Thinking About Buying the LEICA Q2? Here's Why You Shouldn't

INSTAGRAM: TheMonochromeMemoirs / PerlaImages
PORTFOLIO: www.perlaimages.com
FACEBOOK: / themonochromememoirs
Support the channel:
JOIN: / @themonochromememoirs
PAYPAL: www.paypal.com/donate/?token=...
PATREON: / themonochromememoirs
Links to gear I use:
Nikon Z6: amzn.to/2rDuG1s
Nikon Z50: amzn.to/2OogjXV
CAME TV Boltzen 55w: amzn.to/36NVjQ7
Strobius 85 Bag: amzn.to/2GJiEbk
GODOX V860 N: amzn.to/2XhdElO
MAGMOD Kit: amzn.to/2Oe4nGP
Meike MK-Z7G Z6/Z7 Grip: amzn.to/32VhP7M
C10 CheetahStand: amzn.to/3b4RHwz
Manfrotto Nano Stand: amzn.to/2zRU5FJ
Nikkor 24-70 F/4S: amzn.to/2TUfaJk
Nikkor 35 1.8S: amzn.to/2Lrrcpb
Nikkor 50 1.8S: amzn.to/2NRaLVT
Nikkor 85mm 1.8 S: amzn.to/2pnIJHM
Nikkor 60mm 2.8 Macro: amzn.to/2zYRaLr
Sigma 24 1.4: amzn.to/2ZOTM9b
Nikkor 70 - 200 Z: amzn.to/2ubU2Fr
Nikkor 85 1.8G: amzn.to/2NQOx6w
Atmosphere Spray: amzn.to/2NQOxn2
Smoke Pencil: amzn.to/2R6Th9y
Godox Trigger: amzn.to/2Llw0xr
Rope Camera Strap: amzn.to/31jXARZ
Black Rapid Strap: amzn.to/2Llw93X
Sony 120 gb XQD: amzn.to/2ZTgRHE
Batteries: amzn.to/2LwiINk
In this video I share my thoughts on the Leica Q2 and my review after using it on two weddings and two engagement shoots. I think the camera has some unique strengths but overall is not worth $5,000 for what is currently available from other brands. Im sure you will all have questions about how it performs in other areas so feel free to drop a comment and ill answer as best as I can. Thanks for watching - Will

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

In this video I share my thoughts on the Leica Q2 and my review after using it on two weddings and two engagement shoots. I think the camera has some unique strengths but overall is not worth $5,000 for what is currently available from other brands. Im sure you will all have questions about how it performs in other areas so feel free to drop a comment and ill answer as best as I can. Thanks for watching - Will

[@anoopchaudhary8732]

Hi I really love watching your videos. However in this video your sound volume was too low and I had to increase my phone speaker volume all the way up to hear what you saying. Keep making good content like this. Have a nice day

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

@@walkingmeditation61 meh.. way overpriced at 5K imo. Glad you're enjoying it though!

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Already sold it. Lost $400

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

@@walkingmeditation61 You too!

[@WhitecatProject]

Title: Do not buy a Lotus Elise!!! (In the video: to travel with your five member family on a road trip)

[@harjand]

I take your point regarding the price and functionality of the Leica Q2 for wedding photographers. However, having owned the Q2 for over a year now, it has become my favorite camera. I would strongly recommend anyone buying any camera to perform due diligence to meet your needs (research before buying). There are plenty reviews that would steer you away from the Q2 as a wedding shooter. The Q2 is well suited for travel, street, some landscape, and macro. It is a fixed lens camera that travels well and is convenient when you want to leave your multiple cameras and lenses at home and take one excellent camera that will deliver drop-dead, gorgeous shots. For me, no regrets.

[@aviatorman8]

Me too! No regrets. It performs so well for my landscape and macro photography. I’m all for the all-in-one full frame high res cameras. Sony disappointed me by not releasing the X1R M3 this year so I decided to go with the Q2. And now even if Sony releases theirs keeping the 35 mm focal length, I won’t regret buying the Q2 as I prefer the 28 mm for landscape. Perfect purchase for me just in time for the fall season colors!

[@Junior-mw1zn]

Adding the Q2 to my leicam10p

[@Junior-mw1zn]

@@walkingmeditation61 😁👍🏾

[@veejaymexico4840]

I'm thinking of going into the pizza delivery business, Do you think I should use a Lamborghini or a perhaps a Ferrari? I'll be picking up my long awaited Q2 in a couple of weeks, and it cannot come soon enough! To me, a Leica is like a pallet, paint and fine brushes, to make art with. If this Gent wanted a fast camera, then a Sony would have been the better choice. Happy Shooting to all Q2 users!!

[@jasoncar141]

I agree. Leica Q2 is amazing for travel

[@Nuvempreta2007]

If you bought a Leica Q2 for weddings,...what should I say? Do you understand photography?

[@johnsee8778]

Shooting a Q2 as a Wedding Camera is like setting up as a delivery company and buying a Ferrari rather than a van. Pick the tool for the job

[@GoodLifeInSpain]

Spot on!

[@johnhoey7717]

Sounds a bit FOMOish; I’m guessing you don’t own one, right?

[@justonbrazda3846]

The q2 is not a Ferrari though. More like a rolls Royce or Bentley. A Sony A1 would be the Ferrari.

[@dominik78kinimod]

I think the better title will be: “Why Leica Q2 is not good for me” It is really valuable video with a lot of helpful information, but as I mentioned I read it as - what is not fit you doesn’t mean will not fit the others.

