The Uncertainty Principle | Genius

[@rijuchaudhuri]

Just imagine hanging out with these legendary scientists...

[@anjanidubey6796]

Riju Chaudhuri it would be one of the best experience of my life But i have few friends like this they and i always hang out like this

[@AL-SH]

Inam Ul Haq I don't think Niels Bohr was Jewish. I've red his biography and got a sense that he was an atheist. Also I must note Einstein's belief that the quantum world was pre-determined, was due to him believing in God, while Bohr's theory predicted it was randomness, meaning nothing is pre-deterministic hence thre is no higher power.

[@AL-SH]

Inam Ul Haq So what? Brian Green and Laurence Krauss were born into Jewish families as well. What's your point here?

[@piloco9890]

What does being have to Jewish have to do anything with this? It never should have been brought up in the first place

[@3ric585]

Inam Ul Haq lol

[@faaeizkhan6134]

Teacher: Where is your homework? Me: I didn't see it, so it never existed.

[@mikethegamedev]

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!

[@tokensharma3738]

🤣🤣🤣🤣 but homework is not a subatomic particle. Albert Einstein said that what applies for subatomic particles should be applicable for larger particles too. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@jefflee6393]

Wrongg you didn't do it so it never existed

[@jefflee6393]

HAHAHAHAHA

[@faaeizkhan6134]

@@jefflee6393 a better way to say it...

[@panda4247]

Uncertainty principle is like taking a photo: You can (with short exposure) see the object clearly where it is, but you have no idea whether it was moving. Or you can (with long exposure) see a smudge on the photo, the longer it is (given the same exposure), the faster it was moving, but you can't see the object distinctly in any position. I know the analogy is quite far from the real quantum stuff of Heisenberg's principle, but it's close enough for the laymen we are

[@capbin146]

I like this!

[@RD-lt3ht]

That was really good! Don't sell yourself short.

[@klaranelson11]

Now that is the best comment I read on this stupid machine. EVER !!!!

[@haleema7754]

YOU'RE SO SMART

[@puneetmishra4726]

That's a brilliant, brilliant analogy. I'm gonna use that if someone asks me to explain it

[@krishnarana16]

To be honest, Neils got a point, “Automobiles aren’t subatomic particles”

[@mylifephysics.8929]

But they do have subatomic particles.

[@Crusher29]

@@mylifephysics.8929 What is the chance that the automobile will pass through you with quantum tunneling?

[@mylifephysics.8929]

@@Crusher29 That's the biggest quest I am on.

[@SHIVAMKRTH]

Blz Albert Einstein has power to imagine any thing in the world less than 50 second that is make a Albert great or true genius

[@erikerikson5434]

@@mylifephysics.8929 its impossible for an automobile.

[@trws97]

“If anyone says that he knows everything about universe then either he is lying or he is a fool." - Neil Bohr

[@reddondaroo6075]

This was not true statement..

[@himanimalhotra1071]

@@reddondaroo6075 That's true Einstein too was challenged by Hawking.... And still cosmos goes on

[@photon-9551]

But we cannot be certain about that.!

[@barryfoster453]

We can apply this to climate science, also. If anyone says he knows (even roughly) what the average Earth temp will be in a decade, he is either lying, or a fool. We can go further, if he says he knowsall about the climate system, or even enough to make a prediction, or even on Earth's climate sensitivity (to CO2), or the end result of feedbacks. Any yet...climate scientists and physicists can't go a month without making this stuff up. And they get away with it because of the political climate.

[@bones23jones]

Did Neil know somebody that said he knew everything about the universe?

[@rajnishjain8484]

Einstein be like: "I'm quite *uncertain* about *The* *Uncertainty* *Principle* "

[@soumyaneelmukherjee11b58]

Lol

[@curiash]

@Our ship Barham Take 50 cents..

[@FrankCapybara]

Our ship Barham Jesus Christ

[@govindasharman425]

LOL

[@of8155]

@@soumyaneelmukherjee11b58 u r here.

[@therealkodami]

I love how they’re dissecting the fundamentals of the universe as if it’s a regular conversation for them

[@aGenericBanana]

T r u e

[@blasttrash]

we can also dissect. lets start :P

[@donaldkasper8346]

Which was all they could do at the time without many instruments, or accurate ones. They pushed observations backed by conjecture as far as they could.

