[Streamed Live on 22nd November, 2023] Stream: / joshuaschmidtygo Main Channel: / @joshuaschmidtygo VOD Channel: / @joshuaschmidtvod Twitter: / gamebreak0r Channel managed by: Tyl0o | / tyl0o #JoshuaSchmidt #stream #yugioh
Пікірлер: 510
@WilliFR9 ай бұрын
Konami saw 1 guy played 1 game with 3 diameter, won, never played 3 diameter ever again and in the stats they saw "Diameter at 3 has 100%WR? we need to do something"
@tehy1239 ай бұрын
Konami in Duel Links: try not to hit URs because it hurts players too much financially Konami in Master Duel: try not to hit URs because it helps players too much financially
@thepoweroftheweed22159 ай бұрын
Nah in Duel Links too it would help players, they ain't opening a box three times if a card is at two
@Flomdcho9 ай бұрын
Komoney: how do we make the most money
@FrostReave9 ай бұрын
Like the fact that Konami seriously think they can manage the game without hitting UR's is ludicrous. Konami needs to stop jumping at the short term profits for the long term. I half blame the community that continues to reward Konami for this nonsense too. Any other playerbase would have revolted by now.
@razielfaustus97339 ай бұрын
Ngl the fountain hit is pretty pog
@prestonbeaulieu43799 ай бұрын
If you think this is the worst MD banlist, you should really look at the first couple MD banlists. It would be good content
@HunterStiles6519 ай бұрын
Pretty much yeah. This banlist may not have gone as far as Josh would like, but at least it didn't look at a format that was basically unplayable and declare "This is fine. This format does not need any major course correction." This is what last month's banlist, which WAS worse banlist ever material, should've been.
@stardust94709 ай бұрын
Conq to 1 and Analyser to 2 when the problem cards were floodgates and Block Dragon.Laolao to 2 when the problem was VFD and Long Yuan to 2 when the problem card is Protos
@hurrdurrmurrgurr9 ай бұрын
VFD to 1!
@pieromorantearenaza48019 ай бұрын
MD players: complaining about Konami using the ban list as a way to amplify profits. DL players: First time?
@HunterStiles6519 ай бұрын
Even the TCG has always had this problem. It's like getting mad at the tides for sinking your boat. And this banlist was pretty good all things considered.
@LightshaverConstellation9 ай бұрын
The tcg has this problem much worse. Md is honestly generous enough with gems that I am surprised they make profit.
@xTxCxMx9 ай бұрын
@@LightshaverConstellation the MD whales whale HARD, and the people who aren't whales but want to play every new deck make them an alright chunk of change too. But like, look at the cost if a full royal rare deck.
@brago9009 ай бұрын
Literally every card game does this. Magic bans entire boxes every time they release a new box, at least in Yugioh only specific cards are hit. This way you can at least continue playing the decks you like, in magic you can't even do that.
@Fighterman4819 ай бұрын
@@brago900 I think you're misunderstanding how Magic's meta works. Magic isn't like Yugioh, where archetypes are xenophobic; often you'll see decks like "red-green aggro" or "black-white sacrifice" or similar. Those decks aren't the type that are wiped out by a set being legal, they may lose a few tools, but they're not getting banned wholesale by any means. And even in decks that revolve around one specific card or interaction, if that card goes out of rotation then that's really not much different than, say, Yugioh banning the dragon rulers. Plus, you can just go play Modern or Pioneer or Pauper or Legacy or one of the many other formats that don't rotate (and yes, those all see play, it's not like Time Wizard format where it's just a sideshow)
@codynelson75759 ай бұрын
I can think of worse hits to mathmech...Addition, Substraction, Magma, Division, Link Disicple, Runick Tip
@IyoMaestro9 ай бұрын
Ban Final Sigma it is simply too strong in Mathmech!
@al2PRO9 ай бұрын
@@IyoMaestrolmaoo 🤣🤣 can't deal with towers over there 👀? Answer: white woman jump scare
@SenHnk9 ай бұрын
Runick tip would indeed be an extremely bad bit for mathmech
@cvubini9 ай бұрын
bro dont give them ideas what will i do if final sigma is at 1 and my opponents kashtira unicorn banishes it??? I can't think of any monster I can make with 3 mathmechs that would win me the game
@lordofgarbageprogenitoroft41479 ай бұрын
😅😅😅
@Control_Devil9 ай бұрын
this reminds me exactly of that one time i searched for diameter instead of circular with cynet mining
@SenHnk9 ай бұрын
Did you have circular in hand already?
