The Weirdest Stars in the Universe

The Weirdest Stars in the Universe
Emily Levesque, University of Colorado
How big can a star get? Why would a star only PRETEND to explode? Can you hide one star inside another? During this talk Dr. Levesque will take you on a tour of some of the weirdest stars in the universe, from our nearest neighbors to stars more than 13 billion light years away. She will discuss the history of stellar astronomy, delve into about some present-day observing techniques and exciting new discoveries, and explore some of the most puzzling and exotic objects being studied by astronomers today.
Hosted by Dr. Frank Summers. Recorded live on June 2, 2015 at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, MD, USA
For more information: hubblesite.org/about_us/public...

[@gil10601]

Emily Levesque is a terrific speaker , I hope I can find more of her lectures. Five Star talk !

[@nobodyknows3180]

I once had a girlfriend whom I lovingly referred to as My Little Neutron Star. She'd always used to gush and giggle. Then one day she asked me, "Is it because I'm so incredibly bright?" "Nope, it's cuz you're so incredibly dense!" Talk about going supernova.

[@aaronshih8369]

Thank you Dr. Emily Levesque on your fascinating lecture on supergiant stars !! Excellent speech !!

[@josephkarpinski9586]

Excellent talk! Great presentation and amount of scientific data, explained at a level, that the public can understand. Wish there was a link, to a PDFs of the foils presented in the talk, as well as detail notes on each foil. Loved the talk!!!

[@pamelal7487]

This is my first video in this series and I must say it is a wonderful accident that I should be introduced to the series via such an excellent speaker with and fascinating topic. Well done Dr. Levesque. I'm off now to find more videos.

[@mikeglass5735]

Great talk. I really enjoyed it.

[@henkmuntslag506]

A great Hubble cosmology lecture delivered in very understandable language!

[@SSArt98]

+Henk Muntslag Took the words out of my mouth! _One of my favorite lecture so far this year!_

[@VeN0m88]

Hey Henk, always good to see you !!!

[@flatearth7838]

Ya the language of deception!

[@renukote]

Henk Muntslag earth is not a spinning. search Sophia telescope on a 747. our earth is stationary and flat

[@marsmo69]

stupid you are

[@fz1000red]

Dr. Levesque delivers a great deal of information in a short amount of lecturing. It's all fascinating stuff to study and learn about. Even the uber eccentric intro-professor was pretty okay. ;)~

[@FranklyTheSeeker1982]

fascinating real science video about astrophysic with informations even I as a astrophysics/cosmology-fan since ~1992 never heard from ;)

[@Medosten]

This was a very fascinating lector. Thanks for hosting it online.

[@anonbra2145]

yea cool lecture, to bad it's all fake though. made me rather sad.

[@themightychabunga2441]

Yeah, this must be a trick of thuh devul! And you anon bra are a invisible purple unicorn that eats human babies.

[@jellymop]

I too enjoyed the Lector. He was nice in that one movie.

[@partypoet2012]

@@themightychabunga2441 I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@krashdown5814]

@@partypoet2012 Pretty lame Mark, you come back nearly three years later looking to see if any of your FEN's are still following the ways of your cult, Elon's put a big dent into their beliefs.

[@polger33]

Thank you for all the information. It is very enlightening.

[@onenotused9327]

I absolutely enjoyed this lecture and so THANK YOU for posting this. Thank you to everyone who dedicated time and effort into this!!!

[@seenathpanchowrie2425]

my sentiments exactly.

[@partypoet2012]

@@seenathpanchowrie2425 I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@jcmac7709]

Dr Summers kicks ass - super entertaining. Dr Levesque is out there for sure lol. Great presentation doc.

[@jaylondon83]

Great lecture - thank you for sharing

[@UKAlanR]

Watch out for the deafening soundburst around 1:19:45! The sound engineer has tried to make it possible for the recording to pick up audience questions, but rather than learned, barely-audible grey-hairs the sound is of a well-deserved and hearty round of applause that smashes out of your headphones as a YT listener! Dr Levesque covers this subject superbly, displaying a vast knowledge across numerous areas of astronomy that make fascinating viewing.

