Thinking about Arbor Low

[@MikeGreenwood51]

Is the view point expressed in the video of any particular relevance. If it fails to give very basic dates about the supposed time period when those supposed Elitest Mound Builders existed to impose their authority. Then is the viewpoint relavant. Was the narrator talking of Neolithic tribal culture or Paleolithic or Mesonlithic or post Roman? To me it is like a piece of a jigsaw puzzel which is out side other assembled pieces which all fit in to a specific time frame. Here we have an alone piece using pictures of more mondern 1930s to 1950s people. So were those the supposed elitest mound builders. The alone jigsaw piece seems just does not seem to fit. Could be a usefull insight in to changing cultural thinking if it was relavant to a specifice people, tribe or time period. It the tribal thinking is circa 1st century then the addition of the modern era people seems out of context. Making the narration almost seem a collection of disjointed irrelavant potentionally unrelated fragments of something. LOL-But please do not worry about what I wrote. It's just my own viewpoint and opinion. If the supposed elitests were paleolithic. Then my respects to them. As if they built a Henge Hill Fort then that which was build likly was of importance to those who used it. But I suspect the jigsaw pieces are some what confused in the mists of time with Romano Britannic 1st or 2nd Century Druidic tribal cultures and revivalist modern-age Druidic revivalism (So called Paganism)..