This is BROKEN! Crush Opponents with the #1 Deck in Marvel Snap!

[@rsBerry]

PF Bounce Turn By Turn: Turn 1: destroy (float on turn 3 into 3 cost or destroy hood/iceman) > copy > x2 > Hood (save Hood for turn 5 if PF Misery line (play him after PF and before Misery)) > Iceman > +2 Turn 2: Swan > ones in the same order unless Nico destroy and good PF revive target > Toxin Turn 3: 3-Cost scalers if Misery+PF > Beast if you'll play Swan on 4 > Swan Turn 4: Misery if destroying Cass/Copy and reviving with PF or PF if destroying Sage/Monkey (Depending on what your turn 6 looks like you can activate Swan and play 1s (sometimes not all) on 5)/x2 > Swan > Misery on Hood or bouncing Turn 5: Trigger Swan. PF/Misery if you played the other on 4 > Bouncing or Misery (on Hood and/or Iceman) Turn 6: 1s with Monkey, Sage, Cass against Arishem and/or PF The toxin replacement is Falcon and I think Nico is needed.

[@Lex_Ender]

I do appreciate that you recommend cards based on context. Telling us that are low on resources that this is good but next months things are better really helps.

[@rodgerlang884]

Honestly, context is incredibly important. Cards aren't obtained in a vacuum and making a more informed decision is never a bad thing

[@MyGuidingMoonlight]

I think you've always done a great job acknowledging context and recommending cards based solely on power. I always remember Sage week. You said she's a great card in a bad meta for her, and would be amazing as soon as it shifted. You were exactly right, and I skipped that week. Turned out that the next OTA was the shift you were talking about. Your info then was spot on, and honestly it always is by Monday. Basically, keep doing what you're doing, because you already give the best card acquisition advice in the whole the community.

[@TheLKallis]

I appreciate the context and the comments about other cards in the cache. I didn't have Thena so I believed I needed to open. My next goal, based on everything that I have seen, is to be sure that I have keys or tokens for Doom 2099.

[@samuelcahyadi2666]

I'd rather you give recommendations contextually.

[@Mawryk]

For me, I like recommendations with context. Keep up the great work!

[@nikolaidebode154]

I always look at cards in the context of what decks they go in and what cards I currently have. I think that is the way to make recommendations.

[@MrQp00]

I like the cards you suggest but I also enjoy the fact you take everything into consideration when giving your advice. I really want Goorrr

[@connorheinz15]

I like having the context to help make the buying decision

[@mithrandyr-b8y]

For the Season Pass I'll say that context is really important, that example of yours today about Malekith is proof of that, recommendations are personal opinions but if you take the time to explain all around them, we can make better decisions, great video as usual

[@1023nick]

Context, specifically the potential or longevity of a card. For instance, I took your advice on getting Skar, on the basis that the card will continue to get better, as more 10 power cards are released, and you were right! I'm using Skar more than ever now, and loving the flexibility it brings to my turn 6 plays.

[@MikeKopec]

I like the context. I find it extremely helpful. Your opinions are always appreciated

[@py_769]

i think the way you've been recommending cards has been fine. I appreciate the context aspect, on top of just the power level of the card.

[@killzcobi1476]

Hey Pulse I like context, that what makes you different and more interesting with other content creator!!

[@veggispeggis]

The malekeith discard deck from the other day is crazy. I have struggled to reach 90 for months and many times not even reached it. With this deck I got to 90 from low 70 in just a few hours over like a day or two and im still climbing relatively easy in the 90s.

[@winigarcia5682]

I personally enjoy and prefer when you recommend cards based on context. As a mostly f2p player I don’t have a huge abundance but of resources so hearing you say “hey this card is strong but there are more fun cards coming out in the future” just makes the decision to save up my keys feel so much better.

[@josephnywayfarer1345]

I like your take on cards and consideration of future cards.

[@the_1_omega10]

Great video! And I got the Matt Hardy reference lol!

[@snapjudgmentspod]

Lol nice!

[@EricCimino-g4c]

I definitely appreciate the context with the recommendation.

[@mob7177]

I think that context matter more then just power. While knowing that a card is powerful is helpful when deciding to buy it with limited resources, knowing how it compares to upcoming releases can equally if not more important.

[@Darklink2225]

Context is the most important, having the knowledge of whats to come and/or the potential for the future of the card. That said it's still good to know where the power is today for immediate usage.

