The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See - Full Movie

[@TurboVonCrim]

What we also learned here is the one of the lowest bars for intelligence and critical thinking is the United States Congress.

[@mikloskallo9046]

Which was a big surprise...

[@TurboVonCrim]

@@mikloskallo9046 i was shocked, lol.

[@davidcovington901]

Who rounded up the usual suspects

[@williamrunner6718]

I know and how sad is that? It's downright embarrassing.

[@PeterRabbit70]

I can see why this is in the "science fiction" category. This garbage production says nothing authoritative, whatsoever. Astronaut Gordon Cooper, Capt. Robert O. Dean, Dr. Steven Greer, Pilot John Lear, Astronaut Edgar Mitchell, and hundreds of other truthful witnesses are the men you should listen to. "The Disclosure Project" is another good source. And this clown Dunning picks apart a fake"UFO" film put out by the government, (the tic tac) that most know it was fake, but presented on the news as if it were real. Calling a fake film fake is not much to be proud of.

[@busseyb.227]

I think the most revealing thing about this video is the ATC saying pilots report wrong altitude all the time...That's something I don't want to hear.

[@cliffhorman6846]

My reply to this ... honest report!: So everybody is simply wrong and are making hundreds if not thousands of observational mistakes including trained veterans and professionals from the domestic airline sector and air forces ect all around the world, and none of our world leaders and politicians would lie to us? Thank you for clearing that up for me!

[@sqengineer]

Pilots very rarely report altitude verbally...on board transponder does it electronically.

[@jaquaychesterfield174]

🤔If any one, we should be believing our pilots because they know they see what’s in the sky almost on a daily basis they are trained to tell the difference like that’s when I started to believe is when I heard a few pilots come forward..Smh

[@trem662]

Right

[@rvnmedic1968]

@@sqengineer I don't think that's 100% of the time. I've heard ATC transmissions whereby the controller asks the pilot "what is your current altitude?" Maybe it's a cross-check by the controller to match the transponder's number with the pilot's altimeter?

[@rupertrigsby]

Didn't the US navy have radar data on the alleged UAP's which backed up the pilots accounts ?

[@SydneyAlicia]

Most don't report to not lose their jobs. But there ARE SEVERAL accounts.

[@perfecttattoohistory]

Even if it is a UAP doesn’t mean it comes from another planet. Just because we can’t identify something in the sky that shouldn’t be our bar for something being extraterrestrial or alien. I keep waiting and watching for irrefutable proof of the existence of aliens but so far, absolutely nothing. I truly want to believe.

[@gopherstate777]

The accounts by the pilots were disputed. One of the major problems is that these weapons systems were designed to target enemy aircraft and not ET. And during this time the Airforce failed to recognize simple Chinese weather balloons flying across our country. Birds, a balloon and fighter drone targets are a more reasonable explanation to these mistaken non identifications. I am a firm believer that these craft we are seeing are black op programs run by our own government. And in that case I feel as though they like it when you call it other worldly. Keep thinking its a spaceship guys!

[@keonesilva3646]

Yes ! This dude is lying 🤥

[@Karmageddon85]

I thought men came and erased the data… I may be wrong. But from my understanding, especially for military personnel, they’re told to keep quiet or things may happen. They lose their pilot license, possibly careers, etc.

[@robertshorthill6836]

"But Captain, I canna change the laws a-physics"

[@sidensvans67]

Wins the Internet today .

[@agnostic-atheist]

@briandunning 1) Why did you not mention the Navy pilots who saw/followed the UAPs and the corroborative radar reports from the ships including the target traveling 60 miles in one second? 2) Why did you not mention the Phoenix Lights which had thousands of observers and some with videos? 3) Why did you not mention the Stephenville Lights seen by many? etc etc I appreciated the Carter Sighting explained (although still confused as to why we put a barium cloud into the atmosphere). I believe you cherry-picked UAP events that fit your preconceived belief system.

[@joncoles2089]

Your comment made me decide not to bother watching this Crap!!! Thank you!! ❤🏃‍♀️🏃‍♀️🙋‍♀️🇬🇧

[@Graeck]

The Phoenix lights have been explained. Check Wikipedia, or listen to Brian’s own podcast where he covers the Phoenix lights. He could have covered a lot of other topics/events, sure, but when you have a specific budget and only so much time, you cover what you can.

[@plane_guy6051]

@@Graeck -- Nope, Phoenix lights have not been explained away. Just all sorts of typical BS like flares etc. All just crap.

[@plane_guy6051]

Because his whole channel and agenda is all about debunking so yeah, he's going to be cherry-picking alright.

[@gopherstate777]

Just like you cherry-picked your list of UFO incidents. Instead of attacking someone who came up with some interesting comments and took the time to create a program about a subject we all care about. Why not give your constructive criticism and still support an attempt to get clarity on this topic? I like the Stephensville siting and I find Steve Allen very credible. But the craft might have been ours and that's OK too. The Navy pilots may have been wrong. Their craft is not optimized for UFO hunting. And if the Government is not seeking answers maybe that is because it is secret and the technology belongs to us!

[@stevesloan7132]

If there really is something out there waiting for us in the darkness, then we'd damn well better hope that it's not like us at all. Knowing the bloody career of human history as I do.

[@TJB-qn5fy]

I'm pretty sure the "like us" have already destroyed themselves hundreds, if not thousands, of times over. Like we are literally about to do...

[@dragdragon23]

I agree with your thoughts, our species has a very long history of evil deeds, and it hasn't stopped yet. we are not and may never be ready for a real first contact with aliens from another world. yes, the worse part, they might be too much like us.

[@cliffhorman6846]

My reply to this ... honest report!: So everybody is simply wrong and are making hundreds if not thousands of observational mistakes including trained veterans and professionals from the domestic airline sector and air forces ect all around the world, and none of our world leaders and politicians would lie to us? Thank you for clearing that up for me!

[@lissyflur1907]

UFO's are everywhere, this is a full blown invasion, we need to hide and run, it's over man, it's over!

[@dragdragon23]

the egg-heads in this movie said, it's not possible to travel faster than light, but the experts said the same thing about flying, even at the seed of sound, going to the moon and so forth.

[@Tony_Regime]

one thing about time and distance that is often overlooked is that we always limit any extraterrestrial life form to a lifespan similar to our own even though we are aware of living things on Earth with lifespans far greater than ours. if an extraterrestrial species had lifespans lasting 10's of 1000's of years, or longer, they might not mind spending a few hundred years crossing interstellar space

[@theseventhammer]

Consider a super intelligent alien species that is 50,000 years+ more advanced than us, they would travel through space/time in ways we couldn't possibly understand. We don't have an understanding of true nature of reality, we might have a tiny glimpse but our brains are simply not evolved enough to grasp the full scope of reality, so we can't even understand all the possibilities of space/time manipulation. Bottom line - a sufficiently advanced alien civilization would have ways of traveling that are beyond our understanding.

[@whatwewantAItodo]

All the variables makes the brain tingle!!!

[@marksamuelsen2750]

Valid point.

[@guitarslim69]

​"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."​ -Arthur C. Clarke@theseventhammer

[@Tony_Regime]

@@theseventhammer could, not would

[@styleparade]

So lucky THEY allowed you to upload the movie and let it online tho they don't want me to see it!

[@cybervigilante]

How dare you introduce logic and common sense. To be fair, though, they cover most of the basic facts for people unfamiliar with the subject. As for the clickbait, it's Standard Operating Procedure on KZbin now. Even reputable channels go with Alarming! Terrifying! Frightening! I think Terrifying! is the most popular. 🤪🤪

[@MarcaWasi-jd6xx]

😂😂😂 👍👍👍

[@A.J.Raffles]

Radar on the Princetown tracked what Mick West said in your show was a weather balloon travelling from 80,000 ft to sea-level in under 1 second, which is at least Mach 26. Please can Mick tell us where to purchase a latex balloon with this capability?

[@thomasoaxaca3379]

They were once sold at Toys r US, however, I currently have no information regarding existing vendors.

[@bristlefist]

Mick has some really weird personal issue with this subject. It's absurd. He's just a buffoon at this point

[@haniibrahim2651]

_"Radar on the Princetown ... 80,000 ft to sea-level in under 1 second ..."_ Any evidence for that other than eye witness accounts? Or the other way around: If so, have other possibilities been investigated that could also explain such an observation? Sources? What points to extraterrestrials? You can't always blame some kind of "supernatural" beings for everything you can't explain, even if we've always done so in the past. Only the "beings" have always changed in history. And why did these tic tac objects move so fast w/o reasons or why did they not move away before the jets arrived? Do they want to be discovered? And if yes why did the flew after. Questions over questions. That all is not plausible if you think rational about it. And: "What else could it have been?" is not a valid counter-question for a good reason. Most of this kind of discussions is based on wishful thinking and a cult especially in the US.

