Stretching the fuselage was the approach Boeing took in developing the 737max to avoid going through recertifcation by using proven components and subsystems. However, the lengthened fuselage and additional weight, without corresponding changes to the planes engines and wing lift capability, would mean it should still go through retesting and recertification, or potentially face safetyy problems experienced by the 737max.
@old.not.too.grumpy.2 ай бұрын
One thing to Airbus' advantage is passenger confidence in Boeing fleet. With all the negative press regarding safety issues with Boeing's planes, however unfounded, passengers could lose confidence in their reliability.
@cellevangiel5973Ай бұрын
I don't think Airbus is interested in beating Boeing. They do their own thing and do it well. And look at the Boeing struggles in disbelief.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
I don’t think so just looking at their aircraft building history, this one competed another, and other aircraft was built after an aircraft of the rival successful. Competition is normal
@TheE71462Ай бұрын
Yes there is no war, do the best at the best cost at much more security and safety because Airbus is intelligent and he perfect know that what happened to Boeing could very well happen to them…
@bryantickle81972 ай бұрын
Definitely go for it, A350 2000❤❤
@johnchristmas75222 ай бұрын
who will supply the parts???????/
@jamillikanАй бұрын
Airbus Forever!!!
@alexistarr2 ай бұрын
12:51 - No, I'm not concerned with aircraft emissions when flying. Carbon dioxide is plant food and greens the planet. Furthermore, there is a strong link between solar cycles and atmospheric temperature. As for the carbon dioxide levels, they actually lag rises and falls in atmospheric temperature; when temperatures rise the oceans out-gas more carbon dioxide, raising atmospheric levels.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
The most practical answer😎
@johnchristmas75222 ай бұрын
This is all supposition, Airbus has not indicated that it will build a A350-2000. It has said, it will wait to see how the market responds. Right now Airbus is not struggling for orders but struggling with its suppliers, who even now, after two years after Covid have still not caught up. Building yet another aircraft with the supply chain so bad is fraught with financial pit falls. Airbus are wise to hang back, there aren't enough orders to warrant another Aircraft just to placate a ignorant media.
@mijnordna2 ай бұрын
I’ve seen of lot of videos like this one lately that are more infomercial than real news, that are stuffed full of corporate sounding repetitious nonsense. I guess one good thing is you can get the message after about 30 seconds and can switch it off knowing you won’t learn anything else.
@harlandingessjr95227 күн бұрын
Both are great planes though. But the A380 was a beatiful plane. Bring it back.
@peanutquirin818812 күн бұрын
The A380-1000 with RR Ultrafan engines would be cool :),
@georgeszurbach4442 ай бұрын
Aiirbus does nt need to kill anyone he has been.dominating the game for years.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
That’s right
@karelrysavy3342 ай бұрын
Not sure whether it's that simple as just stretching the fuselage. There could be a problem with tailtrikes and also there might be the need for an entirely new wing that would provide the lift to accommodate those extra 40 pax
@jbountalas2 ай бұрын
I'm no aviation expert, but increasing the capacity by 40 seats in economy ? Doesn't sound to me like something that a manufacturer would see as worthwhile from a financial point of view. Airbus will focus on the their 350 F, next gen aircraft, higher efficiency, sustainable fuels, etc. I'd say this is click bait, which I fell for.
@jeaniesasmrАй бұрын
Not in economy just split maybe thats what he means.
@johrooАй бұрын
Why would they consider a similar sized aircraft like the 77X? Airbus is doing just fine, the A 350-1000 is for most airlines already more efficiënt than a 77X. Airbus learned a lot by the A 380 and are the leading manufaturer.
@ericchen60962 ай бұрын
The fuselage cannot be stretched indefinitely. The landing gears and wings have to be overdesigned to begin with. The fuselage itself has to have enough strength to withstand extra stress due to new weight and increased dimension from nose gear to main landing gears. The engines have to be more powerful as well.
@tiberiusblack141118 күн бұрын
A380 option 2 for always😊
@FLIGAVIA18 күн бұрын
Awesome!
@rommelcastro7742Ай бұрын
Why Boeing not just re-engineer the beautiful 747 with just 2 engines and composite materials???
