I hope you enjoy this short video on the war aims of the interested nations in the Austro-Prussian war. If I had another week, I should have probably liked to have included a few other minor nations like Saxony and Hanover (though, apart from a few territorial changes, or in Saxony's case restoring its pre-Congress of Vienna borders, these states didn't really have any groundbreaking aims). Either way, I hope you can enjoy it. As usual feedback is welcomed, and feel free to point out any mistakes.
@thebalkanhistorian.32052 жыл бұрын
Looks great! I love the upload schedule
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
@Anthony Thank you very much. And yes I absolutely agree. Longer form documentaries/series is what I’m looking to build up to. At the minute I’m still in very much an experimental phase with the channel, just to see what works, what I enjoy making etc. But it’s longer form documentaries is definitely what I want to switch to in the near future.
@StaffordMagnus2 жыл бұрын
@Anthony The flipside to this is that longer videos, let's say 20 minutes or more, may dissuade casual viewers from watching them due to time constraints and suchlike. A good compromise might be a one hour documentary, but split into three or four parts for easy consumption. Just my 2c.
@orlandogreenhow28702 жыл бұрын
@@StaffordMagnus He could do a mix of both; a couple of short-term videos like this one and then a long video which, as you said, could be split into chapters.
@JonathanWJ2 жыл бұрын
It feels like I've read several comments now from you regarding your regret in the way you produced your videos. Why don't you stop prematurely publishing them and do everything you want to?
@rodmaknouni2 жыл бұрын
I hope you continue to focus on this period of history pre-WW1, you're filling in the void there is in youtube from this period with this perfectly animated and insightful content!
@toh79042 жыл бұрын
You might be interested in the Real Time History channel if you haven't heard of them already.
@rodmaknouni2 жыл бұрын
@@toh7904 They’re good too, already subscribed to them
@charmyzard Жыл бұрын
True. This era is looked over massively when so much 5D-chess was being played all over Europe.
@nightdragonx1232 жыл бұрын
More 19th century European history with colorful maps, favorite thing to see on my day off
@mooseguides84022 жыл бұрын
You would love Victoria 2 & 3
@somehistorynerd2 жыл бұрын
Is Victoria 2 gonna become free once Victoria 3 comes out? Like what they did with Crusader Kings?
@santi26832 жыл бұрын
@@somehistorynerd I don't think so, CK2 was made free because you already have to pay around 5 times the base game's price in DLC
@sergeant_chris62092 жыл бұрын
The funny colors on the maps really do make all the difference
@Tommi4142 жыл бұрын
Damn, can’t imagine anything more basic. Only ww2 fanatics are worse.
@SamAronow2 жыл бұрын
“This strategic muddle alone shows why the Habsburgs deserved to lose in 1866.” Harsh but fair.
@micahistory2 жыл бұрын
wasn't expecting to see you here
@dayros2023 Жыл бұрын
The Austrian strategy didn’t make sense at all. They would lose north eastern Italy anyway, so instead of sending more than 70000 soldiers there they could have kept them in the north against the prussians and win against them, while leaving only a token force in the south to slow down the Italian advance.
@martywc Жыл бұрын
One of my favorite rare gems commenting on a video from another one of my favorite rare gems is very nice surprise.🤩
@ryanjuguilon213 Жыл бұрын
I don;t even get why Austria was more powerful than Prussia? Just because of territory? Vienna has tenous hold over various territory as evidence by their failure in Hungary and needing Russia's help. Economically they were eclipsed by Prussia. Excluded from the customs union and does not have anything like the Ruhr industrial district nor even the Silesian industrial area. Coal and iron was the industrial building block of the era. Diplomatically? It was isolated by the Crimean war and its intanglement in Italy and lack of plan in Germany. Ideologically? Thiers is an achaic system of dynastic anddeudal relationship, totally unsuited in the era of nationalism.
@aarongodinez9022 Жыл бұрын
@@ryanjuguilon213 Austria had double the population of Prussia and a very similar GDP per capita. Less Austrians worked in agriculture than Prussians at the time. Austrian weakness is overstated throughout history only because of their inability to survive the most calamitous war in human history (something which Prussia-Germany and Russia also did not survive).
