THIS Ancient Egyptian Saw-Cut Proves They Had a Lost Technology

The reason why there is a surging interest into the topic of lost ancient human civilizations by millions of people from around the world, is because the more you research the little-known, and unexplainable details, particularly involving the Ancient Egyptians…You quickly become aware of the bizarre reality that they had to have possessed some unknown form of lost ancient technology.
Follow and Support me on these other platforms where I can speak my mind and share TRUTH!
brightinsight.locals.com/support
www.subscribestar.com/bright-...
/ brightinsight
Follow me on Instagram: / bright_insight
Follow me on Rumble: rumble.com/c/BrightInsight
Follow me on Odysee: odysee.com/@BrightInsight:c
Follow me on TikTok: vm.tiktok.com/ZM8u3XBhL/
Or, Tip me on Venmo! @bright_insight
Must see Podcast I had with Danica Patrick! • Jimmy Corsetti | Are W...
Check out my podcast with Joe Rogan for FREE on Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/1dEL...
I'm Jimmy Corsetti, and my channel is called Bright Insight - Thanks for watching!

[@FrankMonday]

“Admitting we know nothing is the first step towards wisdom:” -Socrates (and this was a guy that lived a lot closer to the time of Atlantis than we do.)

[@winestore_grindcore3223]

I get what you're saying but, my Great Grandpa also lived closer to the time of Atlantis than we do.

[@FrankMonday]

@@winestore_grindcore3223 Seems our culture continues to regress. Just have a look at the buildings from the 1800’s. I recall taking a flight cross country in 1985, good gawd the luxury $50 could buy you. To have that kind of service today you’d have to charter a private jet and fly like Hunter Biden-high on crackrock and balls deep in a 15 year old hooker.

[@DRAWKCABLLA]

@@winestore_grindcore3223 i get what you're saying, but me yesterday lived closer to Atlantis than we do

[@FragranceView]

@@DRAWKCABLLA I get what you're saying, but you two hours ago lived close to Atlantis than you do now.

[@IOU1987]

@@FragranceView I get what you're saying, but you 5 minutes ago lived closer to Atlantis dan we do now.

[@bodragon4582]

as an experienced logger/carpenter, usually when you see a cut "veer off" its because the chain/blade your using has become dull, and when you push it, it cant keep cutting and goes off track.

[@CaliforniaCarpenter7]

Logger and Carpenter, eh? Two solid professions, I must say :). I had a perfect chain on a 28" bar cutting wildly crooked the other day, and I figured I must have kissed a rock or some such. Ended up being the bar rails, they had about doubled in width after fairly limited use. Name brand bar, too. Chinese steel at its worst!

[@bodragon4582]

@@CaliforniaCarpenter7 When my life is on the line, i only use quality, and you should too. Never go cheap with a chainsaw, ive used husqvarna for decades, jonesrud for small stuff, and a stihl if i have a toolbox with. be careful out there.

[@thefly5568]

Exactly, also did you notice the line of eroded granite coming out of the cut and running down the side of the block? Looks like the cutting fluid was coming out of the cut and running down the side of the block and actually ate some of the block away. Must have been some strong stuff to do that.

[@dunningkruger3774]

@@thefly5568 I was wondering who would address that guide line etched into the stone. Looks pretty "non professional" as a guideline I must say. Your theory of a corrosive material seems like a better idea than what would seem logical....like a snapline with powder. Surprised Jimmy overlooked that.

[@patriciabock4299]

@@thefly5568 that would be an explanation that could true. The only thing I can think of is how they controlled how much of the stone the acid cut? Acid would spread out to the surrounding stone.

[@brendanhogan7228]

I don't think they discarded it because of the angle! The angle caused the blade to bind and break the already cut part. This piece was to become the top for the box so they discarded the entire item probably because of the color mismatch if they tried using another piece for the lid. What would be very important to look at is how smooth are the surfaces within the cut groove? They would not be polished yet so it would be a clue as to what cut it. At the very internal part of the cut is it absolutely straight or does it have any curve whatsoever? That would tell you if it was a round blade or a straight blade (if a blade at all). There is so much information inside that cut!!!

[@makeitwork73]

I think in the same way,I think these guys ate good at what they do but they need someone who has used saws and tools all their life to be their expert witness so to speak because they would no what to look for.

[@NWNBanz]

yeah but we are stull trying to figure out how the fuck they cut them

[@hassyg4083]

think a microscope would show how it was cut. any info out there?

[@jamesjitsu9647]

From current evidence from cut and polished stones hiding in plain sight on the Giza plateau that exhibit large radii to cuts made that simply can only be the work of large diameter circular saws cut with amazing precision, I still find it incredible to believe that mainstream science and archeological societies won't accept that two guys with a copper saw did not cut the millions of stone blocks we see around ancient Egyptian sites. The rebuttal for the theory of the ancient Egyptians using a higher technology is simply that no circular saw blades have ever been found so therefore they didn't exist. But neither have any straight saws which we see in the BBC experiment sited as science fact by mainstream archeology. Ever. Only wood saws in a small quantity. However I also find it incredible that we are looking at these archeological sites expecting to find a 'smoking gun' 6 meter circular saw blade or any kind of tools for that matter that would show us how they were constructed. When you build a house you don't build it next to the sawmill or brickyard. Quarrys make more sense but likewise we don't polish granite today in the place it came out of the ground. It would not surprise me that somewhere in the 'less fashionable end' of Egypt buried beneath the sand is the biggest permanent stone finishing workshop imaginable where the majority of the stone would be worked and then shipped to sites around the country. Is that so difficult to believe the infrastructure of governance in Egyptian society could easily manage such a system? If whoever built these structures is capable of moving an 80 tonne stone 900 miles I'm sure they would be able to fathom a distribution centre for building projects around the country? And that is where you would find the evidence that everyone craves. Unless the ancient Egyptians didn't build the pyramids and all the real evidence was washed away by the younger dryas cataclysm of course.

[@almostsirens6577]

They say that it can't be circular saws cause they haven't found any. But why wouldn't they melt down the old ones and make another blade instead of throwing it away? I'll never understand the expectation of findings. It's the same reason we recycle tbh

[@leviwooten3795]

@@almostsirens6577 I posted a comment before reading all these other ones. I have made the same assumption seeing that cut. It's 100% a circular blade cut. There's also evidence like y'all were saying they found granite that had saw circular saw marks in it. If they built the pyramid and all the other shit. Why would they leave everything left around the area to look like shit? They wouldn't. They would clean up melt the saw blade turn it into different tools or other that's. A circular saw blade would cut amazingly well compared to by hand. All they have to do is split huge rocks by hand with splits and hammers and then roll the saw over and power it by slaves pushing a gear connect to the saw blade. All you need now is water. Guess what the pyramids had the river running right next to it. Even been proven the pyramids we're a legit power generator. Shits crazy

[@truescotsman4103]

currently we use circular saws with diamond embedded blades cooled with water to cut granite. We use huge chainsaws to cut limestone and marble. maybe they had huge copper circular saws embedded with diamonds and destroyed them after they used them just to fuck with us?

[@stpfs9281]

Water erosion around the Sphinx is interesting, as well as ancient maps of the area and satellite radar maps showing underlying topography beneath the Sahara. Climates can change fairly rapidly... There are towns in the Sahel from the 1920's that are now semi-buried in drifting sand (Brian Cox, Entropy).

[@sadhu7191]

They had to have international trade world wide I assume

[@JELazarus]

With the "stones being moved by boat" theory, has there been a survey of the Nile bottom? If this were really the method, one would think the river bed would be scattered with multi ton stones that were accidentally lost in transport over the centuries. It should look like Yanaguni (probably spelled that wrong) down there!

[@gregnorvell9730]

No, I doubt that theory. FedEx wasn't delivering back then. Joking aside, yeah one small mistake and that stone ends up at the bottom of the Nile. Good point!

[@PeterKoperdan]

That’s actually a very good point I haven’t come across before!

[@bunnycute666]

Ever heard of 'Nile Crocodiles'!?🤔

[@someGuy-os3kg]

The Nile has shifted over the centuries though.

[@andreaschadeck5596]

@@someGuy-os3kg I was going to say that too, supposedly about 8 miles away from the dry river bed that runs closer to Giza

[@sonjanordahl3158]

True scientists are not afraid to say, "I don't know." I love archeology & ancient history. It saddens me that so many give way to peer pressure.

[@mrvax2]

It's not just peer pressure, it's funding. The filthy rich have any discoveries of our ancient past stolen and taken into the care of their mansions and secret societies. People like Zahi Hawass have made millions in plundering discoveries in the middle of the night. He was eventually fired but no one knows just what he helped steal.