[@dennisparani1396]

Well, Mick West is an idiot so there's that.

[@jaydouglas5847]

Mick doesn't have any weird personal issues, it's just that he has taken up the mantle of being a state sponsored debunker , he is the heir to Philip Klass, Donald Menzel and Dr Condon. These government paid debunkers have no credibility with the public.@@bristlefist

[@greengardengreen6666]

The way this program is presented is with earthly human concepts and human way of thinking.

[@kevinparrish6085]

Yeah makes no sense and they have what 2 people saying these laws are laws anywhere in the galaxy

[@fijimermaidfadeto8]

Why do you suppose that is? And who is expected to change this in breadth and scope?

[@cliffhorman6846]

@@kevinparrish6085 My reply to this ... honest report!: So everybody is simply wrong and are making hundreds if not thousands of observational mistakes including trained veterans and professionals from the domestic airline sector and air forces ect all around the world, and none of our world leaders and politicians would lie to us? Thank you for clearing that up for me!

[@kkmik5933]

The 'human' way of thinking will never result in full disclosure and ET contact.

[@Raymondhow]

Well yes, after all they are humans... and rational evaluation of evidence is the best tool humans have to understand reality.

[@anthonycodispoti4306]

This guy is full of crap. He tries to appear reasonable with his debunking logic, but there are holes in everything he says. For example, his questions to the astrophysicist were ridiculous. Nobody asks whether alien civilizations can violate the laws of physics. That’s a stupid question . What people question is whether our understanding of the laws of physics are incomplete. It’s quite possible that we just don’t know enough about the laws of physics that would enable us to travel to places light years away. It’s not that we would be violating the laws of physics, but rather that our understanding of the laws of physics is incomplete. Any physicist today would tell you that our understanding is incomplete because we don’t have a unified theory between quantum mechanics and Newtonian physics. The man who made this video is a hack propagandist.

[@dindjarin7185]

Nothing is against the laws of physics

[@pasimakila6567]

You're exactly right mate 👍

[@robertthelion3195]

Thanks for the honest evaluation. I will pick another video to watch tonight rather than sit through prapaganda.

[@BeatBiographies-xn5iu]

There are plenty of cases that are supported by radar data corroborating eyewitness stories, but this program completely ignored them. The Tic Tac UFO descended from 80,000 feet to the surface of the ocean in a second. Further, it took off at extremely fast speed that US F/A-18 pilots said was too fast for any person to survive, and it went to a location where these pilots were supposed to go for a dogfight in a matter of a second (not to mention that the dogfight location was a secret). There is proof, you just have to look.

[@randynelson8220]

I enjoyed this. But I can't shake the nagging suspicion that it may have been just as much "engineered" as it was "objective". Information control can come in all shapes and sizes, even packaged as skeptical/open minded reporting. It was all just too "canned" for me.

[@Kitties-of-Doom]

yes its a crock of shit. from start to finish lolol

[@williamreynolds6475]

Yeah, just taking the first story that they called the least believable, they imply the journal was written later, when it has been dated. They make it sound like the people investigated the craft for 45 minutes, when it was 5 minutes for them and 45 minutes for the people waiting for them, with the mechanical watches the two people that approached the craft were wearing had lost the missing time. They don't mention plaster casts of the imprints in the soil from the landing. They don't mention that only 18 minutes of the taped audio was released to the public out of 8 hours of tape. They don't mention that the guy that interacted with the craft testified to Congress last summer, or that his medical records for several years after the encounter were classified by the VA and not even accessible by his VA doctors or his Congressmen. They don't mention corroborating radar contacts, etc. And that's the one they thought was least believable, lol

[@jaydouglas5847]

The narrator/producer/writer is a sponsored debunker. He has a string of books covering a wide range of subjects that he "debunks". To give you an example of what he does, and who he does it on behalf of consider this, he states that Lee Harvey Oswald was a sole lone nut as well as that the MK-Ultra experiments are myth. The very same powers that would wish this info to be put out there is the same power that claims there are no UAP. This film is propaganda to counter the recent events in Congress and the media. The powers that be would keep this under wraps will do so with max effort until the very day the floodgate breaks.

[@Kitties-of-Doom]

@@jaydouglas5847 no shit . Crazy. This doc was some of the weakest shit iv ever seen. With head Idiot Mick West and his brilliance LOL

[@Kitties-of-Doom]

@@williamreynolds6475 THis is a hilarious production, i laughed right from the beginning all the way to the end. When they're looking at the Gimbal with head debunker Mick West was the funniest part. Mick thinks its a fighter jet thats 20-30 miles away. While in the original clip by the pentagon the pilots clearly state "LOOK AT THE SA there is a whole FLEET OF THEM" so a whole fleet of unidentified fighter jets INSIDE WAR GAME AIRSPACE were attributed to a UAP account... Brian Dunning really needs to give his head a shake and snap out of it. The cumulative evidence is overwhelming and these fragmented lame debunk attempts are for the mentally challenged. What a joke doc, thats going to live on the internet forever as we move into full disclosure and the whole world laughs at these clowns.

[@pmurray8065]

INTELLIGENT life on Earth is debatable.

[@walkertongdee]

Wales and dolphins?

[@digitalsiler]

indeed we have plenty of stupidity going around but then again the universe is full of electrons protons neutrons and morons

[@dindjarin7185]

​@@walkertongdee Whales

[@poloramon8130]

Aliens judge us by Trump and his Maga followers.

[@digitalsiler]

@@poloramon8130 🤡🤡

[@mikemartin6267]

I’m 73 and in 1969 I saw a triangular solid black object hovering 100 feet over my head in 35 to 40 mph wind gusts. It was completely black against a black sky it looked like a hole in the sky I couldn’t see the object or any details I could only see the absence of stars like a hole in the sky it was at least 350 to 400 feet on a each side it was moving slightly because the stars were winking in and out on the edge of the object. A blue white light came from the object and illuminated me my lady friend and my truck the circle of light was roughly twice as large as my 1969 Chevy half ton pickup truck. I was fishing on the beach in Fort Pierce Florida at the time and was standing in my truck bed changing into dry clothing as I had fallen into the surf and needed dry clothing. I looked up at the source of the light it was on for maybe 15 seconds and then shut off when the object started to move slowly south parallel to A1A and the beach. It was moving at about a slow walk for about 600 feet as it moved away the apparent shape changed to a narrow rectangle shape or the classic cigar shape as I was now looking at it from the side I still could not see the object only the absence of star light in the narrow rectangle shape. The blue white light turned on again and illuminated a car parked directly under the object on the side of the road a person got out of the driver side door and looked up at the object again the light was on for another 15 seconds or so and then turned off. I watched it move south and it got smaller and smaller until it disappeared. There were 6 other witnesses of which my lady friend was not one. She saw it just like I did but she ran to her car and disappeared. I’ve never saw her again. I tried to contact her but she wouldn’t return my calls and she quit her job and I don’t know what happened to her that was our first date. Of the other witnesses they all saw the same thing that I saw except one and he saw a completely different thing that didn’t conform with the rest of us he was very agitated and refused to talk about it ever again. He saw the light, but his description was completely different than everybody else’s. I don’t know what I saw but I know that nothing that we had flying at that time or now could hover silently in a 35 mph wind and not be buffeted around violently. I guess it was a classic unidentified flying object. Two odd things I had a 2 hour missing time occurrence and so did the rest of the whiteness’s I have had 3 other missing time occurrences years after this event, one of which also involved my wife.

[@jimpearson6819]

Sounds like you all have been abducted. Read "Missing Time" by Budd Hopkins for starters.

[@markgreenhalgh943]

Have you ever thought of having hypnotherapy? Going back..filling in the time.

[@Mikegtu2005]

amazing story. You tell it in a matter of fact style. Im still hoping to witness something like you ve seen.