@thunderbird19212 жыл бұрын
A VERY underrated conflict. As a matter of fact, it may be the reason one of my ancestors immigrated to America in 1866 (he was a Prussian from Pomerania, so there has been speculation in our family as to whether he was trying to avoid getting conscripted to fight the Austrians, though we cannot say for sure).
@martinwich8788Күн бұрын
I’d genuinely be curious about my Ancestors’ view, because they were Austrians (although I’m also half- one). At the time both countries were millitaristic and my Family doesn’t have a lot of History of War.
@Harrys_History2 жыл бұрын
Great video, this war needs more coverage. Love that you also split Wilhelmine and Bismarkian Prussia up to. :)
@nickmacarius30122 жыл бұрын
I love the profile picture being used for Bismarck .The Prussian eagle is covered by Bismarck so perfectly that the wings sticking out alongside his head makes it seems as though Bismarck has a rad mullet. 😎👍
@localdissident39032 жыл бұрын
This channel is so underrated. Unbiased, original. And a channel which covers Conflicts and issues completely ignored by mainstream channels
@EmuCavalry Жыл бұрын
0:10, lol did anyone else think he gave Bismark hippy hair a first glance🤣
@fil13752 жыл бұрын
I don't know if this may interest someone, but in Italy is often narrated how Garibaldi, marching towards Trento, received a telegram from the king ordering him to stop because Prussia was urging us to sign the peace, and he answered with one single word:"obbedisco"( I obey) Not the best english i know, i kinda struggled to form this sentence, sorry
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
Ah, yes. There is very nice video about Risogermento on Guido channel, showing Italian view of conflict.
@TheBaldCadaver932 жыл бұрын
Your channel is such a gem, love all your videos. Amazing work.
@nikcladis2 жыл бұрын
This is peak performance work!! I will make some suggestions, you can do other parts of the world like the Scramble of Africa, Russo-Japanese war, USA civil war maybe.
@ErichZornerzfun2 жыл бұрын
Another close run part of the war was the entire South German Campaign. Bavaria, Baden, and Wurttemberg refused to mobilize at the start of the war or even to link up their field armies, they believed Austria would simply win the war on their own and thus the South German princes believed they could just declare war as a show of solidarity. This allowed a small Prussian army of about 50 thousand to defeat the South German armies of over 100 thousand in detail. If those states had mobilized and quickly linked their armies together they could have put up a real second front for the Prussians and prevented the swift occupation of their countries.
@ryanjuguilon213 Жыл бұрын
Ah yes. Those south Germans! Im sure the northerners were quaking in their boots. Just like at Rossbach. Or Wurzburg. Bavaria's last noteworthy performance was during the 80 years war. After that they were just cannon fodder for the French and Austrians. Whichever side they want to lick their ass.
@MonsieurDean2 жыл бұрын
We've got to do one of these together some day.
@thanhhoangnguyen47542 жыл бұрын
i vote for it Monsieur Z Love from alternate history fan in Vietnam
@shellshockedgerman39472 жыл бұрын
Zvallid and whatifalthist is more of your level.
@micahistory2 жыл бұрын
didn't know you watched him too
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
Wow, Mr Z here. Nice to see you watching this great channel too.
@gunagmer12652 жыл бұрын
Yesssss
@StronkyHose2 жыл бұрын
This is a wonderfully informative and not over-explored portion of history (at least as far as KZbin essays are concerned). I really like the direction of this channel and can only hope for more.
@louisiananlord172 жыл бұрын
Love all these pre-WWI videos! You have a keen and pragmatic mind, fellow historian!
@Real_MrDev2 жыл бұрын
The Italian war goals during the war ware largely nationalistic, they served more as propaganda than actual territorial gain, even if the Italian army performed poorly (like any war of independence due the idiocy of the high ranking generals and lack of organization), plus the Italians actually aimed for a larger expansion, not only Veneto, but also the Italian Majority city of Trieste and the Trento region (strange that you show Italy's goal with Bolzen, even if the Italians just wanted the Italian majority Trento.