[@AlexandreGrison]

The lens on the Q2 is a summilux not a summicron. I still don't regret my money, it's worth every penny, the Q2 is just outstanding, a gift from Leica for us to enjoy

[@michaellutherdavies]

I am 70 years old and from the age of ten comming from a poor family living in London UK I had my first Leica it took a lot of savings from my newspaper rounds ETC.After selling my leicas and buying model after model i always made a profit. now the proud owner of the Q2

[@veejaymexico4840]

I’ve only had my Leica Q2 two weeks and just the fact that on working a piece of art, I am my own MASTER of “selective focus” and the Leica will never override my decisions regarding any manual settings, would be reason enough to never discuss the price of this fine instrument. That, and the fact that now, I am out of bed two hours earlier than accustomed, walk many more miles than I thought capable, and when my fellow photogs. are packing up to go home, the Q2 and I are just getting started...and did I mention, I’m almost 90. Most of the comments I read about the price tag of the q2 are from people who buying them for vanity’s sake. The Q2 is not for sports, weddings, or videos, or the bells and whistles of a fully automatic digital camera, rather, it is a magical instrument that will meet you halfway in creativity. Both intuitively and spiritually. Happy shooting Leica Q2 brothers and sisters!

[@GBB70]

@@veejaymexico4840 I own the Z7/Z6, but only shoot manual focus prime lenses. I am 69 and have retired my AF plastic lenses. Classic Zeiss, Voigtlander, and Nikkor AIS are now my stable of lenses. I am purchased a used Sony a7ii and having it converted to a monochrome only camera body using the same lenses. The images from such a converted camera yields the same creamy monochrome images as the Q2M. Best of both worlds. Happy shooting with the Q2.

[@WhitecatProject]

Why you don’t put an accurate title: to not buy Q2 for weddings? Come on now. It’s an amazing lens/camera, which of course you also clarify in the video, and it’s for specific uses and not for every situation. But your title is generalized and thus not accurate. I bought this camera knowing 100% that I would never use it for paid assignments (no tether, no usbc, no proper flash system, no real autofocus, noise at high iso, etc).

[@ernieblarinckx9888]

Maybe I could be wrong but it takes time to learn how to use a Q2. It's a learning curve. But If you know how to set it up you don't have to dive in menu's ! You only need 3 buttons to reach every function you need. Even with the new firmware things are even better. So I think, you didn't take the time to use the Q2 as Leica developed it. You want to use it as a nikon. I can do things faster on my Q2 than on a Nikon Z6 … Sorry, but thats just the way it is. So before going out with a new brand, learn how to use all it's options.

[@FrankWestPR]

As mentionned earlier you got the wrong expectation on the Q2. It is not a camera for action photography and you looked at it as if it was a Canon/Nikon/Sony camera. Think of the size of the Q to implement a Full Frame sensor and all the tech that goes with it. The Q2 really shine for Street/Travel photography. You take a few days to implement your likings into the different menu shortcut such as the FN button, choose one autofocus option or eventually work on profiles and that's it. Personally I use zone focusing, manual focus with focus peaking with that zoom shortcut on the dial button and the Touch AF & release and that's it. As for the price, it cost the price of an M lense, where you would usualy add 7000$ for the body, so Leica to speak it is a bargain. If auto focus is important to you switch to Sony, no other company comes close to their system.

[@honeysucklecat]

Sony doesn’t have the build quality as Nikon, nor the lens selection. Sony does video well.

[@shiyangzhang110]

Well, we certainly need to hear a second voice. But I think the most of the Q2’s disadvantages you talked about come from Leica’s philosophy. I don’t really consider the Q2 being desiged for wedding or any similar work projects. It sounded wierd to me listening you complaining about crop modes, that functionality is simply not designed to replace lenses/view angles and I think you as a pro should already know it perfectly. Let’s admit it, the Q2 is for fun. I don’t own one, but borrowed it for a few times during the last year and half. It renders colours in a such pleasant way that surprises me everytime I use it. It seems that the Fuji X100 series may be a very good rival for the Q2 as a number YT reviewers compare these two cameras. But almost every signle reviewer recommends buying a Q2 instead of a X100 at the end, while don’t really offer an objective argument since the X100 offers a ton of functions more and is certainly much cheaper (not exactly a cheap camera, but much cheaper than a Leica). I guess Leica is the reason :D So, I would recommend buying one only if you know what you are looking for in a camera (and well funded, of course). For me, it is fun, and I will probably buy a similar camera sometimes, but an interchangeable system suits me just fine now.

[@tundrusphoto4312]

The Leica Q2 isn't by any stretch of the imagination, a camera for doing weddings or "action" photography. It is like many Leica's, a camera for a slower, more deliberate pace of shooting. It works best for a fine art style of shooting. Or, doing a zone focus. So not surprised it would be frustrate you.

[@deevnn]

Tundrus... completely agree. He didn’t do his homework or he just doesn’t get it. This video was a waste of time for everyone including him.

[@TKim103]

So this review is like hearing someone that drives a Jeep and complain about why the Porsche 911 doesn’t work for him. They’re both designed for different photographers (coming from a Sony and Leica guy here). A high-end DSLR will have more utility and options, but Leica cameras are a bit more focused. Restricting, yeah, but it wasn’t designed to do everything - you have Canon, Sony and Nikon for that.

[@markytyz6753]

I swapped my Leica m 246 for a Leica q2. I absolutely love this camera. The resolution allows for so much flexibility and the colours are amazing. I have a Sony A 7 111 too and I find i no longer use this.

[@anirudhtd7193]

No longer use A7iii or Leica?

[@merryvale98]

Own the z6, z7, and QP. The QP is my fav. I get more genuine, candid shots with it. There is sacrifice because you do slow down but the QP for me makes my art and captures my candid life shots. My family has no clue I’m shooting. The nikon’s are for work. I’d never shoot a Q for a wedding, probably not even the SL2. The Q’s are a different tool in the chest capturing totally different images than the z’s. Lack of a flip out screen isn’t a matter. I’ll use zone manual focus and knowing the angle of view, I’ve gotten great at shooting from the hip with my thumb and working the focus ring with my index finger. A lot of times I’m not looking at the screen or viewfinder. I’m in the conversation capturing the moment at the same time, but again, if it’s a wedding I’m not shooting that way. I’m making 100% I’m composed and nailing focus. Different scenarios. Your right the files are large but to Leica’s credit I can push my QP files more than my z7 files. The QP hits the 24mp sweet spot with amazing files. You also forgot to mention macro mode which is an incredible option to have. Also, PRO TIP: purchase your Leica used from one of the stores. You can often get warranties and save a bundle. My QP was used and in amazing shape. Leica Store Miami does a great job listing their used equipment.