@cvubini9 ай бұрын
no they were just bming probably before going for game@@SenHnk
@nigerianprinceajani9 ай бұрын
Propably after Imperm on D'Alembert
@happo64499 ай бұрын
I sometimes do that when I open another mathmech lol
@zackmhuntr259 ай бұрын
Hey Lois
@spicymemes74589 ай бұрын
Im here just to watch Josh punch the air over Diameter
@verbalengine959 ай бұрын
Banning sigma would have been funny
@sahilm4839 ай бұрын
GIGACHAD
@soulevans75889 ай бұрын
That would be a sigma hit indeed
@krnova53 ай бұрын
no
@Salacavalini9 ай бұрын
As a Labrynth player, the best way to hit the deck is to ban EEV and Dimensional Barrier. Keeps the deck playable while getting rid of non-interactive auto-win cards that result in non-games.
@VixYW9 ай бұрын
They're still way too good without the insta win BS.
@dantevic9 ай бұрын
@@VixYW ash hurts them hard.
@airbomb249 ай бұрын
eev is prettyyl toxic ngl
@VixYW9 ай бұрын
@@dantevic Yeah, but the timing needs to be perfect, and sometimes they'll summon the monster that forbids response to their traps (dunno if it's lovely or lady) before activating the trap you needed to Ash. So it doesn't hurt them as hard as it hurts other decks.
@dantevic9 ай бұрын
@@VixYW its lovely and 99% of the time they need the trap to summon her, so you can just ash it. Only lady can be SS from the hand easily.
@brago9009 ай бұрын
Two common patterns are: 1. They do not ban cards that they believe will affect the sales of the boxes that are currently available. 2. They don't like hitting high rarity cards so they try to juggle to avoid it until the hit becomes inevitable (sometimes the juggling surprisingly works and sometimes it doesn't). In general, since the banlist is monthly, they have much more room to experiment with alternatives to the hits given in TCG and OCG.
@othonn_9 ай бұрын
I feel the real problem is that we dont have dev blogs or smth where they explain their thought process. I've come from LoL where we have extended dev blogs about pretty much every aspect of game, so we may not agree with them but at least we know why they are doing things. Even Marvel Snap has small blogs after every patch...
@xCorvus7x9 ай бұрын
That would indeed be great, although it's already pretty neat that whatever you write them about actually seems to get an answer.
@danha31079 ай бұрын
LoR also has at least small dev notes on balance changes, absolutely goated team and card game
@milesandrews67119 ай бұрын
The problem is that if they were to do this it would be extremely transparent what they want out of the Banlist It's like MBT said, they can't exactly write "We want money" under the explanations to why a card is banned
@xCorvus7x9 ай бұрын
@@milesandrews6711 They can circumscribe that though, e. g. say that a change is supposed to make the game more varied. When they speak of balancing who says that they don't mean their profits?
@milesandrews67119 ай бұрын
@@xCorvus7x if they were to argue that hitting diameter instead of circular was to make the game more varied noone would believe that shit Actually noone would buy it That's the problem, some of their hits are so ridiculous that the only reasonable way to justify them is "we want money"
@youtubeenjoyer72799 ай бұрын
as much as possible they dont want to refund UR dust imo that's why the hit seems to miss.
@tripleaaabattery84809 ай бұрын
There have been lists where they hit like 5 UR cards
@yuseifudo60759 ай бұрын
@@tripleaaabattery8480this is not what generally happens
@youtubeenjoyer72799 ай бұрын
@@tripleaaabattery8480 that's why i said "as much as possible" 😅😅😅
@trizard11869 ай бұрын
The only reason they limited cynet mining is because most got it from the salad structure deck
@dahnavonpippen65479 ай бұрын
I’ve been saying this from the start and Tear confirmed it for me. I knew the Purrely hit would be Delicious, my friend, or a cat off of rarity alone. I knew this from release. I figured if kash became meta, they would hit Shangri and birth.
@fuzzythoughts80209 ай бұрын
Prediction: next pack includes dispater and labrynth butler
@dimas-yr8un9 ай бұрын
pretty sure someone in dkayed’s stream mentioned it would be mannadium but dunno where he got that leak tho
@xCorvus7x9 ай бұрын
@@dimas-yr8un They've already keept as waiting quite a bit for the final wave of cards related to Albaz.
@dimas-yr8un9 ай бұрын
@@xCorvus7x yup it could be possible
@Blackopsspartn9 ай бұрын
Honestly I’m a bit surprised they didn’t put diameter to 2 first
@TheMeetymeet9 ай бұрын
My only logic to why they hit Stovie is not just because of the consistency in setting their traps, but it's also the better furniture that gets you a body plus one of the monsters in deck that you can usually go into Chaos Angel with otherwise it's just a "hit" for a deck that's being played a lot and became too popular.
