Literally no KZbin video has ever started with a more compelling intro than "today I'm going to show you how to make an ion propulsion jet".
@chingelauria74153 жыл бұрын
253 likes and no comments?! Me:FINE I WILL DO IT MYSELF
@lasajnae96263 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah
@jamescunningham18443 жыл бұрын
"Hey vsauce michael here"
@sorelzah46733 жыл бұрын
We all have ionic jets now.
@brianbordenkircher523 жыл бұрын
Lol
@PlasmaChannel3 жыл бұрын
Love that you have the SparKit Wimshurst! That's a cool little powersource, designed by a 14 year old in New Zealand.
@minepaperstudio56833 жыл бұрын
Yey
@parzival__13 жыл бұрын
Hey plasma channel , I'm Ur fan
@-ChrisD3 жыл бұрын
Plasma channel, I love seeing your comment! I just recently received a coffee mug of yours in the mail that I ordered. The black mug with the key and energy in purple. It's fantastic! Such a cool image 👍🏻
@karmajsbetter3 жыл бұрын
OMG. I can't believe you commented on this channel. Both of my favorite channels talking.
@checkingoutgypsymike20753 жыл бұрын
Hopefully someday a person with the vast knowledge you two have will build a controller and run a hyperdrive system like Gerard Morin was trying to build, if the electric companies can use their skin effect energy to pull the ionic energy out of the atmosphere to feed our transformers, building a frequency controller to run the edrum motors should be no problem.
@G2721-e7z3 жыл бұрын
For some more infos on the ion thrusters on spacecrafts: In comparison to chemical rockets the exhaust speed can be way higher (exhaust speed correlates to efficiency). They are already used on satellites. They have a low TWR meaning they produce very little thrust in comparison to their mass. The gas used is mainly xenon and doesn’t contain any energy that is used for propulsion, it’s just used as mass that can be thrown away(to create thrust ). The energy comes from solar arrays / batteries.
@boots78593 жыл бұрын
Yes, that sounds correct. Question is what is the MPG equivelent of Xenon they are carrying. Several orders of magnitude higher than molecular combusion IIRC.
@jemlittle17873 жыл бұрын
Mass that can be thrown away ? Thats a tiny bit flippant sorry. That tiny bit must be taken with and also gives a finite travel distance. Both the main reasons ion is touted as better this test just shows it fails on.
@HarryPotter993 жыл бұрын
Ah shit
@ryandean31623 жыл бұрын
@@jemlittle1787 Mass that can be thrown away is the way all space travel works. You move by throwing away the uninteresting bit (the fuel) to move the interesting bit (the spacecraft) somewhere else. Conservation of momentum requires this. Thankfully, there is no Conservation of Interesting Bits. In fact, the center of mass for the spacecraft and fuel remains stationary, at least barring outside interference, and the fuel just ends up over here somewhere, and the spacecraft ends up over there somewhere. The question is exactly how efficiently can you convert into movement the throwing away of the uninteresting bit. Conventional rockets are not very efficient, ion thrusters are very efficient.
@tinypine78313 жыл бұрын
Xenon provides the mass associated with its density( heavier than other nobel gases / elements) also bioavailability of Xenon requires no catalyst; be used as a zero point energy source
@wesleybaker81882 жыл бұрын
You just explained ion propulsion in 2 minutes. I've spent hours watching probably boring space engineering videos and never understood. Legend
@EiriksvinZ3 жыл бұрын
That's a whole new engine race. Ion engines, size, thrust, speed records, the whole game. Usage ideas like secondary engines, or stage related concepts. This is exactly what we need to focus on for any and all aspects of travel. Make it happen.
@datatwo74053 жыл бұрын
Providing of course the petro industry and the politicians connected to them don't fight to slow it down like the joke of a president Bush, Jr. and Cheney. They did everything they could to slow non petrol fuel source development while pushing petro dependency. That is only one of the reasons that the U.S. is still stuck in stasis with no real impacting developments since the turn of the century.
@EiriksvinZ3 жыл бұрын
@@datatwo7405 Well, I'm a supporter of seeing the Petro industry taking the lead on this sort of venture. While they figure out the science of it, we'll buy big trucks and gas guzzlers as incentive to lead to something better. My position is to support the expansion and growth of the current industry throughout the process which frees us from that burden. They've got tons of funds, and some of the smartest guys on the planet, so there's no reason they couldn't flood our markets with infrastructure funds and investment opportunities. If we keep them on our side, they'll be sure to keep us with new engines. There will always be an oil industry, but who knows, they might find that diversification of resources earns them even bigger rewards.
@potatopower7073 жыл бұрын
That’s a while away, there are many loose ends there.
@ringofasho77213 жыл бұрын
It's INCREDIBLY inefficient. First of all you need high voltage, which means heavy batteries and tons of power. And the heavier battery, the harder it is to move the object. Think about how much power you would need to push a car uphill with wind, then think about how heavy your power source would have to be to give that much thrust. Now put that battery pack onto the car and it's too heavy to push again.
@potatopower7073 жыл бұрын
@@ringofasho7721 good explanation
@jaisuriyar52593 жыл бұрын
"I'm out of content" -Words never came out of this guy's mouth.
