Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at: discord.gg/ZJzn8h8bJW 🎵 Music used in this video: Xomu - Last Dance: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHfPZpSBa9OSfLM #chess #ChessBut #drawback
Пікірлер: 154
@entrefilmes.emaratonas3 ай бұрын
Sometimes I forget that in drawback chess the opponent also has a drawback
@corynewell88923 ай бұрын
You aren't trying to guess it? It's its own mini-challenge
@noideawhatever3 ай бұрын
Cuz we used to watch 100-rated games where only Simp had a drawback
@idonnow23 ай бұрын
Oh so that's why the opponent was making constant blunders that seemed way too nonsensical to actually be low ELO blunders
@cristobalgauthier6923 ай бұрын
he could have just kept developing pieces that weren't attacking anything instead of blundering everything. This looks like a paid actor if you ask me.
3 ай бұрын
@@cristobalgauthier692 I guess it was just a misunderstanding of the drawback.
@bluesbest13 ай бұрын
I thought at first that he could only attack pieces that had just moved or something.
@danielhoang2893 ай бұрын
From the way opponent played, I thought his drawback was something like "you have to capture pawns if a certain [unknown 2nd condition] happens" since his blunders came from capturing pawns
@LassBisharp3 ай бұрын
I was wondering why they kept going for trades. Usually trades don't happen that often.
@spencers58983 ай бұрын
The opponent's drawback was such a perfect match-up. All-out offense versus all-out defense.
@theblackantonio3 ай бұрын
Age of Sigmar is get
@adi_g3 ай бұрын
Simp : "Absolutely impossible" Me : "Ah, so completely possible"
@enderyu3 ай бұрын
Unless Simp's internet mysteriously crashes
@NWRIBronco63 ай бұрын
I mean, it was actually impossible to win if opponent played correctly as described in the video...
@adi_g3 ай бұрын
@@enderyu that would be most unfortunate
@luitmeinen19023 ай бұрын
@@NWRIBronco6 nope, it would be extremely easy to win... The drawback was as long as you have pawns. All he would have to do is sacrifice or promote all his remaining pawns and he would win. To do this he could even sacrifice his knights and rooks for opponent pawns
@teambellavsteamalice3 ай бұрын
Indeed he had two rooks and two knights, just trade three of them for the right side pawns and your golden...
@MrTrainman963 ай бұрын
People seem to not be reading the opening of the drawback saying "As long as you have a pawn" meaning once you have no pawns, you have no drawback
@rsnnramlall96423 ай бұрын
That sounds like something a coward would do
@locoludwin32283 ай бұрын
The opponent can also read it and chose not to take anything
@drawmanbr70083 ай бұрын
@@locoludwin3228 well, not in this case due to the opponents drawback. But that was only discovered in the end
@Eira_993 ай бұрын
Yer, so the opponent can just not take all the pawns. Thus the possible stun lock.
@Mythraen3 ай бұрын
@@drawmanbr7008 Drawback said you can't make non-capturing moves with pieces that could capture. The opponent should be able to prevent that sort of situation most of the time, by always having at least one piece that can't capture anything.
@yashaakimov53783 ай бұрын
I think with this drawback optimal play is just trade/sacrifice all pawns and play normaly, because after last pawn died, you dont have drawback anymore.
@idonnow23 ай бұрын
No cuz the opponent can simply refuse to take your most backwards blocked pawn and completely neutralize you
@person80643 ай бұрын
I think optimal play would be play super defensively, since defense isn't as affected. Hope your opponent is aggressive and blunders their attack, allowing you to have some free pieces to sac to push pawns
@brainha57473 ай бұрын
Pretty sure it's an automatic loss once you cannot follow with your drawback, so in this case if he did sac all his pawns the site would just give simp a loss
@LOSNA17LL3 ай бұрын
@@brainha5747 Nope, it's specified in the drawback: "As long as you have pawns, [restriction]", so no pawn means no restriction If there is an additional loss situation, it is explicitly written ^^
@neomedved3 ай бұрын
@@brainha5747 drawback specifically states “as long as you have a pawn”
@pedrovieira42273 ай бұрын
Im proud of myself for actually figuring it out opponent's drawback
@person80643 ай бұрын
The worse drawback to reveal would probably be something like "as long as you have a knight, you can only capture with knights." I played someone who revealed that drawback to me. Even after I revealed my own the game lasted barely 8 moves before I slapped my queen next to his king.
