Is The Invicta Pro Diver As Good As The Rolex Submariner?

If you're interested, check out the Invicta Pro Diver at my affiliate shop: amzn.to/3d9iAk4
thetimetellers...
My Watchmaker: www.tictocwatc...
Affiliate links to some great watch gear:
Watch Tool Kit: amzn.to/2XoqM8x
Spring bar kit: amzn.to/2CRdw2G
Barton sailcloth strap: amzn.to/2rTZ0oQ
Hadley roma ostrich strap: amzn.to/2XnUCdi
Mancave leather rally strap: www.etsy.com/s...
Caliper tool: amzn.to/37oXIT8
Poly watch: amzn.to/2Ktc2Qn
Microfiber cloth: amzn.to/2OnaloT
Watch Roll: amzn.to/35hNzWx
Watch Pod: amzn.to/2Ok5e97
Wolf carrying case: amzn.to/2XvoHb6
A Man And His Watch: amzn.to/2prIAmF
G-Shock DW5600: amzn.to/2OpRfyz
www.amazon.com...

[@troyclements806]

JOry coming with some great content latley, keep it up buddy, love the channel

[@matrixmirage2148]

_,,There are Invicta fanboys"_ Me: Are there...? 🤔

[@miguelsanchezramirez1987]

Hello, you can buy the Invicta Pro Diver watch here! Free Shipping amzn.to/2XrYVqd

[@LlyleHunter]

@@matrixmirage2148 There are actually still Mavado fanboys said 1988.

[@gunnerman1880]

I'm currently into nubeo and RGMT

[@thomastanczos6375]

Is the fit and finish of a Rolex worth the extra 8,500$?

[@karkirch]

My Rolex was stolen at knifepoint Sept 2000. I bought my Invicta (shown above) a month after. It's been 21 yrs and it's a fantastic watch. Had I known about Invicta, I would've never bothered with my Rolex!!! Live and learn !!! Have a great day!!

[@DirtHero75]

how often did you service it?

[@Newlifestyle307]

@@DirtHero75 lmao I wouldn't service a invicta just buy another

[@urbnctrl]

@@DirtHero75 if you want to keep it for a lifetime you would be good with once every decade. After 10 years it should be serviced. - you could buy a new one as well, but I prefer keeping the things I have rather than replacing and throwing away

[@aviationnerd7806]

The lesson you learned should of been learning how to better protect yourself, not buying a cheap watch. But to each their own I guess

[@anthax1]

You bought a rolex for a reason, no way invicta can replace that

[@kschuman1152]

The question really should be "is an Invicta + $10,000 in the bank as good as a Rolex?"...

[@llary]

I'm not a Rolex fan but you could easily resell a popular Rolex model for the same or more than you bought it for in future so the comparison is a bit more complicated

[@healthycitizen1926]

I agree with this comment . Most people nowadays mainly Americans such as myself go by brand and buy things like a rolex over a invicta watch which both tell time , or to impress people who dont really care about you because those who care about you dont care about how much your watch cost☮️❤️

[@SURENITY]

@@healthycitizen1926 Well said.

[@dbest8083]

@@healthycitizen1926 It depends: some people don't buy a watch just to tell the time (if everyone did that, mechanical watches would not exist, as they're more expensive and less accurate than quartz), they buy it because of the history behind a certain watch (for example, people willing to buy the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch cal.321 don't just buy it for the status, but because of the watch's historical significance as a reissue of the first watch on the moon) or because of the timepiece's durability compared to others (which is why Casio G-Shock is such a popular brand when it comes to rugged and resistant watches, as they built their entire brand identity around this niche). Buying a watch to impress your peers is wrong (unless you yourself also really like the watch) as it's guaranteed you'll eventually grow dissatisfied of it. You should buy a watch for yourself and yourself only (unless it's a gift for someone else).

[@sithukyaw9019]

@@llary not true

[@GustoTheGamer]

The fact that you can compare a $80 Watch vs a $8000.- watch is insane! So do we pay to much for a Rolex? I think this is a yes!

[@mountainjay]

*too

[@therealcountrybumpkin]

*tooo

[@robillingworth8503]

When I bought my Invicta I didn't even know about potential comparisons to Rolex. I just wanted *a Quality watch. *Hey, it's an Automatic! My last automatic was a gift that lasted over 25 years! *Waterproof *Looks great for special occasions or when I'm singing in concerts *You can't beat all this for $51.99!! Who needs to spend $10,000 on a luxury timepiece

[@therealcountrybumpkin]

@@robillingworth8503 plus you don’t have to worry about being robbed and killed over a $10,000 watch. Idk I can’t see the value of any watch being $300. Especially since society is falling apart

[@nickinportland]

Prob pay too much but I mean there is no comparison 😂. You pay for the quality and reliability plus the name. And hey if you don’t care and just want to get the look go for it. I have a Rolex and a timex. I wear the timex every day.

[@merc7paul]

I have a Rolex submariner, my friend has a Invicta sub, we don't even talk about it everyone thinks we wear the same watch

[@carlkim2577]

Haha. It seems you touched a nerve. And agreed. Most people don't know enough to tell the diff.

[@josephk7530]

@@firstdurhamite1142 both of you are waterheads

[@josephk7530]

@@gowthamsiddarth20 you’re a jealous waterhead

[@luiscastro5456]

@@firstdurhamite1142 hahaha, I want to know that too.

[@jakekaywell5972]

@@firstdurhamite1142 It implies that your cranium does not have a brain, hence water would be the only material remaining.

[@PhobosTV1]

Pro diver is my main watch for 5 years. I never took it off my wrist on my daily basis. I have been diving, snorkeling swimming and everything without worrying. The mineral glass and the metals are extremely well built. Seiko NH35 movement also is very reliable.

[@jeembaymusic5271]

Do you shower with it ?

[@PhobosTV1]

@@jeembaymusic5271 wtf, of course yes

[@VolkswagenGolf2GTI]

Did you have to have the watch serviced?

