How a Russian Tactical Nuke on Ukraine Will Destroy Europe And More Information

[@Chris-xo2rq]

Uhh... a 1 kiloton nuke is NOT equivalent to 1000 sticks of dynamite... it is equivalent to 1000 TONS of TNT. Last I checked a stick of dynamite is not as energetic as TNT and does not weigh a ton.

[@goodvibespatola]

Dynamite is 54% stronger than TNT

[@taylorjones5370]

@@goodvibespatola actually TNT is 5-10 times stronger than dynamite

[@semesabrown8203]

​​@@goodvibespatolawhat? Dynamite is tri-nitro-toluene mixed with sawdust or similar... how can you possibly think it's stronger.

[@W1HURI]

@@goodvibespatolasource: delirium

[@excitablepyrolad6678]

no dynamite is nitro glycerine mixed with a safe absorbing agent - probably Kieselguhr or bentonite clay. TNT is trinitro toluene - not sure which is the most powerful I think it depends on the circumstances.

[@wjs569]

Usually enjoy the plausability of your scenarios but Nuking Belarus as a retaliation is not a realistic option. More likely NATO would hit Russian forces in Ukraine with conventional weapons

[@keithstropp6593]

makes sence. millatary targets.

[@jeremypearson9019]

Many analysts have said that they believe that an appropriate response would be for NATO to conduct air and missile strikes on Russian military targets in Ukraine. Even from a distance, NATO could easily destroy the Crimean Bridge, all the Russian ships in the Black Sea, and all the rail infrastructure in occupied Ukraine in just a few weeks or months. Russia's military can't recover from that, and Russia's only reasonable option would be to negotiate a surrender. Nukes don't give much of a military benefit, and they create more problems. Russia knows this, which is why they haven't used nukes yet and why they will never use them.

[@jakekuznetsov8870]

nukes in belarus are not for ukraine silly boy, they are for poland

[@dosa2990]

​@@jeremypearson9019many real world anaylist believe Nato won't do anything. Striking Russian forces even conventionally would invite Russian conventional strikes on critical European energy infrastructure, basically starve Europe into submission in winter. Any escalation further would involve a World War, which is more overdo for something called Ukraine. And that's the most realistic assessment.

[@jeremypearson9019]

@@dosa2990 ??? You're saying that there are serious analysts that believe that NATO would not react if Russia were to use nuclear weapons, simply because they would be afraid of losing energy infrastructure in Europe? I find that very, very hard to believe. There would certainly be a response. There is no red line bigger and more obvious than the nuclear red line.

[@FrankiePhoenix]

You should include the upload dates with the titles in the descriptions as well. With content like this which is always changing, the date uploaded is relevant. I know you do a good job to mention the specific months and year you are refering to in your videos, but i do like to check the date of the upload on all of your videos to make sure i fully get the context.

[@dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820]

The infographics Show has never been very good at their research. They mispresent stuff almost in the every video they make.

[@criticaltheories5222]

@@dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820 no

[@jerelull9629]

If you look, KZbin does that for you. As I write, I checked and found that this video was uploaded yesterday.

[@FrankiePhoenix]

@@jerelull9629 but this is a collection of a dozen of uploads that all came out over the span of months. Some of this content is probably a year old. I understand this was uploaded yesterday, I was there. My comment is from yesterday, as you can clearly see. My issue is with knowing the upload dates of each video while still continuing to watch this video and not make the app close it for another.

[@StephenRooney-q2r]

​@@dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820Can you advise me what is incorrect please? You don't seem to be saying what is incorrect?

[@philiponeill6903]

Could we keep the videos as INFOgraphics, rather than dramatisations? Please?

[@dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820]

As if they never have been that

[@criticaltheories5222]

@@dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820 no you r wrong

[@CoyoteSeven]

Guess you'd better ask for your money back.

[@pleb2dev605]

Needy

[@fgrodriguezqac]

Even if Russia were to use nuclear weapons on Ukraine, NATO will not reply back with nukes of their own. They would definitely reply back but it will use conventional weapons to pretty much destroy all Russian forces within Ukraine territory and also most likely the naval bases in Crimea. But that it is as far as they will be willing to take it.

[@seaofenergy2765]

I wouldnt be so sure. The use of a nuke would be an outrageous provocation and breach of international principles that it would not be able to go unanswered by NATO, otherwise NATO would appear weak. Although i am not very sure about Belarus being chosen as the target for that retaliation.