[@jimeagle6541]

True science is ostracized now thanks to men who hate god and think they’re smarter than the creator whose creation they study

[@foxdavion6865]

modern archaeology is a joke. It's all guess work and they fill in the unknowns with BS; It's the only field where they do this. This is on the same level as when physicists thought that Eather was what space was made out of. The so-called-experts make guesses, True archaeology is discovery of facts. What we have is archaeologies trying to make scientific supositions, that isn't discovering history, that's creating modern theories based on no conclusive evidence, that isn't discovering history, that's inventing it.

[@azuroslazuli6948]

It stops being just peer pressure when you can be stripped of your credentials for questioning the norm. Galileo evidently wasn't the first, nor would he be the last. :/

[@OrangeNash]

Maybe they do. I don't know.

[@philhagoes9339]

Having lived in Egypt, and been inside the great pyramid, I have to agree with you. There is NO way these cut with basic bronze tools. You cannot put a piece of paper between the stones at the pyramid. I dont know who did it, or how they did it, but it was with technology that we have yet to understand.

[@cCiIcCo]

You couldn't put a paper between the stones of the pyramid?! What do you mean? Like all of the stones? Or specific parts of the pyramid? King's chamber, Queen's chamber and the outer casing for example? Because I really doubt that all stone were that precise. The inner casing stones were not that precise at all.

[@anthonystar]

You'd think that the tech used to cut & transport such massive stones would be passed down as valuable knowledge by the Egyptians

[@toaster1443]

They put them on logs and rolled them like a conveyer

[@MrFrankwizzal]

When I cut concrete. We use a 7" walk behind concrete saw. When the blade gets dull and heats up, it goes off corse from your guides on the saw. You can't see that you're off corse till the saw moves over the cut is no longer blocked by the saw. The picture reminds me of that. I've seen pictures of ancient saw cuts, there's no doubt in my mind that they used circular type saws and knew how to polish stone

[@steveperreira5850]

I have a lot of experience, a tremendous amount, cutting things manually which is slow and with mechanized equipment which is fast, and what you have said is exactly the truth. There is no possibility, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that somebody cutting slowly would make such an error and continue to cut. Duh!!

[@jamie2206]

Especially in granite

[@teflonkixllc8776]

I feel like they used some type of water jet

[@icypirate11]

I totally agree with you Matt. I used to be a granite and marble fabricator. I cut and polished stone for about 5 years. There is no doubt in my mind the ancients had "powered" saws and drills with diamond blades and bits. When a blade gets dull or not enough water is used to keep the blade cool the blade warps and wobbles. The cut will go off course. My personal opinion is that the known Egyptian historical timeline we have doesn't go back far enough in time to account for the stone architecture. The Egyptian history we know is more primitive with small tools and stones. (As a Christian, I believe there was a worldwide flood/tsunami, as recorded in many ancients texts, that wiped out the ancient world. I believe there is tremendous evidence of water damage around the world. In my opinion, the Egyptians as we know them discovered the pyramids AFTER this destructive event and rebuilt on top of the advanced rubble with their primitive structures. They are the ones that graffitied everything with their hieroglyphs. I think over the thousands and thousands of years since the birth of these megalithic structures the ancient diamond tools have all rusted to dust. The evidence to leading me to believe there was a great reset that took place thousands of years ago and mankind basically started over.)

[@MrFrankwizzal]

@@icypirate11 absolutely. You hear stories and reports on how the earth experienced multiple ice ages and or shifts. It's very possible the technology was there before those events and just gotten lost with time or just assume that it's impossible for that time cause it was so long ago and how could they know any better. We found old gears from way way back in history. So many amazing sculptures. Cities under the seas from some natural event. They found whale fossils on mountains in the Andes. Whale Valley in Egypt. Animals found frozen in place when they where eating. There's very little dought in my mind that events happened that caused us to start over.

[@HonestBlur]

I think the answer is in the question. In hieroglyphs, the Egyptians never explained how they accomplished such feats of engineering, so how did they do it? Well, I think whoever did this, did so before the Egyptians arrived in this area. Whether it be a more ancient civilization or something else, I think it is time to consider the Egyptians did not participate in such complicated engineering.

[@josephpotter7776]

Most smart people believe this

[@fernandopires834]

10000% Agreed! I believe in that since being kid! The Egyptians "inherit" The Pyramids! They definitely could not had created!

[@GenericHandle01]

It is also possible that this was some kind of state secret (which I find unlikely since the method is used all over the place) or so mundane and common place that they did not even consider recording the process in Hieroglyphs. Of all of the instruction manuals and info graphics I have seen in my life, I have never seen one for drinking water. Perhaps the knowledge was so common that it was deemed unnecessary to record it since it was assumed everyone would always know how to do it. All that being said I think people moving into and repurposing abandoned structures seems more likely since the structures that this technology was used to create were so integral to society, that failing to document their creation (when so many other practices were documented) would be unlikely. I do think it is important to keep an open mind about other possibilities since narrow thinking is the bane that plagues purported scientists in this and perhaps every age.

[@noodles7011]

They have documents on how they cut stone. Even if they didnt make this box the Egyptians were masters at stone work.

[@noodles7011]

Have you ever seen the Engineering that has been proven to be done by the Egyptian? Its amazing.

[@cannednolan8194]

We know they had the wheel. We knew they used it on pottery. They also used counter weights. I’m sure they set up a manual saw to speed up sawing. But even then the cuts inside the box can’t be explained.

[@kowrw]

Someone already commented on it BUT I still want to say that I am a FIRM believer that the Egyptians did not build these structures at all. They were already there.

[@kengriffin1035]

A lot of the answers we want about ancient Egypt is beneath the Sahara desert . I can guarantee that their are ancient building there

[@johnp9402]

As a metal fabricator this kind of error happens when cutting fast. Most of the time it's when a blade flexes. Could they have been using an abrasive wheel? Is that why we haven't found any tools as abrasive wheels wear into dust as you use them?

[@martynrudd6070]

The Egyptains hadnt invented the wheel ? this is another problem with modern teachings and school teachings they are all way off the mark.

[@juliusfucik4011]

@@martynrudd6070 of course they had the wheel. This is not up for debate. They had chariots.

[@okshadowbannedjet7981]

I believe I saw some evidence that the Egyptians indeed used big cutting discs of some sort. In some of the Brian Foester videos.

[@cassidy678]

@@martynrudd6070 They used wheels to measure distance. It's why the pyramids' edge lengths are divisible by pi.

[@Skinflaps_Meatslapper]

Orthodox teachings were that the Egyptians had yet to invent the wheel while they were making their most impressive works during the beginning of their civilization. Chariots were a later invention. It all seems ridiculous to me.

[@KhaledKimboo4]

The fact that they faced the side of the stone cut towards the museum wall is enough for me

[@WorldwideDarts]

All I know for certain is that there seems to be a HUGE chunk of missing technology from whenever these pyramids were built. There's so much that we simply do not know

[@vbrigham]

Ok I'm a machinist! I recognize that mistake as being a part coming loose from its holder, and moving on a table! That block must have been on a very large, precision table, that the block was clamped down on. The blade cutting it would have been part of the machine! No way even a hand held power tool could do that. They had a very large milling machine to cut that. I have ran some large machining centers that would not be large enough to cut that stone! The machine that cut it was huge! Much bigger then the rock its self.

[@JPEight]

So the 10 ton block just jumped off the table... this is the most ridiculous 'explanation' I've heard yet. Much more likely that the frame holding the saw broke

[@scottjohnstone6204]

@@JPEight He didn't say it jumped off, it came loose and moved as it was being cut, likely the force of cutting moved it. Then they shifted it and grabbed another presumably.

[@JPEight]

@@scottjohnstone6204 Same difference, what kind of saw blade that thin could push a 10ton block several inches to the side without bending under the tension? The cut is still perfectly straight in the vertical direction.

[@rehoboth_farm]

Yeah, and just imagine how much force would have been required to rotate that block a few degrees on a table. I was kind of thinking that it might have been a tool on an adjustable arm that swung out of alignment. Honestly I could see either happening though. Either the huge piece of material moved or the tool moved but either way it was obviously a high speed tool of some kind that produced a fairly small kerf compared to the length and depth of cut. Something else that I found interesting is that they cut the inside of the box before finishing the outside. That isn't how I would normally go about doing something like that. Normally I would finish the exterior dimensions of a piece and then cut out recesses. It would seem like being able to get good internal dimensions compared to the outside of the box would require finishing the outside first. (square and aligned) Well, it would be easier anyway. The clean, square, internal dimensions really seem to indicate a process more like broaching to me but I'm not really a machinist, though I have screwed around with a mill a little. I'm curious to know what you think about the inside and the difficulty of cutting that before finishing the exterior.