[@PhobosTV1]

@@VolkswagenGolf2GTI never

[@zhwilson2437]

*tooo

[@jovonne529]

Loved the review. Admittedly, I don't own a Rolex and have never handled one in real life. However, I do own four Invictas, including two dive model automatics. All of my Invictas look great and have been super reliable. You simply cannot beat Invicta's quality for the money. As another commenter stated, they really are built like tanks. I have a 200M and a 300M for the dive watches. I certainly didn't buy them for the Rolex look. I bought them because they were Invicta!

[@larryvincent3116]

It is a lot to do with quality versus looks and price .if you want a woman who's out for your money the get the Rolex If you want a daily wear nice watch.dont waste your money on a Rolex and have it calibrated and cleaned every couple years. That's just my opinion

[@chefpetey]

Been wearing my pro diver since 2000. Never serviced. It will never die. Even the gold tone has not worn off. Keeps perfect time. Mine has the miyota/citizen mvmt

[@TheCometHunter]

After the oils dry up and start attracting dust, you're gonna wish you took that watch in for an occasional preventative maintenance! Totally ignoring ANY mechanical machine is just irresponsible ownership!

[@cwalke32477]

@@TheCometHunter who's going to service a $100 watch?! just wait till it dies and get another. It ain't a Rolex.

[@horeastefanescu2677]

@@TheCometHunter Calm down man, after 20 years owning an Invicta I believe no one will give a crap if the coating will wear off/

[@popporooful]

Just replase the movement when it dries off. Will be cheaper than getting it serviced and you can do it yourself with a bit of preparation and research. This is why I like the seiko NH-line in cheapos because it's so ubiquitous

[@josuet4805]

@@popporooful exactlyyyy jasjaj

[@bulldogms]

I wouldn’t expect a $100 watch to feel like an $8k watch.

[@MultiMusickLover]

If you hold both of them with closed eyes you won't know which is which if not for the etching and glass caseback. My point is that the Invicta doesn't feel like a £100 watch, more like a 3k :)

[@edlauren9434]

The guy just spent 30 mins to explain to us that $80 and $8000 watches don't feel the same...

[@bth2278]

@@MultiMusickLover buy all of the invicta you want. They will never be a rolex lol. Sorry

[@MultiMusickLover]

@@bth2278 I see that you don't understand my comment but that's ok :) it will never be a Rolex, that's more than obvious. It's just a watch that looks and feels more expensive than it actually is.

[@bth2278]

@@MultiMusickLover the same can be said for a piece of iron compared to a piece of gold.

[@91lifetime23]

I have the Swiss movement version and changed a few things.. changed the bezel to a high quality ceramic bezel, added a sapphire crystal and changed the bracelet to a full stainless steel with no polish. I love it, it looks great, runs great and it has taken a few bad hits and still 0 scratches, i use it almost every day

[@Fausto_Fauquer]

You could have avoided all that by simply buying the Steeldive version of this Rolex and you would be set. I will never buy this Invicta watch until it gets a sapphire crystal and a milled locking clasp instead of the cheap looking stamped clasp it currently comes with. Steeldive did not cut corners like Invicta and more and more people are starting to buy that watch.

[@91lifetime23]

@@Fausto_Fauquer i like to wear things nobody has, with the 4 changes i made to the watch it feels different and special, i also prefer 40mm case than 41mm and swiss movement over japan movement

[@LilBlighter]

To me, never mind the Rolex, I'm saving up for the Invicta Pro Diver. I couldn't care less if it's a homage watch. I just like the look, the decent quality build and it'll fall within my budget. Thanks for the comparison video.

[@mrselfdestruct1180]

If you have to save up for an Invicta and you are over 16 years old. You got problems. And probably shouldn’t be buying a watch.

[@yelnickmcwawa5858]

@@mrselfdestruct1180 man shut the fuck up. You don't have to dis man

[@2911moj]

@@mrselfdestruct1180 oh piss off man, not everyone has the luxury of disposable income to spend on "wants" rather than "needs".

[@mrselfdestruct1180]

@@2911moj bro I’m just sayin, if you gotta save up to buy a 60 dollar watch, why buy a watch? Use your cell phone to tell the time.

[@ander3024]

@@mrselfdestruct1180 Or maybe you just don't live in the US or Europe? Not all the countries have the same purchasing power.

[@papua5028]

Saving $8,400+ and still having a 95% similar to the Rolex Submariner watch on my wrisk is what would makes me happy. Great comparison BTW,

[@kevinmontoya7318]

I actually like the wings on the second hand it reminds me of an old aviation based watch

[@FourtyOunce]

Me too

[@shonkeymoulder6972]

That pro diver looks mighty fine. Good affordable watch.

[@miguelsanchezramirez1987]

Hello, you can buy the Invicta Pro Diver watch here! Free Shipping amzn.to/2XrYVqd

[@yungsammysosa6201]

Its a great watch I own one

[@ryanbriones4026]

it's a fantastic watch for the price. an actual diver watch you can comfortably take diving.

[@carlitosway01]

I have this Pro Diver and I love it. I also love Japanese watches like Seiko, Citizen, Orient, Casio, etc. that are between $150 - $700 and many are of a super quality, the movement, design and materials on these watches are of great quality. But I think is ridiculous to even think than a $100 watch can be compared to a $10k one.

[@taz24787]

The ridiculous thing is that he compared them, and was not able to find a truly significant difference. And by far not a 8100% value difference.

[@asburycollins9182]

​@@taz24787some of that is in designing and marketing. But ofc the real price of rmanufacturering is never getting close to the sticker price. Invicta just put a logo on a copy. So they have way less overhead. Youre paying for originiality etc. Same as any other Luxury good

[@rudyvasquez4512]

I'm just weird, all the Invicta bashing actually makes me want one now lol.....

[@chris_mo_904]

They are great watches with a huge variety I love them I have a collection

[@jamesmurphy1480]

I actually on the same exact invicta I love it I bought one for my son as well

[@justinlarsen2281]

I have an auto and a quartz. Love both of them

[@henryviiifake8244]

Lmao people love to hate Invicta because of their loud and gaudy watches, so when they actually drop something excellent, it just blows people's minds 🤣

[@nickd7568]

I’m buying one just for the hell of it.