[@micahchaney1904]

LMBO!!! If we were in the path of a gamma-ray burst...we wouldn't get a warning, so don't worry about it. WOW!!! That earned a thumbs up. Fantastic video!

[@basknation]

She did this talk at the Perimeter Institute last march I think it was. She answered a question I sent in of what happens to the original core of the Red Supergiant / TZO once, or as, the neutron star took over. She is a terrific communicator

[@abcdef2069]

at 39:08, what is the mass ratio before and after a super nova? how much gets flung out and how much to become a neutron star or a black hole?

[@pamelagailjorgensen6543]

Thank You!

[@pimveldhuijzen969]

thanks a lot for this enlightening lecture,. Really really enjoid it.

[@DenisClips]

Excellent talk!!! Thank you. :)

[@samuelvelazquez6319]

Suckers....there is a dome up there you cannot get past it with a space vehicle or even look out past that. When the great deception comes with the lie of alien hoards You people will be ripe for being deceived. Jesus is your anchor to reality in this life and the king James version of the bible is the only one that can be fully trusted. The consequences are severe. Choose heaven or hell!

[@partypoet2012]

@@samuelvelazquez6319 I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@Psalm1968]

Love the combination of her passion, zeal and knowledge. Infectious. Makes me want to live in a telescope. :)

[@ellenblais6822]

Thank you. Love your lectures

[@jeevanshudhawan]

A great lecture! Even a layman can understand every bit of it. Thanks.

[@IIoveasl10]

Fascinating!

[@keithirvine1]

In the future could you please advise your guests how to handle their microphones? Very interesting subject, partially spoiled by the constant thumping of the mike....very irritating.........thks very much....

[@robinswamidasan]

Totally agree. It's really bad.

[@pootdaggy2657]

Very fine lecture. On the whole I'd say the lenticularis of iridium interacting with molybdenum is proof of the existence of at least a stylized representation of a star, typically one having five or more points.

[@djglutamatergic]

Emily and I were hallmates at MIT -- and boy how I wish I'd prodded her mind on these topics back then! Congrats Emily on your successes! "Slugfest" for life :)

[@vistachris9999]

This talk gets epic around 1:05:00 I was really surprised about this discovery and wonder where else I can learn about it. Was good until then - and then the excitement really kicked in. Thanks for sharing as always.

[@dancrane3807]

Thanks, I was about to downcheck and end this.

[@partypoet2012]

@@dancrane3807 I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@daryljohnson9553]

just curious is it measured at its predicted surface or atmosphere? sorry if that sounds dumb, weird I'm just interested to the idea of what they're doing!

[@eribertoacedo9505]

Thank you Emily great lecture really enjoyed it🕶”

[@edsmith2562]

Wonderful lecture. Check this out? At about 24:30 what if anything changed? Ok, I made screenshots and toggled from 24:55 to 25:05, I saw the samples line up mostly above 3.5K. Still, I see no remarkable difference. If you exclude 6 or 7 extremes, all are within about 250F, well less than 5%.

[@segura2112]

This was very good, but I wish I could've heard the questions the audience asked instead of just the answers.

[@MrViewer57]

Excelent!!

[@spacegalaxiesplanetsastron344]

great video

[@Jcole000123]

Thank You, Sir. Not afraid to admit my lack of genius. This was the first simple explanation of gravitational lensing

[@basknation]

Yea, write a paper and go collect your Nobel prize.

[@partypoet2012]

@Ed Sev I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@nickmad887]

loved it

[@sg2massive]

What is going on with the mic i couldn't watch all of this which was a shame .

[@SnowblindOtter]

For something done in 2015, they didn't even touch on VY_Canis Majoris(the largest star ever discovered PERIOD.), and Direct-Collapse Black Hole Candidates(where a star implodes so hard that the event-horizon of the black hole envelops the whole thing instantly.).

[@SolaceEasy]

Could a super giant star be penetrated repeatedly by a neutron star in an orbit around the center of mass of the supergiant star? Your model of a TZO implies a very perfect hit. I would think the chances are higher of irregular, erratic orbits leading to final Central emplacement. Something not dissimilar from the models of two galaxies of different sizes coalescing.