[@arjufreefire2106]

I love talking like that way with my friend 🥰

[@bart7176]

Actually, it was a regular conversation for them. Einstein spent 8 years of just digging that topic to propose the general theory of relativity, he was at pretty bad health as he was almost all the time just studying this particular theory.

[@raghunotreghu]

Why I learn everything from KZbin and not from my school?

[@antasena1219]

Same me2😂😂

[@vyshnavimb3778]

Reghuram Karunamurthy 😂😂

[@AdityaKumar-ij5ok]

Maybe your teacher's voice is an unpleasant sound, that is, a random mix of different sound waves, it also happens to me also

[@geoeira]

Because they teach you how to pass the test, not to actually learn

[@darkseid856]

Because schools are useless . Internet (if used it correctly) is much more useful!

[@smkh2890]

Heisenberg is driving along at high speed, when a traffic cop pulls him over; "Sir, Do you know you were driving over the speed limit? 90 kph to be exact! " " Oh great!" says Heisenberg. " Now I'm completely lost!"

[@suegha]

I heard a different version of this joke: Heisenberg get pulled over for speeding and the cop asks him if he knew what speed he was doing, Heisenberg answers, "No, but I know exactly where I am!" LOL

[@juanmedrano2616]

Better joke would be cop Him over and says excuse me sir, do you know how fast you were going? Reply: nope, but I know where I'm at!!!

[@pbase36]

Sorry guys, but smkh's version of this joke works better. Causes you to think a bit.

[@suegha]

@@pbase36 I agree! :)

[@philpullan8595]

This made me chuckle 😊

[@socrates4730]

Its sad how casually these things are taught to us in college.

[@LoxagosSnake]

And it's even sadder how most university professors don't understand them, yet expect to 'reinforce our knowledge' through testing.

[@chizhang2765]

Isn't the uncertainty principle simply from the wave picture of particles, since for wave-like systems in order to have a definite location in the configuration space you need to add a very large wavenumber span of plane waves together?

[@exhalerwolf1272]

So true. I only learned how to answer the questions in exam and related calculations. The actual theory I learned from books and KZbin videos lol.

[@superlambmilkshake4904]

oh my god ikr

[@user-eo1vk]

@@exhalerwolf1272 For me at class 11 According to my syllabus there was only short definition and formula about uncertainty principle But my teacher taught me in detail and assigned students to research about it,but I was lazy

[@kaikaci2743]

When someone tells Einstein he has to use his brain

[@aformula4198]

Not just someone..Neils Bohr!!

[@mridulkalita3099]

Bro it's Neil's Bohr...he was also one of the great genius scientist of all time..

[@akashsunil7464]

@@mridulkalita3099 ikr he is lit he is just as lit as einstein just that he couldnt rise up to the fame as much as einstein did he literally made a system that was so great with so little flaws like 2% or so which was later on corrected to be orbitals can u imagine that just think of the power of his imagination that too he did that during epidemic in just one year over the most complicated matter that startled everyone for years he is a GENIUS

[@ejmtv3]

@@aformula4198 wait I thought they were archenemies then why are they together? or was this before the great debate?

[@aformula4198]

@@ejmtv3 They had an academic disagreement which led to discuss..Not "enemies"

[@amardeepsingh3914]

Einstein's logic is right. But quantum mechanics defies common sense.

[@BlakaveliX]

That is to say nature defies common sense. Notions of "common sense" would have to be re-evaluated if they don't abide by logic. Also, Einstein was wrong on this.

[@Exl6243]

Not only that, it is addressed later by Erwin Schrodinger's own thought experiment, known as the famous Scrodinger's cat.

[@SnillhundReal]

The universe has no obligation to make sense to what we petty humans concider common sense

[@dozog]

Common sense is what we believe about the macro world around us, as a result of experiencing it every day. You might say experience *defines* common sense. Common sense *defies* reality.

[@99bits46]

Imagine if Einstein had expertise in Quantum Physics. He would surely have revolutionized it just like modern physics 100 years ahead in time.

[@camos5670]

Ghaddafi was a pretty smart guy...