@Elsonlianneihguk3 жыл бұрын
+He's so wholesome
@toragold3 жыл бұрын
Don't give him pressure. He is working hard. Even he can burnout 😅. But yes, the guy is never out of content 😂. Im always asking what he brings next. And he is always impressing me with his content. I Love this channel. some times im even laugh like the video where he jumps from a car. btw cool experiment 👍☝
@insectbite17143 жыл бұрын
@@toragold he time traveled in one of his episodes. HE KNOWS IF AGENDA 2021 WILL WORK OR NOT. HE IS TRYING TO MAKE EAERH DEPOPULATED WITH BILL GATES😒💧🫔🥔🥚🦪🤪👦🤪👦🏆🧪😬👦🍒🤯🎀🥔👵😂🍾🥔💚🌄🏆😡😄🔥⛎🤪😎🎀🇨🇳🇨🇳⛎🥚🇨🇳😬🇨🇳🍒🇨🇳🇨🇳🍾🫔🤪🦪🫔👦🍾🦪🥕🍅🫒🥕🥕🍅🔥🎃🥚🔥🥚👱😒💚😒🏆🤷🤷🇨🇳🎀🥚😒🇨🇳🥕🎀💚😡🥚🤯👱👵🥔🎃🥯⛎😂😣🥯🎃😂🥯🎃🥯😫🤷😫🥲😣😫🥲👱😫🥲🏆🧪👱🥲👱🧪🥲👱🧪🥲👱😒👎👵🌄👵👎😬👎🫒😎🥚👱😎🌄🥚😎😬💚😎🏆🎀🥕🇨🇳🎀🇨🇳🥕🍒👎😂🎃🥔🤯😎💧⛎🥲💧😎🤷🏆💚🥚🤯😒😂🍒🥯👎😬⛎💧😎😎💧⛎🔥⛎😎⛎💧🫒🎀🥕😒
@OeshenNix3 жыл бұрын
@@insectbite1714 are you drunk or having a stroke maybe both and stupid
@loganthesaint3 жыл бұрын
Science will never run out of content
@theoriginalkeysto3 жыл бұрын
I love the fact you 3D printed some no mans sky spaceships to use as planes, great little Easter egg there lol. (They also use ionic propulsion in the game, for those that dont already know)
@Carlo99yehey3 жыл бұрын
@Maxime Schweitzer same ngl
@EchoNovemberDelter3 жыл бұрын
Does it say in the description, or is tritium/di-hydrogen a fuel source for ion engines?
@theoriginalkeysto3 жыл бұрын
@@EchoNovemberDelter tritium and dihydrogen are highly ionized substances, that's all I know. Lol
@ThirstysURL3 жыл бұрын
We use fuel that we build and discovery most of the museum of alien life 4k video ourselves
@Corpah3 жыл бұрын
It's the alpha vector
@LightningEagle142 жыл бұрын
That explanation was incredible. Concise, but very easy to follow. I understood it right away. What a cool concept! It’s crazy to think that you can propel something with just electricity and no moving parts.
@melissaflood5052 жыл бұрын
Yeah here on Earth
@poggergen19372 жыл бұрын
@@melissaflood505 *cough* oxidizer *cough*
@taz61222 жыл бұрын
@@poggergen1937 lmao!
@luminasentinel83182 жыл бұрын
What more crazy is. We got now the technology to have unlimited energy the man replicate the power of the sun light and converted into electricity.
@freezingcathedral Жыл бұрын
why is that crazy?
@justsaiyan86783 жыл бұрын
If you were my physics professor, I wouldn’t ever leave class.
@shifa-84233 жыл бұрын
Yup
@leiladekwatro31473 жыл бұрын
Go home, the graduation ceremony ended 4 years ago
@douglas600403 жыл бұрын
I had a pretty cool physics instructor...it’s fun to continue learning by a hands-on KZbinr.
@madkirk74313 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@sm10_23 жыл бұрын
My graduation ceremony will START 4 years seriously
@jamofthejar3 жыл бұрын
"Hi everyone, today I'm going to be showing you how to make an ion propulsion jet." He said as if we had the same level of equipments to follow along.
@mrsprite3993 жыл бұрын
In our imagination, everything is possible and every equipments can be found even the outer space ones.
@Quagula3 жыл бұрын
You have a fork and an outlet dont you?
@jamofthejar3 жыл бұрын
You know what to do
@absalomdraconis3 жыл бұрын
@@Quagula : You also want to build a step-up coil for that sort of thing. Fortunately, plenty of places sell AC-voltage wire.
@pineseeker61623 жыл бұрын
@@Quagula hehe bad memories trying that one
@artdonovandesign2 жыл бұрын
I assumed the thumbnail was an exaggerated illustration. But Prof. Orgill NEVER disappoints. And 3...2...1... The glowy, purple ion thrust was simply wonderful! Another great episode from Action Lab :(
@noahway13 Жыл бұрын
3 2 1
@eta10tp1 Жыл бұрын
:(
@Beyond_Babel3 жыл бұрын
Him: the reason it's spinning in a circle.... Me, an intellectual: is because it's hard to spin in a square
@II_Bruno_II3 жыл бұрын
Very funny
@williamchamberlain22633 жыл бұрын
Sounds crazy, but it can be done (ish): kzbin.info/www/bejne/nnSTgp19l7KIfqs
@chillinggrin843 жыл бұрын
Technically the truth
@davisdf30643 жыл бұрын
@@williamchamberlain2263 They did it they actually spun on a square
@williamchamberlain22633 жыл бұрын
@@davisdf3064 crazy isn't it?