[@traceytaft6101]

@@MerwinARTist I thought u was my son, Scott then, as in same name's but no, sorry, but great insight!! XXX 💋

[@Doc-Holliday1851]

From a woodworker’s perspective what is extra strange about the cut is that it tapers, and does so in two directions. A straight sided saw cutting through rock wouldn’t create such a tapering effect. Most saws are wider at their cutting tip than they are along their spine. Such a saw creates a perfectly straight sided cut that meets at a square edged trough at the bottom of the cut. This kind of cut could only have been accomplished with an abrasive cutting device that became progressively wider at its spine. Additionally, the way the cut is means that the stone was being cut either at an angle by a straight saw (such as the two man saw shown in the video) or by a circular saw blade. I would be interested in knowing how deep the kerf is in the center of the stone as compared to the sides. If it was being cut by a straight saw you would expect the middle to be shorter than the sides (this follows from a technic used to keep a saw cut straight) or straight all the way across. If it was cut by a circular saw the middle would be deeper than the sides. Based on what we see, an abrasive was absolutely used. Copper or bronze saws could have been used to do it, but the saw would have needed to be moving at a higher rate of speed than we see in the demonstration. If we want to go the manpower route they would have needed something similar to the lumber cutting pits used by ship builders. That way they could get a longer saw and apply more force to it. If we want to say it was a machine I think the best explanation would be a bronze circular saw. That could absolutely reach the speeds necessary to accomplish this. Also there are what appear to be chiseled lay out lines that the cutters were following. Certainly, if this was a slower process such a mistake would never occur. This suggests a level of incompetence only capable by someone moving quickly in their job.

[@EthanWane]

Either slowly or automated with sonic drilling and cutting tools. Someone forgot to check on it

[@BigGaz1953]

I'd be interested as well. That cut looks to have been made by a high speed device, perhaps either reciprocal or circular. Some researchers suggest the pyramids etc were built 1,000s of years before the ancient Egyptians. I'm open to listen to any theory if it is presented well enough. The Egyptians meticulously recorded events. Given there is no record of how the pyramids and precision carving was done, one may perhaps conclude that they were already there. If so, this theory doesn't fit the narrative, so would be ignored.

[@bardmadsen6956]

At first glance it looks like a circular saw that has become fatigued and is deviating as just about any method other than Electrical Discharge Machining or abrasive waterjet cutting. It amazes me how tons of people have been there and no one has maneuvered an endoscope in there and determined it it is circular, wire, reciprocating, or a real mystery.

[@reina4969]

Exactly. We want to know if the base of the cut hidden deep at the bottom of the crevis is concave, straight, or convex. One idea that is not brought up is a high tensel strength rope/chain like one uses in a cable saw. This would leave a convex cut so that the middle would be higher than the sides. At the end of the day I believe the process they used was STILL very very slow, and they had the dumbest of mooks doing the cutting. The put the guide scratch in to lead the mooks and visually, it looks like the cut was mostly still in line, and that it was the scratches that were not straight.

[@joseph9770]

I'm wondering if they used some form of wire/chain saw like the ones they use to cut vehicles/ships/etc.

[@donovandelaney3171]

The Egyptian cranes, batteries, clothing and building blueprints are missing too.

[@donovandelaney3171]

Another mystery is where did some of the Ancient Egyptians and Romans go after their collapse?

[@B3ATLFAN]

“We have to think outside the box” I see what you did there :) Yet again, great video Jimmy!

[@ArminLks]

nice

[@rehoboth_farm]

@@BrightInsight Hey Jimmy. Look at 2:30 I think I figured something out. I think that they were going to cut the bottom off of the box and use it as a lid. Whenever it broke the saw or piece of work shifted leaving the jagged cut. Since the lid was ruined they threw the whole thing away.

[@rehoboth_farm]

@@MerwinARTist Yeah. I'm convinced after more looking that this is the lid. It looks like they cut the whole thing including the inside and then flipped it over. Then I think they shaped the lid and were cutting it off horizontally with the lid facing up. The lid broke either because of the weight of the stone causing a saw malfunction or the saw malfunctioned causing the lid to break. (chicken/egg) Then since the lid was ruined and matching a new piece of stone to the lid would have been difficult they just threw it in the Phuket Bucket. If this is what happened they should have placed some material, wood wedges maybe in the kerf behind the saw to keep the saw from binding from the stone from torquing downward. This sort of thing is pretty common with wood or steel. Maybe it was a weak spot in the stone. At any rate, I think that we can conclude from this piece that the Egyptians cut the lids of these boxes from the bottoms of the boxes.

[@Pynaegan]

It's quite possible that the "stone box" served it's purpose as intended. Having been used as a "saw horse", supporting another stone work as *IT* was being cut.

[@freaksrus2013]

Gorgeous explanation!

[@MusicFromTheOm]

Aaaah, so true!

[@Aurealeus]

Yes, and another possibility is that they could have been making a special cut to 'fit' an adjoining stone, like a puzzle, similar as what is seen throughout the world in other megalith type structures or even to be used in a sculpture.

[@ifluro]

Or they were cutting the 'lid' off and the lid broke, hence abandoning it. I can see a rough groove that lines up with the cut and continues to the end of the block.

[@Wastelander2281]

@@ifluro Interesting idea. I saw it and thought I would like to know what that groove was for and at which point it was made

[@akj616]

Here in India ( Bharat) , we have massive temple structures which date back to 1000-2000 years and the method our ancestors used to cut big block of stones was chiseling and making small marks on the marks along a line and then pouring really hot water on those lines until they gave in . Probably, this can be one of the possibilities how ancient Egyptians cut those massive stones. If you want to study , you must visit the ancient ruins of Hampi , and you would know what exactly I’m talking about.

[@roylle6346]

The ancient Indian architectures are mind blowing too. But did you watch this video?

[@JowanFrontline]

This works for certain types of stone but not with granite

[@paulandrulis4672]

For any different technique to be used, such leaves evidence behind. For instance, in cold climates hole can be drilled along a line, and then water is poured in and allowed to freeze. This is how pioneers harvested limestone for fences or houses in Kansas. However, with that technique you always find spaced halves of the original boreholes into the rock. The problem with finding a rock or board with a straight, even cut-mark is that a saw had to be used to make it. Splitting with water (hot or cold) never gives a perfectly flat smooth surface. The surface is always uneven, bumpy, or grainy due to the stone fracturing along grain lines. As you can see from the cuts in the picture, material was removed from the cut area, leaving a gap where they stopped. Some of the cuts there that stopped in mid cut, show a clear arc at the end of the cut, demonstrating the cutting device to be circular. These are not the only oddities to be found at the giza site, not even close. Drill holes with kerf marks (only made by saws or drills) and consistent radius that curve, etc. These have perplexed engineers and modern stone workers, professionals who actually have more than a clue what is necessary and possible with the evidence at hand, unlike archeologists of any caliber who insist on patently ridiculous assertions because the evidence points to something they do not wish to even consider.

[@ridetillidieharleyyamaha4063]

Not in a million years would that work with granite mate

[@filthySPACErat]

They didn't record their method of cutting stone because to them it would be something they would have considered obvious.

[@ericberg2131]

You forgot to mention that the stone the Egyptologists tested at 4 mm/hour was limestone. Not granite.

[@pteppig]

Yea, with a bronze saw on granite, that would be more like 4mm per day - and per saw blade. Cutting it with a carbide disc or high pressure water and some added abrasive like fine sand seems more likely.

[@curlyhairdudeify]

@@pteppig The sand would turn the blade to dust before cutting into the stone. Simple logic.

[@gothamgoon4237]

The fact that the Egyptians wrote down almost everything of importance in their society yet didn't write down how they cut and moved huge stone blocks tells us that they had no idea how it was done because they didn't do it.

[@salvadorpradoramos]

Yeah jimmy said that. Thanks for spewing what he said, parrot boy.

[@Omar-df3uk]

So who built those huge temples

[@munkmunk4854]

There is a strong general belief that we are living in a superior technological / moral age right now. Why do we think so? And is there any potential reason to hide something that shows the opposite to be true. Perhaps such writings are doomed to be classified.

[@MM-qg5xh]

Makes sense

[@MM-qg5xh]

@@Omar-df3uk yes. Makes sense also. But why didn't they draw how?

[@godchi1dvonsteuben770]

The antikythera mechanism shows that the idea of metal gears, and the math behind gear ratios, both existed during the time of the ancient Egyptians. This means that it was well within the realm of possibility that they constructed a mechanical Transmission in order to turn a crank, and have that rotation multiplied many hundreds of times, in order to spin a circular saw at a high rate of speed. The missing technology is a mechanical transmission, and harder metals. Those harder metals were probably so difficult and expensive to produce, that they were produced in very small numbers and only as needed, and the metal being so valuable was then recycled so many times that it survived on into an era where the metal did exist, only in a form no longer recognizable as ancient Egyptian, leaving no evidence that it was originally smelted by the ancient Egyptians. Mechanical transmissions, and harder Metals. There's your missing technology.

