A Journey into the 4th Dimension - Perspective [Part 1]

[@TheLazyEngineer]

Thanks for watching, hope you enjoyed the introduction to this new series. Right now I have plans for 8 parts! Subscribe to be notified when the next part comes out. Next time we will be actually building and exploring a 4D object.

[@mazenosama8558]

is that blender that you used for the animation ? :D

[@Test-tv9en]

The Lazy Engineer I

[@tristenarctician6910]

What happens when a flatlander see a 4D object?

[@tristenarctician6910]

The Lazy Engineer your the first You Tuber that am gonna be notified

[@MrxstGrssmnstMttckstPhlNelThot]

Why did you only make 2?

[@erickvillegas2544]

3rd dimension dude: I don’t know what you mean 4th dimension dude: wow it’s easy! All you have to do is መψሐፈ ሄφኖክ

[@indiumlove]

sorry 4d creature, i cant move in the 4th dimensional axis known as captcha

[@cycrothelargeplanet]

5D dude: yup!

[@cycrothelargeplanet]

@@indiumlove lmao

[@cycrothelargeplanet]

222 likes!

[@aligamiles]

well all you’d have to do is touch a moving object that is in the fourth dimension

[@joshcalvert3946]

When you realize that 4th dimension beings are having this same conversation about the 5th dimension

[@SansCulotte1917]

when you realize that fifth dimensional beings are having the same conversation bout the 6th dimension

[@Inspirator_AG112]

This reply comes from the 7th dimension. I am obviously joking.

[@olivercastillo4843]

when you realize 7th dimensional beings are having the same conversation bout the 8th dimension

[@Inspirator_AG112]

@@olivercastillo4843 Yes.

[@fishfishery7676]

Lmao

[@inersdraco]

Somewhere in 2D reality: “let’s see how pointlanders can understand our flat reality”

[@user-qh5jk1mn5i]

no they would be lines seeing points

[@vietphamhung3290]

@@user-qh5jk1mn5i shut

[@user-qh5jk1mn5i]

@Viet Pham Hung shut what? a door?

[@vietphamhung3290]

@@user-qh5jk1mn5i ur mom

[@user-qh5jk1mn5i]

@Viet Pham Hung I have two dads

[@fabi8941]

so you tellin me if i accidently do a 4 dimensional movement i will noclip

[@kwes2i]

Precisely

[@aapadd]

actually you log out

[@techleontius9161]

Actually, you would be in another map for cheaters.

[@keenanevans6007]

The sobering reality is... No.. You glitch... Morphing and contorting in all 4 directions: up/down left/right forward/backward and the scary part; inward/outward

[@BumAngel2001]

@@keenanevans6007 The inward and outward ability is what we call materialisation & dematerialisation, correct???

[@jaylarti6984]

there is an alternate 2d universe where this video is about the 3d dimension

[@MitsukiKazen]

and it's seen in a 1D screen.

[@srnova9486]

2D beings cant have computers its just not possible

[@sychomadman]

Sava Roksic they may have some kind of techonology for it to be possible.

[@azestical6566]

Jay Larti computers are 3D they would never be able to create something that’s physically impossible to create

[@azestical6566]

Jay Larti and the part about being flatlanders would be 1D into 2D

[@tahaakif6473]

i just feel bad for those aliens who have to study 4D geometry

[@rixille]

Shouldn't be difficult for them since they are gifted with having the ability to perceive it easily.

[@leofeza9325]

rixille i take it was a joke😂

[@rixille]

@@leofeza9325 lol yea

[@Teaquamarine]

They have a 4d brain dont worry

[@shauntstone8995]

We very much appreciate that, it actually does hurt to a tremendous extent to do such but without doing it well how could anyting progress, and that which does not progress becomes well still, and that would become still becomes ignored, and that which becomes ignored becomes Davy though hey vide o t e h space VI ID 0

[@muhammadjunaid1889]

This is by far the best explanation of 4th dimension space I've ever seen. But still we cannot truly perceive how a 4th dimensional object would look like as this is beyond our reality of existence same as a 2D being cannot visualize the 'z' axis (height) as it's beyond their reality. They cannot conceptualize the idea of moving up and down. It's so amazing how 2D shapes spectacularly changes by just adding 1 more dimension to it. Square = Cube Triangle = Pyramid Circle = Sphere Now just imagine by adding one more dimension to 3D (Brain not working Error 404). We just can't imagine how a 3D object would change to a 4D perspective even if we try to come up with the idea of Tessaract (Hypercube) or whatever it is we are still seeing a projection of it but from 3D perspective. We just cannot visualize how the 4th axis works in motion. It's like explaining an object which is perfectly cube and perfectly sphere at the same time. For us it seems illogical but for a 4D being it may be possible. Correct me if I'm wrong but this is how I understand by not understanding the Great 4th Dimension.

[@chriscogar7485]

Idk Carl Sagan explained pretty easily

[@itssarcasmkids9734]

Idk but imho I think you got the point better than some who are trying to use the fourth dimension to explain ufos or ghosts(whatever cannot be conventional explained really), for all I know or understand maybe the 6th or 11th dimension explains them. I think the greatest quality a person can have is to admit they don't know everything (But it sure is fun to theorize and try to prove and disprove those theories). {No Sarcasm Intended}

[@lordodysseus]

The thing about the Tessaract is it's just a 4D Cube/square/point. But here's the kicker: There are other higher dimensional squares. I've seen theoretical designs on the internet. They go all the way up to the eleventh dimension. And from what I've seen it's just adding more vertices to a Tessaract. It just shows we have no way of knowing what is beyond 3D

[@SumoCumLoudly]

We can 100% perceive it, the brain and eyes are capable. Salvia opens an access point to time and dimension travel, many people have experienced going down to 2d, when I returned from a trip I had full on 4d vision. The best I can describe it is like x-ray vision, you can see the outline of every angle and dimension of an object.

[@hejoce0328]

This all fun to think about, but, It is just all a bunch of imagining. You cannot use flatlanders as an example because they don't exist. I think there are only 3 dimensions and time. There may be another dimension but I think it would have to be in another parallel universe for there are only 3 in this one and time.

[@doneaccount]

Flatlanders: To understand a 3 Dimensional object, we have to understand what's in 1 dimension.

[@Hassoon_117]

Done Account in a 1 dimensional world you are just a single point that moves only back and forth in one directional line and everything you will ever see is just either a dot or nothing

[@nohackers2037]

@@Hassoon_117 1d is a straight line either on x axis or y axis

[@Kalahn54]

@@nohackers2037 An axis doesn't exist in 1D, it's just a line with no perpendicular opposite.

[@unkown215]

we also have to see how 1 sees 2 to learn how 2 sees 3 and to learn how we see 4

[@YouTubeChannel-nf2nw]

@@Hassoon_117 sounds like my life...

