What if the United States Never Entered World War 2

The world would be a completely different place had the US sat out on the sidelines for World War 2. Check out how things might have unfolded if America never got involved in WW2!
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► kzbin.info...
🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► / theinfographicsshow
Discord ► / discord
Facebook ► / theinfographicsshow
Twitter ► / theinfoshow
💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
www.theinfographicsshow.com
📝 SOURCES:pastebin.com/XtTWdVdg
All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

[@nathanseper8738]

It's really frightening how America, due to its isolationism, came very close to not intervening.

[@1216jimmyz]

@@lu544 so we should have just ignored that hole pesky Pearl Harbor thing then, right?

[@nathanseper8738]

@@lu544 You are being deliberately obtuse!

[@PrinceIsot]

@@lu544 that's the problem with people like you

[@PrinceIsot]

@@lu544 and just what do you think would happen if Germany defeated all of the free world you dunce?

[@arcturionblade1077]

@@nathanseper8738 Hey, that's not fair. Lu is also being acutely ignorant to boot.

[@benroos14]

Great episode! Although Germanys navy was never strong enough to launch a attack on the beachs of the UK. They knew this and tried to bomb them into submission because they knew they couldn't make a beachhead

[@DavidL1986]

Makes you think if they took us out at Dunkirk tho, we’d have no army to fight if they did land. Perhaps Germany wouldn’t even need to confront our navy

[@kordellswoffer1520]

@@DavidL1986 the bef was only a third of all British army. The rest was mostly infantry but irrelevant.

[@Vandelberger]

Agree, it was not an incompetent decision to not attack Normandy, there was nothing in the area that would effectively take the beaches. Rommel had surrounded the French, true, but even he wasn’t crazy to assault a beach with 350,000 men. Even the creation of Vichy France, shows that Germany was not ready for its own success yet, lol.

[@kordellswoffer1520]

@@cmckown7932 lol no. There was no chance of the Germans destroying the navy as they lacked both the ability and skill and their enemies had capable anti air defenses. The Germans would be badly beaten even if they destroyed the Raf. There was little chance of them achieving air superiority anyways.

[@Turvold]

The fatal mistake was after taking out most of the RAF through bombing raids to turn and decide to attack London and other civilian centers just because the British bombed Berlin allowing the British to rebuild and with the invention of radar and the cracking of enigma the British could now know when the Germans were coming.

[@Flaris]

I know this was about the US. But I was curious how Canada sitting right on top of the US was fairing under these scenarios. Kind of felt like a missed opportunity to neglect the country that was both in NA and still at war with Germany in these scenarios.

[@BurdenofTheMighty]

It’s true. Canada held an important role in WW2

[@katleeshue]

I guess whatever Britain does we'll follow suit.

[@bkh8528]

Well considering that Canada was part of the British commonwealth they were basically told what to do by the British empire and it’s ruling Monarchy………….. just saying……..

[@shane_7even_ten569]

Canada was involved before the states

[@larrylambert1220]

I would like to know what happens to South America.

[@jonisalmela2399]

I think you guys overlooked the British commonwealth, canada, Australia etc. Also I think sealion would have been pretty much impossible anyway.

[@tylercarney3914]

Sorry but Australia wasent even top 10 for army navy etc in ww1-2 Canada wasent much power ful either mainly cause of there snow being isolated around the us even tho they where allies Australia and Canada where not very powerful cause before Canada and the us got involved Germany swept France took Poland and obviously later in the war the east side of the red army/soviet union where Stalin had to move to the west and Moscow and more where tacken but Australian and Canada where not very good they are in the top 6 now fs

[@gdaycunt2001]

@@tylercarney3914 speak some sense mate

[@lakshaybansal5337]

What about India?

[@alistairgrey5089]

Canada and Australia were already involved in the war. Some of the first attempts to establish a foothold in Europe were Canadian forces. Unfortunately both countries had very little in the way of military equipment and personnel. They helped but were not major contributing factors.

[@good7saint]

@@tylercarney3914 I suggest you come to Liverpool and look at the Canadian names on the memorial for the fallen Canadians

[@WMassOutdoors]

Look forward to your episodes all the time. Especially the alternate reality ones. Keep up the GREAT work

[@catherinejohnson1354]

But its a reality where America is always the saviour when it most definitely is not

[@datcheesecakeboi6745]

My man makes america out to have the best soldiers

[@alekj3104]

What if Poland never entered WW2? Germany: I declare war on you! Poland: I don't recognize this

[@DoctorDeath147]

Germany attacked without declaring war so

[@jrdsm]

poland never entered ww2, ww2 entered poland

[@skyreelz]

Poland : 🗿

[@oliversherman2414]

I love your channel keep up the great stuff!