[@inevitablecraftslab]

loving it but without a pop-filter or at least a compressor its unwatchable with headphones

[@seagullman8307]

1:20:15 AN HOUR?!!!! Where is my popcorn!

[@gorkie6998]

half of spectators is about to go supernova, any day now...

[@Justin_Martin]

This video is awesome 🇺🇸👑💕

[@duonghero]

This is the right theory of cosmic formation @32xk

[@invisible_d_r]

39:20 Teaspoon of neutron stars weight more than mountain Everest Wow

[@nickc247]

Was there an old person section and a young person section in the audience? 😆

[@BlackEpyon]

Regarding GRBs. Would the supernova burst be produced by the accretion near the event horizon?

[@BlackEpyon]

***** Ah. I gotta watch the thing again so I remember what we were talking about.

[@partypoet2012]

@@BlackEpyon I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@BlackEpyon]

@@partypoet2012 I don't recall, though I could be wrong, that anybody had attempted to get measurements on the distances to the stars until Christiaan Huygens, based on intrinsic brightness. That experiment assumed that each star had an identical intrinsic brightness as the sun, which they don't. But I'll give him points for the effort, because if he knew the intrinsic brightness of the stars, he'd have been pretty much spot on considering this instruments were his own eyeballs and a brass disk with holes drilled in it. We'd be dealing with some pretty funky day/night cycles, and a lack of Coriolis forces, if the sun were small and closer to the earth. Besides, the experiment produced a figure for the circumference of the earth. He was about 900 miles off, but still pretty good considering he was using eyeballs and human-foot measured stadia (neither of which are consistent), instead of more modern instrumentation. You can use the same measurement over the poles instead of the equator, and it still comes pretty close, but that would NOT be the case if the Earth were flat. So no, that doesn't work. Earth is round. Get over it.

[@partypoet2012]

I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers too?

[@partypoet2012]

@Ed Sev ladies and gentlemen I would like you to pay close attention to how a professional Nasa shill steers you in the wrong direction by omitting at least half the BS in that experiment , so if you don't mind my good man would you mind, filling in all the details not just a quick overview of this Insanity that we had to believe for the next thousand freaking years ..if it's so goddamn important would you mind including pretty words like they used the horizon which flat-earthers called the land far far away also can you please tell me, by knowing two angles ,how you get actual distances, this is where the story should start!! , I would like to hear pretty words like parallax *and I would like that word explained* , show the all the folks ,,who will be reading your reply..so all can understand the insanity you are trying to project by the way a recent attachment in the Flat Earth Community ,I'm pretty sure it's about to go viral is this the science that you want me to believe on a side note?? Vsauce --its a ball but Science proves nothin kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZPGZqeEndGHrdU

[@blackdog.6398]

Thank you 🙏 guys I really like it ... I’m a star child . So I can say your Truly blessed in what you know ...and do a gift , Knowledge that you give some too hold for the rest of their lives ....and to gaze through he infante beauty of the Universe is the wonders of the stars ⭐️ and moons, I would love to be there too see it myself look through some of the most beautiful scoops in the world from the Vaticans devils looking glass to the massif sound of South America ,to SETI, and watch the 15 dishes swing around of the Alain telescope Aray.....Thank You all for the talk and the guest today .the good Doctor from Colorado Springs she failed to tell everyone we’re at 6856ft above sea level and and to look out over Colorado from PIKES PEAK is another beautiful place to gaze out over the world you can see the pitch and arch of the land ..you can see some of it from the live Cams that are at 114.110.ft. It’s massive to look on ... by far a beauty of its own.....Thank You again....keithy out ..

[@robertthayer5779]

Black holes...so strong..light can't escape...?so what are the jets? Stronger than a black hole? Please explain.....

[@abcdef2069]

at 18:00 so ursa minor looks like a big dipper. which made me confused

[@ottolehikoinen6193]

Talk @ 13:00

[@richardhogan7187]

I thought Alice Cooper would make a showing. Thanks

[@alorahendershot7264]

same

[@JeanJonethal]

Have you ever tried to connect gamma ray observatory with a space based telescope in real time?