@gs78282 жыл бұрын
Securing the Alps and thus the peninsula was a strategic objective, still.
@Real_MrDev2 жыл бұрын
@@gs7828 Of course my friend, but it wasn't an objective at that time, they wanted Propoganda not functionality. (Something that will change in the next 30 years)
@eb11842 жыл бұрын
Bozen*
@gs78282 жыл бұрын
@@eb1184 It also got germanised by Austria. Italy was under German domination for centuries.
@gs78282 жыл бұрын
@@Real_MrDev Italian generals had also a say. The Alps are a strategic position, and a natural border. Also, South Tyrol/Alto Adige was Germanised too in the past. Rolling back foreign control of the peninsula passed through that chapter too.
@G3700L2 жыл бұрын
I really love this War aims format you have. It's really intresting to see how things could have benn had the war's gone another way. Also it shows how much you research and actually try to make videos. I can't imagine how hard it is to find this for some countries, keep up the great work!
@flintsrevenge2 жыл бұрын
You have quickly become one of my favorite channels on KZbin keep it coming man this content is superb.
@Runenschuppe2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: This war is taught under the name "German-German war (of 1866)" or less common "German Brothers' War" within Germany.
@bastian1822 жыл бұрын
or just German War
@forthrightgambitia10322 жыл бұрын
Seems a more appropriate name for the Thirty Years' War.
@Runenschuppe2 жыл бұрын
@@forthrightgambitia1032 I don't know if we want to call a war that included France, Spain, Denmark, Sweden and Poland a German-German war...
@Lysimachus2 жыл бұрын
Enjoyable video as always. I'm familiar with the era but there's always something new to discover in your content. I've long wondered about Bismarck's vision in the 1860s, he seemed to see the path ahead for unification and the required steps. For example at 7:07 using the Austro-Prussian War to annex territory would almost certainly have made it harder to make the annexations for the ultimate prize in the form of German unification, so it shows great forethought. Austria could still remain an ally too without any territorial disputes, so again - the vision on display is extroadinary.
@thanhhoangnguyen4754 Жыл бұрын
Just a small problem in the future is that the Austrian prove to be worthless and inconvenient as an ally. I am guessing Bismarck didn't see that kicking the Austrian out of German affairs and left them in charge of a multi ethnic Empire with nationalism on the rise wouldn't be a problem?
@NP3GA2 жыл бұрын
Bismarck really did his homework when it comes to war treaties
@jackoofman25602 жыл бұрын
This is one of the best channels I’ve ever seen. Great work!
@Theodosius_fan2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video again
@Colonial_Chronicle2 жыл бұрын
i really love this, please do the napoleonic wars
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
"If Italians want Trentino and Trieste they could fight on their own"- Bismarck. Italy was dissapointed with such hasty peace, and even more after Venice went to France...
@TacitusSempronius2 жыл бұрын
Maybe Bismarck would have been more inclined towards Italian demands if the Italian army/navy did not perform so badly during the war.
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
@@TacitusSempronius "Italy has great hunger, but bad Teeth" - Bismarck.
@gs78282 жыл бұрын
@@alexzero3736 That's why we needed the Great War to conclude our national unity and irredentism.
@generalfeldmarschall37812 жыл бұрын
@@gs7828 but the Italiens were traitors there
@thanhhoangnguyen4754 Жыл бұрын
@@generalfeldmarschall3781 The Italian allies is basically saying we need your resources and another fronts. Not your fighting capability
@josephb75942 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video! Keep up the good work, your channel is excellent!
@Gregatron139 ай бұрын
I need to make a giant playlist of all of your vids in historical order 😝
@HeWhoLaugths2 жыл бұрын
How do you make your maps? They're beautiful
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Literally just photoshop, and learnt with Dr Ludwig’s tutorial on KZbin, from there it was just trial and error and finding map styles I liked online.
@Davdit2 жыл бұрын
You have some of the best history videos on KZbin. I wish you good luck in future from Romania!
@Neval342122 жыл бұрын
Good job as always 👏 👍.