[@henrytype1691]

Im a freshman in hs and this whole concept of a fourth dimension is just so damn interesting to me. I love how challenging it is to understand

[@gerardmoran9560]

I slice pizza for a living. My brainy buddy carves watermelons. It's witchcraft!

[@BeastyJay1234]

When you realize ♾️ landers are having this same conversation about ♾️➕1️⃣ dimensions

[@KydroxHD]

You're gonna be huge... I just know it. Don't you dare get discouraged by the current views. This is amazing.

[@Skynet_the_AI]

I TOTALLY AGREE

[@1i1x]

well its been a year but at least these are getting recommended. You can do it if you keep working

[@myfrequencies1912]

@John Smith It's not a question of being "smart enough". This information is becoming far more relevant today than ever before, hence the explosion of interest.

[@johnnastrom9400]

It's not going to be huge because it is a complete rip off of a film Carl Sagan did many years ago.

[@johnnastrom9400]

@@myfrequencies1912-- No. It does not matter how relevant you perceive it to me. The fact is most people who watch you Tube waste their time watching useless shit, like the You Tube equivalent of the Kardsahians. And yes, most people are too dumb to understand scientific concepts and therefore have no interest in videos on the subject.

[@azure3544]

imagine the 4th-dimensional people entering our world, and we are just seeing random shit appearing and disappearing out of nowhere because we can't see the whole thing

[@gaborkrausz5402]

Ahhhh... that's insane

[@MouseGoat]

Basically ghost, and also quantum physics :D

[@jameschristian1664]

Holy shit 4D+ shiz could be ghost stuff

[@soos4719]

That's ghost

[@finndahuman57]

So thats what happened to my pencils in School

[@maiaallman4635]

This is the best explanation of 4D space I have heard. Well done!

[@fookermooker8612]

That circle is a witch. BURN THE WITCH!

[@garywillow6578]

Thanks for putting a smile on my face.

[@Mercyreneeb]

fooker mooker this is the funniest comment ive ever read on any youtube video in the past decade of watching youtube. 😂

[@fixel5578]

Witch goes to ana or kata direction We: OMG REAL WITCH

[@SuperDZ555]

Use four-dimensional fire

[@Goldencontrails]

"Telling a flat lander to move up or down is meaningless. Because they have no concept of up or down" Flat Earther Society: Now wait a minute

[@legendgames128]

Him: You used to have no concept.

[@theusual_noob3684]

but a flat earther knows how to go down, bc their iq isnt going up, but down

[@JohnnyTwoFingers]

What if flat earthers are 3D projections of higher dimensional objects? Wouldn't it be funny if the answer was right in front of us but we couldn't see it? I think that would be hilarious.

[@ericstoverink6579]

Makes me wonder if a few of so-called ghost sightings are actually 3d shadows of 4d beings. That could make for some good sci-fi.

[@smergthedargon8974]

No, they weren't. There's no evidence of a spatial fourth dimension. Good sci-fi, however, yes.

[@switchstatement568]

@@smergthedargon8974 Yeah I agree, but I heard from someone in the comments that the string theory says our space could hold 10 dimensions.

[@smergthedargon8974]

@@switchstatement568 String theory is an as-of-yet untested theory. Additionally, its extra spatial dimensions are "small", as it were - they exist only on subatomic scales, if at all.

[@Elonmusk69790]

That'd be cool

[@timekeeper2538]

@@smergthedargon8974 We've already proven the 4th dimension, there's more evidence for it then there is for the origin of the moon or life on Mars.

[@satyman08]

3D Beings: WOAH It's a floating sphere!! 4D Being: No you idiots it's a cross section of a hypersphere visible to you Edit: I know I sound like a little child but thanks for the 1 *thousand* likes, I guess

[@aceykiwi5877]

Lol

[@squidproquo2241]

@Derek Sloan 1D being _ Whaaa!!! 2D being _ Whaaa!!! 3D being _ Whaaa!!! 4D being _ Where the hell am I?

[@lilbogolo8189]

So there are infinite dementions

[@lavasqrl702]

5D beings: No, stupid beings it's a cross section of a ???sphere!!

[@satyman08]

1D person: That's a line. 2D person: Nope that's a circle 3D person: Nope that's a sphere 4D person: Nope that's a hypersphere 5D person: Y'all retarded. It's a pentasphere

[@luxurious0346]

Me: why can't flat landers imagine a fake next to each other lmao [shows 4D objects] Me: *_?????????????????????_*

[@cracknblast8247]

RELATABLE

[@AbsoluteAbsurd]

xd

[@cassied9327]

Luxurious03 I read “flat landers” as “flanders,” like from the Simpsons. It lead to a funny and fascinating visual I didn’t quite understand 😂😂

[@scetmam1031]

Nani?!

[@jolangache3031]

@@AbsoluteAbsurd ..

[@SomeOne-zm6jg]

My take away from this: Just the same as we must learn and empathize with the flat landers to have the tools to imagine the 4th dimension, empathy is the key to higher consciousness and wisdom, as we tend to get so caught up in our own realities that we disregard those other perspectives needed to truly see more

[@yossarian00]

That's kind of stupid

[@SomeOne-zm6jg]

@@yossarian00 this made me laugh. thanks lol

[@wackyanimations3326]

its a math vid. literally nothing other than that.

[@mumbo4134]

Who the freak are flat landers?

[@fetterkeks2796]

I honestly found it REALLY hard to figure out the shapes of those 3d objects at 7:42 haha. Am I the only one? Also great job on this video, keep it up!

[@HerodotusVon]

fetterkeks same lol, maybe I am just an idiot, but it is quite difficult to recognize it from the perspective of something with only 2d

[@Skynet_the_AI]

I knew the second object was yo yo shaped

[@lobsterfrog]

The second one was tricky for me because I assumed they would be right side up, I thought it would look like an hourglass and it kind of does, just squashed and tilted.

[@lobsterfrog]

I also assumed they would be regular 3D shapes at first

[@KuraIthys]

I didn't find it that bad. The first one confused me, but the other two were reasonably obvious. the third being the most obvious. It's difficult, but not impossible for simple shapes. Really complicated shapes though... That's another matter.

[@Roycey77]

My first exposure to the concept of Flatland came from a Carl Sagan video, in which he used an apple and an ink pad to demonstrate the view a Flatlander would have of the apple passing through its living space. I have seen several other videos since then, and yours, The Lazy Engineer, to me, explains this the most clearly. I wonder about this often. Thank you for this superb illustration.

[@baranxlr]

Great video, best explanation of 4D space I've ever seen! I hope you can show us some 4D objects in part 2

[@David_Lloyd-Jones]

Giggle. Nailed him!

[@ibnourroumi]

Don't hold your breath.

