This Christian Just Didn't Get It!

Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @hamzasden
© 2022 Hamza's Den All Rights Reserved
Please support us by donating. Jazak'Allahu Khairan to you all
Paypal: www.paypal.com...
Patreon: / hamzasden
Social media
Facebook: / hamzas-den-10066183176...
Twitter: / hamza_den
Instagram: / hamzasden4
TikTok: / hamzasden
Videos Edited & Channel Managed by: Ben Iqra

[@rashfarid3291]

“You believe that the biography of Jesus was revealed to Jesus”. !!!!!! 👏👏👏👏

[@elbiielbii7418]

@ 13:00 hamza quoting the Qoran the same as " the need for creed" Very powerfull

[@squadaimat2923]

The God of Abraham in the Quran condemns the trinity and that God has taken a son. Obviously God didn’t mean christian scriptures as it stand today.

[@xeeebon]

Bible is a compilation of Gossips about Jesus of unknown mathew, mark, luke, john etc Injeel is the gospels what was revealed to Jesus Christ

[@WHU63]

The gospels were written by those who WERE WITH CHRIST. Do a little research before you embarrass yourself. Matthew and John were disciples of Jesus. Another disciple Peter had his gospel scribed by John Mark ( Marks Gospel). Luke was a medical doctor who was with the disciples and apostles and who knew Jesus family. Luke also wrote Acts of the Apostles. These men had been with Jesus throughout his ministry and are primary and secondary evidence sources. Jesus was crucified and resurrected in AD 33. Earliest church leaders like Clement of Rome AD 35-99 were quoting the gospels in their own letters in the century Jesus lived. The is no Injeel. It's a figment of your imagination. Remember even your Quran didn't exist until the 7th century.

[@ulilrocky]

GOSsip and SPEcuLation. The remaining injeel teachings in the Bible are monotheism and refutation of false verses that appear later.

[@WHU63]

@ulilrocky The remaining Injeel teachings? So where is this mysterious Injeel that only Muslims talk about 700 years after Christ? Yet another figment of your imagination. You reject the divinity of Christ, the crucifixion and the resurrection. All from an unprophesied man who never met Jesus allegedly revealed by an angel who told Mary that her son Jesus would be " called the SON OF GOD" Luke 1:35.

[@hhyhnh9335]

​@@WHU63 you should actually watch the video, because your concerns were addressed. Also evidence that the authors of the Bible are unknown are in the Bible itself, if you'd cared to read it. Matthew 9:1: Jesus stepped into a boat, crossed over and came to his own town. Matthew 9:9 As Jesus went on from there, he saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax collector’s booth. Matthew wasn't the author here, and he only entered the picture from verse 9 onwards. And the author described the meeting from the third person view.

[@WHU63]

@hhyhnh9335 You've never heard about people writing in third person then? You haven't noticed that all the gospels are written in third person? Matthew according to church tradition was martyred in Ethiopia. The early Church Fathers Papias of Hieropolis mentioned that Mark wrote the first gospel and Matthew the second gospel. John Mark is also mentioned in the book of Acts. Luke who wrote Acts noted his former book ( Luke's gospel) in chapter 1. John mentions himself in the last few verses of his gospel as the " disciples who Jesus loved". It was widely regarded that John was the favourite disciple.

[@markdoughty8780]

Simply great stuff...

[@SuperFaroek]

Very informative ❤

[@ALzzanam]

جزاكم الله خيرا

[@I.M.CROW.]

Answering the title. NO THEY NEVER GET ANYTHING.

[@sammylong3704]

What is the Injeel and who wrote it. For 1400 years no Muslim can answer these simple questions.

[@Ar021]

@@sammylong3704 The book given to Jesus by God. I don’t know what ‘Muslims’ you were talking to

[@greenlight5009]

@@sammylong3704why u assuming that the injeel was a book written down? The injeel is the revelation revelead by God unto Jesus and is the revelation that Jesus taught and preached and practiced its not harder than that

[@fuuf7092]

Alhamdulillah for Islam. everything makes sense

[@hhyhnh9335]

​@@greenlight5009 funny how Christians can claim they understand the trinity but such a simple concept like the Injeel baffles them.

[@zahiromare]

The Injeel or Gospel is about the kingdom of God and not about Jesus. Christians got the wrong book.

