This Engine Will Change Aviation Forever

In this fascinating and enlightening video, we will explain the process of how the most powerful airplane engines are built. We will explain the process of making them, assembling them and how they are made. We will dive into the world of airplane engines and talk about the Rolls Royce XWB engine, GE9X engine, Pratt and Whitney F119 engine, Rolls Royce F130 engine and others. This video will be of interest to aviation and airplane engine enthusiasts. Watch this video till the end and we will tell many interesting facts about engines and aviation.
SUBSCRIBE: www.bit.ly/beyondFactsSUB
#plane #aviation
#engine #airplane
#beyondfacts

[@jacklav1]

A more accurate title for this video would be “these are some vague facts about various engines that exist”.

[@kkinva68]

serious, this may be the most scatter brained video i have ever seen

[@terryakuna66]

With regurgitated video.

[@marcosalazar4682]

Probably chatgpt generated

[@gendaminoru3195]

exactly - so tired of click bate I could scream. Usually I put a PSA about the time stamp where the relevant content begins so viewers can fast forward, but in this case I couldn't match up the title with an appropriate starting point. Worse yet, I and most people in the industry will have learned absolutely NOTHING from this video.

[@billydonaldson6483]

Derby is pronounced Darby in the U.K. We say Turbine as apposed to Turbin, the ‘e’ on the end of the word changes the ‘i’ sound as in pine, shine etc.

[@marcusrawlinson5024]

I thought he was talking about Seikh head gear, I was very confused:]

[@dextermorgan1]

Tomato tomato

[@awaldron7743]

Good for you!

[@adoreslaurel]

In My fair Lady, Henry Higgins says "English! the Americans haven't used it for years".

[@scottburns1992]

I came here for this comment. Is he winding us up on purpose?

[@ZeroSpawn]

Wow, excellent video! I didn't expect the surprise half way through!

[@platanoymangu]

So, what engine will change aviation forever? He talked a lot but did not say much.

[@TesterAnimal1]

He literally mentioned it in the first sentence!

[@rdspam]

The XWB! It starts with an idea! Then stuff is put together! They use computers! And they test it? No, wait! It’s the GE9X. It has new stuff! Test cell 44! No, the F135! Engineers carefully designed it! Then they built it! They track all the parts! No, the F130! They paid attention to building them!

[@John-bv2ft]

Love RR

[@joeretired4552]

Very impressive manufacturing and testing.

[@ivortoad]

It's English. Like the language.

[@gilliantracy7991]

Excellent video!

[@donrobinson6613]

Rolls Royce had dual Conway engines on the Vickers\BAC VC-10 in the 1960's

[@mrparlanejxtra]

A turbun is worn on the head. A turbine, rhymes with wine, dine and shine.

[@paul70uk]

Turbin!

[@mrparlanejxtra]

Shmerbin@@paul70uk

[@Michael.Chapman]

While we’re on the issue Derby, England is pronounced “Darby” :-)

[@mrparlanejxtra]

Perhaps that is because people there are a bit posh?@@Michael.Chapman

[@mizzyroro]

Tomato tomato.

[@ashfaq1999]

Great video.

[@bonemasterj]

"Beyond Facts" is a perfect description of something that implies ever individual engine is bird test (wrong). But the best line (3:04) is that the "new fan blades, despite being thinner...will be wider". GREAT FACTS!

[@PHALLAMP]

very good❤️️❤️️❤️️

[@nethranethra6591]

Awsome handsofffff

[@wilhelmmeyer89]

Well, nice ad.

[@michaelofarrell488]

The ten year old Boeing GE built 777 engine had 129k lbs of thrust, so did the American company Pratt & Whitney

[@robertcook2572]

It's not just about the thrust. If you had a girlfriend you'd know that.

[@ImionsaeXwb77]

@@robertcook2572 you probably like small titties.....

[@x2desmit]

@@robertcook2572 Rolls are the worst engines reliability wise of the three. This Rolls engine will change nothing.

[@tdkleffman]

exactly how does this video in any way show that aviation will be changed FOREVER???

[@csjrogerson2377]

Dont think its gonna change the aviation in my Cessna 172 - it wont fit!.

[@fritzwrangle-clouder6033]

@@csjrogerson2377Bolt it on the top. Go on, you can do it!

[@parttimetourist]

Glad you asked that is what I was trying to ascertain much to my chagrin

[@MajorGamersUk]

This, this was very interesting and informative. Thank you. Oh I live not far from Rolls Royce in Derby, just 40 miles away.