[@jonharson]

"Swift just pointed at North Korea again." "Dammit Kim stop wasting our fuel!"

[@marloenriquez75]

Can a TZO still go supernova?

[@MrJdsenior]

Wow, excellent talk. A binary star system with one star INSIDE the other. That is freakin COOL! Will have to do some research and keep up with that study.

[@groomlake51]

She is so dreamy 😲

[@segura2112]

Is there an upper limit on how much mass can absorb a companion star?

[@mannys9130]

Yes, the TOV limit.

[@deniseclegg4142]

I reckon the cave painting just shows the stone was cut by the night shift

[@deniseclegg4142]

largest stars,tzos, great lectures, all in a decade's work for this astronomer.......

[@gutterball10]

TZO FTW!

[@TheALIMARS]

Every so often, audio jumps ahead.....

[@sclogse1]

I wonder how we've determined how long our sun has before it gets rowdy.

[@robinswamidasan]

From its mass mainly, and also from the elements present in its outer layers. The mass of a star is indicative of how fast it will burn its fuel, and therefore how long it can sustain nuclear fusion to forestall gravitational collapse. The elements detected in the Sun are typical of the main sequence -- ~ 85% H, 15% He, some trace of other elements.

[@soreliprick]

Your arms move real dreamy!

[@metaspherz]

Some stars might be weird but how weird is life? The vastness of the Universe is mind boggling. It's hard to wrap my mind around the sheer numbers of galaxies that must exist 360 degrees around the tiny speck that we live on. Every one of those galaxies must have life or have had life that existed. We humans are fortunate to exist now and we're learning more about the Universe every day. Hey, we might have existed for just a million plus years but we're still the only intelligent land living species as far as we know, thus far. And despite the speculation of extraterrestrial lifeforms visiting us, we are the only intelligent life form -- that is proven to exist NOW. But how unique are we really? As a species we've come pretty late to the show. How many intelligent lifeforms have come and gone in the Universe since the beginning of time? How many space going cultures have explored other worlds for countless millions of years and then just became extinct, leaving no trace of their existence? How long will it take the human race to flourish, take to the stars and then vanish forever? We're just finding out now that entire civilizations might have existed on earth and then vanished long before our most recent ancestors discovered fire. How long will we survive? Indeed, a million years from now a new crop of humans or other sentient beings might rise up out of our ashes and wonder what happened to our lost civilization....

[@coffeefish]

This is no better than "Stars 101."

[@deananderson9543]

coffeefish Do you have a Degree in Astro Physics or Astronomy?????? If not, the only reason you are complaining about it, is because you simply dont understand any thing she said...

[@coffeefish]

Dean Anderson It would have made a nice lecture for little children or elderly folks in assisted living.

[@jimmyheb]

+coffeefish these are free public lectures aimed at the 'general public'. The lectures are supposed to be accessible to people who have an interest, but not necessarily an in depth level of knowledge/understanding/background in astrophysics. Part of their objective is to [quote] "share with [us] the grace and beauty of the universe, because the discoveries belong to all of us" (check their website for the info). If you want lectures at a higher academic level (= also less accessible to the general public), enroll in a university and pay the due tuition.

[@coffeefish]

jimmyheb This was no "after school special." When an MIT doctoral candidate gives a straight up lecture in a lecture hall, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a little more than fluff.

[@jimmyheb]

coffeefish  May I suggest basing your expectations on what the senders themselves say they intend to do? Otherwise expectations usually become precursor to disappointment. I repeat my suggestion to read their website and you will find exactly what they intend to do with these lectures. I do not know what you intend to say with the comparison to an 'after school special'. I could assume a lot, but assumptions all too often lead to massive f-ups. So I won't. Emily Levesque is not a doctoral candidate, she has her PhD, which she received at the University of Hawaii in 2010. And having a PhD doesn't mean you can or should only give lectures at a high academic level. In my opinion she did a fantastic job at enthusiastically presenting a lecture that is accessible to the general public. Exactly as the Space Telescope Science Institute say they intend to do with their public lecture series. You could give them some constructive feedback by telling them what you would like to hear, but I believe that in this particular case they were rightfully guided by their stated intent and not necessarily by your expectations.

