Panasonic FZ2500 (FZ2000) Hands-On Field Test

[@Raychristofer]

Outstanding review, I don't think folks realize how much time it takes to shoot and edit and narrate something like this. I actually use some of your ideas when I do my own photo gear reviews respect.

[@yamingoat]

Raychristofer Jordan is a video editing sex god, probably effortless

[@videolane]

Thanks for the field test review of the Panasonic FZ2500. Note to self: :) Full flip touch screen :) Quick Autofocus :) Touch-screen autofocus :) Dedicated Movie Mode :) built-in ND filters :) time-lapse feature built-in (no app required) :) 10 bit 4:2:2 broadcast quality :) mic jack :) headphone jack :) bad ass lens hood :| 1-inch sensor :| Slo-mo 1080p 120fps :( starts to look noisy for video at 1600 ISO in low light (native 400 ISO) :( Some delay in on-and-shoot (must wait for lens to extend) - vs RX10 Mark III (bigger zoom range, lighter weight, lens aperture ring, slo-mo 1080p 240fps, no ND filters)

[@sush2142]

Always happy when your video drops.

[@danielharvard7688]

Agreed.

[@stevestruthers6180]

I always like the reviews that come from The Camera Store. They're generally honest appraisals and don't pull any punches or hedge in an effort to avoid saying anything too negative about other camera brands that they might carry. I also like the way the reviews focus (no pun intended!) not just on image quality, but overall usability, along with any potential pros and cons.

[@dennisolof9994]

That was a perfect review, you covered everything anyone need to know about that camera. Great stuff :) The 10bit 4:2:2 is just amazing, perhaps this is the start of 10bit era for Panasonic cameras.

[@1barnet1]

Dennis Olof The Gh4 already had it. The recording options seem like a carbon copy from the Gh4 I also saw that it had the 100-200 mbps ALL I 1080p. Also DCI 4k at 24fps. Panasonic practically unlocked the full force of this processor in this affordable well thought out package.

[@dennisolof9994]

Oh, that is good to know. Thanks

[@bobbostick8932]

Chris, after a zillion articles and comparisons online your video and evaluation put me over the line, I just ordered the FZ2500. Don't get to handle cameras every day, most show rooms around my area don't even have a Panasonic FX2500 for me to hold and understand what is good and not so good about the camera. You, on the other hand, get to do that all time, and that reinforces my decision making. Thank you for your reviews.

[@ChrisProuse]

Great review! Thanks for sharing - the backlit seagull was priceless :)

[@RaveemZafarChoudhry]

i see u everywhere

[@BfreshMedia]

I pre-ordered this camera from you and got it on Monday. So far it is living up to the hype and I'm very happy with it. Thanks for all your reviews and my experience with the shop was very pleasant (online sales dept). Will be picking up the V-log soon too!

[@MrMlyarber]

I just got mine, yesterday and spending a lot of time learning it, there is so much there! Can't wait to use it on a up coming assignment.

[@tomfalcon4637]

You guys do some of the best camera reviews ever and I really appreciate it :-)

[@amulyabaruah5070]

I'm buying this ( in stead of Sony RX10 III) after watching ur video, although I've many cameras e.g. FUJI XT1, XT2, FZ200, GH2 and LX15 etc. I'm getting old (65) and and I travel a lot. So Fuji XT1+XT2+lenses etc for home use only, but FZ2500 for travel as I don't need to carry lenses. Thank you guys, love your videos!!!!!!

[@shankar4510]

hi I am from nepal . I wannt to be a film maker. do you maybe have spare canon eos m? or any video camera that you like to give away?

[@AirGunWeb]

I have one of these and I use the crap out of it. One point that is really important to me is the unlimited record time. I have a Sony rx10 Iv as well and I forget about the 29/30 minute recording limit. I’m a solo creator and it really stinks when you don’t realize that you just lost the last 10 minutes because the camera stopped recording. Anyway, I love the FZ2500. For all the reasons you talked about in this video. Cheers Rick / AirgunWeb

[@AlexBeaverProductions]

I have watched a few of your camera review videos and I think your channel is the best when it comes to reviewing.

[@stefanieb.8852]

Was just looking desperately for a good review on the FZ2500. How cool is that!

[@Daniel_Zalman]

Really lovely colors in this weedeo!