@tompayne32009 ай бұрын
Well that and stove is also level 2 making sprite elf abuse rampant.
@258thHiGuy9 ай бұрын
The Drident unlimit scared me for 0.2 seconds until I remembered that Ratpier, Broadbull, _and_ Barrage are all still banned
@jimtsap049 ай бұрын
Lowkey ratpier could go to 1 yesterday tho
@mikaela59389 ай бұрын
Rat not being at 1 is really weird, having an Armageddon knight in that deck is fine
@RazielTheUnborn9 ай бұрын
I feel if Fenrir can be at three, Ratpier can go to semi limited or unlimited.
@258thHiGuy9 ай бұрын
@@RazielTheUnborn Fenrir is at 2
@zigzag321go9 ай бұрын
Rat could probably go to two and become a very good, but not a broken card.
@ramondewilde059 ай бұрын
Realisticly whats the issue w labyrth like outside of eev and barrier (which arent labs fault) I dont rlly see what the issue is like yh it can play or turn 0 If u wanna make that less consistent semi limit or limit clock
@gubigubigubigubi9 ай бұрын
Whats crazy to me is how they are just like Drident from 1 to 3 totally fine 0% chance this comes back to haunt us. Then they are like HMMMM Tempest to 2 just incase. Like wtf Tempest is a pack filler common card why are we being so careful with the dragonrulers 😂
@centurion23969 ай бұрын
PTSD from 2013 that never healed
@joshmountain97059 ай бұрын
Dragon link. That deck can and will abuse rulers if able.
@centurion23969 ай бұрын
@@joshmountain9705 i remember that when MBT did the unbaning 2/3rd of the banlist, quantal didn't bother putting any of the rulers, the bystials are just a strictly better option and apart from tidal and redox, the other 2 dragon rulers are trash by today's standard. Tidal is a foolish burial that needs you to open another water monster which won't happen in dragon link and redox is a reborn that needs you to open an earth. Playing the baby dragons doesn't let you use their secondary effect either since they need to discard. The rulers were a XYZ and beatstick strategy, they won't combo well with dragon link. Weirdly enough, they would combo amazingly with kashtira, all level 7 and arguably the best ruler, redox, is an earth that can banish fenrir and start combos.
@gubigubigubigubi9 ай бұрын
@@joshmountain9705 dragon link is gonna dragon link with or without the rulers. if either need to be hit its just dragon link lol
@joshmountain97059 ай бұрын
@@centurion2396 makes sense. I remembered seeing them used in one of those tournaments too but checking now it was pre bystial. I think Konami's paranoia is rather founded though. The rulers are very clearly old design philosophy.
@techiesgamer0009 ай бұрын
Master duel dev doesn't even play the goddamn game, just look at the first banlist, Rocksies and Lao-Lao to 2 like wtf, people play it at 2 anyway, Conquistador is the funny one because it's still on the list to this day.
@masterdon1879 ай бұрын
As a fellow runick (sprite and naturia) enjoyer with a royal finish fountain, was waiting for this video all day
@TimothyGod9 ай бұрын
2:29 something important note about cynet mining being at two now, it is also a structure deck card, so people like myself who bought 3 decks, can't dust their third cynet mining, unless konami lets us. What a nice hit, thanks for wasting my gems
@jacobcoates79879 ай бұрын
Woah dude dont joke about arianna at 1 thats the only real normal summon in the deck.
@SenHnk9 ай бұрын
Or saying that a welcome trap should go to one, basically killing the whole grind game of the deck. Lab is actually pretty fragile to hits, that's why I'd rather see the trap floodgates gone.
@Robbbbinator9 ай бұрын
They can hit the other lvl4 Ariane to 1, that would be fine.
@ccc28399 ай бұрын
the problem with Lab isnt Lab cards is the 3 D barier
@raizen45979 ай бұрын
At least you didnt have to deal against 6 circular but only 5 😂. Love the thumbnail so much ngl.
