They cost HOW MUCH? Gilly & Howie dive deep into the lavish technology of Test stumps! | Fox Cricket

[@superman-zr9ei]

The difference between Indian broadcasting and Australian broadcasting is huge. Thoroughly enjoyed this.

[@aerofxunme]

Indian broadcasting is basically a lot of chest thumping about Indian players and lacks any form of neutral reporting it's better to keep your device on mute and watch cricket when 2 Indian commentators are on the panel.

[@MrDrgdf]

Indians like you lack in cricketing knowledge (even basic things) All they know is how to boast about ipl, bcci money.

[@AbhishekDurai]

And ADs

[@xcel5203]

Modi is a great commentator .

[@kakun63]

😂 so kuch modi ask ir mom who is ur dad , my god modi haters are so fruststed ​@@xcel5203

[@barbell_lifter]

The game's in the balance, love Gilly's puns 🤣

[@darshanchavan7352]

but Howie clearly does not.

[@ajaysrailzoneofficial]

Great Broadcast From FOX CRICKET❤❤

[@priyansupanda1014]

This is some quality broadcasting from fox cricket. Woah, so much information with great presentation, camera work. Fabulous✨. Sky Sports and fox cricket are keeping the level high of broadcasting. Hope indian broadcaster can do 50% of this content.

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

What's so great about this? Do explain.😂

[@ankursaxena2354]

They invest in far greater things. An example - Akaash Chopra

[@flamingfrancis]

Ravi is not amused!!!

[@ambalavanant]

One stump costs 30 grand 🤯 That certainly stumped me!

[@elcordobes-i1h]

it bowled me over

[@darksouls6014]

So 180k dollars for 6 stumps. 3 for both side. possibly 200k with the bails.

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

And they probably have spare ones too😂

[@xcel5203]

The great heist - if you can make off with all 6 .

[@Soldiersmart]

Bro the total three stumps cost 30000

[@danielmathew7768]

I think i need to have a start up that makes stumps at half that price... And i can rule this industry.

[@zchettaz]

Was thinking the same thing. Even with the latest tech, I couldn't see it costing anymore than 5k to produce, at most.

[@2burning2turning]

@@zchettazthreats because you have absolutely no idea

[@zchettaz]

@@2burning2turning Oh?!.. Go on then, explain how it would cost more?

[@jakelynch7389]

@@zchettazso few units are sold, obviously. Which means a huge chunk of that price will be in the man hours to develop them so while the raw materials are maybe 5k that doesn’t include development

[@dineshbeniwal9613]

There is no industry and that's the problem, volume is small hence high price

[@MIK-NEST]

These guys are authentic and professional which Asian sport channels lack. Sadly

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

What? Why? Cause they're white?😂

[@flamingfrancis]

You can bet they would hold more interest in some of those nations if there was a betting market on which bail weighed the most,

[@danielm173]

@@Xinnie_The_Flubcci doesn’t even have a KZbin channel, and most of the info comes from foreign channels

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

@@danielm173 wanna guess why? It's because cricket is like gold in India, it's like a Netflix, Amazon prime type thing. You're not even gonna find the footage of a major match on KZbin that easily let alone a full mid innings TV show if you're expecting this kind of presentation. Some countries may find this extremely greedy of BCCI but, that's what happens, do you think if cricket was a big business in Australia or England their boards wouldn't wanna milk it? Even if I'm an Indian and I may not like BCCI's cheap ass tactics I still understand where they're coming from. Money rules everything. You're not gonna watch game of thrones on KZbin are you?😂 As for this video, I remember watching a detailed breakdown of these stumps in the mid innings break of an IPL match, I remember very distinctly because I remember them calling these 'jingle bails' which sounded cool but made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

[@CricNerd7]

Fox sports paramount of cricket broadcasting

[@pushkargodkar9183]

Fox Cricket has gone to the next level when it comes to technology in Cricket.

[@michaelcooper4986]

Even fox sports in the states has some incredible gizmos when it comes to there coverage of NFL and nascar

[@rockyb1581]

Channel 9 was better,hadmore professionals

[@pushkargodkar9183]

I said about Technology. Channel9 commentary was top notch.

[@NeillyWheelie]

In my opinion, if a team is unsuccessful in reviewing a caught behind because it has hit the stumps and the bails haven't fallen off, they should keep the review...

[@lollycopter]

It's up to the players to pay attention and watch where the ball goes.