[@wjs569]

Just posted similar. NATO doesn't need to use nukes and would decimate Russian troops in Ukraine then pull up at the border

[@fgrodriguezqac]

@@seaofenergy2765 I disagree, we hear Biden, German Minister, UK minister, etc say things like “we will stand by Ukraine” but I guarantee you they won’t plunge the world into nuclear winter just for Ukraine, it’s not even a member of NATO, they simply won’t do it. If the attack was on Poland soil or any other NATO member then yes, they are obligated by NATO charter but over Ukraine the most we will see is a massive bombardment of all Russian positions within Ukraine and they will sink as many ships as possible in Sevastopol.

[@rchot84]

This would still lead to an all out Nuclear exchange. Once nato starts destroying russian assets in Ukraine. Russia will eventually launch more tactical nukes even on NATO position. Eventually, one side will launch a first strategic strike.

[@WaVyCroc]

@@rchot84 A Coup would happen in Russia, if Putin gave the gohead on a primitive stike

[@AmraithNR]

Inaccuracies at 10 minutes already? There are russian nukes in Belarus. And what would be the point of dragging them into the war?

[@lonniemcclure4538]

These hours long versions are repackaging of previously uploaded content. That first segment was released long ago.

[@alvinnorin8820]

Did you miss 1:44?

[@stillcantbesilencedevennow]

Tbf, they're already part of it, just not an active one. Or did you think they invaded from the north via teleportation in the opening days?

[@sambassil7825]

Very good analysis, extremely well done.

[@Jim-yz7qf]

This video ignores many other options. Of a nuke is used, NATO will decimate Russian defenses and allow Ukraine to to repel Russian forces . I’m sure we’ve expressed this.

[@dosa2990]

And how does one decimate Russian defenses without attacking them? And all the Russians have to do is attack showcase capabilities to destroy critical energy infrastructure to make any prospects of Europe wide conflict untennable for everyone.

[@ED-es2qv]

Unless a stick of dynamite weighs a ton, I don't think a kiloton explosion is a thousand sticks of dynamite.

[@axeguy3856]

By definition, a kilotonne is 1,000 tonnes of TNT so you are right…unless each stick is a tonne. (I don’t really know if this is metric tonnes or American tons but you’re still right.)

[@beavis5591]

You always get so much wrong.

[@jaythomas3224]

as usual

[@franklinsantiago5212]

What's up?

[@Dsniperking]

I love the design of these video. Keep it up

[@R.S.Shakleferd-hm1td]

If you enjoy wrong information and brainwashing then by all means.

[@Dsniperking]

I like the DESIGN not the information

[@Uapinvestigations]

End the war!

[@nosuchthing8]

Tell Putin

[@tawsifking9336]

you got 2 options either let russia take Ukraine or support ukraine and keep war going until either russia nukes ukraine and starts WW3 or russia pulls out of the war after a long time

[@Eliterum]

russia can't nuke ukraine, even if it wanted to@@tawsifking9336

[@captlazer5509]

​@@tawsifking9336oh nuclear black mail, what other countries are next?

[@tawsifking9336]

@@captlazer5509 china probably

[@ukraine_tbic]

I’d love to see your analytics on the long form videos

[@rayoflight62]

Already watched most of the videos in the compilation. Thank you Infoshow for all your work regarding the ongoing conflict; both about real reporting and analysis of hypothetical scenarios. Greetings, Anthony

[@Dvanreuler]

Putin should watch infographicshow to. ... Hypothetical seen🫣. If he does he would know how to act and change tactics to be able to win. For now it looks like he thinks joining is more important to win. But if he would watch the infographic show , he would realize this is only true for sports and things like that, and not in war. Join more important to win except for war he would realize. I love the I.G show videos , the real and the fictional entertain videos

[@Dvanreuler]

@rayoflight62 , did u also watch the older *u versus....* vids . They are fiction and fun. I want to see Russia verses scp.....something vids or russia versus goku super sayen God, or Russia versus beerus or something like that. As a little laugh and mabey some people forget about the war if people only forget 1 minute or 10 minute to enjoy , then they make a little bit of lives better for some people.

[@stephenchen856]

Never too late to build more underground nuclear bunkers

[@rajshah5705]

Did they really just uploaded a 4 and half hour long video????? 😮😮😮 Christmas came early

[@lonniemcclure4538]

If you regularly view the channel, you'll recognize this as various segments of content that was previously uploaded.