[@bancapatola1292]

For people who don't know Islam, you need to know that Islam is a religion for all humans because the Prophet Muhammad Shollallahu 'alaihi wa sallam was a prophet sent to all humans (see the Holy Qur'an Surah 7 Al A'raf verse 158) . Allah has announced the arrival of the Prophet Muhammad shollallahu 'alaihi wa sallam to all the prophets and messengers that Allah sent. And Allah has taken the testimony of the Prophets and apostles to support and help the messenger who came to confirm what Allah had revealed to them (see the Holy Qur'an Surah 3 Ali Imran verses 81-86). Prophet Muhammad shollallahu 'alaihi wa sallam has been reported to Prophet Musa alaihi salam in the Torah and Prophet Isa bin Maryam alaihi wa sallam in the Gospel (See the Holy Qur'an Surah 7 Al A'raf verses 155-157). Prophet Muhammad Shollallahu 'alaihi wa sallam was sent as a mercy to all nature (see the Holy Qur'an Surah 21 Anbiya verse 107). The Qur'an is a light for all mankind (see the Holy Qur'an Surah 3 Ali 'Imran verse 138).

[@BenjaminSkilletskf7123]

@Hamza's Den:---Notice how Zakir Hussein talks about (Q)---Souce. Like anyone has ever laid their hands on such "source". The correct position is that (Q)--Source never existed. It is a hypothetical construct as an Aid to scholastic research and propositions.

[@VROne111]

ماشاءاللہ

[@maxmorris4562]

2:28, 5:25, 9:45, 11:48 (a), 12:14, 13:53, Injeel, jesus 14:45, 15:30 (c), 16:04 Manuscruot 23:35

[@MrNagios]

nice, thank you guys, may Allah forgive us.

[@isbieiskandar9460]

jesus preching mark luke, . gospel? it's like prophet muhammad preaching the hadits

[@Abuibraheem-k6c]

We know who narrated hadiths where they lived and how they lived and died. Mark who John who luke who they don’t even know their last names even their scholars don’t know who they were.

[@HossamBindary]

talking to this guy like talking to a Christian AI...

[@ضرارابنالازور-ز6د]

لا اله إلا الله محمد رسول الله

[@pauld8098]

When did the new testemant start and when did Old Testament start and finish?

[@WHU63]

Moses wrote the first Old Testament books in the 15th century BC. The last old testament prophet was Malachi around 200 BC. The New Testament gospels were written between 50-80 AD. Johns gospel came last because unlike the other disciples John wasn't martyred and died in AD 100 aged 94. Jesus was crucified in AD 33. The first three gospels are pre AD 60. Johns dates to AD 80s.

[@pauld8098]

@ The Old Testament started from book of genesis until the cristification of Jesus and the New Testament started after the the cristification of Jesus

[@WHU63]

@pauld8098 The New Testament begins with the four gospels which are about the birth, life, ministry, trial,crucifixion and resurrection. This testament also includes the book of Acts and revelation as well as a number of letters written by the apostles to each other and the various new testament churches.

[@pauld8098]

@@WHU63 no that the theology teaching. Yes Torah it’s the beginning of the old testament and the reste but new testament it’s not beginning from Matthew. Like theology teaching

[@WHU63]

@pauld8098 Take a bible and you'll see that there are usually 66 books total in it. There are 39 books in the Old Testament. There are then 27 books in the New Testament beginning with Matthews gospel and ending with Revelation.

[@muhammadsaad-ul-haq2210]

"ALLAH's words cannot be changed" I have a question. Why do we Muslims do not give an explanation to this ayah as something that has already been done which wasn't supposed to be and ALLAH's words that you cannot do it doesn't mean it in a sense of a a challenge but something they already did but weren't supposed to do. For example. If someone breaks the traffic light, it's clearly understood that someone is quoting the law when he says, "Hey! you cannot break the traffic signal" instead of posing a challenge. So can someone please answer this?

[@arabianknight0000]

The words of Allah can't be changed means what Allah has decreed or commanded can't be changed. When Allah says "had it not been for My word already gone forth, I would have judged the matter immediately". So Allah has already sent forth His words that decree what was, what is and what will be. It means Qadr Allah (His words) can't be changed. It's not talking about what men write.

[@muhammadsaad-ul-haq2210]

@@arabianknight0000 But then there's also naskh. So how'd you explain that?