[@Gingerboi2010]

I like how the British government said that they were the reason Dunkirk was successful but it was actually what remained of the French army that set up a perimeter and fought to the last man to stall for time

[@rossmackenzie2367]

if the British didn't send the mass of ships, there would have been hundreds of thousands of more deaths

[@tylerchapman9234]

Is that what actually happened?

[@strongbrew9116]

Kind of half correct. There were French divisions who held their ground which bought time for the evacuation at Dunkirk, but there were British divisions holding the line too, such as the British 5th division involved in the heavy fighting at the Battle of the Ypres-Comines Canal. All in all, 3 main reasons why Dunkirk succeeded was 1) The French who stayed and defended their sectors 2) The Royal Navy managing 50,000-70,000 evacuated per day from day 3 onwards 3) Hitler's infamous halt order.

[@jameshagan2832]

@@tylerchapman9234 the French laregly provided the cover to allow the british to withdraw back to England. Had France surrendered earlier (they were done by dunkirk) the vast majority of Britain's continental army would have been captured and maybe Britain could hold out because they still controlled the air and the sea but the war likely would have gone on longer as they rebuilt their army/waited until the us got in

[@coinneachreid8971]

It should also be mentioned that the British were able to evacuate a further 144,000 personnel from various French ports (Operation Aerial), after Dunkirk fell. This was in no small part due to the defeated French continuing to fight to facilitate this. However as mentioned by @ Strong Brew Der Halte Befehl was probably the biggest strategic mistake of WWII

[@ives3572]

"A point has been reached where the peoples of the Americas must take cognizance of growing ill-will, of marked trends toward aggression, of increasing armaments, of shortening tempers, a situation which has in it many of the elements that lead to the tragedy of general war. Peace is threatened by those who seek selfish power." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

[@shivarghabhattacharya8796]

I would love more Alternate History Scenarios

[@Triclips]

Great video thanks

[@timothyhenson8853]

Best vids to watch while doing ANYTHING!

[@ares01397]

Only if Germany wouldn't have invaded USSR and Japan not attacked pearl harbour...

[@jeffreyval9665]

If they were able to defeat the British the Soviet invasion probably would of went alot different. No strategic bombing from the U.S. and British. Way more men and supplies to take on the Russians.

[@rubieowo]

No, only if Germany didn't obey the tripartite pact like Japan didn't when they declared war on the USSR

[@irongrid4682]

if Japan had continued attacking their enemy which was Russia I think they would have stood a chance

[@ares01397]

Germany and Japan should have together attacked USSR...would have been a sure shot victory

[@rubieowo]

@@ares01397 Especially since the Siberian troops with proper clothing near the Moscow front would never arrive and a lot of Soviet equipment would be bogged down in Siberia

[@MUSIC4EVA55]

If the United States hadn't entered the war, it would have taken the Soviet Union an extra year to push all the way to the coast of Normandy.

[@strangerthingsfan5601]

Us literally suplied soviets with hella equipment stalin said without us we would've lost

[@ihabland1201]

nazis were 5o miles from moscow at the time

[@qwertrop639]

@@ihabland1201 yeah so that is factually incorrect. Germans were near Moscow in 1941 but when d-day happened ussr already pushed them back from all of it territories and began to attack the germany itself

[@INoticeTooMuch1]

@@qwertrop639the Germans were in Belorussia and Ukraine when D-day occurred.

[@LazzieMazzie]

this is actually true IF american never supplied ussr with lot of stuff it could have taken 1 or 2 more years to actually get better equipment to the soldiers and tanks but that doesn't mean that USSR would have collapsed no they would have continued the fight for so long as they can

[@caitlin30851]

Love your videos

[@ives3572]

"Perfectionism, no less than isolationism or imperialism or power politics, may obstruct the paths to international peace. Let us not forget that the retreat to isolationism a quarter of a century ago was started not by a direct attack against international cooperation but against the alleged imperfections of the peace." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

[@Thesaurcery4U2C]

Ives.. Wow I'd never heard this one. I really enjoy a statement that has your thoughts racing from observation to idea and reality in such a small amount of words. I found myself a little light headed, going over it at full speed the first run.

[@gamingwitharlen2267]

I wish more KZbin channels would explore the scale of the Sino-Japanese war like The Armchair Historian.

[@serbian8323]

agreed

[@michelleken.]

There's actually a very interesting mini-series, "The Plot Against America", made about this, in a very, very realistic alternate history, where Lindbergh actually wins the presidential elections (where he participated in irl btw), not intervening in the war, and driving the USA more towards an anti-semitic fascist society, that is actually more friendly with the Nazi's than it is completely neutral. Thank God this is just an alternate history and did not happen in real life!