[@joshuabastion995]

If the Egyptians had created such a thing, there would still be evidence of said machine today

[@joshuabastion995]

The antikythera mechanism is the best evidence of how wrong the claimed science is regarding previous civilisations and the age of man.

[@xman870096]

I'm 63yrs. old I have been fascinated by history (especially ancient history) all my life and I've always believed that the 'ancient history' that we've been led to believe is little more than stubborn bullheaded lazy fairy tales. For the most part all these historians have only left us with unproven theories as to how these incredible feats of engineering and construction were accomplished.. The 'proof' that debunks their theories has always been there right out in the open as has been demonstrated by this video, but their unwillingness to just say 'I don't know' is just sad to me... I'd much rather have someone just say they don't know than try to sell me on some obvious bullshit theory. To be 'stuck on stupid' only erodes whatever little credibility they may have had.......

[@yamana1243]

Hi mmmm i am a muslim and in the quran allah says about his prophet Solomon that he used to get help from Jinn quran said ( (35) He said, "My Lord, forgive me and grant me a kingdom such as will not belong to anyone after me. Indeed, You are the Bestower." (37) And [also] the devils [of jinn] - every builder and diver (38) And others bound together in shackles. (39) [We said], "This is Our gift, so grant or withhold without account." (40) And indeed, for him is nearness to Us and a good place of return.) maybe the egyption were not able to see the Jinns so they could not draw them on stones ? what do you think? about that ? thing sis up until now there is no scientific info that is mentioned in the quran that has been proven false so you can assume this is the truth?

[@Godfrey_first_tarnished]

Yes precisely, I would rather have the romance of the mystery then the assumption that they couldn't be smarter then us or more advanced it has been proven in dna mapping of humans they found that we have been brought to numbers as low as 80 mating pairs and I think extinction events and the burning of great libraries like the library of Alexandria have set humens back centuries and so much has been forgotten.

[@Godfrey_first_tarnished]

@@yamana1243 sir no disrespect but don't you think if it was a ghost(jin) then there would be no cut marks at all? And they've found drilled holes that could have been made by Harnessing the power of vibrations and sound so I doubt a supernatural being would go to all the bother and honestly I'm a god fearing man my self but this is a human feat of Engineering I personally believe God made us but free will was his greatest gift and that's why I think every achievement man has made is there own and even before man who's to say the dinosaurs were one of his previous attempts at making man not say he failed but whose to say he didn't experiment. Just some food for thought.

[@danfontaine8179]

Doing actual historical research based off nothing but physical evidence is an insanely difficult undertaking. There are those more than willing to take the easy route and do grandstanding instead of the actual work.

[@patriciabock4299]

@@yamana1243 I believe that the technology used during the building of these and many buildings around the world was wiped off the face of the earth during the Great Flood that was recorded in many different cultures all over the world. If you think about that and present day, if a catastrophe of that magnitude happened today how much technology would be able to survive, if the people who create and produce it was no longer available? The technology was lost due to one such catastrophe. I also believe that the Jinn mentioned in the Quran also repeats what other cultures recorded and passed down through their generations of the people who built such structures. Scientist basically put out theories until they are proven to be useable or disproven and the scientist go back to their theory plots. The evidence of such cutting of stone shows us that no saws were used. If you cut something with a saw it leaves behind a pattern that will tell you what kind of saw was used. This is the most easily seen on wood cuts that depict whether an ax, circular or straight saw was used to cut it into the shape you see today. The precision of the cuts speak of a laser cut!

[@Rachel-18]

Same here Jimmy, I am also concerned about the future. Make a video about what’s going on in todays modern culture, I’d love to hear your opinions.

[@kriswilldoo6042]

Simple... We are heading to the GREAT RESET.. All that was built on negative actions is the only thing that gets destroyed.. pyramids will remain like always.. All that was lost will be found.. the price must always be paid.. Karma....

[@insanebmxthomas]

oh you mean the collapse? :p

[@skate_health7319]

Once upon an ancient time there was a country called usa….

[@davesmith5656]

Pls see Mark Dice

[@williamangeles9761]

They even used it in an movie about ancient times. A Hollywood movie.

[@A369J]

I see how carefully you choose ur words due to current circumstances, I definitely hear you, I love ur videos keep it up 👍🏽

[@exotictasterthe3rd295]

Love all your content Jimmy. Love that you've been opening up and expressing yourself more keep it up.

[@bohdan_bond]

I personally examined this sarcophagus few months ago in Cairo museum. It’s located on the left passage after you get through the main entrance. Besides main cutting track shown in this video it has absolutely unbelievable tool marks where the lid was cut. These marks are straight parallel stripes left on the surface by unknown tool. Their height goes for all the width of the lid and the distance from one stripe to other is about one millimetre. Also the cut overall looks like the stone was melted asides. Our civilization have no tools that leave such a marks.

[@EthanWane]

Just like this cylinders sides right? kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKTUgH95jb6tpKc

[@21EC]

To me it looked like it might have been cut using an extremely hot metal cutting tool which could explain the melting stone thing you mentioned..sounds logical to think that they probably used a really hot cutting tool of sorts so it allowed them to cut it faster.

[@MrXennhorn]

@@21EC granite's melting temp is ~1200 degrees celsius... which is above both Copper and bronze ..

[@number1bobo]

@@21EC - stone melts at much higher temps than metal tools.

[@TechyBen]

@@21EC That may be abrasive/friction, not heating directly. Which suggests a quick and fast moving tool.

[@froogsleegs]

The section that the cutting was supposed to separate from the body of the box has a rounded top that looks precise, like computer-guided lathing. Very interesting 👌

[@tonyhaines2337]

The hardness scale should be the only proof needed that copper/bronze saw was impossible.

[@lokikuro4236]

I found out today that the Japanese tried to recreate a small version to scale of the pyramid back in the 70s. Long story short, they concluded how it was not created with the “traditional “ way that many archeologists suggest.

[@opticracer3927]

Hi Loki, yeah i remember watching an old report about it. Very telling.

[@adrazuel]

And when Mark lehner tried to replicate a smaller version of the sphinx' nose only to complete it with modern tools because the copper chisels were doing very little very slowly

[@adrazuel]

@@AJNoon ah, I see

[@ronking5103]

Did they imply that it required alien or advanced technology? I've yet to see any evidence that requires either of those explanations ahead of more likely ones, such as a massive work force whose only purpose were to serve, even if it was the most tedious and difficult of tasks. 4mm an HOUR! Yeah, well when you have millions of slaves that have nothing better to do than cut at a rate of 1/3 FT per day, you can still accomplish just about anything you want. Just because we wouldn't do it, doesn't mean it wasn't done.

[@adrazuel]

@@ronking5103 no one mentioned aliens. What is being debated is the method that was used. According to people who do work with stone the signs suggest that it was done at speed and not a slow back and forth. And that the practical tests done to prove the stone bashing and copper/bronze chisels do not replicate what is shown. Resources are not infinite, not even slaves

[@vbrigham]

To continue saying these stones were cut with bronze tools is comparable to people continuing to say the earth is the center of the universe when others were telling us that was wrong.

[@lochnessspeedwerkz6557]

Not exactly because we found physical proof that the universe was heliocentric. We still have no idea how the stones were cut and moved about. As long as we have no idea, there will always be an "expert" claiming they figured it out.

[@lochnessspeedwerkz6557]

@pyropulse yes, but we proved the universe was heliocentric, we still cannot prove exactly what they did. As long as there is a question we will have "experts" claiming they have figured it out.

[@Skullpimp]

The 10 mile long ramp needed to put the giant stones in place would be just as much an unbelievable build as the pyramid itself..not to mention the precise mathematical significance of location and size no human could calculate.

[@steveritt]

inset ramp that spirals internally around the perimeter wall. Some videos on YT explain this

[@dreamknight72]

At 6:36, the pic of the boat uncovered beside the pyramid. The Emerald Tablets mentions that Thoth buried a craft under the sphinx. And if it needed fuel or energy to ride out the next cataclysm, it's parked next to the power station, the Pyramids. Old king hears the rumors and buries his ship too.

[@DownLow0099]

It's becoming ever more clear that there was a great civilization long BEFORE the Egyptians. They didn't right down how they built the massive structures because they didn't build them. They just found them and built around them.