[@marurosado9722]

I have never seen anything of alien stuff in my life, I'm 56 and until now I only see comments, KZbin videos and some tv shows that talk about it, but personally nothing. I don't know how will I react if I see something like that, maybe I will RUN like Forrest Gump and hide somewhere no one will find me ever, maybe like your lady friend, and maybe I'll find her haha 😅 That is a very scary experience , really, mostly when 2 hours of your life where taken and you don't know what happen. May be you have some kind of implants on you ( in your arm, or head, or neck), and that is why you have been abducted later on, and they erased your memory so you are not scare of what they did to you 😮 OMG! 😱 I wish you're ok 🙏🙏🙏

[@andreask.2675]

You really have exceptional eyesight: Seeing something completely black against a black sky. 😂

[@christopherweidensee6133]

I saw it with my own eyes and less than 200 feet above my head, a big "Vanta" black isoseles triangle with six tiny lights, three at each corner and three halfway between each corner. The lights matched the apparent size and brightness of the background stars. This "craft"...and it certainly was a craft NOT an airplane, a helicopter, a balloon, a kite, a flock of geese, nor a cloud of gas. It was as large and expansive as a building. Two tips of its wings spanned the banks of the river I was near. It was just above the tree tops and silently hovering...then moving almost imperceptibly slow following the river in a NW direction. Its mass blocked the known nighttime star constellations as it passed over. If you were not looking directly at it, you would have missed it. I pointed it out to a friend who was walking with me. He had trouble locating it even as I was pointing directly at the center of this massive craft. He was trying to find something much smaller or farther up. I was losing it...screaming, "It's huge, it's right above us...right there!" following it the whole time with my finger. It then began to pick up speed but, still gliding soundlessly towards the horizon. When it hit the horizon there was a bright flash...and it was gone. My friend only saw the flash that lit up the horizon just as my finger pointed towards that very spot. This made us both jump. My friend asked me, "What was that?" I said, "I don't know." This happened in late Autumn, early Winter 1980. As far as I know, our military didn't have anything like that.

[@robertkimball4370]

It is really too bad that you cannot debate Brian D. in front of a live audience. I suspect he would politely decline. He seems to have his mind made up. Very sad.

[@TheMischief9]

..... I saw the same thing after smoking some black afgan .

[@bamskills2649]

Mmmm, no, you didn't

[@86GT11]

Please stop doing drugs. God bless you.

[@teresa_davis]

The only way these “Galaxy is flat ‘ by analogy experts will realize there’s more out there than they can see, is when an alien life form group comes and collects them, and whisks them off to another Galaxy for a real edu experience 😂.. Hopefully they’ll be made to write a hundred times, in multiple dimensions (for all of the equally offended inter dimensional groups).. with a huge quantum compatible, multidimensional piece of chalk, on their proverbial blackboards..”I was wrong, you exist, and you’ve been to our earth many times” and have to wear a galactic dunce hat until returned to earth.. The ship will have to be staffed with Bigfoot, as they probably don’t believe in those either..with a team of grays working as ship maintenance..just for good measure. 😂😅😊 It’ll be a quantum step for academia to catch up with the reality of things, but we can remain hopeful! ❤😊

[@boeing900]

Hard to believe it's been almost three and a half years since I hit the FAA's mandatory retirement age from Continental/United. My final position was 777 Captain. In all that time I saw some spectacular sights. Everything from flying between columns of thunderstorms that made you feel like a small bird navigating thru a Redwood forest, to being lit up, instantaneously, as if by the sun, in the middle of the night, by a way to curious meteor. But I never saw anything I couldn't explain.

[@liamstrauss5477]

I was just a person with my wife in wrong place at the wrong time going home from our friends house in the early hours who lived n a rural area when it seen us chased us stopped our vehicle it hovered just ft above the roof our car rotating before eventually ascending from just above the field to the high up through the clouds.Yes we have a alien intelligence here on the Earth and its very sad not many people know about this.Did i report it .oh yes to the Miniistry of Defence in 2005

[@stemtostern7611]

Enjoy your retirement Captain! Thanks for all those years of taking us earth bound clods into the skies. All the Best to you.. 😜

[@boeing900]

@@stemtostern7611 Thank you very much, I appreciate it.

[@boeing900]

@@liamstrauss5477 That had to have be a life altering experience.

[@samroberts4929]

@@liamstrauss5477Where did this happen?

[@RAM-BAWN]

Funny. I have followed the UFO phenomenon for years. I was an optical physicist at the Naval Air Warfare center and currently teach image processing at a university. Yet, I have never heard of your "expert" Mick West. Also, the objects were tracked by RADAR as well. Hard to imagine that our best pilots could make such a novice mistake.

[@edgarrosa1336]

Its true they never mention about the radar tracking and explaine it.

[@laughingpanda95]

This doc seems like they are cheery picking their information. They said Einstein’s theory of relativity prevents them from getting here because of the light speed limit. But within the same theory Einstein said wormholes are a possibility. So sure you cant move through space faster than light but you can still (in theory) get to the location faster than light takes to get there by ‘sidestepping’ through a wormhole This show has clearly only spoken to people observing instruments as a job instead of people delving into the theoretical physics side of things. If we only listened to the people repeating the norm we wouldn’t have made discoveries All the big discoveries were made by people who were thought to be insane by their peers I mean am i wrong

[@Warwck24]

Very strange video

[@moegreen3870]

@@laughingpanda95 - imo this video is excellent because it debunks portions of the claims debunking allows us to focus resources on the cases which aren't yet explained for example, this video may have revealed that the man behind the Rendlesham lore was exaggerating in later years. that seems very important to know :) and the Salas claims about Malmstrom AFB sound suspicious. :) possibly some efforts should be expended to find out if another guard really was screaming on the phone that the base was under attack? cuz something dont add up there

[@laughingpanda95]

@@moegreen3870 i agree. But itd more healtjy to have both our opinions in tbe same place Rather than just one side dominating. Ive seen so many documentaries that just go off the rails halfway instead of trying to get a real answer. And i dont agree with debunking in the lose sense. It suggests they arnt a skwptic but will only look for the answer that fits the already thought of peramiters. For example quantum tunneling is a way for instant communication over any distance. This doc completly avoided that proven consept in favour of the norm ( messages cant travel faster than light, when they can) It was just a bad watch because of the cherry picking. But the pro aliens people also cherry pick atm Just saying its healthy for both sides to exist as they oush each other towards the truth through the disagreement

[@paulyoung3504]

I only watched the Rendlesham segment then quickly concluded this Brian Dunning character is not a sceptic but a debunker. Highlighting the five second sequence of the lighthouse corresponding with the Halt recording but completely ignoring the fact they were seeing a "strange small RED light", and that the Orford Ness Lighthouse only displayed a white light is misleading in the extreme. I could go on, but simply can't be bothered. If Dunning can make such a sloppy attempt with Rendlesham then I haven't the time or inclination to watch the rest of his nonsense.

[@andrewpursley70]

amen!

[@thebriandunning]

You can get a much better discussion in far more detail here, directly from the people who were there at the time and interviewed by the BBC: ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1c.html

[@AnnaWhyte-g1i]

100% this Dunning guy just cherry picks some facts and ignores others, a really poor documentary.

[@MicheleHerman-kq4ll]

​@@thebriandunningthat is just more BS There are way better true rendition of the actual story on history channel

[@Kronaphasia]

On the Rendelsham Forest case how does the Offord Ness Lighthouse beacon light get viewed 6 miles inland when the lighthouse has an opaque backing screen preventing inland ingress of the light ?

[@kenblack4802]

And not seen each night if it was it at that location? I agree with you and some other documentary showed that it couldn't be the lighthouse.

[@hootonhoot]

@@kenblack4802 Great point. Lighthouse wasn’t put up just the day before. Assistant base commander would have previously been aware of the lighthouse.

[@tma-1704]

Lighthouse do not have opaque backing. they emit light in 360 degrees to ensure the light can be seen from any angle the ship may be approaching. You can google this.

[@tma-1704]

@@hootonhoot It seems to me that the light from the lighthouse may not usually be visible through the forest but was in this instance possibly due to the time of year when there are no leaves on the trees it was visible. The five second flash coincided with the flash interval of the lighthouse light. Other folks may have seen the flashes in the past but recognized they were from the lighthouse and obviously would not have reported it.

[@hansverrezen7619]

ships don't have wheels and do not approach overland. I don't know the exact situation with this lighthouse but for me it makes perfect sense to block the light on the landside if the lighthouse is not on an island. It would surely drive me crazy if my bedroom was lit up like a Christmas tree every 20 seconds@@tma-1704

[@septopus3516]

In reference to the gimbal videos, if the rotation of the moving pivots of the camera are what caused the object to rotate, would rather just the single object in the frame rotating, the entire view would rotate in the same manner as the object. If you attribute the objects rotation to camera rotation, why only one object rotates?

[@InjunAli]

Because thats the mainstream explanation, how many times has the mainstream been wrong? 😂

[@jerometruitt2731]

Because he doesn't know wtf he's talking about maybe?

[@davidreid2301]

Because he's a video game programmer, and a total tosser!

[@kaoskronostyche9939]

Mick West explains it really well. That is, if you want your beliefs challenged.