[@actionguitar]

You're actually wrong about the crop vs. lenses with equivalent focal distance. For example, if you shoot the same subject from the same distance with a 50mm lens and with the q2 cropped to a 50mm equivalent, the compression and overall appearance will be very similar in both cases. It's the distance to your subject that matters more. Also the bokeh translates when cropping. For example, a 25mm f/2 lens cropped to a 50mm equivalent will result in a very similar bokeh as a 50mm f/4 lens when shot at the same distance to the subject. Many people get this wrong but this knowledge has been around for decades. So has been Leica.

[@stevearita3267]

Hi, just found your channel and subscribed. I don't own a Q2, my camera gear is Sony. I am not a professional, just an enthusiast shooter. Curious, what do you think about the Q2 Monochrome? Thanks!

[@study.cooking]

So you have bought a NON wedding camera (fixed lens, lack of on-body controls, no wireless flash ttl transmitters, etc) and used it for weddings and your conclusion is it not worth $5k? Use your Ninon Z for diving or shaving...and it will fail, it’s not for that purpose.

[@manojchandramishra906]

Thanks. How is this video shot? Which camera and lens?

[@alexdaniels3061]

Thanks for this video, I found your perspective really interesting and can completely understand why the Leica Q2 isn't for you. Unlike many of the previous commenters who have the Q2, I actually took the opportunity to buy a Q when the Q2 came out because many people traded in their Qs. It was a good opportunity to get a Q at a good price (I bought it at a Leica Store and it had been serviced by Leica). I really fell in love with my Q and the images it creates. I was, however, wondering if I should have bought the Q2, even though I felt that the price was a bit too high for me. After watching your video, especially the comment about the file size from the Q2, I think I made a good choice with the used Q. I'm not doing any kind of professional photography such as wedding photos, it's just been a very long time hobby for me and I am really happy with the Q (my other Leica is an M6 - I'm slow on the uptake with digital... I like the darkroom). I guess what I'm saying with this comment is that I completely understand your criticisms in light of what you need from a camera and I also appreciate the criticisms because now I don't need to rethink if I should have bought the Q2. The Q is perfect for me. Thanks!

[@HEARTISTWORLD]

What do you think about the z6 and z7 2?

[@takakura5921]

Just interested to know what camera you use to make this video?

[@rjacob06]

Welcome back. You have a very fair critique on the Leica Q2. You mentioned both the camera's strengths and weaknesses very clearly. Leica cameras are great for hobbyists who have a lot of money. They never have been great for working professionals. The Leica SL2 would be more suitable for paid professional work. Also, Leica is very old school and they tend to not embrace newer technology. It's AF system is still inferior to that of Sony or Canon. In fact, the Nikon Z series AF system is superior to Leica's despite its weaknesses. Still, Leica has beautiful cameras. One thing I enjoy about Leica is that they really force people to slow down their photography and appreciate the process.

[@schtggl6265]

"Nikon Z series AF system is superior to Leica's despite its weaknesses." There is often obviously not necessarily the apparatus weak...

[@bnwstreetfr1275]

Leica as never been great for working professional???? in the wedding field probably for reporter, documentary or street photographer it’s quiet the opposite there isn’t one of the big names on this field not using a leica !! And the autofocus in those fields is a non subject as when you want to be really fast at focusing you practice zone focusing indessly and at some point any guy that master done focusing will have clean shot ten time faster than any other guy relying on autofocus even the sony or canon one …

[@lrb05131963]

You’re crazy,what makes a shooter professional,it’s getting paid right,lol, there are folks getting highly paid in Hollywood and in the fashion industry who use this Q2 and make way more than most professional utube photographers ,it’s how you use a TOOL ,not what it is . This guy was talking about how SLOW the Q2 is but he bought it for what it was NOT made for,right tool for the right job…

[@JLStreetDoc]

Lot of money? You don’t have to be rich to own a Leica, just disciplined enough to save. That’s like saying only rich people can drive a car.

[@DolisterCovers]

I always love your stance on these things, man! You gave it a good couple big shoots, that's SO much more than what most people do to give a review haha! I'm glad you are doing so well this year.

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Really appreciate that homie!

[@hansgaber6038]

Hm, i am a semi-pro photographer, and i do street, art and erotic-art photography. I don't agree at all with the headline "Here's why you should not". This statement is totally wrong, and i would really ask people who are interested in the Q2, not to rely on this one statement only. I am shooting almost everything in manual focus mode, as well no program automatics. And i can do fantastic shoots with this camera. You points out the wedding photography, and you might be right on a lot of comments. But this camera is so much more than just a "overpriced toy for the rich". If speed and money is an issue for someone, leave your fingers from it, for everyone else, it is an amazing piece of art and gear.

[@chrisconnorton6488]

Great to see you back with another very informative vid. I was flip flopping between Nikon and Canon....and just decided that I am a nikon guy as I strated out with the FTn in 1969. People kept saying that the colour science on the Canon was great....actually I much preferred the Nikon files from the 750 through to the Z6...so just sold all my 5d4 and all the lenses!