@jeremyready80303 ай бұрын
I've won that drawback every time, far from the worst
@RJM5363 ай бұрын
@@jeremyready8030 Worst to reveal, not worst to play.
@stevenglikin32193 ай бұрын
worst drawback to reveal is "if at any point your king would be in check on an open board you lose", simp got that one in one of the early videos if i'm not mistaken
@person80643 ай бұрын
@@stevenglikin3219 I forgot about Homeland Security! If your opponent moves a piece into your starting 16 squares, you lose. I analyzed it a bit, and unless your opponent has a very restrictive drawback, you won't see move 4
@paulamarina043 ай бұрын
worst to reveal is "you must move at least as far as you opponents last move". e4 qh5 qxf7 qxe8#, absolutely nothing your opponent can do abt it
@anhdunghisinh3 ай бұрын
Actually despite your opponent drawback is easier, but it play right into the benefit of your drawback that you have to play it passively, he had to concerntrate enough force to break your defense, but he can't because of his drawback and have to do many bad trade.
@ムャlechat3 ай бұрын
tbf he did choose an offensive tactic with lots of possible trades. while cant decline a trade. bruh.
@JannPoo3 ай бұрын
1:51 I think their thought process there was that by capturing that pawn you wouldn't be allowed to capture back, since all other pawns would be behind that line, misunderstanding the fact that the pawns themselves are not bound by the drawback. That or they completely misunderstood their own drawback and thought that they had take if they could take with one of their pieces.
@ethermelt47803 ай бұрын
It seemed pretty likely half-way in that the opponent HAD to capture if he could. That's definitely something to work with! can't ever forget that the opponent has drawbacks, too!
@annaairahala94623 ай бұрын
This drawback feels almost impossible. In order to win, you'd either have to lose all your pawns, or take the king with a pawn
@antonliakhovitch83063 ай бұрын
Is it legal to promote a pawn to a pawn? (My guess is no)
@DrZaius31413 ай бұрын
Why? Get rid of your pawns and you have a free game.
@KC-gb4vr3 ай бұрын
@@DrZaius3141 that's entirely dependent on whether the opponent takes your pawns or not, unless you force them by checking them with a pawn
@GeneGear3 ай бұрын
My guess is that promotion would open up the full board, or else you literally wouldn't be able to move the piece after a promotion. Or you really do just have to sack all your pawns.
@dinohall25953 ай бұрын
They really resigned with 4:56 left on the clock. Maybe if they had actually made use of their 5 minutes they would have given Simp his first loss.
@Eggyfirefly3 ай бұрын
I will never get tired of you using scaramouche's boss music
@rtasdsasfrt76713 ай бұрын
That drawback made the opponent in a losing position I think
@Defender9021015 сағат бұрын
drawback chess: 100% w̶̶i̶̶n̶̶r̶̶a̶̶t̶̶e̶ paid actor
@mainkg6383 ай бұрын
The worst drawback on this site is definitely "Devil on your shoulder" - It can literally make your King commit suicide!
@proosee3 ай бұрын
Simp is trying to fool us, neither the drawback nor final position were absolutely impossible.