[@thebriandunning]

The camera itself is fixed inside the pod and does not rotate. The lens/prism/mirror mechanism in front of it is what is gimbaled. There is an animation from the manufacturer showing this at 58:28 in the film. I'm sure you can imagine that a video feed which is always spinning around would not be very useful.

[@chewith]

"laws of physics, as WE know it", WE have barely scratched the surface IMO.

[@freiduumforall8843]

Not according to what they learned by rote at university...nothig else is possible

[@ThatCanadianGuy-e1p]

Until we come to some new type of physics, we have to go with the physics as we understand them now.

[@knoahbody69]

@@ThatCanadianGuy-e1p "Physics as we know them now" says warp travel is possible.

[@142horizon]

​@@ThatCanadianGuy-e1p: No. You DON'T "have to".

[@ThatCanadianGuy-e1p]

@@142horizon Yes you do, otherwise we're just in fairy land.

[@thechroniclesofnessworld6584]

"We" don't have a clue about the laws of physics!

[@SCHEY101]

I think military reports of these things turning at right angles while doing incredible speeds should be a hint we don't know everything. I've got a feeling these things are terrestrial though. Our oceans and the moon would have to be possibilities.

[@retheadeetlefs2793]

@@SCHEY101 That is a hint that it is not a craft of any sort. The inhabitants would be paste. And the craft probably broken up.

[@alightinthesky7586]

@@retheadeetlefs2793 there is a hint that, some civilization with 1000+ yo science has understood and is able to control gravity, unlike humans, which have 100 yo modern science, but still we can understand how to do it, since it is physical reality. according to 100yo physics, when bending space around a ship, the ship does not need to move move, in order to go from A to B, its space around it that is "pulled" towards the ship, B is moved to A, so the ships starts and arrives at the same time. thus the occupants do not have any acceleration, they just see space coming towards them, thus feeling 0 movement, or passage of time, when going from one end of the universe to the other. Einstein predicted this and everything Einstein predicted has been proved a reality sooner or later

[@bamskills2649]

What you meant to say was I don't have a clue about the laws of physics!

[@alightinthesky7586]

@@bamskills2649 he correctly meant humans, we actually call quantum entanglement SPOOKY ACTION. our best scientists do not understand the basics of the ultimate workings of our reality, anyone who is not a scientist, in their ignorance of what they ignore, usually thinks we do, for a civilization even 1000 years in our future, which should have have complete grasp of reality and the advanced engineering, their tech would look Godly to us primates

[@kouzelnamistavceskerepubli1992]

I watched this with an open mind as I like to always like to consider both sides of a story. We are all more than familiar with the incidents that you covered and obviously know about the debunks. Something new would have been interesting. However, the most disappointing thing was your lineup of experts, especially the astronomers. "Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light" Astronomers should be aware that galaxies have been proven to be moving faster away from each other than the speed of light. What we know about physics is being updated, and amended constantly. What is true today in physics might not be in the future. To state that we understand the laws of physics, based on 100 + year old theories is naive. We should all keep an open mind!

[@makik3762]

Thank you!!

[@redplanet76]

Yup! The expansion of space itself is not limited by the speed of light... he left that little nugget out.

[@howardmilano]

So this movie is based on the fact that our understanding of physics dictates aliens can't reach us, and look we're not destroyed by aliens and haven't seen any so aliens don't exist and can't reach us? That is thinking like an ant in an anthill.

[@makik3762]

Exactly. Thank you!!

[@Raymondhow]

This movie is based on the need for rational inquiry into mundane explanations before leaping into "wow must be aliens".

[@mrhenkdirecteur]

The sames goes for being able to get a good video, for starters if they are advanced enough why would they let us photograph them, clearly they are hiding from us, so not having good video and bringing proof that there are more phones in the world than people does not go well either. It's comparing our understanding with their technology. Doesnt make any sense.

[@spuckula]

Yes, this. Those who make mundane statements like @howardmilano is missing the point of the video. I've stated elsewhere in this thread, why not assume Leprechauns? Or witches? Could be Bigfoots. They probably have iPhones and airplanes by now. Why jump to little gray people from outer space?

[@alightinthesky7586]

great comment, best analogy for this movie!! The whole whole thing is made from the perspective of an "ant"

[@Patgag54]

200 years or more ago it wasn't even possible wishful thinking of flying or communicating with a cellphone more powerful today than the computer they used 60 years ago. If you would have taken the smartest scientific people and asked them about that they would have laughed and tell you that it's physically impossible. Do you get it?

[@SWest00072]

Some of us get it - most people will not.

[@bamskills2649]

'Scientific people'? What the... LOL. Someone is confused and it isn't Brian Dunning

[@Thundralight]

The news media was not even covering the Wright brothers first flight and laughing about it as they were so convienced it was not possible.

[@rbdemp]

No they wouldn't have. My late father in law was a television repairman who predicted flat screen tvs 50 years ago, and he was not the sharpest tool in the shed. 60 years ago, Dick Tracy had a two way wrist television. Scientific knowledge and inventiveness is pretty amazing, but they all work within the laws of physics. None of these new amazing inventions violate any of the physical laws, they just access newer technology.

[@Patgag54]

@@rbdemp lots of people thought that Tesla was doing magic tricks when he started with remote control. It was within the know physique back then. It's more easy to forsee an evolving technology, but when the physique is not know at all it's more on the realm of magic. Even Tesla though you couldn't split the atom, or that it didn't release anything. So I believe you wrong. When we don't know something we just can't predict what we don't know!

[@anthonyjoseph8401]

We did not invent mathematics, we merely discovered it...

[@chriswb7]

Do these guys really think that United States Navy aircraft carriers don’t have the radar capability to determine the speed and direction of an object for 100s of miles out on radar? Further - is that not the very information given to pilots to vector them into position to encounter these phenomena(as they testified to before Congress)? Are we also expected to believe that USN fighter pilots - graduates of Top Gun, cannot determine how fast an object is going in relation to their own aircraft…like they train for 100s of hours in dog fighting? That sets the bar for our fighter pilots and the Navy at a laughably low level. Just some food for thought on how little thought and effort was put into this analysis…The Navy has been using radar since WWII, they are not relying on IT guys to draw pretty lines on computers and say ‘watch your parallax and you will be ready to engage!’…Why? because they have RADAR - look up the meaning of the acronym and then tell us some more about ‘parallax’…

[@pillow2k]

LOL! Dog Fighting? They are the one saying Dog Fighting is not a Thing anymore coz they can see each other miles away and can lunch missiles. And Radar don't justify if its a foreign objects not from earth, like the film said there are many factors in radars regarding the speed its not like two cars chasing each others.

[@chriswb7]

@@pillow2kTop Gun is a real school in the Navy - and yes - they teach ONLY DOGFIGHTING. You may as well just rip that bandaid off right now. I would suggest you take my advice and review what the acronym RADAR means…If you think the Navy is sending up 30 million dollar planes without knowing where and how fast they are moving and how fast and in what direction other planes are going (basic air traffic control) well, bless your heart. Apparently these Navy pilots should consult you before trusting in the systems the Pentagon has spent billions on developing…the same systems you are giddy to point out that allow pilots to engage targets beyond visual range - magically stop working when pilots are in visual range...how convenient for your half baked analysis. The problem - That just isn't how radar works, both the jets AND the aircraft carriers can see an objects vector which is how the carrier was able to vector the jets from their scheduled training mission to the general position of the phenomena, allowing the jets to lock their camera on to the object...Hopefully the Chinese and Russian Navies have as low opinion of our sailors and hardware as you do if we ever have to go to war against them. On that point, I think we can agree...

[@WaxPaper]

Radar data is subject to the same interference and error, whether you're on a fishing boat or an aircraft carrier. And then it has to be observed by people, who aren't perfect.

[@chriswb7]

@@WaxPaper That is a powerful rebuttal, "interference and error" - JUST SHOOT ME (the Navy and fighter jets are not running your uncle's fishing boat radar)...why don't you do YOUR service, let the entire Pacific fleet know about the loopholes in our defenses that this movie taught you about...RADAR is what surface warfare stakes thousands of sailors lives on (and by proxy millions of citizens lives). That is a FACT regardless of how you FEEL about the technology, it's limits or applications. It works seemlessly for every major international airport on the planet - but not here and with you . Stop making excuses for shitty agenda driven "science".

[@WaxPaper]

@@chriswb7 Light behaves the same way regardless of what it's bouncing off of, or what it's passing through. Military hardware might be prone to less errors, but it's still prone to errors.

[@scottmitchell6640]

really, you discount the position/experience of a Top-Gun pilot, not to mention the ability of an F16's tracking systems to capture another plane to this guy ...your truly special...

