god not the npc comments please god no
@mothchrist868310 ай бұрын
Noooo can't belive those comments made it to this channel
@Goated_Eminem10 ай бұрын
Sus
@TheArbiter132210 ай бұрын
Remember kids; only early run Sherman’s had a reputation as a death trap, Mid/late war Sherman crews had one of the highest survival rates for tank bailouts of WW2
@AHappyCub10 ай бұрын
They're not even a "death trap" in the first place compared to other tanks of it's time
@synthfur0510 ай бұрын
Maybe because they were massivly used mostly in end of war, when most german troops were located on east?
@johnclay271610 ай бұрын
" highest survival rates " Maybe because the entire Germany army was already on the downturn and the Americans barely had an enemy to fight because 85% of the Wehrmacht was laying in the ground in Russia and Ukraine
@AHappyCub10 ай бұрын
@@johnclay2716 Brother, it was a fact that the Sherman have the highest crew survivability rates in WW2 if you exclude the Churchill, which is the ACTUAL highest, and amongst the Sherman casualties, the Brits got the highest because their crew wear berets instead of helmets
@HistoryNerd876510 ай бұрын
@@johnclay2716Cope, Wehraboo.
@lonk918310 ай бұрын
It’s a beautiful day when we get another Braun rage video. I hope he had to edit this
@billwilson784110 ай бұрын
>Video Starts >Tank blows up, no commentary kek
@elitely674810 ай бұрын
Good to be early for a new Bokoen and the boys video. The awesome wins and terrible fails are hilarious! At least they can make some burgers, hotdogs and smores when the tanks become a grill!
@dennishogan569610 ай бұрын
Thanks for the arrow pointing in the thumb nail. I wouldn’t have guessed the Sherman 😂😂
@spamuraigranatabru114910 ай бұрын
I'm seeing a lot of Shermans not equipped with the wet racks, unless it has the wet racks its ammunitions like any other vehicle of the time.
@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi10 ай бұрын
The one german dude in the tank being Michael Wittmann himself breakdancing in the tank to cover all positions at the same time at maximum effectiveness
@MajorSkrewup10 ай бұрын
all while using signal flags for the others
@Joey_Freshwater10 ай бұрын
Gamers when a German tank cooks off three Shermans in a row: "Why does this game have a Germany bias?" Germans irl when they cook off three Shermans in a row but there's seven more behind them: "Why does this game have an American bias?"
@GoldenKast10 ай бұрын
Ctrl+c Ctrl+v
@SpicyFiur10 ай бұрын
The one PzIV got a very high Veteran Status. One Guy is enough to crew it.
"Holy shit, how many Shermans are you going to bring???" - The reaction to the actual American tank strategy.
@shadowninja80115 күн бұрын
the wildest thing is how easy the shermans ammo rack cooks off considering... if thye are modeled properly... they should be the hardest because the americans used a wet stowage ammo rack to help prevent that exact issue
@ryleeculla557010 ай бұрын
The best tank of the war momment or at least the more forgotten one 0:07
@TerrorMango9 ай бұрын
Damn the Sherman skill issue... "I know there's a German tank there, let me just keep driving into it so I guarantee it gets the first shot off."
@wojciechkomar19710 ай бұрын
I remember in mowas2 they were pretty reliable against all medium and even some heavy German tanks, once I even knocked out tiger with Sherman in editor
@ronsu2499 ай бұрын
My sherman still operating after the cook off
@ssoto376710 ай бұрын
Babe wake up, Bokoen uploaded Gates of Hell
@IDOLA14910 ай бұрын
Braun needs to check his diet as he is overdosing on sodium
@damio686510 ай бұрын
These dollar store 88s are not bussin
@Potato_Tactics10 ай бұрын
Choking is not wrong the AI on gates of hell is dogshit compared to MOW2, Ive noticed that the ai for tanks will never notice another tank, and have a really bad target priority. Then also the path finding for them too is really bad for both ai and vehicles. I also noticed for AT guns for some odd reason will move around instead of holding a firing lane (rotate the whole body), which is really frustrating because they love targeting infantry over vehicles
@Chopstorm.10 ай бұрын
I've pretty much stopped playing the game due to the bad AI. Trying to move an infantry squad out of a mortar barrage, only to have them stop to reload _before_ moving is one of the most frustrating things ever. That, or they'll just randomly stop to shoot something. Or just ignore your commands entirely.