[@brandobrandstatter6741]

The 4th dimension is unimaginable

[@brysonsirus7747]

MYNAMEJEFF! You don’t have to be a stupid shit. We’re not saying it DEFINITELY EXISTS. We know it’s hypothetical. But you can’t confirm it DEFINITELY DOESN’T EXIST either. Btw, it’s impossible to have an infinite amount of stuff in our SINGLE universe.

[@victormkhaliphi2778]

You do not have that capability.

[@soos4719]

Imagine you saw a ghost and it says: "bro move inward I can't see the TV"

[@Sabercon]

me: *literally morphs into myself*

[@adriangalvezpantoja5740]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH

[@cycrothelargeplanet]

But I'm 4D

[@A2Zee_Pocket_Movie_8k7G]

A beautifully done visual- explanation of a seemingly tough concept without the aid of computer and animation. hats off to you sir.

[@pauldavis5665]

If ghosts are real maybe they exist in a 4D universe which is why they can seemingly appear and disappear. Their position on that fourth dimensional axis (which we don't have access to) determines whether we see them or not.

[@dankmheems290]

Maybe you are seeing a brief reflection that disappears. Like seeing someone in a window looking from behind when in the window they are looking right at at you, both at the same time. Jesus the universe is complex.

[@jacecadiz2221]

they are real :) if you have a astral projection you will understand it. in science, it's called quantum realm

[@heavenknight7872]

You think jesus was 4 dimensional? Explains how he reappeared after his death. Idk its a thought

[@jacecadiz2221]

​@@heavenknight7872 maybe bro. but actually the only thing that died was His physical body.. He resurrected after 3 days, because He fought with Death, and He convinced those people who were already in Hell (since there's no religion that time the sinners go directly to hell when they die) to go up with Him to heaven, many came with Him but those who did not accept Him and still mad on Him because they are stuck in that damn hot place for hundred of years already did not repent and rejected Him.. so they are left in hell. So again He resurrected after 3 days after doing that stuffs... when He became alive, He started to show His personality as a God, that can disappear and just appear out of nowhere... then after teaching the Disciples what to do, He finally left them, flying to the sky like a light..

[@lizbotica2965]

@@jacecadiz2221 only, He is not 'a' God, He is GOD.

[@Stray0]

I'm new here. I've seen a lot of videos about 4th dimension. Still can't imagine anything. Gonna subscribe and see how that goes.

[@lilihahattl1582]

play a game call 4d toys, it will help, trust me

[@thudthud5423]

We could only perceive a 4D object as a 3D object upon a "perimeter inspection" unless we make a deduction of its higher dimensionality as it passed through 3D space.

[@svetlanaahnna3103]

How'd it go?

[@yosepupithani5441]

folks let me watch the series. then ill start with the games&videos. thank you anyway

[@yosepupithani5441]

@@thudthud5423 exactly! the way that flat landers could perceive 3D objects.. thank you.

[@Tank-ib2mn]

If a wooden board moves a cross your fingers you can sort of tell which direction it is moving in. If the wooden board moves down you will feel it. If it moves to the left you will also feel the direction. So could a flatlanders tell what is up and down by touching?? 🙂

[@TheLazyEngineer]

Yes. Because friction would apply a force in the z (up / down) direction. So they would feel a force exerted on them in a direction perpendicular to their plane. I imagine it would feel pretty weird!

[@TEXMACHINE3000]

If a wooden board moves across your fingers you would get stitches

[@donovanmahan2901]

it would probably hurt to get pulled in a direction your body isn't meant to handle.

[@peteramarillo8952]

wow. this is the best video on science ive ever seen. amazing. Ive studied physics, theoretical physics, quantum physics, astronomy, etc. but this video sees everything in a new, realistic way. you are a genius!! Keep making more videos!

[@denigechte]

Don't mean to be mean, but If this is the best video you have ever seen on science maybe you should study some more... P.S. Watching videos on KZbin is NOT studying!

[@ivmusic5404]

denigechte Well. Not for you

[@robertkocourek600]

I imagined the Bird Box monster(s) as probably being extra-dimensional in nature. Their shape being so incomprehensible as to drive one insane on sight.

[@spaztic8188]

@pyropulse He is speaking the language of the gods.

[@NM-bd6bs]

I always thought of the Bird Box monsters as infinity (because what we know is limited, and physically seeing no limit would drive you insane), but maybe that extra-dimension is past that limit our minds can comprehend.

[@robertkocourek600]

@@NM-bd6bs Hmm. Interesting. Can a lack of dimension be a dimension (Paraphrased from Data - TNG)? I was thinking along the lines of "Flatland: A Romance of Dimensions.". But we can't cut your idea out. "To peer into the soules depths is to peer within one's self." I can't remember where I heard/read that. Probably some pulp garbage novel when I was a youth.

[@phutureproof]

@@robertkocourek600 When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back. Also an on point reply... the monsters in birdbox could be handle by already loony people, and they looked like bad drawings, which would drive me insane at least :)

[@wyattdylan1]

In bird box, the creatures were intended to be these ugly baby things but then the movie creators took that part out because they thought it was stupid and it gives us more room for our imaginations.

[@Alphahaukdaboss]

I litterally looked up lots of videos that explained 4d cuz i didnt know what it was exactly and i was interested, and your video was the one where i understood everything! Thanks!

[@dertery8724]

This video should be shown in every classroom on Earth! It's beyond amazing and thought-provoking. I don't know why this has not millions of views - much junk has. People need to realise this and be more happy - less stressed. I'm the grand scheme of things, being late for something doesn't matter as time is not fixed but changes with gravity and motion, appearance doesn't matter as it's merely how other infinitely small 3 dimensional humans judge you. People need to enjoy their life and not be fixed by man-made arbitrary constraints!

[@yeahsev7586]

Der Tery it was demonstrated the exact same way by Carl Sagan in the late 70’s

[@arulross70]

But did he make a lit as f video

[@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa]

Probably because the contents of the video are actually nothing new. Videos like these have been floating around for decades.

[@diegoandrade2208]

You know they don’t teach you in school.

[@kojo5928]

Lmao. This video got me scared yo. I’m weirdly convinced some “flatlander” things exist somewhere.

[@SH_187]

Trasher Lee they do

[@turb0j3sus26]

They really do

[@Hassoon_117]

Leslie Akangah They only exist as a substract thought in our minds.. don’t worry they’re not alive

[@harsh_t]

They do

[@hrush437]

LMFAO!!! me too!!! Dude, I'm like wow

[@StrattCaster]

Wow, that's pretty danged cool. I'm definitely watching the whole series!!!