[@Astralwolf23]

I still believe the ancient Egyptians merely inherited such things and they themselves never knew how to do such work. Human civilisations that predate them and after the fall we became a race of amnesia.

[@jessezass]

That was Larry's last day on the laser saw. He was staying up too late partying and doing nyborg and kept falling asleep on the job the next day. The boss warned him but he fell asleep anyway while making this stone cut, jerked awake, knocked the laser machine over and damn near cut off Jeff's arm. Larry was fired on the spot and wound up begging for credits in a bus station. It's sad really, he was a good guy but the nyborg got ahold of him and pushed him right over the edge.

[@BESTMOAD]

Not funny at all 😐

[@bl8388]

At least a 10% chance Larry was showing off for some hot chick thousands of years ago. They had them back then too. Same challenges.

[@mortenpedersen8226]

That saw cut only proves that someone made a mistake and stopped once a supervisor put a stop to it. A few mistakes making 10's of millions of those stones you have to reckon with.

[@JMunsonII]

Looking at the stone box.... I see indentations, like guidelines "melted" into the surface of the box. Also, the cut is extremely smooth. Lastly, the "slab" where the saw clearly goes out of bounds seems to have a wider entry than where it stops. Something really fine made that cut and clearly cuts very fast given where the stop occurred.

[@nachgeben]

Yeah, looks like a laser-type of heat used.

[@artvandelay1967]

is there any stones that show saw marks? I havent seen any.

[@kellypg]

@@artvandelay1967 there's a few that have what resemble circular saw marks.

[@Rygar91]

These stones were designed in molds and cut when wet with rope/wire of some sort. Extremely commonly done in pottery, which they were very well skilled at. These guidelines should be more proof than anything that they were cut when wet.

[@JMunsonII]

@@Rygar91 and how did they pour granite?

[@conorhudson1486]

Water powers saws seem feasible. Maybe it was left unattended for a while. The hierapolis sawmill show that this kind of tech did exist in ancient times.

[@As_Asa_PhD]

Thats exactly what I was thinking.

[@ChuckMothaEfenNorris]

Yes i thought that too. The same concept as the saw they were experimenting with but powered by some other element like an ancient power tool

[@jamesmcphee6406]

Sameeee

[@mykulpierce]

There are no such saw blades for the water to power.

[@AbyssalSoda]

Honestly this is what I thought, slow or fast, looks like it was done via some kind of water cutting.

[@greatgamingchannale8257]

It needed to have soooo much power to go that deep in order to be considered a mistake, you can also see it has some form of damage all the way until the other side of the box, like it was hit by such a force it cut a hole and created a crack.

[@artivan111]

To me, these stones all look like they've been 'softened' to cut.... like cutting butter... or clay

[@Rekaert]

I've used circular cold saws and band saws to cut constructional steel, and when the saw runs off like that it can be down to a few reasons. The blade teeth can get fouled with debris by a combination of having the cutting rate too high and/or the rpm too low, the blade can have lost its edge, or in terms of mechanical saws, the blade may not be seated in the machine correctly. You tend to notice it quite quickly though unless you're going through the material fast, and several of those causes produce a stratum-like cutting surface with distinct layers. Or as some of the guys used to call it, a cut that's as rough as a bear's arse. I find it highly unlikely that an error that obvious reached the extent it did with very slow hand saws. I've no clue how they achieved the precise and smooth cuts we see scattered around megalithic sites, but I'm very intrigued.

[@magaman3048]

Ancient abrasive cutoff wheels. I envision a semi-flexible wheel or compressed fiber disc rotated at a high RPM on a wooden shaft via series of leather belts. It would’t be terribly difficult to manually spin such a large wheel to a high RPM with a series of belt driven shafts, and like modern concrete and stone cutting methods they probably used a water based coolant to keep the dust down

[@Rekaert]

@@magaman3048 I agree the RPM could be attained, especially if you assume a geared system, which is not inconceivable. Some of the cuts are on pretty huge surfaces, so logically we'd have to assume either the cutoff wheel was moving over a stationary surface in a precise path, or more likely the surface was being moved beneath a fixed cutoff wheel. That could be done if it were within a prebuilt jig to attain a level of consistency where blocks are intended to be a specific set of dimensions. The question then becomes, what material was the cutoff wheel made from, how durable was it, how reproducible was it with technology of the time, and can be be reproduced today. Pretty fascinating subject.

[@magaman3048]

@@Rekaert yes great questions and I’ve been thinking about this the last hour or so. Likely some form of a compressed papyrus plant which I believed grew along the Nile. Perhaps mixed with a fine granular powder or similar abrasive mix with a holding agent or glue, not too dissimilar from the way those modern cutoff wheel discs at Home Depot are made. They are pretty flimsy in every way except the hard abrasive edge. They are especially flexible which would account for the way the cut marks drift on their sloppy cut in the video. I mean those flimsy paper discs will easily cut through a granite counter top, and yet I can tear them apart with my hands. It’s all about RPM

[@MarcMartino]

The tools are 90 meters underground just like the 40 thousand vases, bowls and containers cut to the width of a playing card found under saqquara.

[@burtpanzer]

Also, the material may have shifted causing the blade to bend slightly before binding and snapping off the the slice or lid.

[@stephenh7336]

This instantly reminded me of my 1st tour in Iraq. We were using a concrete cutter to cut out and repair a part of an airline runway. About half way through and in less than a minute it started veering off the line and we couldn't correct it and bring it back. We had to stop the cut, start a new plunge and try again. And this was just concrete with steel reinforcements, not solid stone. The cutter was a wheeled machine about the size of a garden tiller with a Diamond tipped 36 inch blade. In fact by trying to force a correction of it veering off, we bent the blade and it cost over 1k of our platoon's budget to replace it.

[@patriciabock4299]

I keep thinking about the stone cutters of today that have stated they cannot replicate a lot of the cuts in these stones with a laser. Great to hear of someone else that was in pavements in the military. I was the first female pavement specialist to serve at Carswell in Fort Worth Texas. 1974 was not a good year for a female to tell a male what to do on such a job lol. Luckily the guys I worked with found out that I was capable of over seeing jobs and that I always worked as hard as they did.

[@bragekv9937]

You get of the line by going to deep and pushing to fast. You need to let the blade do the work and save your body 😁 I use a similar tool for my work in construction. You can turn back onto the line but you need to make a really wide turn. Sounds like you guys were pushing the equipment a little to hard if you bent the blade😅

[@psycronizer]

@@bragekv9937 Dr. Bender Squatina and Beluga all the fucking way ! super lightweight and cut like a hot knife thru butter. I've used chainsaw with diamond bit chains, hydraulic saws, twostroke with 60 cm cutting wheels the works...

[@stephenh7336]

@@bragekv9937 Yeah, that was our first time using the machine and we tried like a 6 or 8 inch plunge ( been 17 years so can't remember for sure). I know we switched to 2 inches at a time and repeating and it worked like a charm.

[@swickens930]

@@patriciabock4299 if a stone cutter in modern day says they can't cut a stone for the pyramids then they are shitty stone cutters lol. We built the cathedral's, which are WAY more advanced, and taller than the pyramids, with basic hand tools. The tools used to build the cathedral's are essentially JUST as primitive as the Egyptians

[@henrywight4057]

Jimmy the fact that it went that far without being noticed suggests thatcit was either moving very rapidly or it was an automated process that was not being closely monitored.

[@hartsickdisciple]

Like others have said, the most likely explanation is that the ancient Egyptians we attribute the work to didn't cut the stone at all. That's why they didn't leave any tools or illustrations which explain it. They didn't know either.

[@Neodymigo]

A cut going astray like those examples is typical of a wire saw. We still use them today. A brass wire will cut granite, albeit slowly….you can try it, buy some brass snare wire in a sporting goods store, tied to a couple of handles….Egyptians would have had some kind of wooden machine to make the wire motion continuous…Never found any examples ? Wood rots and bronze would be in high demand for remelting, neither would be laying around after construction.

[@RRaucina]

And such a trade and technology would be guarded like a nuclear weapon. Thus the lack of data

[@ninoboizic1167]

Melt a huge saw so you can recreate 20 small ones, so that people will be able to cut bambus sticks? If you think how tehnology works this seems highly improbable. Its like saying you create a huge truck that is able to drive cross country and when it arrives to the destination, u can use all its parts to recreate 20 smaller cars. You know how advanced and smart you would have to be to acomplish this? Or as you suggest, the first generation cut huge granit boxes, so that next generations will use the same material to cut wood.

[@bunnytail1370]

That's probably why no evidence of tools is found. It was melted down to create other items.

[@Krsnik666]

@@ninoboizic1167 you clearly misunderstood what he was saying.

[@JNCressey]

Will just a plain wire cut? Or does it need teeth or cutting gems?

