Wire kindly release it on more platforms in different languages. The country need to watch this.
@anand1pillai9 ай бұрын
Certainly but then there would be no country. Hearing the presenter I could well imagine the attitude of the so called Hindus over the many millennia who would give their honour and ethics away for a few pennies or praise
@HRKhan-rg1kq9 ай бұрын
@@anand1pillaiesa nhi hai na to be posted😊 3rr😊
@debayanbose99839 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤😊
@sbaskaran76383 ай бұрын
Why? Wants to distort universally? Get a balanced version . Indian History is too polarised . We have to cherry pick truths from the narratives from either side.
@VdbailАй бұрын
The Lie would be in different languages...lol. Namit Arora and his fake version..lol
@johnalexander49828 ай бұрын
Like Nehru's Discovery of India..... Bharat ek Khoj
@VdbailАй бұрын
Discovery of India is the most popular fake literature in the world....lol
@floatingrationale9 ай бұрын
Muslim rulers exempted Muslims but taxed only non-Muslims. Two of those taxes are jizya and Khara.
@floatingrationale9 ай бұрын
Sorry it was Kharaj. Given this, how did Hindu rulers of that time collected taxes? Were they at least taxed in a fair and balanced way?
@PercivalDark8 ай бұрын
This is a common confusion that Non-Muslims just don't understand. Under Islamic Law all citizens must usually pay taxes. For Muslims, the tax was called 'Zakat' and for Non-Muslims, the tax was called 'Jizyah'.
@PercivalDark8 ай бұрын
Zakat is one of the 5 pillars of Islam: 1. Iman (Faith/Belief) 2. Salat (Prayer) 3. Zakat (Tax) 4. Saum (Fasting in Ramadan) 5. Haj (Pilgrimmage)
@pranav2105912 ай бұрын
@@PercivalDark Not a muslim myself, but zakat is charity, not taxation. Please check authentic sources instead of RW propaganda.
@arunanand039 ай бұрын
Dear Namit Ji, We are grateful u bring these history episodes and presenting a very logical pictures.
@anand1pillai9 ай бұрын
There is a clear slant in his theme of presentation, almost appearing paid!
@anand1pillai9 ай бұрын
Logic may be but the partisan agenda of favouring extrinsic forces but paining the intrinsic in a poor light is obvious.
@arunjetli79092 ай бұрын
This guy is a mercenary for jihad
@morambam98979 ай бұрын
I have been watching the series enthusiastically from the beginning. I would love an episode about the Northeast in the later episodes.
@ansh_u_r9 ай бұрын
Nobody in history could ever say that Vijaynagar was an Islamic resistance kingdom...but certainly was an powerful Hindu kingdom...very different looking than an Islamic India..
@ghostridermallu18358 ай бұрын
Bribery is part of our culture😂😂😂
@abhishekmittal54409 ай бұрын
Thoroughly enjoying and loving this series....awesome!
@srinivasvaranasi16459 ай бұрын
Good to see a brutally objective history!
@kunals80229 ай бұрын
Would reserve my opinion till I see how he portrays the Invasions of the barbarians
@ShivanshThakur-sh8ub3 ай бұрын
@@kunals8022he portrays them as liberators.
@shahrukhali44659 ай бұрын
Shukriya ❤
@arpanapalle55569 ай бұрын
It's an eye opener. All they were after is power and wealth. Religion never really mattered like people of current times would like to believe. Krishna Deva Raya's period of rule is described as Golden age of Telugu literature. I guess their love for indulgence in arts and literature is what made them memorable
@criticphil9 ай бұрын
That's partially true. If Vijayanagar empire really subjugated other regions, those regions and their descendants would remember the atrocities as part of collective history.
@ssmot1139 ай бұрын
The best thing about the comment section under 'Indians' series is that it's free from rude people. If it's not because of actual comment deletion by The Wire, then it's commendable...
@ravinr95833 ай бұрын
Leftists never accept criticism. My comment would be deleted immediately.