[@Dexanimus]

It’s a recap episode 😂

[@observer7418]

* recap marathon @@Dexanimus

[@EricsTechTalk]

1000 TONS, not sticks, and its tons of TNT, not dynamite. They are not the same thing.

[@Drewsta4]

1 stick of dynamite isn't equal to a Ton of TNT

[@AppliedCryogenics]

Yeah, they're off by like a factor of 4000! One stick is 190 grams.. so it would take 4770 sticks to weigh one ton, but dynamite is more energetic than TNT.. So a kiloton of TNT would be somewhere around FOUR MILLION sticks of dynamite!

[@Heretowatchstuff]

Yeah. A stick of dynamite is just over a 1/2 pound. But I doubt anyone in the blast radius would know the difference.

[@LAKXx]

@@Heretowatchstuff Thing is how can we take the infographics show serious if they do not double check easily verifiable info. this is just sloppy

[@jaythomas3224]

i stop taking them seriously when they dropped a video how Russia lost Bakhmut 1 week after Wagner seized it@@LAKXx

[@vicmorrison8128]

Love the channel!

[@NathanielJr-qh9dq]

Thank you infographic show. Got to love these hours-long content shows you guys have been putting out. Might just be repeats but at least you guys are putting all the same content in the same episode for the most part 🎉❤

[@JohnBerry-q1h]

To me, Putin sounds like an Avengers-level threat. Of course, if the Avengers get involved whenever there is a first sign of trouble somewhere in the world, then the Avengers essentially RULE the world. Therefore, sending in the Avengers should always be reserved as a last resort.

[@goodvibespatola]

1:48 One kiloton is not equivalent to 1000 sticks of dynamite. It's ~6, 256, 400 sticks, each with 108 grams of nitroglycerin. That's as bulky as ~50 average-size construction site dump trucks.

[@iwrotethis1678]

Thanks for clearing that up everyone without a shovel feels alot safer now

[@vegachris19872]

Both of these comments confuse me.

[@iwrotethis1678]

I was suggesting digging a really long hole try to dodge nuke but dont think it works like that

[@jaythomas3224]

i dont put mistakes like that past them.

[@atklm1]

Russia would use tactical nuke in Ukraine and in response NATO would retaliate by launching same on Belarusian soil? That's a whole new level of absurd.

[@cornebod]

Technically a RS-28 Sarmat dropped in a tactical location also counts as a tactical nuke 🤫

[@bekeneel]

what's a tactical location?

[@unknownperson6838]

We're talking 1 kiloton that's 1000 tons of tnt or 2,000,000 pounds of tnt a stick of dynamite might be equivalent of 4 ounces of tnt. So a 1 kiloton nuke is probably 8,000,000 sticks of dynamite. Plus 1 kiloton is probably the low end of tactical nukes.

[@GeoffGroves]

Ok so let me get this straight, are you saying that if the Canadians elected a pro Iranian/ pro Sunni government, and then let Iran and Pakistan install several nuclear capable regiments along the the border near Buffalo, and we decided that it was too dangerous, so we went into Canada and pushed the nuclear regiments back, our President would then be guilty of heinous and wicked crimes against humanity???

[@nsl_black8053]

Yes

[@GeoffGroves]

indeed, and that is the point. Our media would sell an invasion of Canada to us just like they sold us WMD / Iraq and Afghanistan and Vietnam and Korea and ....etc...

[@Prayogi_168]

Please no one uses the proceeds from the nuclear program, Peace ✌️

[@dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820]

Just shows how yet again The infographics Show doesnt know what they are talking about and shouldnt make videos of this serious subjects.

[@AkselGAL]

they are clickbaiting hard nowadays.

[@stephenelliott8927]

This is scaremongering probably from a bedroom war gamer.

[@AlfredMoi]

As the US president stated last year, there are enough conventional means to retaliate the use of nukes.

[@zerofreespeech3002]

Poor fransis he's just a human loving good guy who drives electric vehicles recycles and is a feminist

[@davidfrankenberger4817]

Very good explanation of Russian incompetence. American technology is so much more advanced.

[@GNBAustrian]

Epic, another video! Also first idk

[@PaulKulha]

I love the long content, but I just want to know what would happen, can you make a video that’s not as long about it? Your work is too well done for my brain.

