The dark side of feminism

The dark side of feminism | Tommy J Curry

Рет қаралды 9,581

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 292

@Papadidas 7 ай бұрын

All he’s doing is going over undeniable history there plenty of books and studies on this. By many other authors besides Dr.Curry. He’s just the most popular and is pretty good at his craft to say the least. Just read and you’ll see he’s not making things up.

@seagle111 3 ай бұрын

@@Papadidas weird flex but ok

@CactusJack60 4 ай бұрын

It's sad that for some reason journalists can't talk about this stuff. All journalism seems to spew out nowadays is article after article about how women are oppressed, over and over and over again.

@randalllakeworth3134 3 ай бұрын

CONDITIONING

@amiramaz 2 ай бұрын

Journalists especially in America are race obsessed. They can't stop talking about it, what are you even saying?

@thecollector6746 9 ай бұрын

Shout out to all the YT people in this reply section flailing about, desperately resorting to ad hominem, and his "sentence structure" because they can't actually refute the veracity of his assertions as they are backed up by actual empiricism.

@hjones4922 7 ай бұрын

I'm not sure textual analysis counts as "empiricism"? It's philosophical research and debate, sure, but ultimately it's opinions about other people's opinions.

@Evo4Justice 6 ай бұрын

The basic Tool of a White Supremacist is deception.

@BlackThoughtChannel 5 ай бұрын

@@hjones4922 Opinions about racist opinions?

@hjones4922 5 ай бұрын

@@BlackThoughtChannel sure, but I'm not sure that qualifies as "empiricism"

@thecollector6746 5 ай бұрын

@@hjones4922 ...let's first establish that you don't know what that word "empiricism" means in the first place.

@tfitness4u 3 ай бұрын

@GlennLouryShow I would love to see you share your ideas with Tommy Curry. This isn’t Marc L. Hill or Ibrahim Kandi X or whatever his name is (I am not sure). Tommy J Curry PhD is a very serious man

@AP-pk6mk Ай бұрын

@@tfitness4u those scholars would agree with Curry way more than Glen Loury and John McWhorter though. They recognize white racism against black men in older feminist models because it's from the late 1800s and early 1900s. They would just contend feminism has gotten a lot better since that time. Although ik Dr Curry has cited pretty damning things about feminism going into the 20th and 21st century as well

@frankbeane1071 24 күн бұрын

They can't touch Curry. They're beholded to the myth of American Exceptionalism. They can't contend with any facts and analyses that directly undermines that myth.

@nilsjohnson2636 5 ай бұрын

YT guy here. Brilliant video, giving me all the context that Susan Brownmiller, my old Women's Studies professor, seemed to have conveniently forgotten back when I was in college. Of course, she herself made tone-deaf, if not racist commentary on Emmet Till, earning her the ire of Angela Davis.

@gh0s1wav 5 ай бұрын

For those saying he misquoted Elizabeth Cady Stanton: He didnt misquote her. Generally what she is saying is that men and women need to balance each other out. She is basically saying most men are brutes even tho there are exceptions. This idea that men are GENERALLY brutes is essential for her case to be made. Prof. Curry is pointing to her overarching idea (what she considers to be a rule), not what she considers as exceptions.

@soccergoal4090 9 ай бұрын

Well said Dr Tommy.

@daoud1608 Ай бұрын

This has been seen in the zeitgeist of "Karens" and the slogan of Black woman saving the democratic party and Black men being good for nothings.

@cbbcbb6803 9 ай бұрын

What about other places and times where men seem to care about and love their families?

@blacktastic1 6 ай бұрын

What, PRAY TELL, does what you said have to do with these white women in history practicing white supremacy?

@paulkohler6816 8 ай бұрын

AIA has great content, but their pay walling the rest of it really sucks.

@chrisking1986 3 ай бұрын

Strong agree.

@williamh.gatesiii8183 9 ай бұрын

Thank you for talking about this!!!

@PrestigeWorldwideNAM 9 ай бұрын

Well done.

@ms.madalynmaureenmurphy6582 6 ай бұрын

Excellent.

@Rg-es9kv 9 ай бұрын

important area for discussion!

@__anonymous__4533 2 ай бұрын

Based

@nihilioellipsis 6 ай бұрын

it's odd to me that a man would presents on feminism alone.

@lolivingston6827 6 ай бұрын

Because feminism has become a pathology that harms the lesser class. Stop running from your past

@younghandsome3447 6 ай бұрын

That’s because we’re smarter than yall.

@BlackThoughtChannel 5 ай бұрын

Why?