@ralfurban8165Ай бұрын
Re-engineering just causes problems because Boeing is not able to re-engineer aircrafts as you have seen in case of the 737MAX. They did the big mistake in trying that. Instead of spending the 737 a higher landing gear, they made the wrong solution to shorten the pylons for the new gas turbines. MCAS always made trouble.
@JohnMiller-mv7wuАй бұрын
On my comments for an SST, Boom and the oil companies have come up with an organic SAF fuel for the Boom SST. Also the up to date technology has eliminated the need for an afterburner and made the aircraft as quiet as any other aircraft. The only environmental problem that remains is sonic booms which bars SST's from going supersonic over land but some engineers at Lockheed Martin are working on a way to reduce sonic booms.
An A350-2000 is all very well until you realise that there is no spare capacity with which to build it. The A350 is sold out until about 2030, the A350F will pick up steady orders, and with rumours of new orders from Emirates, Qatar and others for passenger and/or freight A350s, that will keep the line busy until an A350Neo can be built in the early 2030s, to replace aircraft ordered now. With RR upgrading all the Trents, with arguably the most important being the XWB-97 for the improved A350-1000, I cannot believe Airbus will spend money to compete any further with their existing aircraft, for which they have hundreds of orders. I did seem likely that this would happen, but the vast order book for the A350 accrued in 2023/4, now makes this very unlikely........
@neilhaas18 күн бұрын
Thats very interesting amazing.
@FLIGAVIA18 күн бұрын
It really is!
@siviweslara10232 ай бұрын
Airbus needs to address the single Engin option of the 1000 first, if they are able to have an alternative for a 2000 series, for sure it would probably work. But obviously, they want to avoid another A380 like loss.
@l2etranger2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@artrandy2 ай бұрын
The existing A350 is sold out until 2030, so why would Airbus be interested in an expensive engine option (presumably GE), just to sell a few A350s to US airlines that want US engines when, apart from Delta, the A350 has been a huge success around the world, without US sales. Airbus simply cannot increase production more than they're doing already. So more US sales apart from DL are unlikely. In Feb 24, AA were reported interested again, but nothing came of it. United have it on order starting 2027 delivery, and if they're sensible, they'll take them, or they could sell their slots to other airlines. That's the only forseen flexibility. I realise why GE might want a slice of A350 action, with the 777X going nowhere now until maybe 2027/8, but GE already refused to build an engine for the A350-1000 during development. They snubbed Airbus, and I think Airbus would be most reluctant to allow GE onboard again, especially with the new uprated XWB-97 for the A350-1000 due, which will increase time on the wing, a problem for desert based airlines. There is no sensible reason for any engine option on the A350 right now. RR are doing great, and oh, they have an exclusive until 2030, at least...........
@abelincoln8885Ай бұрын
What are you waffling on about ? Airbus is now the industry leader with at least a 5 year waiting list. They don't need an opportunity from Boeing to build an A350 2000. Boeing lost the war against Airbus in the late 80's when they refused to develop the 737 replacement after Airbus released the A320 and then in the late 90's they didn't copy Airbus by future proofing the 777 and as a replacement for the 747 with the new glass cockpit difigtal flyby wire force feedback stick controls. Instead Boeing waited 10 years for many airlines to switch to the A320, to release the 737 NG patting themselves on the back for having the most popular airliner .. that was designed in the late 60's. The A320 was designed in 80's ... with the latest technology and future proof ... to be better the the 737 in every way. See. Boeing completely screwed up by not developing the 737 replacement that would be better than the A320. And the A350 was built by Airbus ... because Boeing stupidly built the 787 ( without new side stick control glass cockpit) because nobody wanted a new variant of the 747 to counter the A380, instead of offering a 777 X with composite wings, reduced weight, new engines ... and simply doe NG, Max & X versions of the 757, 767 back in early 2000's. Again. Airbus is now the industry leader with a very long back order list. There aircraft are superior in every way to anything Boeing is making ... because Boeing did not did not build the 737 replacement to compete & dominate the A320. The 777 would have been modeled on the 7N7, Boeing continue with NG, Max & X versions of 757 & 767 until customers switch to the 7N7 and the new 787 with composite body & wings. Boeing screwed themselves by doing absolutely nothing when the A320 entered service for Aiir France in late 80's. The A320 was clearly better in every way to the 737 designed in the late 60's.