[@alightinthesky7586]

why would you not believe a video game "expert" over a TOP GUN instructor, in identifying what's on a plane's instrument?? you must be biased and irrational :P

[@leemontoya8028]

Hay! You stole my post!! lol

[@tamfuwing1]

Yes, everyone can make mistakes and misinterpret what they see. Also, aliens should never ever be the go-to explanation for a UAP. Earth has many tricks up her sleeve. Ever heard of sprites? Look them up - colossal lightning very high up in the atmosphere. Bizarre things. We don't know our planet so we'll that it can't surprise us with strange and unknown or little understood phenomena - all endlessly more plausible than visits by aliens, as cool as they would be.

[@alightinthesky7586]

@@tamfuwing1 why should the most likely explanation be, not only "never be considered" but forbidden for science when proof is literally flying over our heads, all the time, according to the university of Kiev peer reviewed scientific papers. Not to mention hundreds of military and governmental insider witnesses. They are ALL collectively hallucinating? at some point we have to admit people have been brainwashed to dismiss reality, and prefer to live in denial, in the face of endless public evidence, and witnesses enough to considered the case closed in any court 1000 times over.

[@richardbrown9198]

Just because you don't like the subject matter does NOT equate to "crammed down your throat". Nice, unbiased, neutral introduction there. And re-writing history to boot! How very efficient of you.

[@RectalPower]

Yes but uneducated people will be idiots like always. This is a solid documentary.

[@SUPERFunStick]

Agreed this whole thing feels like it was funded by Neil Degras Tyson and comes off desperate and pathetically unscientific with hints of condescension like project blue book in movie form

[@patricialessard8651]

​@@SUPERFunStick I'll second that.

[@GrampaGrizzle]

Saw one pretty close up. They are real and here. Didn't see any beings but their craft is out of this world. Nothing like an Air Craft.

[@tonyryan8669]

As Mr. Dunnung stated early on in this video " don't believe everything you see on tv".

[@mikewilson9601]

Don't believe it then ! Your problem.

[@laughingpanda95]

@@mikewilson9601he could have been agreeing… youve projected a but there

[@abundantjoy1337]

God, would you stop making these idiot humans, they're just in the way!

[@gypsyrain369]

i Cannot even continue to watch this KNOWING YOU ALREADY LIED TO ME .

[@chrisjoosten9819]

I think this is the most straightforward, most informed video on this subject I've ever seen, and I've seen lots. Thank you for this. It should be a required view.

[@queerfusion]

Debunks a few of the easiest instances. “We’ve only received one radio signal” That’s because alien life forms would have been sending these millions of years ago when we were drooling in caves picking nits off our siblings heads…

[@alexgrovejones]

This feels like it's endorsed and funded by AARO.

[@Deliquescentinsight]

I am a life-long science geek, it is an organic part of me: I am not a credulous bandwagon rider, I have personally witnessed several 'craft' that challenged my personal paradigm of reality. There I have said it.

[@akabrockman]

I'd like to see you take on a few tougher challenges. Like say all the countless hours of footage over the years from Mexico. Btw the pilots in the navy/airforce videos you're trying so hard to debunk had a hell of a lot more information than just a few simple videos. They had these things on radar and actually clocked their speeds and elevations through the entire thing. Now if you want to get into a discussion about the potential psy op they could be pushing we might be able to talk. But if you're just gonna look at those videos without the rest of the information they provide I can't take this seriously. It feels low budget and honestly a lot more disengenous than the recent testimonies.

[@mikewilson9601]

Brian Dunning works on Skeptoid. Try on there if you want answers to many of your questions.

[@spaceman5734]

Ok Brian Dunning focuses on science and skepticism. This is the kind of person who is holding humanity back from consciousness development and ascension IF You believe him. Right now I just feel sad for him. Must hard to be negative and narrow minded. Thank u for reminding me of how small a human brain 🧠 can shrink

[@skttnm]

I do appreciate the grounded nature of being a skeptic. I've been a skeptic most of my life, even though I witnessed the impossible as a young teen. After a long military career, nothing I've become aware of in terms of technology has made me hit that ah ha moment. Using his progressive approach to disproving each event, I still haven't been made aware of anything to make me think what I witnessed could be explained. I understand that I have no way of proving or even recreating my experience. So for the rest of you, my account can't be taken as fact. It still doesn't change that for me, it stands up to all the scrutiny I've been made aware, and has changed my behavior of deriding UFO freaks to finally having to accept that I am a legitimate witness to a real life UFO. I am not one to waste my time searching for answers to things I once believed were stupid, and yet that is what I've done, spent a lot of time searching for answers. I would welcome Brian Dunning researching what I experienced and see if he can dig up a logical explanation.

[@plane_guy6051]

There have been thousands of legitimate UFO sightings made by the most credible witnesses, so it's simply a fact that it is what it is. However, you've come to the wrong place if you want to start talking aliens because this Dunning guy doesn't believe in UFO's or ET. He pretends he does but he doesn't.

[@gbennett58]

Since he is a debunker and not a skeptic, it is easy to figure out what he would do with your experience. Toss it out. Don't believe your lying eyes. You're crazy. That's standard fare from debunkers. A true skeptic begins analysis with an open mind and a willingness to go where the evidence leads.

[@skttnm]

@@gbennett58 Nah. I'll spot if he's objective or not. I question everyone until they show me they are competent and trustworthy. I know what I saw. I'm just as curious if he's a fraud or not. So I would welcome observing his techniques and analysis and if he's just playing mind games or actually doing legit work.

[@Mr2Alley]

What he doesn't talk about with the tic-tac video from the aircraft carrier nemesis, the Nemesis had these objects on radar. He himself is not telling the hole story. The pilot himself testified before Congress, radar itself showed the object disappeared and seconds later reappear 60 miles away. Funny how he doesn't talk about that.

[@robhemsley9181]

Yes I don’t buy the videos but I do buy what the pilots said they saw - there is REAL EVIDENCE that authorities have worked hard to cover up this phenomenon for years - I actually believe they have released videos that can obviously be disproven to distract the people from wanting answers - a mistake unscientific and selective video designed by scientists and others on the basis “ it can’t be therefore it isn’t “

[@juliefarrell3957]

It's the Nimitz

[@rosch99]

A limitation of this documentary is its reliance on the limitations of Newtonian physics when he states that it's physically impossible to traverse the vast distances of space. What it doesn't take into account at all is the possibilities opened up by quantum mechanics. Why couldn't someone warp space/time? We have people on this planet who think it can be done.

[@chipgremillion]

Absolutely!

[@scott-in-dfw3005]

Yeah...once it was impossible to go faster than the speed of sound too....

[@bamskills2649]

No, everyone in the universe must abide by the LAWS of the Universe. Fail

[@86GT11]

Theory is not proof.

[@bamskills2649]

@@86GT11UFO is your religion. Try education. It may help you

[@UncompressedWAVmusic]

Great science and fact based video. My best friend and his buddy saw a huge 100 ft saucer shaped UFO come out of the lake and fly about 10 feet above them in the Laurentians mountains north of Montreal about 1970, It came out of the lake in front of them and flew right over their heads 10 feet up and then kept going up until it disappeared. The next day the Canadian Air Force came into town and asked the citizens in the area if they saw anything the day before. My friend and his buddy never said anything to any officials about their seeing he UFO take off and go 10 feet above them and they kept going up and disappeared. My friend has told me about this about 5 times over the past 10 years. I believe my best friends up close experience is true because he is not the know to BS about stuff. I haven't see any UFO's however I believe in them myself and because of my friends detailed experience. Also I believe that the government are not revealing everything they know about UFOs to us, because there are clearly bans on them revealing everything to the public. Even in the last year or 2 when the Congress had talks with the Defense Dept superiors that they are stingy on what they tell us and it's takes years for the US government to reveal anything to the public even when they say that they are changing their ways and now being honest with us. The government officials are painfully hesitant to reveal almost anything to us. They are just trying to pacify us and only tell us tiny portions of the truth.

[@alightinthesky7586]

wow

[@anopoabednego6173]

Haha, "alien can't break the laws of physics that we humans made up." That is so damn stupid to say. There are planets out there where they without a doubt have different material sciences that we have. They could have a different periodic table, or they have more stable versions of elements in plenty that we do not.

[@axeman1973]

You really don’t understand science do you?

[@drumstick74]

@@axeman1973 Do you really think human science is "as good as it gets"? 😤 We have a long way to go...!