[@phillip_ino]

finally....a full review on this camera! I love it. I think this would be a great vacation camera to go with my gopro.

[@JacquesGaines]

You guys are hands down the best reviewers. Thanks guys

[@highdough2712]

I've had the FZ1000 for a year now and absolutely love it. Kind of wish I held out and got this, though. The video improvements look fantastic. Just wish it was weather sealed.

[@ludovicomenegon5498]

You guys deserve more views and subscribers.

[@PolluxChung]

I sold my FZ1000 last week and got the FZ2500 yesterday. Have only played with it for a few hours but already find out this is a nice upgrade. The new features make this camera a great all-around Run & Gun video camera.

[@alexandruvirgil4577]

I have so been waiting for this comparison! Thank you! :)

[@frostfreerunning690]

Awesome just got the g⑺ looking forward to it

[@davej3736]

I second Raychristophers' comments. Kudos. You really need to step up to broadcast TV and or movies. If you haven't already lol. Your on-camera presence is one of the best Ive seen in a very long time.

[@agro0]

No love for jordan in this video :D

[@PathLessPedaledTV]

Great review. Does it have IBIS? How does the stabilization compare to the new dual IS?

[@3BMEP]

Guys, nice vid! I remember Jordan talking about limited dynamic range - any further thoughts on that?

[@TheCameraStoreTV]

Log recording helps dynamic range dramatically, but really, really needs to be overexposed. Jordan @ TCSTV

[@patdinco]

I can't afford the cameras they review but I just enjoy the content xD

[@Lucas-qr7ul]

I feel you bro..

[@satbir3719]

Haha I’m too

[@squaretops1]

@@satbir3719 me too

[@nefflz]

Another great review - detailed for stills and video without pretention, and straight to the point!

[@vittogol]

Just 2 words for 4K photo and no words for auto zoom without noise function

[@Michaelmaggimee]

I bought this. very impressed with its video quality

[@ekki782]

Thank you! Best review until now!

[@adriennem3168]

5 years have passed and this camera alone is still $1,000. Why? Is there something better now?

[@Rendiermans]

What's with the 400 ISO in bright daylight, you've got a 1600th of a second :)

[@patrickfortin634]

Thanks for such a great review! You guys have been so helpful with your informative videos that I decided to go with this camera. I’ll see you in store very soon!

[@JuganautTimelapse]

Really excellent in depth review. I came here today after the #dpreview of the Sony RX 10 IV (which came out today) and they mentioned in that review the Panasonic dmc-fz2500. I have to say I really like this camera :-)

[@KIDSPLAYHD]

What do you think is better for the subject of shooting video in 4K? A6500, Sony or Panasonic fz2500?

[@ellarpc]

I wish you would have gone more in-depth on the video capabilities. Maybe talked about it's ability or lack of shutter angle. Thanks for all the videos you guys do put out. TheCameraStoreTV is almost always my first stop to find out more about cameras.

[@bmfitzgerald3]

Fantastic review! I think you've sold me :) Question: How do you deliver your lines so smoothly? Pure talent? Teleprompter? Short takes? Many takes? Outline? Practice in advance? Thanks a lot

[@yoginwidhi6676]

He is just that good. If you see their earlier video, he got that talent from the very start, a smooth talker

[@scdobserver835]

How did you grade this? The FS5 colour doesn't have that typical greenish yellowish skin tones!

[@williamking7420]

I've heard many comments about the fz2000 not being as sharp as the Sony. I don't doubt this to be the case, however, I'm wondering why it is that in every single side by side image comparison between these two cameras the Sony always looks one or two stops darker than the panasonic? I've seen this odd difference in every comparison I've researched on these cameras.

[@rossmcleod3286]

After considerable research I ended up buying a fz2500 for a light weight day to day and travel camera instead of packing my Nikon D810 and multiple lenses. My comment and question is "what's with 4K video" it is very hard to find a mid range good quality Bridge camera without the over riding focus being on VIDEO? I just want a camera to shoot stills!!!

[@theSUBVERSIVE]

If I had the budget, I would buy a GH5 - a focal reducer and the Sigma f/1.8 duo - and have this as a b-cam so I don't have to worry about tele lenses in the GH5 for the most things I would shoot, then also have a Mavic Pro for some drone shots, buy a gimbal and that would be my excellent on the go kit. I just wished it had 240fps but if the GH5 has it, then it won't matter as much.