[@soldtobediers]

From the habit of holding every thought and action captive to mind of the Creator, Who'd set long ago all the stars into their past & future perspective rhymes. This scripture; just one of many such in the scriptures, seems to coin this subject on stars the best. Hebrews 12:29 For our God is a consuming fire. Great obligement for the revealments Emily & Frank. 1:08:22 ''Even your thoughts are dust'' -Lucinda Williams song ''Dust'' kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHuYoKGFqt5md5o ''The Creator's (Dust to Dust) policy; don't waste nuthin'.'' -me 121519 1:18:47 That particular eclipse my Son & I had witnessed 5 miles outside of it's width path; bees returning to their bee crates as if it were at sundown. Also the cicadas which were sounding off had stopped their song. The shadows of the leaves were appearing on the ground as if doubled like shadowed lettering.

[@mikewillis44]

waving her hands around like she is on speed kncking the dam mic all the ------time crazy

[@onenotused9327]

michael willis I love her :)

[@mikewillis44]

THATS GREAT BUT ASK HER TO STOP SCRUCHING THE MIC

[@partypoet2012]

@@mikewillis44 I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@bradleyshimels9424]

At least you didn't say the weirdest sfars in Hollywood!

[@christopherreed2694]

She is a great speaker and very beautiful but her brain 🧠😍♥

[@riskyfap8416]

All I heard was Anna Shitcough 58: 47

[@sunspotst7697]

How does gravity pull so much hydrogen together to create a star 1billion miles in diameter???

[@abcdef2069]

at 8:00, where are the 4 views? you need to point them

[@carljhirst]

WELL, an Alien once told me....." theres a Black hole inside every thing. They work collectively. Bigger the object, bigger the pull. Basically, everything has an event horizon. The closer they are, the closer they are, to the same moment or event. Within every Proton is ENTANGLEMENT. " I saw a strange chart showing an Entanglement spectrum. Like a Periodic table. Am I crazy? Did I really see A Proton Entanglement Scanner. Each Focus node worked in pairs to focus on anything and mirror its composition, at infinite distance. And this he said was very very basic. Then told me, my consciousness is like a Radio wave emanation. How scared was I?

[@Deathadder90]

Take the meds.

[@mannys9130]

Yes, you are crazy... That whole comment is gibberish and nonsensical word soup.

[@andrepostler7150]

15 people in the room and another 300,000 coming from the web.

[@stephenmwyatt2]

You can't be cocky when you are new

[@mannys9130]

Wrong.

[@ChgoKurt]

They are looking in the opposite direction if they really want to know what is going on.

[@theestimator]

It's guy's like this that put ordinary people OFF astonomy. Bring back professor Brian plz

[@jijzer3284]

burning ??

[@paalmuruganantham1457]

Okay thanks 🙏 for all 🙏 Great good 💐 💐 💐

[@BarryObama666]

A little complicated for a speech but i dont know the audience. And no one gets "time" on a telescope like that unless they have a family member or very close friend that's working at the observatory.

[@mannys9130]

Uh, what? Researchers apply for "time" on a telescope and are awarded it or denied from it. Everyone takes turns using different observatories for things they wish to analyze.

[@lurking0death]

I wish you guys would spare me all the Disney-escque bright upbeat clever banter and get to the God Damn facts.

[@qbert7985]

Hardly anyone in the audience

[@partypoet2012]

@@anthonydavella8350 I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@zilvinasaleksandravicius7091]

Guys you doing big since, but your record the sound quality is very poor

[@jonsmithcpo]

Is this dude Andy from The Office?

[@siulseyer8053]

You don’t need to import any speakers with this lady’s caliber.

[@fjames208]

Ok

[@jgalt155]

Ceres stuff .

[@angelia1123]

Where were the young?