@AnonymousMC3 жыл бұрын
Congrats on 3 million dude! Your content is very informative and I like the short videos! Keep it up.
@milord29213 жыл бұрын
Ur subbed to the ppl i watch
@AnonymousMC3 жыл бұрын
@@milord2921 Yeah lol
@myrmatta13 жыл бұрын
IS THIS THE REAL MINECRAFT!?!? I love your game!
@andrewhamop66653 жыл бұрын
Father?
@AnonymousMC3 жыл бұрын
@@myrmatta1 Lol, no, not the real Minecraft. So sorry lol. Their channel is kzbin.info and mine is kzbin.info.
@ashkanr47963 жыл бұрын
if you were my science teacher, id probably graduated from Harvard by now. you are a very inspirational person and I'm 38 and saying this. idk what you do besides YT, but imagine if you teach science to kids, it's gonna be awesome. you make future scientists. make them inspired and enthusiastic. you are a very awesome individual and I never get out of your channel disappointed. wish you all the best in the world. love and respect
@Admiral45-102 жыл бұрын
I'm really into aviation. Planes using cheap and effective methods of propulsion sounds just awesome.
@RootzRockBand Жыл бұрын
@@ooneybird27I suggest you watch “keys to the truth” “how top gun fighter jets fly”
@patrickrose12213 жыл бұрын
You really are the tops . Blew me away with this one. I'm 58 years old and you make me feel like an amazed kid again . Thank you so much : )
@Carlo99yehey3 жыл бұрын
glad theres something that can make people like you smile, god bless
@patrickrose12213 жыл бұрын
@@Carlo99yehey love and peace to you and yours x
@patrickrose12213 жыл бұрын
@@Carlo99yehey my boy calls me Boomer pmsl : )
@2toeninja3 жыл бұрын
This would make a great plasma ball type toy. Would be sick if you could have an x-wing chasing a Tie fighter.
@JJ_Binks3 жыл бұрын
Especially because a the 'TIE' in TIE fighter stands for 'Twin Ion Engines'!
@oliverslicey3 жыл бұрын
@@JJ_Binks that’s dope
@wawar1633 жыл бұрын
@@JJ_Binks sickkk
@Toodoi2 жыл бұрын
@@JJ_Binks Actually George Lucas just called them TIE fighters because they looked like bow-ties.
@olliefoxx71652 жыл бұрын
@@Toodoi That's not as cool as 'Twin Ion Engines". I'm going with the cooler definition even if it might be incorrect.
@OldSilkRoad3 жыл бұрын
Those two little aircraft chasing each other is the most badass thing I’ve seen today.
@Carlo99yehey3 жыл бұрын
69th like nice
@scp-yr4kv3 жыл бұрын
@@Carlo99yehey 96th like ecion
@edisonhugo85543 жыл бұрын
100th like to you oldsilkroad :)
@OldSilkRoad3 жыл бұрын
@@edisonhugo8554 Thank you!
@OldSilkRoad3 жыл бұрын
@@Carlo99yehey My favorite number 😉
@elektroqtus2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the insight on this topic. I have a -15Kv power box as a negative ion generator. Did ion wind experiments as well with it. Was supposed to be anti gravity plates, the blueprint. My voltage was too low, plates too small and no glass insulation between them. Cardboard doesn't do so great
@michaelknight5589 Жыл бұрын
Do you know how hot the flame gets? Thanks :)
@truegret77783 жыл бұрын
I worked during summer break whilst in college at a power supply (Space Shuttle flat CRT monitors, military displays, etc. - 15-30KV @ 1-4 microamps as I recall). We had an ionic sculpture with a spinning spiral wire balanced and spinning on pencil lead. This was connected to a high voltage power supply - it was pretty cool, wish I still had it.
@vitaminprotein65493 жыл бұрын
The best scientific explanation channel on youtube.
@MaximMarkiw3 жыл бұрын
Golden Pepe haha
@DennisJDuran3 жыл бұрын
This comment made me follow this channel.
@poppedweasel3 жыл бұрын
Ooh, with a giant tesla coil we can make the Earth's orbit more eliptic or inclined. We might not have an atmosphere afterward, but it's an option for solving global warming. Well done, Action Lab.
@arthemis10393 жыл бұрын
When the answer is worst than the problem !
@user-qy2wf2lt6v3 жыл бұрын
It will be just 300 ℃ during the day, so not sure hwo that solves our global warming problem. Maybe the -160 ℃ during the night will compensate for it.
@il_moddo3 жыл бұрын
I see this as an absolute win
@mrono19103 жыл бұрын
You cant alter the movement of our planet without ejecting mass from it or moving mass closer or further from the center
@poppedweasel3 жыл бұрын
@@mrono1910 That's why I suggested we might not have an atmosphere afterwards. (Now someone's going to calculate how mach deltaV the atmosphere's worth just to tell me my joke is nonsense)
@jasonellis8180 Жыл бұрын
This is the kind of technology I’ve been talking about for years now, this will change the evaluation of aircraft flight. This is the future.
@aaabbb-tr2yd3 жыл бұрын
Could you please share any circuit diagrams, voltages etc. that can help us replicate the experiment? Thanks for you awesome videos all the time. A physics teacher.
@raymondedge88892 жыл бұрын
Just research online. This tech has been around for 40+ years. Found not even close to being effective.
@CTimmerman2 жыл бұрын
Those permanent Tesla coil sparks might be dangerous, but video 5R9VlK2iSZ4 shows you can achieve the same static propeller effect with a Van de Graaff generator.