[@marlonmoncrieffe0728]

...The Plot Against America? Well-acted but so dull, in my opinion.

[@michelleken.]

@@marlonmoncrieffe0728 my father thought about it the same way and thought it was rather boring. I can understand that, but I actually liked very much and was constantly tense. The reason why a lot of people think it's a little dull is because it's just so realistic I guess...

[@Queen_Miku]

sadly some other universe probably had that happen

[@Queen_Miku]

@Big Daddy why?

[@Queen_Miku]

@Big Daddy we joined ww2 for revenge on japan, alongside germany threatening the usa so we had quite a problem with them both

[@willweed6168]

Good vid

[@aarona1895]

Can you please do more of these?

[@Trumpmugshot678]

Imagine people go to war for a random object in the sky that controls the tides.

[@pyrrhicvictory4115]

Europa the last battle is a good documentary on the subject.

[@gracekruger76]

This is very thought through. Great video

[@GuyLeDuece]

Infographics is OBSESSED with Hitluuuuur and the Nazeeeees

[@Mark-xh8md]

Disappointing how the end is basically "Don't worry, the good guys win in the end anyway".

[@oliversherman2414]

Could you maybe do some alternate WW1 scenarios on this channel? I feel like alternative WW2 history is covered a lot

[@brokenbridge6316]

Interesting video

[@Aginor88]

Interesting topic.

[@desmondmiller5244]

I really appreciate your videos, I'm a very knowledgeable person in my own right and you keep bringing videos of things I know little to nothing about. Thank you

[@sulimaniii]

haha everything u watch isn't what you think it is, ''the history is written by winners'' you aren't that knowledgeable as you claim.

[@desmondmiller5244]

@@sulimaniii history is white washed by white lies, so maybe you aren't as knowledgeable as you think you are. One has to be ignorant to think everything on this show is real when it clearly says "WHAT IF". And if winners are the only ones allowed to write history then a lot of "history" had been forgotten.

[@sulimaniii]

@@desmondmiller5244 a Knowledgeable person won't claim that he is knowledgeable. plus as I said history is written by the Winners. and I didn't claim I'm knowledgeable learning will never stop, and the thing I said isn't about what IF just the historical events.

[@NandiCollector]

*This 'what if' video reminds me of my all time favorite (alternate history) TV series, The Man in the High Castle.' Is just awesome to watch.* I recommend also the newly TV series 'For All Mankind.' ;)

[@rajveerjadhav5537]

Look the video is superb!! I just wanted to know, which background music is used here😅

[@rayoflight62]

What happened to the background orchestral music at 11:20 ? It sounds like you were playing a vinyl LP, and someone slowed it down with a finger. Or if you use a digital device, is like somebody changed the pitch of an A note from 440 to 435 Hz. The video is captivating, thank you. I had already heard, from some historians, about the alternative scenario where US remained neutral. Regards Anthony P.S. please consider a second part for your video "100 Days - The Fallout" . Thanks...

[@tylerchapman9234]

I had no idea that we had supplied the Soviet Union in such a massive way.

[@lukagreblo7884]

Bc you didn't, the American ambassador to the Soviet Union said that only one quarter of what the lend lease program promised get to the Soviet Union, most of the material was in verre bad conditions. And even if all the promises had come and in good condition it would have made only 7% of the Soviet Union war effort

[@Anonymous-qj3sf]

@@lukagreblo7884 I agree

[@averagejoe112]

@@lukagreblo7884 even Stalin, Kruschev, and zhukov admit they would have lost if not for Lend Lease.

[@dessertlimbo]

the US is the definition of that guy in the group that does nearly nothing and claims the rewards

[@MikeYm98875]

@@dessertlimbo glory thieves man

[@Uchihamadara2255]

I hate people who really downplay ussr in ww2 they carried the whole war lol

[@Anonymous-qj3sf]

This is really insane... 80% of all German losses were on the EASTERN FRONT, as were ALL of the fierce battles. In Stalingrad alone, the Germans lost more soldiers than on the entire Western Front.

[@averagejoe112]

@@Anonymous-qj3sf lend lease determined this was a lie. cope.

[@MikeYm98875]

@@Anonymous-qj3sf 5 parts to war , ground , naval , air , intelligence and logistics, you work out the rest

[@grantfreeman4656]

Having the most deaths doesn’t mean you carried the entire war. Most of their deaths came from disease and poor logistics whereas most allied deaths came from combat and capturing strategically important locations

[@trevon_thedragon4034]

They really didn’t carry the whole war they allied with them and then got completely blasted. Up until like 1943. They were just lucky that America got involved or the Germans could have simply fought them the entire time the Russian would have broke eventually if all fire power was focused on the east.