[@mariapazanazco85]

Hi Glazer! 😊 Thanks for the video and decks! I'll try the Buddii ongoing and the LukeSkaarWalker decks, they're very interesting. 😊

[@crowashington]

Though you might not feel so, You are the best at context snap analysis. "Never doubt it. Keep shooting." - Steve Kerr to Steph Curry

[@Zabougie]

I think including all of the factors you can think of is a good thing. Especially since it's not like we are meant to just buy or pass 100% based on the rating. The context helps viewers decide if they have more need of a card than most, or maybe should pass on a card they will never use, despite it's power level.

[@cthulhu6922]

I enjoy your recommendation because your knowledge is solid with regard to context. That being said....SD *will* change any card at any time - you cannot be held responsible for that eventuality. *I* listen to you and then measure how unique the card is and how flexible it is in various archetypes.

[@Fein1989]

They won't draw new players with December season cards... because you have to play a month to two to be able to access caches ;) So they won't be able to get even one of those cards no matter how much they want to. (if that was your point which im not sure).

[@Fein1989]

Always go with power. Context may change with how fast the meta changes and how hard it is to apprise future cards.

[@glenncarrere1744]

Context is the way particularly when it comes to collections, the meta, and future upsides

[@Whommper]

Think contextual recommendations are better talking about either the other cards needed to truly make a card shine or the datamines coming with really strong (potential) cards/packages. Like Madam Web has been awesome but only because I could afford Arana beside her.

[@cldrzfilms7163]

I think I prefer context which is helpful but having a bit of both could help people who are torn

[@rsBerry]

I like the first way of recommending cards you said.

[@4dagger44]

I think contextual recommendation is more important, but the power level is still also good to know.

[@TimHungry]

I think context is way more important for me. MarvelSnap has no shortage of powerful cards so the context is more important.

[@a1b2c3march9]

I would say context, especialy for the next card coming out, Fenris. It does seem like a good card, but it will only be consistently good in large lad sort of metas. (Large lads is what I call 10+power focused decks.)

[@cacty32]

Yeah I'd say context wins out but it is a messy situation that I don't envy you for having to navigate.

[@alexkross186]

Context is always important for recommendations

[@scentedrobin]

Contextual is the way to go for me. Helps a lot in planning card purchases. Also thanks Snap Judgments for the daily deck news.

[@sascha4356]

I personally prefer recommendation on context, as it helps me more build an effective collection

[@bradendrawsstuff590]

Context is great most cards are generically strong but it’s nice to hear what to really get

[@magriel13]

Id also prefer contextual recommendations. I think you do a fine job as is now. A little of column A and a little bit of column B.

[@rockhagen]

I absolutely trust your recommendations on card acquisition. I always wait for at least your review on Friday. Never was disappointed. Thanks so much, your content means a lot.

[@snapjudgmentspod]

Appreciated!!

[@fitzciaran]

Recommend on power, mention the context factors that's great, but it will affect each viewer differently so we need to judge that ourselves. (different people have different keys saved is the obvious but also they have different collections, needing different 2nd/3rd cards in future caches and have access to different decks based on collection)

[@Ghost_panther16]

I prefer context over power. But a little bit of both is appreciated. Tend to go for stuff that pairs with what I have and can build toward

[@gabrielrodriguesfacchinice564]

I prefer the recommendation is based on power, because context shifts very quickly due to weekly card releases, OTAs and patches.

[@enciam9791]

Funnily enough I just matched against LukeSkaarWalker on ladder whilst I was trying out his deck :) no idea about the Italian player boosting thing, but I can tell you he was number 2 when I played him and he was running the Thanos Arishem thing everyone seems to be playing at the moment.

[@snapjudgmentspod]

He's down to 2 with that. I have the new #1 tomorrow. It's Thanos w/o ari

[@enciam9791]

@@snapjudgmentspod Haha, of course you already know his rank and new deck - I have no idea how you stay so in touch with the top players meta decks (plus real life, job, union etc), but I am sure glad you do!

[@JJbrucey]

I’m thinking Power. Your thoughts today on Malaketh has me reconsidering pulling for him.