@1littlelee2 жыл бұрын
brobally not because it look suspect
@CTimmerman2 жыл бұрын
@@ooneybird27 Kinetic energy of the propelled ions moves the device, similar to ion thrusters on satellites.
@airierwitch4116 Жыл бұрын
@@ooneybird27 It's much more efficient to propel the fuel with an ionic engine, rather than just the pressure of the gas - although many spacecraft do use pressurized gas maneuvering jets! Ionic propulsion produces much less thrust at once, meaning you can't accelerate very fast, but it's so much more efficient that you need a very small amount of fuel to propel the spacecraft. You just have to wait longer for it to get where you want it to.
@Kodum_BheegaraN3 жыл бұрын
Boring physics & chemistry at schools but now I'm curious to know physics and chemistry here😂. Our school syllabus are outdated 😂😂😂
@thalavalikaran2623 жыл бұрын
Exactly 100% correct👍😁
@qureius4943 жыл бұрын
But they are the base
@gavincarr29903 жыл бұрын
@@qureius494 i agree. Even though they are tough classes, having a foundation in them makes these videos much easier to grasp, as well as allowing the viewer to make their own guesses/ hypotheses about the experiments
@Khonic233 жыл бұрын
Syllabi*
@joshimilind103 жыл бұрын
SpaceX's Starlink uses ion thrusters to coast in their orbit from when they are deployed.
@@ovidius2000 At some point the satellites would just enter the atmosphere if out of fuel, no clue how long they would last
@AntonisDimopoulos3 жыл бұрын
Ion thrusters are used in spaceflight since the 80's
@shaihulud45152 жыл бұрын
What a great introduction! Went straight to the basement to get my diy-stuff ready. Can you please show us how to make or own fusion reactor next time? This would be dope!
@nizu9544 Жыл бұрын
all you need is uranium, boron or cadmium, steam turbine, and generator. you have now achived nulear power plant be sure to slow down uranium with boron or cadmium or you will blow off the Earth be sure to be careful
@narayanbandodker54823 жыл бұрын
I have an idea you can try out: Since light travels faster in a vacuum than in air, can you show light refracting in your vacuum chamber? You can shine a laser through it, see where it lands, then create a vacuum and watch the laser change course
@realryder2626 Жыл бұрын
Take it to the hadron collidor... and send it
@sselesUneeuQ3 жыл бұрын
Me, at work on a break: ah yes, wonderful stuff *sipping my soda in lalaland*
@mr.medico98633 жыл бұрын
Ironic Propulsion : *Exists* Vacuum Chamber : *I'm gonna end this man's whole career*
@Otzkar3 жыл бұрын
Ionic
@fikhhgg3 жыл бұрын
Haha
@nambam54093 жыл бұрын
Unlucky autocorrect
@_ruted3 жыл бұрын
lol thats probably why his suit stops working at high altitudes
@rdxdt3 жыл бұрын
True ionic thrusters works in vacuum, they accelerate the gas and newton laws do the rest.
@TheRealPhilG2 жыл бұрын
do these not work on a larger scale? seems to me that this would be an interesting way to make a plane fly and never need to really refuel
@lesliel11822 жыл бұрын
Oh there are plenty of designs for this. Plenty...but they won't allow the cats out of the bag, that there has never been any reason for burning fossil fuels. Now why would you imagine that is?
@chubbmaster6164 Жыл бұрын
unless you make really efficient solar panels you're going to have to refuel. and electric aircraft do exist. i doubt that this type of propulsion can be scaled up that much
@chubbmaster6164 Жыл бұрын
@@lesliel1182 well at the moment the world can't function without fossil fuels and we can't really switch to green energy because of insufficient battery storage
@Kai...999 Жыл бұрын
@Leslie L Theres not enough energy density. It's not a fossil fuel conspiracy, they just suck in practice. Obviously in this Era a company would immediately greenlight a technology that removes refueling.
@lambjab9832 Жыл бұрын
@@Kai...999 There is, it is a conspiracy. See when the say that it's a "theory" then you know it's real. They bank on their brainwashing program because of how successful it's been.
@davidmcnamee1363 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to see if a “ducted ion fan” could be made by recessing the needle into the airplane a little, and making the body of the plane hollow so that air can be accelerated throigh it.
@johnb48823 жыл бұрын
I need to add this to my x wing and tie fighter figures.
@Carlo99yehey3 жыл бұрын
good luck my friend
@homevander3 жыл бұрын
@@Carlo99yehey twin ION ENGINE
@thunderstrike89353 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on getting to 3 million subscribers!
@jayjoseph-r5t2 жыл бұрын
Man! We need professor like him ….he is best in teaching
@diobrando98423 жыл бұрын
Space engineers players: “hey, I’ve seen this one before, it’s a classic
@dakat51313 жыл бұрын
Except in SE the ion thrusters work worse in the atmosphere.
@jaxjax20113 жыл бұрын
@@dakat5131 its because se thrusters are hets
@dishsoap84283 жыл бұрын
yeah until you bring forth the world
@krispockell6853 жыл бұрын
"You supply the gas thats going to get propelled out the back." I sure do, you know me so well.