[@LewisBlue345]

@@lollycopter Come on man it’s hard to think that a which sounds like the ball nicking that bat is actually nicking the stumps. I agree with Neilly

[@lollycopter]

@@LewisBlue345 Welcome to sport.

[@leeturton9254]

If this west indies team beat this Australian team and at the gabba! then surely it's got to go down as one of the biggest shocks of the last 20 years....but either way this should give the whole of west indies cricket a massive wake up call .. they can come back we all want to see them back we want their fans back in the grounds especially!... cricket is better if we have a good solid west indies team

[@ADGNet]

Best they can hope for is a draw. If Aus started batting on Day 5 then it'd be interesting but a day 4 pitch will handle 200 runs from a team..

[@sparshsharma5270]

​@@ADGNet Draw isn’t possible at the moment. Result is imminent. 6 full sessions left and 156 runs required vs 8 wickets.

[@GbrBy]

Unfortunately SEQ has been pummelled by rain all morning so far

[@GbrBy]

Unfortunately SEQ has been pummelled by rain all morning so far

[@GbrBy]

Unfortunately SEQ has been pummelled by rain all morning so far

[@Chethan1310]

LOVE FOX CRICKET AND CRICKET AUSTRALIA FOR SHOWING THESE THINGS

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

It's already been shown enough in IPL.😂

[@flamingfrancis]

Attracts more interest given the Zinger bails are an Australian invention.

[@drcoolx]

Star sports could never

[@iHazf]

They'd randomly start talking about Virat Kohli in the middle of each sentence so yeah, they could never.

[@Dheeraj71192]

So true 😂​@@iHazf

[@cross1928]

​@@iHazfaccurate

[@rishabh5343]

😂😂 ​@@iHazf so true....

[@rishabhtonde4506]

​@@iHazfonly in hindi commentary 😂😂😂not English.. Agar hindi me gautam gambhir & ravi shaastri ko rakhe to acha hoga

[@gouravkumarsingh7482]

Exactly, now there is more of a reason to take the stumps when anyone wins. Take the stumps as a bonus lol, now this is how you keep the tea break entertaining. Damn good work

[@hishaam3786]

Fox Cricket is best broadcasting channel unlike star sports they discuss everything from technology to performance of opponents

[@rishabh5343]

Jht just star sports... JIO is even worst then it. The discussion in west is so so good. We can never. Never match match it. Both in aus and eng is so enriching

[@hishaam3786]

@@rishabh5343 of course even in South Africa and New Zealand they do lot of discussion but not in sub continent especially India

[@jeganstarkhere]

Gilchrist was right; Offstump was little bit lower in the ground, hence the bail got spun.

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Only by a millimetre. Would have still been spun either way.

[@jenconvertibles]

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508a millimetre makes more of a difference than you’d think

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Still no chance of the bail tumbling. @@jenconvertibles

[@jenconvertibles]

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 you may be right but i wouldnt be 100% sure

[@flamingfrancis]

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 Correct and clearly demonstrated in an example here where properly set stumps and bails produce spinning bail that remains in the ferrule.

[@jadonsancho25]

Quality stuff boys!

[@akshaysonawale3150]

I think with that sort of weight and being spinning on stump,it's better to replace those lighting stumps to our traditional wooden stumps.

[@lollycopter]

It's interesting that while the MCC Laws of Cricket don't specify that the bails have to be a certain weight, they do state that both the stumps and bails "shall be" wooden. I guess additional tournament rules (including those dictated by viewership and money) therefore overrule that. Either way, both sides play with the same set of rules so luck is going to go both ways as we saw from the archival footage at the start.

[@NN-xn2jb]

awesome video by Fox

[@RealEspaerVision]

Foz camera quality is great

[@xcel5203]

If it hits the stumps the stumps should light up and yell "out" very loud and clear - that's technology working for you . One review saved for the team and the umpire .

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Confusing as hell in a close run out situation though. The stumps can't tell if the batter made his crease or not.

[@xcel5203]

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 run-out and stump-out uses camera.