@joeshmoe83452 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks for sharing your video with us big dog. You done good.
@njalsen Жыл бұрын
Im loving thse videos Especially now that I am playing Vic 3
@bertchintus41032 жыл бұрын
I'm a simple man. I see a new history channel with a competent presenter, I hit subscribe and the bell button.
@Simon_the_penguin9 ай бұрын
Bismarck saying “I’ll resign if I don’t get my way” is similar to a kindergartener saying “you’re not invited to my birthday party anymore”
@vitts11582 жыл бұрын
Make a video about portugal(love your videos)🇵🇹🇵🇹🇵🇹🇵🇹🇵🇹🇵🇹🇵🇹
@StoicHistorian2 жыл бұрын
Another great video
@micahistory2 жыл бұрын
great video as always, I really like your coverage of 19th century european politics tho I would prefer some more british content
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
British content is coming, don't worry.
@brucewilliams62922 жыл бұрын
You do excellent research and videos! Thank you for the great video. Subscribed.
@shaquille.oatmeal.96232 жыл бұрын
Very nice video a video exclusively devoted to napoleon iii and the second French empire would be cool thanks!
@diegonatan63012 жыл бұрын
2:40 to let the Italians just roam free would be stupid, even if the Austrians already agreed to part with the territory, let the Italians come through Veneto would open the way to Viena, it is frankly quite obvious.
@Crump_Hole2 жыл бұрын
This channel is great! If I wasn't heavily in debt I'd give you some money.
@More_Row2 жыл бұрын
We all are in different ways.
@TheBaldCadaver932 жыл бұрын
Hell yes
@overworlder8 ай бұрын
France taking Belgium would be complicated by the treaty commitments that brought Britain into WW1. Although I suppose if the other guarantors, France, Prussia and Russia supported a French claim, there wouldn’t be much Britain and Austria could do.
@Veriox222 жыл бұрын
I love the style of the map in your videos
@paul1780 Жыл бұрын
@oldbritannia will you do a coverage of Italian unification? And or Japanese Industrialization & Empire build up?
@antaridae2 жыл бұрын
5:45: Italy had hoped to also seize Trentino* Trentino is the region of Trento, mainly Italian speaking, South Tyrol is the region of Bozen, mainly German speaking.
@moredac28812 жыл бұрын
Great video, can you explain the Crimean War please? That one has always confused me.
@Shtephen2 жыл бұрын
lets go new war goals video
@nathanjames31022 жыл бұрын
Can't get enough of these video's 👌🏻👏🏻👍🏻😊
@captainez43872 жыл бұрын
I love how you do your maps
@chickenperson75682 жыл бұрын
I love these videos
@Toumahitoedits2 жыл бұрын
aka the "German Brothers War", this war was inevitable after Bismarck declared the German Confederation...dissolved! The Austrians wanted to also unite Germany, but their multiethnicity prevents that. Instead, they would rather maintain the German States rather than Prussia uniting it. Italy's involvement was crucial, their alliance with Prussia spread Austrian Forces thin. Just Bismarck needed to crush them at Koniggratz! "All is Fair in Love and War." -John Lyly
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
This makes me think like Bismarck was alone genius who had real designs for united German states. Why Austria never tried to make German Confederation or even HRE a political entiety?(with or without Prussia). Why Russia, France and UK ( the Entente of 1914) ignored rising of Germany?
@shorewall2 жыл бұрын
From this video, if the Austrians had been quicker in getting rid of Venice to placate France and Italy, maybe things would be different. It also would probably have been a good idea to spin off the Hungarian portion as a separate unit, since it seems that the gridlock between the that the and German portion caused Austria a lot of problems. Guarantee the Lowlands as a buffer state to get France and even GB on board, and just don't lose to Prussia. :D Maybe it's too tall of an order. Bismarck and Prussia really seemed to be in the right place at the right time, or rather, have an understanding of the spirit of the times. They could almost see the future, or just gambled and won. One way or another, it was Prussia's win.
