Theology of The Sabbath

[@Lilly2Gbtg]

🤯🫨 that was beautiful and compelling. Thank you!

[@pamphilus3652]

Thanks for the content man

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

Thanks for watching ☺️

[@kylewhitten3961]

4:38 - yes, exactly. I was thinking the same thing as you were reading.

[@eew8060]

Hey! Sorry to bug you, but did you do an episode on Deuteronomy 32:9 'sons of Israel' as a correct rendering? I remember coming across something somewhere, where 'sons of Israel' actually agrees with the concept of 'sons of God'. I just can't pinpoint it..

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

No, but I'll probably hit on it if I continue with the response videos. But you might be thinking of a targum or a dissertation by Jonathan Parker. He writes on p.98: "Ultimately, we can see three versions of the legend. (1) PRE [Pirqe Rabbi Eliezer] presumes “seventy angels” and supports this based on the first person plural address in Gen 11:7; viz. “let us go down” results in the seventy nations because Deut 32:8 tells us that God set their boundaries according to lots (חבל) cast. (The Table of Nations in MT Genesis 10 is implied but not stated.) (2) Ramban and Tg. Ps.-J. develop this alongside the Hebrew text and add a numeric correlation between the divine council, the Table of Nations, and Jacob/Israel’s descendants, which implies a divine predetermination of the number of the divine council according to Jacob’s descendants. (3) LXX and Qumran forego an association with Jacob’s descendants and more directly affirm the source of the number of the nations as the result of a prior reality in the number of angelic counselors."

[@eew8060]

@EulersIdentityCrisis Thanks for that response. Maybe that's the source material but I could've sworn I heard someone talk about it. But if it's not you, I don't know who. Do you know the name of the dissertation? Is it "Moses and the 70 elders"? (That's what comes up on Google scholar search..)

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

@eew8060 I believe so. It might have been Rob from sentinel apologetics. I’ve seen him bring it up before.

[@eew8060]

@@EulersIdentityCrisis Brooo! I think that's it. It was Rob You're awesome!