[@ahmadfiruzofficial9928]

It started with a according to...

[@peteodonnell6219]

Ok Hamza if we don't need a testament of Jesus life and ministry, if we got it all wrong. Can you tell us what the good news is please ?

[@hhyhnh9335]

Read the Quran.

[@ep171]

What is the testimony of Jesus, whether these are his statements in red letters in the Bible or people have changed them, we can only judge if we look at the Quran.

[@myuzairy7324]

_Can you tell us what the good news is please?_ The revelation given to Jesus. Do you have it?

[@stevenjones5277]

I did what aload of utter nonsense, made up by a Pagan Arab while sitting in a cave praying to a black rock.

[@stevenjones5277]

@@ep171 Why look at something made up nearly a Thousand years after Jesus. The only proof is that Muhammad said it. Muhammad was the Donald Trump of his day, Say the LIE often and loud enough then people will eventually believe it as true.

[@duven3040]

orangutan vs bonobo vs chimpanzee

[@mohamedkaba8068]

salaam in this life you’re either intelligent or christian may Allah facilitate the understanding

[@dahmaneachour3951]

Not sure if the verse is about whether the people of the book would know that Mohamed was a Prophet. The verse is attributed to the Prophet and if allah is telling him to ask the people of the book for what was revealed to you if you are in n doubt, this must be about the quran referring confirming previous revelations to David, solomon, Moses and Jesus and vertainly not about some new laws or practices unique to Islam otherwise the people of the book wouldn't be able to approve something they didn't know or never heard of. Therefore, this verse must be referring to previous revelations like events related to previous nations and Prophets that were or are known to the people of the book. The other concern is whether this verse is relevant today, seeing all the Christian sources have been utterly and totally corrupted. Based on this can one say without the doubt that this verse was only relevant in the time of the Prophet?

[@AtrangerPassingAhmad]

Hamzah really what's the proplem on eathiast

[@christopherwells3426]

Huh

[@janrudnik6870]

Jesus turned the water into wine John 2 1-11

[@dawahproof3030]

And Allah turned disbelievers into apes and swine (S. 5.60). What's your point?

[@fuuf7092]

Let’s take the Gospel of John, the fourth Gospel. Is there good evidence to believe that what we read in John’s Gospel is a true account of what Jesus actually said and did? Up until a few hundred years ago, no-one really questioned whether John’s Gospel was historical. But with growing scepticism over the reality of God and the supernatural (a philosophical and cultural movement known as the Enlightenment), scholars began to suggest other explanations for the origins of the Gospel. Against the traditional view of the Gospel having been written by a disciple of Jesus and eyewitness to his life, death and resurrection, they argued that the Gospel was, in reality, written by someone living hundreds of years later, and hundreds of miles away. And the concepts in John, they said, were too Greek, and not Jewish enough (as the other three Gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke, were). John’s idea that Jesus was ‘God in the flesh’, for example, was said to reflect much later developments in Christian theology. So for these reasons, by around 1900, most New Testament scholars believed that John’s Gospel could not be considered as reliable history.

[@fuuf7092]

The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.” Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church. wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,

[@fuuf7092]

Ttthe doctrine of Alpha and Omega is a sad and unfortunate example of mankind’s tampering with the Word of God. It shows how doctrine is contracted by men to justify false beliefs. The phrase “Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last” (Revelation 1:11) which is found in the King James Version was not in the original Greek texts. Therefore, the Alpha Omega phrase is not found in virtually any ancient texts, nor is it mentioned, even as a footnote, in any modern translation., This phrase does NOT occur in NA28, UBS5, W&H, Souter, Majority Text, THGNT, SBL, R&P Byzantine Text, Orthodox Text, Jerome's Latin Vulgate, & the Clementine Text. The phrase only occurs in the Textus Receptus. This phrase is not even footnoted in UBS5 and UBS4. The only MSS listed as having this phrase in NA28 is the manuscript of the commentary on Revelation by Andreas of Caesarea. However, "I [am] the first and the last" occurs in P025. Therefore, there appears to be very little dispute that "I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last" is not part of the original text of Revelation at Rev 1:11. in many places, the trinitaria scribes mistraslate. e.g. they translate words that mean 'revere' or 'homage' into worship. this is truly sad that they mislead many to eternal fiya Matthew 2:11 - The NRSV correctly reads “and they knelt down and paid him homage.” The NIV has the magi worship Jesus instead of merely paying homage, most likely reflecting the piety of the translators and their audience: “and they bowed down and worshipped him.” The NIV does, however, correctly translate the same word (proskuneō) as “pay homage” in Mark 15:19, where the soldiers pay mock homage to Jesus as king. [See BeDuhn, Truth in Translation, pp. 44-45.] John 7:53-8:11, often described as “The Passage of the Woman Caught in Adultery” (passage de adultera), is famous for several reasons. The pleasant reason is that it is one of the most dramatic displays of the grace of God in the Bible. But there is also a more difficult reason that needs to be addressed: this passage was likely not in the original version of the Gospel of John, but was added later at an undeterminable time and for an unknown reason. How should the church treat this passage? The text-critical evidence is overwhelming: this passage was almost certainly not in the original version of the Gospel of John. This is hardly an answer, however, but an entirely new question. For nearly every contemporary Bible, even if the text is given double-brackets or italicized or given a smaller font, contains this passage, thereby declaring to today’s reader that it is part of the Gospel of John