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Exactly - which means having a stump scream "out!" every time it's hit simply cannot work. @@xcel5203

[@antonyraj_29]

Why in india it wasn't telecasted. They just skip this and telecast some old highlights during session breaks. But this kind of analysis and talk show are 💎. To be honest i keep switching to aus vs wi test match while watching ind vs eng only for the quality of Australia broadcast. Their indepth analysis and humor sense of kerry is ❤. Especially the combination of isha guha and kerry 😂 always 😂

[@njas8303]

not many subscribers in india for cricket knowledge , though there are millions / crores of viewers 😂

[@Shorts-or1ln]

Extra pay

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

Oh look at that, an Indian fascinated by white guys talking.😂 What else is new.🤣

[@mrgyani]

Maybe they should allow balls that are just a few cms to the leg side. Sometimes they give not out if the ball is millimeters to leg side.

[@manojkumars9883]

Why the video looks wierdly blurred to show potrait mode? bail spinning 360... New surprises in cricket!

[@ajaysrailzoneofficial]

Great Broadcast From FOX CRICKET❤❤

[@Billoushukla]

For the zingers you got to keep like if it is flash, that means person is out that’s why you keep zinger

[@bilalshafi5619]

Test matches should be played with original wooden stumps and bails to keep the beauty and aesthetics of cricket.

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

And day tests are (with the exception of the stump camera). These plastic stumps are typically used in day-night (pink ball) tests

[@coloursoftherainbow8399]

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 What is the use of them in day night test though? Can't they just see when the bail falls off it would be apparent.

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

It primarily because it looks spectacular (in much the same way that fireworks are more effective at night. It's treated as a kind of in-game pyrotechnic in a way.@@coloursoftherainbow8399

[@lollycopter]

@@coloursoftherainbow8399 It looks better at night for the ground spectators and non-traditional TV audiences.

[@martinmarshall9442]

So the rule is bail off rather than hit the stumps? I'm Scottish, don't know all the rules but love test cricket.

[@soulsphere9242]

Correct, the bail has to come out of the groove and stay out.

[@petert3355]

I think the wording is "to break the stumps". That means bails and stumps cannot be in contact with each other.

[@flamingfrancis]

The Laws of Cricket were / are compiled by the MCC housed at the Home of Cricket. Can be sourced at their web site and look under Law 29.1

[@daksh2953]

What a presentation

[@d_k_pawar]

I wish Star sports brings this level of content. Loved it. Kudos to Fox cricket ❤

[@flamingfrancis]

Fox cannot take all the credit for this type of coverage. Real scientific coverage and insight began in the 70's when World Series Cricket revolutionised coverage of the game

[@durgapampana1642]

Jio telecasting been like seeing 90's Matches

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

Why?😂

[@kaustubhh8466]

Arshdeep Singh broke 2 in 2 balls in IPL 2023

[@Yashcky_]

😂

[@FORG14]

Good work by Fox

[@lukose2007]

Good coverage . 13,000 AUD is expensive .

[@tanvirchaudhary3401]

So many time I saw like this ball kis the bail but bail didn't remove for bowler very painful.

[@GaneshKumar-fv2cg]

With the light blinking bails, why cant we change the rule book quickly such thaf bails need not fall down to declare out

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Then the rules become fundamentally different if those stumps are used compared to if the wooden ones are.

[@DhruveelDave]

In IPL 23, Arshdeep Singh broke two of those in one match, same over, on two consecutive identical deliveries. Costliest over in the IPL history, lol.

[@daniyalahmed8808]

Why is ICC wasting so much money on something that is actively making the sport unfair?

[@gpet23]

Key abbreviation, ICC

[@TurkeyMuncher117]

I think the heavier bails are better. It prevents them being blown off by the wind, and if you aren't hitting the stumps hard enough to remove something that weighs less than 30g then you don't deserve the wicket

[@utha2665]

@@TurkeyMuncher117 And they showed that the traditional bails still don't dislodge under certain circumstances, but it's easier to tell when the new ones have dislodged. I'm sure as technology improves they can reduce the weight, but it would be interesting to see how much the stumps weigh with the cameras in them.

[@GbrBy]

TBF this is because the game goes into the night. If it was a normal day only game wooden bails/stumps would be used instead

[@gpet23]

@@GbrBy timber stumps and a can of fluro spray paint, job done. $12 in total

[@familyplans3788]

several things that spring to mind , i would be interested to see the weight of 'heavy ' bails , the ones they use in high winds the bails are the same for both sides so their weight doesnt matter is it just me or does this look like a pc game ? where the crowd is out of focus but the immediate foreground is in focus And finally , can we take a minute to applaude that poor sound guy who spends all game on a slider between balls , and you thought your job was boring

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

That's just how TV cameras work...