[@nadeemshaikh7863]

camos he looks like gaddafi😁

[@juliuscaesar635]

LMAO

[@sajmirlatifi2309]

He was smarter than 🙄SOME people. *old joke but worth mentioning

[@sajmirlatifi2309]

He might was smarter than 🙄SOME people. *old joke but worth mentioning

[@mathslegacy12]

😂

[@MrBikashchachan]

What did i learn from this video is: Neils Bohr once saved Albert Einstein's life😁

[@Enthalpy--]

It was Neils Bohr who said that electron revolves around the nucleus in a well defined path.

[@study69696]

I got to know that they are from same timeline lol

[@abhinavraj4845]

@@Enthalpy-- He never said "revolves around."

[@twinkle_pie]

@@Enthalpy-- 8th or 9th standard physics

[@BATMAN-df5ee]

@@abhinavraj4845 He said bruh

[@sahilnaik3079]

The goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us. It should be to understand it fundamentally, no matter what use it might have. He said it !!!

[@taltezy2941]

The best thing Einstein ever said was, “Compound interest is the 8th wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it; he who doesn't, pays it.”!!

[@anuj8825]

Are you finance/commerce student lol... Trying to find relevance with Einstein

[@taltezy2941]

@@anuj8825 No a project manager. But, at the same time - someone who doesn't want to pay more money than he has to.

[@siddbastard]

So basically Einstein was Jew. Oof, incredible

[@Coolgiy67]

anuj- coder Einstein did say that lol

[@ankurr5803]

I don't think so ,in my opinion the best thing he had said is when someone asked him that how it feels to be genius he replied ask Tesla.

[@JohnDoe-dj3lw]

1:20 the world owes a lot to Dr. Bohr xD

[@1_adityasingh]

lol

[@abdqs853]

Ohh you don't even know the half of it. Try researching the guy

[@ViratKohli-jj3wj]

@@abdqs853 r/woooosh

[@PartialViewmusic]

@@ViratKohli-jj3wj linking to subreddits outside of reddit... Also, it wasn't a wooosh. It's clear Abdullah understood that John referenced that Bohr saved Einstein in this video but wanted to expand on why in the real world Bohr did so much for us. In particular the Copenhagen interpretation and the first hydrogen atom model which later led to the full formulation of Quantum Mechanics.

[@shobhittiwari1220]

Haha it is just 1% .

[@vikaspawar5193]

KZbin's uncertainty principle: If you scroll through the comment section, you will not be able to see the video. But if you see the video, you won't be able to scroll through the comment section.

[@universe1focus985]

It is not applicable for KZbin app in mobile phone?

[@Adhjie]

@@universe1focus985 yeh multitasking is dame some researches say

[@rajababy2009]

@@universe1focus985 and hence it is another Uncertainty

[@versanehere]

Simple but yet very effectively explained same theory as uncertainty

[@kliteishere9818]

Use two devices

[@CP4521]

"Chemistry is the study of matter, but i prefer to see it as the study of change" - Heisenberg (2)

[@zolanhlangulela947]

The Scientific rivalry between Einstein and Neil’s Bohr was an amazing one..

[@lu881]

I would've loved to have lived in this neighbourhood. Imagine going to an everyday local store and standing in line and then finding Einstein just having a normal conversation about quantum physics while ordering a large pumpkin spice latte.

[@himquantum]

You would have thought "this guy is crazy" because of your clouded judgement originating from your common sense

[@abc67]

A pumpkin spice latte is an aberration harder to comprehend than quantum physics.

[@rishinigam9070]

According to this video things which are not visible to us uncertainty principle follows on them so if car is not visible uncertainty can be applied on them this is called quantum theory..

[@nakiyapardawala4113]

@@abc67 hahaha

[@NewMessage]

I think I liked this, but I can't be sure.

[@bestofbest6187]

genius.

[@91722854]

you can only be sure that you like this if you don't know what it is, but you can be sure you don't like this if you know what it is

[@bush-b5330]

You liked it because you are a subatomic particle floating in the Cyber space at high velocity

[@avgb2115]

That's an underrated comment

[@booperdooper5490]

Look at the thumbs up button, if its blue, it means you liked it

[@oppongroyalty9399]

de moment we nearly lost Einstein 😂😂

[@yorkerold]

Is this real history?