[@fuuf7092]

Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.

[@janrudnik6870]

The injeel was a pamphlet that got misplaced

[@fuuf7092]

Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.

[@fuuf7092]

Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.

[@fuuf7092]

What about “He who is without s77n, should k4st the f1r5t”? On the other hand, every other early manuscript omits it, notably including two of the earliest and most reliable manuscripts, called Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75 that date from the second or early third century and were found in Egypt (closer to where John wrote). Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest complete copy of the New Testament (c. 325 CE), does not include it either. No pastor or theologian from the eastern side of the early church references it until the tenth century. In their commentaries and sermons, they go directly from John 7:52 to 8:12 (keep in mind that current chapter and verse breakdowns were added later). Finally, all the earliest translations of the Greek New Testament (Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Old Latin, and Georgian) skip this story as well.

[@WHU63]

​@@fuuf7092 At his ascension Jesus said to his disciple." All authority in heaven and earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of every nation baptising them in the name of the FATHER and of the SON and of the HOLY SPIRIT.... and behold I am with you always even until the end of the age" Matthew 28 18-19 Who has ALL AUTHORITY IN heaven? What are the names of God we are baptised into? Who is there until the end of the age? Answer God, the ONE supreme being with THREE distinct persons FATHER, SON, HOLY SPIRIT. The verse is genuine because it also appears in the Didache Scriptures dating to between AD 70-100 which were the first church orders.

[@abdulrahmantaha8749]

I’m also not sure what’s the point of having a woman doing dawah with a picture of full make up on.

[@dawahproof3030]

My question to Muslims... What was the purpose of Allah revealing the Injil to Jesus if the Injil couldn't compete with the words of Paul? The Injil has to be the most useless revelation Muslims believe Allah revealed. Less than 40 years after the Injil was revealed, people had already started worshipping Jesus.

[@Noble_One]

Jesus was sent not but to the lost sheep of house of Israel. not up to us to preserve it. go ask christians what they did with eveangelion (Injeel, the Gospel Jesus was preaching not Mark, Luke, John, Mathew nobody's biographies). since they corrupted their scripture. God sent another to preserve the teachings in Quran.Quran is preserved with radio carbon dated menu scripts in original language and memorized from cover to cover.

[@dawahproof3030]

@@Noble_One Your response didn't answer the question I asked. Any other Muslim giving this guy a thumbs up for his useless comment want to give an answer?

[@areshensem]

@@dawahproof3030 he did answer the question. In summary, Injeel was meant for specific group and time, that's the purpose.

[@ryder-m5r]

the injeel was a revelation that was revealed to jesus the purpose of that revelation is to guide the isrealites at the time of jesus the isrealites at that time are the ones who meant to preserve that revelation but rather they throw it away or sell it or even destored it just like it's mentioned in the quran same thing goes with the torah that was revealed to moses so they not only failed when it comes to one revelation but also with another revelation hope you get the message

[@dawahproof3030]

@@areshensem My question is specifically about the span of time that the Injil was relevant. Almost 2000 years have passed since Jesus preached his message, and according to Muslims, there is no trace of the Injil that the Qur'an mentions outside of the Qur'an itself, yet Paul's letters, which were written during the same period as the Injil, were copied and are preserved to the present day. So what was the purpose of Allah revealing the Injil to Jesus when the Injil couldn't even outlast the letters of Paul?