[@ziauddin7948]

wonderful engineering in GE 9 X engines used in Boe 777 #

[@wondimuessayas8460]

I have much respect and appreciation for such blessed minds. We Africans are are fighting for plot of lands while the blessed minds engage in such innovations

[@qpr543]

You should make an exclusive video on engine testing.

[@MaverickSeventySeven]

What a terrific, informed documentary !!! Thank you!!!

[@Brewbug]

Let's assume that to be sarcasm :)

[@MaverickSeventySeven]

​@@Brewbug- have I missed something? :-)

[@dwaynematthewtamor5215]

nice

[@invoxicated]

As a former Navy Jet engine Mechanic I worked on Pratt&Whitney TF-30 P408 engines in the early 70s. I noticed that many of the bolts on these newer engines are not safety wired together to prevent bolts from backing out and possibly causing a problem. It was a long and tedious posses and sometimes you had to use a mirror to see what your doing. Especially the combustion cans that ignited the fuel. I don't know maybe standards have changed since the 70s or are different for commercial aircraft.

[@paulmurgatroyd6372]

HOW is it going to chage aviation? It is still a liquid fuelled jet turbine.

[@grip2617]

The makers of the video grossly overestimate the capacity of 95% of the viewers to chew and process all the information given. Please, use less irrelevant superlatives and adjectives and give the speaker time to take a breath now and then. The video needs at least 45 minutes for the same contents.

[@michaelginever732]

Derby in the UK is pronounced as if spelled Darby. I know it makes no sense but it is the case.

[@fredzeppelin5508]

No probs because in the USA trump is pronounced as if spelled moron.....

[@davenone7312]

Hush Houses were a giant pain in the rear. It took so much more effort and time to do an engine run. We always found ways to not use them. (F-111 Flight Prep, Depot)

[@robertstopford1016]

It's manufactured AND assembled in the UK. And the cutting edge research and design is done here too!

[@afvet5075]

The GE engine is built in America not Europe.

[@jameskirk578]

Not much longer due to the NET ZERO B/S.

[@stoater1551]

​@@afvet5075 The RR engine is built in England, not Europe. The UK is an island, not part of continental Europe.

[@afvet5075]

@@stoater1551 No shit. Have been to Englan many times. I think you misunderstood what I am saying.

[@BenState]

@@afvet5075 just admit youre wrong

[@myriaddsystems]

Superb presentation though- I used to work at the main test facility at the National Test and Evaluation Establishment for gas turbines in Farnborough

[@suzzannewright9244]

The B in the RB engines refers to Barnoldswick in Yorkshire/Lancashire were the fan chords are made. Rolls Royce made the first stage rockets for the Blue Streak rocket project which was cancelled.

[@grahamj9101]

The RB designation goes as far back as WWII and the RB.23 Welland engine. which was Rolls-Royce's version the Whittle W.2B/23 engine that was being made by Rover. R-R took over the manufacture of the W.2B/23 from Rover, together with the Rover factory at Barnoldswick, in 1943. And any of R-R's old hands at Derby, where the company is invariably referred to as Royce's, will almost certainly tell you that the 'R' stands for Royce, not Rolls. PS You committed a capital offence: you omitted the hyphen from Rolls-Royce.

[@davidstewart4570]

Derby (where Rolls Royce engines are built) is pronounced "darby", not "durby".

[@Ozgrade3]

Beyond Facts? - this engine is already in service. Don't you really mean the Rolls Royce Ultrafan - not the XWB.

[@johnholmes7342]

Compression at 27:1 is revolutionary.

[@alainpaum]

I flew the boing 777 er recently and it is really a very powerfull engine !

[@WizzRacing]

The PW F135 produces 45k lbs of thrust now.. Not bad for such a small single engine..

[@leonardcollings7389]

Where would you hang it on the aircraft?

[@Jack-pu4rf]

A question will this engine fit in my mini cooper, I need to get it ready for the next car show

[@miketobin2324]

We humans are an amazing animal, the crazy stuff we invent!

[@SKEptic-mg2dd]

Assembly with a Crescent wrench! (0:48)! Might as well use a pipe wrench.

[@jaygeetee3364]

There’s a good chap, could you pop one in the old Jagwire.

[@tshikosiphathutshedzotshik1396]

GE9X is a rockstar

[@dilbahadur2]

clever stuff no doubt - I wonder if they can hold a tolerance of half a thou for 3 days as our EMI MEC autos could ?