[@nicholasdavies6264]

I own 3 Invicta divers and I can say they are a tough well made watch keep great time ! Brilliant value 👍

[@brianfuller757]

I've had two other Pro Divers and recently bought another. I don't like most Invicta models but Pro Divers are a good value for money. Spot on about branding.

[@alanroberts6918]

I like the branding it's cool

[@owlstead]

I agree, but then again I like Danish design, i.e. watches with a specific look but without too much going on when looking at it. The Pro Diver that I bought is **very** overstated. And IMHO the stainless steel + black is boring as hell, so I bought a blue with gold detailed one. I'll probably regret that :)

[@Shmozone]

100% recommend putting a nato strap on the Invicta, makes for a great casual watch. Much more comfortable than the metal bracelet it comes with too, I couldn't get mine to fit perfectly.

[@marioesquivel7965]

Really enjoyed watching this review. Would love to own a sub at some point. I currently own the Invicta Pro, I also own Ginault Ocean Rover, both of these models get the most hate on forums. For me that's fine, I enjoy them for what they are....affordable alternatives.

[@Luminariouso]

Have had my Invicta Pro Diver for a bit over a year and has worn it daily. It has went through hell, banged up, scratched and chipped but it still runs strong with its battle scars. I've actually cracked the edge of the crystal and was a bit concerned about its water resistance but it seems to hold pretty well still.

[@steveakka]

Poor man's Rolex?...more like a wise man's Rolex 😁... The Invicta is great 👍....

[@notoriousene9880]

Seriously, imagine paying an extra $10,000 because the date is magnified a little better lol

[@TheRealFC]

Most people have families to feed, or a job to maintain. They don't want to spend $10K for a dive watch that they won't use for diving. Wise men buy cheap!

[@billysinge8977]

Looks good. True wise man’s Rolex is a Tudor Black Bay 58, an all round great deal. Prestigious but won’t break the bank, and a great watch.

[@jakekaywell5972]

@@TheRealFC A saying that I've stuck with thorough my life is that I'm too poor to buy cheap. Inexpensive would be a better word to use.

[@robertwymyslo9921]

@@notoriousene9880 people that waste there money on a rollie really dont know what time it is

[@WatsonTBass]

Bang for the buck, I LOVE the pro diver. I got the blue one for Father's day for $72 and its beautiful. At 100x less cost than a Rolex, I wear it to my job where it could easily get broken and I'm not worried. And, I LOVE an exhibition caseback. All mechanical movements I love to see. It has gained about 7 seconds in a month with just regular daily wear. So, for my purposes, and for a first automatic watch, it works great. I'm not trying to impress anyone else. If I did want to, I'd wear my '67 Seamaster chrono.

[@dgillies5420]

Exhibition caseback is one place the invicta crushes Rolex ...

[@fabriziodutto7508]

Thank you for this in-depth review! I got some Invicta, actually I own this very model. I've never worn it. It is sitting inside its original package... After your disamina, I will take my Invicta pro-dive out for a walk. At the moment I'm really inlove with my Glycine combat sub (pre invicta, just to say). I've bought it second hand, but it opened my heart from the first moment I wore it. I own many watches, including Swiss, Russian but mostly Japanese ones, few Chinese ones. I hope one day to save enough to allow myself to buy a Breitling Chromomat or maybe a Tudor Black Bay, these are my goals. The Rolex are far more expensive for my wallet. Hope everyone is good! Cheers to everyone!

[@markhansen3111]

To me it seems like the Invicta Pro Diver is a great value. I do not think you can beat this watch as a value. Comparing this watch to a Rolex is indeed a testimony to the value. I wear it as an every day do anything type watch. TY MH

[@CJ-222]

Honestly, I prefer the look of the Invicta over the Rolex. I know it's older but the Rolex just looks dated. The Invicta is more modern looking to me. The Rolex logo and an extra couple gaskets aren't worth anywhere near an almost $8k difference in my opinion. Invicta all day. You can buy 80+ Invictas for the same money and never once get caught wearing the same piece in public twice. An overwhelming majority wouldn't even be able to distinguish between the two if the logos were removed, which probably doesn't sit well with people who dump the equivalent of a used car's worth on a wrist timepiece. This isn't the 19th or 20th century anymore, watches should not cost more than $500 unless it's a legitimate antique or collector's item.

[@LeechUFC]

To be completely fair a junk used car the price of a rolex would eventually be worth so little you’d be paying more to keep it running or to get rid of it than it costs while a roley will more often than not appreciate in value And since Rolex’s ARE collectors items, that’s their high price tag, which you mention as well

[@epifan3_]

Best comment

[@yelnickmcwawa5858]

Wtf are you talking about there's not a lot of difference

[@DavidABSmith]

Great review. I have a 1675 GMT with a 93150 sub bracelet and a few Invicta Pro Divers. The Invictas are good for scuba diving (in case it gets lost) and when I am nervous about theft (traveling, etc.). That said, my Rolex exudes quality & longevity; my son will inherit it and I hope cherish it. The Invictas, although essentially Rolex copies fulfill a different purpose.

[@TheShotenZenjin]

Lots of Rolex owners may well be wearing Invictas come Christmas.

[@lool12366]

Lotta Invicta owner might be wearing Rolexes come Christmas.

[@davidswiggett8389]

Umm.....No.

[@johnstrachan2726]

Not me, would rather commit suicide.

[@Rfpepe7295]

john strachan “snob alert”!

[@johnstrachan2726]

@@Rfpepe7295 Wrong again. I wear Seikos and G-Shocks as well as the Rolex. Thank you.