[@NotIn_Water]

If the US never entered WW2 then it would be a live-action of Wolfenstein

[@blastbomb8344]

Part 2 plsssssss

[@Yeetusdeleetus979]

Honestly tbh Russia was the main reason they lost not America. If Germany didn’t betray the no. Aggression pact and left Russia alone, they would have won.

[@prodog69420]

USA was bombing German Industry and the Germans would have won against USSR without america

[@noahniskala]

Mostly Uk France and USA did the heavy lifting they weakened Germany even more when they invaded USSR which helped them push back, Also the USA supplied the Soviet union heavily making them win

[@MikeYm98875]

​@@AnthonyKochubeywot about navy and airforce

[@dallassmith9617]

I'm so glad you elaborated for everyone how awful Lindbergh was. He was just a straight up P.OS.

[@theocjr.43]

And was reviled as a national hero.

[@jeffreysommer3292]

@@theocjr.43 And he received the Order of the German Eagle from Goering. Just goes to show...

[@willweed6168]

Just like Ford.

[@jag92949]

If he was elected President, he wouldn’t have been a pacifist and joined the war with the Axis. He’d help Britain and the USSR fall, and do a ground invasion of Canada.

[@raidermaxx2324]

hopefully people will start to realize that about Donald Trump, who is also down with "America First" and white nationalism...

[@nielfindlay705]

I just love these alternate histories... please do a video on South Africa remaining a colony of The UK... if at all possible...

[@Djsqish1234]

What software do you use for your animations

[@CassieAngelica]

I love how folks like this always downplay the roles of the Soviet Union and England in WW2. American Exceptionalism 101.

[@AceofAcre]

No one is downplaying anything except you

[@dpac956]

Yes, USSR was the backbone of Allies but they never got deserved credit, guess who came late and showered in it?

[@beastki7424]

@@AceofAcre I played with your down bad mom

[@nelswolf]

I agree with soviet union. But England wouldn't of survive without their colonies

[@ChrisZukowski88]

@@dpac956 so you're telling me soviet tyranny post war wasn't a thing? Ok

[@turtledan2513]

I was excited when man in the high castle went into production. They ruined that real quick lol

[@samuilnachev6407]

One thing that’s missing is talking about Italy and the other axis members like italy,Hungary and Bulgaria what happens to them

[@robertbrazier5097]

What if Germany had completed Plan Z before the outbreak of WW2?

[@mrthomas2847]

I still feel history keeps ignoring what happen in USSR, look in WW2 losses and you see the main force to beat Germany was USSR, legit the allies only faced the left overs that Germany could spare from the front against USSR.

[@deanokelly29]

So allies bombing Germany had nothing to do with it . Or the all the hardware given to Soviet Union or UK no going under to Germany if they did no invasion of mainland Europe no USA in war lol so Soviet Union would have gone under

[@andrewmiller1123]

Uh no, yea they beat a big force but it wasn't only them

[@averagejoe112]

The big winner of WW2 was the US economy.

[@samuelfagbemi8851]

The Soviet union could not defeat germany without U.S supply and British air interruption

[@peterbaker8443]

Dude we supplied both the uk and Russia and fought on two fronts in two different continents and still won

[@AceofAcre]

This is why Helping Ukraine and Taiwan is so important same situation different countries

[@arcturionblade1077]

Exactly. Appeasement never works with murderous autocratic dictators like Putin and Xi. The world should've done more when Russia invaded and took Crimea back in 2014.

[@justsomeguy2743]

Should also be helping Palestine people forget about this aswell but because both the uk and us are sweet on Israel they won’t do anything

[@AceofAcre]

@@justsomeguy2743 youre right

[@TXHEN1]

Yes but people are so uneducated that they don't see this.

[@masonpyle5929]

@@justsomeguy2743 A lot of Americans are pro-Israel so that won’t happen.🇺🇸🇮🇱

[@patboi9384]

Did anyone else at 3:25 hear “a serious robux”😂

[@dusty9618]

Still watching miss ya

[@jeffreysommer3292]

Funny how you made the British planes look like Zeroes...

[@sushrutasengupta1273]

2:10 Europe loves to go to a major war in every 20 years....This was Dank 😀

[@PremiumGasoIine]

Love the info show

[@IlliterateSage]

If you like this video, go find the book "In The Presence of Mine Enemies" by Harry Turtledove. While not totally identical to the scenario in this video, it's close. That story takes place in a world where Germany won WWII, and follows a family in Berlin who is secretly Jewish.