[@raksh9]

I use the GH4 and native Panasonic and Voigtlander lenses, and the FZ2500 is going to fit in just fine as both a B-cam and complementary cam. The FZ2500 will be great for run and gun scenarios when moving from indoors to outdoors, as the ND filters can be changed without having to screw on or unscrew something in the front. It will give the ability to quickly zoom from wide to tele without having to change lenses, allowing one to get shots that may be missed during lens changes. On shoots that are in decent light, and documentary rather than beauty B-roll, the FZ2500 will do really well.

[@jbealsmusic]

Love that the bass guitar intro is back. Sad there was no Jordan for the video part. :( I have an RX10ii, which I'm mostly happy with. However, the lack of touch screen, inability to flip/rotate the screen, and a number of other small annoyances means I'll be taking a closer look at the FZ2500. I'll miss the faster lens and quality slow motion of the RX10ii though. Decisions, decisions... Wonder if anyone will consider a trade.

[@stefpix]

I am in the same boat. I shoot Sony and biggest issue is moving the focus point with the click wheel (although it has face and eye AF, not always reliable with groups of people). I bought and never loved the RX10iii. ND filters and touchscreen are definitely a plus. What did you end up doing?

[@HomesickMac]

Great review, agree on every point. Bought this camera mostly for video and corporate filming, great feel in the hand, fantastic menus (my first Panasonic besides for and old camcorder years back), love the autofocus and customizable buttons. Of course one always loooves his last and newest camera but I did a long research before hitting that order button. Was watching preview videos, your review of RX10 III and many others, GH4 would have been too expensive in the end, with a GH5 around the corner.... I was just watching your G7 review again because I'd need a B camera for filming the interviewer, and I'm mostly thinking of having the same video profile on both cameras (both Lumix, right?) and save some editing time, as well as the G7 still being a great device.

[@AgnostosGnostos]

Common amateur photographers love the power zoom but with interchangeable lenses the power zoom isn't very common. With bright expensive lenses it is very rare. However during the film era Minolta has a Xi series of a-mount lenses with motorized zoom. The 28-80mm xi f4-5.6, 28-105mm xi f3.5-4.5, 35-200mm xi f4.5-5.6, 80-200mm xi f4.5-5.6, 100-300mm xi f4.5-5.6.

[@WayneSmithT41]

Great review - was still tossed between the RX10 III and this FZ2500 - Looks like the bridge camera to get into the 4K is this FZ2500.

[@TechInspected]

Just as you said there's no birds around, one lands and stretches it's wings at 4:35 on the river behind you.

[@NarekAvetisyan]

The RX10 II is still the best in my opinion. Can't beat that constant f/2.8 zoom. The variable aperture just kills it for me on any camera. I hate that. btw if you want even better camera than the FZ2500 at less than half the price take a look at the FZ300. That camera is the best all around camera on the planet right now at the lowest price. The FZ300 is a camera for everyone even more so than the FZ2500. That's what I believe. And I'm surprised TCSTV hasn't review that excellent camera. It really deserves praise. Very underrated.

[@Indigonac]

Thanks for the effort man. I've gotten some very good new insights.

[@MrHorsenaround]

Very nicely done Chris! This was the info that we have been searching for! Following you on Instagram.

[@RajeshPNayak]

You guys really deserve more views and subscribers...... Fantastic work 10/10 Hey I want to know is this camera has built in time-lapse mode feature?

[@simonmountford1511]

Yes.

[@jonmcdade7219]

In short, I've done a lot of research on what I want, and my timing was perfect with this release.This is a BIG purchase for me (2k NZ), but I've waited years for something like this. I think I'll be the first in New Zealand with this camera (hard to hunt down, 'nuff said). I'm also a Canuck/Calgary ex-Pat, and your accent was music :-). There was a store with the same name I used to go to about 35 years ago in the CBD; just wondering. Well done, and thanks again.

[@joannesinspirations]

Great video. Is the VIDEO ZOOM any BETTER than the FZ1000?

[@gregparadi]

How about the 5 axis stabilizer ? This is a very important advantage and I think many of us are curious about practical usability...