[@lollycopter]

That style of focus is called bokeh. It makes the foreground pop more. It's just an old filmmaking/photography technique that sports broadcasters have only started to make use of more recently. The NFL is another example. Search for the video "That beautiful football shot isn't 8k" by CleoAbram.

[@varghesethomas]

Sumps and Bails cost on the ground 200K!

[@sainaveenbali]

how is lbw dismissal more lethal than clean bowled with bails not dislodged

[@narendrapanse7844]

👍Worthy successors to Tony Greig.

[@pradeeppillai6320]

Stumps can be given as MOM & MOS so costly😅😅😅

[@shreeveda]

Sadly, Cricket has become more batter-friendly these days. Rules must change here to say the batter is out even if the ball kisses any stump or bail, even if a bail is not dislodged.

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

That CANNOT happen.

[@zishxn]

The answer is $30,000

[@maxscameraguy]

This is so cool

[@rezwan9329]

Adam is hilarious 😅

[@alikhan2107]

When the wickets are umpires call

[@deepknk3581]

That one stump cost worth 2 years salary

[@TranceEventsUK]

I refuse to believe that 1 stump costs 30 grand, for plastic stumps with lights in them.

[@Hamza16561]

Is it 30,000 USD or AUD?

[@fly463]

Aud obv

[@avishkalaxapana]

wow great

[@ericcartmansh]

Damn, 30k AUD is a lot of money!

[@flamingfrancis]

While it probably would not have mde a lot of difference here this is not the accepted method of weighing to the Standard on any electronic balance and certainly not on an analytical balance.

[@billyburroo]

so now if there's a review and the ball is hitting the bails its not out

[@aayushnarayanofficial]

I wish Indian broadcasting was this good. It is just Politics and star worship.

[@2inthepink1inthestink11]

Gilly calling going to watch cricket all day with a couple hours commentary work lol tough working life. slave to the man poor Gilly

[@adityasarang5755]

Why can't we just give it out if the ball hits the stumps. That's an easier and cheaper change to make than all this needless technology where it doesn't matter.

[@dharankur81]

This is absurd ICC rule ..when we are using technology like ultra edge to establish a slightest touch .. we are overruling a clear bold because physics was playing spoil sport and bail didn’t come off. What’s the logic of not giving out if ball has touched the stumps / bails but bails didn’t come off. It’s understandable in past due to lack of technology bails coming off was used as a visual cue that ball has hit / touched the stumps , but should not be a limitation in today’s world .

[@shreeveda]

But for that the bail rule needs to change. Rule says: Bail needs to be dislodged from the stump if it's to be given out , not just shaken.

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

Some cheap aristocratic pommie made the rule.😂

[@flamingfrancis]

It is not an ICC Rule....it is a Law of Cricket (29.1) and those Laws come under the auspices of the MCC, Marylebone Cricket Club. The ICC determines the Rules for events and tournaments. But still agree the Laws have not kept up with technology. An even more stupid situation is the one that uses ball tracking (which is artificial) to say a batter is not out when clearly the tracking shows just under 50% of the ball would have hit the stumps. We coach kids to bowl at the stumps and yet have this mindless outcome.

[@Abhinaba2207]

Soooo insightful and interesting! And over there a man who has never held a bat or ball, ever, commenting, switch hit should get banned from cricket!

[@SAHIL-fl2eo]

If same stumps and bails are used for both teams then there is no advantage to anyone.

[@lavish_nagar_45]

Hello my name is Lavish. 😂😂😂

[@Eaglefeather.Ralph07]

Bro Delhi se hai kya

[@durgapampana1642]

Bcci what are u doing with ur money Plastic chairs No hd cameras No hot spot Always depends on aus,eng to invent new things gor betterment of the game!

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

Have you looked at IPL?😂

[@shamlanmalik1170]

This Mark Howard chap not letting Gilly finish is so unprofessional. Gilly comes up with some thought and he cuts him off before he is done.

[@rajeshperumal8753]

Exactly.

[@Rikka_V1]

It was tea break which barely lasts 20 min, they didn't had much time.

[@shamlanmalik1170]

@@Rikka_V1 He was nearly done with the sentence, but he kept cutting him off. Examples for you, 00:29 00:34 00:58 1:55

[@rajeshperumal8753]

@@Rikka_V1 That would make sense if Mark was also succint but he was just blabbering.