@tomriley5790Ай бұрын
The thing is Airbus need to keep developing new aircraft to avoid falling into the same trap Boeing did in the next 10 years or so. I also think that they need to start at least looking at a replacemetn for the A320, probably in 10 years or so as Boeing cannot possibly do another generation on the 737 after all the Max issues so they're goign to need to compete with whatever boeing produces....
@abelincoln8885Ай бұрын
@@tomriley5790 Nope. Although Airbus deserves to be #1 Maker with the best aircraft ....,they were fortunate Being did not make the 727 (small, twin), 737 ( medium, trijet), 747 ( Large, quad) by the start of the 70's. and all with tall landing gear anticipating larger frugal engines. They by mid 80's replace. The 757, 767, 787 should have replace the jets of the 60's. Airbus is not going to make similar mistake afte mistake for over 50 years not only the last 10. Both companies will secure their market share, and be able to match new designs with near identical performance numbers. Boeing is never going to be #1 again, unless they surprise everyone with something truly revolutionary. Not happen. Airbus 2/3 Boeing 1/3.
@harlandingessjr95227 күн бұрын
a380 , the king of the skies!
@keithreynolds3801Ай бұрын
The A350 2000 incorporates many 777X "attributes". How can this avoid a completely new aircraft registration?
@pauloyoshizaki2103Ай бұрын
AIRBUS = 350 - 2000 - New - Models : Lançaments- P/ : 2027 ~ 2028 : New ~ Model's : Geração = 2000 : New - Geração - Maior - New - Tamanho ! ❤: Airbus - A350 - 2000 New - Geração - Model's - 2000 : Parabéns !!! Airbus : ❤❤❤ Lançaments : Airbus : Séries 350 - Model's - Geração = 2000 ; Parabéns !!! Airbus ‐ inc ; Airbus = 2025 ❤❤❤❤.
@drewnos2 ай бұрын
Are you trying to tell the story of aviation? Why not mention the Wright siblings? You're telling to much fluff befor you get to the story mentioned in the title.
@marcom22482 ай бұрын
He needs to stretch the vids, in order to place ads.
@barracuda7018Ай бұрын
Thıs channel is BS...!!!!!
@Haywood-JablomieАй бұрын
also this is all written by AI ... there is no human narrator either
@neilhaas18 күн бұрын
The A350-2000 newest plane aircraft Airbus should proceed thats amazing nice jet.
@KlausErmecke2 ай бұрын
Dear "FLIG AVIA" - pls. consider no longer to overload your videos by too many tracks that lead away from the core topic (i.e. here the envisioned A350-2000)
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your feedback!
@MyDagfinnАй бұрын
A major contribution to BS - as Airbus is not working on this at all. The improve the 900 and 1000 model. No more fake news please.
@celloswissАй бұрын
🤦
@dennisehiobu2236Ай бұрын
Airbus is not building an A350-2000 because they consider the A350-1000 to be large enough. Airbus' Head of Marketing, Stan Shparberg, said that the A350-1000 is the company's flagship product.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
I think they will because compared to the 777X, the A350-1000 is still a bit smaller. The competition will not stop at any segment.
@JohnMiller-mv7wuАй бұрын
Boeing should discontinue the 777X and just improve the 777-300 with upgrades. Also if that Boom SST works out tje airlines will be demanding a larger capacity SST .Boeing and Lockheed Martin need to team up and build a larger SST. The Boom SST looks like it could be stretched some to get 100+passengers. Also they could up the power of the engines. Also an SST could make more flights accross the oceans and the problems with the Concorde have been overcome with technological advances with all aspects of the aircraft.
@sh2309682 ай бұрын
1 and 2 with appropriate time gap (in any sequence).
@aamiraamir1023Ай бұрын
Good avionics . aeronautics & expensive but must be install four engine
@AKhan-yl3qj2 ай бұрын
I would like to see the A380 900 back into production .. But it would be cheaper to bring the A350--2000 instead and would be better better than the Boeing 777X .
@stefanweilhartner44152 ай бұрын
exactly
@KlausErmecke2 ай бұрын
The A380-900 had been the visionary stretch version that was never finalized,. The decision to develop and produce a new airliner needs approval of many stakeholders, beginning with the full Executive Management and the Board of Directors (these institutions are usually separated in Europe, unlike in the USA). Potential creditors would raise eyebrows, and financial analysts would bash the company and send the stock nosedive. After the commercial failure of the original A380 and the dismanteling of the manufacturing system, it would be completely impossible to get a new positive decision.