[@KharBrons]

As a contractor, I know cutting granite cleanly and accurately is extremely energy intensive. Regardless of who you are, how you're doing it, or what year it is. Period. We aren't going to manifest some wacky idea that allows less energy to be expended to perform this task. My first thought is NOT that the Egyptians had power tools, or aliens swooped in and gave 'em some fancy cubes to stack like babies. My first thought is that there was a level of automation to allow these sorts of tasks to be done to some extent without human interference. You want a straight deep cut made in some stone? Sure, you could have two dinguses sit there for 10-12 hours a day hacking away, OR, you can have a simple water-powered system that cut the blocks for you, and those two same dinguses can now manage the system instead of the stone. I don't have an answer for what that system looks like, because I'm not an Egyptian from thousands of years ago. We can only speculate. I do know that regular people made that block cut, and it got screwed up. Until proven otherwise, they didn't have access to advanced tools. So either this mistake made it past at least 2 people staring at this block being cut for hours and hours, or the cut was made over the same amount of time without supervision. Its either an error passed down to the unskilled labor dragging the tool back and forth because they didn't know any better or assumed everything was fine, or you have a level of automation that allows errors like these to happen occasionally between inspection.

[@RRaucina]

Indeed, water power would be the key to these stone cuts. They had the water [Horsepower] and they had the skills - look at the items in Tut's tomb - they were skilled artisans and artists. Why the technology was never depicted in tombs would indicate a secret society of persons like the Masons protecting their trade. They must have had a system of wire cutters, but as we say, I don't what sort and how it worked.

[@Acheron666]

Even just drilling into granite is a mission. I’ve burned out many an electric drill motor doing that.

[@stigerking9838]

@@RRaucina it wouldnt be wire, there is already plenty if thoerys that they used large copper water powered wheel saws. I dont know why this video doesnt mention it...

[@GodwynDi]

Working in an office, two line workers not noticing, or not caring, about the error until it was too late is entirely plausible.

[@everythingisalllies2141]

so they made cool water powered machinery which at that time, would have been like rocket science, yet failed to ever record anything about these incredible machines? not a single mention of it anywhere? not a single piece of the machinery, yet they did leave wooden parts in tombs such as thrones, masks, tables and chariots,, just not any of the rocket science machinery..... that automatically cuts stone? And then once they completed work on the pyramids, they all, as a nation, forgot how they did it, not passing the knowledge in to later generations? Yeah I can believe that.

[@goldminorsanchez7769]

Notice how the entire outer part of the box was shaped prior to their attempt to make the cut that would produce the lid to the box. That is quite a trick in itself.

[@tbthedozer]

Lol Jimmy’s thought at 9:40 was mine most of the way through the video… if the Egyptians drew everything but there’s no drawing that leaves a couple potential answers, 1 it was removed, 2 we haven’t found it yet, 3 they didn’t do it… 😳😂😅

[@RPLAsmodeus]

I'd be interested to know if the inside face of the cut is flat or curved, that way we would know what shape of cutting implement that was used. I am of the opinion that the blocks were mechanically cut, with a waterwheel system or something similar, driving the cutting blade. My issue with the idea of copper tools being used is, where's all the copper dust? Surely that many blocks being cut with copper tools would leave mountains of copper dust that would permeate the surrounding landscape.

[@per2]

great thinking, about the copper dust, would there be still any evidence after few thousand years ?

[@lorinrobbins7911]

There’s stone that has circular cut marks that are smooth. Plenty of pics and vids. I spent 3 weeks there, and I can only fathom a modern approach. But two guys dragging a copper saw through a rock? Look at the hideous cut they made in the demonstration.

[@billy-joewatts8583]

wouldn't they resmelt the copper to remake more tools?

[@benistingray6097]

@@billy-joewatts8583 Well, are you the one whos going to collect all the copper dust in the middle of a desert. And even if you would collect the most copper, there would still be more than enough you couldnt collect which we should be able to find.

[@grantteaton1727]

@@per2 I would think they would be able to compare copper content of the soil with surrounding areas and at least see if there are elevated levels. I also assume they would be able to drill some sort of core sample way down deep and there should be elevated levels of copper in the level corresponding to when the pyramid was built. But, that being said, the idea of using copper tools to make the pyramids is so laughably unbelievable that I doubt anybody would pay to fund such a study because they already know the answer is no. And Zawi Hawass will probably say the Egyptians were master coppersmiths that not only made the pyramids with copper tools but made the tools to such a high degree of quality that they produced zero copper dust because they never broke down, or something similarly absurd.

[@a.j.b.8658]

The BBC are still pushing the old ideas.. Jimmy, I recognise how brave you are to say the things you do. Keep it up! You deserve many more viewers than you have!! Graham Hancock is good too.

[@annedrieck7316]

14th doctor

[@mhenrique4860]

@@annedrieck7316 The british... always on an agenda

[@patrickmcdonald8513]

One of the important factors about the Egyptians not annotating how they cut stone is so overwhelmingly obvious it is easy to miss. It must have been so ubiquitous not only to them but to everyone in the region... and many before them. Clearly it was ubiquitous to them due to the amount of stone blocks they used that goes without saying. But it must have been very ubiquitous throughout the ancient world. So much so they didn't feel a need to explain it.

[@bGzzzzz]

Maybe they had some sort of mechanism that shot sand at a high speed, cutting through this with ease - considering there’s an abundance of sand around…..

[@richfrank1255]

It shows how important measure twice cut once is .

[@jamesmcguire5312]

Something you might consider is that these massive structures were all that was left of the civilization before the flood. Surely the flood so massive would have wiped out small things like paper records and stuff like that it’s obvious that they had some type of super technology but that cannot stand up against a worldwide flood.

[@smakkdat]

Best comment here, needs more likes

[@krisjost988]

You mention “the” flood like there was only one. There’s compelling evidence that there were many catastrophic flood events from asteroid and comet impacts. Records kept on hardened materials and stored in secret chambers under megalithic structures may still be in existence. If ancient records exist and have been discovered they likely tell a tale that the powers that be want kept secret anyway.

[@jvyeknom]

Like Stonehenge

[@jimmyparris9892]

Some of the megalithic structures around the world look like they've been tossed around like a child's building blocks. Some of them are at fairly high altitudes. A super massive, worldwide flood could have done it.

[@alden1132]

Craftsmen guilds and individual artists throughout history have closely guarded the secrets of their craft, so it's not at all unreasonable that even widely used techniques might have been lost. One other point: there are other ways to use metal to cut stone than just in the form of a saw. For example, cables and abrasives are used to this day to cut huge blocks of marble. Even ceramics could have been used to cut stone, as they are used even today to cut TITANIUM!

[@pGfLexed]

cutting titanium with ceramic only works in high temperatures and special setups... I doubt they used that 4000 years ago. It is highly questionable that the pyramids were built 5000 years ago, looking at human nature its far more plausible that the pharaos simply lied about the origin to make themselves bigger than they actual were..

[@djslip_irie]

Mason walks into Egypt... Asks.. how'd you move that 200tonne stone.. gets answer.. 🤣.. Mason does his own homework.. Mason leans techniques deemed "secret".. and here we are today. It's called sacred geometry.

[@currentresident8101]

Any great scientist will happily use the term "I don't know" as that means there are avenues to explore and, for any honest and honed scientist, this should be exciting!!

[@doc2help]

The hubris of many Egyptologists is a stark contrast to the almost total absence of documentation in the so-called records of the putative time when these spectacular works were completed! Thanks, Jimmy!

[@cannedheat2264]

It’s gonna happen again. Most knowledge is uploaded to the internet. If a event weee to occur that set us back. Imagine all the knowledge lost. Yes we still have books. But fewer people read books these years.

[@justinbellpa]

Jimmy brother definitely have backup platforms like odysee, rumble, etc. Would love to hear your thoughts on things in a live stream. Ministry of Truth be damned! Decentralized information keep it free

[@a.j.b.8658]

Me too 😊

[@clintbillton2161]

Is there really a Minister of truth? ..I wouldn't be shocked.

[@lochnessspeedwerkz6557]

@@clintbillton2161 Yes there is! Its called the egyptian ministry of antiquities.

[@justinbellpa]

@@clintbillton2161 have u never read Orwell's 1984 book? Its very real and today they are known as "fact checkers" as well as this movement jimmy has talked about stopping ppl from seeing some of these sites

[@viracocha03]

He did start an odysee account, and others.

[@levit7864]

Thank you for adding perks to your Patreon. I have been wanting to join for a long time. All the best Patreons engage the community through the app!

