This 16-Lens Camera Is a Threat to DSLRs

[@snazzy]

Thanks for teaching me that the megapixel rating is the only thing that matters in a camera. Cheers.

[@AldinPereira]

Snazzy Labs lol

[@petrucciguy199]

Love your channel man!

[@jeffhampton7405]

Snazzy Labs No matter how many times you try to explain how far down the list megapixels are in terms of image quality, people just refuse to believe it.

[@xiuxiu1108]

Snazzy Labs MP count is important for level of detail though

[@Written_in_the_Starss]

nope.... ppi and lense sensor is more important

[@AnxiousEducator]

"It can take this, this....and even this" *shows incredibly blurry and noisy close up of bridge*

[@mcp12300]

Jarrod Moore that blindness is what really made me laugh.

[@ReZShot]

Haha I laughed!!

[@youtubeaddict-1868]

All photos have noise and loss in detail when zoomed in at 100%.

[@aliessa9470]

Your phone can't do that

[@0ooTheMAXXoo0]

Yes photos look more blurry at sizes where you can see the pixels. This looks worse than a larger sensor camera though. In full daylight this new camera looks like a larger sensor shooting in very low light conditions. And the pixels do have that shimmering look that small photosites produce due to diffraction so even shown zoomed out, it has a more digital look than larger sensor sites produce.

[@sypialnia_studio]

As it turned out, this was not a threat to DSLR industry.

[@CSnrgy]

😂

[@IntegraDIY]

I thought this video was gonna be a joke by looking at the thumbnail

[@azophi]

Same lol

[@nifek7146]

Same

[@scarredgaruga]

It's not?

[@3dick794]

It is a joke

[@neondestruction5544]

Yeah,I also thought

[@SahanTheMighty]

"Okay, look into the lens and smile"... Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrr... 👀👁👀👁👀👁👀👁👀👀👀👁👀👁👁👁👀👁👀👁👀👀👁👀👁👁👀👀👁👀👀👁👀👁👀👀👁👀👁👁👀👁👁👀👁👀👀👁👀👁👁👀👀👁👀👁👀👀👀👁👀👁👀👁

[@narata1541]

SahanTheMighty LOL, your comment freaked me out and made me laugh. :-D

[@clivrn]

You came from SciShow?

[@gromsquid-deanthepirate2276]

Perfect.. seen your comment and laughed out loud in public.

[@SahanTheMighty]

You're welcome :)

[@aehlnr]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Jamesfrancosdog]

"This 16 lens camera is a threat to DSLRs" *No, it's not.*

[@polygorg]

yeah pretty sure it isnt

[@jub8891]

its a threat to my trypophobia tho

[@thatidiot8038]

@@jub8891 😐🙂😀😃😄😁😆😅🤣🙃😂

[@UselessDuckCompany]

It's a very advanced point and shoot but I don't think the ISO performance could be improved much. This would be a terrible camera for low light, and how the heck will it do video... megapixels are not everything. Still it's a fascinating gadget.

[@Wynner3]

I wonder about battery performance. How many shots can you really get before the battery dies? Does it have a removable battery?

[@fartonaut2291]

Your channel has gotten too clickbaity for me.

[@RetchEinhundert]

This camera could take the multiple images with much ISO noise and combine them to get a noise reduced result. You can so the same with every other camera, Just take a few pictures at high iso and then combine them. But i think i would prefer a dslr.

[@UselessDuckCompany]

My channel? But every video has what the title describes. I don't think that's bait.

[@sparrow40k]

Would be interesting if Samsung, HTC, or other players made this concept into a phone.

[@kashif7708]

That thumbnail looks like the phone has developed tumor

[@oliverriezebos]

Kashif ! 😂

[@DonatoXlll]

"it's not a tumahhh"

[@devileyegaming5116]

Hit by 16 bullet

[@A.TechMotors]

😂😁😀😁

[@leoshork]

Yeah I thought it was Photoshop

[@hnng1439]

This 16-lens camera is also a threat to trigophopic people.

[@ojmardueno]

Triceratops....

[@akeiai]

Triteriaop

[@txnyaverma]

Traingle

[@akeiai]

Traemouer

[@totallyfrozen]

palitsa Trypophobic.

[@flykope9211]

1:15 This dudes rhymes are fire. 🔥 🔥 🔥

[@Roblem19]

but im not a rapper

[@happycat143]

lol

[@ordinaryguy6654]

lol

[@liammay7756]

lol

[@adwye7]

lol

[@sammchargue8835]

Now make one with 16 dslr's

[@antimageantimage3424]

Sam McHargue ok

[@well3034]

yass

[@humandroid53]

Its been done

[@c0nstantin86]

perfect comment for this!!!! :))))

[@Zebus112]

And put it in your pocket

[@faysus]

"Just look at the camera and smile." *Tries to look at all cameras at once*

[@skanrd]

Trypophobia intensifies.