@StrazdasLT6 ай бұрын
6:40 thats why it has 8 wheels, loosing one or two are immaterial.
@bruh591210 ай бұрын
Bo getting gangster on Braun’s tanks.
@toolzim762210 ай бұрын
Pog a new Bokoen Video
@Korinthian-do7sx10 ай бұрын
Its just German steel baby.
@ryleeculla557010 ай бұрын
I think sturm fur has made a realism mod for gates of hell
@apfastdangernoodle240810 ай бұрын
I blame Bo for my addiction to Gates of Hell Ostfront.
@awesomeman922710 ай бұрын
Sherman's forgot to a take wet ammo rack 😂
@Ape18310 ай бұрын
Gates to Hell: It burns on impact, its a tommy cooker! Real world Tank Enthusiasts: Nuh uh uh
@tinytotsog368310 ай бұрын
Any day I get to hear braun cry is a good day
@zihongezrali60536 ай бұрын
they call shermans the zippo for a reason
@Vekhh10 ай бұрын
It's almost harvesting season
@askamikaze393610 ай бұрын
Message to Braun: I understand.
@ryori_vtuber10 ай бұрын
not me thinking i clicked a hoi4 vid confused by the opening card
@kwloy8 ай бұрын
Devs release realistic Sherman, community complains about bias. Not to be a weherhaboo, but the Sherman is famous BECAUSE it was easily replaceable. If anything cost of the Sherman should be brought down, and just deployed in mass. One goes down? So what? We got 100 more where that came from fresh off the production line baby!
@蔡林翰-v2m10 ай бұрын
Panzer 4 的初次命中率本來就比較高,再加上M4、M4A1 、A2A3 的裝甲本來就沒有很高,很容易就會被幹掉的 再加上指揮官上,很多都是已經被發現埋伏了
@Igorilianu10 ай бұрын
Gotta feel for that guy that got bazooka'ed just like in battlefield not CoD holy fuck bo
@owllegostopmotion763310 ай бұрын
Sherman with its irl burn rate of 20% (after wet ammo stowage) and the us suffering less tanker kia than any other major nation
@dwarow250810 ай бұрын
Good job at conveniently not mentioning the cook out rate before WSS and the fragile fuel injections literally setting the tank ablaze on it's own whenever it climbed a small hill before 1943 versions lol. Also funny how you try to bring up the low knocked out Shermans rate while ignoring that the USA fought the least out of all majors in ww2, deployed the least percentage of tanks and only used them when the enemy was on their last legs lol. Tell me again how those M4s did in 1942 against the Italians during Torch lmfao
@owllegostopmotion763310 ай бұрын
@@dwarow2508 I have never heard of that first thing, so please provide a source for that. I would be very interested to hear about it. The Italians were not at torch? Or are you talking to some followup battle to operation torch? (Which may I remind you, led to an allied victory, even though the us troops were greener than a green Pea)
@Pixilated10 ай бұрын
@@dwarow2508 do you not know how percentages work? If the tank was acutally bad, the percentage would be high as it is qualitative. Learn math.
@ikat_tracer10 ай бұрын
Sure. Most tanks Bo cooked off were non wet ammo stowage ones though. I know people don't want to hear it and downplay it but the name "tommy cooker" was created for a reason. Non (W) shermans had catastrophic ammo cookoffs.
@dwarow250810 ай бұрын
@@ikat_tracer You do realise that Wet ammo stowage doesn't prevent a tank from cooking off?
@normalusername522310 ай бұрын
German infantry shrugging off bazooka rounds prove no armor best armor
@svenrio852110 ай бұрын
Devs be like, "My honor is my loyalty" type shit. 😔
@Viking-c1z9 ай бұрын
Idk what they're on about, whenever I play America the German tank crews are turnt to pinballs.
@Tomikchomik110 ай бұрын
Thats why Sherman's have nickname "lighter" ^^
@Domanator17910 ай бұрын
This games great, play it with my friend all the time
@Monarch_GNSG10 ай бұрын
real gates of hell ours
@sp0ckz0mbi310 ай бұрын
USA: Creates the most versatile tank that fights on every front of the war with the highest crew survival rates of anyone else. Germany: tOMmY cOOkEr
@commisaryarreck397410 ай бұрын
It got it's reputation from the early run...the one that had horrible survival rates... The one without wet ammo stowage
@nausimur603510 ай бұрын
All that coping by Braun is just music , always gets skill issued by Bo
@Sylvia_Rider10 ай бұрын
7:21 that ricochet was sexy af
@craigchronicles513010 ай бұрын
good video
@baconhairbacana196410 ай бұрын
It was posted 1 minute ago
@craigchronicles513010 ай бұрын
@@baconhairbacana1964 and it was indeed a good video
@plconqueror504010 ай бұрын
su-122 has a decent armor. i know it from war thunder, as it also came to my surprise how so many of enemy bullets just deflect from this armor.