[@megamania501]

Physics can be calculated by using mathematical formulas. All they are saying is that math is the same everywhere, so the physics as we understand them would also be the same everywhere in the universe. You are implying that maybe aliens CAN break these laws of physics, which we formulate using math, then you are implying that somewhere in the universe 2+2 isn't 4, it has to be something else where our mathematical calculations would be incorrect. If aliens can figure out a way to get 5x5 to be anything other than 25, and their answer is correct, then those aliens can have different outcomes to calculations when applying it to physics. Does make sense what they are saying - even in a different galaxy I'm sure 10+10 is going to be 20.

[@NormanLyons-lu3cf]

This movie is so full of shit this movie is basically calling all the pilots and whistle blowers liers this movies has 3 cast members saying thousands of honest people are liers fucking funny as hell

[@d.s.9622]

Not to mention this guy constantly has a condescending grin on his face that just makes u want to punch it…

[@lylecraig-eq7jk]

Bob Lazar's explained experiences working on a UAP. The workings of the craft. What element 115 is and how it's used. There being many too many unexplainable occurrences since the 40's and early 50s.

[@johnwaters123]

Very biased anti-ufo movie. poorly done. He should stop making these kinds of movies. Perhaps he was funded with a grant to confuse the public about the UFOs. Those young physicists will regret what they said in rhis movie.

[@astroblue6207]

This should be called "my opinion debunking UFOs without showing the entire stories or even a single witness" who was there! this is a better title and far more truthful !

[@tamfuwing1]

This is a video about the scientific reasons for thinking that life exists elsewhere, the unimaginable obstacles in the way of alien visits - it can't be magicked away, and an examination of some cases.

[@pekkavirtanen5130]

In the missile silos, then no one noticed that the electricity is out? And there was no way to find the guards who were on the ground at the time of the incident to tell if they saw anything?

[@moegreen3870]

ya i agree, I think this video did a great service to the community by partially debunking the claims made by Salas about Malmstrom but i too felt that there are still some loose dangling ends to follow up on didn't Salas claim that security guards on the surface were screaming on the phone the base was under attack? it makes me wonder if Salas was lying. and/or if there is some way to find the guards and get them to talk about their side of things.

[@grizzjohnson4183]

so we are assuming that what we have to limit ourselves to with regards to space travel, speed of light etc.. we limit alien species to as well. The arrogance of the human species is astounding. Our understanding of physics and maths is ours and ours alone. We know little to if anything of the universe.

[@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors]

Correct!

[@merihkarabulut1785]

Thats right, just hunderts years ago we been thinking our galaxy was the entire Universe.70 years ago we were thinking ultrasonic travel is not possible

[@eytansuchard8640]

You are spot on. Actually Hermann Bondi's inertial/gravitational dipole and my paper on electro-gravity offer a way to the solution.

[@timujin1000]

Spot on! It's so dumb

[@yongdongsongdonge163]

Speed of electricity (or light) + electromagnetic tunnel + perpetual magnetic attraction force = FTL; Ion propulsion. Think wormhole but acceleration instead of teleportation. Add perpetual repel behind the space craft in tandem with the attraction force for silly, improbable speeds... Anti-gravity = adjustable electromagnetic field from a magnetic core, because you don't want to get caught by anything while travelling such silly speeds. Magnetic fields being dipolar doesn't matter when you have mastered electromagnetism, you can draw poles from the center of magnetic core to be hexagonal (dividing energy), or direct one single pole with all the energy. Though energy won't matter at that point since perpetual and limitless energy production has been fact since watermills (if that line of technology was continued into magneto hydro dynamics). Also, wind turbines + magnets in correct angles = perpetual energy because a magnetic field does not decay and magnetic friction = electricity = charged field = more energy rather than loss of energy.

[@waynewalker1503]

We humans based everything around our understanding, so basically, we think if it can't be done, then it's never been done before. 😕🙄

[@makik3762]

Thank you! 😄;)

[@ellayararwhyaych4711]

That's not true at all. Plenty of imaginative people around doing the `impossible`. Plus - think about the people that `believe` we never landed on the moon.

[@queerfusion]

And how many times have we proven ourselves wrong? Everyday we have a new breakthrough…

[@dalzy1969]

WOW! GREAT MOVIE! After studying UFOS for the last 7 years and being a “believer,” I could have only wished I saw this film earlier in my research career.-Unemployed

[@thebriandunning]

Thank you much.

[@brunozeigerts6379]

I remember an old TV show called Project UFO, where two men from the Air Force would investigate UFO sightings, and usually come up with an explanation. (though the end of the episode would imply that the incidents were real.) I remember one incident where the investigators themselves saw a odd craft floating past the restaurant where they were eating. Both took copious notes... but when they compared them... found out that the notes didn't match! Also, the craft was a mock-up hung from a helicopter as a publicity stunt.

[@stevelauda5435]

LOL I liked that show

[@gregkeller4151]

Hide it all in plain site with a healthy dose of the giggle factor. Been doing that for decades. Look what the mayor of Pheonix did after 10,000 people reported those lights in the sky all over the area one night on March 13 1997. He paraded a staff member out at the press conference the next day dressed as a 7 foot ET. You better believe he didn't come up with that on his own. He even apologized the next day for insulting all his citizens intelligence to save his political face. Again it's all very carefully orchestrated. But people are waking up!

[@sciencemansandera]

there's more than that, they call them selves the sons of God and they were 150 feet in front of me and there ain't no way in hell the government can explain this one they showed me the magnetic sphere of the Earth and we are in trouble😮😮😮😮 and I've seen the governments craft I know what they have and what Russia has

[@a.r.r.5626]

Hey! You're from the 80's, too!!!

[@brunozeigerts6379]

60's, really. Looks like more than a few remember that show.@@a.r.r.5626

[@SUPERFunStick]

This feels like a desperate project blue book part 2 in documentary form

[@moshar12]

For real! Fact!

[@Kitties-of-Doom]

yes its for the mentally challenged. Stupid doc from start to finish

[@Kitties-of-Doom]

need you on a clip i made dedicated to this subject! see ya under there! :) Much love!

[@Raymondhow]

Nothing desperate about it, just trying to shed rational light on extraordinary claims.

[@infinitemonkey917]

What are your exact criticisms?

[@thedanishvikinginnorway6980]

Interesting🙂I love science and reality. I just want to say that in this debunking there is some holes to be filled out. And let me tell a story from 1985 in Denmark. I was a intelligens patrol soldier in the Danish army at that time and was nearly living in the forest constantly. It was the cold war so the Red Army was our main objective at that time. I remember one night the alarm goes off and we all run to our main duties getting ready for what was comming. In the background we could hear the F 104 starfighter warming up and in a few minuttes they was airborne with full power beyound mack 2 on the way to a Danish Island Bornholm close to the Russian Border. We found out later that Nato has been watching on rader 2 misiles(at the time that was what the fought) comming in at 18000 km/h toward Danish teritorie. The pilots could see the objects on rader and 4 different raders on the ground as well observe the objects. Then the f 104 arrive the spot and the pilots looked out and confirmed the objects visual. And all this is on record🙂The pilots then say to ground control the bookey is right ahead weapons locket on, and then the pilots looked op and no objects to see. The pilots report back bookey was gone, then the ground rader could see that objects have accellerated up trogh Sweeden with 22000 km/h. And all this is comfirmed from 4 radar stations and pilots as well. So debunk that 🙂

[@iRossco]

Think you have your speeds x10 😂

[@noriohaya]

This is definitely the best UFO documentary film that I have ever seen. It is based on science, logic and common sense. Which is quite rare in today’s so-called Ufology. This is one film that everyone needs to see.

[@alightinthesky7586]

science that says they know the "LAWS OF PHYSICS" and their laws are universal is not science

[@dmartin23]

you do have actual accounts of what happened at Ariel school? They were later interviewed as adults and all still said the same thing. They are obviously still alive today

[@mmg6060]

The hardcore of people pushing for a non-human intelligence explanation to some UAP, aren’t suggesting an extraterrestrial origin to the phenomenon. They’re considering the possibility of it being local and proposing we may have a limited understanding of the nature of reality. It’s true we have a set of tried and tested rules according to which we evaluate nature, and we call it scientific knowledge. But science is not dogma, and we’ve reached our current level of understanding being curious about the oddities of nature and questioning the status quo.

[@vmguedes]

Exactly

[@arcanics1971]

Then you must conclude that we are not in a position to suggest anything other than the rational explanations within our understanding. If the explanation is outside of our current understanding then it is outside, and any speculation is no different to fantasy.

[@mmg6060]

@@arcanics1971 Persistent testimonies from reliable witnesses of unusual events, apparently incompatible with our current knowledge, should elicit our curiosity. Scientific progress originates from the study of outlier data. If we just abide by the orthodoxy, we’re into religion, not science.