@cameronrobertson98009 ай бұрын
I don't play master duel so I'm not sure what the Mathmech lists look like there but Diameter in the TCG would actually be an impactful limit. If you don't want to get nibbed diameter + a name is the only consistent way to avoid it. In a format with 3 circular, it also means if alembertian gets negated laplacian won't get a negate when summoned with superfactorial. Personally I also perform this limit rather than what happened in the TCG. Mathmech players were saying since mystic fighters (and especially after ROTD) that the deck didn't have any starters, which was what was holding the deck back because the rest of the cards were already pretty good but you needed 2-3 cards to do anything
@TheKonjodan9 ай бұрын
With salad getting these retrains of different cyberse cards. I am waiting patiently for "Fire Circular" or something like thaz
@pnak0tic9 ай бұрын
"We need to hit Mathmech, we should limit the metal robot with a red background, this will be a big hit" "Ok boss, consider it done"
@nosparkss9 ай бұрын
I loooooveee Mathmech
@jarom11449 ай бұрын
Super happy about the fountain hit. Nobody likes playing against runick or its variants. Its not fun watching your opponent shuffle their interruptions back, and draw 3. Likely new interruptions. Every turn. As a quick effect. And likely protected from destruction.
@ObeliskTGS9 ай бұрын
"They miss clicked" Pretty much how I feel every time Sunseed Genius Loci isn't hit.
@technotenor04879 ай бұрын
This might be an explanation but not a justification is such a good way to say it
@TheDocperian9 ай бұрын
I can't believe we have a rival for the May 2022 one that limited Conq and semi'd Analyzer, Cobalt Sparrow, Rocksies, Fraktal, Torn Scales, Fusion Destiny and Laolao for MD's absolute most out of touch banlist
@SuperSilver3169 ай бұрын
No one gonna say anything about the Pokémon Colosseum OST
@theomnigamer91779 ай бұрын
I was going to say Gale of Darkness since it’s in both, but yeah. Still great music.
@NightyKnight099 ай бұрын
If coder is right Stovie actually makes sense since a lot of people in lower ranks will surrender after a stovie activation so its win rate might be higher than big welcome so they hit that instead of
@TheIncinerator129 ай бұрын
once you realize they were hitting winrates and look at all the cards on the list, the list makes a lot more sense.
@258thHiGuy9 ай бұрын
Semi-limiting purrely cards hurts way more than semi-ing a different archetype because you can't ever reveal all 3 copies with my friend
@leodeleon39909 ай бұрын
rip
@ApollousasBear9 ай бұрын
2 Quick Launch and 2 Chaos Space. Stop Konami, my poor dragons are gonna starve :(
@DeathlyBioShock9 ай бұрын
Based pokemon colosseum music
@KFC-Warrior9 ай бұрын
I wouldn't pick on the cynet mining hit that much, end of the day its potentially going in the right direction on the banlist at least i.e. to one.
@domenoryx34669 ай бұрын
konami would be the kind of person whom would rather lose all their limbs than to make a proper banlist
@Mr.Stitch9 ай бұрын
This whole banlist was like "hey guys, we made a banlist but didnt really feel like doing anything so we made some useless hits, also D-link is slightly worse"
@salexpie9 ай бұрын
Diameter hit actually does matter a lot imo, at least for the pure mathmech strategy. Significantly hurts the follow up which was one of the things I liked about it as a pure deck.
@PaladinMika9 ай бұрын
yeah... no
@kuma92399 ай бұрын
Fountain to 1... The world is healing. Josh is still trying to justify drawing six.
@thiccupcake16 күн бұрын
lmao
@KFC-Warrior9 ай бұрын
The exodia example was a great way of explaining the prior point.
@gungnir3829 ай бұрын
CIRCULAR WILL NEVER DIE!
@vergillives98909 ай бұрын
Pot of desires is always at 2 anyways
@larrycapija35709 ай бұрын
I'm like 70% convinced that the banlist in md is generated bye an algoritm.
@ave46229 ай бұрын
Stovie semi was such an amazing joke hit. It's hilariously ridiculous. I'm pretty sure everyone knows at this point that the banlist team are Lab players.
@tommoex9 ай бұрын
They are definitely using win rate rate when played, they spammed the win rate of cards during worlds when played, but agreed yugioh does not work this way. I was also going to say Exodia shows this is bad logic if this is the case.
@YouHadBeenH2Owned9 ай бұрын
If they really didn't want to hit circular, banning diameter would at least remove the negate from superfactorial.
@armandonoriega6819 ай бұрын
Pure Mathmech (that no one actually plays) need the omninegate, so a better hit would be Laplacian. The OTK Mathmech strategy (originally intended for the deck) doesn't rely on Laplacian, but cards like Circular and Diameter are essential.