@simonkarsten2723 ай бұрын
At first I thought it would make sense to develop in a Pirc or Modern style of opening, slowly gaining space with your pawns. But then the game would be slowed down a lot because typical outbreaks wouldn't be possible giving black no chance to exploit mistakes by white. So in the end Simp chose a fine way to open the game, shame he had doubled blocked pawns in the centre
@weeblordgaming60623 ай бұрын
Usually simp is the only one with a drawback
@D1.y3 ай бұрын
One of the drawbacks which can really f*ck you over because of the "taking the kingt"-rule
@1wpc1543 ай бұрын
...Just trade off all your pawns? Then no drawback?
@the_tele_porter46653 ай бұрын
The opponent normally wouldn't have to take the pawn, and even with that drawback they can just block the remaining pawns to force a draw
@zeroyuki923 ай бұрын
Difficult to trade that stuck two center pawns
@Tsuinosora3 ай бұрын
The opponent could just trade all but one pawn and then block its advance.
@DharshM03 ай бұрын
That would be the play but the opponent saw his drawback. He was actually playing around it and would have made sure to keep 1 pawn alive. The opponent only lost because his drawback was hard to win with against a defensive opponent
@Banaanaei3 ай бұрын
If you lost all your pawns it would probably be an instant loss, based off other drawbacks
@CSDragon3 ай бұрын
Typing this before the end of the video: The opponent definitely has a "If you can take you must take" style drawback.
@OskarCzechowicz-OmniMusician3 ай бұрын
I played against this drawback once. My opponent spent his first two moves on pushing the a pawn, which has made me suspicious. I quickly worked out what his drawback is and trapped all his remaining pieces on first 3 ranks. But I forgot about the AS LONG AS YOU HAVE A PAWN part, I captured his last pawn and then lost my queen 🙃
@MasterM233 ай бұрын
Suggestion: You can only move a piece, after the pawn that started in the same file died.
@GTron133 ай бұрын
Judging by the wording of the drawback, would a viable strategy be to sacrifice all of the pawns? It sounds like the moment you lose all of your pawns, you can move freely. I would think being down a few points in material is worth getting rid of the drawback. (of course if your opponent knows the drawback, I think they would purposefully not take the last pawn, but that might also be usable to your advantage as the final pawn would basically be untouchable)
@EDoyl3 ай бұрын
An untouchable pawn just defines the size of your prison. You need the final pawn to be a passed pawn, and that's very easy to prevent.
@DomiaAbrWyrda3 ай бұрын
Simp should have sacrificed all his pawns in the endgame instead of trying to push them
@LetsPlayCrazy3 ай бұрын
I am fairly high rated for drawback chess, so I constantly get these insane drawbacks... Like "each move you can only move to a black OR white square... randomized each turn (like wtf) Or "you can't move your rooks. If you lose both your rooks, you lose" Or "Medusa: whatever the queen is looking at can't move!" wtf... try defending a queen with just your knights... Some of these you can only win if you assume best play (without drawbacks) of the opponent... Which is honestly the biggest hurdle in all of this :'D
@NatoBoram3 ай бұрын
You were playing Sim City while he was playing Checkers
@dontpickonme3 ай бұрын
I figured they had to have some compulsory capture drawback
@tarultoyarto3 ай бұрын
50-move draw is going to be hard to beat with this drawback no matter what the materiel advantage. You can only attack the opponent's back line with pawns, and promotion is mandatory.
@killerwithoutcanary3 ай бұрын
now imagine it being 'least advanced pawn'
@Waffles176433 ай бұрын
Even if he didn’t resign I’d imagine you could’ve just gotten rid of all your pawns and then proceed
@diffdimgamerseven99863 ай бұрын
As long as you have a pawn... So you have to sacrifice the entire joestar bloodline to a gay looking vampire i see (8 pawns, 8 parts so far)
@lukecox63173 ай бұрын
ANTI-SPOILER BARRIER.
@riishith3 ай бұрын
good try
@Alresu3 ай бұрын
The key to winning would be to lose all pawns, which in this specific case would have been quite possible because of the opponents drawback. It would have seemed hard while doing it and then surprisingly easy in retrospect, I believe.