@commisaryarreck397410 ай бұрын
He was also firing APCR at it's heavily angled side... You know...A round that only performs well on non-angled armor and deflects easily due to it's extremely pointy nature
@Fiona_with_cake10 ай бұрын
shermans arent meant for being thrown at tanks, they have tons of infantry killing firepower but weak against armor. just use a 57mm for that f2 and upscale if needed
@AHappyCub10 ай бұрын
Wtf you smoking bro, the 75mm is now way in hell weak against armor, stop spreading lies about the Sherman
@Fiona_with_cake10 ай бұрын
@@AHappyCub it's not weak against armor, but if you throw the Sherman at a tank it's not gonna do the best, especially the way they were put in the open
@AHappyCub10 ай бұрын
@@Fiona_with_cake that is a skill issue on the operator, not the fault of the tank
@fsociety698310 ай бұрын
@@AHappyCub "stop spreading lies about the Sherman" Stop getting personally offended because people have different opinions about old military hardware...
@Fiona_with_cake10 ай бұрын
@@fsociety6983 it's also not a lie that Sherman's weren't meant to fight enemy armor lol, go look at the doctrines of the time and how they were meant to be used. Although they were often put into situations where they had to fight armor that wasn't its Express purpose
@axdde642810 ай бұрын
no bias from a us tank commander or smh from ww2 it was us tactics to drive 3 tanks to get atleast one behing the german tank so they could destroy its weakpoints (rear of the tank)
dang it 45 secs and im not first love your vids bokoen
@bubbanator7910 ай бұрын
My eye
@twojacksandanace384710 ай бұрын
9:17 You mean Dressel I believe.
@reverendroar10 ай бұрын
More Lethal Company and Fifa
@jcpot408710 ай бұрын
wait you can play coop story missions?
@DragoReborn710 ай бұрын
Time stamps: Beginning: 0:00 End: 10:45
@TheRealCenturion2 ай бұрын
Love the cope of if the first 75 doesnt work, send 10 more. Its all about range in this game , if they have anything above a german 75, you an American would be wise to get a 76 so you can at minimum have the same range , otherwise german 75 will just base out range you. For maximum cheeze replace your commander with a flamethrower unit , bail him out when your close enough and watch the rage commence
@Luffe12310 ай бұрын
cool
@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi10 ай бұрын
7:50 Welcome, the evolution of Men of War or in other words: Just play Assault Squad for an overall better experience lol
@ryleeculla557010 ай бұрын
The Sherman just sucks ass in this game cause all the ammo is stored in the turret basket we’re most of the shots from a AT round explode
@Chopstorm.10 ай бұрын
Every single tank in the game is set up like that barring wet stowage Shermans. They all have ammo in the turret or placed in the sides.
@giantWario10 ай бұрын
The Sherman was supposed to be cheap compared to the German tanks, it was the whole point. It allowed the US to mass-produce them to an absolutely insane extent. They produced 50,000 Shermans in only three years and that's despite the fact that making tanks was really not the US priority given their initial focus on Japan. Meanwhile, the most produced German tank was the Panzer III of which they built 15 000 over 6 years and most of those were already destroyed by the Soviets by the time D-Day happened. A German tank is absolutely supposed to 1vs1 a Sherman. But can they 1vs10 them? Because that's pretty much the odds Germany was actually facing. The Pershing was the American tank meant to be able to 1vs1 German tanks, not the Sherman.
@dwarow250810 ай бұрын
They produced 40 000, not 50 000 but yeah. Also they only deployed a small fraction of those.
@giantWario10 ай бұрын
@@dwarow2508 literally looked it up before writing my comment, it was 50 000. Actually it was ''more than 50 000'' but you know.