[@JithinJose2]

Why so many seats are empty

[@partypoet2012]

@@anthonydavella8350 I have a lot of questions about the origins of astronomy,, do you know much about the time when a guy decided to map out the Stars he could see, based on the ratio of how far away they are from the Sun ..and if you know anything that, do you know how he was able to get actual distances based on the ratios,, my problem is there's a presupposition , that this is being done off of a spinning ball , which was presupposed by a fella that I called air n stocks in his knees... and the question I have with the experiment of sticking sticks in the ground ,,are you aware that even way back when, it was stated that this could have been done or represents, *either a flat plain* and the sun being very close , or a ball and the sun being very far both examples provide the same results of course I don't remember hearing anything about the sun being close ever being taught in school, do you know anything about these little fun facts.. that I'm seeking answers to

[@partypoet2012]

@@anthonydavella8350 you want me to check out comets, I would like you to check out the fact that Halley's Comet is going backwards to the direction we're moving in.. and yet it keeps showing up every 75 years can you answer that question.. you have heard of Halley's Comet right,,

[@partypoet2012]

@@anthonydavella8350 if you're a ball boy ,if you believe in the ball, I can help you by asking questions that do not fit the ball model and just like me ,after you realize there are no answers because you don't live on a ball it's something you're going to have to figure out for yourself ..all I know is that you're talkin about a big bright light that we can see up in our sky.. I'm not going to argue with that fact, I'm going to argue with the conclusions that you draw from that fact... because if I had to chalk up the fact that our solar system it's just a bunch of Lights and the astronomy section of our world it's saying we have never ever used actual science to determine the solar system nobody in the field ever uses the scientific method and to boot astronomy is allowed to be off by a factor of 10 to 120 and if that's allowed you can say anything you want ..you can say things like when astronauts went to the Moon there was a delay in the radio of about a second and a half in either direction but the folks on the ISS who are much much closer have a time delay off 5 Seconds in either direction of course any normal person would not be able to explain this until you apply, that you are allowed to screw up by a factor of 10 ^ 120 and everybody will tell you , when Felix Baumgartner, jumped he reached a terminal velocity higher then a hundred fifty miles an hour which by the way is the highest or fastest a human being can fall to our planet, no matter how high up that person is,, this is something called terminal velocity ,,you can't go any faster.. the laws that govern our planet, until you apply our science can be off by a factor of 10 ^ 120 and then everything works out ,..and if you apply that logic why can you not *say you live on a perfectly flat plane that has a radius* , imagine you could satisfy everybody and if some ball boy goes how can you have a radius on plane plain ??the answer will always be , if you apply our screw up Factor of 10 ^ 120 everything works out ,,so can I have you become a flat earther and we will still give you a radius on our Flat Earth, that's not rotating but it can be if you multiply our speed by Factor of 10 ^ 120 it all works out.. what do you say we practice Michio Kaku's rules of astronomy?? just think how beautiful you are model would be.. you can say things like coriolis does not have to work for airplanes , drones and helicopters but it can work like a charm for bullets and pendulums and anytime anybody questions it ,,you just have to say we can screw up by a factor of 10 ^ 120.. everybody in science will get straight A's every single answer you right down cannot possibly be outside the realm of the screw up Factor.. why can't we put forward Weird Science you want to live on a flat plane or a ball.. it works just the same ..and it conforms to All the known laws in our universe ,, *who needs the scientific method if you want to make everybody happy* let's call it... the American dream because it only works if you stay asleep also if anybody says are you crazy, you can't be off by 10 to a factor of 120 and the answer will be,,, in my dreams Anything is Possible and then you can yell at them for being against the American dream, it won't take you much, to start calling that person a terrorist after that......

[@jolujo5842]

wow audio FAIL....try harder

[@robinswamidasan]

At last! Glad to see a comment on the audio. I was wondering if there was something seriously wrong with my PC. Amazing that NASA can't get this straight. They do many great things, I know.

[@helloSanders]

Huh.

[@jellymop]

She has a lot of enthusiasm and passion for this. She needs a younger more vibrant audience haha

[@simongills2051]

One of the most important stars in the universe is there in the room, Emily Levesque herself. And to think that in most of recorded history she would have been confined to the kitchen and bedroom. What a waste.

[@gamingvloggingbros754]

c

[@godmeherbaba5607]

💖💖💘💘❤❤

[@johnduncan1170]

Lq1

[@Tonicwine999]

Gah, these videos are annoying when they use a laser pointer and you cannot see it in the video. Just don't know exactly what he is talking about at times :-/