[@nickisnyder3450]

As if this would be first seen in a private briefing, it would be all over the news before they ever got to a private briefing

[@PhilipFranklin-w6o]

Peace ✌️

[@pikmanfan21]

Guys I love you but four and a half hours.. goodness it will take days to get though this. Not to say I won’t get through this

[@stride_news]

Dont scare us european's like that! I cried myself out because of this!

[@thieupham493]

Don't worry, you can count on Switzerland to negotiate a surrender for you.

[@stavrosmegalos]

The whole world is on the brink from a lot of different threats, not just war. If I had to lay down money I would bet we won't be around in 100 years, probably no more than 70 to be honest. We will be in such bad shape by then we will eagerly welcome oblivion.

[@RMartin631]

1 kiloton isn't equal to 1,000 sticks of dynamite. It's equal to 1,000 tons of dynamite. It's equal to 477,000 sticks of dynamite. Each stick usually weighs about 190 grams.

[@dazzassti]

It would if dynamite was equivalent to TNT, TNT has more explosive force than dynamite, there you would need ~1400 tons of dynamite to be equivalent.

[@RMartin631]

@@dazzassti, i really wasn't willing to put that much time into researching this. I got my point across. And that point was that they were way off in their "fact".

[@lorddamon079]

As long as Putin has a daughter walking this earth, I’m not worried

[@nosuchthing8]

Good point

[@ninjaragingpotatoes]

😂

[@sciencemanguy]

*ROSCOSMOS gets an emergency request to shuttle one high profile / important civilian to space*

[@stillcantbesilencedevennow]

Yeah, not like the super rich have bunkers filled with supplies or anything.

[@jerelull9629]

OR that smokin' hot girlfriend!

[@observer7418]

Satmatts and Poseidons have already been deployed to active duty

[@claytonwatts7093]

Apparently this is a movie but unsettling none the less.

[@bwynn09]

Where can I read more about this? I can't find anything.

[@Mike_Davidson]

It’s just a possible scenario. 😂😂😂

[@jasontoddman7265]

Is this a reupload? I am sure I saw this video several months ago.

[@philbenson2186]

Amazing video is a shame weapons are not a hunt for resolution and this could actually happen

[@tywheeler6641]

Please keep on the season 2 of I survived

[@AkselGAL]

Petreus has said in an interview, what the likely response of NATO would be. A guy like Petreus is not saying something like this without coordinating with the Pentagon.

[@c.s.4273]

What did he say?

[@AkselGAL]

@@c.s.4273 Interview is from 2. October 2022 in ABC Quote: Karl asked him if the use of such weapons would require the U.S. to directly intervene in the conflict with NATO. Petraeus said a response might see the U.S. and its NATO allies "take out every Russian conventional force that we can see and identify on the battlefield" in Ukraine, the contested region of Crimea that Russia annexed in 2014 and ships in the Black Sea. "It cannot go unanswered. But it doesn't expand -- it's not nuclear for nuclear. You don't want to get into a nuclear escalation here," Petraeus said. "But you have to show that this cannot be accepted in any way."

[@c.s.4273]

@@AkselGAL Thank you for the clarification.

[@alexandercoll4863]

Love your channel but not a watching 4.5 hour video geez!

[@Davidcallard]

4.5 hours is way too long! If you really need over 4 hours to explain it all (which I seriously doubt), then please give it to us in bite-size chunks because very few of us have this sort of time to devote to a video!

[@thelloyd87]

We had a good run but this is more foreshadowing than just a possibility.

[@lacydoe]

The Zack Snyder version

[@philwithcheese]

1 stick of dynamite is 1 ton? lol

[@StephenRooney-q2r]

And zelensky get training because he would be left with no choice... He would lose respect of every man who has lost a friend or family member... Sword and shield like the old days... See who the real man is? Make everyone know he backed down and was scared... Could his ego take that.... Use it against him?

[@judithbradford9130]

Could Xi not decide it's an ideal time to invade a neighbor.... as long as it's Russia, since they're so big on "historical" borders?

[@robertsnyder7440]

Just so you know as someone who was in the national guard if you unit is deployed the are issued the same gear as active duty only use old gear in day to day operations at are home stations

[@RickSanchez167]

Not in an initial invasion like this. You only got good equipment because of RFI that was set up over 2 decades of GWOT

[@robertsnyder7440]

@@RickSanchez167 both times I was deployed we got the same equipment as active duty that’s all I can say

[@Nutzername36]

10:38 Putin does not use smartphones... or Computers...