[@trevorpinnocky]

Thorough and informative as always. Please tell me who put tape on your jacket? And please that it wasn't for your lavalier cable. :P

[@niccollsvideo]

trevorpinnocky The zipper was for what ever reason on this shoot making crazy noise. we did a quick fix. CHRIS@TCSTV

[@trevorpinnocky]

It's always something on a shoot. :)

[@NarekAvetisyan]

Chris what do you and Jordan think about the FZ300? That camera ticks a lot of boxes for everybody. And I think it's a very underraded. Any reason you haven't done a review on that? I would love to hear your take on that.

[@Zackariyaouchen]

trevorpinnocky so noisy... Worse than the fz200.

[@edwin_ac]

The video comparison on 9:35 between FZ2000 and Sony RX 10 iii. Wow that's a dark video on the Sony. No wonder they removed the built-in ND filter.

[@bertsteenbergen6729]

Great Review!! touching all the important stuff.

[@leslieabbott6119]

Excellent job! Thank you for such a wonderful review! I'm going to buy an Fz2500 now...seriously.

[@jonphoto5078]

Awesome vid as usual! I suspect that the Panasonic was more accurate at autofocus in your test in significant part because its ISO or F Stop (or both) were set to expose much brighter. Consider the difference in (1) exposure that you see on the brick wall in each and every one of the Panasonic vs. Sony frames from 9:20-9:55 in the video. Moreover, notice (2) how much more the background (e.g. the car) is in focus in the Sony's frame; it's clearly shot at a higher effective F Stop. Without equal light hitting the sensor (due to differences in F Stops) or equal gain (through ISO settings) there cannot be an equitable comparison. Thus one would need to re-do the test to compare the relative autofocus capabilities. But awesome video and thank you again, "Crushin' it" Chris and "Jammin" Justin!

[@drdimento]

Like to begin saying I love your reviews. Just the facts in a well presented "story" as you go out shooting and using the device. BTW, I'm a Canon man and this is definitely on my "next to buy" possibilities. Totally amazed at how well thought out the design and functions are (like the extended viewfinder so the touch screen is thumb/finger accessible) plus even as a pro I'm wanting to explore fixed lens and mirrorless 1" and see if I can unload these heavy pro cameras of mine. Thanks "Thumbs Up"

[@marciorihass2190]

Beautiful review. I had the FZ1000 and RX10 2. My god, Sony needs to take some lessons from Panasonic as far as usability. Great job.

[@harkirankaur9247]

This was 7 years ago. I was waiting for maybe another upgraded camera since I had the fz1000 (original). Of course now the mkii is out and newer but ultimately I decided to still get the 2500 for extra reach, faster burst mode, ND filter etc. The 2500 still sells for 1249 CAD and up. I did look at Sony rx10 mk iv but it's almost double the cost for not much more benefit (a bit more reach and a tiny bit better aperture settings is not worth 1000.00 to me. Selling my fz1000 and going with fz2500 with the fl550l external flash and lumix remote shutter release (eliminates camera shake alltogether). Also got a good cold shoe mount shotgun mic for video. This is honestly best balance of sensor size vs zoom range. A dslr with several lenses to cover up tp 480mm equiv would cost way more (I ultimately sold my dslr and lenses for the fz1000) and be much more bulk to carry around! As they say best camera is the one you have with you all the time and all in one for me is best.

[@digitalclips]

I shoot currently with Canon but the weight of all the gear and especially the 100-400 mm L is just too much for vacations as I get older. I was close to going for the RX10 III as a walk about and 4K video for an upcoming cruise to Antarctica. You just convinced me the FZ2500 is far better for my use, I agree ND filters are a must for video. Thanks guys, great reviews as always. One question, do you think I could be won over totally and sell all the Canon gear or do you feel I'd miss the quality for stills? I shoot wild life here in Florida mostly.

[@ianyams]

I have used the Fujifilm S1 for the past 3 years, ok it's slow but the 50x zoom range and picture Quality are excellent. I also use a Nikon D5300, Nikon P900 and a Panasonic TZ80. Until the camera manufacturers start producing a minimum 50x zoom with a 1 inch sensor I'm sticking to my Fujifilm S1. Great review by the way. 👍

[@peterdisbury8739]

I Currently own its smaller sibling the FZ1000, fun camera but mushy quality compared to the larger Micro 4/3 sensor. Video and Time lapse are great though on FZ1000.