[@tonyollier7098]

This channel is aptly named Beyond Facts!

[@rosewhite---]

0.56 shows the single row bearing with another hidden one that is the only support fthe huge rotating assembly has. Simple bearings are OK because the rotating assembly weighs nothing as all the weight is centrifuged off the bearings.

[@danaihuntrakul7723]

How could it change aviation; what plane sizes can take such behemoth engine?

[@razamubeen245]

Next video make in a380 engines

[@INDENTUREDTRADER]

It’s pronounced “DARBY” chief.

[@Glen.Danielsen]

Remarkable British technology! 💛🇬🇧 Also can’t wait till the B777X becomes operational. It’s said to be having developmental challenges related to the GE9X engine.

[@christopherhindle1174]

Commentary rather too excitable!

[@user-ov2gr1me2y]

The plane's "Turbin" 💀💀💀💀💀

[@MrCubflyer]

87 is moderate compared to large GE engines that go well over 120 k thrust.

[@garyhughes2446]

I believe the ge's world close to 132 or 133 thousand

[@Teluric2]

Anybody in engine design here? What computers are used on simulation design for these engines?

[@howardcobb4354]

Hate videos that do rapid cuts, giving you no chance to look at anything properly. Be nice to actually see the engines we're hearing about.

[@lastmanstanding9389]

2.33 how do they jump start an engune?

[@garybacon7629]

DERBY is pronounced “DARBY” 😂

[@mrparlanejxtra]

Yes Guv"

[@davidmontville4885]

And distance is pronounced "FARTHER"

[@ivortoad]

Not in Liverpool

[@mrparlanejxtra]

Do they speak English in Liverpool? Yes but very slowly.@@ivortoad

[@Turbo442]

They were using a crescent wrench in that video....

[@herseem]

Derby is pronounced 'Darby'

[@MarioSergioSantosOliveira]

😮😮

[@markcain9695]

And may I also add it was smaller fan diameter

[@nigelrg1]

Well, I'm changed forever!

[@wahoohoo6864]

When you are narrating about the XWB turbine you are showing the compressor.

[@PS-Straya_M8]

What are you talking about, for cold start testing they don't bring a fridge they use a freezing unit!?

[@user-ns4rm5ox6y]

Upsolutly Right & Best Big Jet Engine Made By GE Company US Country, - God Bless All, _ Thanks All, ..... Cheerio.*****.

[@rustykilt]

SO HOW DOES THE STORY CHANGE AVIATION FOREVER?

[@edwardranno7119]

It didn’t...clickbait

[@extra222love]

Rolls Royce is always the king of powerful yet quiet jet engines 👌🏼

[@mrparlanejxtra]

QANTAS are not so sure about that

[@pentameteriamb6196]

Go GE!

[@x2desmit]

No. LOL!!! The are the bottom of the reliability scale.

[@mrparlanejxtra]

Honda are getting into the market. Perhaps we will see Toyota there soon?@@x2desmit

[@Bagelrob399]

Wait a minute, where is the engine with the 15ft fan you had in the thumbnail?

[@JosephDent-qd9ih]

This is why I asked God to make me a engineer.

[@daverobert7927]

Have they found and fixed the internal heat problems in the F-35 engine

[@dusty_five_2]

No, another billion dollar contract it would take for someone to look into that to change one nut.

[@rezzer7918]

Sure Mac

[@kellyb.mcdonald1863]

You went from 98,000 pounds of thrust down to 17,000 pounds of thrust what a decrease!

[@rikardlalic7275]

Does it fly on its own or needs an airplane too?

[@billydonaldson6483]

The composite fan blades were first used by Rolls-Royce on the RB211 engines. GE had to wait for the patents to lapse before they could copy the design. The RB211 E4 was way ahead of the competition on fuel efficiency etc. Modular built engines were also copied from Rolls-Royce, they were originally designed by Bristol Siddeley, a manufacturer taken over by RR. The Olympus used on Concorde and the Pegasus used on the Harrier were Siddeley’s designs. RB stands for Rolls-Bristol.

[@gerardosalazar161]

And RR for Rolling Rubbish?

[@coreycampbell1689]

Actually Rolls-Barnoldswick

[@peterwilliams3252]

@@gerardosalazar161do I detect a bit of jealousy typical American,you have been copying the uk for years,but are to arrogant to admit it.