@milesandrews67119 ай бұрын
@@armandonoriega681the OTK strategy is not the intended way to play Mathmech, who told you that? The deck was always meant to set up superfactorial to slow your opponent down with Laplacian and then follow up with the OTK Blind second dosent work because Mathmech doesn't have good board breaking tools(ironically other than Laplacian)
@armandonoriega6819 ай бұрын
@@milesandrews6711 Of course it is, just read the effect of ALL the Mathmech cards, not only the cards that are currently used. You have to do the math so that you can win with a single attack of its real boss monster, Geomathmech Final Sigma. All Mathmech cards have effects that 1) modify the attack 2) change the number of attacks or 3) special summon, all what is needed to OTK. Laplacian and the trap are the option if you are forced to go first cause they give you disruption, or follow up if you summon Magma or Alembertian instead. The boardbreakers are obviously non engine, just like in any other deck (lightning storm, harpies feather duster, kaijus, forbidden droplett, red reboot), but even Magma and Laplacian could help for that. Link climbing is NOT what the deck is intended for. It has no link names and it needs the extra monster zone to apply the most important effects in the OTK calculation (unnaffected boss Final Sigma, double attack of multiplication, double number of attacks of Nabla, Half attack of division). And that is why Mathmech is the most unique cyberse deck; its strategy is based on Synchro and XYZ summon, not link climbing like any other cyberse deck.
@gepapa36339 ай бұрын
you are undervaluing the diameter hit quite a bit. While it isn't the most impactful hit it still hurt pure mathmech quite a bit since it removes their best turn 3 follow-up/top deck and it makes the deck more susceptible to d.d. crow or the bystials since now you can snipe it at the end phase to remove the omni negate. That being said this is a pretty bad limit that only hurts pure mathmech while not affecting it's most unfair aspect which is its turn 1. And worst of all there was such a perfect hit they could have done which didn't involve limiting circular, that being banning Sigma. This mostly kills mathmech use as an engine in other cyberse decks, it stops it from being a 1 card combo, it leaves Mathmech at a better place than it was pre-circular and it's an SR so Konami avoids giving out UR points.
@kenja06859 ай бұрын
They hit Stovie because they want less targets that can be bounced by Big Welcome, and they wanted less Turn 1 set up to exist. I think Chandraglier should have also taken a hit to lower the consistency further, but they're probably waiting for the final wave of support in Butler.
@Rikako_9 ай бұрын
glad MD doesn't take the boring approach even tho we know why they do this
@Raminator2439 ай бұрын
Idk how they hit can meaningfully hit Mathmech without touching circular. Firewall defenser maybe?
@cvubini9 ай бұрын
update jammer to 0, diameter to 0 instead ( you can still otk shockingly without diameter), limiting both small world and mining instead of just mining etc there are many not like anybody is playing cyberse without mathmechs for us to care abt mining this much
@Terwano9 ай бұрын
Either of the xyz to 0 would be a massive hit. It wouldn’t kill the deck because you can still link climb with circular but it would nerf the superfactorial degeneracy.
@cvubini9 ай бұрын
@@Terwano i think if they laplacian to 0 mathmech literally doesnt have a turn 1 thats why i didnt mention it alembertian to 0 is fine though thats a really big consistency hit but it would kill the deck
@Terwano9 ай бұрын
@@cvubini You can make Darkfluid + Singularity with 1 Circular. That's a massive turn 1. Or you can make Darkfluid + heatsoul + cynet conflict. You have a lot more than super factorial.
@fathanrakha92959 ай бұрын
@@Terwano Then try making that after getting disrupted 2-3 times. At best you would end at Heatsoul. There is a reason why Superfactorial is really good because you can just dump any 3 Mathmech in graveyard and it's still usable. You don't even really need Diameter but it does became a staple since it's essentially a free negate. Unlike link climbing where there is alot of Nib and imperm moment where it can mess up all your combos. Cyberse deck aren't like Tearlaments and other "slap in your generic omni negate" deck. Diameter in hand is usually the reason why most of my play goes through just because i have that single omni negate turn 1 for safer play. Without it you can just sit on nib until the end of main phase and it still would be fine, they would only have Superfactorial anyway. And Superfactorial have lots of ways to get disrupted, so if you are doing "0 Diameter" that's just killing the deck.
@MrBones-td6qn9 ай бұрын
Konami needs to be forced to sit down with prominent community members and made to do interviews fully explaining their reasoning for all banlists.