@rohitvenkateshwaran9 ай бұрын
Agree with 50% of what has been shown here. Disagree with the rest. Caste was prevalent in Vijayanagara as it was in just about every other Hindu and Muslim kingdom in India at that time, with Brahmins forming the privileged elite. But that doesn't mean that the social system was never questioned in Vijayanagara, or that the kings of that empire never accepted meritocracy. The saint Kanakadasa (mentioned in this video) himself is a case at point. Firstly, Kanakadasaru was not a "Dalit", but Kuruba (shepherd community: they're called Dhangar in Maharashtra. The later day Holkars of Indore would hail from this community) by origin. Kurubas were considered "Shudra" as per the caste hierarchy, and not outcaste. As per Kanakadasaru's biography (that has come down to us through oral legends), his father used to be a high ranking army officer in the court of King Krishnadevaraya, which means that caste was not a barrier to merit at least in military and administrative affairs. So Kanakadasa lived a happy and prosperous childhood with his father being able to appoint Brahmin teachers to tutor him. He grew up up to become a scholar, warrior and administrator, but then various events in his life instilled a sense of renunciation in him, due to which he relinquished his administrative position in the Vijayanagara court and went on to become the Bhakti saint we know him as today. Being well lettered since childhood, Kanakadasa was always a gifted poet: in fact, those poems in which he offers his harshest critique against caste discrimination are said to belong to the "pre-renunciation" period of his life, ie when he was employed at the Vijayanagara court! Secondly, the trend of dubbing Bhakti-devotionalism as another form of Brahminism in this series of videos is inappropriate. In case of saint Kanakadasa we're discussing here, after he resigned from worldly affairs, he became a disciple of Swami Vyasatirtha, a famous Vaishnavite monk belonging to the tradition of Madhwacharya. Vyasatirtha was a Bhakti saint-poet in his own right, but was also the preceptor to King Krishnadevaraya and the high-priest of the Tirumala Tirupati temple, which made him the Rajya-guru of the Vijayanagara kingdom! Vyasatirtha was a Brahmin by origin, but he had no qualms about admitting Kanakadasa into his cloister. Coincidentally, Vyasatirtha was Guru to saint Purandaradasa (again, mentioned in this video) as well, which makes all the three saint-poets contemporaries as well as compatriots! So considering Kanakadasa's poetry as "folk" and the works of Vyasatirtha and Purandaradasa as "orthodox Brahminical" makes no sense.
@guruprasadravi3079 ай бұрын
Good explanation Rohit, I can talk about this episode, as I hail from Karnataka and have done lot of unbiased reading on history of Karnataka. I agree to most of your information here. Due to lot of inaccuracies, I went back to see Mr Arora's credentials, and nothing stands clear about his dept of knowledge in Karnataka history. I can't talk about other episodes, as I have not done Indepth reading. I feel, it will be the same with the rest of the episodes. I feel everybody is trying to break happiness and commonsense of simple, hardworking, people. Most people are not obsessed with religion or history (especially fake history) like what we see now. Most people want to have a peaceful and moral life and good family values.
@Indian-xj5ww9 ай бұрын
@rohitvenkateshwaran You say, "the trend of dubbing Bhakti-devotionalism as another form of Brahminism in this series of videos is inappropriate." Where do you see that? I think it's a gross misreading on your part. He has clearly distinguished between the two, in this and also in previous episodes. If you believe your understanding is correct, cite some quotes etc. from the episode. Of course, the two sometimes had similar effects-like pushing out the sex-positive Tantric religion-but otherwise they are rightly depicted at distinct in the series, in their origins, beliefs, and practices.