[@ebreckpo6563]

Having used the Leica Q2 myself I understand your frustrations.... pros - gorgeous image quality and colours. - leaf shutter camera, still better than electronic shutter and no need for HSS as you can go up to 1/2000s with a regular flash without loosing power. Alternatives some medium format, Fujifilm X100(X), Ricoh GR(X)... - some sort of weather sealing. - minimalistic menu system and 3 buttons you can tweak and fairly quickly reassign with a long press of the button. Leica tries to have a streamlined menu system across their camera systems (SL2, CL, M) - Excellent electronic viewfinder. - AF performance, for me it is very fast. I still use AF in old school mode as I did with my Nikon F4 (AF-S with centre focus point and use focus and recompose technique). Unless bride and groom are chasing each other I do not see why you need those other gimmicks. - A "real" manual focus lens which can be used for zone focussing as you have a depth of field scale. - a close distance mode "macro" not a real macro but good enough in field use. - the described cropped mode is non destructive on raw files and shows your cropping when using LR/ACR. JPG files are cropped destructively. cons - huge files sizes due to the large mp sensor. Do we need that extra resolution? - higher iso files not so good, certainly if you intend to crop your images. - EVF eyecup scratches easily same as on Q1 and is not user serviceable. Apparently the whole EVF assembly has to be replaced. - 28mm focal length. Perhaps a nice focal length for all those "mobile phones photographers" but in my opinion to wide, I mostly used the camera in 35mm or 50mm crop mode. I started my photography in the 70ies a 50mm and 35mm were the norm. As you stated a crop mode is not the same as a real 35 or 50mm - AF not as tweakable as other AF cameras. Although the camera is not intended for sports photography. - expensive although "same price as the Summicron M 28mm "you get a "free" camera body with it. - expensive extra battery. The main reason I sold the camera after 1 year is mostly because of the 28mm fov. I tried and tried hard but 28mm is not my cup of tea.... Is it a bad camera, not at all, but not for my type of photography. I still love the M system and unless my eyesight goes terribly wrong I stick to these cameras (at least in the Leica system). These are of course my opinions

[@gurugamer8632]

Hi do you know any good in camera picture profile for Sony A7riv that will give be a Leica Monochrome look ?

[@mannyva01]

Glad to see you back brother...... question what do you think of upcoming z6 ii and z7 ii releasing...... would you consider upgrading to that system? Or stick with the original z6 z7 z50?

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Can’t wait for the mark 2! Will definitely be cycling into them on release

[@Coldgecko]

Dude, I love your review - very relevant. I have been toying for such a long time to buy a Q2 as a 3rd camera to play around. I shoot with Sony A7RIII and A7III -- Going to upgrade to A7IV after virus -- I love large files because I adventure travel tons around the world in super remote places -- not like weddings where you can set things up -- I always need to crop. So now I was looking at the Q2 monochrome to mess around with on my travels since I love BW shots. I do have FU money -- but its still an issue with investing time into something that is not worthwhile. Last, is there anyone who has posted the difference between Q2 monochrome shots and a Sony A7RIII or IV -- both in B&W messed around in Lightroom? I really rally would love to see that. Is there a difference?

[@GBB70]

I am having a Sony A7ii converted to a monochrome camera. I shot with the Q2M for 2 weeks before returning it and yes, there is an image difference in converting RGB to monochrome verses the raw files from the Q2M. The question is- is the cost difference worth it? I don't think so. That is why I purchased a used A7ii and having it converted to monochrome.

[@duanemcclun]

Welcome back Will!! Glad to see a video pop up. I hope you and your family are staying well and safe! Best wishes Duane

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Great to hear from you man, appreciate the kind words 🤝

[@duanemcclun]

@@TheMonochromeMemoirs When you get caught up and have catched your breath from your busy schedule let me know and I'll shoot you an email as I have a equipment question. Best Duane

[@aviatorman8]

Good video man! It was recommended by YT after watching some reviews on the camera. I bought mine less than a month ago and love it. I shoot landscape and nature so the slowness isn’t a factor but understand where you’re coming from relative to your type of photography. Honestly I’ve been disappointed by Sony for not releasing the X1R M3 the competitor to Q2. I’m all for the fixed lens full frame and after waiting for Sony forever, I couldn’t anymore and went with the Q2. Expensive option for sure. But so far enjoying the all in one 47 MP full frame for my landscape. In fact if Sony releases the X1R M3 keeping the 35 mm focal length, I’m not going to regret my decision buying the Q2 as I love the 28 mm for landscape. Cheers from WA!

[@Fleet42]

I have the Leica CL I love it and you’re right about the colors that come out of the Leica Sensors. My question is why not shoot manual focus? I only have manual focus lens in my opinion that’s the best way to shoot Leica cameras.

[@PaulQuinones]

Good to see you Will.. Glad things worked out for you so far in 2020. Hope you and family are well and great advice on the Leica.. Sounds nice and although image quality is important obviously, I'm very happy with my z6 and I'm now waiting for the z62 announcement.

[@kindface]

Sounds like there are two things here: 1. You’re used to the ‘no surprises’ predictability and muscle memory of using your Nikon Z for your job 2. Your haven’t really reflected or thought through what you actually wanted the Leica for. It’s just not suited to your job; very little to do with the quality of the Q2 per se.

[@victorlim5077]

Man, your experience almost mirrors my experience with the Original Fuji X100. Beautiful camera, great image quality but man, the camera was slow like a tortoise. Obviously the current X100V iteration is fantastic but the big hit when I sold my X100 meant I never went back to Fuji.

[@danielvernon2913]

I’ve owned the Z6 which I sold and went to a SonyA7iv. I also have the Leica Q2 which I brought for my wife. It completely depends on what you want. A Leica Q2 or any Leica really isn’t going to fit a wedding photographer (or any speedy work) it’s just not what they are made for. But we both love the Q2, it’s become our travel camera and also my wife uses it for behind the scenes shots of shoots. In the video you compare computer use so like using an old model computer. I’d compare it more to the keyboard. You still get a lot of writers who buy old style keyboards and love using them because it makes them feel part of the words more. The Q2 is that, it makes you feel more a part of it. The lack of tilting scene makes you get down on the floor which not everyone likes to do, but I like that it makes me do more, makes me consider more. No I’d never use it for a professional shoot but I still use it all the time. The pictures you get don’t compare to any others. The richness and beauty of the colors it captures are amazing. It’s definitely only a camera for certain people and for me anyone that is wanting something for professional speedy work, this don’t fit. But for an enjoyable out and about camera I love it. The price for accessories is crazy though, add another grand just to get them.

