CLYDE’S (BEST ROULETTE) SYSTEM WINS BIG MONEY!

[@trinideryck]

Am I the only one that always fast forward 15 minutes? 😂

[@timdzierzanowski2678]

No your not. lol

[@jaemsmiller3981]

We all do 😂

[@tonymediati8274]

Guilty as charged 😂

[@jerrygerard5458]

Dittoness

[@JoeKind1958]

No

[@mitcher420]

Use the first system but add the columns as well. Get the job done twice as fast.

[@JamesMichael333]

So you mean if he bets the 1st and 2nd dozen, also bet $10 on the 1st and 2nd column?

[@johnbriggs5250]

Good idea.

[@Westcoastjazzer]

I for one really appreciate the time you spend and dedication to educate some of us about this game. I'm looking forward to trying some of these systems in a couple weeks at Pepper Mill Reno. It's been thirty years since I've played Roulette! Thank's!

[@ytwatcher01]

I tested the first system for 100 spins. I was down $260 at 11 spins and up $890 on the last spin. The most I had to bet was $200 once and $180 4 times.

[@gregs3248]

Hello RM I like the first system the best because of the simplicity and suitability for low rollers like myself. Had much success with it and PLP system. Thank you for all your hard work putting out these videos. Helps a lot of people I’m sure.

[@shanestacy6744]

The second one is definitely to Big of a risk unless you have really deep pockets but if you get a perfect roll you can make a couple of hundred bucks but I don't have the nerve to bet that much.

[@sonnyzaro7664]

A lot of numbers covered, so payout is small. $35 to win $7 is 20% of your wager, not fond of that. Recovery has nice payouts. Not a game for hit & run, this is by design is for those who want to spend time in a casino. 3 times your bet on recovery to risky, doubling would be fine, you'll still have bankroll after 3 consecutive losses.

[@CapFlipGaming]

Great point! I love this channel, but he says every system is the BEST system. If they are all the best, then none of them are. It's very misleading.

[@termn8er123]

Look at it for what it is. He's promoting his channel so we all get that. However he offers so many methods you are bound to find one to like.

[@JIM6167]

Betting $35 to sometimes win $1 or $7? Double 3 times for a $280 bet to recover $35? Not for me! This system is guaranteed to Kill your bankroll!!!

[@ivancane8535]

First system buy in 1000 start bet 5 ? Thanks

[@aroonspace]

Good one and reliable

[@masnaringquest4626]

I enjoy Martingaling 1x after first loss, 2x after second, and 3x on the third. 💰

[@TheRouletteMaster]

Thank you for sharing. Love your feedback.

[@mauricerichards8782]

Yesterday's system is Golden

[@andreasapelqvist9247]

Good new system :) Triple Maringale is dangerous, but it worked out this time

[@Dave_Verbeek]

This is not tripple martingale because thats your bet times 3 This is your bet times 8 so it is a octuple martingale hahaha

[@johnblyth9787]

That is what i came here to say. 3 whacks and chassing 2K on 1 and $7 wins. Ouch ​@Dave_Verbeek

[@andreasapelqvist9247]

Yeah true, my mad. 8 times Martingale, crazy

[@hobie1115]

There are 6 total whacks and you double three times after a loss?? That essentially means after 2 losses in a row or three losses in a short sequence and you're done. Too risky.

[@legojenn]

This seems like it would be better as part of a mix it up strategy with varying risks and rewards. The payout is way to small to dig out from a loss. Playing the same numbers over and over is boring as well.

[@roberttassone7676]

I can see a string of green now! Lol

[@marty103711]

I think if you only double once after a loss of $35. All you have to do is hit 3 of the $14 wins to be in profit. Doubling 3 times is over kill. Same thing if you loose a second time before you recover on the first double. If you loose on the $70 roll from the first double. And you double a second time. All you need is 3 wins on the $28 numbers 3 times to fully recover. Etc etc. Thay being said, i would propably limit my doubling to the $280 dollar double and try and work my way back to profit and then reset.