[@newforestpixie5297]

Out of everything in the comments this one & the 3 responses are those which make me feel most comfortable.

[@thewell-knownskeptic5008]

Occam's razor applies. The most likely explanation is NOT aliens OR something else unlikely, whereas we KNOW humans are error prone in making observations.

[@Unhacker]

Subtitle: "Science Rickrolls your Conspiracy Uncle" Thanks for sharing this with a far too credulous world, Brian. :)

[@catbaluu81]

The Universe Never Stops Growing, Expanding, and Enlarging!!!

[@Maizy1985]

I've seen them, I've been abducted many times since 1964...they do exist. As to where they're from I have no idea. Believe or not...I don't care. They can deny and debunk all they want but it doesn't change the fact that they've been visiting here for a VERY long time.

[@martinwebb1681]

Those of us who know, know, those of us who don't, don't, it's as simple as that.

[@wilhelmw3455]

The Dunning-Kruger effect came to mind while watching this video but it is was still worth a watch.

[@pmcelraft]

@Brian Dunning love this. I saw the Easter egg behind you, nice touch.

[@patrickirby9825]

This video is as disingenuous as the debunking efforts that went on with Project Bluebook during the 50s and 60s. Until J. Allen Hynek finally had to resign due to his eventual realization that much of the phenomenon wasn't debunkable. Its a slap in the face to all the aircraft pilots whove spent thousands of hours in the air for many years, and who see things that are explainable every day, but who have also seen clear, solid UFOs on occasion. An honest debunking effort would be to have had these pilots and other witnesses on this video, in person, to be able to defend their claims, as opposed to what this video did, which was to simply dismiss and insult them with misplaced and extremely weak explanations. Pilots don't mistake planets for UAP. Brian Dunning, I respect most of what you do as a skeptic, but this effort sounds like a transparent, religious presentation. There's science, and then there's sciencism. Einstein was largely ridiculed for nearly 20 years before his theory of relativity was finally proven. And Edison was the butt of journalist's jokes for 15 years after stating that he was working on electric light. And those arguments were as lacking in honesty and substance as yours are here.

[@williamverhoef4349]

"Pilots don't mistake planets for UAP. " Some have done exactly that. They also regularly mistake satellites being launched as part of the Starlink Project as UFOs. The only difference between pilots and you and me is that they can fly aircraft. They don't have special insight. "scientism" There is no such thing. It's what people call science that conflicts with their political or religious beliefs. "Einstein was largely ridiculed for nearly 20 years" That is incorrect. Einstein was never ridiculed by his fellow scientists. And his theory was immediately considered interesting and plausible and evidence that Einstein said would support or contradict his theory was immediately sought by other scientists. When that evidence supported his theory, it was accepted.

[@geo.p.5747]

Hahaha, Brian Dunning graduate of Jim Oberg's School of debunkers. I'm going to side with the military police, and, there was about 25 or 30 of them that conducted the search operation at Rendlesham. These individuals were assigned to guard a nuclear stockpile, but were so stupid, they couldn't distinguish a lighthouse blinking light from a floating object that shot up into the sky, Yeah Ok. And, The Ariel School Incident, I'm going with Dr. John Mack's conclusion and the kids who witnessed and drew similar pictures, while separated from each other. And today their story remains the same. Couldn't continue, but, I'm sure you got it all explained.

[@alightinthesky7586]

he is unbiased LOL

[@Rubo_G]

This Brian guy is joke. Disinformation plant

[@Rubo_G]

The garbage is coming out of your mouth brian

[@thebriandunning]

"From the Jim Oberg school" would be a very great honor. Thank you!

[@AnnaWhyte-g1i]

@@thebriandunning you're an absolute disgrace. I've never watched a more biased and unbalanced doco. You cherry pick facts that suit your agenda and claim this report to be science based, it is nothing of the sort. You get some close minded arrogant science hacks that noone has ever heard of before to back up your ill informed 'scientific' claims whilst dismissing radar evidence, thousands of sightings and disclosures from trained observers and from highly credentialed military staff entrusted with our most dangerous and expensive weapons. Somehow you think that despite this they misinterpret what they are seeing and are trained to observe. Just a terrible job attempting to discredit and debunk and obviously a complete hit job on the topic. Well done on exposing yourself.

[@spideyrolan]

Excellent stuff

[@sullyway51]

Brian Dunning, living in a skeptic's paradise. A whole 2.79k narrow minded subscribers who cannot seem to think outside the box.

[@axeman1973]

Pretty dumb aren’t you

[@billyhallmon6867]

This movie follows the typical debunker formula.

[@paulcooverjr.6947]

Ya, got CIA written all over it.

[@johnedwards5828]

Mick West is his daddy.

[@AA-zc4vd]

"You can't break the laws of physics"....LMAOL

[@kennyjames4679]

The world can't be round. The world can't not be the center of the universe. Saying something is impossible is completely unscientific.

[@Raymondhow]

@@kennyjames4679 No idea what your comment means. Who said something was impossible?

[@robertmeshew1935]

Mr Dunning, if your interested in the location of these two sites, I would be willing to share the location with you! I am semi-retired but still fascinated by these happenings! Although I have seen several UFO's, I lived near one location for 10 years till I saw the wormhole and 5 years until I saw the entrance to a mountain, in a different state! I have some friends that have seen other craft around this area, but I have not seen those other craft they speak of! One thing I have noticed, when their are several sightings of craft in an area, you can bet their is a base nearby! I was consumed at first to find out everything I could about UFO's, and other phenomenon, now I have a more passive passion for the subject, kinda like, if you have seen one, you have seen them all!

[@scottplumer3668]

This was brilliant. The comments are hilarious, too. It's like people don't want us to use the scientific method, or demand good evidence.

[@queerfusion]

lol, it’s a movie. Debunking only what could be debunked, most of it is fluff

[@scottplumer3668]

@@queerfusion Was there something specifically you had a contention with? What cases do you think can't be debunked?

[@queerfusion]

@@scottplumer3668 they were cherry picked cases, there’s millions of cases. Even the government had made admission of UFO. Trying to pretend or fool the public they do the exist is ludicrous…

[@WilliamDangerNewman]

THANK YOU BRIAN!! It is so refreshing to watch a program on the subject of UFOs/UAPs that approaches it from a hard science perspective. I particularly enjoyed the historical research you did on the more famous UFO stories frequently cited as "evidence" on pseudo-scientific television shows. Also, the segment on Mick West and his analysis of navy pilot UAP videos, using his Sitrec program, was fascinating. I think this documentary should be mandatory viewing for anyone in congress holding hearings on this subject, and certainly for anyone assigned to establish a task force to investigate UFO/UAP reports. Please keep up the great work! I can only hope more people will watch this documentary and, in the end, gain an appreciation for a skeptical approach to extraordinary claims and the value of a rigorous scientific analysis of them.

[@thebriandunning]

Thanks - my pleasure!

[@alightinthesky7586]

real science does not say they know the "LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE"

[@GrimJackal]

These comments, man. I just can't... It's so sad seeing people make the usual logical fallacies when their beliefs are confronted.

[@makik3762]

Oh year, and that naturally can be said about the both sides.

[@thetamihana2561]

Sir the craft our whole family observed wasn't on TV.

[@elgalloazul]

Oh boy. I hope you got some good footage to show others, or you might not be believed.

[@alightinthesky7586]

this may be the worst of it all, the disrespect for the experiencers, even for TOP GUN instructors who unlike all the debunkers, WERE THERE

[@twonumber22]

that was probably Venus

[@johnnydoe1984]

It was probably a barium gas cloud release 😂

[@twonumber22]

@@alightinthesky7586 What's funny is that Fravor's story has changed a little every time he tells it. But it wasn't believable from the beginning anyways.

[@fatenabu1]

Would the Stealth Bomber be considered extrodinary if it was seen before the general public was told about it, when it was still considered classified?

[@blakecrosby5123]

What would be extraordinary is if it was flyn around when Christopher Columbus was sailing.

[@fatenabu1]

I was thinking more so of the guy that the government drove crazy because he saw experiemental aircraft, and intercepted government frequiencies so the government drove the man crazy with false messages and false information. Also the Columbus situation could've been many different things that may not have had explaination back then. With that said Columbus wasn't the greates navigator or person. His log mentioned how he lied to his crew about the length of the voyage and kept telling them they were almost there. He didn't do proper navigational methods thus lied about how long the voyage would take. Also all of the Columbus talk even mine above isn't real evidence as described in the video. Saying it is aliens is just speculation. There are theories, it could've been a star, a meteor shower reflective luminous marine life, fires in the distance, or St. Elmo's Fire (plasma discharge observed by sailors). If we are going to throw aliens into it though we can say it was an angel, a wil-o-wisp, a dragon, time traveling graden gnomes. My point is with the Columbus situation is we just don't know what it was and can't know because his journal isn't great evidence.