[@nithin1729s]

Probably

[@SA-yn6pg]

ToxicPaad *the

[@avikumar1128]

He did it intentionally.

[@ishworshrestha3559]

Ok

[@dessination9763]

I guess everyone in this comment section is an Oxford graduate Mathematician

[@Sara-ji6xv]

you mean physicist. mathematicians don’t know this.

[@dessination9763]

@@Sara-ji6xv r/wooooosh

[@SM_Int.M.S]

@@Sara-ji6xv really? Spotted another science professional from Stanford University 😂

[@sirajaryan2525]

9 class students too

[@marwahammoudi6421]

I'm a high schooler

[@anandsriram5242]

Einstein: “Why should I?” So lit 🔥

[@sirihasatippavaram4199]

Yashraj mukhaute huh

[@durgeshjhariya9910]

quantum mechanics is more weird then macroscopic world.

[@sciblastofficial9833]

durgesh jhariya Hahahaha you will be stuck in this prison forever and never escape! Also it’s made out of graphite and thick, so you won’t just shrink between the atoms. Have fun! (shrinks to size of quark) (pops out) What the? I HATE QUANTUM TUNNELING!

[@abdullahomarkhan1950]

Particle in a box C

[@arnav257]

@@sciblastofficial9833 I'm sorry to pop your bubble but that's not how quantum tunneling works.

[@danishakhtar00795]

Schrödinger's cat

[@kabeerkhan1323]

How ?

[@jamesonde2336]

"Sit with the winners, the conversation is different."

[@soumyasishbhattacharyya2805]

If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you,you haven't understood it yet

[@DNXTMaster]

if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you have only hit the tip of the iceberg

[@shwetasingh7621]

I think this is a linr of Neils Bhor ....maybe i am not certain about it

[@wholelottapain8130]

Not even Einstein could understand it

[@divinemind6407]

@@shwetasingh7621 Einstein quoted it

[@centralprocessingunit2564]

these are all your opinions

[@miku1408]

Here after watching Oppenhiemer, loved this mini series about Einstien! They could have done something similar with Oppenhiemer as well..

[@siddharthsharma4730]

This was the time when all those things were discovered which we study in our books Nowdays.

[@siddharthpatil6358]

Actually uncertainty principle is correct but Einstein used it in cars case where the uncertainty is so less because of the mass of the car that it can be totally neglected.but in case of electron it should be taken in confederation as the mass is of the order10^-31

[@AnonyMous-kg3hx]

*consideration

[@zeevkeane6280]

You are right, but still doesn't explain the doubt that Einstein has which is of the logic used to deal with the quantum world. So what he is saying is "there must be soemthing else which is more logical, therefore more correct" now whether he is right or not that's a different story.

[@uniquescience401]

Yes u r right..

[@carswithsean7967]

I like turtles

[@indigenous6550]

But everything is made of atoms and they have electrons, so why not the cars ? It's got nothing to do with Mass but relativity.

[@badrloudghiri2526]

I think this is the most Intressting debate in the history of science.

[@wafeeqahqazi]

Every scientist made a significant contribution to the scientific world even if all the points ain't right still we should look at the things that were unimaginable to our common minds and provided a path though to led the afterward discoveries...Respect for all☺

[@jacobzaranyika9334]

Thank you 🙏 National Geographics. You know I watch you ALOT & appreciate your support.

[@afguns4life507]

Now this is what I call evolution. From these big brain headed scientists to us playing games or watching KZbin 24/7

[@aditisk99]

Devolution you mean?

[@ronaktiwari-ls9uh]

You are talking like everyone, at that time was like this . Every era has his set of intellectuals who are busy working for the progress of humanity.

[@ARBB1]

Einstein was very much against Quantum Mechanics. Not only for the fact he believed _God doesn't play dice_ , but because of the sheer non-intuitive nature it presented at the time. Kinda ironic when you consider he was the one to explain the photoelectric effect. Well, I don't remember right now if he ever gave in.

