Timeline Of The Rulers Of Bulgaria

[@Warsawke]

3:47 Picture of Chaka is wrong, sorry for the mistake.

[@plamenbonev7787]

Marin Raykov 2013 Georgi bliznashki 2014 Ognian Gergzikov 2017 Stefan Yanev 2021 now

[@comparisonofempires2226]

@Драгољуб Дража Михаиловић Chaka is tatar khan

[@BazookaLuca]

4:53 5:43 Funfact: Those Simeon are the same person

[@BazookaLuca]

I once found that out while scrolling Wikipedia Very interesting I think

[@stanciusorinkonstantin6744]

The first term he was a kid and in early 2000 the second term he is old

[@petertodorov9540]

Great Work as Always Brother You are the Best

[@tonit4233]

Very good video. I really liked the maps aswell. Fairly accurate.

[@Warsawke]

Thanks dude!

[@KheyPard]

FINALLY !!! You're back !

[@Warsawke]

:)

[@F27838]

Hello

[@KheyPard]

@@F27838 What a coincidence ! I was just reading your "rest in piece" comment when I saw you answering back to me :)

[@F27838]

Thanks!

[@micahistory]

ikr

[@stars5206]

The mistake you made is that Asparuh is not the first Bulgarian ruler. Bulgaria signed the first peace treaty with the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) in 481 and this is recorded in historical sources written by Roman chroniclers. But if we ignore this information, we must start with the ruler of Old Great Bulgaria, Kubrat, who ruled Bulgaria from 632 to 665.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Bulgar* ruler

[@fcalvaresi]

That's controversial. The people were not the same.

[@stars5206]

@@fcalvaresi Ignorance is the greatest evil on earth! If the people of today are something different from the people of a thousand years ago, the question arises, where did the people of a thousand years ago disappear and where did the people of today come from?

[@fcalvaresi]

@@stars5206 easy, the people were living in the territory of modern Bulgaria. When the Turkic Bulgars arrived in the Balkans, they became the lords of the local Slavic folks living there. This resulted in the creation of the Bulgarian people.

[@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra3937]

Bulgar

[@micahistory]

great job. glad you're back

[@bulgariannationalist1637]

Bulgaria for Bulgarians

[@bulgariannationalist1637]

@throwaway 778 a?

[@bulgariannationalist1637]

@@yaralikatil What

[@petertodorov1792]

@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari9649 Zonja Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her parents in Gostivar

[@nebojsamarkovic7414]

Could you tell me which program you use to make timeline videos? Serbian ruller in 3:47 his name is Caslav Klonimirovic Well done for the effort. Like and sub.

[@Warsawke]

Camtasia

[@talridisblagoev242]

4:50 1918-1943 RIP Boris was the last good one to died + bulgarian monarchy. afther that it went to communist heel and so called (fake and corrupted to the core) democracy :(

[@matzavas4995]

Weird how this little child in 4:45 and the last guy in 5:45 are the same person

[@plamenbonev7787]

He is ruler after the vote of 2001 and his party NDSV

[@sergiodanailov4687]

missed something, other Bulgaria does not show, such as Old Great Bulgaria and Volga Bulgaria. 😌😄🙈

[@santi0501]

Nice job

[@alejandrosotomartin9720]

The communists: Simeon, you are not going to rule in Bulgaria anymore. Simeon: Hold my glass of rakia.

[@dr.swagington7754]

Just like to say love this video

[@GrPtrww]

Good video, but you made few mistakes. 1/ The last ruler of the first bulgarian empire is Presian II who ruled for a few months 2/ Ivan sratsimir ruled the tsardom of Vidin (which is part of the hiatory of the second bulgarian empire) from 1356 to 1396 3/ After Ivan Sratsimir, Constantine II Asen came to power and ruled the tsardom of Vidin from 1396 to 1422. Also at the end why did you put the prime ministers of Bulgaria and not the presidents?

[@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra3937]

but only got free time in 1395-1396

[@TheGilliams]

Nice job!

[@Warsawke]

Thank you !

[@davithemudkip1655]

Video suggestion: Timeline of the Brazilian rulers.