@SudeeptaChakraborty4 ай бұрын
Let's be clear. This isn't a doctoral thesis, but brief articulation of the highlights of an era in easily digestible and interest evoking form. The presenter has done a brilliant job in that respect. Coming to the two points you have raised, the second one is clearly a misreading (or mis-viewing). Namit hasn't called Bhakti as another form of Brahminism, in fact he has clearly differentiated between the two in earlier episodes and also de-hyphenated them here. Coming to your first objection I am a little perplexed. You are using an exception to counter the general view that casteism was the norm. Of course there would be a rare exception. In your comment you have said how Kanakadasa had his harshest criticism coming even while he himself was in the royal service. Unless you are calling him a liar, this is a first hand account what he saw around him, irrespective whether he himself suffered any burnt. Also Namit didn't say Kanakadasa was a dalit, but a shepherd (15:40).
@kalyanimookherji88348 ай бұрын
Please think about compiling these episodes as a book, dvd etc before they are taken down.
@fellowhuman46569 ай бұрын
Any body else gets so excited to see new episode on youtube feed!!
@b.k.choudhary64434 ай бұрын
Wonderful, vivid , comprehensive elaboration of the topic of the whole subject of mediaeval history of India. Sincere applaud to your intellectual prowess and oration skills.❤❤❤
@hsubbaiahh82334 ай бұрын
Wonderful explanation 🙏🙏🙏
@maryamsukaynah5594 ай бұрын
Thank you for setting the records of history straight
@VdbailАй бұрын
Misinformation from this video. No truth. Namit Arora ondu bolli maga. Its in Kannada. Decipher :)
@AnirimaGhosh9 ай бұрын
Amazing. I always make sure to add a comment to increase the reach. Will you please do an episode on the Bengal and East region. Thanks.
@kalyanimookherji88348 ай бұрын
Exactly - very little authentic research videos on history of bengal
@ObservantLearner9 ай бұрын
As classy as always it is👌
@MOONLIGHT-zu4ru9 ай бұрын
Well done wire...keep it up ❤
@kvishnup9 ай бұрын
Hooked to this series....very well written and directed👍
@swarnamohanty31219 ай бұрын
Excellent sir.
@vrattaluri90459 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation,👏👏
@VdbailАй бұрын
Fake analysis. First learn local language Kannada and Telugu. Check their historical reference. This video is 100% nonsense.
@ranganathanv53659 ай бұрын
well done and please continue with more such
@ragup2059 ай бұрын
Amazing narration as always ❤🎉
@ArjunAchyutha9 ай бұрын
Amazed by this new series on Indian history!!!...lovenit❤❤❤
@vishaalbhatnagar39249 ай бұрын
Great insights, as always.
@khursheedahmed70959 ай бұрын
Fascinating history.... I am always anxiously waiting for the next episode. Thanks for all the work that goes into making this series. Very enlightening, at a time when history is being distorted.
@vkravikumar26289 ай бұрын
Really enjoyed
@shrav10127 ай бұрын
Fantastic episode. Read Rushdie's Victory City recently and this is all the more interesting right now..
@ansh_u_r9 ай бұрын
15:37 there is not only one lower caste poet, you can find many lower caste poets of the era who gives glimpses of their social lives..many in marathi... as marathi was also the language in Vijaynagar Empire...the read the writings of Chokha Mela...he gives the best descriptions of Lower caste people lives in central deccan..
@notherepim8 ай бұрын
Great work. Please never stop telling facts.
@shiladityabikashsingh64579 ай бұрын
Excellently explained and documented...Thanks WIRE
@veerindia53599 ай бұрын
Intresting history telling ways ty sir👍
@mohitanand18449 ай бұрын
They failed to innovate when they needed it the most
@rkvishwakarma44599 ай бұрын
A Good job done
@AdvKapatkarS9 ай бұрын
Thanks Again as Always
@ashok7559 ай бұрын
Good lecture. Thanks
@angelboy29019 ай бұрын
amazing history of South India
@aks12709 ай бұрын
I have thoroughly enjoyed all the episodes and looking forward to the next ones. A suggestion , if these can be edited a bit to make it suitable for high-school students and published separately as such.Also if you can publish it in major Indian languages with some good voice over artist/ scholar. Most of the schools lack good history teachers and history books are boring. Your videos can be of immense help.
@atompf249 ай бұрын
Excellent!