[@kindface]

You’re spot on - just about any Leica is not the right tool for wedding photographers. Just wished he had “looked into it” more thoughtfully before buying a Leica on impulse and then rant about it.

[@TheLAinME]

I have the Q2 and the Z6ii and love both. I mainly use the Q2 for travel and walk around and am thrilled by the results. I use it with single point AF-S. But for any kind of events or situation that requires continuous AF or longer reach, the Z6ii is better suited.😊

[@92cstevens]

I have the Leica Q2 and use Sony mirrorless cameras. For me, the Q2 is what I use for street, environmental portraits (which are AMAZING with this thing), travel, and even some landscapes. I use my Sony gear for fast action needs like events, weddings, wildlife. I don't think the Leica Q2 is what I would ever grab for a wedding unless it was for a more relaxed couples shot... but totally agree about how slow it is and the damn buffer is a tortoise. That being said, the images I've made with the Leica have been my all time favorites for the reasons you mentioned: image quality, colors, etc., but one thing you missed was how this thing makes black and white images SING. In terms of focusing, most Q2 users shy away from the tracking focus mode and prefer single point (I do as well) as that is where this shines. Think you made the right call in the end as it really isn't a wedding camera. Excellent video!

[@romzaish]

No matter how good a Ferrari might be, it would suck off-road. I just think the Leica Q2 is not made for wedding photography.

[@jmackultra]

No matter the application, I feel like there's a cheaper alternative that could to a better job. You buy a Leica to say you have a Leica.

[@ziggy149]

@@jmackultra Telling you - I kinda felt the same until I actually used one. This guy is making excuses.

[@jmackultra]

@@ziggy149 one day I may try one just so I can speak from my own experience. I'll buy it used and the resell it if I end up thinking it's not worth it

[@RaymondLay]

Thanks for the review. I like different opinions especially longer term reviews, it bypasses all of the hype that’s associated with a new product. I don’t have a Leica Q2 but I have been looking in the used market.

[@FormlessPhotography]

Good info. I was looking at one of those and this definitely helped. Prob will still rent one to play around with but you’re right, not worth the money for what I do. Maybe a collectors item sometime down the road. Already answered my new Z camera question in the comments below. Will look forward to those reviews/videos when they are shipped before purchase. Thanks and glad you and the family are doing well. Cheers

[@marvfrase119]

Your points were all valid, clear, brief and to the point, I enjoy your candid review!

[@wernertutsch8361]

to the point....referring to weddings with a Q2 is rather suggesting that he has no clue......

[@veriorama]

If you crop it is exactly the same with using a bigger focal length regarding the compression. The depth of field is bigger because you actually use a smaller focal length

[@solomonessix6909]

I love the form factor of the Leica Q2! (Small high performance body with an incredibly fast aperture, sharp compact lens) As a Z6II owner I an hoping there forthcoming 28mm & 40mm are competitive to the Q2’s lens. In anticipation of Nikon’s NEW compact Lens announcement I’ve been hoping off on 3rd party compact lens purchases. Hoping we see something soon.

[@LysanderLH]

I am looking for a really nice fixed lens digital. So let’s rule out the Q2, what is an available equivalent? I want the closest thing to the image quality of a Leica and simplicity. Can you please give me five equivalent cameras? GRiii? Open to suggestion here.

[@peterkaltoft8032]

Good to see you back!

[@einfussganger]

In fairness, the title should be "Thinking About Buying a LEICA Q2 (For Event Photography)? Here's Why It Didn't Work For Me."

[@Coldgecko]

Its a few years later -- I use a sony A7RIII -- which is an older A7R but its autofocus is industry leading -- so I get your point. I plan on getting an A1 or A7RIV. That said, the use-case for a Leica Q is not yours -- its street photography or adventure travel photography or portrait -- its a slower mode machine. BTW: A killer Sony A7R system is 85mb+ files -- no big deal in my experience and I've had that for almost 3 years now. If you are doing weddings, you need two cards; RAW and JPG or however you design your backup -- Q does not have that. With all that said -- I have a Q2 Mono and I love the feeling of minimalism -- if I am shooting in a faster situation or need reach or width (not fake crop) I would take my Sony. So its a fair review -- but your the wrong use-case.

[@alanmacmillan6957]

good vid. thanks. I've just pulled the trigger on getting a monochrom but I totally get what you are saying. when I've switched camera makes and models before you sometimes find the previous camera you were used to but thought you needed to upgrade from is actually better than the 'new'. I shoot a lot of film, mainly B&W so this suits my arty needs but we shall see.......

[@prue8400]

I have a Q2 and found your review fair and the points relevant for the work you do. I think the daylight performance of this camera is stunning and its the perfect travel companion. I am disappointed in the auto focus and low light performance where the auto focus noodles around before locking in. Fact is the iPhone Pro-Max blows everything else away in low light - I just wish it had more pixels.

[@invisiblekid99]

TBF all camera phones are good due to software which isn't the same thing and a printed picture will show them up. Look at the latest Pixel, one lens and it takes the best photos. In this day and age, most people will have both. I don't want multiple lenses, but I do have a phone, so if I have to use that? So be it. I cant justify the price of a Q2, but can get a Q-P 2nd hand.

[@inikphoto]

Totally agree with the crop, thank you! No one talks about the compression of the lens!,,,,! I do own the Q2 Monochrome tough, I do love it.

[@labradorhund7769]

The Q2 brought back the joy of photography to me. I love using it. And to me it’s more versatile than I originally thought. Don’t regret buying it at all. But, everybody’s different ...

[@mike_rzn]

likewise

[@happyforestgump1]

I though only dof changes with a different focal length. “Compression” is just an effect of perspective, no?

[@bharathghanta]

Yes. Compression only depends on your perspective or distance from your subject. It has nothing to do with focal length.