[@ferrisnantucketpoem5061]

09:00 Flat landers can't point to the 3rd dimension, so without a direction to "stack" a bunch of 2d cross sections (up or down), there's NO way they could picture the 3d object... especially with how hard it is to even A) figure out what shape the 2d object is looking only at a flat line (cause again no height all flat-landers see all the time is varying line lengths. So to even picture the 2d shape or cross section of a 3d obejct, flat-landers have to rotate the 2d "plane" 360 degrees. Just like we have to rotate a cube or the objects shown in this video to even picture them as 3d creatures living in a 3d world. And B) picture stacking all those memorized 2d cross sections in an unknown direction

[@wilhelm.reeves]

you're on point, it's just like how we can only visualize an array/matrix upto 3-dimension, but this doesn't inhibit us from the fact that we can initialize such matrices with higher dimensions, it's just that we can't perceive/visualize it considering perceptive limitations

[@MrFlyingKitty]

But they can draw those cross sections on paper to form a 3D image

[@wilhelm.reeves]

only until somehow, they realize there is something more to it. And more importantly, if that "somehow" exist.

[@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa]

@@MrFlyingKitty ...That's a fair point. If it's possible to represent a 3D object in a 2D space (provided you first understand that that is, in fact, what it is), surely it should be possible to represent a 4D object in a 3D space?

[@djtbone001a]

@@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa You can't represent a 3D object in 2D because it's just a degree of varying line lengths. A sphere would look exactly the same as a cube on one point (3D Diamond). It would start as a point, then become a line growing longer and longer and then shrinking until it became a point again. There would be no way to distinguish the two from each other. A 2D creature could not even tell you how far the object is from itself because to it, an object that is closer would look exactly the same as a bigger object further away. The length of the lines it sees would be the same.

[@cyrusjameskhan]

This was very well put together! Amazing work. The first time an explanation has resonated with me, and helped me grasp it to a certain extent. Thank you.

[@leokimvideo]

Carl Sagan did an exquisite explanation of this using real world objects

[@finjay21fj]

Inherent problem, he would have been forced to explain 4D within the limits of 3D

[@Loki-Landsby]

I miss him

[@uselessvirus155]

4D is just like Seeing 360° in one look Then You Look Behind... That's 4D

[@mubeenamir]

panorama

[@swltan770]

no fucking way

[@nemplayer1776]

Not really true, that's just seeing in 2D, but having a wide field of view. If you could see in 3D, you could look at a cube, and see every one of it's sides and what's inside of it at one time.

[@cracknblast8247]

@@nemplayer1776 Exactly

[@squidproquo2241]

@Useless Virus _ In fact 4D image is possible only when we are able to see objects under the effect of their speed and the gravitational field that they are in, together applying these to ourselves. In other words, you have to add how deformed an object in reference to your own deformation (in reference to your speed and gravitational field), when you observed that object. The rest is mathematical abstraction.

[@jojuweekendprojects]

The music you chose for this video is right on the mark, in that it perfectly mirrored the way this video makes me feel. Good job, you just earned a sub.

[@ilogicQ]

Seriously it did! Sure there are lots of other videos on this topic but I got my aha, wow with this one & it was in sync with the music.

[@jp.mdchannel1440]

I have never seen the fourth dimension explained so simply and beautifully. Thank you for posting it.

[@KyLesCaster]

So UFOs are really just 4-5 dimension or higher cross-sections. That explains the way they show up as dots of light in formation that are always locked in grid, but can move together from one location to the other VERY quickly

[@enpeacemusic192]

Oh we have a conspiracy boi here

[@smergthedargon8974]

Ahhh, you schizos are everywhere on semi-obscure science videos. Your nonsense brings me such entertainment!

[@leomdk939]

@@smergthedargon8974 And you egotists who think you have the whole universe figured out are everywhere on these vids, too. I don't agree with his UFO idea either, but you don't have to be a condescending little prick about it.

[@smergthedargon8974]

​@@leomdk939 ​ Call me an egotist all you want. At least I don't assign utterly delusional explanations to unknown phenomenon. I'd loved to be proved wrong here, but I doubt he's right and I have no reason to believe he is.

[@mariafe7050]

@@smergthedargon8974 Yep, you’re definitely condescending.

[@kariescabar4874]

Understanding the 4th dimension is basically looking at yourself. You look in the mirror and you see your physical self, but you also have thoughts(which exist electromagneticly) and you have a electro magnetic field that surrounds your body, produced by your heart so we are 4th dimensional beings. Our body's being a physical shape but only another shape which is within more bigger layers of the same shape which are just energy. BUT IS VERY MUCH THERE JUST AS YOUR BODY IS. and learning to see these energetic aspects of yourself being your "aura" and beginning to identify back with your aura as we're supposed to is entering 4d than 5d than higher dimensions.

[@chrisklinetob7389]

Well done! I've watched many videos which seek to enable us to envision the 4th dimension but this one is more intuitive than most. We cannot "see" a 4th dimention but we can start to imagine what it would like. We just need to be open minded about it. Kudos!

[@kingaragornii9940]

🌟 *Flat-Lander = Flat-Earther.* "If its not flat... It's a witch! Burn it!"

[@dannyrutz3792]

Spot on dude, I like how you go back to the basics by relating and understanding how 2d Flatlanders are living a certain reality and it causes them not to be able to see 3d but once a 3d object passes through the 2d reality they can identify it only so far as shapes not the whole 3d object I really like this video because us as 3d beings will always have a hard time, even mentally (forget about physically this earth is 3rd dimension we will never see something from the 4rth dimension pass through this Earth with our natural sight) but mentally with our minds we can imagine it and understand it heck there are more more than 4 dimensions who knows how many...!!?? that is what you were bringing to the table to first understand how 2dimensions peeps would go about imagining about 3d so that we can do the likewise and from a 3d reality imagine 4d... Really cool stuff and yes there are other videos that point with that same direction that 4d is like "in and out" like it's crazy we would be like transparent or something who knows let ur mind be free and think out of the box with it thats what I'm gonna do! Peace man Daniel Tampa FL

[@brayanxd4547]

Every 3 months I come to watch this work of art. Thank you.

[@juliuspahama4671]

Its so good man. Your explanation is so easy to understand....please keep it up. Im gonna download this and show it to my class for them to understand the concept of dimensions... Thank you so much man, you really made an amazing and less mind-buggling video.

[@scorpio2t]

Inner and outer, I like it. Thoughts are inside and you can go into thought. You can bring out a thought and express it. You can also not pass thru solid objects and atoms don’t mix, even with all that space in between them. Cool video!

[@xuezimings4181]

the most comprehensive 4D content ive watched in yt,, thanks for dumbing it down 😭

[@ThinkTwiceLtu]

Hey, nice video. If you ever need a 3D animation feel free to ask:)

[@liliacfury]

what about a 4d animation 😏

[@skhumbuzocele1330]

Make a 0 Dimension animation please …… ;-))

[@AlchemistOfNirnroot]

@@skhumbuzocele1330 This guy knows whats...

[@swaroov9236]

think twice what do i need to learn to be able to make animated videos,i mean which diploma,

[@hj8607]

put together a actual 2 D for his incorrectly represented one . OOPS, that could be a problem . First you would need to become two dimensional so don't cheat , using your third dimensional existence . ' when in two dimensional do as the two dimensionals , do ' .