[@mrlewis4946]

Meh … I figure that actually watching the adds will do just as much for him.. as long as you make sure to leave a like and a comment

[@3rd_ear]

it would be great if someone calculated how much copper was needed for saws in official version for the great pyramid, as it is soft and wears off a lot when cutting granite. another angle to look at problems in the established tale.

[@danielabdalla8488]

One experiment had 50g copper to 90g of granite. For a pyramid of 6500000 tonnes, they'd need 3600000 TONNES of copper

[@xisotopex]

@@danielabdalla8488 the pyramids werent built with 6500000 tonnes of granite. they were built with a combination of materials with granite in the minority, mostly limestone.

[@danielabdalla8488]

@@xisotopex ok, so what, 30g of copper?

[@grey3247]

The great pyramids are made of sandstone, a very soft type of rock, not granite, which is much easier to cut and work with

[@MrSamschan]

The off-set cut looks like what a distracted worker would do working at the sawmill on a plank of wood, oops.

[@MysticalSkyMonkey]

You can imagine a mechanical stone cutter that is powered by flowing water. Even if it didn't cut very fast, you could start it off cutting a stone and do other things while it slowly went through. If it went off course some how and no one was there to correct it, it could result in something like the sarcophagus in the video. The method of cutting didn't necessarily have to be so fast that when the cutter went off-track the mistake happened so quickly there was no time to stop it. Either way, there's no way they used copper hands saws. Keep it up bro

[@donlawler9510]

my thoughts exactly. They may have left it going through the night - and found an unpleasant surprise in the morning.

[@MelbaOzzie]

The critical point is the materials of construction of the saw. Obviously it was not copper. Once we know what the saw was made of, it becomes pretty easy to figure out multiple different ways to use those materials to cut the stone.

[@RRaucina]

Water powered pit saws for cutting wood still exist, barely, and in museums. Seems that it could apply to stone as well with a feeder of water and cutting medium. Or they had a well hidden technology of wire abrasive saws that we will likely never know of. But the aliens were not needed, only time and pressure.

[@pGfLexed]

@@MelbaOzzie however no tool of labor was ever found. A catastrophic event such as a flood (north africa looks like the product of a tsunami large enough to roll over the whole continent, hence all the sand and all the aquatic fossils found there) could have easily swept all evidence therefore where we really need to look is the ocean floor at the west coast of north africa

[@blackwolf4653]

Nice but you just made this up.

[@Badboyteddybear]

The reason the Egyptian 's never left knowledge of stone cutting granite is because they never built anything in granite. ALL these structures were there when the Egyptian 's found them.

[@ThatKyGirl1]

I agree!

[@sidneywilliams5983]

How can we know for sure?

[@sandman8993]

@@sidneywilliams5983 we can’t it’s all speculation and conspiracies

[@thesullivanstreetproject]

I have no evidence of this, but it’s what my gut tells me. That kind of project would have been a massive undertaking, and any proud ruler would make sure to leave evidence of his having accomplished it to show future generations as propaganda. But there’s NO evidence even beginning to talk about it. I wonder if it was accomplished by the pre-flood Nephilim and their inter dimensional fathers who obviously knew a ton about science…

[@j.k24]

you cant date humanity with ages such as copper age, iron age and such iron get eroded after many years .. traces to find iron tooling will be very difficult but i think there was, just like Atlantis for example a pre-ancient civilisation that have truly existed .. i belief there is still allot to find underneath the sands of the sahara

[@jamiecosgrove1950]

i was a table saw operator for many years. the blade traveled over 100 mph. i have a portable model in the garage.

[@stormrungaming]

I hate how people say this was hand cut.. like they would continue cutting for days before they realized.

[@NineteenEighty-Four]

General Electric has a proprietary wiresaw process that could rapidly cut garnett-level hardness using a spool of steel wire (a web of wire actually) and a diamond powder slurry (using PEG 400 as a liquid carrier). Wire tension and material feed rate was key, but we experienced cutting errors, like that box, if certain parameters were not closely monitored and accounted for. The diamond powder was in the 4 micron mean particle size range and eventually would dull due to abrasion and "swarf" sticking to the microscopic cutting edges. We also had a reclaim process using acid to clean up the diamond powder for short term re-use. When looking at a cut like that we all assume it was a blade or laser (and it certainly could be) but the process I have experience with is very efficient and accurate to within 10 microns (or about 1/10 the diameter of human hair).

[@jimmyparris9892]

Well, they certainly had enough sand for the abrasive, provided the desert wasn't a forest when the pyramids were built

[@NineteenEighty-Four]

@@jimmyparris9892 Sand huh.

[@jeffjorczak]

Would it be possible to have a loop of rope on pulleys rotating very quickly, and use it to rub sand into the groove? Would the rock or rope wear away first?

[@NineteenEighty-Four]

@@jeffjorczak The problem with sand is that it is not appreciably harder than the material being cut. The material itself damages the cutting medium (and the rope would certainly not last and this will be noticed by a rapidly diminishing kerf and rope breaks). With your theoretical rope and pulley method, a lack of rope speed and constant tension would be two of the biggest hurdles in the process to overcome. Speed greatly aids the cutting action and tension allows the cut to remain true. I mean it's possible given enough time and labor, but without better materials (like diamond and steel) it would be incredibly inefficient and you would catch mistakes far sooner than shown in the video. As Jimmy notes, it had to have been a very fast cutting process to go that far before noticing, and I tend to agree.

[@51panhead91]

I like this idea. Thinking outside of the box is key to getting answers.

[@patrickcombs3567]

Who we've seen depicted painted on walls in Egypt did not build much of anything. The flood wiped out the builders and those that survived were far and few between and died before they could teach enough people to even remotely come close to bringing back the lost ways.

[@damedesmontagnes]

I think that they might have had a concrete type of material that was easier to work with than soid rock. I think they might have also harnessed natural energy such as sun, steam, water, wind, etc. with mills, turbine type machines that could have powerrd a high power saw. They had a lot of sand in the desert. Sand can be made into 'concrete,' and glass, so they probably also had glass lenses that could focus light creating a type of laser.

[@michaelmorris6575]

Very interesting video! Thanks for sharing.

[@moosemcgillicuddy7585]

I believe that a small number of powerful people already solved this mystery. The problem is that they believe telling the public just exactly what it is that they've discovered would be upsetting to the status quote so it's hidden from us.

[@scottjohnstone6204]

Duh .

[@krzysztofzpucka7220]

"Truth should be searched with a simple heart; it will be found in nature; it must be told only to decent people. By ignorance of or by contempt for this first condition, exotericism spread unrest into mankind."

[@RADkate]

i hate the stonecutter-society keeping the cost of gravestones high smh my head

[@moosemcgillicuddy7585]

@@scottjohnstone6204 Did you really reply, Duh? I'm so laughing at you...

[@scottjohnstone6204]

@@moosemcgillicuddy7585 Duh!

[@jasongtivr6]

What catches my eye is the fact the smaller side broke of right when the direction of the cut changed. I use saws every day at work. When one side brakes off when cutting it throws the pressure off and can change direction like that one. So yes it was cutting fast. Cutting throw that block in less than 30secs

[@tylerryckeghem5987]

You know what blows my mind... so I'm an iron worker/blacksmith and when I cut anything with rotation cutting or reciprocating cutting tools to matter how slow you cut there's always "drag lines" you can see where material is removed and in what direction. UNTIL you break out something moving so incredibly fast that it polishes with its cutting blade as it moves. I'm no stone Mason but.... slow cutting methods don't add up for this conundrum.

[@kingcosworth2643]

It would be interesting to see if there is a radius at the end of the cut.

[@morejasonmoore]

The reason that people still proclaim old false claims, like bronze saws quickly cutoff granite is the same reason people choose to risk hell as opposed to even considering something more: fear and anxiety of losing control. The ignorant remedy to fear and anxiety is asserting and dominating control over others.

[@TempleoftheSon]

I was exploring the creek in front of my house with my two sons the other day and we found a gigantic piece of limestone with a perfectly straight 2.5" bore straight through it from one side to the other probably close to 2' long. No idea how or why it was made, but it looked exactly like the drill holes we see in the granite blocks from ancient Egypt.

[@lasercat538]

Could you upload a video of it to your channel? I'd love to see it. Near my creek there's huge concrete cylinders but I'm pretty sure those were used for the water plant that's right next to me

[@natewilson111]

Could've come from an old mill nearby?

[@TempleoftheSon]

@@natewilson111 there used to be a mill I think, but it was down stream from where I found this.

[@TempleoftheSon]

@@lasercat538 I will try when we have better weather. Right now its 53°F and rainy.

[@lasercat538]

@@TempleoftheSon I'm in Indiana and there was snow on the ground this morning with a small bit of rain. I want the weather to get a bit better so I can go looking for mushrooms

[@sirguy6678]

Great video! Has any “Egyptian history experts” ever asked a rock cutting expert “how they would do it?”