[@nicolaskrinis7614]

@@bharathghanta Will's got that one wrong too, it seems.

[@petersmyth8428]

I alway enjoy your videos and this year, March, for my retirement I wanted a good camera. After a lot of research my short list was the either the Leica Q2 or the Nikon Z6. However, they offer quite different propositions while being great cameras for the money. The Q2 is smaller and lighter and a great ¨travel¨camera to take with you everywhere. It has great optics but a fixed 28mm lenses. The 50M sensor gives you the option to crop covering effectively 28 to 56mm with at least the same resolution of the Z6. These are the lenses you say you use. However, I understand for what you do why you prefer the Z6 and clearly it is a better camera for you. In the end, I went for the Z6! For the same money I can get the Z6, the great 50mm f1.8, the 24 to 70mm F4, FTZ for my F mount 70 to 300mm zoom and a peak design tripod with change! That way I can try lots of different types of photography. However, it has taken me a lot of time to learn how to use the Z6 while the Leica would be easier. Ideally, I would have both!

[@shuzhenchen3341]

I have the exactly same experience as yours--choosing between Z6 and leica q2. In the end, I choose Z6, and I found Z6+35mm1.8s is also convenient to carry for traveling. 😊

[@allannoyes]

Isn't the Q2 a street camera not a wedding camera. I think the point of the Q2 is not for professional wedding/commercial work. I'm not trying to be sarcastic. I'm just confused why this guy thought this camera in any way would work for a wedding. Basically the Q2 is an expensive carry anywhere street camera. I would never use it for my commercial work unless I was somehow a paid art photographer.

[@dadisiolutosin4279]

I think you're comparing apples and oranges. You bought the wrong Leica for what you do. You should have purchased the Leica SL2 for wedding photography. The Leica Q system is really made for street and travel photography. Although I know of a number of professional photographers using the Q and the Q2 for paid gigs and it works well for them. Most of it is portraiture, not action. I think if you were to try the SL2 you'd really like that camera for your work. As for the price point, the cost of Leica cameras is the forever argument in the photography community. The one big difference between their cameras, especially their film cameras is that they hold value more than any other camera manufacturer on the market. Considering that the M6 which was made in 1984 can easily fetch $2K+ on eBay today. I'm considering picking up a used Q, not the Q2, for street and travel photography at some point but before I do that I will buy the Fujifilm GFX 50S so I can make some money to afford the Leica Q. LOL

[@Maxime-ho9iv]

Unfortunately the SL2 doesn’t have top notch autofocus either. I’ve tried it, it’s way slower than my a7rIII. Like it’s not even comparable. No matter how you look at it, Leica is just way behind the competition in terms of software. And our cameras are also software now, that’s just how it is. Don’t go on me like the classic Leica fan boy, I desperately want to get a Leica, optics are phenomenal, but I can’t sacrifice on all the progress we’ve made on Eye AF and all the stuff in the recent years.

[@DallasGreen123]

You can’t really compare an analog Leica M6 to digital Leicas, the Q1 for example almost dropped to 2K$ as well. They are also more prone to irreparable defects over long term.

[@carlosmozo5704]

I’d be curious to on your thoughts with a canon or Sony vs Nikon, because I don’t know a single person that shoots Nikon unless that are endorsing Nikon. I used to shoot Nikon years ago but found them over priced for what they offer. Like someone else also commented this is Apples and Oranges.

[@christroy8047]

Hey Will - good to see you buddy! Thanks for the Vid - great content as always. You're 100% bang on about the Leica's - as you say, they are great Cameras, but you are paying for the name. Comparing our Z6's to those is like comparing a Jet fighter (Say an F-22) aircraft to a classic Aircraft from World War 1 - yes, they are beautiful classic aircraft, and very expensive - but it won't do Mach 3 and push the envelope. All the best to you and yours - Chris from Canada

[@rigobertomorales6092]

Good information, thank you for explaining about 28-35-50-75, I understand that is cropping only not changing lenses.

[@michaellutherdavies]

Yes

[@gibsguitars]

A well fleshed out opinion a good assessment of pros and cons. I appreciate that. For me, this camera has been revolutionary and would recommend it for someone who has done their research and understand the capabilities and limitations of camera before purchasing. The images out of the Q2 are special in my opinion, beautifully soft and sharp at the same time and the colours are very calming to look at, hard to describe but for me looking at Leica images makes me feel calm and satisfied, so many other camera images feel digital and a bit jarring to look at. Thanks for the vid.

[@Dr.Kyriazidis]

Does the image quality and the feeling you describe also applies to the “cropped” images of different focal lengths?

[@gibsguitars]

@@Dr.Kyriazidis Yes absolutely. I crop most of my pictures and you’d be amazed how much cropping you can do with 47MP before you start feeling any loss of quality

[@Dr.Kyriazidis]

@@gibsguitars thank you a lot for taking the time to reply. Appreciate it.

[@GBB70]

I tested the Q2M for 30 days before returning it. Not having shot with the Q2, but the images you describe are the same for the Q2M. The cost of the Q2M was the reason for the return. In the mean time I purchased a used a7ii and will have it converted to a monochrome camera. I have seen images from the converted cameras plus I can use the primes I presently own. I suspect Leica will push out a SL2M in the future and I will be very interested in it. But I agree with the creamy sharpness vs the clinical razor sharp images from today's modern plastic lens on mirrorless bodies. Have fun with the Q2. It is as you say 'hard to describe'. Experiencing it with the Q2M I understand.

[@cesarm8811]

Great to see you back and doing well!!! Are you planning on purchasing the new Z6II and Z7II?

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Thanks Cesar! Yes we will start to rotate into the Z6ii’s on release. Will definitely be posting in depth reviews on them as well

[@FormlessPhotography]

WILL!!! MAIN MAN WILL BACK ON THE CHECK IN! Haven’t even watch yet. Tuning in now and comment after. Great to see ya back buddy

[@REMY.C.]