[@dr.psycho5606]

Predicting the 3d shape from it's projection on the 2d surface is like an MRI scan, You only see one section at a time, But if you combine all the sections you get an idea about the whole shape, We can apply this to predict how things will look in the 4th dimensions, For example, if a car moves from point A to point B you will see it as a train in the 4th dimension, This is because you're seeing the position of the car in each frame of the time all at once

[@altonmassson]

Dr. Psycho fascinating!

[@darkenergy410]

And lives of humans are also extended out like a |train|

[@fanimeproductionst.v.3735]

Wouldnt every thing just be a blob of color then? Since were seeing the motion of everything, at all places present or past, at the same time?

[@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa]

That's... not how that works. A 2D object moving in 3D space would be just that. An easily identifiable 2D object. Same with a 3D object moving in 4D space. Unless you're talking about a 4D object moving through 3D space, in which case... that still isn't how it works. It'd grow out of nothing, then shrink and vanish. Unless you're ACTUALLY trying to talk about visualizing objects as their shape through time, in which case you wouldn't be able to see fucking anything, because the entire world is taken up with the motion of all objects, including yourself, and would be more of a windy, twisted metal snake tangled up in the rest of the world.

[@fanimeproductionst.v.3735]

@@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa So i was correct?

[@AMan-xz7tx]

I got into this game called 4D miner, and now I'm on a binge for series like this one, loving this so far! (next stop: non-euclidean manifolds!)

[@robertminnie782]

5:20 - Exactly what I thought would happen if I clicked on the video. XD ... Or tried to think in the 4th dimension.

[@pi4313]

It's very difficult to explain the 4th dimension to observers in the 3rd dimension through a 2 dimensional video - so I thought this was a great video

[@asdocneter]

@5:15 : if we looked at a cube from the 4th dimension, we would see all 6 sides all at once. Meaning, we would be able to see the side that is hidden from our plane of view. This simple explanation is the basis of the notion that a black hole is 4D - if you theoretically stood in the event horizon of a black hole, you would be facing the back of your head (due to the physics of black holes and light, but it's that physics that creates the 4th dimension).

[@soullessgemini7786]

This is a really good video. I still do not fully understand dimensions but this is the best example I've ever personally saw. I understand dimensions a little better.

[@kriegpsycho521]

Flat earthers.. go away.

[@Abdega]

In a 4D universe there are “sphere earthers”

[@UFO314159]

They went back to Flatland.

[@jo_nm9484]

And there are thethalpspheres for planets

[@Rangerness]

That's all I could think of when he said that lol

[@williamlevy6964]

In your arrogance you fall from the fourth dimensional understanding Krieg.

[@RaduP3]

Duuuuuude you are so accurate. I am so glad I found this video. I have been mentally exploring dimensions and one day I had an experience where inside my mind I went on a journey that took me into another dimension, where all things stood still and they were, simply. from without, I could (see, be) it and the experience was complete perception of the perceived. from within, there were all the numbers and the lines waiting on shelves, all of them from all the being. it was the moment before they moved . it was such a complete serene loving tomb like sensation that the only physical symbol I have is death and love combined . it was before the first line was drew and what you are describing is what happened from there further in triangles, cubes and all the other dimensions these shapes span over.

[@coffeejohnny2337]

And 4D people have the same dilemmas with 5D world

[@jwscorpio696969]

Wtf?

[@HDitzzDH]

And who says we needs to stop at a certain dimension? The 76th dimensional beings might ponder the same questions of the 77th spatial dimension...

[@Xnoob545]

@@sparrow8095 J82h&JUuahH&*^FsLk;¿♡••

[@KyrusR]

Today I learned that flatearthers are just 2 dimensional beings who somehow manage to exist in 3D space

[@exploding_pineapples]

But for the projections, we have it easy. We can see the entire 2d slice of the 3d object at once by looking at it from above. A more accurate analogue would be if we could only see the line of the 2d slice from inside flatland. We would have to construct the 3d object by rotating around the 2d slice and using shading alone to first figure out what the 2d slice looks like from "above" and then adding those all together.

[@azure3544]

Hard to believe that we are trying to understand the 4th dimension in a 3 dimension computer on a 2 dimension screen with our 1 dimension brain.

[@ZeroBaller0]

Or at least it should

[@usualunusualkid7149]

Our brains are 3 dimentional, idiot

[@usualunusualkid7149]

@Astha Thakur Brains have width, length and height. 0 dimentional means a simple dot.

[@aceykiwi5877]

@@usualunusualkid7149 welcome to the joke

[@shooter5439]

@@usualunusualkid7149 adam şaka yapmış. "aptalız, beynimiz 1 boyutlu diyor"

[@RafaelTopgunStudios]

I’ve seen 4D via 3D and you’re totally right. It looks like it’s forever moving in an indescribable fashion. Kinda looks like fractals. Some people out there may know how this is possible ;)

[@XlWolfMaster]

tell me, guy from two years ago

[@RafaelTopgunStudios]

@@XlWolfMaster Lol. Meditation on a solid dose of psychedelics. You’ll likely see geometrical shapes that should be impossible to observe. Why? Idk. I guess the brain isn’t bound to constructing 3D geometry when you’re in those states isolated from your senses. I have no idea how to give a worthy description of what you can see, but you can see a square from what seems like a 4D perspective. You’ll see all sides of the square, even the inside and outside, from all angles at the same time while noticing its shape/relationship in time, which makes absolutely no sense intuitively at the current moment. Isn’t that called a tesseract/hyper cube or something? All I can say for certain is that it’s absolutely beautiful. Hahaha

[@XlWolfMaster]

@@RafaelTopgunStudios Interesting, I'm guessing the chemicals have a certain impact on the receptors of the brain, making you see this you normally couldn't. Thanks for the info!

[@nilsber.]

​@@RafaelTopgunStudios What psychedelics? A strange mushroom from a witch from the local swamp hut? Did she enchant it with black magic?

[@dreamycrusades]

This Video isnt for commenting in humor . Just one word for the amazing explaination - Astounding.

[@luisestevam4330]

Amazing video! For the flatlander to picture the 3D object, it was need to be introduced the concept of time, tho. As you said, He could not see the whole shape at once. Therefore, for him, the third dimention was his own two dimension moving through time. I know it's only the first video, but time seems important to picture higher dimensions from any given lower dimension. Am I wrong?

[@TheLazyEngineer]

For him the 3rd dimension still isn't time, but his PERCEPTION of it is a CONSEQUENCE of time! Sure, the collection of observations were gathered during an interval of time, but the higher spatial dimension still exists completely independent of time. But like you said, it is useful (maybe even necessary) for visualization purposes in lower dimensional spaces. Really what time equates to in this is the act of collecting data/observations. Thanks for watching!