@laffbath67403 жыл бұрын
Can I get a quarter? Wya
@akakonqoro3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@stewarth83903 жыл бұрын
All of a sudden bake beans and the farting scene in Blazing Saddles comes to mind as a gas source 😂😂
@therice3 жыл бұрын
So basically the reason why I'm so ass at going into an orbit in Kerbal Space Program is because I keep using thrusters that don't work in the vacuum of space 😂😂😂
@thatoneguy92913 жыл бұрын
Lmao if you’re using Ion thrusters they’re relatively weak for large crafts, they work fine though if I remember correctly.
@niks6600973 жыл бұрын
@@thatoneguy9291 no ion thrusters are not powerful(in kerbal), probably they'll add more parameters(future updates) in sync with latest inventions...
@thereoc3 жыл бұрын
Ion thrusters have incredible ISP and efficiency but TERRIBLE thrust to weight ratio.
@luckylmj3 жыл бұрын
ion engines in ksp only work in space but they're really weak
@Beertraps2 жыл бұрын
Ion thrusters for space travel DO work in space. In fact their main usefulness is in space because they produce very little thrust for their weight so in the atmosphere they are pretty useless. However because there is no air drag in space the ion thruster's weak thrust can last for years because they are fuel efficient and a weak thrust over years ends up giving you more total acceleration than rocket engines. So Ion Thrusters for modern spacetravel are mostly useful for long lasting missions.
@antonnym2142 жыл бұрын
That purple aurora off the back of those thing is incredible! Well done! Very impressive.
@chuckandmax73132 жыл бұрын
When I see technology like this being shown to me, it just makes me wonder exactly how far advanced our technology really is. I’m sure that there are top secret technologies that the government has created that are far note advanced. And if you can do this test on such a small scale I can only imagine what it’s like at a full scale. I am certain that we will be able to use this technology in the aeronautics industry and from what I’ve learned on other channels I know that there is an abundance of power surging in the upper atmosphere as low as 150 feet that planes can access without having to have a great deal of onboard energy cells.
@rxonmymind83622 жыл бұрын
Think levitation.
@Idiotboxxx2 жыл бұрын
Philadelphia Experiment
@AnonEyeMouse2 жыл бұрын
The problem is scale. This works well enough on tiny things but once you start adding mass it gets uneventful very quickly. Think about an ant. Notoriously can carry fifty times its own weight but if you were to scale it up to the size of a car, it wouldn't be able to stand or lift its head. Scale and gravity are a real kick in the crotch.
@icamefromthestars76472 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I’ve been researching for 20 years now? Energy is never wasted, only transformed? There’s almost a endless amount of energy out there THAT HAS TO BE TAPPED?
@RootzRockBand2 жыл бұрын
Fighter Jets have using this tech since the end of ww2. Do you think the wings of a fighter jet could possibly carry the amount of fuel needed to power fighter jets? They use microwave plasma engines, look at the exhaust nozzle on the back of a fighter jet when it’s in action, no smoke, they are not burning fuel.
@RCPlaneAddict3 жыл бұрын
That was amazing. I wonder how big, and how much energy you would need for a ionic jet to propel say a 80mm foam plane. Would be good to try.
@ne1cup3 жыл бұрын
look into "lifters" large but light structure using ionic breeze
@pranavcv12653 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile Electro boom: Hold my electric shock ****************
@fikhhgg3 жыл бұрын
Ok
@typicalmooyt693 жыл бұрын
He explains it in a funnier way
@That_Soviet_Memer3 жыл бұрын
if electro boom has the same characteristics as the action lab Ok we are going to do it 1 2 3 A Capacitor just exploded
@sharan-kumar3 жыл бұрын
@@That_Soviet_Memer 😂
@That_Soviet_Memer3 жыл бұрын
@@sharan-kumar Electrboom is the god of Profanity and the devil of free energy
@detroitredwings71302 жыл бұрын
Well...that just took the trophy for the coolest thing I've seen in a long time.
@bipinthakur89013 жыл бұрын
This channel is underrated. He deserves more attention
@7531monkey3 жыл бұрын
He should have like 3 million subscribers.
@DlSASTERCHlLD3 жыл бұрын
Even if this will prove to be impossible to engineer in any useful scales, this is a fascinating concept. Also, "ion thrust planes" has a good ring to it, haha.
@dr.zoidberg86663 жыл бұрын
It's funny to imagine a distant future when all aircrafts have been replaced with ion thruster propelled versions & the emission of greenhouse gasses is under control... but suddenly there's a new crisis of too much ozone building up in the atmosphere because of all the ion thrusters.
@insectbite17143 жыл бұрын
@@dr.zoidberg8666 yet there are chemicals that remove ozone and most planes fly in space or near space so the ozone will instantly escape
@matakaw42873 жыл бұрын
That's a novel way to pass gas. Congratulations on 3M!
@GetMoGaming Жыл бұрын
The only thing that confuses me, is the + ion @1:32 bouncing back. Surely it would carry on, hitting neutral molecules in the direction of the wind. Intuitively, I just can't see it bouncing back and hitting the + electrode. I suppose if it didn't though, you wouldn't get thrust there. Unless, it's the like-charges that push the + electrode and the +O2 apart, causing thrust. No need for it to bounce back, then. Any thoughts, anyone? I'm pretty clueless about this stuff.
@GetMoGaming Жыл бұрын
I hate it when people reply, then when I look, there's nothing there!? How does that happen??