[@TheDJMeyer85]

Haha my thoughts too

[@ThonREvolAlEiN]

Exactly

[@KiidTraviieBroo]

My exact thoughts

[@RealNameNeverUsed]

OCD intensifies... the random arrangement of lenses.

[@AidanFarren-Hart]

Same, man! 🤢

[@Jericho07]

I don't know why I feel extremely disturbed by those lenses.

[@virtualfroggy]

Depressed Gamer trypophobia

[@theawardgoesto1]

Daejan Gaming BINGO... ughh

[@ingridayarza]

Daejan Gaming YES. Disgusting!

[@shadowboxing1729]

Little eyes looking at you? 👽

[@Princeton_James]

Because its ugly as fuh...

[@ertugruldemirhan1381]

*Had to check if it was an Onion video...*

[@JBlooey]

The Onion ate us!

[@Enderman-uu5oq]

Same

[@-grey]

why is this filmed and written like a parody about terrible kickstarter campaigns?

[@dansuper6103]

Cassius Grey because it is

[@theapeshitmonkey]

I thought it was fake for a good minuite lmao

[@robertstevens7718]

Cassius Grey has

[@eyesofphysics97]

1. If you lose pixel count when zooming, it isn't optical zoom. 2. The pixel count is hardly the most important thing in a good camera. 3. The graininess in low light isn't all software, that's the iso being cranked up very high due to the low light collecting ability, which is due to the tiny sensors. Same problem in phone cameras. This along with optical zoom and the ability to see the shot before capturing through mirrors (not on a display) is why photographers carry around "bulky" cameras.

[@Amorel86]

1:47 WALLAH, a beautiful portrait😂

[@evenessa]

The random arrangement of the lenses makes me very uncomfortable,😒😒😒

[@totallyfrozen]

VenessA en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trypophobia

[@FullOilBarrel]

Not rabdom

[@shudhsangeet1657]

you are trypophobic

[@thewalk-naturalwalkingexpe8308]

Me too,, freakin Triphopobia

[@marcuslen24]

Its prob not random cuz of the lighting or depth, idk but it does annoy my minor OCD

[@Cozmito]

ahhhhhhhh i dont think poor low light performance and slow shutter speeds are a software issue..

[@toprakcemsavas3132]

Notmitch Cozzi right? I lost it on that point

[@keepitlit1518]

It's probably the algorithm of combining images.

[@momontiego8705]

Yea, great bs about that. Low quality sensors make low light performance and other issues.

[@xirtax]

How many cameras do you want? Light: *Yes.*

[@shebazkhan13]

I thought its a parody.

[@seivyjk]

same here *_*

[@sheiladelarosa_]

Me too

[@sidbrun_]

Same, friend linked me to some fb vid and I thought they were taking the piss out of dual camera systems

[@koriv6329]

shebaz khan i knew i wasnt the only one

[@ledermarton]

Wait what. It isn't? I'm confused lol. Than why on earth does it look so retarded?

[@KirkHMiller]

You said that it is optical zoom but if you zoom in it drops to 13MP... isn't that Digital Zoom (crop zoom) not Optical Zoom?

[@emrys9547]

It's not zoom at all. That's like saying switching out a fixed lens for a different one is optical zoom. It's not. It's just cropping, otherwise the pixel count would be higher than just one sensor.

[@AkshaySinghJamwal]

It's probably interpolating the images from only the telephoto lenses by necessity, so no, doesn't have to be.

[@rredureis]

It's not digital zoom, what happens is when you "zoom" to 150mm only the "most telephoto" lens capture the image, and I suppose it's attached to a 13mp sensor, probably out of a smartphone

[@emrys9547]

It's funny how bad this design is, really, since you can either never use all the sensors, leaving you with a bad quality image, or you'll have to stitch all the pictures together, which is just a straight up bad idea. Also, I can only imagine how awfully this thing works in low light with such tiny sensors.

[@jamesbrooks9321]

man crazy how it's been 5 years since DSLRs went out of existence

[@arunsp767]

Megapixels ≠ Good Camera When will people learn?

[@jurciks71]

no

[@ADoughtyPhotography]

So so wrong, pixel density is more important

[@AG.Floats]

In some sort yes but mega pixels isn't the only factor of what makes a camera great

[@thornclawofwarriors]

Ok guys, != Means "does not equal" The guy is right.

[@arunsp767]

Nicholas Tong Oh gosh, yeah! I meant 'not equal'

[@dtb6456]

The low light performance of 16 small sensors won't match a 1 huge DSLR sensor.

[@z0rr0rr0r]

DT B why ?

[@alexgratzaTV]

Because way more light can fall into a big lense than into several small ones

[@stevess7777]

+z0rr0rr0r Physics. You can't defy it.