@NRIWelfareForum9 ай бұрын
Very nice series
@bababijli51409 ай бұрын
Presentation of Mr.Arora is superb. The whole thing when finished should be brought out as one volume as a presentation to hear and as a full book to read and ponder over. Congratulations the Wire and Mr. Arora
@prathvirajsinghpatel99187 ай бұрын
5:08 thank you ANAM SHEIKH JI for your such a secular video editing 😅😅😅
@subhendudey66259 ай бұрын
Vijaynagara empire always fascinated me. Having vivid account of the past empire through this narration is very interesting informative and refreshing. So many misconceptions cleared and made transparent the whole idea of imaginary conceptions.
@VdbailАй бұрын
Fake analysis. First learn local language Kannada and Telugu. Check their historical reference. This video is 100% nonsense.
@azimshaikh87729 ай бұрын
I eagerly wait for your episode of Indians, an excellent factual account of our history
@sagirahmed16019 ай бұрын
Very informative! I wish to see an episode on Northeast India also.
@pudur_artspudur_arts6249 ай бұрын
It felt like reading a history book authored by a scholar named "UNBIASED" . Netflix worthy materials. Let it come....
@vrattaluri90459 ай бұрын
Excellent visuals . Thank you sir
@mrajrajan9 ай бұрын
Great compilation. The negative impact this kingdom created on Tamil lands is significant right from imposing Brahminic vedas in Tamil temples and sanskritisation of temple practices which Tamil kings resisted till last Pandiyas. They were more invasive, had bitter fight with Sambovarayars of Tamil northern borders. Its the weakening of Cholas let them in and rule Madurai for sometime. In fact, they have created all irreversible damages than any muslim kingdoms at least from Tamil Nadu perspective.
@drodro76729 ай бұрын
As like this video, which intends to show how modern passions are distorting factual history and creating our biased dominant historical lectures, Tamil Nadu needs urgently to understand it. The "Tamil archanai" religion that Muthuvel Karunanidhi clan advocates for is no less the same as how North Indian Hindi speaking Hindutva thinkers deal with their Persianate past. The difference is that the subject of irrational hate here is Sanskrit and Brahminical Culture and Religion, targeted by Telugu speaking or issued leaders ! Pandyas never opposed the Sanskritisation of the Tamil society. In truth, we can even suspect the source of Sanskritisation process down South, with the contemporaneous rise of the "Muvendar" dynasties (Cheras, Cholas and Pandyas), who along the Tamil language and culture (before them, Tamil must have been a less spread and less dominant language than it is now), flourished or colonised tanks to them. The Muvendar seeking a religious legitimacy through their numerous Brahmadeyas and conformism to a kind of religious taught. Brahmins, who, by the way, were already well present in the Tamil society of the early sangam eras. Indo-Aryan language influence can also have been more significant than it is now, through Jainism (Ardamagadhi and Sauraseni reading and praying Samanar) and even Buddhism (Pali). Of the seven Saptapuri or holy cities of Brahmanism, the sole one in Southern India (Aryan Maharashtra and Goa, and Sanskritophile Andhra included) is Kanchipuram. Why ? Maybe the Vijayanagara legacy in Madurai can be irritating for some people now, notably due to the Polygar system and its consequences. But a little North, in the Thanjavur region, Nayaka (and their succeeding Marathas) contribution was huge and still influential positively.
@abdulmajeedkadambot72127 ай бұрын
Good to see history with a different and factual perspective. To complete Indians -A brief History of ......, you need to also cover the histories of further South - 'Tamilakam' and its various periods. Different Sangan eras. Please do your research and bring out the history of this important and different region.
@MirAli-o4s9 ай бұрын
An excellent presentation based on research.A very valuable contribution for those who wants to rise above their prejudices and gain an insight about the actual facts recorded in India's history.Congratilations to all the team members who contributed in this presentation.Please keep up the good work.