[@MrCwdawg]

Fair review, I thought. Thanks for making all of these entertaining videos. My two-cents is there is a place for Invicta and there is a place for Rolex. I appreciate that Invicta makes this watch, even though I know it's blatantly unfair as an imitation design and many of Invicta's diverse original designs have a tendency to be... a bit 'out there.' I own the Invicta and will probably never own that Rolex Submariner. 3 general things I have come to notice and/or appreciate about Invicta: 1) They make watches on a large-scale with very high economies of scale to bring down costs. The market for people who won't pay more than $100 for a watch is huge. They are managing to produce good watches with such limitations. The watches they are producing for these masses are pretty good for them. They're water-proof and they can be banged around a little bit and if something happens, they're ultimately at a price point they're replaceable. 2) Cheap watches help us find our style before shelling out a ton of money. I know some argue this as a waste, but I appreciated those early years when my budget was tight that I could start my collection and try many things. It was through this I learned what I liked and what I didn't before I spent more money. These watches, and many others, are like a gateway drug. I developed my personal taste in watches over many years. Present-me does not see things the same way as Past-me. This Invicta allows me to not experience the prestige, attention to detail, or as solid construction of the Rolex. However, it does allow me to come close to experiencing the general style and that is something I appreciate and I'm glad to have in my varied collection. 3) Less of an appreciation and more of a criticism. You still get what you pay for. What gets cheaper with mass production, comes at a loss of quality and quality control. The luxury brands are created with heavy marketing, but that also means they protect that marketing by trying to create perfection. You can't sell something $5,000+ and have it break easily or not ensure that all watches you produce carry the same quality and be able to maintain the value of that brand. I have owned 3 Invicta watches. This version of the diver watch I own had the rotating bezel break within 2 weeks of owning it without heavy usage, improper usage, or being knocked around at all. I suspect the ratcheting part inside was creating too friction and bent itself out of place. Another watch was not an imitation, but a self-designed army style. It was actually a decent built watch in terms of how solid the construction was, but it has some major errors in the attention to detail of the design that I didn't notice until I bought it and wore it. Problems: 1) the hour and minute hands were black with a large lume design in the center. The dial was black. The design of the Lume on both hands was about the same size. I couldn't tell time at a glance. I had to look more carefully for the end of the black hands. 2) It had a rotating sub-dial that pointed to the day of the week. They used a push-button to rotate it. The watch was not a chronograph, but wanted it to have the appearance of one. They problem is it was way too easy to bump that button. The movement broke and is no longer functional, but the earliest problem was this subdial broke and soon after the hour hand wouldn't move either. I believe the button for the subdial was activated during times that could damage the movement if it was adjusted. The movements are often budget range movements from reputable companies As a buyer... lessons learned, however I expect these types of issues to not come up if someone is designing and developing them with a critical eye. Still, I've enjoyed my Invicta Diver with the now non-rotating bezel. When I buy my first multi-thousand dollar diver, I will probably get a Omega Seasmaster. I still appreciated the Invicta's and other cheap brands of the world that allowed me to try different styles over time and allowed me to learn my personal interests in style to help in making those decisions. For now my main diver is still a far more budget friendly Bulova Oceanographer. I like the throwback to the past, I appreciate designs that come from a heritage of American crasftmanship, and I appreciate that it is a watch fewer people wear and allows me to be more unique. I fully agree with you about the depth of the casing to the dial. I noticed this wearing the Invicta diver. That was my biggest criticism of the Invicta diver personally. They do make the finish of it look better or more interesting, if it is left that large. Beyond the size of that metal wall, It looks cheaply brushed. Thanks for all of the interesting videos!

[@Jivingturkeysmasher]

I was very hesitant on buying the invicta, I have bulova's, omega's & grand seiko's. I want a Rolex, however my grand seiko imo is a better watch then a Rolex. But, it isn't a Rolex! -Invicta, I use as a work watch. If I scratch it, I don't worry about it. It's definitely a nice watch for the price, I get a lot of positive comments on it from customers. It is definitely an eye catcher for people who know watches! I like it!

[@cheeseonyomama]

I've worn Invicta for years and this is a very fair review. The whole point of the Pro Divers is that it looks and almost feels like a Rolex, but it isn't. As such it's an attractive and affordable watch for people who don't have dinner guests to impress at their Napa Valley wine club, or don't need that extra 100m of diving depth lol "I'm not arguing the Invicta is a bad watch, I'm arguing it doesn't feel the same as the Rolex." For a 7-8 thousand price difference it shouldn't, and I don't expect it to.

[@jukimainecoon3765]

Well yeah no shit it’s only 100 dollars lol

[@larrykeys8264]

@@jukimainecoon3765 that’s what he’s saying bro lol

[@dgillies5420]

The basic blueprint for a dive watch makes it a great product. Invicta doesn't skimp much on any part of their design, hence, it has become a perennial best-sellet!

[@BD19922]

I love my Invicta Pro Diver Mickey Mouse edition. I will never compare it to a Rolex, for me, these are two completely different watches

[@alessioflammia2028]

I love my Spongebob limited edition too 💚💛💙

[@Tempusverum]

“Whoooooo” “Who lives in a pineapple under the sea?!!”

[@albion2742]

I happen to like the wings on the second hand with the little cross on the wings.

[@comickebs748]

Great review! New-ish Invicta Pro Diver owner here. I picked up a full-titanium version. Not the current Pro Diver 0420 with a girth of 45mm case. Mine is the Pro Diver 4790, which is literally the 8926 size-wise in full titanium. Wonderfully light, utilizes ye olde Miyota 8215, a solid timekeeper and insanely difficult to find. Sure, I could go for Tudor’s Pelagos in titanium, which are plentiful and beautiful. But the rarity of the Invicta 4790 (and the price tag) is too hard to not enjoy & scratch that Subby itch.

[@BassMatriX]

21:07 Jory: So, this isn't going to glow at all. Me, a pro diver owner: Neither is the Invicta, buddy! Trololol. The pro diver is always going to be a special watch for me. It's what got me into this hobby. I bought it on happenstance, not even knowing what an automatic watch was. While it has that emotional value for me, let's be real, ya gets what ya pays for.

[@joehooper2960]

same.

[@johnturnerjr7221]

I think that's cool. If this Invicta got you into the watch game, then welcome. I just don't understand this comparison.