[@bmzpower]

awesome review. I've been considering getting one of these, I rent the GH4 alot and this def helped me. Thanks.

[@Algerie.Football.Officiel]

Hello, which of the two cameras FZ 2000 and FZ 1000 M2 has better autofocus, is it for taking pictures of sports day and night? thank you

[@VioletGOKU]

The half-press to shoot customization is genius for avoiding that camera shake. Can you please mention some interchangeable lens cameras (DSLRs and mirrorless) which also have this feature?

[@AQUPAS]

Mainly for 4K video, this, Canon XC15, or the Sony RX10 III ? Can't make up my mind !!

[@thecounsellor7065]

ChrisBeBallin buy fujifilm x-t2 and dont regret. Thats whats i learn from this video. Lol..

[@barandcross]

What is the manual focus like during a zip zoom? If you auto focus on a far distant subject at maximum zoom, then switch to manual focus mode and fast zoom out to wide and back in again at close up, does the lens maintain focus throughout the range and hold it at the wide angle end? Almost performing like a par focal lens ( although I think the lens itself is not actually a par focal lens?) Thanks

[@1barnet1]

Damn this looks like a KILLER video Cam Hey Canon you wanna make a XC20? look this is how you do it. 1 question what is the crop like when recording 4k?

[@TheCameraStoreTV]

There is an additional 1.5X crop when shooting 4K. This makes the lens an equivalent 35-720. We talked about this more at the end of our G85 episode (shot on the FZ2500). kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXXOhJ2Mo7GkbNkm33s Jordan @ TCSTV

[@1barnet1]

Thank you, That's bummer, and unlike with a mirrorless you can't effectively counter this by using a speedbooster or a wider lens. Well there is no perfect camera. This certainly is still a very good one.

[@siebenleben8096]

"Cine4k" Mode (4096x2160), the Crop is x1.04 (25-500mm)

[@TheCameraStoreTV]

Interesting, I'll have to check this out... Jordan @ TCSTV

[@meganvictoria5982]

Yes, I can confirm this. I have not seen a review of this camera yet that has realised this, all of them slating the camera for the crop in UHD 4K and thus putting lots of people off. If you don't want the crop just record in 'Cinema 4K'. The slightly wider aspect ratio (IMO) looks better anyway.

[@Boone2016]

Damn that seagull was inspiring.

[@whothinksforme]

At 7:25 guys like, "who's the creep on the other side of the street taking pictures of me?"

[@NarekAvetisyan]

Fantastic camera.

[@LoightaFluwid]

I was sorry about the other video. I love you too Jordan (mutually)

[@niccollsvideo]

Mild gargle I live off of constant love and attention. Jordan needs constant criticism and neglect so you did just fine. CHRIS@TCSTV

[@JNPhotography]

This video convinced me to buy it! Not hard when Canon are left behind in terms of 4K features... Just uploaded a video mucking about with the insane zoom range

[@NorthOlbo]

You didnt spend much time comparing menu layout and access in the FZ versus the RX. Ive had both in earlier models and found the Panasonic menus more intuitive and easy, the Sony tended to bury important settings and logic wasn't as smooth. Not having seen the FZ2500 any comments on this?

[@genjii931]

Looks like a good option for vloggers, especially with the LCD that flips out to the side, so you can still use external mic on the top and have it on a small hand-held tripod. Plus mic jack AND headphone jack FTW. Plus ND filters. This is really making me look forward to the GH5; Panasonic's products have really matured in the video game. I wish they'd make a video-rich APS-C camera to allow for much better low-light performance, but no idea what mount they could use. Someone needs to come up with another open mount format for APS-C like they did with m43. That might've saved Samsung's NX camera line.

[@prayan72]

Hi and thank you for the very well done review. I own a FZ1000 and I'd like to upgrade to the FZ2500. How do you think the two lenses compare talking about sharpness? Some say the FZ2500 lens is softer than the FZ1000. What do you think? Thank you very much.

[@koolkutz7]

Thanks for the review, very helpful. The FZ2500 looks a chunky, solid camera. Like the touchscreen etc-the stills images look crisp, colourful and detailed, although it seems the highlights get clipped on some pictures. I wish that it had a longer, constant aperture zoom, like the FZ200.