[@Leo-wz5xi]

Here we go again Americans praising themselves again* what if we were not"

[@kashmir3489]

In 1963, KGB monitoring recorded Soviet Marshal Georgy Zhukov saying: "People say that the allies didn't help us. But it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us materiel without which we could not have formed our reserves or continued the war. The Americans provided vital explosives and gunpowder.

[@PhilipLeitch]

Americans should know that "supplies to Britain" and "support to Britain" were all at profit. The US "lend lease" cost the UK so much it took decades to recover from the war and almost a century to repeat the debt. America's support in WWII came at an enormous cost.

[@abel_underwater]

Are you serious? The Marshall Plan to this day hadn’t been paid back expect by only a few countries. If US wanted they really could’ve gone after what was rightfully theirs, but let many European countries off the hook, so hold your horses chief

[@PhilipLeitch]

@@abel_underwater yes I'm serious. Did you know that the UK was paying America back for WW2 "support" until the end of 2006? Is that moral? The US made about 840 billion dollars (in today's money) per year during WW2 "supporting" those who later became Allies. This is a stain on the history of America that most Americans don't even know about: that America didn't consider Nazis bad enough to actually take action against and instead profited from those countries who did consider Nazis invading other countries as unacceptable.

[@jKDC1987]

@@abel_underwater The British paid its war debts/loans back in full. America only came in because Japan forced them to do so. This channel is and always has been American propaganda and doesn’t actually focus on facts, only the ones that make the USA look great.

[@abel_underwater]

@@jKDC1987 bro I get that, I’m agreeing with you. I love the Brits so much, greatest allies, and brothers in the entire world. Along with Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and other Anglo countries. The US isn’t the one you should be taking it out on, since we’ve been fighting together for so long, but our adversaries instead like Russia and China. Cmon man…

[@pieterveenders9793]

@@abel_underwater The question should be, are you serious? The Marshall plan was nothing but a way for the US to buy influence in European domestic affairs, a way to strong arm utterly destroyed and starving European countries into doing whatever the US wanted, or else be cut off and starved into submission. So don't go acting as if it was all given out of the good of the US' heart. Conveniently you seem to have forgotten the many billions of Euro's worth of gold from multiple European countries that are still in US vaults which the US refused to return, likely because they illegally spent those countries gold in secret and without permission.

[@TheAlfredos705]

nice

[@aarongillen4745]

Please do an episode on Vasily Arkhipov?

[@adammitchell3462]

When they compare how much goods were given to the USSR during the war, the print reads 11.5 million blankets but the orator say 1.5 million blankets. Not being critical, just observitive

[@guywithahoodie1409]

Good eye!

[@vilecreature5801]

Imagine a "Cold War: Fascism vs Democracy. USA vs Germany scenario". Would be an awesome concept for a movie or a video game.

[@ethanalexander4698]

You on to something

[@JayJayJoestar]

Holllly

[@kurnma3776]

well theres 2 hoi4 mods to satiate that need

[@vilecreature5801]

@@kurnma3776 you mean tno?

[@AidenZhu-uc7id]

One other thing. Since Canada is near USA, Canada might sacrifice territory for protection and also Canada has a small, but tough military, and the us made the nuke with Albert Einstein befor the war started, so it has a huge advantage

[@nitro8678]

Can you please do an episode on what if the oil crisis never happened

[@eaphantom9214]

05:19 - Our finest historical moment in the war! 😃 RAF 🇬🇧🛩️ v 🛩️🇩🇪 Luftwaffe

[@alanboyd3579]

And despite what the video said we did it without any significant help from the USA!

[@MikeYm98875]

@@alanboyd3579 lol trust me , usa and thier loans , nobody cares if it was to be paid for

[@AlbertaGamer]

Canada is another country that was vital to winning the war. We kept the UK alive in the Battle of the Atlantic and our pilots ripped a chunk out of the Luftwaffe, and we also trained the US pilots that won the war in the Pacific.

[@alanboyd3579]

Also, Canada did a lot of convoys escorting during the Battle of the Atlantic. I also read somewhere that the British got more of their supplies from Canada than to the USA before lend lease became operational. Canada is unfortunately overlooked during WW2 and WW1.

[@theog700]

🇬🇧❤🇨🇦

[@dannygjk]

@@alanboyd3579 When a country is less powerful it's contribution gets downplayed.

[@trollpenguin6713]

@@dannygjk the scenario was USA should as the solely superpower in the western hemisphere, other competitor should fall even their allies should not had equal treaties . if you look at post worldwar, USA kick the UK out for nuclear research post-manhattan project. UK was angry with this, it is like a theft. Don't forget crisis Suez, USA threat the UK to withdraw from Egypt that's mean British Empire officially "done". In Falkland war, USA initially told the UK to let Argentina had the islands before turned their support to UK. USA is like snake 🙂

[@reagafranros]

Ya I think we would have been just fine without the Canadians. Thanks for playing tho!