[@laibaiqbal158]

God doesnt play a dice....plz elaborate what that exactly means....plzzz

[@Georgexb]

Laiba IQBAL It’s something Einstein said as a reaction to the nature of Quantum mechanics which states that you cannot know exactly where something is, only a probability that it is there. This was against Einstein’s intuition, but Bohr and others eventually proved it was correct. While Einstein was right about a great many things, he was wrong about QM. I like to think however, that were he alive today, he would be quietly pleased that someone proved him wrong.

[@laibaiqbal158]

@@Georgexb thnku so much

[@istudy2194]

@@laibaiqbal158 playing the dice means quantization, thing is only allowed somewhere or it can only have a specific value Like, an electron is quantized, it can't just go anywhere (like in the nucleus and that we have nodal planes) At the same the electon cloud that we have is also a probability density We know the places where electron can never be and places where can just give probability just like the probability of playing a dice

[@laibaiqbal158]

@@istudy2194 thnku....

[@hardikkadd5114]

I love this line The thing which you can't see, you can't apply any rules! He is a lover of classical physics more than quantum

[@appsenence9244]

This show false tho. Einstein was one of the founders of quantum mechanics, he won his nobel prize for his paper on the photoelectric effect in 1905 and he discovered brownian motion. Everything that is said in this scene is completely false, it's funny to see how everyone in the comment section is using this to dissect one of the most brilliant scientist we have had. Lol. Maybe people here should go to google scholar, type in einstein and read some of his papers. That is, if you can.

[@hardikkadd5114]

@@appsenence9244 hahaha, my bad luck that u replied to my comment

[@salujathustra9905]

We are but eddies in the whirlpool. Blink, and we disappear. Nothing is more fleeting than appearances, and yet we hold onto them.

[@danenergetics3907]

Elaborate, you deep, struggling poet!

[@thechaosgardener]

When I teach the uncertainty principle to my high school students I use the analogy of a pool table in the dark. You can hear a collision and can guess where the ball was... but where it ends up is a mystery. You can estimate the speed of the collision based on the volume of the clank...Its not perfect but it helps.

[@terranrepublic7023]

0:40 The problem is the universe does not conform to human logic, all we can do is make the best observations we can and deduce conclusions from them

I just realized, I'm basically a caveman.

[@Sabit190]

You're not alone

[@abhirammanthena7333]

😂😂😅

[@dv9239]

Me too but luckily I can use a smartphone atleast

[@esskayesss69]

Or are you? *Vsauce music plays in background

[@dusathemaid]

Where are your fingers?

[@ridhabelabbaci8776]

" the goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of things around us but to understand it, fundamentally" ...it's just made my day :)))

[@crusadeagainsttomatoes2518]

I love this, im reading a book about this just now!! It's so incredible that this book is from 1989 and the topic from the book is mentioned here! So cool!!

[@tanaysinha8377]

Thorcody which book?

[@isaacnewton7424]

Genius by Walter Isaacson maybe

[@1258-Eckhart]

1:05 "Science isn't there to be USEFUL, it's there to help us UNDERSTAND the world." Indeed.

[@kosmokritikos9299]

01:09 Understanding that which cannot be understood. Calculated, yes. Measured, yes. Observed, yes. Understood, never.

[@79ompatil26]

I'm still uncertain for the uncertainty principle.

[@vinayakkapoor1]

Om Patil but i can say with quite certainity that the uncertainty is not uncertain!😁😁

[@Neo-br3uc]

That's the beauty of Quantum Mechanics. It doesn't seem logical, but it's the most logical explanation to everything in the universe

[@donaldkasper8346]

Undersampling causes quantization. Proper sampling problems converts that into Continuum.

[@b11-x3o]

@@donaldkasper8346 that sampling is different from qunatam sampling I guess.

[@curious_banda]

​@@donaldkasper8346 You are confusing aliasing with quantisation 💀

[@donaldkasper8346]

@@b11-x3o Take the second dominant trough in infrared mineral spectral, correlate it to refractive index at 8cm spacing. What do you get? A match sometimes. Go to 2cm spacing, what do you get? An exact match. So pattern identification can be dependent on resolution of the measurement. What is the standard in mineralogical infrared research? 8cm. Oh, so 75 years and they see nothing. Okay. This is your science. Undersampling resolution can lead to sporadic identification and false quanta expectations.