@markyWWE2343 жыл бұрын
Just wanna say that you are still one of my favorite science channel. Keep it up man😁
@WingmanSR3 жыл бұрын
I agree. Though I do miss "Hey, Vsauce! Michael here!", and I still love Veritasium, though that is a bit more academically in-depth. Action Lab is a great channel for teaching people not about science as much, but why they should *_enjoy_* learning about the sciences.
@prahalord3 жыл бұрын
An idea: make this thing spin in water Edit: if my math is right the propulsion would be nearly 16 times more than it was in air
@SqueezeboxOfDelights3 жыл бұрын
just don't stick your fingers in the water while it's running...
@dwaraganathanrengasamy61693 жыл бұрын
I believe the viscosity is pretty high for water to make this work... Nice thought though...👍😃
@inventor1213 жыл бұрын
Normally I'd say you'd be right, but the water would decompose into hydrogen and oxygen at that point.
@inventor1213 жыл бұрын
@Deborah Ajao ion propulsion relies on ionization and water can only be ionized to a very small extent. At high voltages it becomes more likely that the water will electrolyse.
@inventor1213 жыл бұрын
@Deborah Ajao it will but I doubt it would work well. At some point it's just going to split off into hydrogen and oxygen. You might get some passable thrust but nothing that could beat even the weakest of electric motors.
@sorinciolacu99293 жыл бұрын
Action Lab, you never fail to inspire and amaze me. I love your content and the way you present it. Never stop and always continue to bring informative lessons to the world. You are doing a great job doing what you do well done!
@nealwright56302 жыл бұрын
I remember, when I was a pre-teen, our Childcraft encyclopedias had ionic propulsion explained. I always wanted to build something to show it. And I always wondered why spacecraft did not use it.
@SURENARUN3 жыл бұрын
Awesome video🔥🔥🔥 Why are you not giving advertisements in the video😓.I need to contribute to you. I couldn't afford for join button or action lab kit😖😓 .I will never skip an advertisements in your video,I will watch it fully 😀. Btw congrats for 3 Million 🔥🔥👍👍
@maxtv333thesuperstar33 жыл бұрын
even if its 1 hour long?
@sa-zq4eq3 жыл бұрын
Tamil aa bro
@SURENARUN3 жыл бұрын
@@sa-zq4eq yeah bro
@SURENARUN3 жыл бұрын
@@maxtv333thesuperstar3 no ad will be of 1 hour bro...
@SURENARUN3 жыл бұрын
@LuckyStar no bro
@Alan_Skywalker3 жыл бұрын
Want to know, how much voltage there needs to be to generate a wind strong like that in the first experiment?
@dsdy12053 жыл бұрын
several dozen kilovolts
@NLGeebee3 жыл бұрын
@@dsdy1205 yeah... I was afraid of that :) So no battery powered ionic propulsion in the near future...
@dsdy12053 жыл бұрын
@@NLGeebee The voltage alone doesn't mean too much. You have to look at voltage x current x time of use.
@YYYValentine3 жыл бұрын
On the tesla coil, because it is AC, it is different. There, the increased pressure of the heated air (heated by the spark ) pushes the ships around.
@TheActionLab3 жыл бұрын
Yes the heat definitely has a contribution to the planes spinning. But AC voltage also works with ionocrafts as well (although not as well as DC). I’ve seen a lifter (ionocraft) fly using a Tesla coil with no visible plasma. The neutral wind still occurs even with AC voltage because whether it is positive or negative the neutral wind moves in the same direction.
@YYYValentine3 жыл бұрын
@@TheActionLab That is interesting! Thank for the answer!
@gabelster372911 ай бұрын
This video served me to develop my high school monography. I’m SO grateful this dude made this video
@staresinconfusion19463 жыл бұрын
It sounds like what Iron Man used for his repulsers and thrusters.
@typicalmooyt693 жыл бұрын
Ya
@abhinav34783 жыл бұрын
Send this idea to blacksmith industries.
@ebeleldo67693 жыл бұрын
Hehe, yeah
@staresinconfusion19463 жыл бұрын
Yessir
@srijanumesh53553 жыл бұрын
@@abhinav3478 hammer industries
@pramitharyan51673 жыл бұрын
The action lab NEVER ceases to AMAZE
@shotanet8883 жыл бұрын
Finally, I understand how Hayabusa's engine worked!!
@Darthbelal2 жыл бұрын
I've seen things like this before, THANK YOU for a down to Earth explanation of what ionic thrust can and can not do.......
@Neo_Zeon3 жыл бұрын
It's how TIE fighters from Star Wars get their thrust. Twin Ion Engines.
@thebzo3 жыл бұрын
Nice!
@benisjammin89263 жыл бұрын
Could be wrong but that sounds way to weak
@scottowens3983 жыл бұрын
@@benisjammin8926 I want to make a *"I'm too weak!"* joke, but my real answer is it's Star Wars. George Lucas can do whatever he wants. =)
@thebzo3 жыл бұрын
@@benisjammin8926 It's a fictional world 🤣
@serenityofcognition9203 жыл бұрын
No oxygen is in space
@jimmcdougall99733 жыл бұрын
Great video, thank you. Perhaps I’m a pessimist, but I always ponder what short and long term effects our endeavours will have on the environment. What are the costs to the environment in manufacturing and using such propulsion systems? Oxygen to ions = what byproduct, if any?
@laurakranich2 жыл бұрын
Any good engineer should first create the problem, then some time later find a solution.
@madison03482 жыл бұрын
@@laurakranich like they did with oil lol
@Unrelistk3 жыл бұрын
If I'm remembering correctly the problem with ionic thrusters is that while really efficient they have a low acceleration due to the low mass of the charged particles they use as thrust.