[@potatotechp6217]

.. If laid out properly. It can. But you would have to use very fewer megapixels over every 1/3inh sensor. Something around the ball park of 2megapixels or 1megapixel per sensor to get a near DSLR quality or atleast a near m4/3 quality at least :) . Or you would have to use a very advanced pixel binning or super sampling algorithms. (Like the ones Nokia used, or if possible.. better ones than Nokia used.)

[@mariushagelskjr5452]

Actually it gives sense since the higher resolution gives less light so if this camera takes a lot of low res pictures and combine them into 1 decent resolution image the low light performance would be similar to a normal DSLR camera but except from that the camera still wouldn't be able to get bokeh unless of course they just fake it

[@supremeturtle4620]

"Look at the camera! " *UM*

[@nothing4922]

Fermuso • 27 years ago all of them!!

[@SahanTheMighty]

All those lenses look like little eyes and it make me feel queasy 😕

[@SahanTheMighty]

imthebadass bro Hahahaha ewwww. I had to look it up and Google images made me giddy and queasy 😐😕😐😕😐😕😐😕😐🙈

[@humanshieldz]

Normally i just light up stuff like that and watch it burn lol queasy to satisfaction :P

[@KingAlphaOmega]

Ya Spider eyes, very creepy

[@SahanTheMighty]

You hold it up to take a photo and people faint

[@RobDymott]

SahanTheMighty yeah man freakkyyy

[@funny-video-YouTube-channel]

*Perfect phone camera.* For anything professional, we would still need manual zoom. Video without the zoom is not as good as with the zoom action.

[@astroash]

It's been a year, and I still don't see photographers carrying a mutant camera phone.

[@bobdabuilder2424]

lol

[@kevingumfory]

Lol. Photographers think they are artists lol they're capable of anything

[@77prominer77]

I swear to God I thought this was satire

[@fallenslave6684]

FuzzyWuzzyHadHair Look here you , God forbids swearing! Read Matthew 5 and never use tje name of God in vain.

[@guneetsingh9455]

Same

[@cloroxbeach647]

FuzzyWuzzyHadHair Then you're a dumbfuck.

[@sniuchi2549]

This is sooo 2006 when megapixel count was the thing

[@steyn1775]

it still is for modern phone

[@golljoll]

nah, all phone cameras have enough megapixels these days. The optics and sensor size on the other hand...

[@AnonVoids]

Nah, it's much more about focus, color quality, etc

[@rogerb5615]

Megapixels are still a "thing". Why do you think so many pro landscape photographers use full-frame and medium format DSLRs instead of crop-sensor cameras?

[@sniuchi2549]

SafeSpace47 yes for landscapes and when you need huge prints. But lets take an example,Nikon has pro and a semi pro dslr cameras. This is the list of the pro flagship cameras from the firs digital one, 1999 nikon d1 2.7mpx 2003 nikon d2h 4.1mpx 2004 nikon d2x 12mpx 2006 nimon d2xs 12mpx 2009 nikon d3s 12mpx 2012 nikon d4 16mpx 2016 nikon d5 20mpx So in 2016 nikon has 20mpx on their 5k dollar flagship camera,while the semi-pro the d850 has 46mpx,but people are taking wedding pictures at 40.000iso on the d5 whit very low noise and has 200 pics raw buffer 12bit.

[@Zarrar-Malik]

When someone says: LOOK AT THE CAMERA!!! You: UM???👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀👁️👀

[@AF911vids]

Who else thought it was clickbait

[@Tuxedosam.]

Afham mk it is click bait

[@okkid7311]

@@Tuxedosam. yeah cuz how is a smartphone with some sort of strange disease gonna be a threat to DSLRs

[@bazsarov]

@@Tuxedosam. nope

[@Tuxedosam.]

@@bazsarov it is clickbait yea its a camera with 16 lenses but if you have seen the quality of those photos you will see that it is in no way a "threat to DSLR" even in the video it seemed like the guy is touting that noisy zoomed in photo of the cars on the golden gate bridge as something spectacular and its not just that picture tons of pictures online that you can see where fine details just look so crappy (not because of user error)

[@bazsarov]

@@Tuxedosam. ohhhhh i didn't know you are talking about that

[@keziagrasia2186]

i think for people has trypophobia can not have this camera, it's really disgustingly

[@Monomonmamon]

Kezia Grasia I don't have trypophobia but everytime I see the camera placements my whole body gets goosebumps

[@dansuper6103]

Christian Enmon ikr

[@josephnevin]

If their trypophobia won't, their OCD sure will.

[@24ecko]

people need to stop being pussies.

[@yqr5357]

It’s been a year since this video was uploaded. Needless to say, no DSLRs were harmed so far

[@Nomamegoogle]

3 years now and Phone are like that camera.

[@Gamehighlight2023]

@@Nomamegoogle still, they aren't capable of using all the cameras in the same time.....and L16 takes better pictures than Samsung Galaxy S24 ULTRA@100MPix.