I found the Q2 to be interesting, and it's interesting to see that the same characteristics can be strengths for some and weaknesses for other. That's how you can make an educated choice.

[@michaelcarnes2087]

I have been using the Lexar 2933+ XQD cards since I got the D500 when it was released and use those cards in my Z6 and I have never had an issue with them.

[@NikCan66]

Will you venture into the Nikon z6 or z7 mark ii variants?

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

I think I will move to the mark ii yes. Will most likely cycle them in as my Zs creep towards 250k shutter clicks though

[@NikCan66]

@@TheMonochromeMemoirs I work in areas of action,sports and wildlife. I tried both the Z6 and Z7 cameras in such environments and was bitterly disappointed with crappy focus and tracking was inferior both in day and nighttime in covering sports live NFL,SOCCER,ICE HOCKEY 🏒 to my current Canon 1dx Mark iii and Nikon D6 cameras. The one slot was most worrisome item having no backup if a card was corrupted was an alarm bell for my needs. Interesting with the delayed Olympics which I will be in attendance if it still goes ahead. I think Nikon D6 and likewise the Canon 1dx Mark iii maybe the last made full frame professional DSLR cameras and maybe hurriedly replaced by professional mirrorless equivalent of the Canon 1dx Mark iii and Nikon D6 cameras. Japanese camera manufacturers don't want to lose face in their own country in not having a camera thats on par with their rivals is an important part that western people don't understand.

[@christroy8047]

@@NikCan66 Hi NikCan - I have no problems at all with the autofocus on my Z6 for sports or birds in flight. I have hundreds of tac sharp images of fast flying birds and I have zero problems with tracking humans doing sports. You just need to learn to use the camera effectively. I also have a D850 currently as well, and had a Sony A7 III for over a year then sold it. No problems with the autofocus at all with my Nikons - but with the Z series you do have to set them up correctly to get the most out of them.

[@NikCan66]

@@christroy8047 z6 a d z7 were set it up correctly and my colleague was with me had the same issues as myself. We both cant be wrong and we both went back to using our D5 & D6 cameras at both ice hockey and evening time a football match under floodlights.

[@christroy8047]

@@NikCan66 I totally understand that if you had a D5 & D6 in hand, I would use those as well! They are some of the best focusing Cameras bar none - they are on a different level - that would be a choice any pro would make given the option no doubt. Chris.

[@tashihishey34]

At 65 my only wish now is to buy a used Leica M10 and a used Leica 35mm Cron F2. I've seen the light.

[@NikCan66]

Great to see you back

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Much love

[@christroy8047]

I second that for sure - Will is a 1st class person as well, and a hell of a photographer ;)

[@punkrachmaninoff]

Almost took the leica CL, decided to go full frame and get the Nikon Z6 (or maybe Z6II) instead. Keeping my Fuji X-E3, selling the X-T3.

[@JLStreetDoc]

Thanks for the video. I’m definitely getting the q2, but I’m getting the q2M because I almost never shoot color. I’m done with choices. One camera, one lens, black and white, amazing quality. Nothing to think about but composition, light and emotion.

[@TheVFXbyArt]

Great video man… No Leica body experience other than in store use. Agreed that, with Leica, above the 25mp size, their processors lag. I can understand the Q2’s selling of a higher mp sensor for cropping, but Leica has to step up their processor game. Canon had to do the same with its mirrorless cameras too. The Leica sl2s is an example of a modern 25mp camera. A shout out to the fuji xt3…. It quadrupled the processing power but kept the mp the same, creating a very smooth operation that I enjoy to this day… no slowdowns!

[@jacobh5817]

From what I’m hearing you probably picked the Leica that is least useful for your requirements. You would have been much better of with the SL2 ;-) For my professional work I’m alternating between my H6D and the Z7II, but for personal work I use the M10 and the Q2 Monochrome. It helps me to slow down and carefully approach the scene. In fact I use manual focus even on the Q2M, which is perfect (most AF cameras suck at MF). I can understand your frustration with the Q2 because what you describe is exactly how the camera was designed. I shoot fashion and make-up portraits for a living and the Q2 would be the last camera that I would consider to take to work. Uhmm, next to perhaps the M although Benj Haisch makes it work in his wedding photography. I guess its all a matter of workflow ;-)

[@CryoftheProphet]

Not sure how you buy a q2 without running the scenario through your thought process prior to using it, I mean, you would think a SL2 or sl2s would be the obvious option for shooting leica with a wedding.. Or a Sony if you just wanted something that gets the job done and has all the features you need. Honestly, nikon? I know nikon has decent glass, but the cameras themselves are a bit behind the times..

[@MrNegroni]

A Leica Q2 for wedding photography? I hope you a took a few backups cameras and not just that lol.

[@smodjo]

Like it or not. Not worth making a video about your wrong decision. This camera is such a niche that people who buy it are totally informed about what it can or cannot. I use it for everything. Even weddings as my wide angle camera next to Sony A9 with marvelous Eye AF. For me, the perfect combo. For me, it's THE life documentary camera.

[@QCCliquePodcast]

Does anyone know of a more affordable alternative to the q2

[@akallias]

Sony a7c

[@keifer39]

Fujifilm x100v

[@aslipperysnake]

Nice video, funnily enough I think you kinda sold the original Q to me. You made some really good points about how 47mp being too much, especially since I don't crop that much anyways. I'm curious how you ended up with the Q2 and not the SL2 though.

[@aslipperysnake]

Also I'm a lazy editor so your points about color are useful too. Sometimes it's hard to trust some of the leica channels because they fanboy a bit too much, so it's nice to hear a non-leica user talk about one.

[@davidlang5319]

Would love your take on the Nikon 28mm 1.4E

[@fabriziobuscaini5914]

If I were you I would evaluate Greg Williams videos using the Q for taking amazing celebrity shots. I respect your opinion but think the Q offers amazing quality if you know what you are doing and what needs to be set ahead of a shooting.

