Disturbing the Meaning of Objects | Artist Jessica Stockholder | Louisiana Channel

[@escapefromtheconfederacyof8223]

One of the most articulate, interesting artists you’ve had on your channel.

[@kajsafalck8117]

I love her way of working and thinking!

[@learnrelearn]

Thank you! Jessica’s work and thought process are amazing. My thinking has changed. WOW!

[@fabianthaesler1317]

Simply: Great portrait - about impressive stuff of a great artist. To speak in such a fundamental way, it needs many 'roads' to walk down. Applause to Jessica Stockholder!

[@CIENCIASNARINA]

wonderful video and what a fantastic way to look at the world and our stuff!!

[@revrevreviews]

What a wonderful video. I particularly liked the "Where is the colour?" bit. Fascinating.

[@leesvision]

Very Interesting. I like to hear artists explain their work when they are open to it. Humans really are Interesting creatures, every one is different but also share so many things that are the same.

[@Ethannesss]

incredibly spoken women. Amazing capture here, thank you for sharing!!!

[@shenanigans3710]

Great interview. Love her work and her explanation

[@creativelabspace]

Love this stuff!

[@russellfishes]

She explains her work like an English professor.

[@crystalclear6660]

She expresses herself verbally like an artist would. But I do not see this reflected in 95% of her work. Her art looks like someone trying to BE artistic without the end result. But also on the other hand, art is not supposed to be able to reach everyone. Be understood by everyone. Her art just wasn’t for me.

[@volksbahn]

Well stated.

[@MartinBaldock]

A classic case of "art bollox" as far as I can tell. If an "artist" talks a lot of nonsense, it can fool some of the people some of the time, particularly gallery owners and curators, and their rich clients into thinking the "art" must be from some kind of genius,. In truth, it is coming from a person who has lots of words and a big ego, but lacking in artistic taste and talent in my opinion....

[@helpfulcommenter]

Aaaaand you changed the title format again. You were doing so well. Why can't you just stay consistent? When you put the tagline first, and bury the artist name, and don't have the artist name in the thumbnail, it's like.... are you even paying attention? Is someone being paid for doing this job? WTF

[@mamumonkan]

would you please do an interview on Jens Haaning

[@nathalieleperron9809]

Un petit sous titre français... Please

[@martybrooks6453]

I’m so tired of these junk installations, except for the few leaders in the genre I can’t imagine anyone will care about them 100 years from now and they’ll be relegated to the trash heap.

[@lobstermash]

The trash heap will come a lot sooner than 100 years. I can't help feeling that this kind of work is all about the talking. The actual stuff communicates nothing.

[@MartinBaldock]

I'm not convinced by the work or by Jessicas train of thought, all very confusing and ugly artworks

[@lobstermash]

She's trying to express how rare and baffling raw materials are because they're hardly available. What kind of life has she led? Never been to a beach? She discounts plants as raw material because they're usually brown for some special purpose. What about roadside weeds? This is nonsense.

[@Godfree1212]

Very heady and not very visually compelling. She sure can talk a good game. Typical of so much conceptual art. History will not be kind.