[@djaydeved]

this cant replace a dslr because a dslr has interchangable lenses you can get a macro shot a wde shot or any shot you want even using big lenses

[@jeremygrecte]

djay4487 deved On this camera you don't need to change lens, you get all the macro and wide angle features combined in one single shot.

[@batprime9560]

Can it take pictures of cheeta running top speed humming bird flapping it's wings no cellphone can do that I doubt this camera can do it

[@alexlevy9828]

Even if you didn’t want to swap out the lenses on a dslr you could still buy something like a Tamron 18-400 or a Nikon 18-300 f/3.5-5.6

[@djaydeved]

wow 77 likes? wow

[@andrewrobertson6435]

Did you even watch the video?

[@LasVegar]

Omg its a spidercam

[@King-ui8gz]

Quality didn't depends on megapixel, megapixels is all about size, I am lagandary d700 n it's only 12 megapixel but it's quality it's awesome, professional photography it's all about mannual setting, low light quality, shutters speed, replacement of DSLR not easy task..

[@KevinRawbay]

indeed, i have Canon EOS 1300D. But MP has nothing to do rather than sensor size.

[@MrDoyle2]

Size of sensor depends buddy

[@OninDynamics]

Vikrant Tumbade And only that. Not MP Count... Huh...

[@MrDoyle2]

Onin dynamics Dude megapixels doesn't matter if the sensor is big, 2mp pixel camera can too take awesome pic with big sensors, but yep mp do matter 😛 but biggest reason behind pixels of pic is sensor

[@yongquanwu3921]

This trypophobic camera competes with multiple tiny sensors, not just megapixel. Though it probably take years more to kill non full frame DSLRs.

[@saugatmaharjan5121]

Kai can make such a parody of this

[@iamax8307]

Haha.. He'd go savage

[@stevess7777]

Yes please!

[@suzukigixxer1627]

Saugat Maharjan Fellow Newa😁

[@Shreecools]

And this was in my mind... Kai is one hella DSLR fanboy...😁🤣 But nowadays he's using a lot of mirrorless though..

[@saugatmaharjan5121]

Shreerag G he uses whatever he finds good it doesnt need to be a dslr

[@sayyedzarrar]

Probably using dslr to made this video.. 🌚

[@AnonVoids]

Sayyed Zarrar lol true

[@fallenslave6684]

Sayyed Zarrar hey search on youtube for David Wood

[@onisensei3415]

haha nailed it

[@fallenslave6684]

Patrick Colin I cannot find a braver man and honest man like Him!

[@patrickcolin7073]

fallenSlave Try opening your eyes

[@swugger]

light camera: exists P30 Pro: Hold my beer

[@jonathanwang6097]

Lol true

[@Yayaytree]

For those out there Megapixels don't mean everything. The Nokia Lumia 1030 had a 50mp camera

[@IszyIzzy]

It was 30😊

[@Yayaytree]

My bad but none the less my point stands

[@Boogfuardan]

TheNotSoAvid I looked it up, (still agree megapixels aren't everything) the 1030 wasn't released, they cancelled it.

[@KevinRawbay]

The only thing we need to check is sensor size and not MP. There 2 type of sensor. Crop sensor and Full Frame.

[@thenotsookayguy]

@@KevinRawbay and Medium Format, also if ya mean crop as in just APS-C sensors :))))) There's also Micro 4/3, 1 inch, 1/2.55 inch etc etc.

[@burodadu9434]

thumbnail looks like a smartphone back shattered by 16 bullets ...

[@desi_bhai_]

It's a 52 mp camera, yes man, we have had 108mp camera in 2020 and now 200mp in future

[@c6786]

The arrangement of those lenses are killing me, i must be suffering from OCD

[@zaethebarber9250]

Right on point ! :))

[@xaytana]

All of the lenses use folded optics, and the way the modules are set is actually quite compact. On the outside it looks like an ocd nightmare, but on the inside it's not as bad.

[@user-dx8br5vb3n]

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder is a _chronic_ and _long-lasting_ disorder in which a person has uncontrollable, reoccurring thoughts and behaviors compulsions that they feels the urge to repeat over and over. You don't have OCD, you just like things to be orderly. Most people like things to be in order.

[@cloroxbeach647]

c6786 It's algorithmic, they designed it that way to aid the atmospheric correction, it is actually quite neatly organized on the inside.

[@HUELESACHETOS]

Is this some kind of infomercial?...

[@ElisPalace]

HUELESACHETOS tired of your old bulky dslr? ( black and white footage of someone making a dslr look hard to carry ). Introducing the new 16 lens super portable camera it even fits under your bed ( 4K footage of someone smiling using the camera )

[@WanderingRogue1]

HUELESACHETOS he also criticised it, so no.

[@BrennanHouran]

No it’s just the Wall Street Journal

[@khosrow]

I am certain it is one because no serious camera vlog would use MP comparisons like that.