[@Justmyownopinion5999]

There are easy answers, close the Baltic sea, and the Suwalki gap. Make Kakingrad Konigsburg again. Let's see if Putin can run his own version of the Berlin airlift.

[@frissonsteemit2318]

Francis better get his shine box

[@loskarajanes]

Why is this video so long compared to most, if not the rest of the video that I have watched from your channel? Please say what do you know...

[@cgaud1n69]

This may be the only step that wakes up Europe. They are sleep walking throughout this entire conflict. Europe can't get out of its own way.

[@W1HURI]

How is europe sleeping? Most european countries are donating what they can to Ukraine

[@AkselGAL]

Maybe you should step up your selection of media and languages.

[@stillcantbesilencedevennow]

​@@W1HURIdonating everything but bodies. Well done. Worked out well the last two times we tried this, didn't it?

[@GigglesD2]

Awake? And what would NATO do at this time? Engage Russia which would trigger WW3? China may not openly back Russia on 100%, if we were to engage them they would enter as well as they despise the US and NATO...also Iran would come in along with North Korea. Even if no one did help Russia, they are the largest holder of nuclear weapons on earth and would use them which is why the West refuses to get involved and further. You think Germany is going to risk thier nation being a field of glass over a corrupt nation like Ukraine? The last thing you want is the West or NATO to get involved. May be fun in Call of Duty but real warfare is not and it would effect us all.

[@MoseleyJon]

What if NATO simply stopped agitating for war against Russia?

[@Davidcallard]

Who or what are you? Because I think that you're sounding very much like a Russian schill to me.

[@roughroad1975]

i feel the desperation..

[@philiponeill6903]

Umm...one kiloton is not "1000 sticks of dynamite." It's 1000 *TONS* of TNT.

[@mishaillich9728]

Saturday!. Western countries believe that it is only a matter of a good package of weapons and ammunition, they forget that the invaders had almost last year to fortify themselves in addition to an arsenal that seemed unlimited. The Ukrainians are slow but they must think that Ukraine is the battle line of all of Europe, without it they would quickly reach the Baltic countries, Moldava, Poland and others.

[@jamieswithenbank1813]

This video shows so much ignorance: 1) Belarus has Russian nukes for self defense (in the same way that Germany has American nukes). 2) Belarus and Russia are part of a "union state" meaning that an attack on one, is an attack on both. - the proposed strike would trigger immediate strikes against the attacking countries - it's a bit like a hybrid of NATO and the EU.

[@ashleyobrien4937]

one thousand sticks of dynamite is not one kilotonne...although I know which one I'd prefer coming at me....

[@neiljohnson6815]

Don't know about Europe, but I'm pretty sure it will destroy Russia.

[@craigsavarese4554]

There are no nukes in Belarus?? The description shows upload of 16 hours ago. This must be an old reposting.

[@LuciferAxolotl]

this is assuming russia has kept their nuclear stockpile maintained given their fleet and tank cuts...

[@jaythomas3224]

whats been cut? They are building more tanks now than before the war

[@vshnrs]

Why would US and NATO need all this to start, go on and develop further in Europe?

[@_smurfitude]

They decide if we live, or die!!

[@Stewart001]

If Russia nuked one city in Ukraine and didn't nuke anymore, would NATO and the US act over it?

[@jacobhansen8015]

Come on, the Hobbit trilogy was excellent. All the additional stuff was from Tolkein's own notes (ie, source material) that helped explaon more of the LotR trilogy

[@laloramirez5665]

putin taking notes on his tablet right now😂

[@pokegamer24278]

i was here 23 minutes after posting

[@ItzLit]

they dont each get a folder?

[@hakes2]

I see pictures of some modern Nato tanks smoking as well..pray for peace ✌️

[@reggiefurlow1]

That's a horrible plan

[@tarassu]

4 hours is too much. Keep it tidy😮

[@juandfabrega1200]

Is this a reupload?

[@alvinnorin8820]

Yes.

[@NAStheNomad]

To be fair, all the evidence points towards Putin being calculated and measured, not a mad trigger happy maniac. Even if that doesn’t make us feel as good.

[@twizzz9675]

4 and half hour video?!

[@StephenRooney-q2r]

It may save a lot of lives, and I think if I was sat dying in a trench having lost my friends, and I seen my leader being offered a fight to end the war and he backed down I wouldnt fight anymore?? If he used a nuke instead of fighting zelensky he becomes a laughing stock!