@VdbailАй бұрын
What research? Hahhaha Does he know the local language Kannada or Telugu? Fake video...lol
@MirAli-o4sАй бұрын
@@Vdbail you better ask the Vloggers about the languages you are interested in! We are only concerned with the contents of the presentation.A very researched and historical Vlog indeed! Not for the biased people of course!
@VdbailАй бұрын
@@MirAli-o4s : Hope you can understand English. I am saying the research is faulty and biased. Vijayanagara Empire was in Karnataka and AP. The language spoken is Kannada and Telugu. There is a lot of literature from that time. Its obviously in the local language of Kannada and Telugu. His accounts on Sati and the way Women were treated is not found in any of them. This is based on so called foreigners account. How true can that be. The foreigners of that time would have written in Pali or Prussian language. The Author is not familiar with those languages either. So its a fake and incorrect video. Some people who hate Indian culture obviously will find it historical and useful. Get cured.
@VdbailАй бұрын
@@MirAli-o4s : How readily you are accepting it as the Truth. On which basis? Non native fellows narrative is considered the truth. Biased people and their fake historical narrative....lol Get cured!
@ziaurda9 ай бұрын
So fascinating.. ❤
@adeshshingare11599 ай бұрын
Mr. ARORA first of all thanks you lot for bringing this amazing series , I watched all the episodes of this series they are very fascinating and enjoyable thanks to your lucid presentation...I want to make demand for some more episodes on Chola empire, sangam age, Delhi sultanate, and Temples Architecture. ❤
@malvindersingh68289 ай бұрын
Fabulous series. Thank you Mr. Arora. Much needed in today’s day and age.
@ranasyed32059 ай бұрын
Thanks for your hard work sir Very good analysis
@kaushalgagan67239 ай бұрын
Please release it in Hindi too. It will help many. Waiting for the next episode ❤
@SCIENCEPARADISE6 ай бұрын
Sir please make 2nd part of foreign travellers
@mayabava5 ай бұрын
why did not talk about Cheras, Cholas and Pandya Kings who were more powerful than many kings in the world?
@mw31759 ай бұрын
high respect for this report
@EustaquioSantimano9 ай бұрын
Thank you for this enthralling series on the History of India. Very informative, educational, insightful !! The series should reach a wider audience.
@harbrindersingh21709 ай бұрын
Always waiting for next episode
@AsadKhan-ii3es9 ай бұрын
Excellent....
@knowledgejunction81939 ай бұрын
What is stopping wire to do this Series in Hindi Language if they want to change the mind of Indian Hindus then it should be in Hindi Language as well,I request them to run this series in both English and Hindi Language...!!!👍
@Adyjetu5 ай бұрын
Hakka raya and bukka raya were kannada feudal commanders of Telugu Kakatiyas kings
@vchandra3721Ай бұрын
At 5:42, both the voice-over and text say " Anjeyanadri" instead of " Anjaneyadri". Hanuman is son of Anjani, hence Anjaneya, and the hill associated with him is Anjaneyadri.
@sayantimitra65149 ай бұрын
👍👍👍 for each and every segment
@umaghargi47659 ай бұрын
We Kannadigas are very proud of Vijaya Nagar empire & great king Krishna Devaraya. Such a prosperous empire which was bigger & wealthier than Rome. Even the foreign travellers were amazed by it's grandeur. When , talking about Devadasi culture, it was in practice every where in Indian culture & cannot be attributed to Vijaya Nagar only. And the practice of King's wanting to possess the beautiful women is also common for all kings, & for muslim rulers. This should not be shown as negative points of the great Kingdom. Even, Upper class & lower class residing at separate parts of the city can be seen even back in Indus valley civilization & Roman Civilization. But , accepting Muslims as soldiers in the army , trusting them ,vwas a blunder done by Ramaraya, the last King of Vijaya Nagar. Though, hindu soldiers warned against making a muslim the chief commander of the army, Ramaraya ignored it. But the Muslim chief, betrayed him & joined with Bahamani Sultan & other muslim soldiers in the army joined him. This was the cause of defeat of Ramaraya.