[@budthecyborg4575]

WSJ is nothing but clickbait now, they way they operate now is really no better than the classic tabloids.

[@khalidhebshi5318]

Nothing, I repeat, NOTHING Can replace DSLRs and Mirroless cameras that are made for photography

[@pratikmadrecha]

Feeling trypophobic looking at this

[@arnabsaha8761]

Pratik Madrecha haha

[@Arduinerd]

Same! I can’t hang.

[@RobDymott]

Pratik Madrecha that’s when you’re scared of holes? Because if it is, me too.

[@owenchuarbx]

I'm fine with that

[@PapaWheelie1]

Pratik Madrecha - gives me the creeps just looking at it

[@oldm8alfie]

This 16-Lens Camera Is a Threat to people who cant use DSLRs

[@cloroxbeach647]

OldM8Alfie I am very confused by your comment, yet at the same time intrigued.

[@robertmueller6979]

bingo

[@amielterence]

Clorox Beach there’s a lot more to taking pictures than just taking a shot of something that looks good. There’s theory behind it. A good of understanding of the relationships between lighting, composition, fore,mid and background elements and colour theory will naturally make you take better looking pictures. The people who know how to use DSLRs properly can understand how, why and when to use the many features of the camera because they already have an understanding of how those features interlink with that theory. Any old dude can spend a lot of money on a really good camera (like that 5D) and think the better the camera, the better the picture. That’s not the case however.

[@SMAr2wo]

best argument ever! thumb up!

[@OnnieKoski]

Woof. It’s like Light abandoned the L16 immediately.

[@pcaires]

The real question is: is the camera racist?

[@siyacer]

Could the lenses at least be organized? The trypophobia is too much.

[@Rubysh88]

im sure the randomness actually helps since it "overlaps" and removes the pixel grids of each sensor when combining pictures

[@Br4nchy28]

@Gavin My brother actually did all of the testing and R&D during the manufacturing process and you're wrong, Unless the sensors were placed too far away or too close to one another; where they actually laid the sensors (Whether it be in a grid like rectangular pattern or completely randomized) had close to no effect on the outcome of the final images. Also people on the internet like to lie and it's really easy to do.

[@encalica853]

@@Br4nchy28 you're both wrong, my great grandmother discovered this camera in a goldmine back in 1978, the year she was exploring Africa. The random arrangement of lenses is due to the way that of you throw a triangle out of a moving car at 43mph, it will bounce in a pattern very similar to the position of the lenses.

[@thundercats5603]

@@encalica853 you'll 3 are wrong ... I went back in time in my time machine it was 🤔 1920. I brought this camera which I baught in 2019 to test it.. sadly I droped it .. hmm seems finders keepers.

[@phenyos5914]

@@thundercats5603 wrong I designed this, I just closed my eyes and pointed randomly on the camera and that was where a lens would be.

[@mellow2979]

Thought it was a bulletproof phone 😂

[@gpcaraudio]

It's like it's a advertisement or something 🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊🔊

[@SylasTheGreat]

www.GPcarAudio.com an* you and 246 other people are incompetent English writers...

[@jerryknudsen7898]

Or the message is significantly more understood and accepted by, as of now, 304 accounts than the petty need for grammatical accuracy and competency for a single language while browsing the internet, a multilingual digital space most users of are accustomed to broken translations in forums, websites, and even KZbin.

[@jerryknudsen7898]

Ken not exactly. The grammatically incorrect portion of it wasn't in it's length, which was extended by in depth descriptions but not expressing two separate thoughts. The grammatically incorrect portion of that response was starting it with "or" which would not be acceptable, unless in the context of quotations. Behave troll.

[@jerryknudsen7898]

Ken "it's" will always be auto corrected by Android, you started a sentence with "lol" in a debate of English, and the statement outside of the incorrect use of preposition I kindly pointed out, would hold in an academic paper. Perhaps loosesly describable as a run on sentence, but not two separate thoughts. Was the message incomprehensible or did it just allude you? This entire discussion leads me to believe the latter.

[@jerryknudsen7898]

Ken allude is to vaguely hint to, or direct towards without having directly saying. Did my text allude? Was it not direct enough. The fact you haven't once replied to what was said perhaps leads me to believe I wasn't direct enough. There has not been a single published work in English, written on a phones keyboard, especially not to a troublesome time waster on a social media website in human history. Not to a book, nor magazine. So what has been destroyed? Nevermind that, this argument exists because you cannot read or do not listen

[@AdrianTache]

You're joking, right? I mean this ad is just plain wrong. A full frame sensor has many reasons why it outperforms a small, phone sized sensor, or else full frame sensors would have just as many megapixels. Have a read about the megapixel race and why a phone and a pro dslr have about the same resolution, but with very different results. This abomination just digitally stitches different points of view of poor quality lenses at different angles, but solves nothing of the disadvantages of the individual cameras.