[@peterwilliams3252]

@@gerardosalazar161America has not got over the jet engine was a first for the uk and was given to America to copy it was invented by an ENGLISH man.sorry yanks I know you hate the truth,you all take after your president Biden.

[@wilburfinnigan2142]

And RR was over 2 years late to deliver the RB211 engine to Lockheed, nothing to brag about !!!

[@hifinsword]

I hear the pilots leaving the F-22s and F-15s (not F-15EXs) as they are decommissioned, will be transitioning to the newest and most advanced B-52s. 😄

[@thebrightstar3634]

Pls story sr 71 that's jet is my favourite airplane ever

[@user-zt4pg8cm5c]

The video flashes scenes so fast that it doesn't even give you time to focus, gives me a headache. Had to stop watching.

[@tholneou6745]

The blade works by what ?

[@John-nc4bl]

The new GE-9X engine is the most advanced engine to date.

[@dasdasdatics420]

When I was 10 I was designing turbo fan engines with contra rotating 2 stage fans and 2 stage compressors. Have the engineers still not built such machines yet ?

[@wanderschlosser1857]

No, because it's overly complex, too heavy and therefore ineffective.

[@dasdasdatics420]

@@wanderschlosser1857 Ha ha hahaha. So, they haven't built one yet, but they know it's too heavy and complicated. ?!?!?!?!

[@wanderschlosser1857]

@@dasdasdatics420 What an advantage would have a 2stage fan have? A turbofan is the more effective the more mass flow can be moved backwards with the least speed difference between fan inlet and fan outlet. That can be achieved with a 1 stage fan. A 2nd stage would not add thrust but extra weight. If you split the thrust between two stages counter rotating you need either a gearbox or two separate low pressure rotors, again that means extra weight and complexity. If you understand a little bit about turbofans you'd understand.

[@dasdasdatics420]

@@wanderschlosser1857 Contra rotating fans have been proven to increase the airflow with less loss of efficiency and using lower fuel cost. The royal navy use it in the Gannett for extended flight time and the Russians use it to power their strategic bombers. Such a system can prevent a condition similar to a propeller in the water called cavitation. Also, the design includes the use of a ducted fans which further enhances the efficiency of the fans.

[@wanderschlosser1857]

@@dasdasdatics420 Propellers like on the Gannet or Tu-95 aren't the same as fans. You can't get more thrust out by simply adding a stage. The fan needs power which comes from the low pressure turbine. For modern wide body aircraft fans we speak in the ballpark of 40-60 MW. Modern fan stages use all this power to create propulsion with very little efficiency losses. Again, what do you expect would another fan stage do? More thrust would need more power, which the core engine needs to produce in the first place. Also, the flow characteristics of two counter-rotating fans aren't trivial. You can expect huge losses by turbulences and a lot more noise. Which btw. is quite significant with counter-rotating propellers, too. Don't you think someone would have come up with a counter-rotating fan if it would make technical sense?

[@fredfred2363]

Really high NOX emissions though... 27:1 compression ratio, super lean burn with really high burn temps makes for a very efficient engine. But super high NOX, at a time where the UK is restricting cars that emit high NOX from entering big cities like London.

[@andresoteroeirasgranda5870]

Thays true. Unfortunately there no way today to avoid high NOX production in a gas turbine. Zero NOX would produce more than 2000 C in the first stage of the turbine and there is no material that supports this temperature together with the extreme centrifugal force. Maybe in the future.

[@andyharman3022]

@@andresoteroeirasgranda5870 The stoichiometric temperature limit of hydrocarbon fuels is about 1870C. Gas turbine manufacturers have been thinking about how to get there for 70 years.

[@andresoteroeirasgranda5870]

@@andyharman3022 that is with 1 Bar. But here you have a compression ratio of 27:1 . The temperarure rises a lot more.

[@andyharman3022]

@@andresoteroeirasgranda5870 It is wrong to talk about "compression ratio" in gas turbine engines. What the compressors are designed for is "pressure ratio". Compression ratio is the ratio of maximum to minimum volume in the working chamber of a positive displacement machine. Pressure ratio is the ratio of absolute pressures at the inlet and outlet of the compressor.