[@micahistory]

timeline of canadian rulers after that

[@Historical_Wonder]

I love Bulgaria and I’m from the Philippines. 🇧🇬❤🇵🇭

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Nikov is the first Bulgarian historian to pay special attention to, and attri bute great significance to, the Turkic components in the Bulgarian ethnogen esis (i.e., after the Bulgars) and among the ruling aristocracy. He elaborated on the issue of the "Turkic element's" influence upon Bulgarian history in a 1928 unpublished manuscript (delivered as a public lecture). Nikov began with the following policy-setting statement: There is no period in our history on which the Turkic element did not exert its strongest influence and did not leave the deepest traces in the development of our people. [...] None of the Balkan peoples has experi enced the Turkic influence so strongly as our people, The Turkic pressure began from Central Asia and had two directions to the northwest through southern Russia, and to the southwest through Persia and Asia Minor. The Bulgarian state was founded due to one of the Turkic peoples, the Bulgars, who themselves joined a number of Turkic tribal alliances (of Huns, Kutrigurs, Utigurs, Avars, and Khazars). During Byzantine rule, the Turkic Pechenegs and Uz came from the north; many of them crossed the Danube and were assimilated by the Bulgarian people. Then came the Cumans, without whose decisive help the uprising of Asenevtsi would hardly have succeeded. Thus, just as the First Bulgarian Kingdom was founded with the help of the Turkic Bulgars, the Second Kingdom was founded with "the decisive collabora tion of the Turkic Cumans."129 Not only did Cumans settle south of the Danube and become assimilated and absorbed by the Slavic-Bulgarian people, but they were also of great significance politically in the Second Kingdom, whose dynas ties all had Cuman blood in them. There were also many Bulgarian boyars of Cuman origin, including Balic in Dobrudzha. It could even be said that the Cumans acquired a dominant position in the political life of the state. 130 There followed the influence of the Mongol Tartars, who even supplied one Bulgarian king, Chaka. But of greatest importance were the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, who conquered the Balkans from Asia Minor. Concerning the Cumans, Nikov considers the "transfusion of blood" from Turkic "elements" an asset, a means of rejuvenating and strengthening the "race" and enhancing the vitality of the Bulgarian people (in contrast with the conquering Turks).

[@LazyMapper]

Nice!

[@Warsawke]

ta

[@continentalmapper1090]

Are your graphics HD warshsw?

[@TheRougefish]

Timeline inaccuracies and spelling mistakes but the effort to make this video is appreciated. It is hard to find any information on the topic of Bulgarian rulers.

[@comparisonofempires2226]

where is Constantin II Asen

[@AlexAhmedov]

What about Kubrat?

[@Warsawke]

The video starts from 681 so it is more straight forward

[@EnesCagrTonyal]

Fajne mate!

[@babiyarnazarismaily6207]

When bulgaria was defeated by the byzantenes she was incorporated into the empire but kept its nobels as reagonal governors until the end of the byzantene occupation in 1187,so this was not end of the first bulgarian empire ,but a new form of life for the state for almost two centuries,when asen dinasty liberated bulgaria they were rulers of tarnovo area being bulgarians(some say they are kuman,or vlachs,but they spoke and wrote in bulgarian and claim the throne of the old bulgarian tzars and thats what is important

[@cnarozkilimci9331]

Can you make the timeline for Turkey and Albania?

[@andrefarfan4372]

Great job!. #Rosalina

[@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra3937]

Who ruled in the 1990-91 gap?

[@August_Aurelian]

Nice

[@tatarkhan33]

How did you made this video

[@Warsawke]

Paint.net + Camtasia

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Hmmm

[@gigachad7383]

Simeon The Great 😁👍

[@wigamming2517]

Simeon The second is the same guy Simeon Sakskoburggotski cause he admit he was the last king 2001-05

[@KOLEJ22DrogaPrzygody]

Witam i pozdrawiam ciekawie w materiale 🙌

[@cnarozkilimci9331]

Hello ,neighbor from Turkey.

[@petertodorov9540]

Hello Neighbor God bless you

[@_xpawix_hdvideomapper7838]

Fajne!

[@КалоянСтефанов-к1ъ]

Why is Simeon II a child

[@owaischlanguages2081]

Best

[@lordvader5756]

The ending is so depressing

[@DailyKosia]

Interesting... but why you didn't put Dimitrov, who had even a mausoleum for himslef? Also, a photo of Ganev here: persons-info.com/persons/GANEV_Dimitr

[@Warsawke]

I couldn't find the photo Thx !