[@ThankYouPageMagic]

And you're talking like an expert yet you don't understand the underlying technology. It works. Spend some time learning on light's site.

[@hugh6025]

Mitch Aunger Yes, im sure the company that made it won't be even slightly biased.

[@Arduinerd]

Mitch Aunger Will this take higher quality photos than a full frame DSLR?

[@AnonymousUser77254]

Adrian Tache I agree with you, however, I still find this quite interesting. It's collecting a lot more data than a DSLR lending it some more AI potential.

[@stevess7777]

+Adrian Tache Same here! It's the "DSLR killer" marketing attitude!

[@donutjonut2872]

I dont think that is is a threat. the reason people will still buy dslrs is because they want more customisability and manual control, not a albiet very good point and shoot

[@vijaybhaskar_25]

But it got more lenses .. 15 of them..

[@donutjonut2872]

but do you still have lots of manual control? What I'm saying is that profesionals wont be useing this because dslrs still have more custoomisability

[@vijaybhaskar_25]

Am being funny and sarcastic. If people want portable camera then they already have RX 100 or iPhone or huawei

[@TheJudge064]

And it fails at that too.

[@nathraxx]

Lol as soon as you started talking about megapixels I knew for sure you had no clue what you were talking about. No matter how many tiny sensors you've got you still can't come close to the performance of a 35mm sensor... Basic physics yo

[@EdmontonRails]

Those optics couldn't get close to 52MP sharpness.

[@orionarclight]

That phone can't even beat the current flagship smartphones....

[@thijsbakker0103]

Noah S. mp isnt any indicator of quality

[@cloroxbeach647]

Ben Dover Its not a phone dumbass.

[@cloroxbeach647]

Pete Dews Actually this is far better, it captures depth and does 5 layer exposure bracketing on every single pixel, as well as automatic atmospheric correction and color correction.

[@bluemeannie]

I wouldn't be able to smile at the camera without getting triggered by triphobia!

[@imdeadserious6102]

Bluemeannie not a real phobia. It just looks similar to things that are nasty or unsettling.

[@SpicyLatino]

You don't have tripophobia. Stop with the self diagnosis

[@parabebe2499]

Trypophobia*

[@onee]

Bluemeannie That camera didn't trigger my triphobia. The holes have to be much smaller, and closes to each other.

[@DejaMiru]

thought i was the only one.. (i dont care what you call it, its gross)

[@zardoz2627]

An array of sensors/lense does make sense to solve certain problems. I could see a bunch of smaller lenses surrounding 1 main interchangeable lens working out very well

[@blaxland64]

Optical zoom reduces file size? Sounds like you are cropping not zooming ....

[@90AlmostFamous]

half of the lenses are wide angle half are telephoto, so its possible only telephoto are being used while zoomed in

[@avinashrai11141]

Bx Yeah it is like cropping but optical crop and camera refocus after capture by using sharp images from few wide angle cameras and using smart algorithm of blending all the images from different sensor into one final output image. Sounds good but practically resolution of image depends upon distance of subject from the camera.

[@_____-ze5ow]

true mate

[@ThankYouPageMagic]

Since you're all making HUGE assumptions based on inaccurate data, here's the facts on why the resolution is variable: support.light.co/l16-photography/explained-variable-resolution

[@ThankYouPageMagic]

+90almostfamous please read: support.light.co/l16-photography/explained-variable-resolution so you know what the heck you're talking about instead of making false assumptions

[@wickedleeloopy2115]

I want a camera with 79 lenses. 😒 I'm so dissatisfied.

[@wigglywigglywally]

Was that microaggression?!

[@allahrakha1441]

BassBomb

[@ranaumer8999]

Story

[@stoplayin21]

This 16 lens camera is a threat to one eye of a fly.

[@TimberWulfIsHere]

Looks as if someone accidently spilled camera lenses on a peice of metal.

[@dominicksantora1574]

Try taking a picture of a eagle in flight with that contraption. Let me know how it turns out.

[@BadassBobY]

1:01 Nowadays, Most Budget

[@dickhorner]

This guy needs to learn what "optical zoom" means. Optical zooming doesn't affect the megapixels of the image.

[@lylestavast7652]

it does when you subtract the sub-images from the wide angle lens sensors you excluded by zoominb. These images are created from individual lenses and stitched together.

[@Alex-zc8ds]

It does.. when you do digital zoom..its like you are cropping the picture to a smaller pixel dimension.. unlike the mechanical zooming that dslr do dslr may maintain its original pixel the lenses do the zooming thus its not affecting the overall pixel size.

[@rrm1903]

I think youre the one who needs to learn a thing or two here

[@KevinRawbay]

www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=www.dummies.com/photography/digital-photography/the-difference-between-optical-zoom-and-digital-zoom-on-your-digital-camera/&ved=2ahUKEwi3k9qZg6jdAhVFMY8KHQh4DFEQFjAAegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw24zFjAS30rjuw3Y1rW6dpe

[@KangJangkrik]

Hopefully it's not a trap link, thanks!