[@alanwright3172]

So I can have an “extra” 100 m wr and 9 extra hours and a huge servicing commitment or I can have a watch which I can cheaply replace if I need to AND a car🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ryanoliver5669]

I don't think anyone that wears a Rolex is going to be driving any $8k cars

[@alanwright3172]

@C. N. :-)

[@gameroftheyear1000]

@@ryanoliver5669 well 8K is definitely a good down payment on a mid range car. I mean that’s a smidge under half for a brand new Honda Accord or a new Camry. The car itself doesn’t have to cost that much.

[@gshockbabe6144]

Im wearing my steel and gold bluesey Pro Diver while watching this.I also have the all gold version with the black dial.Great tool watches.

[@abellustgarten1446]

I bought an Invicta last week.....very good quality I would say

[@mattsavage6365]

The large engraved INVICTA letters on the casing is my least favorite part of this watch, too.

[@richardbrown8099]

If it's good enough for blancpain.

[@TheRealDrJoey]

I don't know if it's true, but I've read that the reason they put it on there had to do with Rolex's lawyers. I think it looks nice. I bought a Pro Diver in January, and I love it, including the flying wing counterbalance. I've wanted a Subbie since I was a kid, and last December, on my birthday, I realized I was never going to live long enough to afford one. I would prefer a Rolex to the Invicta, except for the fact that a Pro Diver costs about 1/150th that of a new Submariner, which was a factor in my decision. And of course there's a waiting list for Subbies. That too. BTW, Seiko movement keeping pretty good time for the money. Last set it 28 days ago today and it is 2:14 slow right now. 90 bucks is hard to beat. I'm not really a "collector" more of a penniless spectator, but if I ever do start collecting, it will be epic CHEAP watches. That Starking is an excellent example. Also, I have a 38mm Timex Navi-Harbor--man, I LOVE that thing! Maybe I'm more of a contrarian than a collector;>)

[@vcusa20009]

Matt Savage yea that I could do without as well.

[@Supremish]

Agreed, thought it was a good looking watch up until I saw that.

[@zachhoward9099]

It doesn't annoy me as much as it once did but I totally agree with you on the logo being unnecessary on there

[@Eric-hk9pg]

Never thought I would say this in a million years but this video has made me seriously contemplate buying an Invicta.

[@Dr.Gunsmith]

I know Invicta get some bad press but They not all that bad considering the price, also it looks good too.

[@LeePsycho]

So I love my watches have many. My daily timepiece is an Invicta Pro Diver Titanium. I have to say after 5-6 years of wear the clips clasps and crown are all very smooth now. The Crown is tight fitting yet very smooth now. I love the balance and the moderate weight. I had a stainless Invicta Pro Diver, and the weight took a long time to get used to. Try the titanium!

[@scousewillo62]

I am looking for a watch or two for my 60th later this year. I would like a SeaGull ST1901 movement watch, probably the Red Star 1963 40mm gooseneck 21 jewel at around £140 but the Invicta Pro Diver looks like a very good contender for under £100. I actually like the second hand and etched logo on the side to show it is not trying to be a 1:1 clone. Nice review and new sub

[@lllADemiRlll]

Great video, liked everything in it. I'm not an Invicta fan, but I do appreciate their homage watches. I bought a $75 Invicta pro diver which I can use anywhere, went to beach with it, went to the water with it, didn't mind the sand or small rocks getting all over the watch, because it was cheap. On the other hand, I haven't seen a person with a Rolex or Omega doing the same, they usually use these high quality watches for dinner, meetings, etc. It has become a valuable "show off" watch, and there is nothing wrong with that. It would be nice to see a rolex submariner being used for what it was built for: a diver watch, but no one will do that due to its high cost. So yeah, that's why I appreciate the Invicta pro diver (not the other monstrosities) it has the looks and is built to resist beach/ocean activities without the worry of losing an expensive item.

[@stantheman5163]

I have the same series Submariner but in gold and steel. Received it as an employee bonus back in 1988 or so. I selected it personally as I had always loved the look of that watch, plus I was a James Bond fan since the age of 10. I wore that watch 24/7 until about a year ago when I sent it in to be refurbished. The tritium was flaking off the dial, I had chipped a small piece off the edge of the crystal, the arms were experiencing some sort of degradation and I really wanted to be able to tell time in the dark without having to find my phone. The cost of the upgrades were half the price of the watch, but it is now like new except that the luminescence is only on the arms and bezel pearl, and not the hour markers. Some would say that I ruined the patina of the original, but I use this watch as a tool and not as an investment. I wore this watch while surfing, rock climbing, mountain biking, diving, skiing and everything else. Great watch and not one for the penny-pinchers, but it is worth triple what it cost brand new. The watch this replaced was a Seiko and I loved that one as well. I agree with the opinions stated in this review. I also think that for the price, the Invicta is a total bargain since most people don't care anyway. Wear what makes you happy, even if it's just counting the money you saved. I saved over $100k by not buying the Porsche GT-3 I covet. LOL.

[@gnash58]

I recently picked up one of these on Amazon during a Black Friday sale for $30. I was just looking for an inexpensive analog watch that was all metal. I'm not even close to being a watch aficionado and I had no clue that this was a Rolex look-alike. I feel I definitely got something worth more than I paid for and have no complaints at all. It does exactly what I need it to do - it sits on my wrist, looks good, and keeps decent time.

[@smartmouthriveria]

Jory !!! I'm so proud you own a invicta! We're best friends now lol

[@henrymorgan6087]

I own an Invicta pro diver…it works…well…no issues…I like he Rolex look…I don’t have Rolex $$…not sure I’d spend it on a watch if I did…good video that actually inhances my opinion of the Invicta.

