If my Calculation is correct, the highest Score possible with the Nilfgaard deck (versus another Nilfgaard Deck) for the 3rd Round is 514 points instead of 490 (and +15 & +17 for the 1st & 2nd round). The number of Cards in the Deck should be 37, including + the Roach=horse card called by Geralt/Ciri (3 points) + Fringilla Vigo (6 points) + Siege Technician (0 points) • the 3 Darkness cards (4 points each) • 3 Decoy & 1 Horn * stealing 1 Brigade of 3 points (better by 4 points than 1 Emissary) ○ allowing to get 5 Brigades = 15 points x 5 = 75 ... + 2 Emissaries = 10 points x 2 = 20 ... total 95 points ○ this is better than 4 Brigades = 12 x 4 = 48 ... + 3 Emissaries = 15 points x 3 = 45 ... total 93 points
@kretztech Жыл бұрын
One more healer means one more card in the graveyard. This is impossible in practice. This was almost a perfect game and the opponent exhausted all his options with Decoy, Medic and Spy cards. 6 points more is still possible (496). 2 from Gaunter and 4 from the Brigade. In Next Gen Roach would still bring 8 points more (so a total of 504 points). P.s. I would have liked to take the Brigade (it would have been 4 points more), but unfortunately the opponent didn't play it in the first two rounds.
@abishainesan95082 ай бұрын
I only cared about the story and fighting boss before now, I'm really interested to play gwent after watching your videos.
@mm-xl1il2 жыл бұрын
I'm impressed by your ability to play Gwent. You are truly a master.
@GuNStaRia Жыл бұрын
playing against NPC is a simplest thing. In real game this strategy sucks
@kretztech Жыл бұрын
@@GuNStaRia However, one could arrange against real players and record games would be much easier to achieve. Against the A.I. on the other hand, it is a disaster and you need a lot of time and patience for a game like this. Ergo, it is much harder to implement. It should be clear that a person acts differently. But the A.I. plays so crappy. Unfortunately. I've also played a lot of games against real people and of course that's a lot more fun.
@Yaman.Y.J6 ай бұрын
Did you buy a physical edition Or is there a way to play it online with other people? @@kretztech
@FlyAchXАй бұрын
Real life Gwent?☠️ I wanna play@@GuNStaRia
@kamilo9514562 жыл бұрын
Spy battle 😅
@gustavosilveira69111 ай бұрын
I know this video is over a year plus, but if you see this comment, could you explain the logic behind redrawing the black archer (10 points) instead of the 6 point card? Is it because you hope to get the archer later with spies and want a worthless card early on in order to stall/force your opponent to play more cards?
@ice_swallow_come59648 ай бұрын
3 months late but I think it's about his build, his entire build is reliant to the ability tight bond so sacrificing the 10 point card is valid as it gives more of a chance to get what he wants (which cycling spies)
@Ashes-Crime Жыл бұрын
Превосходно! Настолько знать механику гвинта и понимать написанные поведенческие скрипты противника!? Намеренно скидывать ему старших шпионов, и держать одного про запас для активации навыка лидера!? Эта партия - дорогого стоит...😉👍
@ЯрославЯруткин2 жыл бұрын
Продолжай
@decddow9282 Жыл бұрын
Even Geralt himself can't play better than you.
@troubleXV Жыл бұрын
Is this in game Gwent at ultra pro max difficulty with NPCs?
@kretztech11 ай бұрын
All settings on hard yes.
@granityseis1042 жыл бұрын
Nice
@kretztech2 жыл бұрын
Thanks ;-)
@KriegerWar Жыл бұрын
Why they give u victory in 1st round
@zonnschijne1232 Жыл бұрын
The AI on Nilfgaard feels the need to have a card advantage in hand over the player whenever possible for the first round. It considers the first round losable if it has at least 1 loss to spare.
@noodlebob5302 Жыл бұрын
Cool vid
@aFinalNote Жыл бұрын
HAAAAY...HAHAHAAAY...HAHAHAAAY
@Artqno_8 ай бұрын
i did 811 points
@TheRealBood10 ай бұрын
Which NPC is this
@kretztech10 ай бұрын
Sasha
@SaShA657227 күн бұрын
@@kretztech i not playing gwent thou😅
@lopezlirio4004 Жыл бұрын
que pro
@kaynhuros20502 жыл бұрын
Im surprised you didn't use the horn on the close combat. Otherwise, the damags would be obscenely high