@overworlder8 ай бұрын
As well as Silesia, a logical claim for a victorious Austria would be Prussia’s Catholic territories, which included the lower Rhineland, Munster and Westphalia. Metternich’s consent at the Congress of Vienna to Prussia taking Catholic German territories in the first place seems uncharacteristic of the Habsburgs, as the traditional leaders and defenders of Catholicism in Germany. But Vienna’s urgent need for cash and the rich revenues of northern Italy seemed to outweigh all other considerations.
@HereticalPuppy2 жыл бұрын
how are these maps made? they're so satisfying to look at
@redcheburek23662 жыл бұрын
Hello, I really like your videos, especially their quality. How do manage to make such beautiful maps?)
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Just through Photoshop. Learnt using Dr Ludwig's tutorial on YT. after that just trial and error and finding map styles I liked online.
@golden_smaug2 жыл бұрын
Very cool looking maps
@KevinJonasx112 жыл бұрын
cool video. how do you animate these?
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Just premier pro
@razortheonethelight73032 жыл бұрын
This channel is making me so hyped for Victoria 3 coming out in a few days.
@foodman36952 жыл бұрын
Italy didn't want South Tyrol, it wanted Trento, the majority Italian party of South Tyrol. It also wanted Istria. Also, while the Italians lost at the start of the war they quickly picked up and conquered most of Venetia by the end of the war
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
My Source for South Tyrol is AJP Taylor. I couldn’t find anything about Istria myself, but I’m happy to accept the correction nonetheless.
@foodman36952 жыл бұрын
@@OldBritannia It's fine, I love your videos and how detailed they are! P.S: To clarify Istria more, while I don't believe they publicly made an announcement but if the war prolonged and they fully conquered Venetia, Istria would probably be added (Or atleast the Italian majority cities like Triest and Rijeka (Back then Fiume)
@gs78282 жыл бұрын
South Tyrol is part of the peninsula and makes sense to defend the Brenner Pass, closing the entrance from Austria. Also, historically the Italian peninsula had always been portrayed in the Roman province of Italia and the Brenner Pass was part of historical Italy, Germanised later. Italy had, indeed, been dominated by foreign powers for centuries, but after the Great War the country finally concluded its national unity and control over its peninsula.
@foodman36952 жыл бұрын
@@OldBritannia Also I have a recommendation for a future video, "War aims of states during the American civil war" At first it seems boring because it's only US and Slave owners but looking at it more deeply and how stuff like cook county seceding from Tennesse or West Virginia being created, and that's not even talking about the British proposal to hand over Canada to the US if they stopped the civil war.
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
@@foodman3695 I hadn't considered doing one on the Civil War, but that actually sounds like a really interesting idea. Perhaps I could even sneak in a section on Maximilian's Mexico. I shall add it to the list.
@BenjaminMellor2 жыл бұрын
What if you did videos on the war aims of each nation in the Franco-Prussian War and World War II?
@BenjaminMellor2 жыл бұрын
My comment got hearted, but the heart got removed due to me fixing a typo.
@mellon4251 Жыл бұрын
On the picture here Bismarck always looks like he has a completely crazy haircut while in fact these things are only the feathers of the Prussian eagle behind him😄
@imgvillasrc16082 жыл бұрын
2:48 hard disagree. Austria winning meant all Germans would have been united and Germany would be under the House that has led all German states for centuries even before the baltic Prussian state existed.
@tiringsarcasm2 жыл бұрын
And that gave them the right to win because??? They point of that comment was to point out the stupidity of the decision to send a large force to the Italians for land they had already agreed to give up, he said that they deserved to lose because if they just pulled back to the alps or better yet just told the Italians they were giving up Venetia then they would have had a far better chance of winning. Instead they did what Austria has always done sent brave soldiers to die because of incompetent leadership. Also the Hapsburgs only came to power as Emperor at 1453, the Prussians would be founded in 1525, only around 2 generations later. So to say the Hapsburgs lead all the German states for centuries before they were founded is incredibly hyperbolic considering not even a century has passed since the Prussian state formed. In fact your statement becomes even more ridiculous if you include the Teutonic order who preceded the Prussians and pretty much laid the groundwork for Germans in Prussia when they took over in 1283. Which is around the same time that the Hapsburgs took control of the Dutch of Austria at 1246. Both states had the history, power, and prestige to take over Germany, which is why the war had to be fought to decide it.