[@ExAnimoPortugal]

I love the look of the Rolex, but I would never spend more than 3 figures on a watch. The Invicta is a much more reasonable alternative. Yes, it's derivative, but imitation is the sincerest form of flattery

[@kennethwallace2102]

I am 53 years old, I graduated in 1987- my junior year my dad was going to buy a rolex from a dealer he knew he asked me if I would like to get a submariner. He said yes it's costly but it's a good watch- stainless steel it would cost me $750 now mind you now now a stainless steel sub mariner is running $17,000 that is absolutely ridiculous it is the same watch it was 30 years ago! Because it's limited in production and it's popular people are paying astronomical amounts for them above retail... far above retail! I personally have a Breitling Super Avenger with a factory diamond dial... it's my dress watch 48mm. I don't like rolex because I am a bigger guy and at 40mm it's small in my opinion and overnflated in cost. I.E. a Rolex Daytona can cost you 40k plus. Rolex is just a name- it is a good watch and as people have mentioned it does go up in value because people are dumb enough to pay the escalated prices which drives the market. I personally have about a dozen invicta watches between my wife and myself. The nice thing- the invicta watches that I wear I'm not afraid of scratching them, I wear them anywhere because I didn't have to pay $10K like I did for my Breitling! If you can afford one go for it... BUT KNOW THIS- there are so many swiss made fake rolex watches half the people will think it's fake anyway! FACT!

[@ciriloortiz6070]

I will never pay 8k just for the name, that's stupid 😒, is my opinion!!!

[@Liberty-rn4wy]

I bought one in about 2005 and lost it. I just a new one and am VERY impressed by the Invicta. It feels very robust and well built. I just saw a video on KZbin of a guy who had one for 18 years and it is still running.

[@MrBanegasgaleas]

Invicta it for the people who like the LOOK of the Rolex Sub, if you want all what you describe (feel, sharpness) then buy a Rolex. Good video keep ‘em coming.

[@Tbone51]

I have found that a fine, quality watch typically feels different that cheaper watches. That said, there are some good watches that are a great bargain and I have found that Invicta is one of those. I've owned a standard Invicta Pro Diver, 40mm, quartz watch for seven years. I've never had an issue. It's very comfortable and looks a lot like the Rolex. I have had a number of more expensive, mid range watches like Tissot, Tag, Luminox (not Rolex) and found that one difference is the quality and feel of the band or bracelet (usually a metal bracelet). It's important to have a comfortable, accurate, good looking watch. With Invicta, if you have a problem (loss or damage), it's just under a $100. Even if I could afford it, I would not want to have a $6,000 - $10,000 watch on my wrist. The important thing is to get what you like and enjoy it!

[@michaelnicholas2417]

Hey, neither an Invicta or Rolex fan boy here. You're obviously a Rolex fan boy based on your review. To each his own, just like you mentioned. However, if you want somebody to sit through one of your comparisons, you need to make it come across less biased, especially since you call out your viewers hat leave biased remarks in the comments section. I watched the video and the only thing I came away with was that you personally prefer the Rolex cosmetically and the materials used. That is fine... your opinion. The video is supposed to compare the $100 Invicta to the $8,200 Rolex. OBVIOUSLY the Rolex is going to be the better timepiece. Look at the price difference as well as who these manufacturers market their watches to. I was hoping for a 'dollar for dollar' breakdown between the watches, with the end result not being based on your preferences. Yes, you are entitled to that opinion of yours, but how does your biased opinion help someone trying to make an unbiased opinion on a watch they want to get the most value for their dollar for? And, do some editing and speed things along. Too much time watching you unbox, resize, measure and what not. My suggestion is do those things off-camera and simply report your findings. Other than some grommets in the crown, less branding and a smoother flowing second hand, you haven't come even close to convincing me which timepiece is the best bang for the buck.

[@ricksandstorm]

Make a vid about the 1953 version of the pro diver! :)

[@DANTHETUBEMAN]

I just looked at that,,, great looking watch.

[@loriosterweil982]

I now own 2 Rolex Datejusts. I’m on a waitlist for a Bluesy Sub and keep getting pushed back in line for more preferential clients. I love Rolex but hate their policies. If Rolex were a person, they would be telling me “tell me what you want, you can’t have it.” If Invicta were a person, they’d be saying “ what color would you like?” I have both and know that Invicta is not even on the same planet as Rolex. However, Invicta actually wants my business and is attainable. There’s something to be said for that!

[@andrewe.8321]

I have an Invicta pro diver, same as the one reviewed. I do not own a Rolex sub, nor would I really want one (I like the Oyster Perpetual), but this Invicta does the job. I’ve brought it with me on numerous vacations with lots of swimming in both the ocean and pools, and I can honestly say it’s worth the money.

[@uhhTabby]

Have had the Invicta pro diver for a year love it. Really really good in person and keeps good time if you wear it all the time. Otherwise power reserve is about 2 days. Really nice weight and feel, definitely worth if if you're looking at it.

[@FINEST-uz9ek]

I don’t get the premise of this review? Your comparing a $100 watch to 8k Rolex and then highlighting differences???? It would of been better just to do a review on the on the invictica on its own.

[@nab2420]

If I remember correctly rolex sued invicta and made them add the etching on the side and the second hand. Early prodivers didn't have those elements.

[@airenesivad2975]

yep older models did not have it. I had a few early grand divers from the basic to the reserve edition. They got me hooked. My first fix so to speak.

[@anniesuarez4218]

@David Topchiev they are .... most"luxury brands are because they know the value of their goods is based largely upon snob appeal - without it Rolex Submariner would be about a $300- 500 watch

[@fountainpencollection8337]

I think the comparison is a bit unfair, you are comparing a watch that costs $100 Invicta pro diver with a watch that costs north of $10000 a Rolex Submariner. Another unfair comparison is depending on the price Rolex is at least 100 times better than Invicta?! Not definitely no, it may be several times better, i say maybe, but at least 100 times, definitely not. Another point of view from which the comparison is unfair is the fact that the Invicta pro diver is an excellent watch, especially for the price, but despite of that it is a watch for a normal person with a limited budget, but on the other hand, the Rolex Submariner is also an excellent watch , but not for the normal person with a family, with children who works or even for those with a small or even medium business, this watch is a status symbol for those with a lot of money for whom $10,000 is pocket change.