[@curbozerboomer1773]

Back around 1990 or so, I was on vacation with my family near a lake in e. Washington state, The lake was surrounded by very high foothills, creating a canyon-like effect. One day, a weird craft came barreling down the length of the lake, maybe 500 feet or so above the water...I knew that it was some sort of military plane, but was quite radical looking!...Turned out to be a Stealth Bomber on maneuvers...it was a rare sight back then...we were quite freaked out!

[@fatenabu1]

@@curbozerboomer1773 I remember hearing a lot about triangular UFOs in the late 80's early 90's... turns out the stealth bomber is quite triangular. Once that was released to the public and eventually retired in the 2000s people didn't see triangle UFOs anymore..

[@yannmaenden7236]

The concept that you could see the lighthouse, at ground level, through the trees - but it wasn't visible from the elevated control tower on the nearby air base seems unlikely. Also on the tape the guy said the light was red. Lighthouses don't have red lights.

[@queerfusion]

My thoughts exactly, some of the debunking was piss poor

[@Mike-rd7pg]

This is the best video on this subject I have, at 76, ever listened to, great work.

[@leemontoya8028]

You believed this? No wonder you got a heart! Crazy!

[@Steven-p4j]

What a terrible program. The McMinnville incident has never been shown to be a hoax.

[@tamfuwing1]

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMinnville_UFO_photographs - there are pressing reasons for considering it to be a hoax. And that stereotypical saucer shape - oh my. Remember that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which do not exist for any encounter being a verified alien encounter.

[@Beaup53]

His lead scientist’s answer was “NO. Not possible!” 😂 I think this documentary may have an agenda… And it may be brought to you by the people of Philip Morris 😜

[@williamverhoef4349]

The agenda is that "alien aircraft" is an extraordinary explanation and the reasons for that explanation being extraordinary are discussed in the video. But nowhere does the author say that it is "impossible".

[@nickcosmo9387]

This plays like something made for TV in the 1980s.. LOL

[@solar172]

By far the best program and explanation of this subject i have ever seen, thank you so much Brian

[@kentpirate2411]

Well this has turned me completely off being interested in ufos!

[@DavidMiller-co1vd]

Lack of depth is stunning

[@leslie1526]

Love it, hopefully this will de-bunk all crap videos and tv shows

[@gf0x90]

We should always remember that our science and technology are only about 400 years old and we are in space since about 60 years. If there are others civilizations out there, it's likely they are thousands years more advanced than us. We are starting now.

[@twidknobbler]

Thank you for this important, interesting and educational documentary! A much needed salve for the UFO fervour pervading the socials currently. Having seen UFOs twice in nearly 50 years of life, both events very different, with one occurring at night during the 1990s and another during the day around 2014, I still haven't found viable explanations for either.

[@murtmurt7297]

What one did you see in the 1990s, I saw one too

[@neilpattie6146]

As soon as they said the laws of Physics are immutable was a red flag. Einstein would not be so presumptuous. Maybe they could explain spooky entanglement at a distance. I’m sure Mick West would have an answer. The Nimitz data involved multiple readings providing a wealth of data. All ignored. The hatchet job on Rendlesham Forest and Ariel School as laughable if it wasn’t so downright misleading. Again evidence was ignored. I found myself concerned watching this. Someone is paying a lot of money to make this film and actually distorting data and ignoring information to fit an agenda.

[@humungushumungus213]

Fart monsters from 🪐 outer space😂?

[@Jordannadroj20]

Looks like a controlled demolition to me

[@travisyork2462]

Small minded thinking at its best. If they are more advanced there are many ways they could get here. Anti gravity, zero point energy, worm holes.

[@VernReynolds]

Simply seeing something is one thing. Detecting it in the IR Spectrum, radar, lidar, sonar and the other things that the military uses is quite something else.

[@livethemoment5148]

i detect clearly that you are a bonehead

[@NeilStamper-j4x]

Amazing!

[@burningpaper]

It seems to me the only way to sort this out is to properly report and analyse candidate events. Governments seeming to hide and deny these things just lends credence to the idea that there is something going on. Whether there is a way to overcome faster than light travel is impossible for us to reason out with our current knowledge. But if there were a legitimate visitation then we’d have to ask a different question, not whether it’s possible but how did they do it. At the moment we should remain agnostic on whether they are there or not: there is too much secrecy and too many people saying something is going on to just dismiss it from first principles.

[@kenblack4802]

I LOVE your comment, so true, 'with our current knowledge'. You, have earned a LOT of credibility with realizing the truth of all things. Kudos!

[@jm844]

Watch ALATRA MOVEMENT TODAY , this documentary is false , calculations were already on the screen of the video and he's just falsely calculating what is already there , it goes into the ocean and out , you can't falsify that.

[@jm844]

Watch ALATRA MOVEMENT global crisis and Vamfim on the same page , also creative Society

[@christineyates1507]

Who is 'they' click bate

[@dfsoto1]

@thebriandunning, I really enjoyed this movie as much as the other two you made. I also enjoy your podcast. My only question is: Where did you get that sweet hoodie?

[@thebriandunning]

Get it on the Skeptoid store: skeptoid.com/store

[@scherrypierce]

We can't be the only life in the universe.

[@Raymondhow]

Yep, and Dunning agrees with that.

[@leroy.jackson.4804]

We're not.

[@VaughanMcCue]

Cats and dogs are to be included.

[@dindjarin7185]

Hasn't been here

[@leemontoya8028]

Yeah! What makes us think we're so special? we're not!! 🛸

[@chavenyenketswamy1498]

I got a negative perception after watching this as if they were not entirely fair in how they assessed and dispelled certain incidents like the Ariel School. Differs from lengthy documentaries I have seen including the more recent Netflix UFO series released by Steven Spielberg. Personally, I have had two encounters with similar looking black triangle UFOs in South Africa at much closer distance than any of these sightings and till today have not found an explanation for their origin.

[@WaxPaper]

Then you should look up the facts yourself, and find out which is a more truthful account.

[@plane_guy6051]

It's because the guy is a debunker. He doesn't believe in UFO's and is trying to spread the word that everything everyone is seeing is fake.

[@kentaylor5333]

Iv'e always thought 95% of reports are mistakes, but I with two others have also had two convincing sightings, 1954, seven same size cloud like white ovoids in a sled formation, all vanished after each moved 2-3 lengths of themselves & 2002 a dart like black triangle with two bright globes on the under side, it took the same flight path as US Air force planes do on a regular bases ( Oxford shire ) but with white & blue lights.

[@neilpattie6146]

I wonder which agency paid for this movie

[@kenbrandt6100]

I've been listening to and financially supporting Brian Dunning's podcast for so long, and it's a trip to see the face behind the voice.

[@alightinthesky7586]

@@theeverythingelectronicsst3897 lol

[@juancho71]

DUDE THE CAT IS OUT OF BAG.... AND YOU AND THE PEOPLE BEHIND THIS INSIDIOUS CHANNEL CAN NOT PUT IT BACK INSIDE.

[@Tangerine-rj5tr]

This video is a slap in the face to people who've had a close and personal visual of a craft they can't explain. This video cherry picks events that can be explained in other ways but doesn't mention events that have compelling evidence. Everything in reality can be disproved with speculation of other possibilities. That doesn't make the event untrue. There's just too many.

[@twonumber22]

There is no compelling evidence. Just eyewitness testimony, which is unreliable.

[@digitalsiler]

"anecdotal"

[@WassaMatterU]

My favorite part was the use of the scientific term 'knucklehead' to describe hoaxers. :)

[@gcfasparks6053]

Brian, that is one of the most honest and informative movies about the UFO phenomenon that I have ever seen. Thank you and keep up the good work.

[@kymjohnthorburn6044]

thank you

[@BioBuddy3000]

You should have covered the varginha brasil incident in 1996. I think eyewitness accounts from people that had encounters feet away from beings.. and family members of victims affected are far more compelling than 62 school children. Even though you misrepresented how those Ariel school children were viewed…no one ever said they were poor African children who hadn’t been exposed to movies. That was you speaking from an agenda to discredit those accounts.

[@ethannielson942]

This is 90 minutes that I’ll never be able to get back. This was such a one sided, biased documentary that even Carl Sagan would have serious issues with it. A COMPLETE waste of my time.

[@BioBuddy3000]

@@ethannielson942 Yeah, I was trying to be as nice as possible but this Brian Dunning guy had a clear agenda. Also, this is his niche. I call it dishonest skepticism.