[@dagfinissocool]

typical tv guy while Gilchrist is just having a fun day

[@stephangermishuizen1113]

so basically it was stumo tampering fom groundsman.cary shouldve been out

[@flamingfrancis]

Bairstow agrees !!

[@stupidcanvas]

I dont think a team gets 30K to win a match

[@shazzthedon]

Winning team gets to keep the stumps

[@memesonmars3157]

​@@shazzthedonNot nowadays man That were the early days..

[@jenconvertibles]

@@memesonmars3157they do still often let the man of the match take a stump at the end. warner took one at his last test at the scg and shamarr joseph i think took one this test

[@flamingfrancis]

@@jenconvertibles you will often find that, on special occasions, those stumps are cut precisely down the middle and signed on that face by all team members, sometimes the opposition too.

[@stupidcanvas]

@@jenconvertibles But do the stump cameras still work without other control equipment?

[@katzzzzz668]

BCCI with all that money do nothing

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

How does this video suddenly become all about BCCI? 😂 Coconuts really piss me off.

[@vandanpatel3395]

BCCI might be the richest board, but never in their lifetime they would be able to produce gold like this. Thank you, Gillie & Howie.

[@gustaaf1892]

Change the rules to a batter being out when the ball hits a stump or bail when bowled in first class cricket. That can be reviewed the same way a snick off the bat can be reviewed. It shouldn't have to come down to dumb luck.

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Most first class cricket is NOT televised. And that makes the rules fundamentally different in professional cricket.

[@elcordobes-i1h]

then what's the point of the bail ? When the bail falls, it's an indicator that the stump has been hit with sufficient force

[@gustaaf1892]

@@elcordobes-i1h It is about hitting the stumps and the bails being dislodged are supposed to make it clear that has occurred. Sufficient force has nothing to do with it. We now have technology that potentially could make the bails redundant, but only at first class level.

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Given that the lighting system relies on the bails, they're still necessary. What causes the stumps to light up is the breaking of an electric circuit - essentially it's sensing the loss of contact with the bails that causes stumps to light up. @@gustaaf1892

[@elcordobes-i1h]

@@gustaaf1892 It's about dislodging the bails. If the ball hits the stumps without dislodging the bails, then chalk it up as one of the ' glorious uncertainties of the game '. We cannot have excessive reviews using tech. Bails have to be used, remember the Ashes were created from a bail - so the story goes.

[@dfb1976]

I think it should be out if ball hits the stumps - just use the third umpire, it’s crazy the zinger bails are 3 times the weight of 5:35 wooden bails. 5:35. Maybe the ball shud have 3 times the normal seam. The batsmen have just too much protection like pampered kids.

[@musabali8454]

but why the hell do they cost 30 grands???

[@mehtaank1]

Hopefully with new technology Australian cheating and unsportman like conduct will reduce.

[@stupidcanvas]

It's already a batsmen's game. And they are using heavier bails that refuse to leave the grooves.

[@flamingfrancis]

A pet hate of mine too, not to mention the boundries are much smaller than when the thinner bats were used. Today's batters have everything going for them. Balls are still required to be manufactured to the same old Standards.

[@stupidcanvas]

@@flamingfrancis I guess the game is altered to serve the needs of the consumers and I guess people enjoy 4s and 6s more than wickets. There are only 10 wickets a game for a fan but 4s and 6s can be almost endless.

[@physics77guy]

30 grand not correct, its not 30grand worth of stuff in it.. probably 30 grand for the set of 6

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

They'd have a lot more than 6 if they have to rotate them each session for charging. That said, middle stump would be a lot more expensive than the outside two due to the cameras.

[@HariKishan-dl8sn]

Damm 30 k😶😶😶

[@Yashcky_]

30 k a stump 😅

[@raghavendrap6221]

I came to see gilly not the crazy stumps

[@gpet23]

So much financial heartache going around and a fucking stump costs 30k. Elitism at its finest.

[@shazzthedon]

Who are the elite in this scenario

[@gpet23]

@@shazzthedon most probably the fat greedy long lunch takers called the ICC

[@flamingfrancis]

Why single out the poor stump when many players and officials are making absolute millions....and then there's the bookmakers.

[@gpet23]

@@shazzthedon society

[@rn2505]

Stumps cost 30k, ok. How much do the bails cost ?? $30 ??

[@zzzaaalll]

Icc - Thats how we want to waste money. 😂

[@DJ.LakeSea]

Thanks to technology, we the spectators get to hear and see everything. Meanwhile, players are getting ripped off when they bowl a ball that once upon a time would have sent the bails flying. Get rid of this crap and bring back wooden bails!