@alect52510 ай бұрын
You know, I always heard that, and I still believe it to be true, but why does the Wikipedia pages for the Sherman have it being more expensive than the cost listed on the Panzer IV page Unless its factoring in labor costs in which case I can understand why the Panzer IV would officially cost less to produce
@owllegostopmotion763310 ай бұрын
The Sherman was very capable of 1v1 panzer 4s and all lesser tanks as shown throughout the war. The Sherman was mostly superior to the pz4 especially after the 76mm upgrade. Even the big cats were often defeated by the Shermans, there are several battles where Sherman 75s defeated panther counterattacks. This was also in part due to allied superiority in air power and artillery but still. Iirc there was one case where a platoon of 5 Sherman's (which btw is the smallest operational unit of shermans only reason a uni would send less than that is if they had suffered losses) killed several Panthers by just concussion the crew with HE. Iirc without any losses
@dwarow250810 ай бұрын
@@giantWario 50 000 in total, 40 000 in ww2. Literally from wikipedia
@CosmicTerorr13110 ай бұрын
wait what was that at 1:42
@getnoob819710 ай бұрын
What dlc is that?
@walnzell932810 ай бұрын
Everyone knows German tanks were the best ever and had no problems whatsoever and could one shot everything. That's why Germany won the war, guys.
@joss963710 ай бұрын
braun just need to shut up, he sen tank with no line of infantry for being eyes of the sherman, and take the trap EVERYTIME, sherman maybe bad, but him he need to desinstall the game instead of raging for his own lack of talents, thx
@thedarkman11111210 ай бұрын
Look the Sherman was one of the tanks of world war 2 and was nicknamed the Tommy cooker for a reason its only saving grace is the fact its easily repairable.
@mowfo10 ай бұрын
Play Men of war AS2 modded! it'd be so fun! (literally steam workshop)
@Bizob201010 ай бұрын
Corn
@graysonrichter921010 ай бұрын
Man all the KZbin historians in the comments here spewing factoids at each other. Along with the skill issue on the US team.
@samadams22039 ай бұрын
How the hell did Germany lose ze war?
@ranganesquik292010 ай бұрын
The more I see this game the less I want to see of it, 75mm gun hitting the side armor of a td and doing nothing is fucking ridiculously bad balance
@s0undwavekiller55810 ай бұрын
Braun deserved what he got that first game... who the fuck uses the M4A1... quite literally the most shitter version of the Sherman there is fuckin LOL Also isn't "Tommy Cooker" the nickname given to the Cromwell or am I misremembering?
@bigmonke766110 ай бұрын
The US faction isn’t bad per se; it's just all the guns except the 90mm are shit, and the 90mm is meh at best
@AbsentIntelligence10 ай бұрын
Mid-War era Shermans in Gates of Hell don't have AP shells with explosive filler like they do in Late-War era. I don't know how much the game takes that into account (being inside a tank penetrated by a solid shot is still not fun regardless of if it explodes after, no shit) but it really makes them feel impotent compared to later, especially when the meta thing isn't even to use Pz4F2s, but rather the F1s, because the HEAT shells are both incredibly accurate and effortlessly mince Shermans and T34s both and the firing arc means you can fire from behind cover. Seriously, using those things feels like exploiting.
@thecommunistdoggo100810 ай бұрын
5 Shermans for a Panzer 4! Best tank of the war
@Wegetsu10 ай бұрын
For sure. That's why they won!
@noir192310 ай бұрын
obviously germans didnt lose because they were 3v1'ing the most powerful nations at the time, they lost because their famously good tanks actually sucked !@@Wegetsu
@Pixilated10 ай бұрын
@@noir1923 Well it was both actually.
@indecision383510 ай бұрын
@@noir1923I remember playing with german tanks in War thunder... not a good experience.
@XMysticHerox10 ай бұрын
Warthunder has a pretty nuts german bias (and russian bias as well). Comes from all the casuals picking those nations and then getting fucked keeping the winrate down. @@indecision3835
@reacteddesert718710 ай бұрын
The way the armor in this game is simulated is really dated and shitty
@Man2quilla10 ай бұрын
It's not german bias, this game just sucks
@dustinatkinson574410 ай бұрын
I'll take German bias over the same old Russian bias
@nsdapcommunism278010 ай бұрын
Russian bias didn’t exist in any game ever made
@iamthekingof1omillionsunsets10 ай бұрын
@@nsdapcommunism2780 looks like SOMEONE hasn't played sex with hitler 2
@Pixilated10 ай бұрын
@@nsdapcommunism2780 ok nsdacommunism2780
@Chopstorm.10 ай бұрын
@@nsdapcommunism2780 Good joke.
@dustinatkinson574410 ай бұрын
@@Chopstorm. Right
@Mrkalleck142910 ай бұрын
first?