@TheSandvichTrials3 ай бұрын
That would only be reasonable to attempt if you already suspected the opponent's drawback.
@Alresu3 ай бұрын
@@TheSandvichTrials Why? Losing the paws makes all his other pieces way stronger. It should be among the default strategies for this drawback.
@TheSandvichTrials3 ай бұрын
@@Alresu Because if the opponent doesn't have a drawback that you can use to force them to take, the opponent would just deliberately not take your pawn and then you're fucked. Remember, Simp has revealed the drawback, so you'd be an idiot to take his last pawn willingly.
@Alresu3 ай бұрын
@@TheSandvichTrials Absolutely. But if they have to block it also makes it harder for them to attack. In this case Simp was worried about the opponents pawns but since the opponent could not just take all of his pawns without ending the draw back, there would have been a plan of attack. I will not claim it would be easy. But it's a strategy.
@prosamis3 ай бұрын
I figured the opp's drawback out by the middle of the game. It was too convenient with his play pattern It made me predict that knight capturing the pawn in front of the king move
@forcecaptainoverlordsuprem29643 ай бұрын
I had the opposite of this drawback in my first drawback game ever, where i could move a piece ahead of my most advanced pawn and my opponent figured it out. Needless to say I was butchered
@nblack28673 ай бұрын
You have clearly never played with "Devil on your shoulder"
@eganwong13663 ай бұрын
Simp could have sacrifices all his pawns and play with non-pawn pieces
@josephsalomone3 ай бұрын
Opponents Drawback is way worse.
@pafnutiytheartist3 ай бұрын
That's far, far away from being the worst drawback on the site. This is very mild actually.
@EDoyl3 ай бұрын
He literally can't win.
@pafnutiytheartist3 ай бұрын
@@EDoyl Trade in all pawns, go everywhere. There are drawbacks that prevent you from moving king, much deadlier if revealed.
@EDoyl3 ай бұрын
@@pafnutiytheartist How could you trade off your last pawn? the piece in front of it cannot be captured.
@KC-gb4vr3 ай бұрын
@@pafnutiytheartist the opponent can simply not take
@subramanianakash55602 ай бұрын
@@EDoylhis opponent's drawback was worse
@seronimo__77353 ай бұрын
Idk why the opponent resigned
@stevengrundy42963 ай бұрын
This wasn't impossible. If you let your opponent take all your pawns you can play on a full board
@KC-gb4vr3 ай бұрын
Except that he always reveals his drawback, which means the opponent can simply not capture his pawn
@subramanianakash55602 ай бұрын
@@KC-gb4vrthe opponents drawback forces him to capture pieces. He can't refuse the pawn
@3141minecraft3 ай бұрын
A challenge for you: Explain how it is 200% winrate without using the word "Asian", "Asia" or similar words. Edit: also, you are not allowed to say "Terrence Howard" or something similar
@cadekachelmeier72513 ай бұрын
He's a big fan of Terrence Howard.
@3141minecraft3 ай бұрын
@@cadekachelmeier7251 what is that?
@9nikola3 ай бұрын
@@3141minecraft asia
@cadekachelmeier72513 ай бұрын
@@3141minecraft An actor that was on Joe Rogan recently. He's in a weird conspiracy land and believes that 1*1=2 and Big Math just doesn't want to admit it.
@cpsof3 ай бұрын
Simp needs to learn how to push pawns.
@Arsenniy23 күн бұрын
actually i had a drawback "if can move the king into check - must" thats what i call impossible to win 0_0
@pickaxe42483 ай бұрын
My opponent had this drawback before and i won
@masterlxds3 ай бұрын
I would like to see this at 100 rated level
@taiyoqun3 ай бұрын
I have to ask, wouldn't it be impossible to win without sacrificing all the pawns? You can't take a pawn to the other edge of the board since it'll promote, and since in drawback chess you have to physically capture the king, he can just stay on the last rank and be invulnerable (unless you checkmate and capture with a pawn maybe?). I'm guessing your plan was to promote them all? Or did you interpret the rules differently? I think the optimal play would have been to sacrifice them since you had material advantage, but I don't know, I'm NOT a cOwaRD so I can't know your thought process. Nice video as always.