[@luisestevam4330]

The Lazy Engineer Yeah, it makes sense. Thanks!

[@JohnSmithEx]

For the 3Der to picture the 4D object, it is simple. Imagine a baby face, morphing to a kid face, morphing to a juvenile face, morphing to an adult face, morphing to an elder face, morphing to a naked skull. You have just imagined a single 4D object, by imagining multiple 3D projections of it!

[@ffggddss]

Yes, time is an extra dimension; but no, it isn't (completely) like the spatial dimensions; so it was good that you dismissed using time for that, early in this video. It could be, however, that a lot of your viewers might not grasp exactly why time couldn't be used for that. The answer lies in the way that time joins space to form spacetime; that is, in the role it plays in the spacetime metric. And the mere introduction of the concept of metric, opens a whole new can of worms, requiring a lengthy discussion in order to explain its relevance. What it boils down to, more simply, is how an n-dimensional object can be rotated in n-space. Dimensions that are truly equivalent, can be "mixed" with complete abandon in rotating objects. You can rotate a planar object (n=2) with a single degree of freedom (an angle); a spatial object (n=3) with 3 degrees of freedom; a 4D object (n=4) with 6 degrees of freedom; etc., and its shape remains unchanged. But in 4D spacetime, "rotations" that involve time, do not retain shapes. This is easier to see in 2D spacetime: 1 space + 1 time dimension. Because while the trigonometry in 2D space is purely circular, the trigonometry in 2D spacetime is hyperbolic. + John Smith: So, yes, that's a sort of 4D object; but, no, it isn't a purely spatial 4D object; it can't participate in ordinary rotations. +TheLazyEngineer: And BTW, what you repeatedly call "projections" in this video, aren't projections, but sections. You sometimes use the term, "slice," which is correct also.

[@remixener22]

Finally someone who knows time is not a spatial dimension

[@-ChrisD]

From an eternal perspective, is time not spatial? Time has to do with speed of light and speed of light has to do with distance traveled. If you look into space, you can see things that aren't physically there (in the here and now) , like stars, but were in the past. And you know they were there because you can see them. I'm just wondering a bit. Not trying to disagree. On a grave stone, time is a date to another date (point A to point B) with a line ("2 Dimensional") in the middle. You're whole life gets summed up to a dash in time. I heard a great sermon about that once :)

[@natevanderw]

No, time has been experimentally verified to be a dimension by special relativity over 100 years ago, albeit a time-like dimension in which we only know of going in one particular direction (forward). When you blow up a spherical balloon, and let the air out , each point in time is representing a 3 dimensional cross sectional area of a 4 dimensional sphere.

[@elementsofphysics7324]

@@natevanderw No, time is indeed a dimension, but not a spacelike dimension... It's obviously a timelike dimension... It is hyperbolic, not parabolic. Usual Space-Time signature is (-1,1,1,1) (or the opposite, depending on your convention), not (1,1,1,1) like the 4D space (not space-time) discussed here.

[@natevanderw]

Thanks, corrected my typo. It's been 10 years since I have thought about metrix tensor signatures in Minkowski space

[@elementsofphysics7324]

@@natevanderw I understand mate, time flies and you can't keep track of everything! ;)

[@frjimomi]

The best explanation I've seen. Thanks.

[@brazilianhumanbean559]

My head hurts but i think i'm starting to understand

[@tlhalefangmogatosi3081]

same here!

[@ilogicQ]

@7:43 I actually couldn't make out the objects that were supposed to be moving through flatland. Is that a fault of mine or is it actually a hard thought experiment? Sure it made sense after seeing the final object but the slice wasn't enough for me to make the leap. If its that difficult I can only image how difficult for a flatlander to even conceptualize reconstructing the slices in their minds.

[@kelving420]

It was hard because he tricked us, he used objects an object we don't ever see (the "rotating" square) and another object, but in an angle that made us think it was a normal polygon.

[@kiiturii]

i got pretty close but had an "oooh" moment when i saw the actual one, and the other shapes after first one were easier cuz you kinda realised better how it worked

[@estherdoyle7561]

Our brains are able to put the 3d shape together but only because we have previous experience with it. And like you said if for you it was difficult then for flatlanders it would be completely impossible to understand or put together because they have no previous experience and so it does not exist in their world and therefore cannot even exist in their mind. Same reason we may one day find traces of 4D but never will our brains be able to understand it and put the picture together.

[@argonicapple]

it doesnt say anything about you and it doesnt mean you're dumb or smart, its just that some people figure it out and others dont

[@galihcd]

This one video is making the most sense than many other 4d video explanation out there. Thumbs up subscribe

[@fabiansandin1052]

What If we “carried” the 2D Creatures upwards, how would they react? Then they would travel as us 3D people. Could a 4th dimension creature take us to a 4th dimension direction?

[@bobbywatson1070]

But in reality 4th and 3rd dimension are the same. All it is, is growing and shrinking at a perfect ratio at all times

[@JcoleMc]

If you did that they'd die since there would be a extra axis where the slin of there body isnt coverinh and affected by 3 dimensional physics this will cuase there organs to fall out of there body same for if your a 3d person in 4d.

[@Sw33tG4mer]

Probably, but that would be dangerous. In four dimensions, atoms will have more space for movement, so you would be shattered to dust. Just a video I have watched from riddle.

[@JcoleMc]

@@Sw33tG4mer Your blood and bodly fluids will be the first to fall out.

[@Hecatonicosachoron54]

They would see an infinitely small sliver of what we see in 3d

[@artfluegge]

What if a 4D object was something that has to be viewed by 2 or more observers?

[@altonmassson]

Art Fluegge interesting

[@ivmusic5404]

Art Fluegge You mean it requires 4 or more eyes

[@dragonknight1297]

hence, 4D :)

[@MDMAx]

Interesting that we assume a perception of time to exist for otherDimensional alleged beings.

[@MultiSciGeek]

Why? That's not necessary

[@rockinroland0]

I've watched many 4D videos and this is probably the best one.

[@af9404]

Imagine people live in 4d - how the they call the fourth dimension? "Oh yeah! left/right - front/back - up/down and of course %w

[@clivepalayan5895]

This feels like the Mangakyu sharingan inside the 4-Dimension...like how obito used it..

[@Buttergirla]

This is one of the best vids that explains this. I love it

[@elib9678]

Thank You! I can finally fully comprehend the fourth dimension.