[@adixar]

Omg, camera placements, makes me anxious.

[@angelherg1997]

It could mean you're trypophobic. WARNING: Google at your own risk!!!

[@lucretius8050]

I think people who are OCD probably would hate the disorderly placement as well.

[@ElGaby323]

3 years later, the S21 Ultra with 100x zoom and 108 mp

[@sudipchatterjee]

No, I don't agree with that theory which states that many little lenses can replace one big lens. If defies optics.

[@stevess7777]

Sensor size matters.

[@herranton]

You would need over 50 smart phone sensors to equal the size of a full frame sensor...

[@ThankYouPageMagic]

none of you understand the technology to be making those statements. lightrumors.co/2017/05/06/gathering-light/ = 1 hour long - watch in 2x if you want to zip thru it, but all is explained

[@aneesmehmood3642]

Ask a girl and she will tell you the same, many little things cannot replace one BIG once..

[@stevess7777]

+Anees Mehmood haha!

[@yatinyash94]

But what is the DxO Mark of this camera?

[@pnwood0]

Whatever you pay them

[@ItumelengS]

MKBHD

[@alekhug4609]

108/100

[@lattice.d]

Yatin Jethi 99, they will never give 100.

[@willplaya9972]

Dark Mystery they have given above 100

[@hyesooksong3956]

Engineer: How many cameras do you want? Canon: Yes.

[@prabhatbhandari]

Trypophobia.

[@crumpetblogs1030]

Draco The Lord Trypodphobia, even?

[@benedictcruz07]

Yea, i felt that when i watch this vid

[@BeyFatherWBO]

Draco The Lord me too

[@orangulu9772]

Yucks,this really trypophobiaaaa

[@halowize]

Draco The Lord I cant smile infront of that.

[@Differentmedia]

Hey aren't these the guys responsable for ruining KZbin? Why are you on KZbin?

[@behappy5869]

Forrest Stevens whos these guys? you mean a few people in charge of wsj? you think this dude had anything to do this week? hahah

[@nntflow7058]

Not the flat earthers or Infowars?

[@peter_8170]

If you can't beat the join them

[@Blocks0]

Forrest Stevens What does that even mean?

[@themacocko6311]

Forrest Stevens Pretty sure KZbin is responsible for ruining KZbin...

[@tanmayvt28]

I am feeling anxious as to in which camera do I need to look into 😂

[@meleniumshane90]

It's an interesting concept that reminds me of how we use multiple small radio telescopes to study the stars, instead of one large one, to produce more details. I don't see it replacing full body cameras, but if it produces good enough results and they get the cost down, I could see it working

[@BumbleBeeBeeRock]

Mr Spidey called; he wants his eyes back. Lol.

[@labispapaioannou692]

Earth Angel we got a second call from the trypophobia police

[@Aufenthalt]

How do you solve the problems with the diffraction limited field?The PSF of the several cameras are much wider than the DSLR PSF you can't do very much about.

[@gav214]

This triggered my trypophobia

[@WarKlutch]

Sure it is

[@StarfireRebirthCM]

That's a made up term.

[@frog143]

I THOUGHT IT WAS A PHONE IN THE THUMBNAIL BTW IT LOOKS CREEPY lol 😶

[@ricog8209]

Auriv has no last name It's fugly.

[@aaronaaldridge5670]

Shalva look up tripophobia

[@jeremiahswartz2314]

Aaron Aaldabridge I was gonna say the same thing :) *trypophobia

[@harikrishnan1954]

LOL, like an alien with many eyes :D

[@anjai4448]

I thought the thumbnail was just Photoshop

[@SirGregory]

Seventeen months on, I think your question has been answered - I can't find one for sale anywhere. The light.co website reports the L16 has sold out, which is probably sales jargon for "no longer in production". In the same period, smart phones have been getting more lenses, so perhaps light.co was on the right track.

[@annd6546]

I'll stick to DSLRs better!!

[@av5cubes12yt3]

Anne Diche ikr

[@micahbell9093]

Same

[@kings7man]

Better develop a friendship with that packhorse guy then to carry it around

[@gapa6612]

That is not a joke?

[@mcp12300]

BezNicku I hope it is. It reads like april fools day.

[@springrollwang4441]

It's the future.

[@harryluong1453]

this 16 lens camera is also a threat to my bank account.

[@KentHambrock]

I love the idea and have since I first heard about it, but while it's superior in some ways (like versatility) to DSLRs, it certainly comes with it's own range of issues which DSLRs don't have. Every single camera on the planet has a trade off between a comparable model and this is in no way different. If you need size and refuse to carry around a selection of lenses or simply don't want to think about which ones you'll need, this might be a great option for you, but that 5D is going to take a significantly better picture in most scenarios (especially ones where light is low) when paired with the appropriate lens. This is in no way a replacement for someone who needs quality (or features) over convenience. I'd get this as a framing camera, though. Being able to frame a shot quickly without having to change lenses could be very useful for visualizing how a picture will turn out before going for the big guns.