@Mrkalleck142910 ай бұрын
lets gooo boooooooooooooooooooo
@tharionthedragon353110 ай бұрын
Oh this game _absolutelty_ has a german bias. And it's not even just in the gameplay. The game has always given me the impression that, even in moments like briefings and cutscenes, the germans are always doing some eroic action, a brilliant defence against the enemy, or a cunning and overwhelming attack, or something like that. While, for the soviet in particular, it's the exact opposite: even when they're winning, it's always implied that they're somewhat desperate, struggling, fighing tooth and nail against the germans. Just look at the art for the game: two wounded german tankers helping each other after their tank (obviously it's a goddamn tiger, because it's always a tiger) has been taken out, whike russian tanks burn behind it. It's so pretentious and obvious.
@fsociety698310 ай бұрын
Or, you're just super sensitive to any mention of the Germans in WW2... It's all 100% in your head. Both sides are portrayed as more aggressive in offensive missions and more desperate in defensive ones. That's just narrative, not bias.
@tharionthedragon353110 ай бұрын
@@fsociety6983 dunno man, the "defence" of Berlin is a skirmish where you literally push back the soviets. The first mission of the russian campaign is an _actual_ desperate defence where you have to protect a road with like, 2 AT weapons, a bunch of infantry, and after half an hour of continuous tank spamming, you get 2 early-war tanks and an AA gun. The first true german defence mission has you fght with plenty of soldiers, two defensive lines full of 88 guns, each one with multiple ammo boxes around it so you don't even have to worry about ammo for a very long time. German bias in ww2 RTS games is so common, it's actually frustrating
@riccardocirielli10 ай бұрын
Why do people get surprised? Lol. The advantage of the Sherman was in the numbers. It's pretty obvious that in a situation of numerical balance of a game, A german tank will have the uppehand
@ДмитроПрищепа-д3я10 ай бұрын
Numbers and crew survivability, which isn't really reflected in the game.
@riccardocirielli10 ай бұрын
Exactly, so I really don't understand the whining lol
@lilc23410010 ай бұрын
you can't simulate numerical superiority in GoH, everyone has the same pop cap
@ДмитроПрищепа-д3я10 ай бұрын
@@lilc234100 you also can't simulate competence. Braun was clearly lacking in that regard
@XMysticHerox10 ай бұрын
Nah. The Sherman had a lot of soft factors going for it that made put it on pretty even footing with the P4.
@CommanderTavos9910 ай бұрын
Tommy was a nickname for the British and the Sherman was American.... So this title and thumbnail makes 0 sense xD
@ikat_tracer10 ай бұрын
Tommy cooker is a well known description.
@iamthekingof1omillionsunsets10 ай бұрын
you know if you don't know something its okay to google it
@ThemoonsFullofgoons-qn9xl10 ай бұрын
Absolutely there is a German bias the Germans had the best equipment of course there is a bias it’s just fact 😂
@CalgarGTX10 ай бұрын
People been so brainwashed by post war US propaganda that sherman was the best thing ever that they ragequit when they send them against a pz4 with a kwk40 and face the expected results lol
@ДмитроПрищепа-д3я10 ай бұрын
It was objectively better in terms of crew survivability and there were much more of them because it was much easier to mass-produce.
@ikat_tracer10 ай бұрын
The soviets were literally scared of the PaK 40 which could knock out KW-1s, the KwK 40 is the same thing just as a tank gun, a sherman is easy work for a PaK 40 Is the sherman the worst tank of the war? No, of course not, japan exists. Was it named Tommy cooker for a reason? Yes.
@BlitkriegsAndCoffee10 ай бұрын
Sherman vs Panzer IV was a pretty even match irl.
@Chopstorm.10 ай бұрын
@@ikat_tracer Every British tank was named a tommy cooker during the war because Africa was hot and the British cooked inside the metal boxes called tanks. It being applied to burn rates is a post war misallocation.
@commisaryarreck397410 ай бұрын
@@ДмитроПрищепа-д3я "easier" >looks at US industrial capacity Yeah...That's why there were more compared to the Germans who had to create them in batches due to them lacking the industrial capacity to mass produce them Not because their industrial base was so massive and they could afford to be horrendously wasteful As for crew survivability you're already blatantly lying by ignoring the early war statistics on crew survivability
@M4rcom449 ай бұрын
"Truly the best medium tank of the war" Chieftain Propaganda®