[@andresoteroeirasgranda5870]

Exactly. Unfortunately then we have 2700 - 2900 C. There are 2 solutions: gas dilution or heat intercooling with the exhaust gas. The first solution is used today and produces NOX. The second one is not used and would not produce NOX. Is difficult to make. You have to cool the combustion gas with the "used" exhaust gas. That will reduce the first stage temperatura up to aprox. 1300 C. The heat absorbed will then reheat the exhaust gas giving the chance to produce more power extraction from the same fuel. May be in the future will be done. Have a good night Andy. @@andyharman3022

[@JosephDent-qd9ih]

Stinson Mississippi

[@colingenge9999]

Why is the B-52 still flying when it was developed before the B1 and B2 and it still flying after them?

[@gordonwelcher9598]

Where is "The engine that will change aviation forever"? Ten minutes of everything else. Stick to the title.

[@reason43poole37]

Using a shifting spanner on an aircraft I had to pause three times to believe it?

[@PhD63]

It’s not pronounced Der Be. It’s Dar Be

[@nigelthompson874]

Strange. At 0:48 (VERY short flashed image) all seems wrong. I was told tools are never chromed in aviation. A chip of chrome in an engine could be disaster? Also it is an ADJUSTABLE spanner? Also it seems to be TIGHTENING the bolt. If so the head should be correctly in other direction. Pedantic , although isn’t that important in aviation?

[@trstquint7114]

The velocity of this engine is only surpassed by the tempo of this video.

[@justyp]

Please, you don’t have to yell….

[@pobinr]

Where large forces are involved use tons not pounds

[@LDW1961]

It's said DARBY not Derby.

[@user-ud2ze9is5h]

Yes on head windy 🍃 shiny

[@mickbutton3625]

0:49 - Do Rolls Royce use adjustable spanners ????

[@peanuts2105]

I reckon it was a PR shot for the camera teams to get some ‘B’ roll for assembly. And yes, an adjustable spanner is a last resort and only used by pikeys.

[@budburr66]

Since it's a contraction of turbo-engine, I should think that turb-ine, or turbun would be correct. Like my coworkers at Garrett used to call it.

[@curtkuhns]

And what's under the hood of your car? An eng-eyen?

[@TesterAnimal1]

Cars do not have hoods.

[@brucepickess8097]

Hood - a covering for the head and neck with an opening for the face, typically forming part of a coat or cloak. Bonnet - 1) - woman's or child's hat tied under the chin and with a brim framing the face. 2) - Vehicle BRITISH - the hinged metal canopy covering the engine of a motor vehicle. 😏🇬🇧

[@curtkuhns]

@@brucepickess8097 the Brits call that the 'bonnet'

[@curtkuhns]

I've worked on turbines my whole career of thirty years. We call them turbines. If you want the British pronunciation, fine.

[@Thinkwit]

The engine 'comprises' (its parts). It is not 'comprised of' them. The whole comprises its parts. Simple.

[@RenoLaringo]

I like how they call those new jet engines ''greener''.... What about getting to green first?

[@davidcheung8595]

How?

[@Michael.Chapman]

10:00 Is the Rolls 130 producing only 17,000 lbs of thrust per dual engine pod or a total of 34,000 lbs?

[@kimbo99]

They didnt want to exceed the thrust of the original engines because it would change the performance envelope of the plane but they do run 30pc more efficiently and thus have much greater range now.

[@Michael.Chapman]

@@kimbo99 thank you for explaining-got it!

[@afvet5075]

GE and Rolls Royce engines are the best in the world. Nobody else comes close.

[@christophercook723]

Pratt and Whitney are just as good and l am English.

[@matthewhuszarik4173]

Pratt and Whitney builds the engines for the highest performance jest in the world. Jet airlines are buses that only care about costs.

[@robertcook2572]

To be fair, other manufacturers must come close, otherwise they wouldn't exist. There's nothing wrong by being the best by a fine margin.

[@matthewhuszarik4173]

@@robertcook2572 The biggest thing is their is no criteria that is the best for all applications. Airlines want fuel efficiency they don’t care that much about total size or thrust ratio vs cross-section. Militaries cares about thrust/lb and cross sectional area.

[@afvet5075]

@christophercook723 When I was in the Air Force we had Pratt and Whitney along with Allison engine's as well as GE and they were for a time on top but since the use of the High Bypass engine's put out by GE, it just took off and most engine's used today on commercial aircraft are so much more efficient. But you are right about Pratt and Whitney.

[@JosephDent-qd9ih]

Put all the parts in a Cray II computer and auto cad to the stamping plant. Dr Dent astrophysicist Rocketeledyne owner.

[@JosephDent-qd9ih]

What would happen if you parparate each individual fan blades. Astrophysics research Dr.Dent ph.d