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

That would NEVER have sent the bails flying.

[@DJ.LakeSea]

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 I was exaggerating.... do you work for the people who import or design those crappy new-age stumps and bails? Why are you defending something that is making the game worse?

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

You think that statement either defended or criticised them? My god your reading comprehension skills are terrible!@@DJ.LakeSea

[@DJ.LakeSea]

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 ouch!!! Book me into the burn ward lol.... meanwhile I'll phone a whambulance for you haha

[@OwaisLone]

Why do bails exist in Cricket? Only reason was to let the umpire know that the wickets have been hit. It was just a primitive technology used in Cricket to figure out if the ball hit the wickets or not. Today we have modern tech that detects the slightest of nicks. There is no reason for umpires to not give players out if the wicket obviously hits the wickets but the bails don't come off. Remember the objective is not hit the wickets with a certain amount of force. It is just to hit/touch the wickets. ICC needs to rethink the logic behind this. IMO if the Umpire clearly sees the wickets get hit but bails don't come off, they should be allowed to give the player out. Bowling team should be allowed to review it and get video evidence that the ball hit the wickets. If the ball indeed his the wickets, it means the batter was completely beaten and the bowler obviously won the battle. No reason to discount all that just because the force or angle wasn't good enough to knock the bails off. Go back to the drawing board ICC.

[@Crickster83]

Not all matches r televised..so how will technology help in such a situation...to keep the rules constant...this is the best option...bails stay...batsman stays...

[@thiruvetti]

wow what a silly design for a good invention. Those are smooth and shiny and would keep spinning over the grooves in the stump and no wonder would be hard to dislodge. at 27 its not light so might aswell have made the 2 sides of the bails using rough material so that they get dislodged with friction Such stupid design can ruin the result of a hard fought match

[@daveross1638]

Gilly had to grab the scales because his coke dealer was about to rock up...I wonder how andrew johns is doing

[@MrJJuK]

this is proof you shouldn't be given out LBW now ;)

[@rowdyshearer1900]

30k bullshit. you can buy a tesla for that.

[@Demolego1980]

No wonder Kohli always takes a stump

[@sahilkumarsingh05]

star sports should learn something

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

What?

[@deviduttpandey9120]

Give this to chinese they will make it in 300 doller

[@lenholloway4390]

When the lunatics start to run the assaylum

[@rishabh5343]

Bcci never does things like this despite being richest cricket board.

[@atultripathi9545]

Bails were 6 grams actually 😂

[@saisagarsingh3340]

its 9 grams watch again this time in correct orientation

[@satyam_suman]

How dumb the stump and the bails are? They need to be recharged? They are literally in sun all day. Did the creator not know anything about solar cells?

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

A solar cell the size of a stump cannot possibly catch enough solar radiation to power the stumps. Solar panels are extremely inefficient, which is why they need to have such a large area. They are also used in the evening - these stumps are only used for day-night pink ball tests (and limited overs matches, including evening T20 matches). For a regular daytime test match, regular wooden stumps are used.

[@akshatparashar833]

First 🥇

[@das250250]

It looked like 6 grams to me not 9

[@laugh736]

Nah was 9 it was just the camera angle If you look at the writing on the buttons it is the same way showing 9

[@rammohan1991]

Who is this fool hanging out with Gilchrist

[@tubes-lut]

Not in the spirit of the game

[@joebowden4065]

I really don’t like this presenter for some reason

[@joebowden4065]

His video with rashid khan also really annoyed me. He has the driest banter of all time

[@Tarun_singh9]

Very idiotic conversation ICC should make a rule if balls hits the stump it should be out and remove umpires call from drs Fucking cricket

[@amireallythatgrumpy6508]

Just a foolish suggestion

[@Shane-ko7lh]

The two biggest FLOGS on TV,,,, Fox sucks

[@smegma181]

There good mate

[@smegma181]

What's wrong about them

[@nightwatchman7482]

Gilly is ok, Howard is an annoyance

[@soumalyachatterjee6974]

​@@nightwatchman7482Howard is a brilliant commentator

[@flamingfrancis]

Did a cricket commentator steal your lunch at school one day?

[@markdowse3572]

As a cricket tragic, the more great insights into the game the better! 👍😄 This was awesome! M 🦘🏏😎