Bramblefort Fink is from the Oko Planeswalker precon.
@jwish8276 ай бұрын
I appreciate how the drawer in the intro looks pristine, then it becomes a mess once a pack is selected.
@DeaconofPlague6 ай бұрын
I never noticed that until now, lol
@BenMarcWilliams6 ай бұрын
Yeah, that's a stark difference.
@nrofl6 ай бұрын
@@BenMarcWilliams come on now, you can't blame it *all* on Graham
@BenMarcWilliams6 ай бұрын
@@nrofl I'm glad someone caught the pun.
@dungeononion6 ай бұрын
69th like
@AurumAquila6 ай бұрын
"Oh, 2019. That's not so bad, that was just last year" 😅 💀
@campbellolney97536 ай бұрын
It's impressive you were given that pack 4 years ago when the set only came out 1 year ago in 2019
@kal24896 ай бұрын
Fun fact about Shepherd of the Flock. It is a vanilla creature whenever it's not an adventure on the stack. I play it unashamedly in Jasmine Boreal EDH
@GFreeGamer6 ай бұрын
Korvold was so good that it saw Standard play for a brief moment. The Brawl commanders all have the actual set symbol, so they were all standard legal for a time.
@tomneilson95016 ай бұрын
its the reason arcane signet is modern legal!
@insane00426 ай бұрын
Thank you Graham and James and Matt and Jordyne!
@thephantomgamer64236 ай бұрын
Maybe Bramblefort Fink is from the Oko Planeswalker starter deck.
@NStripleseven6 ай бұрын
It would be, just given the “If you control an Oko planeswalker” text.
@Dgnarus6 ай бұрын
FYI: Terence Trent D'Arby goes by Sananda Maitreya these days :)
@Eramiserasmus6 ай бұрын
Nothing like a good Crack a Pack to make the day better
@RaunienTheFirst6 ай бұрын
"the pack is $19.98" Oh, that's alright, it's only last year.
@KorrenTheNinth6 ай бұрын
I just noticed that according to KZbin's game info under the video, MTG came out in 1997? Odd
@kristianfischer98146 ай бұрын
Video game version came out in 1997. Wheeler has played it quite a lot on stream.
@KorrenTheNinth6 ай бұрын
@@kristianfischer9814 makes sense that KZbin would pull that date then!
@brendaneichler52446 ай бұрын
Fun fact: For a while, the nonfoil Korvold was the more expensive version
@karlgrylls24066 ай бұрын
ooooh i LOVE Giant Killer! They should give him his own animation on Arena!
@gamerbear846 ай бұрын
Bramblefort Fink would be from the Planeswalker deck starring the not good version of Oko.
@DeaconTaylor6 ай бұрын
i had forgotten this was called throne of eldraine. i know wilds of but i had it in my head that this was just eldraine. maybe if they didnt speed rush each set they would be easier to remember
@MarlaDesat6 ай бұрын
Delightful as always!
@CharlotteMimic6 ай бұрын
We did a mega sealed pool for this set with one Collector Booster, and I opened extended foil Castle Garenbrig :)
@adancein6 ай бұрын
Damn, Circle of Loyalty is still 3$... I remember *loving* to jam the knights deck in 2019 standard
@Roll-Penut6 ай бұрын
Idk what the terence Trent D'arby reference is, but I know 2 things that referenced him; Homestar runner: in 3 times Halloween funjob, in the "standing around in the spooky woods commenting on each others' costumes" portion, coach z mistakes strong bad's o-zone costume for terence Trent D'arby as part of a joke where everyone thinks his costume is someone else, as they did in the first 2 toons where he was Carmen Miranda and Carmen Sandiego respectively where people mistake his costume and both times he says "I'm Carmen freakin miranda/Sandiego!" And in this one he starts to say the same thing before remembering he is, in fact, ozone from breakin' and not a Carmen The other is from Jojos bizarre adventure where the game guy in part 3 is named D'arby after terence Trent D'arby
@LupineVolt6 ай бұрын
Excited to see y'all reacting to Bloomburrow reveals soon.
@Eggmojii6 ай бұрын
11:03 Graham sounded exactly like Geralt
@robertunijat82996 ай бұрын
OG collector booster = best collector booster!
@warlordmacilvernock19796 ай бұрын
Cuombajj Witches was a Summon Witches.