@ronbrown32819 күн бұрын
A380 back into production with the GE9X engine.
@FLIGAVIA8 күн бұрын
How about UltraFan?
@rickymwamba96812 ай бұрын
More airlines trust Airbus aircrafts than Boeing's for safety and reliability!
@mijnordna2 ай бұрын
The plural of aircraft is aircraft.
@mcmuffin-z5v2 ай бұрын
Airbus has the ability to build this and kill Boeing but they are not going to do that simply because they don’t want to do that, being the sole main manufacturer of all planes will only lead to destruction because that’s just how businesses work, the airbus ceo says that he does not delight in Boeings hardships because he values their competition and what they bring to the market, as he says they should be working together to bring quality aviation products.
@angeri85652 ай бұрын
bring the A380 back in
@brettdemauna9994Ай бұрын
A380 an absolute Flop
@angeri8565Ай бұрын
@@brettdemauna9994 every body i know loves flying in it. THe US didn't like it as it replaced the 747.
@brettdemauna9994Ай бұрын
@@angeri8565. The US literally ditched the 747 & opted for a greener & more efficient twin 787,
@francescosacca18832 ай бұрын
Yeah, why not stretch that further and make it an a350-5000 😅
@stefanweilhartner44152 ай бұрын
i want to see a double decker!
@rolandvolmer2 ай бұрын
Both A350 and A380
@zapszapper91052 ай бұрын
Should be called A350-1100, If it is a straight stretch of the fuselarge
@jonanthansilva80702 ай бұрын
No Google tem uma imagem só pesquisar bem legal modelo q fizeram
@EinChris7528 күн бұрын
The production line for the A380 is gone. It's very unlikely that Airbus will invest in a new production line.
@FLIGAVIA28 күн бұрын
Yes but there are too many rumors lately
@chrisweavers9032 ай бұрын
Pure and utter clickbait speculation AI stuff?
@frankowot42 ай бұрын
This Airbus's NEW Aircraft Being Build EXACT Boeing's Killer - what are you trying to say?
@frogola57Ай бұрын
drill baby drill.
@thierryroussely41422 ай бұрын
But both of course!
@aadarshsavaikar4337Ай бұрын
1 & 2
@rommelcastro7742Ай бұрын
Both
@RainerSchromАй бұрын
Bla bla, what a waffling repeat of the same, same, same "facts". You could have done this video in a length of 5 minutes.
@RH-ck9gnАй бұрын
Telling the story of the A350-2000 and beginning with over 2:00 min B777 is boaring
@FortnitedagodАй бұрын
22222222222222222222 a380
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
Great!
@nabilisur95662 ай бұрын
I wish Indonesia add more AIRBUS types over BOEING for the future of developed country ever for Indonesia on 2045 years later. Especially Garuda Indonesia as I need except for Lion air, maybe just choose BOEING be the world's most worst airline ever as I hate it. Also, for military industry and Presidential plane for replacing BOEING to AIRBUS it's been great than ever exist.
@angeri85652 ай бұрын
I give not one iota of a damn on how much emmisions a plane uses, we need planes and we want planes, i don't care if they don't come up with a new form or fuel for 500 years.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
very practical thinking!
@HomoprimatesapiensАй бұрын
For Airbus sake it will be wise to stuck with the current A-350 900 and 1000 variants. And concentrate on more efficient low carbon emission t.f.e.'s The blended wing fuselage concept is really something that needs to progress. Hydrogen propulsion sounds a bit too risky. No one would fly on a hydrogen bomb with wings. Think about what happened to the Zepplin filled with helium. The hydrogen fuelcell/electric propulsion can be the most viable option for short and medium range a.c.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
Thanks for your comment.
@HomoprimatesapiensАй бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA Pleasure. 👍
@Hisokapote2 ай бұрын
The A.........350
@guillermobenavides19855 күн бұрын
1 - 2
@l2etranger2 ай бұрын
0:21 A340
@albertogambino25622 ай бұрын
Where? I only see a big A350 without engines.