@imgvillasrc16082 жыл бұрын
@@tiringsarcasm The Habsburg's had the right to rule Germany because they had always been Germans while the Prussians are originally people from the Baltics and only became German when they had a personal union with Brandenburg. The first Habsburg ruler was Rudolf I who was King of the Germans from 1273. That technically means the Habsburg's ruled Germany for centuries before the Prussians. You can't lump Prussia and the Teutonic Order with the same history, that's like saying the Mongol Empire existed until the 18th century cause of their successors the Mughal's. Main point I was making that a Habsburg victory meant a truly united Germany instead of the two Germanies we have now.
@duwang84992 жыл бұрын
@@imgvillasrc1608 Habsburg are cringe and incompetent. No thanks.
@tiringsarcasm2 жыл бұрын
@@imgvillasrc1608 Hm, I suppose if the goal was true unification than a Hapsburg victory would make sense. Although it would be far far more difficult considering the pressure that the Hungarians would put on them because of it. The main reason they never unified before this was because the Hungarians would protest against adding anymore ethnic Germans to their empire, so it would likely become a loose confederation rather than one country.
@gabri-immortale2 жыл бұрын
They true unification is the one made by sicilian nobility under the house of Hohenstaufen
@anthonytillman63637 ай бұрын
4:20 a buffer state? Napoleon III must not have been a very good negotiator. Austria and Prussia probably would have conceded the Left Bank of the Rhine, territory that France had occupied for some 20 years during the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars, if France had pushed hard for it. Immediately after the battle of Konigratz, for example, if Napoleon III had approached Prussia, and threatened to enter the War on Austria's side, Prussia would likely have had no choice but to make concessions to France.
@pilum37052 жыл бұрын
Have you considered doing one for the Congress of Vienna?
@williamtoner86742 жыл бұрын
I think he did
@somehistorynerd2 жыл бұрын
Already did I think
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
My Castlereagh biography briefly covers it, though from a narrow perspective. At some point yes I’d love to.
@rpan17382 жыл бұрын
Historia Civilis has a good video on it
@pilum37052 жыл бұрын
@@rpan1738 Oh yes, that’s why I am asking in the first place. Historia Civilis Video is Great but also very detailed and lengthy. A compressed version with maybe more precise mapping and more focus on claims than political relations might be interesting as well.
@JustAColombian2 жыл бұрын
Hi there Britannia, I have some friends who love you content and are promoting a historical game based on tanks from WWII. They would love to work with you and offer a sponsor but cant find your email for contact. Could you share it with me or tell me where to find it so they can contact you?
@fite-4-ever8762 жыл бұрын
The Prussian eagle behind Bismarck makes it look like he has a shaggy mullet
@bobbertrobbert62822 жыл бұрын
May someone explain to me the German border with Denmark changing at 7:32?
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Ah, that's a mistake on my part. Simply forgot to match that border between layers in photoshop. Apologies, when one deals with so many maps, lots of little mistakes like this unfortunately creep through lol.
@bobbertrobbert62822 жыл бұрын
No need to apologize. I was wondering if it was just a mistake but if it wasn't I wanted to go ahead and ask because it probably would have been hard to find any information on such a small border change.
@gabrielvicuna97342 жыл бұрын
Are you the same guy from History matters? Voice is quite similar?
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Haha, I’m afraid not.
@poiuyt975 Жыл бұрын
It took two world wars not only to remove the Prussian threat to Europe, but also to remove the spirit of Prussian militarism from the German culture. I tend to believe that the world would've been a better place, if Prussia had lost the Seven Years War, although that's a different debate.
@goldenproductions78312 жыл бұрын
Can you maybe raise the volume of ur videos?
@fritoss34372 жыл бұрын
I guess you Will do the same with the franco prussian war ?
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
I should think so yes.