@marsmith1907 4 ай бұрын

With your pointless statement, we all know why.

@seagle111 3 ай бұрын

It is so slanted and misogynistic views still rule!

@leeFbeatz 9 ай бұрын

✊

@brudamo9203 8 ай бұрын

Capitalism or death. What a small minded concept

@hayleyvaneykeren 9 ай бұрын

2:55 Am I misunderstanding her writing or does this woman implicitly state “I DO NOT WISH to be understood to say that all men are hard, selfish, and brutal?” How the hell are you going to misquote and underline her work like that? edit : 2:53

@Blvck_6 9 ай бұрын

Go read the book. It talks about how white women were active participants in the slave trade (not by standers or victims of “patriarchy that they like to claim). The book also debunks the narrative that white women were at the mercies of their husbands. Throughout the book there are numerous cases of white women requiring prenups and post nuptials before getting married (which their husbands agreed to). It also debunk the myth that only wealthy white people had slaves (middle class women owned 10 or less)

@antiyttrad 9 ай бұрын

He didnt misquote anything, weak

@xc.b3075 9 ай бұрын

😮‍💨

@hayleyvaneykeren 9 ай бұрын

@@Blvck_6im talking about this exact sentence though? if this if such a strong argument there are surely better quotes that dont sound as contradictory edit: by no means am I trying to defend her, its this exact quote that doesn’t seem to line up with this statement

@hayleyvaneykeren 9 ай бұрын

@@antiyttrad how so? read the whole sentence and listen to what he says about it, from my perspective he’s cherry picking

@richardoldfield6714 9 ай бұрын

Yet another example of stupidly trying to judge people (in this case women) of past eras by today's standards. Shall we therefore also similarly judge the many African kingdoms and leaders who were - at that time - complicit in the slave trade?

@antiyttrad 9 ай бұрын

So by this logic you dont judge nazis either right?

@richardoldfield6714 9 ай бұрын

@@antiyttrad The actions of Nazi Germany are rather more recent than those of slave-owners prior to the American Civil War. Moreover, I didn't say 'don't judge' - instead I implied that we should't judge exclusively by applying today's standards .

@tmfuentes7 9 ай бұрын

@@richardoldfield6714 Why do you even jump to that conclusion? Who is "judging exclusively by applying today's standards? Are they with us in this room?

@richardoldfield6714 9 ай бұрын

@@tmfuentes7 When the video calls slave-owning women 'feminists', it's pretty obvious that there's a modern-day anti-feminist agenda in play. The plain fact is that the actions and roles of women who did own slaves were not framed as 'feminists' at the time, and nor are they framed in that way by feminists today. 19th century feminism was about things like getting the right to vote - not about some supposed right to own slaves just like men.

@xc.b3075 9 ай бұрын

@@richardoldfield6714 🤦‍♂️

@jsnadrian 9 ай бұрын

in 100 years, people will look back at Curry's arguments with the same disdain he has for the ideas of 100 years ago. they'll probably be seen as extensions of one another.

@Xcalator35 8 ай бұрын

Could you explain and elaborate on that please? Thanks.

@aclark903 8 ай бұрын

With respect- you don’t know what will happen tomorrow, let alone 100 years from now.

@letssgo1921 8 ай бұрын

Lmao nonsense

@thecollector6746 6 ай бұрын

Flail about harder while gaslighting as you cowardly side-step the fact that you can't refute a word he has asserted nor the empiricism that backs it.

@manbearpig7521 4 ай бұрын

He is pretty dreadful.

@abstractnonsense3253 9 ай бұрын

🙄

@Dzzy123 2 ай бұрын

@@abstractnonsense3253 Why the eye roll?

@Ben9362 9 ай бұрын

I hope the IAI will soon be facilitating a talk on the misogynist side of anti-racism but I shan't be holding my breath.

@letssgo1921 8 ай бұрын

Lmao hilarious

@thecollector6746 8 ай бұрын

Cry harder Pink-Toes as you ironically prove Dr. Curry's point.

@Kitchen374 6 ай бұрын

What's the misogynist side of anti-racism?

@thecollector6746 6 ай бұрын

Tell us, with that big brain of yours....what led you to ask this deep and totally genuine question when there is no gender component to anti-racism to begin with ? Oh wait, there isn't any and there never was.

@thecollector6746 6 ай бұрын

@@Kitchen374 Anti-racism has no gender component to it, and I am not sure if @Ben9362 knows this and is being disingenuous or he is just that pudding brained to think he is dropping mics here.