@l2etranger2 ай бұрын
@@albertogambino2562 Look again, closely. The "topic" is about stretching an aircraft for greater capacities when the industry was going the other way, causing Airbus to stop or cancel its existing large capacities series: the A340 and the A380, respectively, each flying on 4 engines. It seems that everybody is jumping in the navgeek bandwagon without any clue what aviation and its history are about. A little knowledge about airplanes could easily turn this channel into a valuable resource of information about the aviation industry. The A350 came about after multiple decisions to respond not just to fuel efficiency but to more contemporary environment matters. Gathering data, videos and documents is just one aspect of the work behind the scene before even publishing a well polished, carefully articulated video.
@dsboykung2 ай бұрын
A350
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
That's a great aircraft!
@DeadlyDiggerАй бұрын
How is Boeing still in business
@markusdecimus47322 ай бұрын
Boeing is paid by Airbus to make commercials.
@smudge01614 сағат бұрын
Airbus never made any money on the A380. They will not bring it back.
@kenjigonzales6929Ай бұрын
3
@Richard1855Ай бұрын
Build A350-2000 PROVIDED Airbus learn from Boeing’s fatal mistake with the BOEING 737 MAX. By this I mean, installing a bigger engine to an existing aircraft. Just saying.
@guillaumedupont7565Ай бұрын
This is what Airbus did on the 330 neo and it poses no problem... Find out... The 737 has a ground clearance problem with the large LEAP engines because it is short on legs
@52ownsyouАй бұрын
The size of the engines wasn’t a problem, the length of the landing gear is the real problem of the 737.
@Andre-yu3qsАй бұрын
Nice.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
✈️
@codeblue90042 ай бұрын
Built not build.
@JTWorld294Ай бұрын
New pencil plane
@charliechristmas51472 ай бұрын
I see you’ve got some woke children on here complaining about hurty words like ‘killer’…..grow up and join the real world
@fungkouher25112 ай бұрын
Hydrogen! Greenhouse effect! Just imagine the hurricanes and floods this year alone!
@sanxim2 ай бұрын
2
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
😎
@petersierck41542 ай бұрын
350
@phildur2 ай бұрын
Encore une annonce putaclic.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
No
@ethannewfuse11432 ай бұрын
It is clear and will happen very soon, plasma energy will be used by every day households and will be free energy (No long need to pay bills), surely the aviation industry can utilise this too right?
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your feedback!
@MohammedFaizan-qi4iz2 ай бұрын
Pin me I have been a fan for a long time
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
😎
@saschaganser967110 күн бұрын
What is the video about? Airbus is not building another A350 stretch nor do they have another new plane in their pipeline?!? Hoax
@johnwatson77052 ай бұрын
1
@jujenhoАй бұрын
This chanel seems to be the Airbus propaganda department.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
Just because people care so much about Airbus. That's all.
@guillaumedupont7565Ай бұрын
No narrow minded propaganda Airbus has been the first for many years and makes the best planes and that's fine if that pisses you off ..boig boing is odated and cheesy
@fredricgrethel17172 ай бұрын
Blah blah blah. Your word salads are not useful.
@jjiglesiasg2 ай бұрын
Meanwhile no GE90 engine are installed on an Airbus airplane, there will not be a Boeing killer
@edwardwilcox66062 ай бұрын
GE90 isn`t relevant anymore, that old tech as good as it was at the time just isn`t fuel efficient enough for AB or Boeing.
@joeyahoo39022 ай бұрын
Could we PLEASE not use words like "KILLER" to describe aircraft. It's NOT funny. Thank You.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your feedback
@duaneedwards54392 ай бұрын
Really,..........lighten up Francis.
@konstanthin-tl2 ай бұрын
"Environmentally friendly". This word should be banned for aircraft. This 777x is only more fuel efficient than other aircraft, but it is by no means environmentally friendly. It still needs 70,000 liters for a long-haul flight. This is a disaster for the environment. You can't make this toxic machine look better than it actually is. It is simply the less environmentally harmful choice, but that doesn't make it "environmentally friendly".
@ricardosam8050Ай бұрын
A350 not A380 that’s one ugly aircraft A350 yes yes yes
@tobibu7610 күн бұрын
To answer your question: the CO2 emissions made me stop flying completely in 2018. Never flew since. Although I loved it before…
@afarangi48392 ай бұрын
How much of this video is truth ??? feels more like a clickbait to me