@PossibleTango2 жыл бұрын
With Victoria 3 coming out more of the 19th century wars would be awesome!
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
They actually removed wars
@PossibleTango2 жыл бұрын
@@alexzero3736 ??
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
there are streams on paradox channel about Victoria 3, you can watch gameplay...
@PossibleTango2 жыл бұрын
@@alexzero3736 Wars are not removed which is why I put ??. Wars just got reworked. Honestly it's not even that bad, better than the Vic2 system that became a clusterfuck in the late game. I don't want to have to micromanage a huge army and a have to micromanage my economy at the same time.
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
But they made it all like border conflicts in Hoi, thats boring...also there no single animation, no units...
@SirFaceFone2 жыл бұрын
Prussia annexing more Austrian territories is a really interesting alt history. They probably would've ended up as bitter as France was.
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
France, Russia and probably UK would disagree with such move and would put pressure on Prussia to give those lands back.
@yeetusdeletus84892 жыл бұрын
I beg of you, Do something on France, maybe the Belle Epoque, the Dreyfus affair, So many possiblities!
@a_channel25452 жыл бұрын
Video idea: What percentage of 19th century European history can be summarized as “Bismarck did a thing”?
@Agent-cz9rj2 жыл бұрын
The Iron Chancellor United all German states to form the Unification of Germany 1871 and the formation of The German Empire in 1871 the same year. Otto Bismarck First Chancellor Of Germany 1871 - 1890.
@vexxofficialaccount2 жыл бұрын
Make a discord server?
@therealoldnosey86892 жыл бұрын
please turn the audio up in your videos ❤️
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I agree it’s on the quiet side. Will endeavour to next time.
@stevenhumkid18502 жыл бұрын
I Like now and watch later. Greetings from the old Germany
@exterminans2 жыл бұрын
Glorious. I am a medievalist and don't care much for the modern period but I do have a thing for post-Napoleonic 19th century and new imperialism.
@fusionreactor71792 жыл бұрын
Imagine caring about irrelevant mud eaters
@belewerd96722 жыл бұрын
As I would like there to be a channel like that with videos in Spanish
@gideonhorwitz94342 жыл бұрын
One of the historical choices that baffles me was piedmont Sardinia choice to give savoy to France even though it was the ancestral seat of the future Italian royal family the literal house of savoy now no longer in their hands. It’s the equivalent of the British royal family putting Windsor castle up for sale even though there the house of bloody Windsor.Even until the end the Hapsburgs still held ownership of their ancestral estates in Switzerland. So other than the fact they would permanent reside in Rome after Italian unification why did the house of Savoy give up Savoy?
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
It was a demand from Napoleon 3," you give me Savoy and Nice wich were part of the French Empire, and i give you troops and letting you have your Little Italy". ( funny that Napoleon proposed Italy as confederation, with Rome staying under Pope forever...). Actually freeing of Venice also was promised to Cavour...Btw capital was in Florence until 1871.
@marcusmagni2 жыл бұрын
The old name of the windsors it's Hannover, I don't see them owning territory in Germany right now. Owning Italy was far more worthy than owning an obscure province on the other side of the Alps
@Vaultboy-ke2jj2 жыл бұрын
Bismarck at 0:10 rocking a mullet
@ЙованДобройевичь2 жыл бұрын
myb war aims of each nation in first Balkan war?
@thewise35512 жыл бұрын
@0:13 Otto was rocking that mullet. Ahead of his time.
@yasineren56972 жыл бұрын
Can u do Greco-Ottoman war 1897
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Yes, definitely on the list
@yasineren56972 жыл бұрын
@@OldBritannia Awsome!
@EETDUK2 жыл бұрын
Was the audio really quiet for anyone else? Great vid otherwise
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I agree it is on the quiet side, audio in general is something I am still figuring out.