@Flomdcho9 ай бұрын
Konami will keep hitting consistency instead of ceiling for a few reasons It continues the power creep that forces people to either play daily for gems or buy gems to get new decks that keep up It gives bad players a chance to beat good players simply because of hand draw RNG And It creates a dopamine loop with people chasing the high of a blowout win rather than boring repetitive games
@ducky36F9 ай бұрын
Master duel loves their semi-limits huh? 😂
@davescott44739 ай бұрын
This was on purpose just to make Josh angry
@akichan41689 ай бұрын
Next they will limit Superfactorial.
@colossaldonut51909 ай бұрын
Cynet Mining semi-limit is 5-head. Most people got that card from the Salamangreat Structure Deck so they can't dismantle it.
@doorto61529 ай бұрын
I think the diameter hit makes alembershen a chokepoint for the superfactorial line?
@armandonoriega6819 ай бұрын
Still they cand send it to the graveyard with Terahertz
@brandongriffin61549 ай бұрын
@armandonoriega681 less it get banish before hand. Worse case they won't get the neglect
@doorto61529 ай бұрын
@@armandonoriega681 hmm, yeah that’s a possibility. So it’s still 1-for-1 for one card for one less negate (no microcoder or fusion monster spell negate)
@-Knave9 ай бұрын
Konami refusing to acknowledge it's the floodgates that are the problem cards in Runicks for the 100th time.
@johnnycapote98179 ай бұрын
No the field spell is the problem. U draw 3 on my turn and your turn goofy
@beenthroughnam37479 ай бұрын
bruh the runick cards themselves are the floodgates
@lucaslennan33569 ай бұрын
Bro they're 15 Instant Fusions and a draw 3 on both turns, they're stupid. That said yeah ban all the floodgates.
@atrum6139 ай бұрын
I don't think you understand the definition of floodgate@@beenthroughnam3747
@phstingray2059 ай бұрын
@@beenthroughnam3747literally lying lol
@Solemn-boost9 ай бұрын
Me when the click misses
@lmr44039 ай бұрын
Small defense for the Diameter hit to 1: on 3 with the link they can simply send another one. I naturally preferred to see different harsher hits, but all these hits sort of seem in the line: People invested to make these meta decks, they will be pissed if it gets harshly hit. Also since every month there is a banlist, they can afford these minimalistic type of hits on each meta deck.
@ct12969 ай бұрын
You're never hitting diameter in a mathmech setup turn though - you'd only try to banish it on your turn when they triggered superfac. If you have a bystial/crow you either fire on sigma or save for your turn to stop the trap. Hitting diameter preemptively has never been an optimal play, and even with the card at 1 it still won't even be considered. Before the new support, you often needed diameter in hand to extend through Ash/imperm and still get full combo. Now you just need any cyberse in hand you can normal/special after being interrupted in order to send diameter with terraherz
@lmr44039 ай бұрын
@@ct1296 I didn't say anything about pre-emptively. You naturally chain bystial/dd if possible to superfactorial. My point was more intended at the recovery capabilities with cards like equation/splashmage at turn 3. And don't get me wrong, I am not saying that it is a real hit to the deck as the turn 1 plays stay unaffected.
@ct12969 ай бұрын
@@lmr4403 sorry I get you now - I just feel like that doesn’t matter at all, since mathmech is such an aggro-style deck that probably loses if its unable to use its main disruptions
@lmr44039 ай бұрын
@@ct1296 Yeah, I got this month to m1 with 3 nibs in two of my main decks. So many aggro decks this month that simply lose to it.
@emperorshun47509 ай бұрын
Cant wait to see his reaction to the Toy cards that search Circular :)
@simonius019 ай бұрын
What be a better hit to mathmech other than limiting Dia or Circular? I don't see a hit that would do just little more
@flappy73059 ай бұрын
I love the background sound of the game pokemon xd in your videos
@marhar98029 ай бұрын
Do you think Naturia Ruinick will still be playable in MD ranked? Really enjoyed watching it and was building it up and just need a couple of URs to finish it
@StrangeSynergy9 ай бұрын
They took out my boy... My beautiful boy diameter... He didnt event do anything wrong...
@aquaenjoyer16129 ай бұрын
maaaaan i was starting to enjoy fur hire runick spright Sadge
@azharzhya13059 ай бұрын
Not bad for filling the banlist. Some cards are released to increase the power of some decks and reduce the consistency of some decks as well. Even so, it's still funny because there are worse cards to ban but they choose cards with a lower ratity which obviously don't have much impact in the deck itself, but it's a different story if they ban the worse cards. This reminds me of when the "tearlament" cards were released.
@nigamnation9 ай бұрын
Miss clicked? What about mr clicked?