[@b.santos8804]

Great review and comparison! Thank you for doing a fair, honest review about a $78 watch that wasn't just making fun of those who would wear such a watch. I've just gotten into the world of watch collecting (I've always kind of liked watches, but never really educated myself about the various brands, movements, histories, etc. - I would just jump at whatever tickled my fancy....and which would fit in my budget) Of course, "Rolex" is a name that even non-watch people know about, in the same way that even non-car people know the name "Rolls Royce." FWIW, I inherited an (obviously) fake Rolex from my late father. I know it is fake because my father was both poor and cheap, but this imitation Oyster Perpetual Explorer actually looks decent and keeps good time. However, the very fact that it *IS* a fake kinda turns me off on it, sentimental value or not. I think if he had a "genuine" Invicta that looks as good as this Pro Diver, I'd probably enjoy it a lot more. Heck, this video has me seriously considering buying one, where I won't feel guilty about spending under a C-note.

[@marcelodietrich8674]

Check out the Invicta 1953 Ref. 31290. It's quite gorgeous - actually & honestly.

[@rcm4u2]

Yup, I just ordered my first invicta, the 31290. Looks like a 50’s sub.

[@rcm4u2]

@@bloozism me, too!!

[@marcelodietrich8674]

@@jabezhane Check out Jomashop. I believe they ship world wide.

[@kevinc1001]

Picked one up a few weeks ago. Just ordered to leather straps for it.

[@marcelodietrich8674]

@@kevinc1001 Awesome! I put a dark brown leather NATO strap on mine last night. She looks FABULOUS!

[@nickinportland]

14:21 fun fact the three dots below the crown on the, well crown, mean it has trip lock. Versus twin lock which is either a line for steel, two for white gold, one for platinum.

[@edgargee408]

I have them both and all and I must say the Invicta feels and performs superb.

[@sleeplessingc]

wow.. kewl comment.

[@mattinmalaga]

I love my Invicta, I could never afford a Rolex but I like the Submariner look, I also like the Invicta engraving on the case, I'd prefer that than a super clone, I don't wanna be a 'faker'. Furthermore, I'm not really that bothered if it falls off my wrist in the sea or gets snatched off my arm, at 90€ I'd just buy another one, at $8,200 it would be permanently locked away in my safe and probably only ever worn at home........with the plastic protection still on it!

[@SneaktheWolf]

comparing the two is like comparing a fossil with a grand seiko, its not really a fair comparison, but considering the price of the invicta pro diver, it is an amazing watch

[@lchurch0174]

I love the Invicta; I own two. Will never need to own a another Rolex. This $60 watch...that is what I paid for mine and they work/look great. The problems I have with the Rolex: Price aside; I don't like the company or their direction. Don't like you have to be on "waiting list" to buy their product, to which unless you are a person that buys many watches you will not be getting one. This forces you into secondary markets where you now are at the mercy of price gouging, counterfeits, watches that were never serviced and have worn internal parts to name a few of the issues. I agree with the criticism of the branding on the Invicta. Less is more. This will sound strange, but I actually like the "feel" of the Invicta over the Rolex. This is mainly due to the weight. The Invicta feels more heavy and solid on the wrist. However, I do agree the fit and finish and quality of course is better on the Rolex.

[@evannussbaum1863]

At my local Costco, they sell the invicta right beside the submariner. It is very funny

[@George-wv5wk]

There are Rolex on your convenience store ? Jesus...

[@evannussbaum1863]

@@George-wv5wk Costco is a discount wholesaler. They sell cars. Why not rolexes

[@1Corinthians15.1-4]

Are they selling the Rolex at a special Costco price? Lol

[@bigshott9117]

You can also buy this Invicta as a swiss made, with a sw200 or ETA 2829b movement. I would ask him to wear it for a month or two then go back to the Rolex.

[@geraldmartin9228]

Comparing a $100. Invicta to a $10.k Rolex is absurd on it's face. I've been wearing Invicta Pro Divers for over 20 years. They are excellent watches that keep perfect time, and look 98% identicle to a Rolex Submariner. Here's the real difference between them, I paid under $100. for a great watch that keeps perfect time, and put the other $9,900. towards my brand new $15k Indian Chief Vintage Motorcycle. Now I can go fast, and still tell time on a watch that people still mistake for a Rolex :)

[@LuDiamondDog]

Pretty much everything you do is a great advertisement for Invicta. You claim to be a hater, but all the positive comments you make plus the massive difference in price makes you a great salesperson for the Invicta brand. Oh, and I like how you point out the over branding just like Rolex has down with the crown on the crown (ha ha good one) as well as stamping it on the bracelet. I'm glad that bugs the shit outta you just like it does me. Good Job!!😄

[@stauguastine]

Ok, just found this searching your channel after I already commented on your Orient diver's watch review, thanks for both. For those who disagree with you on the wear of the two watches, I own the Invicta Pro Diver, it is an awesome watch and for me wears comfortable on my wrist, but here is the deal. If I came into a windfall of money and decided to buy the Rolex Submariner and it was not more comfortable than the $80 Invicta I would be soooo pissed at Rolex, I mean, let's get real. If the Rolex turned out to be much more comfortable on the wrist than my Invicta I would not be one iota upset with Invicta, again, it is an $80 watch. Great reviews and videos I am glad I found your channel.

[@numistika]

Rolex is a luxurious watch that I would wear in situations with low risk of damaging it. Invicta, serviced before hand, can be enjoyed in the water and sand, grinding it between the bracelet sections without any worry. Invicta is a real beach boy!

[@phillipstuart3318]

I have the invicta Love it Great looking watch , great quality, great price Not a sub but when I'm wealthy I'll buy a sub Don't over reach live with in your means

[@kanifuker721]

When you buy your sub, where are you going to keep it?. Have you got a big garden or own your own dock?.

[@nelsonortas4796]

I own Subs and Deep Seas, Grand Seiko's, Hublots, Seiko's, Citizens and Bulova.... AND just recently got an Invicta Divers for $78... I went surfing with it for months. 2022, it's still working

[@rockthewatch]

You know the end of the world is at hand when the the C-Virus is here, Tom Brady Goes to Tampa Bay and Jory owns and INVICTA. 🤣 Just jokes man. Great video. Would totally ROCK that Rolex.