[@vedadrokkor]

Would you rather have 16 bad cameras or one good one?

[@zzaacchh]

What do you consider bad and good?

[@musicofenlightenment6667]

iPhone 12 Pro : hold my beer

[@adhikm1885]

Are you kidding me? It’s not a threat at all, dude! Although having a larger mp but it doesn’t mean the photo would go sharp. DSLR sharp because of the quality of the lense, not the mp. Don’t fool us!

[@Alex632]

I like how he said the DSLR is around 30MP and with the weird looking thing he said "up to" i hate that word. Tell us nothing.

[@golljoll]

If you are a professional photographer (or even semi-pro) this will in no way replace your DSLR. If you want to point and shoot, your cellphone will work just fine. The major thing is that this camera will cost about 2000 dollars which is waaaaaaaaaaay too much for the target group.

[@colin4724]

Just another Silicon Valley tech startup lol

[@VincyBlueX]

4 years after that was the biggest tech fail

[@DogeCharger]

Are you bloody kidding me? This looks like the worst camera I've ever seen. Also the amount of misinformation is hilarious!

[@c.i.a.4618]

Doge Charger *_Exactly!_*

[@KentSpain85]

Misinformation? Such as?

[@chicken69tenders]

KentSpain85 such as the fact that it can't take better photos than a professional dslr and the photos are extremely noisy

[@KentSpain85]

Vanreelz Vancouver ahh. Ok thanks!

[@erictheboringone5292]

Vanreelz Vancouver I think you’re missing the point.

[@sarathkjolly]

And which camera used to shoot this video? 😜

[@willd.8040]

I’d really love to test this camera for a few weeks. Maybe this model isn’t better than a high-end full frame DSLR, it shows us a new concept that will likely be improved over time. The images I’ve seen from it are quite impressive. The price is the issue right now.

[@gur262]

Just look closer. No it isnt. Theres tons of problems it doesnt deliver most the time

[@ThefamousMrcroissant]

"Wallah a beautiful portrait" -Commercial man pretending to be journalist

[@microplastique]

Very good While Wallah comes from arabic, meaning "in front of god/Allah", and is used as a way to show that you are saying the truth ("I didn't copy your homework, wallah"), "Voilà" comes from french, but is also used in english with the same meaning, to point out the result of something ("Voilà ! My painting is done")

[@moayadamoor7925]

Pieulpe it doesnt mean: " in front of god " it means : i swear by god

[@MarcoMelendres]

Hmm, pretty sketchy tbh. DSLRs perform much better than this. Also, I don't think it's optical zoom if the picture size/megapixel count is being reduced. That's called cropping.

[@robertkorn]

It's not cropped, it is just limited to capture the information from the longer focal length lenses which limits the number of sensors it is getting data from. At wider angles it is able to use info from every lens, thus the greater MP count.

[@stringstorm]

I doubt it'll replace DSLRs. But I'm glad that this exists. This just shows that we're still a long way from super mega high quality phone cameras. But its good that we're seeing some tech being made for consumer use. We're taking a step in the right direction.

[@briliankamil4594]

good luck handling those files..

[@farihakhan8217]

brilian kamil xxx prpn vodeos

[@danielgebert4556]

"image quality is better than my dslr". Maybe with the kit lens

[@swinde]

Yes, pretty hard to believe when he is holding a Canon 5D Mark IV. Also the lens has a red ring around it meaning that it certainly isn't a "kit" lens. The red ring on Canon lenses indicates a premium lens most of which cost $1,000 plus.

[@erkiandresnuut]

He didn't say that. He said that the L16's images HAD MORE DETAIL than his DSLR's (could be true, given the megapixel count). He also admitted that they sometimes look grainy in low-light scenes - that makes sense too as the sensors behind these 16 lenses are tiny.

[@Princeton_James]

That's a big maybe

[@forsterl.stewart414]

No can't get same perspective as all my lenses...my full frame 5dsr is stellar...my 7d mii frames per second or focusing on a bird in flight with 400mm 500mm 600mm lens. Canons multi flash capability. I can go on and on. But why bother I will keep my canon dslr.

[@AndrewWitcher]

Technically the 24-105 F4 L is a kit lens...

[@AsherDutchie]

I’m a 15 year old learning to take photography for my GCSE and this is a slightly strange. I’m sticking to my DSLR and I can get plenty of beautiful photos with. I may be down to try the L 16 to see how well it works when it become available

[@TorchArts]

But... what lens do i look at?!?

[@MikeTrieu]

Torch Arts I asked the same question when I tried out my brother's Light. You generally just look at center mass and you should be good.

[@matthewhall319]

This is actually a legitimate question