[@hypertwink]

I think for me, it's better to know everything about a card before you get it. So yeah, context is always key :)

[@AndreaCalussi-p2g]

You are already doing both and that's fantastic. However if i should chose i think that contextualized recommandations are better and can allow us to manage our resources in a better way (speaking as a F2P player)

Context still matters-- thanks Glazer

[@spincut13]

After many bad weeks I pulled Malakeith and Valentina in exactly the two keys 👌 , and yeah glad to have both (was also why I was asking about Proxima or Scorn since I had the urge to buy one, and yeah scorn seems more usable without Proxima but hard to see a lot of discard with one and not the other)

[@jamesw.anderson1559]

I usually look at a few opinions before getting a card, someone like KM is the closes I am aligned to in playstlye, so I would prefer you keep the recommendations as you have been. That said I did buy Misery cause you said to get it and played it precisely 3 times 😅

[@Solarbeholder]

I think by meta context makes a lot of sense. Maybe a short comment about the cards power and a vacuum compared to cards of its cost.

[@ScottCabernet]

I think it's good to get both a quick summary (how powerful is it?) and some context (why is it like this?). Both are valuable when making a decision.

[@caseyh593]

I definitely favor the context approach. One thing you do an excellent job of, wgich provides context of a different sort, is making recommendations based upon what playstyles a person prefers and making it known when bias toward, say, bounce, might be factoring in, slightly to one's enjoyment of a card. Way too long version, anyone who expects you to have a 100 percent accurate objective review of all the cards which come out fundamentally misunderstands the meaning the words in this sentence. What you do, and should continue, is giving a great look at where a card sits currently, who might enjoy such a card, and whether there seems to be a highly likely impact to the card in the near future. That's valuable intel. Thanks!

[@Raiko77]

Context is important, even there's OTAs and updates !

[@RSinist-12]

I guess I’m not really sure what you could do differently. I love the way you provide context and discuss the cards and your recommendations. Fwiw, I don’t do what you say. I hear what you say and make my own decisions. For example, I picked up Frigga because I liked the style of decks that it fits in and it looked like a fun card to play with. I don’t think you provided a “buy” recommendation, your feedback help me feel like it wouldn’t be a wasted purchase for me.

[@RSinist-12]

In the long run, I probably shouldn’t have picked it up, but that’s on me, not you.

[@derekmentzer8842]

I like the overall factors going into a buy or pass on a card. Also, while V1 Matt Hardy was indeed awful, I do believe he was able to redeem that gimmick a little with Broken Matt Hardy (the TNA run, before Vince could predictably ruin it).

[@snapjudgmentspod]

I just don't like him and I don't know why

[@derekmentzer8842]

@snapjudgmentspod he has always had runner-up energy and has seemed fine with it lol. The Hardy's are only what they are because Jeff is a lunatic.

[@goleador7100]

I think maybe recommend more on power, and add context next, like future cards like you said, and most importantly I think if the card has a great future (Malekith for example is good now but can also be good for a long time with his effect being impacted regularly with new releases).

[@crispytortilla]

I like how you handled malekith… You said it’s a really good card, but, next months card look busted! So then you can assess your situation and determine whether or not to use your caches.

[@Skrewdbylife]

I skipped two cards, I got every card except hulkling and antivenom. Now anti venom os everywhere

[@michaelv7762]

I think context is really important, but what is also really important - video gameplay. Love your vids tho 👍

[@ericleong79]

Is the rsBerry Peef deck: Black Swan card replaceable?

[@snapjudgmentspod]

Nope

[@brinkbeats]

for bounce decks, is Toxin pretty much required? Trying to decide whether it's worth it to blow money on buying the card!

[@snapjudgmentspod]

I don't think so

[@brinkbeats]

good looking out!

[@zandal3166]

Great video as always, my question, I have that, I hope you can possibly answer, is when is it better to use spotlight keys as opposed to tokens when getting new cards?

[@susovandingal2015]

I personally prefer context over power bcz that makes so much difference......And speaking of malekith,I was lucky enough to get him on my first try of Spotlight.Thanks to your guide previous week,using him on discard deck currently.

[@Straightedge5797]

I’d say context is probably the most important, but power should matter to a certain extent. I really do think you’ve helped me in my choosing of cards these past few months and I’ve been able to keep my key count up for a month like December

[@gzk256]

Deff recomend based on weekly context

[@pagem2uk]

Interesting question, power is great but without a relevant context is kind of meaningless. Certainly if a main frame for context is the meta then overall card "power" is a bad gauge for recommendations as is likely often to be miss-leading.