@Leonardo.ohime.i9 ай бұрын
thye greedclicked
@armandonoriega6819 ай бұрын
Imagine to draw the two Purrelys 🥴 even drawing one of them limits the plays. Maybe we should start looking at cards like Monster Reborn or Kinka-Byo to have more excavations with Purrely.
@Chackothewacko9 ай бұрын
Hand trapping the rank 4 and if they had raw diameter you stopped nothing. This diameter to one helped with those scenarios
@alphu59 ай бұрын
ohno not my 1 copy of Diameter 😢
@TheTaintedWisdom9 ай бұрын
10:49 - Restricting the maid over Stovie would've been one of the WORST hits to Labrynth if you wanted to limit its power. Stovie works going 1st OR 2nd, despite not being able to get monsters can still get the Field Spell if need be, summons itself, can be used to summon Chaos Angel, can still trigger its effect once on the field, *AND* triggers the recovery effect of Cooclock! Meanwhile, Arianna can search Lady, Draw a card, and summon a monster... but won't be able to search if your opponent has Ash... or Imperm... or Veiler... or Droll if you used Extrav/Prosperity 1st. You know? Only SOME OF THE MOST UBIQUITOUS HAND TRAPS IN THE ENTIRE MOTHERFUCKING GAME??? 12:18 - I barely see Runick *PERIOD!!!* It's total bullshit!!! Konami Employee 1: "Hey, Kashtira is literally everywhere and has no bans despite having cards banned in *BOTH* formats, has the single most powerful form of removal in the game, can lock down your zones, has a walking Macro summonable from the Extra Deck that gets back materials for its most powerful effect by just playing the game, and can recover literally any monster as long as your opponent isn't ALSO playing it, should we do something about it?" KE2: "NAH! In fact, why don't we shit on some other decks that haven't seen any play whatsoever?" KE1: "JUST AS LONG AS WE DON'T BAN SPRIGHT ELF! OKAY?!? WE CAN'T MAKE SENSE BY BANNING A CARD SO CLEARLY BROKEN WE NEEDED TO BAN IT IN BOTH FORMATS! I'M FUCKING SERIOUS!!! WE *CAN'T* MAKE *ANY* SENSE!!!!!" KE2: "I know, this is literally the 31,044,013th time you and every other person here has said that, we all know the rules. But I was thinking we shit on something *_other_* than Spright this time? Since we basically have "Runick but better in literally every" way in Purrely, (nice job on making it even more insufferable by making them cats by the way) I was thinking we could take a massive shit on Runick and give a light tap on the wrist to Purrely just to rub AIDs infected blood in the wound?" KE1: "That's stupid, nonsensical, and cruel. I fucking love it! Meet you at 5 for the usual puppy torture murder sesh?" KE2: "You know it buddy! Oooh, make sure you put in a good word with the boss during your meeting on Thursday, I really want to get on Satan's good side." 13:01 - I thought this was Circular for the longest time (i.e. until I was writing this comment just now) because I have more than 2 brain cells and didn't allocate the focus and brain power necessary to look more closely at something that *MUST* have been Circular. And here I thought I was being comedically hyperbolic with the above bit...
@ayham6139 ай бұрын
I’m a labrynth player and I will tell you hitting arianna would’ve been worse Cause yeah stovie summons itself But arianna literally searches anything so if you open arianna 1st turn is always better than opening stovie and yeah hitting stovie kind of make it more rare to full combo turn 0 but overall not very big of a deal
@shaedeymamlas54969 ай бұрын
Next banlist, sigma to 2, superfactorial to 2
@SamuraiXKdubs9 ай бұрын
Mathmech used to be rogue in MD, did Mathmech even top in the Duelist cup?
@NemesisUmbral9 ай бұрын
Considering the explanation for the bans especially Fountain and Diameter, is it really the case that the ones behind the banlist actually play the game? Or is there this mythical “Konami Quota” that is looming over them on what to hit or slap on the wrist? Hence the avoidance of URs getting hit.
@Rabidragon92419 ай бұрын
RIP Fountain
@DonMarzzoni9 ай бұрын
Thank God rot in hell
@Rabidragon92419 ай бұрын
@@DonMarzzoni nooooo
@VixYW9 ай бұрын
@@DonMarzzoni Say what you will about it, Runick was a great engine if you had it and wanted to save gems and crafting materials on events. It worked with almost anything, filling up spots for any missing cards that you wouldn't need to craft, and there's no good replacement for it in the game as of now. Maybe when we get the Horus engine, but that's so far off... Ah... I miss the pure Runick deck without any floodgates that was playable for... what, 2 months before they hit the good quick play spells? It was such a fun do or die deck.
