I used NVIS a lot in the US Army. Percentage wise probably 40-50% of Company and up level communications were done using NVIS. The rest was terrestrial VHF or satellite comms.
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Hey Mike, good to hear real world applications like this 👍
@dirtyeric4 күн бұрын
Used NVIS a fair bit in the forces. We didn't use it for 'normal' comms, we used it to prevent others from communicating aka Jamming.
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Nice 👍
@TheSzalkowski4 күн бұрын
Great Video. I live in a holler in the mountains of Virginia. I have a home brew AS-2229 inverted vee and I usually run on 40 meters. Normally I can hit Long Island NY down to Georgia and out to Ohio/Missouri on 20 watts of power using Winlink/Olivia/ whatever I am playing with that day.
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it, thanks for checking it out 👍
@Mary-wk6of4 күн бұрын
Excellent video The SmokinApe! ☺️ Thank you!
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@csexecutiveservices3 күн бұрын
As an Extra class for nearly 7 years, this was a very digestable refresher. Well done de WA1EM
@larrynavarre3 күн бұрын
Fantastic instruction “professor”! I have studied NVIS a lot in the past year and you have done an excellent job outlining the antenna. Particularly appreciated are the diagrams and explanations. And your “art skills” are just fine. Thank you!!! N8LJN
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it Larry, thank you for watching 👍
@75ohmHAM4 күн бұрын
Awesome Slides man!!!
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Thanks Zig!
@bendeleted91554 күн бұрын
Outstanding! Thank you, Sir 👍
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Thanks for watching, glad you liked it 👍
@WG5Xradio4 күн бұрын
Good presentation. Most of the NVIS that I have seen are inverted vees. If you use two different bands at 90° angles to each other, the antenna itself effectively becomes the guy lines for the mast, and only one mast is needed. I think at some point in the future, I will experiment with both a dipole and inverted vee and see if one works better than the other.
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
I’m a big fan of inverted V antennas for the reasons you mention but you want reflectivity from the ground, a dipole is better suited for that 👍
@mikesradiorepair3 күн бұрын
@@TheSmokinApe 15 foot pole with double inverted V's like described have been the military standard NVIS antenna for over a half of a century and is what a lot of civilian NVIS antennas are based off of. Simple and it works.
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
@ somewhere around here I have a paper copy of an old military NVIS guide
@seanwood80432 күн бұрын
Short and to the point. Informative as always !
@TheSmokinApe2 күн бұрын
Thanks Sean, glad you liked it 👍
@dougdaniels4 күн бұрын
Excellent explanation. I'd never heard of using a reflector in that manner. I may try that on a POTA activation where I'll the have room to spread out that I don't have at home.
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it Doug, thanks for watching 👍
@bwillan3 күн бұрын
Very informative video. I didn't know about the reflector on a horizontal antenna.
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Glad the video was helpful 👍
@jameyevans294 күн бұрын
Do more on the reflector dipole please.
@KustomRadioFrequency4 күн бұрын
Great demonstration
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Thanks KRF 👍
@robertmeyer47444 күн бұрын
Great stuff ! Many make a NVIS style for 80 meters and don't really know it. The height above ground. The reflector adds gain . I have had odd DX over summer on 10 meters. Very short. some call that NVIS but are wrong. 10 meter band can have speritac E or tropospheric ducting happen. 6 meters does it more often. I talked 10 meter SSB from Boston NY to NYC last summer. And a few FT8 as well. Very short DX . NVIS does work most of the time and at solar min . That's why the military has frequencies in HF set aside for them. 73
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Hey Robert, thanks for watching 👍
@AndrewCCM4 күн бұрын
Love it. Was just thinking about searching out a vid on this very subject... Yours popped up by telepathy... :)
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@pauldenisowski4 күн бұрын
Very interesting presentation of this material - looking forward to future videos.
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
@@pauldenisowski thanks Paul, glad you liked it 👍
@wildbill14 күн бұрын
Great explanation on NVIS
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Thanks Bill 👍
@keithtreisch68903 күн бұрын
My 40m ocfd does good. Dx and nvis. Lately been experiencing a loss of nvis when the trmperatruee dropped this past week. At night my buddy and i lose contact in the evening time . Been fun expeurencing the change if propogation around the country on different vands.