[@mgml]

I have a Q2 plus other top notch DSLRs. The Q2 is an absolute pleasure to use for some types of shooting, for others it's just not suited. You seem a pretty knowledgeable shooter and I'm surprised you tried to shoot weddings with it. btw, It''s not slow, it's fast, but not dslr fast. You were using the Q2 precisely for the stuff it's not suited for.

[@LeicaGeek]

I had a similar experience with the Q2. It’s a camera you can’t really use for most work situations. It’s really a great fun camera to use, but when you’re being paid for a job the Q2 isn’t that kind of camera. The odd thing is I still miss it.

[@Fleet42]

What kind of work do you do?

[@ianbrown704]

I totally agree. I had a Q2 and after a few weeks felt I had bought a luxury "point and shoot" it just didn't "feel" special for the price. I like the "Leica" feel but the Q2 was just another main stream camera and I didn't use it professionally. I have since bought a Leica M10 and a couple of lenses, which to me is a "real" Leica. That said I would still use a top DSLR or say Nikon Z7 if I was doing paid stuff. Great overview and explanations, many Leica fans may not agree!!!!!

[@invisiblekid99]

And how much did that M10 and a few lenses cost you? the Q's are not trying to be the same thing. The M10, is always going to be the "Legendary" Leica M10

[@sidneykincaid851]

William, it’s great to see you again! Welcome back! Again, you have posted another great video that gives us all a knowledgeable insider look into a piece of gear that people like myself often wonder what is the big difference between this expensive, exclusive piece of hardware and something that most people can more easily afford. Thank you as always for your excellent insight bro, hopefully you have some more videos on the way. You, Sara, and the kids be safe brother!

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Thanks so much my man!

[@bushbeatnik4480]

What were you thinking bro? LOL ya might as well have tried a 4x5 for what you do. I like Nikon color science for landscapes, Canon for skin, Leica for both. The Q2 is an amazing piece of kit and the 28 Lux not Cron as you said is a great lens but the design brief on this camera does not match your implementation. Price is not a variable of usefulness across all context. I love the M system so even “slower” if not zone focusing but would I use it if I shot weddings? I don’t shoot weddings. How many good wedding shooters, like yourself, run Leica Q or M? I have found like 5 on the platforms so that percentage is for reason. Next time ya go shoot hoops, don’t pack the golf cleats. Sorry ya got sucked in by that sexy red dot, that then gets covered with gaffers tape!

[@GillesQuennevilleGQ]

Not a camera for everyone. But I love it.

[@ummyhorse7791]

It’s good but slow and expensive so decided to lose 50% getting rid of it!

[@chloescanlon1107]

No you didn’t.

[@ummyhorse7791]

@@chloescanlon1107 🤣 That’s what “HE” basically said!

[@adventureStaley]

I agree with everything you said. And the Q2 is my all time favorite digital camera. Art is strange...

[@kindface]

He wouldn’t understand. He has no time for art; he’s too busy making a living. Just wished he’d remembered that before he went and bought the Q2 impulsively and then rant about it.

[@chirag4]

in January, i bought M10-P *white* limited edition + 50mm f/1.4 Summilux + 1.4x VF Magnifier. Your name contains the term "monochrome" & I'd love to have a M10-M + 28mm summilux or summicron. Thanks for your honest & fair opinion of the Q2 .... much appreciated ... Regards from India

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Thanks for watching my friend

[@malachimovies]

Thanks. The argument that it slows you down and think about the process strikes me as spurious; as if you would pay more money for a bike without gears so that you could appreciate how much work your legs do.

[@GearZenChannel]

It’s called a fixed gear bike. They are a thing.

[@ron5935]

Why buy any camera without interchangeable lens? And 28 mm on top of that. Put a 28 on a M and you are more versatile for later.

[@absonus]

A point about the crop facility .It is meant to emulate the framelines in an RF . Leica shooters like to see what is coming into the frame .so it more than just a way of implementing a crop. I use Leica M bodies but I don`t find any value in that way of seeing and like you ,if I want to crop, I`ll crop after in post but that isn`t the only reason leica have chosen to include this functionality in the way which they have . I don`t have a Q but wouldn`t have thought the camera would not be suitable for weddings . I use Leica , Canon and Sony and all have their plus points but over all I prefer using the Leica cameras for the reasons which you`ve outlined in your video .

[@obscur_yoann]

Not interested by the Q2... just passing by to say hi and happy to see you are back on tracks with your weddings work and videos. 😉👍

[@lrb05131963]

I shoot sports and portraits and landscape with my Leica Q2M ,it’s a great camera plus the macro is awesome

[@denishennessy5192]

Stoked for the z6ii?

[@TheMonochromeMemoirs]

Can’t WAIT

[@ashershaham]

very interesting point of view, the situation with the Leica Dlux 7 is even worse; terribly complicated menu, I regret buying it

[@frankwieczorek5112]

I'll wait for the Q2s with 24MP:)

[@felm.974]

I'm happy with my Nikon Z6 :) and waiting for the II

[@michapiotrstankiewicz1504]

Most people I know who uses Leica uses film cameras and they love it. Not even single digital user.

[@DavidTothill]

This video was like comfort food for me. Yes, I’ve seen all the hype and yes I’ve thought Oooo what must it be like to shoot a Q2 ??? Which of course I couldn’t possibly afford or justify. I love your no Bullshit way of talking and explaining. Now I’m gonna go and stroke my Z6 and tell her I love her.

[@nicolaskrinis7614]

Exactly, which is why Will sold it.

[@johnguillory7759]

Would someone please comment on the AF performance with the latest firmware update as of this posting? Is AF faster than Mono Memoirs reports? I've read the firmware improvements that says it can AF+touch capture: is this nearly instantaneous? My canon GX7 miii does this instantly. Want the same in a $5000 camera. Thanks.

[@kjhardy3254]

Shout out to the " fuck you money crew" !!!great review, raw but honest ;)

[@adnmultimedia]

What about a used wonr for 3500?