[@Alois.V]

good day TRM, what is the system that you can recommend? I am your subscriber, thank you if you can suggest

[@ogialem]

You changed my life in this year thank❤❤❤❤❤

[@mikekoenning]

Exponential martingale doesn’t seem right (2x+4x+8x). Bank roll isn’t big enough. Do you think he meant to double the bet and hit 3X before going back to the original instead? Or maybe betting 2x 3 times (6x)… or even just 3X? Can we get confirmation from whoever sent it in?

[@robert-2819]

A much easier 24# coverage is pick 2 doz $10 on each, ignore losses incerase 1 unit after wil, reset after three wins. Walk at plus $200

[@itzamia]

If you ignore losses, you're going to have a difficult time coming back from it. If I ignore 5 loses in a row and then increase after a win or 2, I'm still going to be trying to pull myself out of a hole.

[@Justin_Sanders1234]

I liked the 1st system wayyyy better

[@iamric23]

does anyone know how to submit a strategy?

[@ductorman]

I played this at my base casino yesterday. If you walk up to monitor and don't see any bogey numbers out of the 20 last spun ..........run. The second and third numbers were bogeys and then the sixth one as well. I went and played some slots after that. I won my goal x3 so I left with profit for the visit. Luckily I only doubled one time for the first loss and once for the second one, kinda like testing the water temperature before jumping in. Don't forget, a system like this really boosts your comps so you can enjoy a free meal while you wait for the black vapors to clear.

[@dennisdmenace6249]

"Bogey numbers"...???

[@TheRouletteMaster]

Thank you for sharing

[@JamesMichael333]

I like the 1st system but if you get 3 or 4 losses in a row it can be impossible to climb back down again unless you go on a lucky run. If u have the bankroll i think its better to keep doubling until a win and then reset On 2nd system, ya if you lose the $280 bet,just double twice to $1120…i guess

[@benvanzanten379]

Any method that requires you to double is useless. Doubling up is no guarantee of profit. On the contrary; you're just putting yourself more in the danger zone. A flat bet or Fibonnaci (up to a certain limit) is much better.

[@mdatre1]

I have tested a lot of these systems extensively prior to going to the casino. Some do extrememly well on automated RNG wheels online but Ive more times than not been busted on live wheels at the casino. In some cases never been up. Roulette is a pure game of chance as you all know, but when going to the casino, if you believe that trip after trip you will beat the casino, you're fooling yourself. It's wise to have stop loss levels as wwell as cash out levels. Best you can hope for in the long run is to break even. Great fun though!

[@mandamus777]

Add $1 to the 2/0/00 and give up the $1 wins then you only have 2 losers or $1 on 35/36 and absorb the $1 losses. That 3 times is a killer. All it takes 0s twice and your toast

[@rutheraquino6378]

I really like Lenny’s system

[@Dirty_Harry85]

I like the first one. I don’t see your total bank roll. I don’t see how you bet 1700 and ended up with 856 profit. 🤔

[@marlonbrowne3391]

Can you try my system. Start betting after a sequence of 4 numbers coming in the first 12 with bets on the 2nd and third 12 plus bets on 2 horizontal rows Keep moving away from the win rows so 4 ×£ 10 each spin

[@ShawnDixon-r4z]

Problem with these is there’s not enough time to get the bet down online. Looks like a good system

[@kostaspap4699]

Bust 3 1 k accounts with this approach stay away never double especially triple i started with 0.1 bets after some loses i was out

[@eschaasberg]

Funny system but.... Just bet on 5 double streets leaving the 1-2-3 and 34-35-36 open with $5 each, $25 total. Each win is a $5 win. When you lose double twice to $100 and with 1 win you are only €5 behind and can start over again with the $25 bet.

[@jaemsmiller3981]

I totally agree. I was just thinking the same thing when he was playing the system

[@philiphebbard]

Like it, but I'd change leaving 1-2-3 to 4-5-6. Might not be possible on live table unless betting $10 on the Double St. and 5$ on Single 1-2-3 and 7-8-9 Reason? 1 and 2 are close to the green. (American wheel) The $2.50 should work on some video terminals.