@ArdenDag6 ай бұрын
and now they are errata'd into human wizard
@JasonOshinko6 ай бұрын
Merriman Lyon? Is that a Dark Is Rising reference?
@alexandredesbiens-brassard91096 ай бұрын
According to Mark Rosewater, Wizards chose the type "Warlock" over "Witch" because "Witch refers to a real religious group".
@RiverGloom6 ай бұрын
Still wondering what happened to Garruk, all these years later
@uwtartarus6 ай бұрын
I hate foils, with the only exception is Emry, Lurker of the Loch, because the foiling was done exquisitely.
@taylord20066 ай бұрын
Crack! A! Pack!
@wademiller23766 ай бұрын
Ya those original collector boosters were sweet without being too crazy, only got a full art foil every 3 packs or so? They actually hold their value because you didnt get several per pack like now
@wormspeaker6 ай бұрын
Circle of Loyalty is everything I want to do in an Eldraine draft or really just MTG in general. My first pick easy. Then force black/white Knights.
@PKFat6 ай бұрын
Did anyone else mistake the Garruk on that pack for Dr. Doom & got real curious what Graham was opening?
@ToxicAtom6 ай бұрын
I didn't, but now that you said it, I will every time I see that art of garruk
@admanios6 ай бұрын
Nah, but if you wait for the Marvel set next year, I'm sure Dr. Doom will be on packs
@SirBlix6 ай бұрын
Where's the best place to get a barrowich?
@stephan55746 ай бұрын
2019 was just last year, not half a decade ago. 😅
@TehAmelie6 ай бұрын
Okay I have a stupid question as a non-Magic player. Adventure cards: Do you get both the sorcery and the creature or just one or the other? Gatherer does not spell it out (hoho) and so I'm lost.
@Argusthecat6 ай бұрын
You can cast them as the sorcery side from your hand, and it goes into exile (on an adventure!) and then you can cast it as the creature side after that. It only works in that direction though; you can't cast the sorcery while the creature is in play or anything like that.
@twarnold146 ай бұрын
If I recall, this set added warlock as a creature type. So they did add something for the witches, but they chose a word that is less gender-coded (since witch is heavily associated with women). Edit: I was reminded that they avoided “witches” to not insult the religious practitioners (I believe they are called Wiccans).
@Mordalon6 ай бұрын
Weirdly, they didn't go back and change any previous Witches into Warlocks. Most Witches before were either Shamans or Wizards.
@alexandredesbiens-brassard91096 ай бұрын
That's not the reason they chose warlock over witches. According to Maro, it's because "witches are a real religious group". Yeah, dumb.
@Argusthecat6 ай бұрын
@@alexandredesbiens-brassard9109 This is especially silly because SO ARE CLERICS. Priest is a real religious rank, not an abstract fantasy thing, and they use that all the time!
@alexandredesbiens-brassard91096 ай бұрын
@@Argusthecat Yup, it's silly, especially since "witch" as a cultural concept predates neopaganism by centuries. My guest is that there is someone on the Magic team that identify as a witch (being either Wicca or another branch of neopaganism) and that lobbyied internally for Warlock over Witch.
@Mordalon6 ай бұрын
@@Argusthecat Cleric isn't directly associated with a specific religion, but multiple. Modern Wiccans specifically use the term Witches for themselves. I get that it's a bit of a stretch, but the situations aren't interchangeable.
@admanios6 ай бұрын
Korvold is perhaps the most emblematic of a card that solves its own problem. It set forth a precedent that has lasted to this day.
@pepil00746 ай бұрын
FYI: The bramble fort fink is from de commander precons of throne of eldraine Edit: False info, after digging into it, it actually came from a 60 card deck themed around Oko.
@TheGosgosh6 ай бұрын
Really? I thought it was the Oko precon deck (standard, 60 cards)
@NStripleseven6 ай бұрын
@@TheGosgoshgiven it has the weird “If you control an X planeswalker” synergy, you’re probably right
@tipulsar856 ай бұрын
Throne only had two types of precon decks, The brawl decks and the planeswalker decks. Why not EDH/Commander? Because this was from before they did commander decks for every set, and were trying to make brawl a thing.
@pepil00746 ай бұрын
@@TheGosgosh just did a little more research. You’re absolutely right. My bad.