[@jackwalker9492]

Russian Paratroopers can beat there chests like Tarzan, but are absolutelly incompetetent to an astonishing level. Incompteent is an understatement and Chinese take notice.

[@seaofenergy2765]

I hear one of the reasons progress has been so slow on the zaphorizia front recently is because the russian paratroopers have been rotated there to use elastic defence tactics, which is making it even harder to take ground. So I'm not sure incompetent is correct, and i feel like saying that does the ukrainian soldiers a disservice. They are more competent than standard russian army and hardly an incompetent walkover because by saying they are insinuates ukraine should be beating them a lot more easily than they are.

[@jaythomas3224]

the 400,000 Nato trained Ukrainian soldiers KIA and countless more permanently wounded (amputees) wouldnt call Russia incompetent

[@seaofenergy2765]

@@jaythomas3224 official stats are abou 120k UAF forces killed so far. Where you getting 400k from? Russia's deaths are much higher (~300k), so there is certainly some incompetence going on. Although the Russians never really have put much value in the lives of their soldiers so maybe they just dont care much to keep them alive. More where they came from amirite?

[@jerelull9629]

I liked the comment t that saying the Russian military is incompetent is like saying the ocean is wet.

[@dynjarren5454]

Ahh...again the topic on the thing that should not be Cheers

[@Ruthless13x]

Did this have to be 4 hours

[@TonyOriolo]

I’m not gunna watch this whole 4 hour video. Can someone just summarize it for me?

[@kdkpt]

I honestly really hope that Moscow in St. Petersburg would’ve been absolutely obliterated by strategic nuclear weapons much sooner than this scenario stated.

[@Слава-ц3с1в]

Тогда НАТО перестанет существовать, 7000 ядерных ракет будут запущены программой мертвая рука

[@JMaxwellE]

I’m sure I’m not the first person to comment on it but a kiloton is 1000 tons not 1000 sticks…😂

[@maynamar2517]

How French nuclear weapons can destroy Russia and the United States at the same time? These two countries allied against Europe and the source of all the world's problems at the same time SINCE 1945.

[@robertj5758]

At this point this is just recycled fearmongering. Shame on you, I really appreciated your videos

[@c.s.4273]

1 kt equals ten million dynamite sticks with 100 gram, not just 1000 dynamite sticks.

[@bettercalIsaul]

It looks like it might actually happen. Fasten your seatbelt. Even though, the seatbelt, is useless.

[@rhondathompson3919]

Is this true if not say goodbye

[@jatpack3]

This aged like milk. Ukraine is getting F16 vipers not, Not F16 eagles. Details matter.

[@Midwesternreedneck]

Russians would keep their own men there to make sure we didnt catch on.

[@sammcbride2464]

Electronic parts and chips are what are hurting Russia.

[@jamesmedina2062]

they are acquiring all of the chips they want including US chips

[@sammcbride2464]

@@jamesmedina2062 Not sure about that. The don't have enough to fly 10 planes.

[@jamesmedina2062]

@@sammcbride2464 I am not witness. It's just what the missiles and bombs that have been launched recently and dissected, containing US-made computer chips and electronic parts. I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Russia was bypassing export sanctions via 3rd parties.

[@sammcbride2464]

@@jamesmedina2062 It can try, but it is not the same technology that we use. This is the same issue that happened after WWII with Toshiba and 3 angle props for submarines. We are at the same cold war technology control of back then.

[@peterj.fallon4327]

1.Should be *no confidence any of their missile’s work-require extensive maintenance & tech upgrades; as we’ve seen, they weren’t even able to rotate the tires of their armored vehicles to prevent sun damage 2. The US knows exactly where Putin is at all times-we’re listening to his phone calls, reading his emails, etc. He’s been told in no uncertain terms if he uses one, the US isn’t going to send any to any Russian city or infrastructure, we’re going to send one at HIM directly. He lives like a literal Czar, he does not want to die

[@dosa2990]

You have overdosed on Zeilen and his antics it seems

[@victorrenerio7050]

Brotherman can make 10 videos but instead uploads a 4,5h non sense novel all together

[@humblewarrior773]

That does not make any sense to hit Belarus. Wildly imaginary.

[@ether_sect]

Putin must leave this existence.

[@MarcusPearl]

17:35 Able Archer*