[@a4kata40]

Dimitrov is traitor

[@zixby2]

Simeon the II and Simeon Saxocoburg are the same person

[@F27838]

Greetings

[@Warsawke]

Hi

[@ethnicityofhistory7334]

Mashallah

[@BazookaLuca]

150 left to 2000 🥳

[@WTFCDFoxy]

Big Boi Boyko

[@Warsawke]

Da

[@fcalvaresi]

Best rulers : Asparukh Tervel Kardam Krum Omurtag Simeon the Great Samuel Petar IV (or Petar II) Ivan Asen I Kaloyan Ivan Asen II Todor Svetoslav Boris III

[@rawka_7929]

Man really avoided Boris I, say whatever you want about him but if it wasn't for him a lot of what we associate with Simeon wouldn't have been nearly as great.

[@bergahorning]

Fajne

[@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari9649]

At the time,the new Khazar qaganate was expanding westward,squeezing out the Onogurs,or Bulghars as they begin to be named. One of the Kuvrat’s sons,the Asparuch (Asparux,Isperih) now celebrated as the founder of Bulgaria,forcibly crossed to the Danube arpund 679 to occupy imperial territory Moesia after defeating the forces of Constantine IV (668-685). The event is recorded in the preserved text of a Hebrew letter of a Khazar qahan,who wrote that the Vununtur(=Onogurs=Bulghars) has fled across the Duna,the Danube. Even if numerous for the steppe,Asparuch’s pastoralist warriors and their families were of necessity relatively few as compared to the agricultural Slav population that lived south of the Danube,and thus the Turkic-speaking Bulghars were assimilated linguistically by the Slav majority to form the medieval and modern Bulgarians. This particular ethnogenesis occuree gradually over a period of more than two centuries: there was the Turkic qan (or khan) Krum (803-814),Qan Omurtag (814-831),Qan Presian (836-852),then the wan who converted Boris I (852-889);then came Tsar Symeon (893-923), Tsar Peter I (927-970),and so on.But this transformation of Turkic shamanists into Slavic Christians did nothing to diminish the warlike character of the empire’s new neighbours. Because even warlike neighbours can be useful at times,the relations between the empire and the new Bulghar qaganate encompassed every possible variation,from intimate allience to all out-war,as exemplified by the career of the Bulghar qan or khan Tervel (or Tarvel-Terbelis in our Greek sources),the successor and probably son of Asparukh who ruled for some twenty-one years within the period 695-721,extant chronologies being inconsistent. “Bulghars and Bulgarians.” The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire, by EDWARD N. LUTTWAK, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, 2009, pp. 173

[@AlexAhmedov]

You are so annoying

[@petertodorov1792]

@@AlexAhmedov Brother She is a 12 year old Albanian girl named Fatlinda Islami She lives in Gostivar with her parents

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Fun fact: Most of them were Turkic (Bulgarian Empire) and a few them were Germanic (Kingdom of Bulgaria)😅

[@wasilenatodorova481]

Maybe the Turks are Bulgarien because we are much older then they existing and also maybe the Turks are mix with Bulgarien and Mongols 😅

[@santi0501]

Hello

[@bulgarianhdproductions511]

Moi wladcy :o

[@hasz1218]

sus

[@POGKPP]

fajen

[@legendmk52]

Even though we consider the Samoil period as a Macedonian Kingdom (because he revolted against Bulgaria and Byzantium and was based in Macedonia and other technicalities), the vid is pretty cool 👌

[@aleksk4151]

how he revolted against Bulgaria?

[@vasil.kamdzhalov]

How he revolted against bulgaria? :D

[@mishobankata8980]

"Revolted against Bulgaria", what idiot makes your history books? Samuil and his brothers lifted Bulgaria back on its feet after a catastrophe and led the bulgarian armies against Byzantium. Nobody considers this period as a "Macedonian Kingdom" except for North Macedonia. We understand you're mad that your country doesn't have medieval history, but that doesn't mean you can appropriate ours as your own.

[@Кристиян-у9я]

He didn't revolt against Bulgaria, he was its ruler. There was no such thing as a Macedonian Kingdom back then.

[@rawka_7929]

He literally groomed the Bulgarian rulers and only when they died did he assume leadership. Not to mention, Macedonians themselves are a divergent identity from Bulgarians, but we will ignore that here. Also the Bitola Inscription states that he was a Bulgarian Tsar.

[@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra3937]

Fajne

[@bulgarianhdproductions511]

Moi wladcy :o