Рет қаралды 5,583
/ bdccarpenter
/ bencarpenterpersonaltr...
/ bdccarpenter
There are no "bad" foods.
Describing foods as "good" and "bad" is intellectually lazy. It breaks everything you eat into two categories and doesn't factor in how much of something you are consuming.
Something being "bad" for you in excess doesn't mean it is bad for you in any quantity and certainly doesn't mean you need to feel guilty for eating it, something the fitness industry perpetuates.
In this video, we discuss why "good" and "bad" food labels can possibly make diets harder to stick to as well as exacerbating eating disorders. We will discuss dichotomous thinking, dietary restraint and rigid and flexible dieting.
References:
- Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat
- Co-consumption of Vegetables and Fruit, Whole Grains, and Fiber Reduces the Cancer Risk of Red and Processed Meat in a Large Prospective Cohort of Adults from Alberta’s Tomorrow Project
- Restrained and unrestrained eating
- Development and validation of the Dichotomous Thinking Inventor
- Rigid vs. flexible dieting: association with eating disorder symptoms in nonobese women
- Flexible vs. Rigid dieting strategies: relationship with adverse behavioral outcomes
- Cognitive and weight-related correlates of flexible and rigid restrained eating behaviour
- How does thinking in Black and White terms relate to eating behavior and weight regain?