@ChAnimations2 жыл бұрын
@Mr. Ditkovich that will increase the thrust, but decrease the efficiency, because the exhaust velocity will be lower. For space based ion thrusters, the thrust is limited by the available electric power (usually up to a few kW). If you have more power, you'll have more thrust while maintainig high efficiency. So huge solar panels or a nuclear reactor would be the way to go for large and high-thrust electrically propelled spacecraft.
@katwal54112 жыл бұрын
I would like to see your experimental setup mentioned in the video. What was the minimum voltage required? minimum current? What was the Force per Watt generated using a force (Newton) scale?
@richardpagel69593 жыл бұрын
I really like your videos! You explain things simple enough for everyone to understand, using some very nice visual experiments to do so.
@blackoak49783 жыл бұрын
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. While it may be true that the ions bounce back after hitting neutral atoms/molecules, the main thrust is in the initial pushing of the ions. If the electric field pushes ions one way, then the source of the electric field must be pushed the other way with equal force
@noabsolutelynot36603 жыл бұрын
But the neutral atoms, the "wind" as he puts it, is moved using electrostatic repulsion from the ions, not the force generated on the ions themselves. The reactionary force to this is imparted on the ions, not the source of the field, but since mass is moving in one direction, it generates thrust on the direction of desired movement. And remember, the ions are moving opposite to the desired direction of movement, so the reaction force there is actually *helping*.
@MaxSMoke7773 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I had to search the comments just to find one person who knew his explanation was wrong. And it is wrong. VERY WRONG. I've seen a few of his video. HE'S ALMOST ALWAYS WRONG!!!!
@MaxSMoke7773 жыл бұрын
@@noabsolutelynot3660 Seriously? You're splitting hairs! It's still basic Newtonian physics. The field makes a force that pushes, and is in turned, pushed. This guy is still COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY wrong.
@noabsolutelynot36603 жыл бұрын
@@MaxSMoke777 Take a deep breath and calm down.
@sumittrivedi37593 жыл бұрын
You are a genius. The quality of content is extremely good ! God Bless your efforts !!
@That_Soviet_Memer3 жыл бұрын
to spam the comments
@rootsharp99462 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I knew this was possible 10 years ago but I still couldn't figure out the efficiency. I guess no one knows.. yet. Good luck for the awesome people developing that drone.
@punyapanchal80433 жыл бұрын
The co incidence is that I was wondering yesterday about ionic thrust and here you are
@crazyfunyt71113 жыл бұрын
Me too
@AndrewRPerez3 жыл бұрын
Wonder about money lmfao
@onesadtech2 жыл бұрын
This is incredible technology! Thanks for sharing, your break downs are always very easy to understand, while still giving great detail. 😁
@onesadtech2 жыл бұрын
@simpsons Bart what are you talking about my dude?? There's no gas in the vacuum of space, but there's gas within atmospheres all over the place. 🤷♀
@user-cy2iq1gl1t3 жыл бұрын
I’d really like to see the math on equivalent thrust to the scale of a typical jet engine. I.e. The watt/amps/volts to produce enough thrust to replace a current aircraft jet engine. Let’s say 10000lbs of thrust for an hour. In addition the efficiency of an ion air engine. Theoretically is it more or less efficient to covert say JP5 to mechanical thrust or to utilize ion air propulsion? What is the %loss during final conversions vs the theoretical yield of the stored energy? Could you please white board this?
@ihateemael2 жыл бұрын
they won't/ can't. Ion thrust is viable in space cos there's no air resistance and it can stay on for months/years continuously accelerating. But here in reality its up there with free energy! But I'm happy to be proven wrong?!
@dewfall562 жыл бұрын
Physics and engineering are so cool. Youth of America, if you can manage to get into those fields (not at all easy), you will get the excitement of new discoveries, and the respect of the world.
@titanproductions36283 жыл бұрын
Learned more here than in school love your KZbin channel ❤️❤️❤️❤️
@raymondjackson12083 жыл бұрын
So the spacecraft stops when it runs out of gas. Well that's not going to get it very far. What powers the ion stream?
@konncord3 жыл бұрын
thats what i was wondering
@marvin14323 жыл бұрын
RTGs or solar panels.
@aarytem76893 жыл бұрын
The space craft won't stop in space until an external force is applied
@attepuurtinen11603 жыл бұрын
your mama
@xyz82063 жыл бұрын
I don't know about space, but it's going to be pretty useful here on earth. Ionizing the air around it to produce thrust.
@smartlearning32222 жыл бұрын
Hi, whats the voltage required to generate the ionic thrust?
@gamma2581 Жыл бұрын
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm naughty naughty tryna build an ion engine
@stephenross84632 жыл бұрын
I know nothing but the absolute basics (probs even less than that) about propulsion systems......but I understood every word of this presentation....thank you Sir.
@Ogsonofgroo2 жыл бұрын
Just found this and am amazed, thanks so much for teaching/sharing!
@agustinbs2 жыл бұрын
amazing, thank you so much for explaining this so clearly and practically
@h7opolo Жыл бұрын
superb. you finally give hope to an emerging technology. please make an updated video about this topic, i.e. ionic thrust. thanks very mooch!
@whatidoinmyfreetime22893 жыл бұрын
That's so cool oh yeah and this isn't a dangerous experiment.