[@seantomlinson3320]

Jordan - it looked a bit bumpy for a change. Not as smooth as I'm used to at points. Testing a new gimbal or steadycam set up?

[@HomesickMac]

Updating my comment, some things are puzzling me. Why doesn't the silent shutter mode stay after changing the photo or filming modes. Each time I have to activate it again. I could understand that this choice gets forgotten when turning the camera off oand on again (although I'd prefer the camera to remember it was off and leave it there). Also, the FZ2000 wouldn't remember my custom WB settings: I change the customizable settings options to different K temperatures and when I get back, they're gone. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, not sure, it's still a very new device for me.. Still love it, great images, even in low light.

[@DGBomber]

Great and informative video, I really like this camera. Is the Dynamic range good compared to say a G85? What would you pick for travel between this and a X-T2 with the 18-135?

[@benec5816]

Great report what's it like now would you still go for it and do you think it is due to be replaced stay safe

[@barryinglaterra]

How's the IBIS? Does it have the same problems the G85 had at release or is it working well?

[@niccollsvideo]

Barry Inglaterra Seems to work perfectly. Not as stable as the G85 though. No issues otherwise. CHRIS@TCSTV

[@abdullahk9801]

Please help 😅 Would the 80d be a good enough camera and how is it compared to the 7d and the 5d on the image quality. I saw your review of it and I got excited about getting it because the 5d is not good with telephoto lenses and the 7dii doesn't have a practical screen. Thanks 😃

[@ScottOwens28]

One big question looming for this cam is what I call, "Micro" jello shake at long tele end combined with the OIS+ 5-axis stabilizer system. As I said in the previous comment, there are very few reviews/previews on this cam that illustrate the critical questions us working Joe's need answered, etc. On several of these short sample FZ2500 YT videos it shows a strange "micro" jellow jitter; Im not sure if it is physical handheld error OR a possible flaw in the combination of both the optical & electrical stabilizer. Again, I've seen this maybe twice and it seems to show at the long end of the focal lengths, etc. Would love to see a test of the 5-axis stabilizer on the FZ2500!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks guys!

[@meganvictoria5982]

This micro jello is the stabiliser working hard, which happens on long focal length hand held shots where the hands are not particularly steady. You see on lots of Panasonic cameras. I saw this on reviews of the FZ1000 but it was never a problem when I had it so long as you hold the camera properly when shooting. The stabiliser, even in 4K, is very good.

[@PeterWalkowiak]

Im bummed you guys didn't talk about the stabilization or the video features.

[@TheMaydayFlyers]

Does it still have the focus hunting that the FZ1000 had? Great review :-)

[@evvivaDio]

Amazing! Finally something better than the RX 10 series! Just one question: Will you do also a LX10/LX15 review? I'm about to buy a G7X m2, but I wanted to understand which one suits best for me! Anyway great video, great review, you always give a complete overview on every camera! Unbeatable!

[@Carmerafe]

evvivaDio you want 4k? Then lx10

[@theSUBVERSIVE]

The FZ1000 was a better value for money and it made Sony come up with the RX10 II sooner than they wanted because of that, FZ1000 not only had 4K compared to the original RX10 but it was much cheaper, in some ways the FZ1000 had already beaten the original RX10. If you don't mind the smaller range and appreciate the extra aperture, the LX15 is a really nice option - even more with 15min 4K video recording while the RX100 is not only more expensive but it only records 4K for 5 min, but at least it has built in ND. The shallow DOF you get in the LX15 is just a shallow as the LX100, which has a bigger sensor, all because of the f/1.4 aperture. Also the LX15 the 5-axis IS which should help with video. I think the LX15 should be better than the Canon G7X II. I didn't dig too deep into this camera but there are already some good reviews out there, I watched some of them but as this is not a camera I want I don't quite remember the pros and cons, so go check them out.

[@evvivaDio]

theSUBVERSIVE thanks a lot, your comment was precious! I've watched many videos, but an overall handling experience (and maybe a comparison to something else but the RX100) is missing! I'm talking about something like jpeg processing, dynamic range, focus speed comparison, not only a "vlog camera" point of view!