[@annacondasnakes]

It is very likely for TIME to be considered a dimension. Because all our 3-dimensional world passes through the vector of time as well. In my opinion, time is indeed a dimension, but is it the 4th? The thing is that Time is a dimension that can be perceived even by the 'flatlander' too. Even by a 'linelander', if we think about the concept of a single dimension being whose perceived world is only a line, instead of a plane. Therefore if time could be considered as a 1st universal dimension. And there may be more, but obviously, we are unable to even imagine the concept of what they could be. We live in a 3D world, and we are created to perceive the 3D world. We are absolutely limited to it, the same way as a flatlander is limited to his 2d World. A flatlander obviously can't perceive the 3d World, he couldn't imagine the concept of it, because he is not constructed for that. he is limited to only see his 'lines' surrounding him, which for us are 2d shapes. Imagine a flatlander being aware of us, 3D beings, which at a single sight we can perceive everything about them, their whole world as it truly is...This fact is impossible and unreal for him, but for us is extremely simple to view it, understand it and manipulate it. For a 2D being, which here is called a 'flatlander', a 3D being would be considered a God. Omnipresent, all-powerful. and impossible to understand. Now... What is the 4th dimension? It is impossible for us to perceive that plane of existence. we are not constructed for that, we have no senses and no 'components' for it. For us, the universe is an infinite 3d world, and that is all we can perceive. What is beyond that? If there is a 4th dimension, it is definitely all around us, but we just can't perceive. And if there is the 4th dimension, there also must be a 4th dimension being, which we can't see, perceive or understand. And just the same way that we can see and manipulate the whole flatlander's world.. this 4D being can easily understand, see, and manipulate our entire 3D world way beyond our imagination, and for us, it would be omnipresent and all-powerful. Does that ring a bell? Now, if it does ring a bell to you about who this 4D being is, according to a certain famous book, we may also imagine that he is also able to manipulate time, not just our 3d space. So can we consider him as a 4D being, or a 5D being if we take the time-manipulating ability into consideration? Tell me your opinion about all this. I just described to you my own perception of the concept of God.

[@marjanp4784]

WOW!!!! This is the best video I've seen so far that explained the 4 dimensions theory so easily, specially for a person like myself who couldn't even imagine how it even worked ... you're so great 👍 Well done 👏👏👏

[@anotherjuan]

are flatearthers actually flatlanders from 2D space with 1 dimensional brains 🙀🌐🤣

[@legendgames128]

they have two-dimensional brains, that is why they say our earth is flat.

[@b.p.rwebber8098]

Incredible to think there are ppl that think the earth is flat dont they have t.v or maybe even electricity . What do they do for education. Is there flatlander schools where these ppl go to learn about all things flat . Man the show 1 a rubix cube and all hell would break loose a cube made up of many small coloured cubes that can be moved without leaving the mother cube, would be like 3d man from the 3rd demention, Runaway before he put us in that strange coloured object thats not of our world run for your lives.

[@joegrizzly999]

Well we technically live in 4 dimensions because you include time cause time is a place too.

[@sosopwsi829Jjw9]

@@joegrizzly999 How is time the 4th spatial dimension?

[@alexradice8163]

@gasbroYT because it's not true

[@shannab1564]

Oh boy, I’m on this part of KZbin again... But nice video my dude 😁

[@ard4296]

Black hole is a portal to the 4th dimension. If you think about it he said you would have to go in and out and that's what black holes do pull you inwards and a white hole makes sense but we have never seen one we just assume that's what it does. And once something goes in it doesn't come back to our 3d dimension

[@billanderson204]

It seems to me the reason we cannot "visualize" higher dimensions is due to the spherical nature of our eyeballs and how photons reflect. We literally haven't "seen" it. I would guess it's physically impossible for the flatlanders to have spherical eyeballs because they cannot imagine a 3rd dimension. I wonder what "visualizations" might exist if our eyes had a different geometry. like if they were more shaped like a salad bowl. Or perhaps a hypersphere, etc. How would photons reflect then? How would that be interpreted by our brain? Could we imagine/experience and/or physically be in higher dimensions? Or even a half dimension if our eyes had negative curvature? In flatland (Euclid land): the sum of a triangle's angles == 180 degrees. constant curvature. like the surface of a cylinder or a sheet of paper. On the surface of a sphere, the sum of a triangle's angles > 180 degrees, positive curvature. And a triangle drawn on the inside of a bowl, the sum of its angles < 180 degrees, negative curvature. I'd love to see a video where the orthogonality of the dimensions are explored. (aka what constitutes perpendicular/independence of the x,y,z [and more] dimensions).

[@ivmusic5404]

I kinda agree with you

[@kellel5610]

The only reason you cant see a fourth dimension is not because of your eye but because of your imagination. You cant think of a direction thats not xyz. flat landers cant have spherical eyeballs because spheres dont exist in flatland, but they can have circular eyes. Who taught you about negative curvature, the inside of a bowl has POSITIVE curvature not negative. If you draw a straight lined triangle in a bowl the angles will add up to MORE than 180 degres not less. If you want to see a surface with negative curvature then search up, hyperbolic crochet which shows you actual negative curvature.

[@awfuldynne]

Monkeys only need to deal with three spacial dimensions, so evolution did not prepare us to deal with more. Since for so many purposes the up/down axis can be ignored, many people have trouble making full use of 3D reasoning. A problem I see with most work-arounds for visualizing 4D is them separating the "extra" w axis from the "regular" xyz axes; it makes rotation a strange and mysterious transformation instead of just one of the ways you can move a shape. Using perspective for the z-axis and depth for the w-axis on a 3D display almost works, but a 4D being would have a retina with three spacial dimensions, and so be capable of seeing a _complete_ 3D shape, like we can see a complete 2D shape, which means a) unless we can conceptualize certain deformations as a volume being _tilted,_ (like how a square at various angles can look like a trapezoid, rectangle or rhombus) we're not going to be able to develop any intuition about 4D space and b) just like the flatlander's perspective renders everything they can see as lines that barely register in a spaceworlder's field of vision, viewing a 3D object from within the volume the object exists in restricts the 4D being's line-of-sight to the near surface of the object, which takes up about as much space in their field of vision as a thread of spider's silk takes in ours.

[@jaesangjasonbaek7775]

When you realize that a line that is visible is not 2D for us

[@Davidpostingshid]

1st dimensional beings: What’s up? 3rd dimensional beings: just chilling. 1st dimensional beings: No like what the hell is up?

[@DBHMedia]

Flat landers wouldn't see anything because theres no height to differentiate between one object from another.

[@michaelkalt5452]

DBHMedia this hurts my brain

[@mariafe7050]

Then by that logic we can’t see anything because there’s no 4th dimension to differentiate between one object from another.

[@aniima5335]

i’ve had the thought for a while about DMT bringing us closer to perceiving the 4th dimension. i think this video does a solid job of explaining it and it feels good having insight into a bit of what’s going on. the infinite cathedrals of fractals seem impossible yet so intuitive. either it’s straight synesthesia or dimensional travel, both are here to be explored and learned from. 🙏🏼

[@galahadthe1st518]

1-Dimensional beings perceive everything as a dot, 2-D perceives everything as a line (1-D), 3-D perceives everything as a plane (2-D), 4-D perceive everything as a solid object (3-D) so, we are actually in the 4th dimension.