[@donaldkasper8346]

​@@curious_banda Your are confusing cause with effect and equivalencing them. Aliasing is from undersampling, and that undersampling is probably the cause of quantization phenomena. You also fail to understand that quanta are not a natural state and neither are so-called physical constants. How are they achieved? For you, the cause is magic. For me, it takes a force that is energy to enforce quantization and constants in systems. It takes a regulator. If you cannot find the enforcer/regulator of the quanta system and constants, then you don't have a grasp of the system or there is no quanta or constant. 1800s physical constants are not natural things, they are placeholders to equivalence equations and define behaviors with improper and incomplete equations.

[@sciencetanium3216]

Seriously and truly speaking, I learn more from NATGEO and TED-ED than I learn from my school Seriously, School system f*cks. 😔😔

[@captainlux409]

School is not a real school as it should be.

[@maxwellsequation4887]

Try learning from your own brain

[@jdgaming3719]

But school is necesessary for a Job, even though you can't learn anything from it.

[@martinxy1291]

They dont tell you to imagen or think, they tell you to copy and memorize. And I have fully accepted my fate as a printer

[@biluroy2426]

I am thinking indian education system worse are you indian

[@billskinner7670]

Getting hit by a car IS observing the car.

[@distrologic2925]

Even without having any idea of physics you can tell that those actors also have no idea of physics.

[@zerksez9963]

Lol

[@cr7forever445]

Oof this is deep

[@memati7199]

tell me one wrong quantum mechanics info that they mentioned and is wrong !

[@memati7199]

@CluelessAmerican it is because i think that this is superb acting .

[@user-eo1vk]

They definitely have some knowledge about physics to perform in these roles

[@HimanshuSingh-cl2yk]

Mom : go to school Me : I'm not seeing it , so it doesn't exist.... Flying sliders on my face**

[@praneelpathak657]

Well actually this is real. This isn't a joke. It's not about the quantum world. If you aren't conscious of a thing, it isn't existing relative to you. As everything is relative, other people who are conscious of your school must have the school relative to them as existing, but not your relative school will exist.

[@yogendratiwari2682]

😂

[@battlefieldclips7013]

The more u understand the quantum mechanics, the more u don’t, as if described by the uncertainty principle itself !!!

[@Unknown-sg4tv]

Time Travel Rules 1. Only observe don't change history. 2. Wear chothes from that time period. 3. Only spend 2 mins in the past to prevent any mistakes that would change history. 4. If history is changed by mistake go back and change it back. 5. Find a hide out so the time machine doesn't fall into the wrong hand's.

[@legendaryzet8450]

Nah, I don't think the universe would allow you to change history so much that you cease to exist. Another thing to add to your list would be. If you do anything, remeber the butterfly effect.

[@BrushEm]

@@legendaryzet8450 the butterfly effect may be greatly over-exaggerated

[@legendaryzet8450]

@@BrushEm i don't think so

[@Adhjie]

@@legendaryzet8450 also possibility of doppelganger

[@versanehere]

@@legendaryzet8450 what's butterfly effect

[@utkarshsingh96]

That era was fabulous... Believe me!!!

[@da_knug]

its not einsteins fault that he almost got hit by the car, it was simply going so fast that it would have been impossible for him to accurately determain its position

[@mewhen5172]

Imagine almost being hit by a car and some weird thought struck you.

[@Sean_Coyne]

At least one famous physicist has walked into a pole and had a light bulb moment (can't bring his name to mind offhand).

[@amritsingh4251]

Or getting hit by an apple on the head

[@joe18750]

It not a weird thought. He (nearly) walked into the perfect analogy with the subject at hand. Serendipity.

[@unbenevable]

I love this SO much. It's so fun to see those cars whizzing thru them. Oh, the quantum potential of it all. Oh, the mystery.

[@panditbharatmukhraiya7428]

OMG! These two legends. I want to be a part of these sorts of conversations.🤩

[@themightyspartan1012]

Me too my friend.

[@jawadkarim1156]

0:55 this moment tells alot

[@anuradhainamdar8967]

When ever I go though a National Geography programme I add to knowledge.

[@GreatHikariShop]

Einstein VS Niels Bohr, ERB should created this one !

[@shahsadsaadu5817]

Hikari Shop bottle would roast that einstein

[@blockbyblock4078]

That would be amazing!

