The explanation of the Transactional Outbox pattern is pretty nice and clear, as for me. Thank you! :)
@alexaugusto5935 Жыл бұрын
And about the concurrency of many microservices instances reading and writing in outbox table? Should I use a lock?
@alexaugusto5935 Жыл бұрын
What about the message order, it's not important? Won't be interesting to have a timestamp column and store the date and time which the message was created? So it can be sent in order later? Or even use a sequential id.
@shanefeather-lopez59355 жыл бұрын
Fascinating topic! I find I am becoming more of a persistence nut than anything else these days, that probably has something to do with your videos :)
@Thorben-Janssen5 жыл бұрын
Happy to hear that :)
@diononeofyourbusiness86343 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation. I just implemented absolutely the same, for the same reasons, without knowing that this is a formalized design pattern.
@jayachristina3 жыл бұрын
very clear articulation. thanks for this!
@michelalessandro5 жыл бұрын
Wonderful overview explanation. Your teaching methodology is unique and didact.
@Thorben-Janssen5 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Soromeister2 жыл бұрын
What about gRPC?
@josecarlosrodriguez45745 жыл бұрын
How could I manage transactions when I have more than one instance of the same persistence microservice?
@Thorben-Janssen5 жыл бұрын
You can use local transactions in the same way as you would use them in a monolithic application. Local transactions don't cause any problems in a micorservice system.
@vasileiosmarantos45572 жыл бұрын
Thank you for nice video. Can you make a video for inbox pattern?