[@theSUBVERSIVE]

evvivaDio it's basically the same sensor so DR should be about the same with an edge to the Sonys that have the stacked sensor and copper wiring tech that also has faster readouts. Point to point, as Chris mentioned, the DFD from Panasonic is pretty quick but tracking AF might be better on the newest RX100 - but not so much the older ones, I've seen some vloggers struggling with the AF. Didn't CTSTV review the G7X II? But as they showed it in this video, the LX15 review with the comparisons you want might be coming soon.

[@Odd_Taxi_epi04]

+theSUBVERSIVE: I agree with most of what you said, with a few caveats: the LX15 virtual 5-axis stabilization won't work with 4k video, and it's handling seems it main weak point (as opposed to FZ2000 which seems a masterpiece in this regard). It's lens is also slower than Canon's G7X except for

[@sflxn]

That FS5 video looks great. Which lens?

[@thomassilas9]

Very helpful information. Thanks 👍

[@innerscape]

I have looked long and hard about the V-Log upgrade and think it's a poor show on Panasonic that it's not included it in the price, as I'm sure the GH5 will include this profile, however moving from the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera where you had no option but to grade the image, this camera is a joy to use and to get broadcast quality images at 4K straight out this camera has to be commended, It's by far the easiest I've used in years and love it to bit's.

[@HenryPiffpaff]

I'm so looking forward to the "The Best and Worst from 2016" video!!! Don't get too drunk though ;D Stay cool!

[@MichaelMa]

Are Chris and Jordan full time videographers at The Camera Store? Or do they actually work behind the counter? I always assumed the latter for some reason. But maybe transitioned into full time KZbin content creators for TCSTV?

[@TheCameraStoreTV]

We're usually behind the counter. We shoot one day of the week and do our other testing, editing, etc on our own time. Jordan @ TCSTV

[@aaronharper444]

God bless you guys

[@jeffhampton7405]

TheCameraStoreTV Do you guys own TCS? I always assumed you did, especially since you said you put YT proceeds back into the store, but I heard you reference a boss in another video.

[@Cedar1956]

How is the auto focus in video? Can it track or does it hunt like my GH4?

[@TheCameraStoreTV]

It's noticeably better than the GH4, but still not quite as bullet-proof as the Canon DualPixel AF cameras. Jordan @ TCSTV

[@GabrielFFontes]

Would you say it has better video AF than the RX10 III?

[@MrPetebuster1]

TheCameraStoreTV hi do you think there's much difference iq between the fz2500 and rx10iii?

[@mg428]

Chris, do you think DFD is even better than phase detect AF of, say, A6300, in a) video; b) stills? Do you have a video demonstrating that? You had a comparison video among XT-2, GH4, EM-1 and A6000 which did not have PDAF.

[@GabrielFFontes]

DFD does not work in video.

[@mg428]

Gabriel F Are you sure? In the below link it says "When shooting with our production review unit, the DFD technology worked well, with very quick focus acquisition times. For video recording, the focus transitions between focus distances was precise and smooth with little to not hunting." www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/panasonic-gh4/panasonic-gh4TECH.HTM

[@GabrielFFontes]

To be fair, I read a couple of times that DFD didn't work in video, and assumed it was common sense. Upon a quick search, it seems like I was wrong, or at least it's not commonly stated that DFD doesn't work in video. However, I've tested the FZ1000 and own the RX10 III. The FZ1000 does focus quicker than the RX10 III in stills mode, but in video mode, the AF on the RX10 seems a lot more decisive. It doesn't hunt a lot looking for the right direction to move, so it seems like Sony also employs some technology to aid it's CDAF system. The FZ1000, though, hunts quite a bit more and takes even longer to focus than the RX10 in video. I don't think the FZ2500 would quite compete with PDAF solutions in video.

[@gatto190]

Excellent review! Love me a Panasonic Camera!

[@BalladCreek]

I was Going to Purchase the Sony RX10 III Now Im not so sure, Im not happy about Sony not having the NB filters built in ...plus no touch screen and do I really Need 600mm Zoom ? 480mm Probably does well enough But the Sony does have a bigger aperture Oh Man now I'm not sure what to get...

[@klaastheovaak5254]

Question - is the low light also tested in the dark room contrary to the FZ1000, which was under a blanket kind of, pointed out to be ..too dark... and having strange color distortions? Second question , Would it be good to shoot at Music Stage performances, where lighting poses challenges? Thxs in advance Theo - NL