@Moleoflands3 ай бұрын
You can force the checkmate with a pawn
@sillyking19913 ай бұрын
@@Moleoflands there's no checkmate, you have to capture the king. so not only do you need to "checkmate" with a pawn, it has to be in such a way that all possible escape squares on the 8th rank are covered by pawns.
@sillyking19913 ай бұрын
you don't necisarily need to "sacrifice" (in the sense that you give them away). a piece can exist on the 8th rank , it just can't move until all pawns are gone. so you could also win by just promoting all of your pawns.
@jeremyready80303 ай бұрын
You have not seen closed book. That's probably the worst drawback.
@riishith3 ай бұрын
whats that
@jeremyready80303 ай бұрын
@@riishith If after you move and there's an opened file, you lose.
@riishith3 ай бұрын
@@jeremyready8030 who even thought of that
@EDoyl3 ай бұрын
@@jeremyready8030 Sounds very impossibe
@sgas3 ай бұрын
3:45 playing defensive instead of pushing pawn and baiting queen?
@tdubmorris57573 ай бұрын
wtf it said your drawback was on the easier side thats just wrong
@Slash270153 ай бұрын
and i'll be the worst first post, let's go
@rohan18643 ай бұрын
Dude if you just got rid of all your pawns your drawback would vanish. It's clear from the way it was formulated.
@Moleoflands3 ай бұрын
Hard to do that when the opponent sacs all their pieces and you have no passed pawns
@rohan18643 ай бұрын
@@Moleoflands what I mean is I don't see why he was fighting against f4 at 5:00 for example, it could have been huge progress for him. or why he was so pessimistic about queenside pawns fighting against each other. besides, he only needed to sacrifice one of his extra pieces on d5 or f5 to unclog his doubled pawns. he was up two knights and a rook, or two knights and two rooks at some point. i think he just didn't realize his drawback would vanish once all of his pawns were dead. it really wasn't that difficult to make progress in his situation, make tiniest sacrifices and either push your pawns forward or get them captured.
@KC-gb4vr3 ай бұрын
@@rohan1864 yeah but the opponent could just decide to not take the pawns and limit mobility, he could have just captured every pawn except the doubled pawns and there would be no way to win
@moallayoussef54623 ай бұрын
4:09 why not take with rook?
@kn0pkasanchouskoffeev3 ай бұрын
Chess Simp is back to 154K subs! 🎉
@davidwagner61163 ай бұрын
You are funny!
@NoomStuff3 ай бұрын
Video 181 of asking simp to play fps chess
@deandelvin99243 ай бұрын
What if the e5 pawn died? Would the horsie on c5 just get stuck? Could it go back? Or would it end the game completely?
@HNBGamer3 ай бұрын
Probably can go back, as long as there's another pawn at the same rank as the horse when it landed. The challenge only limits where can you move to, not where you can move from.
@Someone-tn8ur3 ай бұрын
I play drawback chess, current ELO on the site is 1650 and I get impossible challenges half my games. I do not know how Simp gets so many players who don't even know how to play chess like his opponent obviously didn't. I've rarely seen players this bad when I play on this site,
@annihilator64243 ай бұрын
Scouting Ahead As long as you have a pawn, you cannot move non-pawns ahead of your most advanced pawn Record as: 1W 0D 0L (1.00) ez
@Psykolord19893 ай бұрын
"Absolutely impossible." *hurriedly into phone* Look, I'm tellin' ya, put it all on Simp to win! Have a little faith, buddy!" *SPOILER GUARD* *After watching, calmly adjusts new monocle and top hat*
@AyaanMansuri-gn2bg3 ай бұрын
Hello, I have never been this early to one of your videos before.