[@koroglurustem1722]

Brother Hamza, may Allah be pleased with your work! But I strongly advise as your Muslim brother to tone down your intensity of your interactions with others. These people join your podcast for whatever reasons and you have a perfect chance to show them the truth. However if you come across overly argumentative and aggressive, you will put your interlocutors on eggshells and they’ll be defensive rather than open to discussion. This is a simple human psychology and Allah is commanding Moses to talk to pharaoh in a polite manner despite what he has done. True, later on Moses changed the tone after he saw the sneaky and manipulative behavior of pharaoh and his council. But I would say these people joining your discussions are not pharaonic despots nor do you have repeated interactions with them where they showed their true colors. Your interactions are on off chance to clearly and politely deliver your message to these confused Christian fellows. Imagine a millennia worth of deception and confusion resting upon their judgement! Brother, you need to tame yourself and act in the character of the prophet Muhammad if you want best results! If you want to antagonize and repel your willful audience to look like a “lion”, then you keep going the way you do. We’re supposed to be “mercy to the nations/gentiles”, not a harsh judgement. Assalamu alaikum!

[@pleaselogic251]

V

[@mannychaudry6578]

Ask the Vatican Were is the injeel they have it . Why keep asking the Muslim who never made the claim on the existence of the injeel it was the lord of the heavens. Asking a Muslim were is the injeel to make it look like, you have an amazing point 😂 You don't have nothing but to gaslight a Muslim to answer something what only Allah the lord of the heavens can answer.

[@rizwanramzan5729]

The Vatican did purchase an Aramiac 4th century Gospel of Barnabas in 2010 that found in Turkey for $50 million. So I personally believe the Vatican library has the Injeel locked in its vault..Catholic church is hiding it...

[@sreno66]

Quran alone is the way.

[@stevenjones5277]

The way to Hell, glad we are in agreement.

[@williamproffitt6688]

Muslims and Christians share the same God.. Argue over the details.

[@IboGetsuu]

No thats not true😂😂😂

[@ryder-m5r]

@@IboGetsuu well actually yes that's actually true (whether you like it or not) Should we remind you what's the Aramaic word the Jesus used for god almighty ???

[@uthman2281]

Not true. It is true there is only one true God. Christins believe a man is God. We don't.

[@IboGetsuu]

@@ryder-m5r iknow Allaha. But the stupid Christians believe in 3Gods and they believe that Jesus is God astachfuallah! So Dont talk with me, ik what i'm talking about!!!

[@moojza]

Well no in the sense that we dont worship Jesus but yes as in there is only 1 God so if a Christian worships and a Muslim worships its directed to the one God. Where that God accepts the Christians or Muslims worship is a seperate detail

[@Daisy-yq1gi]

Nobody has ever asked me about the Injeel whipe doing dawah. Nobody can definitively tell me what it is because nobody knows. It's simpler to stick to the Quran. The Injeel is like the conspiracy theorists holy grail......

[@dawahproof3030]

The Injil is also like the great wall of Dhul Qarnayn which is mentioned in Surah Al-Kahf. Neither of them ever existed.

[@stevenjones5277]

I wonder if Hamza is declaring this income plus his shop work to the Inland Revenue?

[@amania6319]

Hamza lives rent free in your mind lol

[@seanou2837]

what do you care? you on welfare anyway.

[@christopherwells3426]

I'm sure he is but it's none of your damn business

[@stevenjones5277]

@@christopherwells3426 If it is not anybodies business why are you getting involved?

[@stevenjones5277]

Hamza doesn't Lie, he just changes his opinion when caught being untruthful

[@jaketwigg1065]

Where do we go when we die?

[@christopherwells3426]

Listen weasel obviously you have a problem with lying. Otherwise you wouldn't assume or accuse everyone else of lying. Make an argument! Make an argument what did he lie about. And where is the proof that he lied. Otherwise shut up

[@hhyhnh9335]

And I'm sure you have a book full of evidence which for some reason you won't ever share with anyone.

[@stevenjones5277]

​@@hhyhnh9335 There is a video on KZbin of him doing exactly that, not a book true just video evidence.

[@stevenjones5277]

@@hhyhnh9335 Also everyone is allowed to be ugly, he just abuses the privilage.

[@ALzzanam]

جزاكم الله خيرا