[@joshmorris5468]

Do you know about the enigma code we cracked and about the radars Britain had in ww2 so their aircraft would have the advantage

[@L3GIT349]

Narrator: "1.5 Million blankets." The video: "11.5 million blankets."

[@FFA441]

“The two sides are ideologically opposed” was def written by someone who hasnt paid attention to American politics ever

[@fot6771]

The theory that Germany could've magically starved out Britain, beat the RAF, or the Royal Navy, is completely ridiculous for many reasons. US aid or not. I'll try to keep this short but it's pretty hard to tbh. 1. The German Navy couldve beat the Royal Navy over time? is this a joke? I don't think this is even worth an argument. 2. During the Battle of Britain. British fighter production was double the Germans', as well as very serious strategic advantages with Radar, and Dowding's methodical strategy that was far ahead of what Goring could think of. This was all in 1940 and early 41, before the US lend lease act. 3. Germany had next to 0 ambphibious invasion experience against peer adversaries or good enough landing equipment, and certainly nothing that could've put a good enough dent in the coastal defences of southern England. 4. Because of the Royal Navy blockades, the German economy was forever in decline because of critical resources like oil, fertiliser, rare metals and foreign machine part imports. The only way Germany could possibly overcome this is if the Soviet Union supplied them resources forever at a cheap price (for many reasons, this would never last long). 5. The only possibility of the axis crippling Britain would be a takeover of the Suez canal. As impressive as Rommel's achievements were, the North Africa campaign was a total strategic disaster for the axis from start to finish. Britain completely humiliated the Italian military in nearly every engagement that ever happened in the Mediterranean. And all the Afrika Korps could do is weep as a fraction of their needed supplies barely survived transit. 6. The U-boat threat was completely overrated and on a strategic level did barely anything to harm Britain's supply routes. They had temporary successes for some periods, but in the tech arms race, they became easier to counter as time went on. 75% of U-boat crews were killed and infact German U-boats were much more successful in WW1, but even then they still failed. 7. Britain was far ahead of the German nuclear program. The help from the Americans truly saved alot of lives and is greatly appreciated, but Germany conquering England is complete fantasy.

[@papaheniz6512]

Man’s really called the Chinese unsophisticated 💀😂

[@raul88.88]

I'd suggest you to read the Man in the High Castle

[@tannertodman9228]

In the final scenario, Germany could have also maybe tried to attack Canada. Unless the president was still protecting Canada. Then that would dumb.

[@catherinejohnson1354]

Canada does not need American protection. We did very well in WW1 and 2 thank you very much. We didn't sit back like the selfish cowards did in America

[@c_tsu]

@@catherinejohnson1354 what excuse me? America supplied literally all of its allies and it literally took care of the pacific barely on its own! US was literally part of many operations to free Europe, just admit it you're just one of those american haters that cant accept the fact that US was actually a big part of WW2.

[@kordellswoffer1520]

@@c_tsu but they didn't do it alone. The British and the Dutch as well as others all played important roles in the defeat of the Japanese. The British eastern fleet was larger than Japan's and Dutch submarines played an important role in crippling and hurting Japanese supply lines and logistics. America did the bulk work because they focused mostly on the pacific. The uk and Canada did almost all of the work in the Atlantic and almost the British alone did the work in the Mediterranean. These nations focused on different things and helped each other in other fields.

[@samthesuspect]

Haven't started watching this yet, but I feel like as a historian, this is going to make me cringe a bunch.

[@bradyexe3238]

Yeah, that's me when I watch infographics. And it's kinda sad that everyone in the comments are saying how they're learning so much. I don't doubt they're learning a lot, but what they're learning isn't true

[@samthesuspect]

@@bradyexe3238 I mean there is a lot of truth to what they say here, but Japan and Germany had next to no cooperation in actual world war II, what makes them think that they would work together to fight Russia? And even without the lend lease, assuming the Brits stayed in the war, the Russians would have eventually rolled over the Germans. Lend least didn't come into full support until after they had stopped the German push. At that point they had already moved all their industries to the other side of the Ural mountains and the Germans were never going to cross those, if they had it would mean their supply lines would have had to cross about 1/6 the entire expanse of the world. So no, then lease means the work goes on for another 16 months, there's probably no major D-Day landing unless the British can convince the Canadians to send a lot more troops than they did, because the Australians and Indians had about enough.

[@Mattie11]

@@bradyexe3238 This is an extremely American demographic tho, they see "AMERICA BEST AMERICA ONLY GOOD COUNTRY" and they are sold.

[@GamerBully]

Love to watch a vlogging through history reaction to this.