[@danielmathias3237]

Hey RM, don't you think 8x your bet on a loss is too risky?? I mean a back to back loss and you're clenching already. I would prefer 4x your bet on a loss that would mean: 1st bet: 35 2nd bet: 140 3rd bet: 560 4th bet: All in You're then looking at 2 good wins in a row to get back, good chance to get 2 good back to back wins with 4 chances.

[@RelaxedEZ223]

I think if you doubled twice instead of three times, the bankroll would allow 3 bets.

[@onlinedealhacker2069]

How different is the simulator from an online casino roulette? The simulator always seems (to me) to be much looser.

[@promotionaltoaster]

I tried the first system with $450 which gave me 15 straight possible losses. I immediately started trending negative, went down from 450 bank to about 180 bank. And spent an hour struggling to get back to starting bank, but never getting up past 420 bank during that hour. Trash.

[@garrybriggs2049]

Hi love the videos, thank you for taking the time to show and explain these systems. Can I ask where you got the simulator software as I would like to get one for my new laptop. Many thanks

[@TheRouletteMaster]

I use Roulette Royale on Apple or android

[@josephtousignant7318]

I think Clyde's system risks WAY to much on the triple doublings! Why lose $35 and next bet risk $280 to win a possible $56? Makes no sense to me. I d think a single doubling from $35 to $70 on your first loss is suffecient to stay at for a few spins until you're back in session profit. If you lose a second time, double the $70 to $140 and continue any wins until you're in session profit. Lose again and just double and play it out as before until you're in session profit. But going from $35 to a triple double up to $280 is insane, only worsened by doing it a second time to over your original bankroll amount. Just taking way too much risk of ruin here playi9ng with tripple double ups. Might he have meant 3 "units" so the $35 bet becomes $105, and on another loss it becomes $315? That would be more reasonable in my view...🙂

[@JIM6167]

13 hit 4 times in 8 spins! That is crazy!!!

[@Dave_Verbeek]

Doubling 3 times is a bit crazy because thats 8 times your initial bet😮 losing 3 times before you hit a jackpotnumber is not as hard as you think so this is a very dangerous system and not for me. The 2 up 1 down on 2 dozens is a lot better

[@paulgleave7632]

Not tried a system from here in months as they always bust but tried one today and that's me back to not using them,what a mess 😅

[@dennissmith3921]

The second system, I play European roulette. I just put $1 on the 0. I brake even a lot but just leaves 4 numbers not covered.

[@gregtheblue7103]

that makes a lot more sense to me as i was thinking the same thing, and i also play european roulette

[@paulkeating944]

On the premise of a previous system thats says the 1st column should be avoided on American Roulette wheel. I would put the $12 on 3rd column and move the corners over. I won't be playing this system. One dbl spin on any of the 6 and one more your bankroll gone.

[@Snowingeverywinter]

The 2nd system is the same bet, and win as just double street martingale. Much easier to place than this system.

[@raulchavez7025]

Lenny's system works great most of the time but I never use systems with $1 units and there's no way I'm putting 1,792 bet on the table to chase a $64 profit.

[@itzamia]

Putting $35 at times $280 on what seems to have an extremely likely chance of hitting something.

[@ejvee5798]

Clyde’s system is nice. I would only double twice and spin twice at that amount. Worked out well in my test. Will try in the casino tomorrow.

[@reginaldwilliams617]

I would like this on a European wheel.

[@Hedriks]

I'd play a single zero on that game... cuts your losses down by one on every bet

[@davidreed9300]

What I find the most interesting, is the way it went 13 spins in a row without hitting red. I also think it may be better to start with a 70 dollar starting bet, and martingale just once per loss. What a rigged sim….smh.

[@williamhoudersheldt7076]

Why have you changed the name of the first system? It was called Lenny is a genius. Are you trying to make it difficult for people to find the system by name? You are not going to double 3 times on a real table with the second system.....

[@waltersblattero7688]

Another System that is absolute rubbish. Triple Martingale, Really!!!

[@ManMountainManX]

TY. 050124