[@bryantsui6387]

I think you need both power and context. As a player they just have to decide after looking at both BTW Silky Splat V1 is genius. 😲

[@IIEDG3II]

I prefer u recommend cards based on context. Like u said before if u r low on resources next month cards r better that helps a lot❤

[@Jordonimus]

I mean, both? It's nice to know what you think on power but also within the context of known information.

[@VeganCATS1]

I think context should always be mentioned, as it really matters, that said, I don’t care that much, as I usually can plan my token/key usage myself. On another note: if Malekith and Anti-Venom make Snap less fun, then please second dinner make more such fun-killer card

[@d3st1n4t10nPL]

Of course - context. We have all week to decide if we want to buy it or not.

[@joedoe7572]

I think you should recommend cards similar to the way you did them in this video. You both said that it is powerful, but also that you think other, more powerful cards are coming out next month. And that's why you recommended I open this week, since i am careful about what i open, but don't have a shortage of Keys

[@mojotheclown82]

I think we need the context, especially as it's so hard to get new cards we need to consider which ones to get!

[@JJG_]

i prefer context and what they could fit in with the future.

[@joevanhy5171]

Hello, I like it better when you give context, as long as you specify it.

[@Labo..]

Appreciate your input on the new card every week if it is strong or just meh. And decks that the new cards might be useful ❤

[@HURLEY7130]

Malekith appears to be played alongside either anti-venom or wiccan, or even both, so I can't seem to justify purchasing this card as I have neither of the pairing cards he appears to be optimal with.

[@iamlilc]

I enjoy the recommendation, but with anyone I take it with a grain of salt. With yours, it would be 2 grains, but I still use my own judgement. Thanks for the vid!

[@Toxi_Chris]

Please give recommendations based on context

[@brobbybrobb666]

I think context is important, and I really appreciate it, but as long as you present the facts, your audience can make their own decisions. Right now, I have 5 keys, and I don't own Malekith nor Valentina, and I'm really struggling to decide if I should use my keys for them, because of what's coming. The caches aren't that good, except for the new cards. So I have to think that I will likely use 2-4 keys (I don't remember when was the last time I got a new card in just one key, but it was a very long time ago) just to get 1 card. So yes, context is important.

[@croside8077]

i think is good to have context. its better for the people that are F2P and have limited resurces

[@lefkash]

I think context is more important so we can actually understand what's happening, but I do think raw Power is better of mass appeal

[@shakthiudhai7982]

Its good that you recommend cards based on context. However, I'd prefer you recommend cards based on context. Here's why : You already make more than enough videos to make us aware of the upcoming cards and their value. So when you recommend cards by power, I think it will make us understand more of the significance of the card you recommend and thus enabling us to make a better card acquisition plan. Thank you.

[@alexsipigin5976]

Both: current power / context and future potential power.

[@LeThanhTinN]

I prefer you recommend cards based on context

[@cupidy]

For the Season Pass question, I think you should just recommend cards based on their power and let the viewers decide whether they want to pick up the card or not based on their own collection. Every player has a different collection level, so it’s impossible to account for all the different scenarios. Just recommending cards based on their power level should be fine.

[@mischawoolf3686]

I would like if u told us if a card will be good regardless of what is coming next! We can make our own decisions based on professional input/feedback on the card. Ofc people can wait untill the next vid for a review on the newest card! Love the content keep it up❤

[@cazzyjunk7585]

Thanks Glazer. Contextual is more sensual.

[@azarru1558]

I would prefer context because i'm a casual player so can't grind for hours

[@MultiBatmanbeyond]

I prefer context over power like loki, copycat, red guardian and etc.

[@zandal3166]

Lmao Villano 1 and 2 i presume lmao

[@spotpuffyoutube]

Power and context. They're correlated.

[@3need4ever]

Recommendation based on context is better,

[@trevorfaulkner5481]

Contextual recommendations based on future power doesn't work because future cards will always be powerful. It's better to cite the Archetypes that benefit and let the viewer decide.

[@Hawkdawg33]

I like your style now but power would be nice

[@riseofpotatonation]

that last deck doesnt make sense for turn 5s and 6. You have 7 and 8 energy for the last 2 turns yet its not reflected in the cards placed. Malekith + SK/Max = 6, sage + jug = 6 2 wasted energy..same with ronan for just 5 energy…whats the point of wiccan if not used? …this would actually hurt speed as he’d lose potential energy spent.

[@snapjudgmentspod]

So, like, if you get wiccan off, play extra cards. Sorry I thought that was obvious.

[@EMMA-GAMES]

Should I get sersi y'all send me lists