[@tropxz4]

@@Mattie11 I mean America on top tho

[@candidate3512]

10:25 soviet never talks abt this. And also even with that supply they can somehow manage to steal them from the soldiers. soviet 3 slices cutter machine is wild

[@roxhunter001]

This is a wild thumbnail to open KZbin to💀

[@jesperjensen7665]

There was no way the Germans could pull off sealion because of the British Navy. I would say the battle over Britain would have been worse off however Germany switched targeting military targets to targeting civilian targets allowing the RAF to get back on its feet. All this would keep the UK in the fight which would eventually allow the USSR to finish off Germany. The US did send alot of aid to USSR but Soviet resilience and the fatal unprepared Germans for winter would allow the Soviets to have time to prepare a good defence like they did in reality.

[@paytonwirtjes523]

The Germans switching to civilian targets was soley because they had all but eradicated the royal air force. America allowed the RAF to get back on thier feet. Basically Britain was asking for america to build thier spitfires and ship them, since almost all thier means of Homeland production was destroyed. They asked america for 50 planes, and in america a man that worked for ford was brought in and he removed the wings and stacked the planes vertically, and hung them in the bays of the transpo ships. So that instead of 50 complete planes, He allowed for america to send 300 planes, in mostly built pieces instead of 50 fully built ones. This wasn't immediately realized by the German air force. So by the time they realized what was happening the us had already put Britain from the brink of defeat, to matching attrition, to overwhelming numerical advantage. After the meaningfully time to counter had passed. America did much the same to overwhelm advanced German armor. It was said a German panzer could take out 3 American tanks. So we used our manufacturing to send 5 to 1 numbers against germany

[@tombrady6596]

The US disrupted German supplies that stopped them from bombing Moscow with artillery. You would also be contending with Japan and their “kamikaze”. The Japanese also had a sizable navy.

[@jesperjensen7665]

@@tombrady6596 Bro the Germans still had shells mah guy. Also what's this talk about the Japanese Navy? Like the US could threaten the main land because they devistated the Japanese Navy in Midway. The Germans just could not do that to the British Fleet

[@Polish-Phoenician]

POV: You didn't pay attention to history

[@SomeGuy-up4yz]

That's like this dude's entire channel. It's amazing how this site just promotes flat-out disinfo and unhealthy obsessions like 24/7.

[@jamesm568]

It's also interesting how Germany became so powerful.

[@chadlad4223]

there was a miniseries base off of this!

[@TruthSeeker1453]

Next Infographic Episode 'How to go to sleep after Nuclear War'

[@suleymanguzel7025]

I think this is highly underestimated. Without the USSR the end would have had a much more different perspective of what we know now.

[@Acousticmf123]

@The Senate but i doubt they could actually lend lease thousands of american equipment to actually make a huge different

[@Uchihamadara2255]

@The Senate the lend lease was just little percentage of soviet military

[@suleymanguzel7025]

I doubt they were supplied with everything

[@averagejoe112]

@@Uchihamadara2255 30% of their air force, 30% of all food, 30% of all trucks, 80% of railcars and rail repair/construction equipment? 5% of tanks? Without that the USSR would have lost. Even Stalin admitted this.

[@donm5354]

It would be like THE EMPIRE in STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE where the AXIS Powers won WW II

[@catherinejohnson1354]

The Empire is Star Wars, not Star Trek

[@Tno_is_a_great_mod]

Why does the thumbnail nail look so simalar to Wolfenstien's new order trailer?

[@aloysiusoh197]

Ok so if this scenario even happened, the USA would either be the literal unstoppable superpower, or the world is dead

[@MountainDuwu]

Nothing would change, that’s what. The USSR would have still beat them. Albeit a few years later. They were already pushing them back before they joined, America joining only made it faster.

[@eridjonavdulaj2386]

Without America And Winter , USSR would be German Land 😉

[@MountainDuwu]

@@eridjonavdulaj2386 yes but winter doesn’t just stop, the USSR was already beating the Germans, no? During the winter they beat them, and they held the ground during the summer. The only thing America joining did was prevent a communist takeover. They made Western Europe capitalist.

[@eridjonavdulaj2386]

@@MountainDuwu Stalin Said himself that , the USSR could Not have won WW2 Without the Help of the Allies 😉. Accept the truth Kid !!!

[@MountainDuwu]

@@eridjonavdulaj2386 Just because he said it doesn't mean he meant it. he also said a lot of other things that weren't true. We have no way of knowing what would have happened, but *at the time* they were WINNING!

[@eridjonavdulaj2386]

@@MountainDuwu No Stalin just Said the truth 😉 . Accept the truth Kid

[@teejaye6226]

If Lindeburgh was alive now he would certainly get the gop nomination.