@vergillives98909 ай бұрын
Fountain is fine safe in the packaging
@ShonenGoon9 ай бұрын
@@VixYW Konami is stupid af for hitting runick again
@JumpinWasTaken9 ай бұрын
MD giving josh a coder treatment.
@xenonim9 ай бұрын
If konami MD don want to hit circular. The card there must hit will be sigma to 1 copy, because sigma is main combo pieces. Banning sigma will automatically make circular from being 1 card combo to 2 card mathmech combo, and completely kill superfactorial combo from XYZ laplacian.
@reirei_tk9 ай бұрын
MATHMECH BEST DECK LET'S GOOOOOOOOO
@chocolatepotato54699 ай бұрын
I think the banlists in masterduel are generated by AI that reads the success rates of cards. then the devs alter it slightly to not remove staples that are just good not too broken. Next banlist they will ban diameter....
@samifaride32459 ай бұрын
Isn't circular limited in OCG?
@renaldyhaen9 ай бұрын
Paper player always forget this game have monthly banlist. Unlike the paper when you can only get a banlist 4-6 months once. Suddenly make a deck weak is a bad way to "balance" the deck in Master Duel. Because we all know next month, the dev will drop 1-2 new banlist to weakens some decks again. . Maybe we can keep it "fresh" if Konami can release a new impactful deck every months too. But because we usually get an impactful deck in 3-4 months. I think the dev want to slowly changes the META until the new impactful decks released. . Skill Drain and Gozen already limit. I think it is fair for a non-searchable cards in limited list. Personally I like to hit Hugin (limit) to balance all variant. Limit Hugin mean less access to the field spell (and multiple draws), less consistent Non-OPT backrow (floodgates) protection, and less extender or opening for combo variant. Fountain limit will make the pure version fragile. This don't really impactful for combo version, because the Fountain in combo variant usually just become "cherry on top" after they make a good board, and they can still play if the Fountain banished or gone.
@vergillives98909 ай бұрын
Dragon link rarely uses quick launch when bysteels exist
@VillyIsThatYou9 ай бұрын
I'm new to Master Duel and Purrely is my first deck so I'm happy to see the hits are pretty minor, I expected Sleepy to be hit but I understand now that they don't like to hit UR's so I guess the draw 6 combo still survives! Hope Epurrely Noir comes out soon!
@KixMusaid9 ай бұрын
Hear me out.. now stay with me.. ban Maxx C..
@D4PPZ4569 ай бұрын
I feel like they should start unlimiting the Adventure cards. They aren't making anything broken at full power but they will allow rogue decks to have a chance.
@1stCallipostle9 ай бұрын
I'm gonna be real dawg, I still dont know what the hell they do
@jimtsap049 ай бұрын
@@1stCallipostlethey basically just make a token, a level 7 that can omni negate, and an equip spell that can bounce things at the cost of not using effects on normal summoned monsters
@1stCallipostle9 ай бұрын
@@jimtsap04When reading them some time ago, i caught literally none of that. So good to know
@thyme39729 ай бұрын
Adventure Tenyi immediately becomes something to think about at that point. Tomahawk is legal, auroradon is legal, and so is denglong. No halq hurts, sure, but you gotta remember that Kashtira cards pretty much make getting 7’s on the field really easy.
@ccc28399 ай бұрын
adventurer tenyi is so much worse than just playing swordsoul since halq banned@@thyme3972
@Ferna4719 ай бұрын
The Diameter limit is insteresting, it might not be a huge hit but should still be a somewhat decent nerf to mathmech, however fountain to 1 ain't it, should have been runick tip but with fountain at 1 is pretty much not worth playing the deck
@daedalus52539 ай бұрын
25:33 Joshua Schmidt: „Wir schaffen das“
@ThienNguyen-lk6xd9 ай бұрын
Fountain at 1, be grateful that they didn't do that 10 months ago coward free win
@shakeweller9 ай бұрын
Both welcome traps should have gone to 1. Circular to 1. And Chaos Ruler needs to go
@kbthegoatw9 ай бұрын
Bro just want Lab to be unplayable ☠️
@jackrodriguez34049 ай бұрын
Dragon link can have chaos spaces and a million follow up in md with the dragon miller but god forbid I get two branded fusions. I fucking hate master duel
@SuperMophie9 ай бұрын
I don't know, I feel like they didn't
@brennolima44129 ай бұрын
i think that in MD case, doesn't it matter if the card is UR or not
@brutalnobody52409 ай бұрын
Banlists are forgivable along as we get monthly banlist