[@Tbonyandsteak]

Dont think they have, since they are so full of them self.

[@metasamsara]

A mason would split cut some tiles by precutting it and then breaking it to finish the job. That would explain how this could have been precut and then broke wrong. The same way you precut a tree trunk before chopping it down to control which side it falls towards

[@PatriciaSLay]

It has to be something that cuts through like it's melted butter. Yet it shows no signs of being burnt. Has to be a chemical that can melt through granite.

[@JPEight]

Apparently not, and neither has Jimmy by the sounds of things...

[@Yves95128]

Well, now there is synthetic diamond coated blades and powered tools, they (Egyptians of that era) had nothing able to do that, it supposedly dates from the Bronze age.

[@Grunchy005]

1:30 Saw cut rate of 4mm per hour isn't bad given these were out-of-shape scientists testing a hypothesis. Do that kind of work for a month or two and your output will be a lot faster! As a matter of fact it looks completely feasible and was the type of tool depicted in their artwork. Checks out to me.

[@williamangeles9761]

He is starting to see something weird is going on in the science and archeologist community.

[@djmossssomjd8496]

I'd imagine as an ex engineer that whoever cut those stones used something similar to a bandsaw...and they do 'run off' sometimes, especially if trying to make 'em cut too quickly. More important to me is...how the hell did 'they' make the internal machining. The tight 90 degrees and corners? Oh and as I said last time...it wan't the Egyptians who did this work! Finally I 'support' channels like this by commenting, clicking and viewing. I resent being made to feel a second class person because I can't afford to fund your hobby!

[@Sobeewan]

Correction. No one is making you feel anything but your own interpretation of what he is doing. Stop being a victim and empower yourself by not watching if you believe you are being made a second class citizen...otherwise you are a masochist who enjoys being belittled while you crybully about it.

[@MW66VB]

well while it may be a hobby, The amount of time creating and producing the videos. as well as possibly having to pay someone else to complete the production work is labor. That time, making something to present to you, takes a lot of time. Time is money. If you support capitalism, then cut the guy some slack.

[@eclipse369.]

@@MW66VB he would be better off selling his photo collection That's something I'd buy.

[@MW66VB]

@@eclipse369. when you watch TV, those shows are paid for by advertisers. When people produce content on here, that entertains or informs you, they are working. They, are the company. If they have no advertisers, then they look to those enjoying it for support so they can continue. It's no different than watching a movie. you pay for it. one way or another. Or, do you feel entitled to be provided this for free all the time? Sounds like a Taker to me.

[@Stark-lu6hi]

I wholeheartedly agree. Having been in Egypt and going to the museum, pyramids, seeing the sarcophagus up close and laying in the sarcophagus myself, I can definitely say that what ever they used to cut those blocks and the formations that they made, is something that is definitely lost to modern day civilization. Their preservation techniques, design, technological innovations and mathematics is something out of a science fiction novel. You cannot help but marvel and ponder the how and the why when you see those marvels up close and in person.

[@shallongregerson]

We have lost a lot of our ancient knowledge… we stopped using our old systems for many reasons … money truly changes humanity

[@hotairsaloon]

I've been thinking about this problem for months now and researching different methods of cutting stone. One of the things that stood out to me the most was the smooth glazed finish on their diorite statues, which demonstrated that, not only could they cut and carve stones smoothly, a feat we have yet to accomplish, but they had the ability to MELT these same stones. After months of looking into bizarre things like giant concave mirrors, I came across something that is technologically feasible for an ancient civilization but also sufficiently effective to achieve the results for which we have direct physical evidence. It's called an oxygen lance or a thermal lance. If you blow oxygen through a steel tube filled with steel rods and heat the rods to a high enough temperature, it produces a concentrated, ultra hot flame that can literally cut through stone in seconds. All that is required to accomplish this that we don't have evidence of the Egyptians possessing is pure, pressurized oxygen. That being said, we know that pure oxygen can be obtained by electrolysis and then compressed manually. We also know that ancient civilizations understood and harnessed electricity (ie the Baghdad battery). Judging by the complexity of the structures built, it's a bit silly to claim that there's no way the Egyptians knew about oxygen and had the technology to collect and harness it. This is the best explanation I've been able to come up with. The mirrors are just absurd and every other explanation is fundamentally insufficient.

[@avus-kw2f213]

Have you watched this video yet ? kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2m9eYyNocpjeqc

[@hotairsaloon]

@@avus-kw2f213 Have you watched the video you're commenting on?

[@TonkyTronicus]

Oxalic acid

[@larryted2895]

@Ben Todd I like your Idea with the oxygen lance. They might have used a method without pure, pressurized oxygen and smaller metal scraps instead of a rod. I came across this video (kzbin.info/www/bejne/e3KQh3aXd7qmeaM) on how to make a portable thermal lance and he had a clip with burning steel wool spinning around producing sparks that you also need for a thermal lance. Im sure the Egypts didnt know how to make steel wool, but maybe small metal scraps are viable aswell to operate a thermal lance without pure, pressurized oxygen? Maybe the same sparks can be achieved with bronze or copper too? Just some thoughts✌

[@hotairsaloon]

@@TonkyTronicus after looking into it, this does seem like a highly plausible explanation as well. Acids can make granite and diorite soft enough to polish with cloth. Thank you for the comment. This was incredibly helpful.

[@robertholland6012]

Absolutely fascinating, thanks Jimmy

[@AbdulRWatches]

The people that think we are at the highest of our technological advancement couldn't be any more wrong, thanks for the great video.

[@eclipse369.]

seems we are in like a fallout type technological advancement as in we lost the old ways of knowledge but found news ways the old ways were far superior and much more earth friendly

[@sash4all]

Impressive, that's one example I starting to doubt of everything they teach in schools about human history👍

[@1972dsrai]

It's literally staring us all in the face, you make a great point. How could they not have seen the misalignment days sooner?

[@Stichting_NoFap]

Unbelievable, already 109 dislikes. Probably from all the institutions who disagree with your ideas. Great video.

[@Stichting_NoFap]

@@Eyes_Open I don't think he is trying to say that the popular theories are false, but that we should be open to different ones as well.

[@Just_Be_Honest]

How are you able to see dislikes?

[@Stichting_NoFap]

@@Just_Be_Honest Using an extension called 'return youtube dislike'.

[@joshuawilliams8921]

I have always found in my own research as well that the taught technology progression of humans is fundamentally wrong, even in our close history times such as steel being prevalent in some cultures where it is non existent in others or gunpowder in use when they haven’t even got steel. So you are right there may be construction methods they had that out paces ours without even being out of the copper age or with the fact multiple catastrophic events have happened in the history of mankind may have wiped out a civilization that was far more advanced. A lot of people forget 20000 years is a long time and even with today’s society after 20,000 years little to no evidence would be left of us after a global cataclysmic event. Which as you stated before the younger dryas was.

[@PeterKoperdan]

Why 20K? I thought the the dryas thing was around 10K years ago..

[@joshuawilliams8921]

@@PeterKoperdan About 11-12 thousand in fact 20k can completely erase a civilization. At around 10k to 15k granite and other hard, where massively degraded, will still exist. Of course this will leave you with ruins with no context of how or why they were made.

[@PeterKoperdan]

@@joshuawilliams8921 I understand. I just wanted to know why you quote the 20K figure, when the dryas thing happened 12K years ago as you say...

[@johnappleseed936]

Pretty much. All we ever find today is few remains only in places where somebody could’ve survived such events such as caves

[@richsanders1934]

What is that scored line that the cut is following? Could it be that they were following a plan that they later figured out it was wrong?

[@spike8007]

I can't help but to think that they just had some kind of very large stone saw. From the shape of that cut. It just reminds me to much of it.

[@JayIngemar]

I think the pyramids were built by an ancient civilization that predates even the egyptians by a couple of thousands of years. The Egyptians simply settled there and used the massive structures they found and carved the hieroglyphs in after.

[@SamadhiGuitar]

You ought to get a couple of these “experts” on the horn and ask them directly why they are pushing these ridiculous narratives.

[@kaitlinhaws7013]

K2019 is a great theory that makes a lot of sense. I think they are wrong in a few spots, like it happening 4500 bc and not 35000 bc, but they answer all the difficult questions. Like stone cutting and transporting. It makes outlier artifacts, like this one, less of an outlier once you can support advanced knowledge in and around stones like this.

[@Daedricbob]

The copper saw theory is easy to support or disprove just by testing that stone to see if there are copper traces left in the cut - it's such a soft metal it would have left a lot if itself in there and as it wasn't completed, it couldn't have been polished out of the cut area.