[@atuljoshipura]

I am dumbstruck and speechless after each episode ends. unmoved with impact of presentation. this series is an institution by it self and benchmark for all the departments of involved in movie making. acting and micro level expression is so classic that i see all repeated episode in week. This is Master piece teamwork

[@molono1451]

Idk why their accents make this so much better

[@dovbarleib3256]

It is wonderful that Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr were such good friends. One argued for G-d having the Name Elohim, a rational cause and effect G-d. The other argued for Y-H-W-H that at any particular moment in history, water could run uphill..

[@mirdhinisaisaravanan]

"The goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us." -- That pretty much sums up why they say that physicists hate engineers.

[@y2kmedia118]

"the goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us, it should be to understand it, fundamentally." I absolutely agree

[@kitkatnerva4203]

tesla is also a genius! feature his story please natgeo:)

[@amalguptan6716]

True scientists know that tesla wasn't a true genius. He was a crackpot who refuted general relativity on the grounds that 'The math was complicated'. He was an engineer to begin with.

[@amalguptan6716]

Picasso is next

[@christopherdonaghue2461]

Good God! I cannot accept that. Picasso - really? Not at all a worthwhile selection. I have nothing against Picasso, but when season one is Einstein, season two cannot be Pablo; the bar is just too high. Feynman! Now there would be a good series! Such an enjoyable one, too; a true genius with such a story, so many pranks and asides and so much good humor.

[@rubaiyatdunno482]

You think that Picasso is superior to tesla?

[@serdnae]

Christopher Donaghue It looks like Nat Geo wants to make series with all fields, not just science. It's a good idea for reaching a greater audience.

[@babekhurremi4386]

I were used to get what the Einstein says , though i havent learned that neiter ar school nor myself i just knew it before. But the Heisenbergs uncertainty makes me think a lot.

[@rajghatage7151]

0.37 the golden moment for the observable universe.

[@vincentbrk]

Watching this series after Oppenheimer movie is such a treat. One of the best ever made.

[@morimori7456]

"well, then, if you don't start using your brain to observe what's right in front of you, you're going to get yourself killed", everyone says that to me cause I am always lost in my thoughts half the time thinking about random things that do not make sense

[@rakeshmallick8040]

And if this really happened that is Neils Bhor saving Einstein from an accident we must be thankful to him.

[@powerdriller4124]

Einstein has done already his contribution 10 years before.

[@JackMiller-lq4qd]

😂😂😂🤣

[@chessfoundation7538]

I am always inspired by Albert enstein

[@khushibhushan2007]

The reason that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is applied only on microscopic objects is that the energy of photon is insufficient to change the position and velocity of macroscopic objects on striking

[@TorMax9]

Like Bishop George Berkeley said way back around 1750, ''esse est percipi", or ''to be is to be perceived''.

[@SOSULLI]

The biggest challenge is combining the theory of relativity with quantum-mechanics. Seeing as quantum-mechanics is one of the most accurate theories ever created in explaining reality, however is unable to explain gravity. Scientists like Einstein and Planck never fully accepted it, their view was that the theory could be valid, but only in a deterministic equation, or that it only explained a certain part of the theory of everything. And there are deterministic views of quantum theory like the multi-verse one.

[@ashishdean8901]

Where I can find complete season of Genius- Einstein

[@StoneToStars]

Two geniuses 🙏🙏❤️❤️😭😭

[@humbertlong3042]

Heisenberg be having us shutting our eyes walking through traffic

[@AbhishekVankit]

Well, my counter to what Einstein said about the automobile is that at least 'someone' on the street 'saw' that automobile approaching them, so yeah it could exist by that logic. My larger point in case... You need not shut your brain and stop your pursuit of challenging ideas... but that also doesn't mean that if your brain isn't able to comprehend something presently... that it cannot be possibly true.

[@HyperIonMake]

The flaw in Einstein's logic is the fact that he expected the universe to obey his idea of common sense. As the person who developed relativity I'd hoped he would be more open minded. In my mind the idea that subatomic particles disobey what we see in normal life makes even more sense than the idea that time disobeys what we see in normal life at high speeds/other circumstances.