[@TheCometHunter]

Like Jory, I feel the I-N-V-I-C-T-A engraved case wall is un-necessary and rather gauche. The branding on the bracelet clasp is also quite cheesy. I'm thinking of buying a generic fold-over clasp and installing it on the ProDiver's bracelet.

[@-THEBIGDAWG-]

I own a invicta pro diver and I can say with confidence that the pro diver is the best bang for your buck when it comes to a diver under $100

[@timsmith6683]

I have a sub and a datejust i also have several invivtas, while the invictas are great for the money the problem i have had it the crystals have gotten cloudy after 10 year. For the price ill just buy new ones and replace them. They definitely have their place

[@alexhood9438]

i like only one invicta pro diver and its the 9404 i love the color combo of a white face and red black outer ring cant wait to buy it thanks for this honest comparrison

[@davedavidh3328]

Love my Invicta 8935, wear it everyday for work, 3 years on and it still looks good.

[@demente1645]

Of course the Rolex is gonna feel smoother since you already broke it in throughout the years. Good video tho

[@henryviiifake8244]

Well... it also costs almost 100x as much, so it *better* smoke the Invicta out of the box (i.e. _before_ breaking it in).

[@ahmet2210]

Let me sum up Invicta PD -----> VW Toureg Rolex Sub -----> Bentley Benteyga

[@Sowhat300]

The originality of the INVICTA pro diver is the price. A decent watch for a decent price.

[@lincmerc1581]

I like the fact that Invicta made sure no one could mistake it for a Rolex. At least it's not a deliberate fake copy. I simply like the look of it. I like dive watches.

[@williamrizzo1285]

Wear what you like! Well said Jory

[@dompretcloud2]

Rolex and invicta should partner up like the omega moon swatch.

[@johngifford7725]

I drove a Mercedes-Benz 240D for a couple of years. Great automobile. It was a bit worn and had issues when I got it, but it did the job I needed it to do. Paid $800 for that car. $8k for a watch? I like that Invicta well enough to keep over $8k in my pocket. Obviously the Rolex is better, but it's not $8k better. That's the truth.

[@mikesmusicden]

The Invicta is an absolute tank with a Seiko movement - for under a hundred bucks. I am an ER nurse and wear this watch regularly on the job. It's been covered in bodily fluids, hit by oxygen tanks, smacked on the walls and the floor taking down psychotic patients, etc. Is it a Rolex, no. Is it worth a hundred dollars, hell yes! In my opinion, it's the best value dollar for dollar in the watch market bar none.

[@joeloverti672]

Hi Jordy... comparing a well-worn Rolex's fit and feel to an new, out-of-the-box Invicta is bit like comparing apples to oranges. Is there a $100 to $8,000 difference in fit and feel... I think not. I like your reviews and channel.

[@blackswan7568]

Really liked your conclusion here. As a Pro Diver owner myself, I appreciate the look and quality for the price (approx. 1% the price of the Rolex), but I can totally understand that the Rolex feels much nicer and more high quality. I'm be using my Invicta as my "dress watch" until I can get my Rolex😉

[@rstumbaugh43]

I’ve had my seiko kinetic for 26 years. I bought it on eBay for $215, and it’s been through everything with me, I’m a mechanic/handyman, tinkerer. During this time, I have replaced the capacitor 2X, and upgraded from mineral to thicker sapphire crystal, and a few bracelet pins. A few years ago, I got an invicta pro diver 2 tone, and got a lot of compliments, (still get compliments on my seiko too)..I keep the pro for going out, my seiko is my daily driver, but wanted to get a new workhorse, so I just got the smith and Bradley Atlantis A2 GMT, they claim it’s extremely rugged, and it’s my 1st battery watch in over 26 years…we’ll wait and see how it holds up..

[@AlexiaVon]

Looks just as good as the Rolex, but what do I know..

[@VN9001]

I have this model Invicta and am very happy with it. I enjoyed your video, thank-you for doing this! I'm not an Invicta fan boy, nor a Rolex collector. Just sharing my opinion here. I think I'm stating the obvious in that this really is not an apples to apples comparison. The Invicta is no where near in the league of the Rolex and was never intended to be. My gosh, most any individual "part" on the Rolex exceeds the entire price with tax of the Invicta. The Invicta is more fairly compared to the umpteen other knock-off Rolex Submariners out there. Your presentation was very good and I can't understand anyone being offended by your comments on the Invicta. Well done! 🙂

[@ox2115]

The invicta is simply a homage to rolex. Its amazing bang for buck, and infanct i own one myself, but to compare the craftmanship of invicta to rolex is ridiculous haha. A better comparison would be the invicta pro diver with the sturhling depthmaster with swiss movement or the cheaper regatta 792 with miyota movement. But great video non the less, i enjoyed watching.

[@zagraniczniak4120]

Thumbs down on the Submariner. Such a total knockoff of the Invicta! Rolex, if you want to release a dive watch, have a little self-respect and come up with your own design, don't copy Invicta!

[@mcwhorter141mcwhorter8]

Great comparison! I want the Invicta.

[@catdaddy57]

Love my invicta pro diver...it keeps very accurate time and has that seiko movement

[@jaykraft9523]

Have had this watch for about 6 years myself love it, extremely dependable. had some hokey (but good lookiin') Rolex fakes before, fell in love with the Submariner. this is the same idea but legit. Big thumbs up

[@vertualsurfing]

Totally Subjective (Emotional) Comment Here: My (Late) Older Brother's 70's 'Seiko Pepsi'.. I Always Saw It as 'The BEST SURFER'S Watch'.. 'Indestructible.. & Timelessly-Cool'.. (Get a Helluva' Good Strap Tho!!.).. (This is a 'Damn-Fine' Video BTW!!)..

[@xrigtrk]

I have a Invicta pro diver automatic in my collection I like it .