@robinsingh40274 ай бұрын
this episode open the Pandora's box of lies and shame for both north and south Indians....yeh to dhoti khol raha hai sabki :P
@Advaitvaadi9 ай бұрын
Great informative episode
@TheAbsurd_Man9 ай бұрын
Very informative series👍
@devidaughter77829 ай бұрын
when you speak about the empire with the less strong economic base being more warlike, I wonder if this is a pattern that can be generalized? would it be fair to say that economically more stable and prosperous 'kingdoms' have been (generally) less warlike? if so, this certainly could explain the invaders from central Asia (without a strong economic base?) coming into the stable, prosperous IVC.
@debdeepmajumder91367 ай бұрын
Fantastic work... Loved it.
@ranasyed32059 ай бұрын
Wonderful series
@anandprasadsharma50679 ай бұрын
Please upload next episode its very interesting series
@Mr3036069099 ай бұрын
Thank you for clear growth mindset brief on south Indian history.
@neenathapainstitutions54999 ай бұрын
Really enjoying this series.. Have also shared it! Thank you Sir! 😊
@kajakaiser9 ай бұрын
Thanks
@Mryajurarora9 ай бұрын
Wonderful series. Looking forward to the next episode.
@kabiruzzaman51299 ай бұрын
🕊️
@narendrababu89999 ай бұрын
I am waiting for next episode
@DSMEOMARFAROOQ9 ай бұрын
Sir, You could have used some more accounts of information from the russian traveller Afanasy Nikintin
@rgedz61489 ай бұрын
Thank you sir..
@subrahmanyamgudipati2689 ай бұрын
Good knowledge
@anandmohan46579 ай бұрын
Thanks for analysis
@DrKamranIqbal9 ай бұрын
History well told in a balanced realism, a nuance generally missing. Love from Pakistan.
@ileenollukaren62449 ай бұрын
Thanks Namit sir i love the way you narrate. Awesome work, fantastic research.
@fredindie9 ай бұрын
Wonderful insight, love this series!
@ManjunathRagupathi8 ай бұрын
Supar
@veed858 ай бұрын
Loved the whole series, great research and presentation, Bohat zabardast Namit Sahib, Samandar ko qoozay mai band kardia apnay!!
@whiteycat6159 ай бұрын
Brilliant series so far
@chitrarajgopal45975 ай бұрын
Life in the last was more cruel an unfair than present times
@AdityaChaudhary-oo7pr9 ай бұрын
Very exceptional series
@ShrekCunther9 ай бұрын
I don't know why I get through this torture of seeing the wire vedio every time it's posted, the italian guy says no one knew how vijaynagar queens lived , immediately proceeds with women were persecuted ree..... what is Madhura Vijayam then ? Gangamba Devi not a poet how is she describing muslmans in that book ?
@rajivchawdhry48719 ай бұрын
How to see earlier episodes?
@mdimtiyaz-zl5gp9 ай бұрын
Such a nicely done series .. This will go in history as reference material...great work.
@pratheekrebello83199 ай бұрын
While I love this series, I’m curious to know why we rely so much on testimonies of travellers and foreigners. What do Indian sources say about these empires? Do their accounts agree with the foreign sources
@DesiBhoy9 ай бұрын
Historians use a variety of sources that complement and support each other in creating the portrait of a society. Travellers are a valuable source because they tend to record things that natives often take for granted and don’t comment on. They bring fresh ways of seeing and an eye for cultural differences. But it’s also true that travellers can often be unreliable or misinformed or prone to exaggeration. So this has to be corrected for with other sources, including literary texts, court and trade records, inscriptions, archaeology, textual analysis, and of course other travellers’ testimonies. At times, multiple sources might confirm a detail; at other times, a detail only from a traveller is deemed reasonable to accept. It depends.
@xr559 ай бұрын
Testimonies of foreigners or travellers are unbiased. Also, the lower caste wasn't educated. @@DesiBhoy
@bharathnaby9 ай бұрын
Excellent analysis. Thanks for the beautiful video essay, keep continuing this great work.