[@jigmatdolma3968]

Ok, and how does the disobey makes more sense? I am really curious

[@duykhanh7746]

@CluelessAmerican he was not really skeptic, he refused to believed it even though there were many scientific researchs about quantum physics, about life being probabilistic (theoretically), because it makes absolutely no sense if you think of it normally. But in the end, his objections turn out to be a huge evidence for the importance of quantum physics.

[@De2Venner]

Einstein was also one of the people to develop quantum mechanics (His paper on the photoelectric effect). His problem with quantum mechanics was entirely due to his belief in things like energy conservation, momentum conservation, among others. A weaker mind would abandon these concepts when it comes to quantum mechanics, whereas Einstein tried to reconsile the two… Hence his objections.

[@farziltheweebo4841]

True. ​@@De2Venner

[@MONSTERDR451]

@@duykhanh7746 [bell] labs bic banagrams

[@georgemanka]

I wish I had physics taught to me like this!

[@benefactor4309]

Einstein guided Bhor in an excellent way 😊

[@adlerkraft]

Funny thing is, Heisenberg was a chad who disapproved Bohr's model and Relativity theory (in quantum world), and yet never argued with these two.😊

[@erikjunior8686]

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle led us to view the quantum world as one that favors probability over certainty. This also led to a "battle of titans": For Bohr, we lack the language to understand the quantum world, but for Einstein, God does not play dice with the universe.

[@kurama5350]

Heisenberg thought about it and now we have to study about it.

[@brainstormingsharing1309]

Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

[@umachaturvedi7912]

"Particle doesn't exist unless we see it"

[@ramupoudel2002]

Can u explain plz???

[@zfg07]

@@ramupoudel2002 ask bohr

[@ramupoudel2002]

@@zfg07 he doesn't know actually . It is only hypothesis

[@amiraaxel2935]

Can we have a full movie of this? This is awesome!!

[@jb6652]

I want someone to have this conversations on daily basis

[@swayamdubey7513]

"Heisenberg uncertainty principle disproved with certainty"...

[@eternalsoul3439]

Einstein forgot that there is a conscious observer behind the Steering wheel attached to 4wheels. 😍

[@philasogwa8875]

So it's......relative?

[@eternalsoul3439]

@@philasogwa8875 This universe is Relative to the observer that's why Theory of Relativity works..

[@eternalsoul3439]

@@philasogwa8875 An obsever is must for the universe to exist for example the universe in your dream doesn't exist without you, Universe doesn't exist without God & conscious observers.

[@eternalsoul3439]

@@philasogwa8875 Possibly after your death car will drive over you & you are a ghost 👻 nothing happens to you at all.. That's the base reality called God, Consciousness & Universe itself..

[@ppmpyae1152]

@@eternalsoul3439 and the proof is?

[@WiseCrackingT]

Cop to Heisenberg: You will be penalised for overspreading! Heisenberg to the cop: where am I ?

[@blaazer9473]

No, the cop will pull over Heisenberg for a broken windshield on his Pontiac Aztek.

[@Sebbir]

I love that they actually got a danish actor to play Niels Bohr

[@unicreations3626]

Okay so if we don’t see particles , they won’t exist : my question is how are the collisions between particles happening around us and creating atmospheric pressure if we don’t see it ?. Collisions are happening that means they exist , chemical reactions are happening that means particles exist if we see it or not , chemical reactions were happening when humans didn’t exist , when Big Bang happened many things happened and we were nit there to witness it , how does particles don’t exist then ? Unless there is something else involved other than particles if this theory is proved. 1:39

[@vaishalimane1333]

How wondrously he explained Niels Bohrs with about to sacrifice his own life 😁

[@saadbinshariq9789]

When Einstein almost got hit by that car, I thought he'd realize that since the velocity of the car was so fast, he couldn't determine its location and nearly got himself killed. But the opposite happened.

[@genghisthegreat2034]

Entanglement makes a fender out of three particles

[@real4487]

So Albert was actually wrong somewhere 😄 Actually subatomic particles behave differently than bigger ones as they have larger wavelengths.

[@tom.swellow]

As a matter of fact, Neils's coming right to me saying "automobiles ain't subatomic particles"

[@Sigma3095]

Time will stop existing if you hang around these geniuses!!!❤