@ikitclaw71463 жыл бұрын
Untill you ramp it up to maximum power! and set something on fire lol
@NPC-bs3pm3 жыл бұрын
I LISTENED TO YOU❗ ⬇ 🔥🔥😧🏠🏚🔥🔥🚒 Why would you do this to me😞?
@whatidoinmyfreetime22893 жыл бұрын
@@NPC-bs3pm what to you???
@NPC-bs3pm3 жыл бұрын
@@whatidoinmyfreetime2289 You said it was safe you said it "isn't dangerous" Now I have no home 😥
@whatidoinmyfreetime22893 жыл бұрын
@@NPC-bs3pm sry due to my stupidity I still don't get it.
@thelight7863 жыл бұрын
How does the electric field form when there is no 2nd terminal on the other end?
@pranavp.a12003 жыл бұрын
Electric field exists for point charges as well
@Flusterbomb3 жыл бұрын
Bookmarking this for a thousand years into the future when this is commonplace.
@michael45763 жыл бұрын
Nah, easily in a couple decades.
@robinbrowne54199 ай бұрын
Very cool indeed. The little purple jets at 4:00 are awesome. 👍
@prathamdhattarwal3 жыл бұрын
This guy is a genius!
@nistarok1233 жыл бұрын
"So this is pretty amazing, we can generate wind with no moving parts" I can do the same with a bowl of chilli and a couch, big deal.
@mbm84043 жыл бұрын
Under rated comment!👌
@megatronyeets3 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@svenplayz16493 жыл бұрын
So thats how aircrafts fly in the futuristic movies huh. Heck, we can have flying cars fly like this!
@benisjammin89263 жыл бұрын
Way too weak
@MountainManMike3 жыл бұрын
@@benisjammin8926 not really :-) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetoplasmadynamic_thruster
@erridkforname3 жыл бұрын
Yup. Now we only need a small fusion reactor xd
@MountainManMike3 жыл бұрын
@@erridkforname Not if you beam the power to the ship instead of carrying it with you :-)
@rat_king12362 жыл бұрын
No way so if I went a little way past it my idea for my 6th grade science fair project would have worked 🤣 nice video 100% subbed
@osmacar53313 жыл бұрын
So that's how elite does it, fusion reactor gets "dirty" from the reaction process the "dirty" air then gets sent to the thrusters
@vaibhavshukla23533 жыл бұрын
So nobody is gonna talk about the corona spinner.
@borism.53753 жыл бұрын
You mean a fan behind?
@moltenhydrogen22183 жыл бұрын
haha funny corona
@ryzenryne87473 жыл бұрын
@@borism.5375 there's no fan behind lol
@sdsdsd88883 жыл бұрын
@@ryzenryne8747 watch the reflection at 2:22
@ryzenryne87473 жыл бұрын
@@sdsdsd8888 I saw the reflection, so what?
@AaronNetsell3 жыл бұрын
Action Lab...you're the best !!! Never a dull moment, always fascinating. :-)
@javi84312 жыл бұрын
Thats a good idea, put this for everyone to see so all can give feedback from this so he can screen everyones idea to get something that does work for free.
@OnlyForFunRajput3 жыл бұрын
I did this 12years ago, i used flyback transformer to create a high volt spark, which makes the positive wire to give a thrust n move it in opposite direction when switching on & off, when the positive terminal is suspended in the air, lol happy to see it again😍
@Metal_Master_YT3 жыл бұрын
I had minecraft on in the background, and when he turned on the electricity I heard a thunder strike in-game at the same time.
@michael45763 жыл бұрын
I play Minecraft a lot too. That thunder striking when your speakers are up high and you're not expecting it can be awfully surprising! 🙀
@bluethumbbuttoneek94653 жыл бұрын
I too also mine the craft
@Metal_Master_YT3 жыл бұрын
@@bluethumbbuttoneek9465 xD
@M0NSTER_D0SE3 жыл бұрын
yooo that ship is from No Man's Sky, I'd recognize the shape of the thruster and wings everywhere
@fallout_hun3 жыл бұрын
Me too, and I specifically looked for a comment like yours to know if anybody else recognised it!
@Joopyter7243 жыл бұрын
Damn I haven't played nms in ages Their ships are much more iconic than space wedges haha
@M0NSTER_D0SE3 жыл бұрын
@@fallout_hun Graaah fellow interloper!
@zabby5332 жыл бұрын
Fantastic information, This brings another question.. how did the Apollo missions create trust in a vacuum to go to and return from the moon?
@DraconicMaker3 жыл бұрын
I thought it said “ironic thrust” that would be pretty ironic!
@scottowens3983 жыл бұрын
Not quite..
@zantar6663 жыл бұрын
The amount of great content you put out amazes me. Thanks
@BBBCanada12 жыл бұрын
Best explanation I’ve seen so far.
@saims.24023 жыл бұрын
It will fly better in space.
@saims.24023 жыл бұрын
@Mister Dicken I thought he would make a gas tank
@saims.24023 жыл бұрын
@Mister Dicken I like predicting what’s going to happen.
@pratik48333 жыл бұрын
But there is no air in space
@ayubshaik29073 жыл бұрын
@@saims.2402 and you prediction is wrong
@saidarshannayak95383 жыл бұрын
i think if we use a torch light Then it shoot photon and progagate 😜
@Time-cc2qb3 жыл бұрын
You read my mind I was literally thinking about ion propulsion