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
It’s probably propagation changing 👍
@hikingfish33 күн бұрын
This video made me subscribe. Great explanation! Would love to see a follow up with actual antenna setups and maybe showing a qso map to prove where all the contacts were made. Would be great!
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it HF3, I can see what I can do about the antenna 👍
@JeffreyWilliams-x4xКүн бұрын
Thank you thank you Chrystal clear thank you 73
@TheSmokinApeКүн бұрын
You are welcome! Glad you found it helpful. 👍
@45auto4 күн бұрын
Thanks for mentioning the height of the reflector being just above ground. I've had a copy of a similar graph for some time, but it doesn't specify that distance off the ground.
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
You're welcome, glad it helped! 👍
@BBaldwin4 күн бұрын
NVIS is something that has interested me for some time now, but as you stated, ya gotta have a dancing partner to make it work!
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
It's pretty cool though, right?
@deirdre_anne3 күн бұрын
The information about a reflector is very useful. I have a CF dipole that, due to my location, can't get much about 15-20 feet (and is between two houses, so it doesn't have a view of the horizon, and I've noticed it works OK for DX but also sometimes for NVIS (I mainly know from 40m nets). However, I do not have a reflector. I may see about installing a reflector to see how that affects my communications. Thanks.
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Good luck with it and thanks for watching 👍
@donausmus42814 күн бұрын
Ape, unless I missed it, you didn't explain the critical frequency and its more direct effect on NVIS. Although MUF and CF are related, CF is a more precise measurement and readily available on VOACAP. Of course, the 75-90 degree propagation is best close to or just below the CF. MUF is much more imprecise and subjective, involving transmit and receive locations. I appreciate your work and all your videos. Don K1DLA
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Fair point, thanks Don 👍
@VP2EIHonAnguillaIsland2 күн бұрын
Good stuff tnx for sharing.. 73 🎙Ira
@TheSmokinApe2 күн бұрын
@@VP2EIHonAnguillaIsland Glad you liked it 👍
@cynnahunter7516Күн бұрын
love you and your videos, but can't get on board with joining the ARRL...
@TheSmokinApeКүн бұрын
I’m a fan but I totally understand 👍
@Siskiyous64 күн бұрын
NVIS is plan B when the new antenna doesn't work DX
@AndrewCCM4 күн бұрын
Or RMA... ;)
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Haha!
@briansalsbery99683 күн бұрын
Is a 40m EFHW in POTA sloper or inverted V config going to behave more like an NVIS antenna? If so, this could explain why 40m is relatively useless for Seattle area POTA since the 400-mile sweet spot is mostly uninhabited whereas it cuts through huge population centers for east coast POTA activators.
@TheSmokinApe2 күн бұрын
For NVIS to work correctly both stations need to have an antenna mounted in a low configuration, you want the gain pointing up 👆
@dangerwillrobinson233 күн бұрын
Thank you for the video. The low band EFHW antennas where one end is thrown up in a tree and the inverted vee dipole antennas supported by a mast for SOTA/POTA activations, are they working by NVIS? Or, is it skywave propagation, only compromised, because a lot of the radiation is working like an NVIS antenna?
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
If they are very low to the ground you will do better with NVIS but remember frequency is important 👍
@AndrewCCM4 күн бұрын
Stupid question... For the reflector in the last slide, would that just be another strand of wire (provided that your dipole is the same)? Just getting started here, but dove in the deep end over the past 6 weeks... LOL. Thanks in advance
@TheSmokinApe4 күн бұрын
Yep same wire, just a different strand 👍
@BobBob-il2ku3 күн бұрын
How reliable will NVIS be if both stations are using dipoles at the correct heights. & using digital modes js8call/VARAC ect? I know it will depend on time of day/year ect but can you expect to make contact 90% of the time?
@TheSmokinApe3 күн бұрын
Not very, in the far field plots you can see the gain radiation patterns, both antennas should be mounted in an NVIS configuration 👍
@webanon4 күн бұрын
Great work, Ape! Topic adjacent/aligned. Viewers might be interested in “The HF Renaissance in the US Army” on the Radio Club of America Channel kzbin.info/www/bejne/b4Kslnpqgc55g8k Start around 24:30. Interestingly, they were able to COMM at very low power levels and their watchdog technology wasn’t able to DF at those levels. TL;DR: In OPSEC plan, use minimum power needed for establishing NVIS COMMS or the watchdog tech will find you…