@BeWe15102 жыл бұрын
Napolen III is sometimes over hated in my opinion. Until 1866 he wasn’t all that bad, the restructuring of Paris and the Crimean War, in which France was definitely a beneficiary, are examples of that. But oh boy was he outplayed by Bismarck. I mean everyone was tbf, but no one was outplayed this hard
@nouhowlmao28092 жыл бұрын
The crimean war was literally wortless
@thanhhoangnguyen4754 Жыл бұрын
@@nouhowlmao2809 and the Napoleon III just keep pressuring the Ottoman for their goal which also hampered their mordenization. Which caused them to be unable to keep up if the Russian back again. Either Way i more support for the Ottoman if it the only way to keep the Balkan under control. The Balkan since the Ottoman left had been but catalyst for World War 1.
@explodingwolfgaming80242 жыл бұрын
Commenting 4 algorithm
@RedcoatHistory-gj7xf7 ай бұрын
Prussian eagal behind Bismarck's head makes him look like a native American shaman
@christophermacintosh59282 жыл бұрын
Moree MOREEEEE!!!
@23rdMS_Inf2 жыл бұрын
Bismarck rockin a mullet
@merwthegreat2 жыл бұрын
i kinda want saxony but its aight yall can keep it
@joemamma21202 жыл бұрын
And another Video, in which The Term South Tirol was used wrong: At that time and untill 1915, the Italians (with a few extremist Polititions which had little to no influence) were not interested on taking the german speaking South Tirol, but only the part of Tirol, which is even more southern than South Tirol, called Trentino, which had and has in fact a italian majority. The Idea of annexing the exclusively German speaking South Tirol cane up, when the allies offered italy these Lands. So don'tbe stupid and recognise, that South Tirol should belong to austria and not Italy
@Syncronoise2 жыл бұрын
I do wonder, is there any evidence that Napoleon III was worried about other nations fearing a replication of the other Napoleon. It might explain the procrastination perhaps?
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
Nah. There are different evidence, Napoleon 3 never considered Austria as friend. In Crimean war Austria was neutral, in Italo- Austrian war of 1860 French troops attacked Austrians with Napoleon himself...
@Syncronoise2 жыл бұрын
@@alexzero3736 does that not prove my point or at least justify why he was so complacent to opportunity? The original Napoleon was very opportunistic and the world banded against him. It’s entirely possible he might have had an inadequacy issue over that. He might not wanted to have gone as far as the original Napoleon, but in doing so he shot way under the mark.
@OldBritannia2 жыл бұрын
There's definitely an element of that. In particular he was concerned about provoking Britain's ire. But in general he was just one of life's procrastinators in Foreign Policy, with not much in the way of ulterior explanation.
@Syncronoise2 жыл бұрын
@@OldBritannia fair enough, the Bonapartes were always seemingly were secret admirers of Britain haha; and in some cases, like with the 4th, seemingly more British than French.
@EdbertWeisly2 жыл бұрын
I wonder, What if Austria and Prussia Stalemated?
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
They Did, no?
@EdbertWeisly2 жыл бұрын
@@alexzero3736 hmm, I need to re write the comment
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
Well, Bismarck was afraid about any major country interference, as war drags longer those probability is growing...i guess the result would be Status Quo and diplomacy would be escalated to International conference like Congress of Vienna, Bismarck and other Prussian leaders would be dissapointed that Germans are not deciding the future of Germany alone. The most likely outcome would be that German federation would split, allies of Prussia would be allowed to join It s federation, while others would stay in confederation under Austrian leadership. Venice would be given to Italy anyway. So, basically German unification would be stalled by 5-10 years. And south Germany like Bavaria, Baden, Wurtemburg may create their own little South German Federation.(With Austrian or French backing)
@Hannover_zur_Ehr2 жыл бұрын
Interesting video. But Austria should have won. Prussias rule of Germany caused its downfall
@bakthihapuarachchi34472 жыл бұрын
If France entered the Austro Prussian War, do you think Prussia would still have been able to win?
@alexzero37362 жыл бұрын
Actually it was a matter of time, such fast Austrian defeat was unexpected. So French declaration of war wont change much, as Bismarck offered peacedeal in hasty manner and with limited demands, not taking any piece of Austria itself.
@savagedarksider59342 жыл бұрын
Bismarck have A plan. Bismarck always have A plan.