[@galahadthe1st518]

Or if not... We are in a 3-D world and we perceive everything as a 2D, for instance, we can only see everything even a 3d cube in our line of sight as a flat plane since we cannot be able to see what is behind it unless we transfer to a spot that we might be able to see it, however a 4th Dimensional being sees every side of the 3d cube without the need to change its place

[@LumpyyyPotato]

Anyone else super baked? Watching this high is amazing.

[@jasondeng7677]

Me: woah, thats a weird random cube levitating! 4D being trying to communicate: * INIVISIBLE ANGER * but on a nore serious note... think. if the 4th dimension is time, then we can all be said to be one 4 dimensional form. to a four dimensional being, we are just an object. we can't move, or ever do anything. they can look at us, see every frame of time we "exist" in they see all those frames of us in 3D at the same time we are just as inanimate as a rock to them.

[@MouseGoat]

well Einstein says no, as time is just a part of space. ^^

[@9PlatinumGamer9]

No. We're moving through time; we just can't choose how or where to move.

[@1dan1609]

Nekogami-Crystal they can basically see all our states since birth till death if we are moving along a definite axis of time.

[@jasondeng7677]

@@9PlatinumGamer9 really, all the time frames exist at once and can be seen simultaneously to a 4d being, like we can see all the frames of an animation, though things in the animation move frame by frame, like us, each universe is a single infinitely insignificant frame. Strange...

[@EEGAR]

This is the best explanation I’ve seen and you’ve done a good job anticipating part 2

[@caleborg5688]

If mario can transition between living in a 2d space and a 3d space, then so can I with 4 dimensions

[@lordodysseus]

Mario was aided by 3-dimensional beings. He also exists in a simulation. Something that might be true here. But even if we are aided by 4D beings. There is likely no way we would ever know. It would just be a patch in the program. Or a sequel. In which case, 4D will have always been a thing and we'd be none the wiser.

[@caleborg5688]

@@lordodysseus there is no in-game proof of 3-d beings assisting mario into the 3rd dimension, so your entire conjecture is invalidated

[@GlacialSkyfarer]

Yeah just find a pipe

[@ck8748]

2D has no mass ass 3D has, and 3D has no "something" ass 4D has... - the never-ending question...

[@doriyanpetkov8510]

Really mysterious. 🙂🦊

[@Malandrin408]

Beautifully done.

[@CraigfugginLand]

I love trying to wrap my head around 4D. One thing I always get caught up on though when thinking about a 4th dimensional being, wouldn't 2 dimensional beings exist as well? What would they be?

[@JR1481M1]

So basically in the 4th dimension, an person can see through things.

[@brysonsirus7747]

Well, when you look at a square, do you see THROUGH it?

[@brysonsirus7747]

Basically, they would be able to see all the sides of a cube without seeing through it or unfolding it. Of course, for us it’s unimaginable.

[@valeriecunningham2617]

You'd be able to see the insides of people. Now, that's cool.

[@0ptimal]

Im not sure see is the right term when trying to imagine what it's like. Think of a consciousness that can 'fathom' all things. Or imagine a thought, say the thought of cold, when u think of cold you just know what it is. You may have images that accompany the thought of cold, but ignoring those images your mind simply understands what cold is, in many different ways. Maybe that's what it's like to 'see' in 4d.

[@francodl79]

Not only they could see all the faces of a cube at once, they would also be able to see everything inside that cube the same way that we can see the totality of a square, not only its 4 sides.

[@shimashr1908]

That was an utterly beautiful and complete video, thank u for sharing

[@Apranik882]

You can see the 4th dimension with the help of something called DMT :)))

[@secretov1da]

4th,5th,6th,7th..........that's why we are looking at the video

[@garywillow6578]

I use magic mushrooms to trip and trancend all dimensions and time. Our only limitation is our own mind and other people's opinions.

[@spacesciencelab]

Yep. A lot of people must open their minds when it comes to psychedelics because they are so profound at what they do to consciousness. There have been many discoveries and inventions, even Richard Feynman used LSD and weed to help him alter his state of consciousness and to understand the quantum realm better. DMT is an entirely different thing though, and quite mysterious because how could a molecule cause such lucid experiences. It is almost as if these DMT molecules do not alter your mind but instead tune the conscious antennae. In other words, maybe the brain can be tuned to see reality in different ways as we only see a very small spectrum of light. There's radio waves and wifi waves and cosmic particles shooting through our bodies and we can't even see them. It would be similar of tuning a radio, one little slip of the knob and you've tuned into a completely different signal; maybe consciousness is the same and can be tuned into all different kinds of signals/realities, that are floating around us everywhere, in 4 dimensions, 5, ,6 ,7, 8, 9, 10 11.... by taking these interesting psychedelics. OK. An update on this. I've been watching Robert Lanza who invented a very fascinating theory called biocentrism which basically states that the universe is created in our minds than the other way around. And that being said, that theory could explain why psychedelics could create such lucid realms. It is not that psychedelics are a gateway to another realm, the other realm is created inside your mind. Now that doesn't make it any less real as Lanza said that for example someone who is schizophrenic sees someone there but it is entirely real for that person. Lanza also states that time and space aren't actually out there but also tools of which our minds use to make sense of things.

[@garywillow6578]

@@spacesciencelab wow you is looking in from the outside man. Thanks for sharing. I usually get laughed at by friends and family for my ideas and beliefs.

[@Somewhere50]

What is DMT?

[@vlonevaro6945]

Could lightning be a 4th deminsional object passing thru earth.

[@shoggler5715]

Lightning doesnt pass through earth though?

[@devesh1baisoya]

Not lighting but light in general can also be the possibility

[@pirandello6968]

Best explanation I've seen on this matter. Thank you!!

[@FishyDaGamer]

If flat landers don’t understand the concept of 3D tell them to imagine a 1d person. That person can move in a straight line but only a straight line and probably just sees a circle or a void going forward and backward. He can’t move and if something moves through it he will see something suddenly appear in a flash and then disappear moments later. Same concept right? But what if we go to the zero dimension. A zero dimensioner sees one thing for eternity, if something moved through him he see something appear and he will likely get pushed or obliterated (the flat lander or line lander goes through him, he cannot move so he dies?). Now we can only understand a slight concept of 5th dimensions and all the higher ones ... but what about negative ones? Things cannot exist or something but it’s still their itself, beyond the void. Idk maybe think of that one scp who this guy is all alone with only a control panel with a red light, he is slowly getting ripped apart because the reality isn’t real enough and he can’t escape, and once he can it’s too late and he’s just a couple organs and like a limb. The reality isn’t “real” but he still exist but not safely. So maybe similar concept for -numbers but each number lower is more unstable?

[@shauntstone8995]

And another one is enlightened! We have two so far come on the rest of you need to kick it into gear