[@Villagebutcher]

the thumbnail reminds me of wolfenstein TNO

[@danholm4952]

maybe we would have health care for all like other developed countries?

[@adamjhauber]

😂😂😂😂

[@hiddenname9809]

wrong video, bud.

[@chicken_cranberry]

The immediate response I'd give would be that the United States would be seen as a nation to be taken advantage of since Japan would've started claiming more and more land than what they already claimed (that being parts of China, Russia, Korea, plus more)

[@billcat1840]

Were those British Zeros at 5:00? 🤣

[@blackpainty3048]

Bro the thumbnail is low-key the same as one the Wolfenstein trailer’s

[@chaabraaah5823]

I love how in the end they just assume Germany wouldn't have the smartest scientists, pretty sure it was their scientists we looked past war crimes for them to create our tech. I mean I'm American and I love my country, but to pretend like Germany hasn't had some of the best and brightest is absurd.

[@kordellswoffer1520]

Everything about this video is absurd.

[@kirby747]

it assumes that racist americ would have allowed minority scientists to come to the us.

[@duanejohnson599]

they also was the first to discover nuclear fission and the first ballistic missiles. if albert Einstein didnt warn usa, germany wouldve created nukes and won ww2

[@Thesaurcery4U2C]

Exactly.. And they forgot to do a timeline on their continuing a Racial Hygiene program and the raising genetic death count. Every time an idea comes up that something would have been better if the USA had done something diffrently? It usually falls apart, or what does better look like? We are barley even the same people as they were back then War times make hard men /// Baby boomers. Peaceful times make soft men /// Erectile Disfunction 😎😎

[@averagejoe112]

They were pointed in the completely wrong direction for a nuclear bomb and even if they knew in 1944 they'd be a decade making the infrastructure

[@jamieoliver9620]

The usa wouldn’t have a scientific edge on Germany

[@simonacerton3478]

Not to the degree this presentation suggest no.

[@averagejoe112]

Yes they would have. German tech was over rated.

[@jamieoliver9620]

@@averagejoe112 i disagree

[@kianfranco2172]

This reminds kinda of Cold War idk why maybe same strategy just different people

[@philbellamy5556]

I would think given this scenario that the US would hop on the expansion train and begin its own conquest of the Americas.

[@schwartd]

Good overall, but disagree on the delayed invasion of the Soviet Union. With the two year delay, the red army would be rebuilt and have defenses along the east west polish border. Stalin had planned to invade Germany eventually when he was ready. A war ready USSR would have won.

[@cbtenthusiast7133]

while you have a point i dont think the red army could have made it to Berlin without the west buffing them and debuffing the Nazis the war would probably grind to a stalemate but where the new border would be is up for debate.

[@randomguy6152]

not invading doesnt mean the border is open many of the soldiers that pushed deep into russia would instead be defending the frontline

[@jadenhiggins7167]

Nah the British and Americans are the 1s who opened up many fronts for the Germans . Taking pressure of the soviets in the east

[@footisman2059]

Dont forget that american neutrality and german victories would push Stalin into increasing the military funding and reorganization efforts.

[@donm5354]

9:55 $15 billion in AID to UKRAINE? Back in APRIL 2022 total was already $54 BILLION - Billions more has been approved while the US Lower and Middle class suffer because of global instability caused by sanctions on RUSSIA. By Bianca Pallaro and Alicia Parlapiano May 20, 2022 The more than $40 billion in additional aid to Ukraine approved by Congress on Thursday brings the total U.S. commitment during the Russian invasion to roughly $54 billion, when combined with the aid package passed in March.

[@c_tsu]

rlly, out of the whole vid thats what got ur attention

[@valkius4777]

@@Emma-dh1lx I hope your children aren't employed unless they're at least 16.

[@shizziebizz]

It will be like wolfenstein story line

[@sara-jb1oc]

Please make a viedo about the Indian Nationalist leader Shubhas Chondra Bose.

[@Mangoonistgamer12344]

I want What if south korea won korean War

[@kashmir3489]

They did. They denied the North Koreans of their objective and reason for actually starting the war

[@alphabeta1337]

Armenian field marshal Bagramyan, Armenian fleet admiral Isakov and Armenian air marshal Khudyakov were senior officers in Soviet Army, Navy and Air Force during WWII Bonus: Tank marshal Babadzhanian

[@thelord2663]

Ok and?

[@disgruntledtoons]

It all depends on who gets the bomb first.

[@L3GIT349]

Alternate video title: If Wolfenstein was realistic.

[@mr.savagetruthfilmstudio6888]

And "the man in the high castle" or "Iron sky"